<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>OutSourcedNews-Group &#187; social</title>
	<atom:link href="http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/social/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng</link>
	<description>You don&#039;t need to regulate FREEDOM</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:49:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Progressives found out with Prohibition, that hiding things in thousands of pages of laws and court minutia would make it harder to unwind their twisted web of lies and deceit.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/07/progressives-found-out-with-prohibition-that-hiding-things-in-thousands-of-pages-of-laws-and-court-minutia-would-make-it-harder-to-unwind-their-twisted-web-of-lies-and-deceit/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/07/progressives-found-out-with-prohibition-that-hiding-things-in-thousands-of-pages-of-laws-and-court-minutia-would-make-it-harder-to-unwind-their-twisted-web-of-lies-and-deceit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[23]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dredd Scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMTALA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMHO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[include]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TWO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 2/7/2012 5:05 PM, P&#038;*$?%s wrote: > On 2/7/2012 12:45 PM, RD Sandman wrote: >> P&#038;*$?%s wrote in news:jgs07m$50g$1 @&#038;*$?%dont-email.me: >> >>> On 2/7/2012 12:00 PM, RD Sandman wrote: >>>> P&#038;*$?%s wrote in >>>> news:jgrsaj$8rm$2 @&#038;*$?%dont-email.me: >>>> >>>>> On 2/7/2012 9:28 AM, RD Sandman wrote: >>>>>> P&#038;*$?%s wrote in >>>>>> news:jgpt18$o0o$1 @&#038;*$?%dont-email.me: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 2/7/2012 5:05 PM, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym> wrote:<br />
> On 2/7/2012 12:45 PM, <strong>RD</strong> Sandman wrote:<br />
>> <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym><none @none.com>  wrote in news:jgs07m$50g$1<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>dont-email.me:<br />
>><br />
>>> On 2/7/2012 12:00 PM, <strong>RD</strong> Sandman wrote:<br />
>>>> <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym></none><none @none.com>   wrote in<br />
>>>> news:jgrsaj$8rm$2<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>dont-email.me:<br />
>>>><br />
>>>>> On 2/7/2012 9:28 AM, <strong>RD</strong> Sandman wrote:<br />
>>>>>> <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym></none><none @none.com>    wrote in<br />
>>>>>> news:jgpt18$o0o$1<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>dont-email.me:<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> On 2/6/2012 4:<strong>23</strong> PM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> &#8220;<acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym>&#8221;</none><none @none.com>    wrote in message<br />
>>>>>>>> news:jgpk60$76b$1<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>dont-email.me&#8230;<br />
>>>>>>>>> On 2/5/2012 1:13 PM, <strong>RD</strong> Sandman wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>>> Josh<user @nowhere.com>    wrote in<br />
>>>>>>>>>> news:jgmqvc$69d$1<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>josh.motzarella.org:<br />
>>>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/5/2012 3:41 PM, <strong>RD</strong> Sandman wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh</user><user @nowhere.com>    wrote in<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:jgkboi$ec4$1<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>josh.motzarella.org:<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/4/2012 2:22 PM, <strong>RD</strong> Sandman wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> &#8220;Sid9&#8243;<sid9 @ bellsouth.net>    wrote in<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:jgjup8$6hm$1<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>dont-email.me:<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It may be <strong>social</strong> policy to prevent those who can afford<br />
>>>> health<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <strong>insurance</strong> from sponging off taxpayers for their medical<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> care. All this does is make coverage mandatory for those<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who would other wise free load on the rest of us.<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And how do you suppoese it will be imposed on illegals?<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After all,<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> they<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are about half of those uninsured and use <strong>EMTALA</strong> like their<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> primary<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> care<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> physician.<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Isn&#8217;t that solved by however we choose to solve the illegal<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>> immigration issue be it deportation or normalization, the<br />
>>>> latter<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>> would <strong>include</strong> an <strong>insurance</strong> mandate.<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> Only works if they are working. It is against the law for<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> them<br />
>>>> to<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> be in this country. <strong>EMTALA</strong> says that all will be treated in<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> emergency rooms regardless of ability to pay.<br />
>>>>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>> Didn&#8217;t I just say above the problem is solved by either<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> deporting the illegals or normalizing them? Either way, we<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> would no longer have illegals in this country. Thus, you are<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> bringing up a tangential issue to the <strong>insurance</strong> mandate that<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> has its own solution independent of the <strong>insurance</strong> mandate.<br />
>>>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>> The issue was part and parcel of a greater issue and shows<br />
>>>>>>>>>> newsgroup drift. The original issue that I came in on was the<br />
>>>>>>>>>> individual mandate where a failure to purchase private<br />
>>>>>>>>>> <strong>insurance</strong> could result in <strong>jail</strong> time and that, <strong>IMHO</strong>, the federal<br />
>>>>>>>>>> government does not have the constitutional <strong>power</strong> to mandate<br />
>>>>>>>>>> that an individual citizen must purchase a product produced by<br />
>>>>>>>>>> a private party.<br />
>>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> It doesn&#8217;t even have authority to mandate that an individual<br />
>>>> citizen<br />
>>>>>>>>> must purchase a product from a *public* party, hell, *ANY* party<br />
>>>> for<br />
>>>>>>>>> that matter.<br />
>>>>>>>> .<br />
>>>>>>>> .<br />
>>>>>>>> Sandman&#8217;s post of the following may be the model that the USSC<br />
>>>>>>>> will use to justify the <strong>insurance</strong> mandate in <strong>Obamacare</strong>:<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> &#8220;However, if you wish to see if there is any constitutional<br />
>>>>>>>> reason for Social Security, for example, look at Helvering v<br />
>>>>>>>> Davis, 301 <strong>US</strong> 619 (1937) in which the Court sustained the old age<br />
>>>>>>>> benefits provisions of the Social Securities Act of 1935.<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> Writing for the majority, Justice Benjamin Cordozo adopted an<br />
>>>>>>>> expansive view of the federal taxing and spending <strong>power</strong>.<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> He judged the old age benefits of the Social Security Act<br />
>>>>>>>> constitutional pursuant to ArtI(8) if the <strong>Constitution</strong>.<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> He pointed out that the Act was born in response to a<br />
>>>>>>>> &#8220;nation-wide calamity&#8221; that was unsolvable without a concentrated<br />
>>>>>>>> federal effort.<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> Perhaps.<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> Where in Article III is the judiciary empowered to solve a<br />
>>>>>>> &#8220;nation-wide calamity&#8221;?<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> Hint: it isn&#8217;t there.<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> The judiciary delegated powers that it doesn&#8217;t have any authority<br />
>>>>>>> to delegate.<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> There are <strong>TWO</strong> authorized ways to <strong>change</strong> the constitution:<br />
>>>>>>> Amendment (per Article V) and Revolution (per Declaration of<br />
>>>>>>> Independence).<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> There is NO other way.<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> Social Security is unconstitutional.  It may be the law, but it is<br />
>>>>>>> without basis.  That fact is indisputable.<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> Tell it to the Supremes.  They have ruled against you.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> Yep, they have.  It makes it the law, but it doesn&#8217;t make it right.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Oh, I make no claims on whether or not <strong>Supreme Court</strong> decisions are<br />
>>>> right, just on what they decided.  For example, we can just about all<br />
>>>> say that they were wrong on Wickard v Fillmore, <strong>Dredd Scott</strong>, Kelo v<br />
>>>> City of New Londin and <strong>Citizens United</strong>.  However, those cases still<br />
>>>> decided the law.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Don&#8217;t forget Roe v. Wade that legalized murder.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Yep, that&#8217;s the law.  It should not be permitted to be overturned, it<br />
>>> should be corrected via Amendment V (et alii).<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>><br />
>> Why do you keep referring to Article V, the <strong>amendment</strong> process?  There are<br />
>> beaucoup potential amendments introduced several times a year. So far,<br />
>> only 17 have made it.<br />
><br />
> And that is a good thing.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why so few make it, and so few are actually brought up for votes.</p>
<p>It should have been forced on many more issues that were instead<br />
referred to the courts to unconstitutionally &#8220;update&#8221; the constitution<br />
and laws with court opinions and rulings.</p>
<p>The <strong>Progressives</strong> found out with Prohibition, that hiding things in<br />
thousands of pages of laws and court minutia would make it harder to<br />
unwind their twisted web of lies and deceit.</p>
<p></sid9></user></none></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/07/progressives-found-out-with-prohibition-that-hiding-things-in-thousands-of-pages-of-laws-and-court-minutia-would-make-it-harder-to-unwind-their-twisted-web-of-lies-and-deceit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>the fact is that the S&amp;P 500 has achieved a total return of just 1.2% annually over the past 12 years</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/06/the-fact-is-that-the-sp-500-has-achieved-a-total-return-of-just-1-2-annually-over-the-past-12-years/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/06/the-fact-is-that-the-sp-500-has-achieved-a-total-return-of-just-1-2-annually-over-the-past-12-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 2/2/2012 1:02 AM, Bret Cahill wrote: >>> > > > thank god social security is not in the stock market where it can be >>> > > > stolen by anti-capitalist hucksters: Social Security is Money stolen by Socialist government hucksters, they&#8217;re using laws and government guns to back up their threat to, hand [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 2/2/2012 1:02 AM, Bret Cahill wrote:<br />
>>> > > > thank god <strong>social</strong> security is not in the stock market where it can be<br />
>>> > > > stolen by anti-capitalist hucksters:</p>
<p>Social Security is Money stolen by Socialist government hucksters,<br />
they&#8217;re using laws and government <strong>guns</strong> to back up their threat to, <strong>hand</strong><br />
