On 3/3/2010 1:31 AM, retrogrouch@comcast.net wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 14:57:46 -0500, Occam’s Razor
> wrote:
>
>> On 3/2/2010 2:13 PM, retrogrouch@comcast.net wrote:
>>> On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 13:05:55 -0500, Occam’s Razor
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/2/2010 11:21 AM, retrogrouch@comcast.net wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:51:34 -0500, Occam’s Razor
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Will a Liberal Nation that votes by their feelings survive? –
>>>>>
>>>>> Ask Denmark?
>>>>>
>>>> So the answer is NO….
>>
>>
>>> Oh you didn’;t want an honest answer. You just wanted to spout off.
>>>
>>> I understand.
>>
>> NOT quite…..
>> If you did understand you would ask; Why is Denmark in the EU?
>>
>>
>>
>> “Denmark is a constitutional monarchy with a parliamentary system of
>> government. Denmark has a state-level government and local governments
>> in 98 municipalities. Denmark has been a member of the European Union
>> since 1973, although it has not joined the Eurozone. Denmark is a
>> founding member of NATO and the OECD.”
>
> I almost believe you think you had a point.

They are a State in the EU….. Denmark is being assimilated.

Denmark before Socialism and all their feelings took over is gone, and
NOW their Socialist Denmark is being assimilated into the EU collective.

Soon to become just another bland tasteless socialist state that is
homogenized and uniform across the EU. Socialist love to talk about
Diversity and yet all the laws they pass and the Socialist system itself
destroys diversity. They have lost their unique Nation and their
feelings have them voting for their own destruction.

The irony is staggering.

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Denmark
>
> . .
> Welfare state
>
> Denmark has a highly developed welfare safety net, which ensures that
> all Danes receive tax-funded health care and generous unemployment
> insurance. Denmark ranked the first in the European pensions barometer
> survey for the past two years[12] The lowest-income group before
> retirement from the age of 65 receive 120% of their pre-retirement
> income in pension and miscellaneous subsidies.
>
> The large public sector (30% of the entire workforce on a full-time
> basis[13]) is financed by the world’s highest taxes[11]. A value added
> tax of 25% is levied on the sale of most goods and services (including
> groceries). The income tax in Denmark ranges from 42.9%[11] to 63%
> progressively, levied on 4 out of 10 full-time employees[14]. Such
> high rates mean that 1,010,000 Danes before the end of 2008 (44% of
> all full-time employees) will be paying a marginal income tax of 63%
> and a combined marginal tax of 70.9% resulting warnings from
> organisations such as the OECD [15][16]. TV2 (Denmark) reported in
> April 2008 that abolishing the middle- and top-level income tax
> brackets would amount to two (2) and one (1) percent of public sector
> revenue, respectively, which equals one and a half percent of GDP. The
> public sector as a whole had a budget surplus of 4.4% of GDP in 2007,
> but the tax cuts would increase private consumption and the labor
> shortage and thus result in a deficit on the trade balance and
> pressure to increase wages even further. Proceeds from selling one’s
> home (if there is any home equity (da: friv?rdi)) is not taxed, as the
> marginal tax rate on capital income from housing savings is around 0
> percent.[17] A survey by Standard & Poor’s found that the total debt
> secured by mortgages in Danish homes amounts to 89.8% of GDP, which is
> above the debt level in other EU countries (and the U.S.A. at 74.6% of
> GDP).[18]
>
> Discussions on increasing the labor supply include abolishing a labor
> market arrangement called efterl?n (eng.:early retirement pay)[19], at
> the present (end of 3rd quarter 2008) with more than 130,000
> participants (60 years until 64 years of age)[20]. Participation in
> this scheme is also open for self-employed people (farmers, fishermen,
> lawyers, etc.). Shortening the time unemployment benefit can be
> received (four years at the present), as an example, is also
> discussed. The Danish Economic Council in its 2008 spring report (27
> May)[21] proposes limiting the dagpengeperiode to 2.5 years, which is
> still half a year more than at present in Norway and one and a half
> year more than in Sweden, said in an interview by the chairman (da:
> overvismand) (professor of economics, University of Copenhagen) Peter
> Birch S?rensen 27 May 2008 on the TV program Deadline (10.30 pm),
> channel DR2, the Danish Broadcasting Corporation.
> [edit] Tax Burden and employment
> [edit] Tax burden
>
> With a GDP of 1,642,215 million DKK and revenue from taxes and
> ownership at 803,693 million DKK (2006)[11], 49.07% of GDP, it is of
> extreme importance what happens in the tax-financed part of the
> economy. According to newly revised statistics, Denmark has had the
> world’s highest tax level in 2005 and 2006, at 50.7% and 49.1%
> respectively. Denmark also held this position 1970-74 and 1993-95 .
> These figures do not include income from ownership.[11]

Look at what they have done to Denmark, I left all this above
because it’s just so self explanatory. I couldn’t misspell anything
above because it was to important and succinct, so “hear” is one for you
after the fact.

Just my cense of humor……