over the <strong>money</strong> or die.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/06/the-fact-is-that-the-sp-500-has-achieved-a-total-return-of-just-1-2-annually-over-the-past-12-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>*They are Jim Crow laws*&gt;&gt;&gt;just as skin color is DNA so is longevity DNA, and that means Liberalism/Socialism is based on Bigoted discrimination of fellow humans.&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;*They are Jim Crow laws*</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/22/they-are-jim-crow-lawsjust-as-skin-color-is-dna-so-is-longevity-dna-and-that-means-liberalismsocialism-is-based-on-bigoted-discrimination-of-fellow-humans-they-are-jim-crow-laws-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/22/they-are-jim-crow-lawsjust-as-skin-color-is-dna-so-is-longevity-dna-and-that-means-liberalismsocialism-is-based-on-bigoted-discrimination-of-fellow-humans-they-are-jim-crow-laws-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AWG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Crachet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EQUAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMPORTANT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Crow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KNEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LOTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LYING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POLITICAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REDISTRIBUTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/22/2012 2:58 PM, SilentOtto wrote: > On Jan 22, 12:15 pm, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: >> On 1/22/2012 1:29 AM, SilentOtto wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Jan 21, 3:44 pm, Neolibertarian wrote: >>>> In article >>>> &#60;95918c1d-d230-4580-a647-96c9f165d&#8230;@v14g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, >> >>>> SilentOtto wrote: >>>>> On Jan 21, 1:38 pm, Bob [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/22/2012 2:58 PM, SilentOtto wrote:<br />
> On Jan 22, 12:15 pm, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>> On 1/22/2012 1:29 AM, SilentOtto wrote:<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>> On Jan 21, 3:44 pm, Neolibertarian <cognac ...@gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>>>> In article<br />
>>>> &lt;95918c1d-d230-4580-a647-96c9f165d&#8230;@v14g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,<br />
>><br />
>>>>  SilentOtto <silento ...@hotmail.com> wrote:<br />
>>>>> On Jan 21, 1:38 pm, <strong>Bob Crachet</strong> < @newspi.rit> wrote:<br />
>>>>>> On 1/21/2012 1:<strong>10</strong> PM, Möebius Pretzel wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> Yesterday news was that Scientist had determined that the hole in the<br />
>>>>>> ozone layer, over the Antarctic was caused by cold weather.<br />
>>>>>> The loonies have agendas and won&#8217;t be confused by logic and fact.<br />
>>>>>> Anyone every had Freon, the old fashioned refrigerant leak out saw that<br />
>>>>>> it sank to the ground. Most of it was broken up the environment, Very<br />
>>>>>> little made it to the Antarctic.<br />
>><br />
>>>>> The tobacco companies managed to confuse the matter of the health<br />
>>>>> risks connected to smoking for nearly thirty years.<br />
>><br />
>>>>> But, in the end, they lost and lost big time.<br />
>><br />
>>>> Irrelevant analogy. One has nothing to do with the other.<br />
>><br />
>>> Of course it does, rightard.<br />
>><br />
>>> Those with a vested interest in denying <strong>AWG</strong> have engaged the exact<br />
>>> same deliberately dishonest tactics that tobacco companies used to<br />
>>> deny the overwhelming scientific consensus that smoking was connected<br />
>>> to serious health risks.<br />
>><br />
>>> They lie, obfuscate data, engage in cherry picking, draw false<br />
>>> conclusions, pay so-called &#8220;experts&#8221; to misrepresent the nature and<br />
>>> state of the science, demonize their opposition, assign false motives<br />
>>> and do everything else the tobacco companies did to create confusion<br />
>>> about the issue in the public mind.<br />
>><br />
>>>> Admittedly, this species of fallacy is typical of the &#8220;global warming<br />
>>>> debate.&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>>> Perhaps your accusations of &#8220;fallacy&#8221; would be more persuasive had I<br />
>>> not already seen this game played out before.<br />
>><br />
>>>>> Soon, the actual environmental effects of <strong>AGW</strong> will start manifesting<br />
>>>>> in earnest, and the global warming deniers will lose just as big as<br />
>>>>> the tobacco companies did.<br />
>><br />
>>>> The models don&#8217;t work.<br />
>><br />
>>>> They haven&#8217;t suddenly begun to work, and they may never begin doing so.<br />
>><br />
>>>> Your problem is, even if the predictions fail miserably, year after<br />
>>>> year, even for fifteen or more years, never can any of these failures<br />
>>>> invalidate the predictions and the foundational theory.<br />
>><br />
>>>> &#8220;Just wait until next year&#8230;&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>>> The only real problem with the models is that they consistently<br />
>>> underestimate the feedback effect, which is, justifiably, extremely<br />
>>> difficult to quantify.<br />
>><br />
>>> Ultimately,  the Achilles heel of denialism is that the main<br />
>>> predictions of the science surrounding <strong>AWG</strong> are coming to pass.<br />
>><br />
>>> You&#8217;ll notice that while energy companies are continuing to publicly<br />
>>> deny the reality of <strong>AWG</strong>, that&#8217;s not stopping them from pressuring<br />
>>> various governments to assert offshore mineral rights in the Arctic.<br />
>><br />
>>> The proof of their duplicity is in the pudding, rightard.<br />
>><br />
>> They NOW believe the formaldehyde in the cigarette is connected to the<br />
>> cancer&#8230;.<br />
><br />
> No, rightard.<br />
><br />
> They NOW believe that <strong>LOTS</strong> of things in cigarette smoke are connected<br />
> to cancer, not just formaldehyde.<br />
><br />
>> And since formaldehyde is everywhere, can you tell us whether it&#8217;s the<br />
>> formaldehyde in the cigarette that somehow creates cancer or the other<br />
>> formaldehyde in life you contacted that is causing the cancer.<br />
><br />
> Name other sources where formaldehyde is delivered into the body in<br />
> similar concentrations to that delivered by cigarette smoke.<br />
><br />
> When it comes to carcinogens, amount -does- appear to matter,<br />
> rightard.<br />
><br />
>> Then can you tell us why some people get cancer while others don&#8217;t and<br />
>> is that because of formaldehyde or <strong>DNA</strong>.<br />
><br />
> For the terms of this discussion, it&#8217;s irrelevant.<br />
><br />
> Specifically speaking, the science says that smoking will -increase<br />
> one&#8217;s risk- of contracting cancer, not that all smokers will get<br />
> cancer.<br />
><br />
> Further, that&#8217;s the -exact- same thing that privately funded tobacco<br />
> company research showed, and is one of the reasons that they choose to<br />
> suppress that research, while at the same time they publicly claimed<br />
> that the link between smoking and cancer was unconfirmed and suggested<br />
> that those who had conducted studies showing otherwise were engaged in<br />
> flawed research, were attempting <strong>social</strong> engineering aimed at taking<br />
> away one&#8217;s freedom, were disgruntled former employees, were chasing<br />
> research grants or had some other ulterior motive that had nothing to<br />
> do with discovering the actual risks associated with smoking.<br />
><br />
> Man&#8230;  That sounds familiar, doesn&#8217;t it rightard?<br />
><br />
>> Then tell us why banning cigarettes would stop cancer.<br />
><br />
> Straw man.  Nobody from the scientific community has -ever- made that<br />
> claim, rightard.<br />
><br />
>> Wouldn&#8217;t you need<br />
>> to know what causes it and stop that? For instance the formaldehyde<br />
>> might be in your carpet&#8230;  Should you ban carpet?<br />
><br />
> You&#8217;re suggesting that companies should be allowed to sell carpet that<br />
> their own internal research shows releases hazardous levels of<br />
> carcinogens while concealing that fact from the general public and<br />
> denying independent studies that reach a conclusion that they already<br />
> know to be true from their own internal research?<br />
><br />
> How typically rightarded of you.<br />
><br />
>> What about low or NO formaldehyde cigarettes?<br />
><br />
> What about them, rightard?<br />
><br />
> This isn&#8217;t about selling a hazardous product as much as it&#8217;s about<br />
> selling a hazardous product while <strong>LYING</strong> about the associated risks<br />
> that they <strong>KNEW</strong> existed, yet denied.<br />
><br />
> Hey&#8230;  I&#8217;ve an idea.<br />
><br />
> How about I sell you some aspirin capsules that contain the advertised<br />
> amount of aspirin, (I wouldn&#8217;t want to be accused of false<br />
> advertising) but use rat poison as a filler?<br />
></p>
<p>I can buy my own rat poison and it&#8217;s taxed less than cigarettes you<br />
<acronym title="fucking"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> f&*$?%g</span></acronym> idiot.</p>
<p>> That shouldn&#8217;t be a problem for you, right?</p>
<p>NO because I expect it from the likes of you and that&#8217;s why government<br />
should stay away from my products, the government employs scum like you.</p>
<p>> After all, the internal research I&#8217;ve conducted and released publicly<br />
> shows that there is no conclusive link between ingesting the rat<br />
> poison in my capsules and dying.</p>
<p>Good&#8230;.   sell some and by tomorrow you would be hanging from a tree in<br />
front of your home.    people would find out and they would get justice.</p>
<p>> Now, while it&#8217;s true that independent studies strongly and<br />
> overwhelming disagree with the conclusions of my publicly released<br />
> studies, and show a conclusive link between taking rat poison and<br />
> dying&#8230;</p>
<p>Tylenol was under the gun by the public and they didn&#8217;t even put the<br />
poison in the pills.  The guy in <strong>China</strong> that used the wrong product and<br />
poisoned the Chinese dog food that was sold in America, conveniently<br />
committed &#8220;suicide&#8221;&#8230;..</p>
<p>> And, the internal research I&#8217;ve conducted and kept hidden from public<br />
> scrutiny show that rat poison is indeed deadly&#8230;</p>
<p>Only to rats or in large doses to humans, and because I understand that<br />
water in too large a dose is deadly also&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;tell us will you ever drink any water again since it&#8217;s deadly in<br />
large doses.   NO <acronym title="shit"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> s&*$?%t</span></acronym> dim bulb, people die from ingesting too much water.</p>
<p>> As I&#8217;m publicly denying any link between eating the rat poison in my<br />
> aspirin capsules and dying, there shouldn&#8217;t be any problem with<br />
> putting rat poison in aspirin capsules and selling it to you.</p>
<p>NONE at all, I plan to eat your aspirin when I am already dying so that<br />
my family and estate can sue you for my death 3 days early.  I hope you<br />
plan to have plenty of really good lawyers.</p>
<p>> Right, rightard?</p>
<p><acronym title="Asshole"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> A&*$?%e</span></acronym>.</p>
<p>> That should be OK with you if you think what the tobacco companies did<br />
> was acceptable.</p>
<p>We called them coffin nails and have done so from the 1920 and probably<br />
long before that.  If you thought it was good for you to smoke, then you<br />
deserve a Darwin award and we need not pine our loss to humanity.</p>
<p>Do we ban/tax rat poison because it can kill you, do we bam water<br />
because it can kill you?</p>
<p>> As to the rest your rightard rant&#8230;<br />
><br />
> It maxed out my rightardedness meter, so I&#8217;ll have to devote my<br />
> remaining usenet time to cleaning my meter rather than responding to<br />
> the remainder your post.<br />
><br />
> Heh heh&#8230;<br />
><br />
> Lying racist rightard socialists&#8230;<br />
><br />
> Batshit crazy and dogshit stupid, every single last one of you.</p>
<p>So &#8220;you&#8221; are saying there is a limit to the lies that you Liberals can<br />
tell at one time?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s new information about Liberals that I had no idea existed&#8230;.</p>
<p>I always thought the lies were limitless coming from Liberals.</p>
<p>>> You Liberals already have discriminatory laws and government affirmative<br />
>> actions that choose winners and losers by their <strong>DNA</strong>, for instance you<br />
>> have Social Security.<br />
>><br />
>> Like cigarettes you seem to think that discriminating and bigotry<br />
>> against people on a basis of their <strong>DNA</strong> is acceptable. Just look at<br />
>> Social Security where you penalize people whose <strong>DNA</strong> is for a short life,<br />
>> with paying a Social Security tax, and then you give that <strong>money</strong> to those<br />
>> with a <strong>DNA</strong> that are predisposed for a longer life.<br />
>><br />
>> Clear discrimination just as skin color is in <strong>DNA</strong> so is longevity in<br />
>> your <strong>DNA</strong>, and that means <strong>Liberalism</strong>/Socialism  is based on Bigoted<br />
>> discrimination of fellow humans.     *They are <strong>Jim Crow</strong> laws* all over<br />
>> again, Social Security and Smoking laws and education laws and funding<br />
>> and MORE&#8230;.<br />
>><br />
>> If you can take <strong>money</strong> from people as a tax to *<strong>REDISTRIBUTE</strong>* you can<br />
>> also take a chicken or bag of grain as in days of old or a kidney, and<br />
>> that means that you can steal from people with <strong>DNA</strong> that gave them a<br />
>> healthy kidney and give to those that their <strong>DNA</strong> gave weak kidneys.  And<br />
>> remember that &#8220;you&#8221; Liberals think that government can tax solely for<br />
>> the purpose of redistribution as in ObamaCare. And you have no concerns<br />
>> about discrimination by government, and you ignore the constitution.<br />
>> That makes it easy for government to justify their affirmative action<br />
>> programs.  Suppose they have a health care Affirmative action plan that<br />
>> includes transplants of kidneys?<br />
>><br />
>> To make life *<strong>FAIR</strong>* and *<strong>EQUAL</strong>* in its outcome, redistribution of all<br />
>> things is needed(Social Justice) so when you are taken off the street<br />
>> and taxed for your good health and become an affirmative action<br />
>> ObamaCare patient donor, remember the kidney you are paying <strong>taxes</strong> with<br />
>> was never really your own in a Socialist society.  And keep in mind it<br />
>> will keep someone more important than you alive.  Because when it comes<br />
>> to Socialism, the needs of the many out weighs the needs of the one, so<br />
>> your kidney will be much more wisely used by someone that contributes<br />
>> more than you to the many socialists needs.  In other words the <strong>BIG</strong><br />
>> <strong>IMPORTANT</strong> <strong>POLITICAL</strong> MEMBERS are far more important than the dime a dozen<br />
>> workers.<br />
>><br />
>> You will become an organ supply system to keep the important people<br />
>> alive&#8230;.   Maybe you are already?</p>
<p>I chuckled that you couldn&#8217;t even attempt this part where you know again<br />
you are guilty as charged and you have no Liberal talking points,<br />
because I have only posted it here a few times and there have been no<br />
Liberal think tanks that have ever sent out Liberal talking points on it.</p>
<p>But it was fun to see you react to the two points.  You spew the party<br />
dogma for one and are stumped when there is NO Democrat party talking point.</p>
<p>I expected no less.</p>
<p></silento></cognac></thendestroyeveryth>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/22/they-are-jim-crow-lawsjust-as-skin-color-is-dna-so-is-longevity-dna-and-that-means-liberalismsocialism-is-based-on-bigoted-discrimination-of-fellow-humans-they-are-jim-crow-laws-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Homeland Security monitors journalists &lt; &lt; &lt; GO NWO!!!</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/homeland-security-monitors-journalists-go-nwo/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/homeland-security-monitors-journalists-go-nwo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MEDIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Operations Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NWO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PRESIDENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIGHT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WING]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/10/2012 3:50 AM, Möebius Pretzel wrote: > Homeland Security monitors journalists It&#8217;s about time&#8230;.. Now you combine that with Obama&#8217;s new ability to use the military to lock people up as terrorist suspects and hold them with NO trial and and no constitutional rights, it means that the MEDIA will be disappearing when a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 3:50 AM, Möebius Pretzel wrote:<br />
> <strong>Homeland Security</strong> monitors journalists</p>
<p>It&#8217;s about time&#8230;..</p>
<p>Now you combine that with Obama&#8217;s new ability to use the military to<br />
lock people up as terrorist suspects and hold them with NO trial and and<br />
no constitutional rights, it means that the <strong>MEDIA</strong> will be disappearing<br />
when a good *<strong>RIGHT</strong> <strong>WING</strong>* <strong>PRESIDENT</strong> gets into office next year.</p>
<p>The <strong>Liberal Press</strong> will disappear, literally.</p>
<p>><br />
> Under the <strong>National Operations Center</strong> (<strong>NOC</strong>)’s Media Monitoring Initiative<br />
> that came out of <strong>DHS</strong> headquarters in November, Washington has the<br />
> written permission to retain data on users of <strong>social</strong> media and online<br />
> networking platforms.<br />
><br />
> Specifically, the <strong>DHS</strong> announced the <strong>NCO</strong> and its <strong>Office</strong> of Operations<br />
> Coordination and Planning (<strong>OPS</strong>) can collect personal information from<br />
> news anchors, journalists, reporters or anyone who may use “traditional<br />
> and/or <strong>social</strong> media in real time to keep their audience situationally<br />
> aware and informed.”<br />
><br />
> <a href="http://rt.com/usa/news/homeland-security-journalists-monitoring-321/" >http://rt.com/usa/news/homeland-security-journalists-monitoring-321/</a><br />
><br />
> &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
><br />
> End the corporate, fascist police state. <strong>Ron Paul</strong> 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/homeland-security-monitors-journalists-go-nwo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If BIGGER and more intrusive government were so much better then NORTH KOREA and even Prisons everywhere would be paradise.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/09/if-bigger-and-more-intrusive-government-were-so-much-better-then-north-korea-and-even-prisons-everywhere-would-be-paradise/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/09/if-bigger-and-more-intrusive-government-were-so-much-better-then-north-korea-and-even-prisons-everywhere-would-be-paradise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 20:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BIGGER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brown Shirts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bureaucracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fascism Fascism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[include]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[increased]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mao]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NORTH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stalin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the poor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utopia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/9/2012 1:28 PM, wy wrote: > On Jan 9, 12:58 pm, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hitler added &#8220;socialist&#8221; to his party&#8217;s name, specifically to confuse >>>>>>>>>> people. >> >>>>>>>>>> Works to this day. >> >>>>>>>>> Hitler renamed the Party because he wanted to attract nationalists and >>>>>>>>> proletarians. >> >>>>>>>> Yep. Exactly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/9/2012 1:28 PM, wy wrote:<br />
> On Jan 9, 12:58 pm, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>> Hitler added &#8220;socialist&#8221; to his party&#8217;s name, specifically to confuse<br />
>>>>>>>>>> people.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>> Works to this day.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>> Hitler renamed the Party because he wanted to attract nationalists and<br />
>>>>>>>>> proletarians.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>> Yep. Exactly what I said.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>> Continue espousing Hitler&#8217;s policies, dude&#8230;<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>   You know the <strong>Tea Party</strong> does seem to have many things in common with<br />
>>>>>>> Hitler<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism" >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism</a><br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>  Fascism ( /&#8217;fæ??z?m/) is a radical authoritarian nationalist<br />
>>>>>>> political <strong>ideology</strong>.[1][2] It advocates the creation of a totalitarian<br />
>>>>>>> single-party state that seeks the mass mobilization of a nation<br />
>>>>>>> through discipline, indoctrination, physical education, and family<br />
>>>>>>> policy (such as eugenics).[3][4] This state is led by a supreme leader<br />
>>>>>>> who exercises a dictatorship over the fascist movement, the government<br />
>>>>>>> and other state institutions.[5] Fascist governments forbid and<br />
>>>>>>> suppress opposition.[6] Fascists seek to rejuvenate their nation based<br />
>>>>>>> on commitment to the national community as an organic entity, in which<br />
>>>>>>> individuals are bound together in national identity by suprapersonal<br />
>>>>>>> connections of ancestry, culture, and blood.[7] To achieve this,<br />
>>>>>>> fascists purge forces, ideas, people, and systems deemed to be the<br />
>>>>>>> cause of decadence and degeneration.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>  They have just changed a few words.   <img src='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> )))))<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> Oboobuh has his Purple Shirts and Hitler had his <strong>Brown Shirts</strong>. Obama<br />
>>>>>> wants a civilian army, Hitler had his Hitlerjugend.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> Obama uses the 99% to demonizes the rich, demanding <strong>social</strong> justice.<br />
>><br />
>>>>> The 99% which is almost all of America and of which you belong to.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> Hitler demonized the Jews and used his <strong>Brown Shirts</strong> to cause trouble.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> There is no relative moral equivalence between Conservitive<br />
>>>>>> Republicans and Socialist <strong>Progressives</strong>.<br />
>><br />
>>>>> One wants to help working people, the other wants the wealthy to get<br />
>>>>> wealthier&#8230;<br />
>><br />
>>>>         What BS.<br />
>><br />
>>> And yet, that&#8217;s what the con-servatives are doing &#8211; don&#8217;t tax those poor<br />
>>> poor millionaires!<br />
>><br />
>> You cut the military budget, why would you also tax the rich more?<br />
><br />
> To pay off the debt quicker?  Boy, you&#8217;re stoopid.</p>
<p>Then cutting Government Bureaucracy will also cut the debt quicker,<br />
closing the department of education will help pay off the debt. But you<br />
choke on cutting Government like you want to cut the <strong>Military</strong>.</p>
<p>If you downsize the <strong>Military</strong> by 25% then do that same thing to the<br />
Bureaucrats in the <strong>Federal</strong> government, cut the rest of the <strong>Federal</strong><br />
government by 25%.</p>
<p>If <strong>BIGGER</strong> and more intrusive government were so much better then <strong>NORTH</strong><br />
<strong>KOREA</strong> and even Prisons everywhere would be paradise.</p>
<p>>> You were just crowing about car sales being up&#8230;.  who bought those<br />
>> cars, was it <strong>the poor</strong>?<br />
><br />
> It wasn&#8217;t only millionaires &#8211; they already have all the cars they need<br />
> and more.</p>
<p>Then <strong>GM</strong> has NO market there and they need to fire union workers.</p>
<p>>> You believe in selling cars but you want to take away the <strong>money</strong> people<br />
>> used to buy cars?<br />
><br />
> Are you supposed to be making some sort of sense there?</p>
<p>If you tax the rich more and take their <strong>money</strong> they can&#8217;t buy a car with<br />
<strong>money</strong> they don&#8217;t have&#8230;.  it&#8217;s really simple but then you&#8217;re really stupid.</p>
<p>>> You believe in Austerity when it comes to the <strong>Military</strong> but when it comes<br />
>> to the government <strong>bureaucracy</strong>, you fight any cuts and are against<br />
>> austerity?<br />
><br />
> Government <strong>bureaucracy</strong> needs to grow with the population to serve that<br />
> population effectively, otherwise <strong>increased</strong> delays and inefficiencies<br />
> will result.  You&#8217;re not going to be timely and efficient serving a<br />
> population that has <strong>increased</strong> by 45 million, or by about 15%, in the<br />
> last 15 years if you reduce the <strong>bureaucracy</strong> at the same time by 15%.<br />
> Boy, you&#8217;re stoopid.</p>
<p>The government is there to take care of everyone?</p>
<p>I think I see where you are going wrong.  It takes multiple people to<br />
take care of someone. That means the government will need to be many<br />
times larger than the Private sector that it takes care of.</p>
<p>>> You should NOW be trying to cut the <strong>bureaucracy</strong>, you have cut the<br />
>> military now cut the rest of government.  But no that&#8217;s not what you<br />
>> want because you aren&#8217;t consistent and NOT trying to help America you<br />
>> want to do whet helps the Socialists and cut the <strong>Military</strong> Government<br />
>> that is generally Republican supporters and expand welfare Government<br />
>> that generally supports the Socialists.<br />
><br />
> I think America should cut idiots out of its population.  By removing<br />
> about 90 million of them, the government can then cut back on its<br />
> <strong>bureaucracy</strong> big time.</p>
<p>You Socialists always find a section of the population to cut out and<br />
kill, there&#8217;s always someone that&#8217;s standing between you and your <strong>UTOPIA</strong><br />
that you can blame for all societies problems.</p>
<p>90 million to kill is ambitious, Hitler and <strong>Stalin</strong> and <strong>Mao</strong> killed people<br />
day and night and couldn&#8217;t reach the numbers you seek to achieve.</p>
<p>Do you Socialists have any solution that doesn&#8217;t <strong>include</strong> killing<br />
millions of human lives?</p>
</thendestroyeveryth>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/09/if-bigger-and-more-intrusive-government-were-so-much-better-then-north-korea-and-even-prisons-everywhere-would-be-paradise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do you Socialists have any solution that doesn&#8217;t include killing human life?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/09/do-you-socialists-have-any-solution-that-doesnt-include-killing-human-life/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/09/do-you-socialists-have-any-solution-that-doesnt-include-killing-human-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 20:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brown Shirts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bureaucracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fascism Fascism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[include]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[increased]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mao]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stalin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the poor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utopia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/9/2012 1:28 PM, wy wrote: > On Jan 9, 12:58 pm, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hitler added &#8220;socialist&#8221; to his party&#8217;s name, specifically to confuse >>>>>>>>>> people. >> >>>>>>>>>> Works to this day. >> >>>>>>>>> Hitler renamed the Party because he wanted to attract nationalists and >>>>>>>>> proletarians. >> >>>>>>>> Yep. Exactly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/9/2012 1:28 PM, wy wrote:<br />
> On Jan 9, 12:58 pm, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>> Hitler added &#8220;socialist&#8221; to his party&#8217;s name, specifically to confuse<br />
>>>>>>>>>> people.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>> Works to this day.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>> Hitler renamed the Party because he wanted to attract nationalists and<br />
>>>>>>>>> proletarians.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>> Yep. Exactly what I said.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>> Continue espousing Hitler&#8217;s policies, dude&#8230;<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>   You know the <strong>Tea Party</strong> does seem to have many things in common with<br />
>>>>>>> Hitler<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism" >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism</a><br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>  Fascism ( /&#8217;fæ??z?m/) is a radical authoritarian nationalist<br />
>>>>>>> political <strong>ideology</strong>.[1][2] It advocates the creation of a totalitarian<br />
>>>>>>> single-party state that seeks the mass mobilization of a nation<br />
>>>>>>> through discipline, indoctrination, physical education, and family<br />
>>>>>>> policy (such as eugenics).[3][4] This state is led by a supreme leader<br />
>>>>>>> who exercises a dictatorship over the fascist movement, the government<br />
>>>>>>> and other state institutions.[5] Fascist governments forbid and<br />
>>>>>>> suppress opposition.[6] Fascists seek to rejuvenate their nation based<br />
>>>>>>> on commitment to the national community as an organic entity, in which<br />
>>>>>>> individuals are bound together in national identity by suprapersonal<br />
>>>>>>> connections of ancestry, culture, and blood.[7] To achieve this,<br />
>>>>>>> fascists purge forces, ideas, people, and systems deemed to be the<br />
>>>>>>> cause of decadence and degeneration.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>  They have just changed a few words.   <img src='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> )))))<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> Oboobuh has his Purple Shirts and Hitler had his <strong>Brown Shirts</strong>. Obama<br />
>>>>>> wants a civilian army, Hitler had his Hitlerjugend.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> Obama uses the 99% to demonizes the rich, demanding <strong>social</strong> justice.<br />
>><br />
>>>>> The 99% which is almost all of America and of which you belong to.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> Hitler demonized the Jews and used his <strong>Brown Shirts</strong> to cause trouble.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> There is no relative moral equivalence between Conservitive<br />
>>>>>> Republicans and Socialist <strong>Progressives</strong>.<br />
>><br />
>>>>> One wants to help working people, the other wants the wealthy to get<br />
>>>>> wealthier&#8230;<br />
>><br />
>>>>         What <strong>BS</strong>.<br />
>><br />
>>> And yet, that&#8217;s what the con-servatives are doing &#8211; don&#8217;t tax those poor<br />
>>> poor millionaires!<br />
>><br />
>> You cut the military budget, why would you also tax the rich more?<br />
><br />
> To pay off the debt quicker?  Boy, you&#8217;re stoopid.</p>
<p>Then cutting Government Bureaucracy will also cut the debt quicker,<br />
closing the department of education will help pay off the debt. But you<br />
choke on cutting Government like you want to cut the <strong>Military</strong>.</p>
<p>If you downsize the <strong>Military</strong> by 25% then do that same thing to the<br />
Bureaucrats in the <strong>Federal</strong> government, cut the rest of the <strong>Federal</strong><br />
government by 25%.</p>
<p>>> You were just crowing about car sales being up&#8230;.  who bought those<br />
>> cars, was it <strong>the poor</strong>?<br />
><br />
> It wasn&#8217;t only millionaires &#8211; they already have all the cars they need<br />
> and more.</p>
<p>Then <strong>GM</strong> has NO market there and they need to fire union workers.</p>
<p>>> You believe in selling cars but you want to take away the <strong>money</strong> people<br />
>> used to buy cars?<br />
><br />
> Are you supposed to be making some sort of sense there?</p>
<p>If you tax the rich more and take their <strong>money</strong> they can&#8217;t buy a car with<br />
<strong>money</strong> they don&#8217;t have&#8230;.  it&#8217;s really simple but then you&#8217;re really stupid.</p>
<p>>> You believe in Austerity when it comes to the <strong>Military</strong> but when it comes<br />
>> to the government <strong>bureaucracy</strong>, you fight any cuts and are against<br />
>> austerity?<br />
><br />
> Government <strong>bureaucracy</strong> needs to grow with the population to serve that<br />
> population effectively, otherwise <strong>increased</strong> delays and inefficiencies<br />
> will result.  You&#8217;re not going to be timely and efficient serving a<br />
> population that has <strong>increased</strong> by 45 million, or by about 15%, in the<br />
> last 15 years if you reduce the <strong>bureaucracy</strong> at the same time by 15%.<br />
> Boy, you&#8217;re stoopid.</p>
<p>The government is there to take care of everyone?</p>
<p>I think I see where you are going wrong.  It takes multiple people to<br />
take care of someone. That means the government will need to be many<br />
times larger than the Private sector that it takes care of.</p>
<p>>> You should NOW be trying to cut the <strong>bureaucracy</strong>, you have cut the<br />
>> military now cut the rest of government.  But no that&#8217;s not what you<br />
>> want because you aren&#8217;t consistent and NOT trying to help America you<br />
>> want to do whet helps the Socialists and cut the <strong>Military</strong> Government<br />
>> that is generally Republican supporters and expand <strong>welfare</strong> Government<br />
>> that generally supports the Socialists.<br />
><br />
> I think America should cut idiots out of its population.  By removing<br />
> about 90 million of them, the government can then cut back on its<br />
> <strong>bureaucracy</strong> big time.</p>
<p>You Socialists always find a section of the population to cut out and<br />
kill, there&#8217;s always someone that&#8217;s standing between you and your <strong>UTOPIA</strong><br />
that you can blame for all societies problems.</p>
<p>90 million to kill is ambitious, Hitler and <strong>Stalin</strong> and <strong>Mao</strong> killed people<br />
day and night and couldn&#8217;t reach the numbers you seek to achieve.</p>
<p>Do you Socialists have any solution that doesn&#8217;t <strong>include</strong> killing<br />
millions of human lives?</p>
</thendestroyeveryth>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/09/do-you-socialists-have-any-solution-that-doesnt-include-killing-human-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McCain endorses Romney, Look forward to Newt surging in the polls &#8211;   McCain, McLib, McHealtcare</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/09/mccain-endorses-romney-look-forward-to-newt-surging-in-the-polls-mccain-mclib-mchealtcare-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/09/mccain-endorses-romney-look-forward-to-newt-surging-in-the-polls-mccain-mclib-mchealtcare-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brown Shirts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bureaucracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fascism Fascism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Sat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Thu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the poor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/9/2012 12:39 AM, RichTravsky wrote: > emoneyjoe wrote: >> >> On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 16:25:15 -0700, RichTravsky >> wrote: >> >>> &#8220;CB@PrayForMe.com&#8221; wrote: >>>> >>>> On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 12:28:53 -0800, MattB >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 11:49:38 -0800 (PST), Phlip >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>> Hitler added &#8220;socialist&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/9/2012 12:39 AM, RichTravsky wrote:<br />
> emoneyjoe wrote:<br />
>><br />
>> <strong>On Sat</strong>, 07 Jan 2012 16:25:15 -0700, RichTravsky<br />
>><br />
<trarvesky @hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>> &#8220;<strong>CB</strong>@PrayForMe.com&#8221; wrote:<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> <strong>On Thu</strong>, 05 Jan 2012 12:28:53 -0800, MattB<br />
<trdell1234 @gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:<br />
>>>><br />
>>>>> <strong>On Thu</strong>, 5 Jan 2012 <strong>11</strong>:49:38 -0800 (<strong>PST</strong>), Phlip
<phlip2005 @gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> Hitler added &#8220;socialist&#8221; to his party&#8217;s name, specifically to confuse<br />
>>>>>>>> people.<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> Works to this day.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> Hitler renamed the Party because he wanted to attract nationalists and<br />
>>>>>>> proletarians.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> Yep. Exactly what I said.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> Continue espousing Hitler&#8217;s policies, dude&#8230;<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>>   You know the <strong>Tea Party</strong> does seem to have many things in common with<br />
>>>>> Hitler<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>>  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism" >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism</a><br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>>  Fascism ( /&#8217;fÃ¦??z?m/) is a radical authoritarian nationalist<br />
>>>>> political <strong>ideology</strong>.[1][2] It advocates the creation of a totalitarian<br />
>>>>> single-party state that seeks the mass mobilization of a nation<br />
>>>>> through discipline, indoctrination, physical education, and family<br />
>>>>> policy (such as eugenics).[3][4] This state is led by a supreme leader<br />
>>>>> who exercises a dictatorship over the fascist movement, the government<br />
>>>>> and other state institutions.[5] Fascist governments forbid and<br />
>>>>> suppress opposition.[6] Fascists seek to rejuvenate their nation based<br />
>>>>> on commitment to the national community as an organic entity, in which<br />
>>>>> individuals are bound together in national identity by suprapersonal<br />
>>>>> connections of ancestry, culture, and blood.[7] To achieve this,<br />
>>>>> fascists purge forces, ideas, people, and systems deemed to be the<br />
>>>>> cause of decadence and degeneration.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>>  They have just changed a few words.   <img src='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> )))))<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Oboobuh has his Purple Shirts and Hitler had his <strong>Brown Shirts</strong>. Obama<br />
>>>> wants a civilian army, Hitler had his Hitlerjugend.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Obama uses the 99% to demonizes the rich, demanding <strong>social</strong> justice.<br />
>>><br />
>>> The 99% which is almost all of America and of which you belong to.<br />
>>><br />
>>>> Hitler demonized the Jews and used his <strong>Brown Shirts</strong> to cause trouble.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> There is no relative moral equivalence between Conservitive<br />
>>>> Republicans and Socialist Progressives.<br />
>>><br />
>>> One wants to help working people, the other wants the wealthy to get<br />
>>> wealthier&#8230;<br />
>>><br />
>>         What <strong>BS</strong>.<br />
><br />
> And yet, that&#8217;s what the con-servatives are doing &#8211; don&#8217;t tax those poor<br />
> poor millionaires!</p>
<p>You cut the military budget, why would you also tax the rich more?</p>
<p>You were just crowing about car sales being up&#8230;.  who bought those<br />
cars, was it <strong>the poor</strong>?</p>
<p>You believe in selling cars but you want to take away the <strong>money</strong> people<br />
used to buy cars?</p>
<p>You believe in Austerity when it comes to the <strong>Military</strong> but when it comes<br />
to the government <strong>bureaucracy</strong>, you fight any cuts and are against<br />
austerity?</p>
<p>You should NOW be trying to cut the <strong>bureaucracy</strong>, you have cut the<br />
military now cut the rest of government.  But no that&#8217;s not what you<br />
want because you aren&#8217;t consistent and NOT trying to help America you<br />
want to do whet helps the Socialists and cut the <strong>Military</strong> Government<br />
that is generally Republican supporters and expand <strong>welfare</strong> Government<br />
that generally supports the Socialists.</p>
<p>You are anti America and <strong>PRO</strong> Socialist.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s real easy to see who you are.</p>
</phlip2005></trdell1234></trarvesky>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/09/mccain-endorses-romney-look-forward-to-newt-surging-in-the-polls-mccain-mclib-mchealtcare-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It began when Obama threatened industry with social justice</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/04/it-began-when-obama-threatened-industry-with-social-justice/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/04/it-began-when-obama-threatened-industry-with-social-justice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 23:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[43]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lamont Cranston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Tue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=26920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/4/2012 5:47 PM, Lamont Cranston wrote: > On 1/4/2012 2:02 PM, CB @&#038;*$?%PrayForMe.com wrote: >> On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:07:43 -0800, Lamont Cranston >> wrote: >> >>> On 1/3/2012 3:17 PM, CB @&#038;*$?%PrayForMe.com wrote: >>> >>> Hussein? He was hung in Iraq. How did you miss it? >> >> What&#8217;s Oboobuh&#8217;s middle name? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/4/2012 5:47 PM, <strong>Lamont Cranston</strong> wrote:<br />
> On 1/4/2012 2:02 PM, <a href="mailto:CB<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>PrayForMe.com">CB<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>PrayForMe.com</a> wrote:<br />
>> <strong>On Tue</strong>, 03 Jan 2012 17:07:<strong>43</strong> -0800, <strong>Lamont Cranston</strong><br />
>> <fightingforjustice @avatar.org>  wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>> On 1/3/2012 3:17 PM, <a href="mailto:CB<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>PrayForMe.com">CB<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>PrayForMe.com</a> wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>> Hussein?  He was hung in <strong>Iraq</strong>.  How did you miss it?<br />
>><br />
>> What&#8217;s Oboobuh&#8217;s middle name?<br />
><br />
> I have never heard of anybody named &#8220;Oboobuh.&#8221;</p>
<p>You lead a sheltered life!</p>
<p></fightingforjustice></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/04/it-began-when-obama-threatened-industry-with-social-justice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Black Church Rightful Owner of KKK Store</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/04/black-church-rightful-owner-of-kkk-store/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/04/black-church-rightful-owner-of-kkk-store/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Encyclopedia Britannica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FACTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KKK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ku Klux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Progressive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soldiers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=26878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/3/2012 11:36 PM, Dakota wrote: > On 1/3/2012 6:24 PM, Topaz wrote: >> >> >> Here are some quotes from the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica >> after the heading Ku Klux Klan: >> >> &#8220;Ku Klux Klan, the name of an American secret association of Southern >> whites united for self-protection and to oppose the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/3/2012 <strong>11</strong>:36 PM, Dakota wrote:<br />
> On 1/3/2012 6:24 PM, Topaz wrote:<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>           Here are some quotes from the 1911 <strong>Encyclopedia Britannica</strong><br />
>> after the heading <strong>Ku Klux</strong> Klan:<br />
>><br />
>> &#8220;<strong>Ku Klux</strong> Klan, the name of an American secret association of Southern<br />
>> whites united for self-protection and to oppose the Reconstruction<br />
>> measures of the <strong>United States</strong> <strong>Congress</strong>&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>>      &#8220;The various causes assigned for the origin and development of<br />
>> this movement were: the absence of stable government in the South for<br />
>> several years after the Civil <strong>War</strong>; the corrupt and tyrannical <strong>rule</strong> of<br />
>> the alien, renegade and negro, and the belief that it was supported by<br />
>> the <strong>Federal</strong> troops which controlled elections and legislative bodies;<br />
>> the disfranchisement of whites; the spread of ideas of <strong>social</strong> and<br />
>> political equality among the negroes; fear of negro insurrections; the<br />
>> arming of negro militia and the disarming of whites; outrages upon<br />
>> white women by black men&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>>         &#8220;The constitutions and rituals of these secret orders have<br />
>> declarations of principles, of which the following are characteristic:<br />
>> to protect and succour the weak and unfortunate, especially the widows<br />
>> and orphans of Confederate <strong>soldiers</strong>; to protect members of the white<br />
>> race in life, honour and property from the encroachments of the<br />
>> blacks&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>>        &#8220;To control the negro the Klan played upon his superstitious<br />
>> fears by having night patrols, parades and drills of silent horsemen<br />
>> covered with white sheets, carrying skulls with coals of fire for<br />
>> eyes&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>> &#8220;the <strong>Ku Klux</strong> movement went on until it accomplished its object by<br />
>> giving protection to the whites, reducing the blacks to order,<br />
>> replacing the whites in control of society and state, expelling the<br />
>> worst of the carpet-baggers and scalawags, and nullifying those laws<br />
>> of <strong>Congress</strong> which had resulted in placing the Southern whites under<br />
>> the control of a party composed principally of ex-slaves.&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>> <a href="http://www.ihr.org/" >http://www.ihr.org/</a>     <a href="http://www.natvan.com" >http://www.natvan.com</a><br />
>><br />
>> <a href="http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com" >http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com</a><br />
><br />
> Gee. A <strong>racist</strong> article and links to three kook sites. You must be an<br />
> <strong>racist</strong> moron. Please don&#8217;t vote. Please don&#8217;t breed. Plonk. Bye now.</p>
<p>Since when is quoting the <strong>FACTS</strong> a <strong>racist</strong> act?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the <strong>Liberal Progressive</strong>&#8230;..  you just call what ever you want,<br />
to be <strong>racist</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/04/black-church-rightful-owner-of-kkk-store/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ranks #1 Most Charitable Nation In The World &#8211; Contrary to what Progressives would like you to believe</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/27/ranks-1-most-charitable-nation-in-the-world-contrary-to-what-progressives-would-like-you-to-believe/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/27/ranks-1-most-charitable-nation-in-the-world-contrary-to-what-progressives-would-like-you-to-believe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 14:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[23]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[43]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Billy Bob]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charities Aid Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Giving Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HATE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Tue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Hawking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worldview World Poll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=26586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 12/27/2011 9:47 AM, wy wrote: > On Dec 27, 9:42 am, Steve wrote: >> On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 05:37:57 -0800 (PST), wy wrote: >>> On Dec 27, 7:47 am, Steve wrote: >>>> On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 03:53:43 -0800 (PST), wy wrote: >>>>> On Dec 27, 6:30 am, Steve wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 12/27/2011 9:47 AM, wy wrote:<br />
> On Dec 27, 9:42 am, Steve <stevencan ...@yahooooo.com> wrote:<br />
>> <strong>On Tue</strong>, 27 Dec 2011 05:37:57 -0800 (<strong>PST</strong>), wy <w ...@myself.com> wrote:<br />
>>> On Dec 27, 7:47 am, Steve <stevencan ...@yahooooo.com> wrote:<br />
>>>> <strong>On Tue</strong>, 27 Dec 2011 03:53:<strong>43</strong> -0800 (<strong>PST</strong>), wy <w ...@myself.com> wrote:<br />
>>>>> On Dec 27, 6:30 am, Steve <stevencan ...@yahooooo.com> wrote:<br />
>>>>>> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 18:<strong>23</strong>:38 -0800 (<strong>PST</strong>), wy <w ...@myself.com> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> On Dec 26, 8:16 pm, Vandar <vanda ...@yahoo.com> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>> wy wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>> On Dec 26, 5:53 pm, Vandar </vanda><vanda ...@yahoo.com> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>> wy wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 26, <strong>10</strong>:35 am, Vandar </vanda><vanda ...@yahoo.com> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> wy wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 26, 8:30 am, &#8220;C&#8230;@PrayForMe.com&#8221; <c ...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> USA: Ranks <a href='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/1/' rel='tag' class="hashtag">#1</a> Most Charitable Nation In The World<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By Mark Perry on December 26, <a href="2011http://www.dailymarkets.com/economy/2011/12/26/usa-ranks-1-most-chari..." >2011http://www.dailymarkets.com/economy/2011/12/26/usa-ranks-1-most-chari&#8230;</a><br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <strong>Charities Aid Foundation</strong> (a <strong>UK</strong> international charity): “This is the<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> second edition of the ‘World <strong>Giving Index</strong>’, the largest study into<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> charitable behavior across the globe involving 153 countries in total.<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Using data from Gallup’s <strong>Worldview World Poll</strong>, the report is based on<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> three measures of giving behavior – giving <strong>money</strong>, volunteering time<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and helping a stranger.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The results show that the USA is officially the most charitable nation<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the world, moving from fifth place last year to first place this<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> year. Ireland is the second most charitable country and Australia the<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> third. Overall the World <strong>Giving Index</strong>, demonstrates that the world has<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> become a more charitable place over the last 12 months – with a 2%<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> increase in the global population ‘helping a stranger’ and a 1%<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> increase in people volunteering.”<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not so fast, <strong>Billy Bob</strong>.  If you had actually looked at the real report<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>> which you didn&#8217;t, you&#8217;d see the <strong>US</strong> doesn&#8217;t do that great at all.  The<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <strong>Giving Index</strong> reflects all forms of giving, like volunteering and<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>> helping strangers, not just spending <strong>money</strong>.  If you restrict it simply<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to spending <strong>money</strong>, then the <strong>US</strong> is shamefully greedy, not proudly<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>> giving.  In terms of cash, only 65% of Americans supposedly give their<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <strong>money</strong> away.  In Thailand, of all places, it&#8217;s 85% of the population,<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>> placing it firmly at No. 1 and the <strong>US</strong> at No. <strong>11</strong>.  The reason why the<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <strong>US</strong> comes in at No. 1 overall is because of higher rates of<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>> volunteering and helping strangers because Americans are too stingy<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>> with parting with their cash and that it&#8217;s cheaper for them to<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>> volunteer and help strangers.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> And what&#8217;s <strong>Canada</strong>&#8216;s excuse?<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> Charity consists of more than just cutting a check.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>> We&#8217;ve got a broader range of <strong>social</strong> programs than the <strong>US</strong> to help out<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> the needy, paid for by taxpayers.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>> Taxpayer funded <strong>social</strong> programs aren&#8217;t charity.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>> Sure it is.  You don&#8217;t understand the concept of socialism.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>> You don&#8217;t understand the concept of charity. Which isn&#8217;t a surprise.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>> Again proving you don&#8217;t understand the concept of socialism.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> Socialism is easy to understand&#8230;   it&#8217;s all about the government<br />
>>>>>> forcing successful people to foot the bills of you losers.<br />
>><br />
>>>>> Yeah, that&#8217;s why 9 of the top <strong>10</strong> happiest countries are socialist<br />
>>>>> countries.  The <strong>US</strong> &#8211; the greatest country in the world! &#8211; is<br />
>>>>> shamefully in 10th place.<br />
>><br />
>>>> Socialist countries have the highest percentage of losers.. Socialists<br />
>>>> are losers&#8230;.    Look at you, for instance&#8230;   you&#8217;re claiming to be<br />
>>>> happy driving your 13 year old, bumper dragging heap&#8230;   Too bad that<br />
>>>> your goals are so low,<br />
>><br />
>>> Well, at least my claim is more realistic than yours.  Yours doesn&#8217;t<br />
>>> even cut it as a convincing fantasy.<br />
>><br />
>> Your claim describes a loser&#8217;s life&#8230;<br />
>><br />
>>>>> <a href="http://www.forbes.com/pictures/mef45ejmi/02-denmark/" >http://www.forbes.com/pictures/mef45ejmi/02-denmark/</a><br />
>><br />
>>>>> You just don&#8217;t know how miserable you really are.  I guess one can<br />
>>>>> only see it by being outside of the <strong>US</strong>.<br />
>><br />
>>>> Here&#8217;s hoping you stay out, too..   The <strong>US</strong> already has enough losers<br />
>>>> like you.<br />
>><br />
>>> Yeah, and it amounts to more than the total population of <strong>Canada</strong> these<br />
>>> days.<br />
>><br />
>> You losers are everywhere&#8230;   but on the other <strong>hand</strong>, I see successful<br />
>> Americans like me every day, driving our late model cars and trucks<br />
>> from our nice homes in the burbs to offices downtown&#8230;  course I&#8217;m<br />
>> not going to work.<br />
><br />
> Oh no, there go the drugs again.  They&#8217;re more potent this time,<br />
> aren&#8217;t they?<br />
><br />
><br />
>> I&#8217;m retired&#8230;..<br />
><br />
> Meaning you&#8217;re old and fat and losing your hair and teeth.</p>
<p>And this means &#8220;you&#8221; are profiling and exposing your <strong>HATE</strong>.</p>
<p>Do you understand how those old people managed to get old?</p>
<p>Have you decided to die before you get old?  Since you hate it/them so<br />
much it would be wise to make sure you don&#8217;t suffer the shame of being<br />
fat or a wrinkle on your face or a story of how you succeed or failed by<br />
working hard.</p>
<p>You need to make sure that you have a plan get out of the hell you<br />
described as old age and make sure you don&#8217;t fail.   Make us all happy<br />
and die young!</p>
<p></c></vanda></w></stevencan></w></stevencan></w></stevencan></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/27/ranks-1-most-charitable-nation-in-the-world-contrary-to-what-progressives-would-like-you-to-believe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can you find the non-Hispanic white kid in the photo?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/17/can-you-find-the-non-hispanic-white-kid-in-the-photo/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/17/can-you-find-the-non-hispanic-white-kid-in-the-photo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 21:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dream Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=26194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 12/17/2011 3:39 PM, J&#038;*$?%a wrote: > > > &#8220; R&#038;*$?%d&#8221; wrote in message news:9l49lkFk8cU1 @&#038;*$?%mid.individual.net&#8230; > > J&#038;*$?%a wrote >> walt tonne wrote Hisler wrote > >>> The &#8220;I have a Dream Foundation&#8221; is featured in this article in the >>> local Boulder newspaper. I noticed that the comments following the >>> article ask [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 12/17/2011 3:39 PM, <acronym title="Jerry Okamura"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> J&*$?%a</span></acronym> wrote:<br />
><br />
><br />
> &#8220;<acronym title="Rod Speed"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> R&*$?%d</span></acronym>&#8221;  wrote in message news:9l49lkFk8cU1<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>mid.individual.net&#8230;<br />
><br />
> <acronym title="Jerry Okamura"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> J&*$?%a</span></acronym> wrote<br />
>> walt tonne  wrote Hisler <his ...@<acronym title="cocks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%s</span></acronym>.net> wrote<br />
><br />
>>> The &#8220;I have a <strong>Dream Foundation</strong>&#8221; is featured in this article in the<br />
>>> local Boulder newspaper.  I noticed that the comments following the<br />
>>> article ask stuff like &#8220;is this for Mexicans?&#8221; or &#8220;is being an<br />
>>> illegal immigrant a requirement for free stuff.&#8221;  Americans are<br />
>>> waking up and seeing how so many foundations, charities and churches<br />
>>> are now directing all their efforts at helping illegal aliens in<br />
>>> their demographic war against American citizens.<br />
><br />
>>> <a href="http://www.dailycamera.com/boulder-county-news/ci_19559539?source=rss" >http://www.dailycamera.com/boulder-county-news/ci_19559539?source=rss</a><br />
><br />
>> Removing all illegal aliens would unleash an economic and <strong>social</strong><br />
>> renaissance.<br />
><br />
> Fantasy.<br />
><br />
> It would drastically slash consumer spending, because all those wouldnt<br />
> be spending anymore.<br />
><br />
>> And how do we do that?<br />
><br />
> Not even possible.<br />
><br />
> Even if the cops demanded proof that you werent an illegal in house to<br />
> house searches, it just<br />
> wouldnt work, there are just too many of them and no one will spend what<br />
> it would cost anyway.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s NOT what you say about drugs and it is the same reality&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>Do you give up on religion being practiced on government property?  For<br />
some reason those two are too important to ignore but the illegals are<br />
just too many so you can ignore it.</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t you just stop enforcing laws on <strong>guns</strong>, it is hopeless to stop<br />
people from buying the <strong>guns</strong> they want, you gave up on illegals and yet<br />
you chase illegals that buy <strong>guns</strong>&#8230;&#8230;.  oooopppssss &#8220;my bad&#8221; you don&#8217;t<br />
chase illegals that buy <strong>guns</strong> you only chase American citizens that buy<br />
<strong>guns</strong>.   My proof is &#8220;Fast and Furious&#8221;.</p>
<p>> So, why are our politicians trying to solve a problem, that cannot be<br />
> solved, the way they are trying to solve the problem?</p>
<p>Why did the Socialist cross the road? Because all his other freedoms had<br />
already been stolen under the guise of protecting him from every other<br />
danger.</p>
<p></his></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/17/can-you-find-the-non-hispanic-white-kid-in-the-photo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>( Capitalist America)  vs  (Socialist America)</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/09/capitalist-america-vs-socialist-america/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/09/capitalist-america-vs-socialist-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 20:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMERICAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHEAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COMPUTERS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIVIDES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GETTING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOVERNMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOTHING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PORNOGRAPHY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PRODUCED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=25792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Making everyone responsible and partners and dependent on success of the Nation(They live in Capitalist America) THE REST GETTING FREE GOVERNMENT MONEY(They live in Socialist America). On 12/9/2011 1:54 PM, columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote: > On Dec 9, 9:38 am, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: >> On 12/8/2011 11:45 PM, columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote: >> >>> On Dec 8, 8:24 pm, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Making everyone responsible and partners and dependent on success of the<br />
Nation(They live in <strong>Capitalist</strong> America) THE <strong>REST</strong> <strong>GETTING</strong> FREE <strong>GOVERNMENT</strong><br />
<strong>MONEY</strong>(They live in Socialist America).</p>
<p>On 12/9/2011 1:54 PM, columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote:<br />
> On Dec 9, 9:38 am, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>> On 12/8/2011 <strong>11</strong>:45 PM, columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>> On Dec 8, 8:24 pm, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>>> </thendestroyeveryth>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>>> <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/alt.global-warming/msg/5a79bfb7fd8ce74b" >http://groups.google.com/group/alt.global-warming/msg/5a79bfb7fd8ce74b</a><br />
>><br />
>>> laughing, wow i suspect gingrich will break/melt down in the same<br />
>>> manner you did above, when he is confronted with his own idiocy.<br />
>><br />
>> How much income and sales and other miscellaneous tax did you pay this<br />
>> month so that you could buy your cable <strong>TV</strong>&#8230;.<br />
>><br />
>> How much did the actual cable service cost, not including the tax you<br />
>> paid when you earned the money and when you spent the money.<br />
>><br />
>> You paid<br />
>><br />
>> Income tax  20-38%<br />
>> <strong>SS</strong> tax 7.5%<br />
>> medicare tax  2%<br />
>> <strong>unemployment</strong> tax ?<br />
>> state income tax 7%<br />
>> state sales tax 8%<br />
>> corporate income&#8230;. tax a reasonable 8% profit at 35%<br />
>> misc tele-comm tax 7%<br />
>><br />
>> You had to earn enough money to pay all these <strong>taxes</strong> for the privilege of<br />
>> buying your cable.<br />
>><br />
>> take your cable bill and calculate what each cost you.<br />
>><br />
>> Then deduct it from your cable bill, what is left is what actual cable<br />
>> with NO government costs.</p>
<p>> First, you are *assuming* that reduction of fixed costs associated<br />
> with an entity would 100% directly translate to reduction of a price<br />
> charged for a service, that is very doubtful.</p>
<p>NO, I was showing you how much tax you pay&#8230;..   by showing how much<br />
you have to earn, to pay for $100 of product.</p>
<p>Not that the price was going to be more or less dependent on <strong>taxes</strong> being<br />
more or less.  You are out in the weeds with your suggestion.</p>
<p>The problem is government NOT the corporation.</p>
<p>> In my opinion the first<br />
> thing that would likely happen is such reductions would be factored<br />
> into market expectations i.e. performance per <strong>share</strong>.</p>
<p>Why do I care? I was showing you one thing, your fear took you down this<br />
road.</p>
<p>> You have not<br />
> produced a reduced price schedule from a company based on such a tax<br />
> scheme, you only have theoretical market responses offered by<br />
> political hacks or right wing think tanks.</p>
<p>I predict <strong>NOTHING</strong>&#8230;   I was showing how many dollars you had to earn so<br />
that you could buy $100 of product.</p>
<p>I did it for mine and I need to earn $150 to buy $92 worth of cable <strong>TV</strong>.</p>
<p>That is about a 50% tax rate.</p>
<p>>  Secondly, reduction of<br />
> government revenues would have a negative impact by shrinking the<br />
> <strong>social</strong> safety net during a time of global recession.</p>
<p>Are you sure?  Why would you be so defensive when I was simply showing<br />
you what part of that product is NOT the cost of the product but is the<br />
cost of government.   You must be worried at the conclusion others will<br />
take from this fact.</p>
<p>>  Maintaining a<br />
> strong <strong>social</strong> safety net keeps a workforce employable, and able to<br />
> market their skills in todays information based workplace when the<br />
> economy picks up.</p>
<p>It also holds back the economy.</p>
<p>> Thirdly the infrastructure used by corporations<br />
> (internet, and non-internet) to conduct commerce is possible because<br />
> of the national investments made from the tax revenues you want to<br />
> eliminate.</p>
<p>Texas instruments created the technology&#8230;..   Computers are NOT<br />
government and neither is <strong>TV</strong> or telephone and neither is manned flight.<br />
<strong>CHEAP</strong> <strong>COMPUTERS</strong> WERE NOT <strong>GOVERNMENT</strong> <strong>PRODUCED</strong> but<br />
*without cheap computers* there would be NO private sector internet.<br />
Which came first, the chicken or the egg?</p>
<p>Government stole the technology and used it poorly and tried to make an<br />
indestructible military network.  That &#8220;plan&#8221; or idea was expanded and<br />
improved and redesigned by the private market and <strong>PORNOGRAPHY</strong> and became<br />
the internet.  So before you spread the LIE that government created<br />
everything, remember that they stole most of it from private industry.</p>
<p>The government pays the private sector to build their stuff because<br />
Government hasn&#8217;t got the smarts to make the things they ask for.</p>
<p>Who invented DRONES&#8230;..  was it R/C model airplane builders or<br />
government?</p>
<p>> Elimination of such revenues would reduce the ability to<br />
> invest and repair infrastructure.</p>
<p>And eliminate waste and theft and misuse.</p>
<p>Obama already got trillions of tax dollars to repair infrastructure and<br />
he has <strong>NOTHING</strong> to show for it and wants trillions more for<br />
infrastructure to fix what he has already been paid to fix but didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>> Lastly, elimination of state sales<br />
> tax in states like california would be devastating to local schools,</p>
<p>Yet raising and adding <strong>taxes</strong> doesn&#8217;t devastate &#8220;Private business&#8221; and<br />
the private sector economy?  Interesting how YOU BELIEVE that <strong>taxes</strong> are<br />
a one way street.  Taxes are GOOD for everyone?   Taxes can&#8217;t devastate<br />
the private sector but less <strong>taxes</strong> will absolutely devastate the<br />
government?</p>
<p>*What a crock of <acronym title="shit"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> s&*$?%t</span></acronym> you are peddling*</p>
<p>> and public services.  Your type of economics favors the very wealthy,<br />
> and hurts our country.</p>
<p>MY PLANS help the Nation while making everyone responsible and partners<br />
and dependent on success of the Nation(They live in <strong>Capitalist</strong> America).</p>
<p>Your plan <strong>DIVIDES</strong> THE <strong>NATION</strong> and makes half the Nation have zero<br />
interest in the economy and the success of the National economy because<br />
they get government money regardless of economic health(They live in<br />
Socialist America).</p>
<p>John Edwards was correct, there are TWO <strong>AMERICAS</strong>, he was wrong on what<br />
they are.  One is <strong>Capitalist</strong> America where we participate in the<br />
economy, the other America is Socialist America where they Live off the<br />
Government.</p>
</thendestroyeveryth>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/09/capitalist-america-vs-socialist-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>making everyone responsible and partners and dependent on success of the Nation(They live in Capitalist America) THE REST GETTING FREE GOVERNMENT MONEY(They live in Socialist America).</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/09/making-everyone-responsible-and-partners-and-dependent-on-success-of-the-nationthey-live-in-capitalist-america-the-rest-getting-free-government-moneythey-live-in-socialist-america/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/09/making-everyone-responsible-and-partners-and-dependent-on-success-of-the-nationthey-live-in-capitalist-america-the-rest-getting-free-government-moneythey-live-in-socialist-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 19:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMERICAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIVIDES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FREE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GETTING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOOD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOVERNMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOTHING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLANS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PORNOGRAPHY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TWO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=25788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Making everyone responsible and partners and dependent on success of the Nation(They live in Capitalist America) THE REST GETTING FREE GOVERNMENT MONEY(They live in Socialist America). On 12/9/2011 1:54 PM, columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote: > On Dec 9, 9:38 am, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: >> On 12/8/2011 11:45 PM, columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote: >> >>> On Dec 8, 8:24 pm, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Making everyone responsible and partners and dependent on success of the<br />
Nation(They live in <strong>Capitalist</strong> America) THE <strong>REST</strong> <strong>GETTING</strong> <strong>FREE</strong> <strong>GOVERNMENT</strong><br />
<strong>MONEY</strong>(They live in Socialist America).</p>
<p>On 12/9/2011 1:54 PM, columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote:<br />
> On Dec 9, 9:38 am, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>> On 12/8/2011 11:45 PM, columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>> On Dec 8, 8:24 pm, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>>> </thendestroyeveryth>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>>> <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/alt.global-warming/msg/5a79bfb7fd8ce74b" >http://groups.google.com/group/alt.global-warming/msg/5a79bfb7fd8ce74b</a><br />
>><br />
>>> laughing, wow i suspect gingrich will break/melt down in the same<br />
>>> manner you did above, when he is confronted with his own idiocy.<br />
>><br />
>> How much income and sales and other miscellaneous tax did you pay this<br />
>> month so that you could buy your cable <strong>TV</strong>&#8230;.<br />
>><br />
>> How much did the actual cable service cost, not including the tax you<br />
>> paid when you earned the money and when you spent the money.<br />
>><br />
>> You paid<br />
>><br />
>> Income tax  20-38%<br />
>> <strong>SS</strong> tax 7.5%<br />
>> medicare tax  2%<br />
>> <strong>unemployment</strong> tax ?<br />
>> state income tax 7%<br />
>> state sales tax 8%<br />
>> corporate income&#8230;. tax a reasonable 8% profit at 35%<br />
>> misc tele-comm tax 7%<br />
>><br />
>> You had to earn enough money to pay all these <strong>taxes</strong> for the privilege of<br />
>> buying your cable.<br />
>><br />
>> take your cable bill and calculate what each cost you.<br />
>><br />
>> Then deduct it from your cable bill, what is left is what actual cable<br />
>> with NO government costs.</p>
<p>> First, you are *assuming* that reduction of fixed costs associated<br />
> with an entity would 100% directly translate to reduction of a price<br />
> charged for a service, that is very doubtful.</p>
<p>NO, I was showing you how much tax you pay&#8230;..   by showing how much<br />
you have to earn, to pay for $100 of product.</p>
<p>Not that the price was going to be more or less dependent on <strong>taxes</strong> being<br />
more or less.  You are out in the weeds with your suggestion.</p>
<p>> In my opinion the first<br />
> thing that would likely happen is such reductions would be factored<br />
> into market expectations i.e. performance per <strong>share</strong>.</p>
<p>Why do I care? I was showing you one thing, your fear took you down this<br />
road.</p>
<p>> You have not<br />
> produced a reduced price schedule from a company based on such a tax<br />
> scheme, you only have theoretical market responses offered by<br />
> political hacks or right wing think tanks.</p>
<p>I predict <strong>NOTHING</strong>&#8230;   I was showing how many dollars you earned so that<br />
you could buy $100 of product.</p>
<p>I did it for mine and I need to ear $150 to buy $92 worth of cable <strong>TV</strong>.</p>
<p>That is about 50% tax rate.</p>
<p>>  Secondly, reduction of<br />
> government revenues would have a negative impact by shrinking the<br />
> <strong>social</strong> safety net during a time of global recession.</p>
<p>Are you sure?  Why would you be so defensive when I was simply showing<br />
you what part of that product is NOT the cost of the product but is the<br />
cost of government.   You must be worried at the conclusion others will<br />
take from this fact.</p>
<p>>  Maintaining a<br />
> strong <strong>social</strong> safety net keeps a workforce employable, and able to<br />
> market their skills in todays information based workplace when the<br />
> economy picks up.</p>
<p>It also holds back the economy.</p>
<p>> Thirdly the infrastructure used by corporations<br />
> (internet, and non-internet) to conduct commerce is possible because<br />
> of the national investments made from the tax revenues you want to<br />
> eliminate.</p>
<p>Texas instruments created the technology&#8230;..   Computers are NOT<br />
government and neither is <strong>TV</strong> or telephone and neither is manned flight.</p>
<p>Government stole the technology and used it poorly and tried to make an<br />
indestructible military network.  That plan was expanded and improved<br />
and redesigned by the private market and <strong>PORNOGRAPHY</strong> and became the<br />
internet.  So before you spread the LIE that government created<br />
everything, remember that they stole most of it from private industry.</p>
<p>The government pay the private sector to build their stuff because<br />
Government hasn&#8217;t got the smart to make the things they ask for.</p>
<p>> Elimination of such revenues would reduce the ability to<br />
> invest and repair infrastructure.</p>
<p>And eliminate waste and theft and misuse.</p>
<p>Obama got trillions of tax dollars to repair infrastructure and he has<br />
<strong>NOTHING</strong> to show for it and wants trillions more for infrastructure to<br />
fix what he has already been paid to fix but didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>> Lastly, elimination of state sales<br />
> tax in states like california would be devastating to local schools,</p>
<p>Yet raising and adding <strong>taxes</strong> doesn&#8217;t devastate &#8220;Private business&#8221; and<br />
the private sector economy?  Interesting how YOU BELIEVE that <strong>taxes</strong> are<br />
a one way street.  Taxes are <strong>GOOD</strong> for everyone?</p>
<p>> and public services.  Your type of economics favors the very wealthy,<br />
> and hurts our country.</p>
<p>MY <strong>PLANS</strong> help the Nation while making everyone responsible and partners<br />
and dependent on success of the Nation(They live in <strong>Capitalist</strong> America).</p>
<p>Your plan <strong>DIVIDES</strong> THE <strong>NATION</strong> and makes half the Nation have zero<br />
interest in the economy and the success of the National economy because<br />
they get government money regardless of economic health(They live in<br />
Socialist America).</p>
<p>John Edwards was correct, there are <strong>TWO</strong> <strong>AMERICAS</strong>, he was wrong on what<br />
they are.  One is <strong>Capitalist</strong> America where we participate in the<br />
economy, the other America is Socialist America where they Live off the<br />
Government.</p>
</thendestroyeveryth>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/09/making-everyone-responsible-and-partners-and-dependent-on-success-of-the-nationthey-live-in-capitalist-america-the-rest-getting-free-government-moneythey-live-in-socialist-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>making everyone responsible and partners and dependent on success of the Nation(They live in Capitalist America) THE REST GETTING FREE GOVERNMENT MONEY(They live in Socialist America).</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/09/making-everyone-responsible-and-partners-and-dependent-on-success-of-the-nationthey-live-in-capitalist-america-the-rest-getting-free-government-moneythey-live-in-socialist-america-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/09/making-everyone-responsible-and-partners-and-dependent-on-success-of-the-nationthey-live-in-capitalist-america-the-rest-getting-free-government-moneythey-live-in-socialist-america-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 19:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMERICAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIVIDES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FREE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GETTING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOOD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOVERNMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOTHING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLANS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PORNOGRAPHY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TWO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=25790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Making everyone responsible and partners and dependent on success of the Nation(They live in Capitalist America) THE REST GETTING FREE GOVERNMENT MONEY(They live in Socialist America). On 12/9/2011 1:54 PM, columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote: > On Dec 9, 9:38 am, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: >> On 12/8/2011 11:45 PM, columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote: >> >>> On Dec 8, 8:24 pm, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Making everyone responsible and partners and dependent on success of the<br />
Nation(They live in <strong>Capitalist</strong> America) THE <strong>REST</strong> <strong>GETTING</strong> <strong>FREE</strong> <strong>GOVERNMENT</strong><br />
<strong>MONEY</strong>(They live in Socialist America).</p>
<p>On 12/9/2011 1:54 PM, columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote:<br />
> On Dec 9, 9:38 am, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>> On 12/8/2011 11:45 PM, columbiaaccidentinvestigation wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>> On Dec 8, 8:24 pm, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>>> </thendestroyeveryth>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>>> <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/alt.global-warming/msg/5a79bfb7fd8ce74b" >http://groups.google.com/group/alt.global-warming/msg/5a79bfb7fd8ce74b</a><br />
>><br />
>>> laughing, wow i suspect gingrich will break/melt down in the same<br />
>>> manner you did above, when he is confronted with his own idiocy.<br />
>><br />
>> How much income and sales and other miscellaneous tax did you pay this<br />
>> month so that you could buy your cable <strong>TV</strong>&#8230;.<br />
>><br />
>> How much did the actual cable service cost, not including the tax you<br />
>> paid when you earned the money and when you spent the money.<br />
>><br />
>> You paid<br />
>><br />
>> Income tax  20-38%<br />
>> <strong>SS</strong> tax 7.5%<br />
>> medicare tax  2%<br />
>> <strong>unemployment</strong> tax ?<br />
>> state income tax 7%<br />
>> state sales tax 8%<br />
>> corporate income&#8230;. tax a reasonable 8% profit at 35%<br />
>> misc tele-comm tax 7%<br />
>><br />
>> You had to earn enough money to pay all these <strong>taxes</strong> for the privilege of<br />
>> buying your cable.<br />
>><br />
>> take your cable bill and calculate what each cost you.<br />
>><br />
>> Then deduct it from your cable bill, what is left is what actual cable<br />
>> with NO government costs.</p>
<p>> First, you are *assuming* that reduction of fixed costs associated<br />
> with an entity would 100% directly translate to reduction of a price<br />
> charged for a service, that is very doubtful.</p>
<p>NO, I was showing you how much tax you pay&#8230;..   by showing how much<br />
you have to earn, to pay for $100 of product.</p>
<p>Not that the price was going to be more or less dependent on <strong>taxes</strong> being<br />
more or less.  You are out in the weeds with your suggestion.</p>
<p>> In my opinion the first<br />
> thing that would likely happen is such reductions would be factored<br />
> into market expectations i.e. performance per <strong>share</strong>.</p>
<p>Why do I care? I was showing you one thing, your fear took you down this<br />
road.</p>
<p>> You have not<br />
> produced a reduced price schedule from a company based on such a tax<br />
> scheme, you only have theoretical market responses offered by<br />
> political hacks or right wing think tanks.</p>
<p>I predict <strong>NOTHING</strong>&#8230;   I was showing how many dollars you earned so that<br />
you could buy $100 of product.</p>
<p>I did it for mine and I need to ear $150 to buy $92 worth of cable <strong>TV</strong>.</p>
<p>That is about 50% tax rate.</p>
<p>>  Secondly, reduction of<br />
> government revenues would have a negative impact by shrinking the<br />
> <strong>social</strong> safety net during a time of global recession.</p>
<p>Are you sure?  Why would you be so defensive when I was simply showing<br />
you what part of that product is NOT the cost of the product but is the<br />
cost of government.   You must be worried at the conclusion others will<br />
take from this fact.</p>
<p>>  Maintaining a<br />
> strong <strong>social</strong> safety net keeps a workforce employable, and able to<br />
> market their skills in todays information based workplace when the<br />
> economy picks up.</p>
<p>It also holds back the economy.</p>
<p>> Thirdly the infrastructure used by corporations<br />
> (internet, and non-internet) to conduct commerce is possible because<br />
> of the national investments made from the tax revenues you want to<br />
> eliminate.</p>
<p>Texas instruments created the technology&#8230;..   Computers are NOT<br />
government and neither is <strong>TV</strong> or telephone and neither is manned flight.</p>
<p>Government stole the technology and used it poorly and tried to make an<br />
indestructible military network.  That plan was expanded and improved<br />
and redesigned by the private market and <strong>PORNOGRAPHY</strong> and became the<br />
internet.  So before you spread the LIE that government created<br />
everything, remember that they stole most of it from private industry.</p>
<p>The government pay the private sector to build their stuff because<br />
Government hasn&#8217;t got the smart to make the things they ask for.</p>
<p>> Elimination of such revenues would reduce the ability to<br />
> invest and repair infrastructure.</p>
<p>And eliminate waste and theft and misuse.</p>
<p>Obama got trillions of tax dollars to repair infrastructure and he has<br />
<strong>NOTHING</strong> to show for it and wants trillions more for infrastructure to<br />
fix what he has already been paid to fix but didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>> Lastly, elimination of state sales<br />
> tax in states like california would be devastating to local schools,</p>
<p>Yet raising and adding <strong>taxes</strong> doesn&#8217;t devastate &#8220;Private business&#8221; and<br />
the private sector economy?  Interesting how YOU BELIEVE that <strong>taxes</strong> are<br />
a one way street.  Taxes are <strong>GOOD</strong> for everyone?</p>
<p>> and public services.  Your type of economics favors the very wealthy,<br />
> and hurts our country.</p>
<p>MY <strong>PLANS</strong> help the Nation while making everyone responsible and partners<br />
and dependent on success of the Nation(They live in <strong>Capitalist</strong> America).</p>
<p>Your plan <strong>DIVIDES</strong> THE <strong>NATION</strong> and makes half the Nation have zero<br />
interest in the economy and the success of the National economy because<br />
they get government money regardless of economic health(They live in<br />
Socialist America).</p>
<p>John Edwards was correct, there are <strong>TWO</strong> <strong>AMERICAS</strong>, he was wrong on what<br />
they are.  One is <strong>Capitalist</strong> America where we participate in the<br />
economy, the other America is Socialist America where they Live off the<br />
Government.</p>
</thendestroyeveryth>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/09/making-everyone-responsible-and-partners-and-dependent-on-success-of-the-nationthey-live-in-capitalist-america-the-rest-getting-free-government-moneythey-live-in-socialist-america-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Corporations and everyone paying as much tax as Warren Buffett&#8217;s Secretary.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/08/corporations-and-everyone-paying-as-much-tax-as-warren-buffetts-secretary-11/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/08/corporations-and-everyone-paying-as-much-tax-as-warren-buffetts-secretary-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 19:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HOUSEHOLD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Holmes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirby Lumber Co]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RARE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Buffett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WOW]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=25742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 12/8/2011 1:50 PM, cpt banjo wrote: > On Dec 8, 12:22 pm, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: > >> Do I get to write off my food and gas and the cost of getting my car >> fixed and clothes and education as a business expense because I have to >> eat and I have to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 12/8/2011 1:50 PM, cpt banjo wrote:<br />
> On Dec 8, 12:22 pm, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> Do I get to write off my food and gas and the cost of getting my car<br />
>> fixed and clothes and education as a business expense because I have to<br />
>> eat and I have to drive to get to the place where I do my business&#8230;..<br />
>>   do I get to write off all the work I do at home as an expense to me?<br />
>>  Sweat equity is an expense and a write-off.<br />
><br />
> You would have most of these expenses whether you worked or not.<br />
><br />
>> Why do I NOT get all the same write-offs when in fact running a<br />
>> household is the same as running a business, my household had gross<br />
>> income and expenses.  If it fails then I have to file bankruptcy.<br />
><br />
> Running a household is not the same as running a business.<br />
><br />
> Here&#8217;s how one court answered your objections:<br />
><br />
> &#8220;[Taxpayers'] principal argument is that <strong>Congress</strong>, by denying<br />
> deductions for personal, living, and family expenses in the<br />
> computation of taxable income, has exceeded its authority under the<br />
> Sixteenth Amendment to the <strong>Constitution</strong> to lay and collect <strong>taxes</strong> on<br />
> &#8220;incomes.&#8221; The cornerstone of petitioners&#8217; argument is the definition<br />
> of income stated by the <strong>Supreme Court</strong> in Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U.S.<br />
> 189, 207 (1920), as &#8220;the gain derived from capital, from labor, or<br />
> from both combined.&#8221; They argue that the &#8220;gain&#8221; from labor cannot be<br />
> determined until the &#8220;cost of doing labor,&#8221; i.e., their expenditures<br />
> at issue, has been subtracted from the amount received from the sale<br />
> of labor. Petitioners attempt to support their method of arriving at<br />
> the figure reflecting &#8220;income&#8221; which may constitutionally be taxed by<br />
> analogizing the &#8220;living expenses&#8221; of one who depends upon the sale of<br />
> his services for his livelihood to the &#8220;cost of goods sold&#8221; concept in<br />
> certain business contexts. [citations omitted] Appeal is made to<br />
> history and philosophy and to analysis of legal, <strong>social</strong>, and economic<br />
> concepts, none of which leads, however, to the result they seek.<br />
><br />
> It is difficult, if not impossible, to respond to arguments such as<br />
> petitioners have put forth without becoming embroiled in a game of<br />
> semantics. The logical force requiring rejection of their arguments &#8211;<br />
> apart from their assertions of personal political philosophy which do<br />
> not provide a basis for us, a Court sitting to interpret the law, to<br />
> decide the questions dispositive of this case &#8212; is essentially a<br />
> matter of the definition of terms. Thus, should we hold that &#8220;gain&#8221; is<br />
> an essential element of income, [citations omitted] we would still<br />
> face the problem of defining what constitutes &#8220;gain.&#8221;&#8230;It is in<br />
> situations like this that one can truly admire the wisdom of Mr.<br />
> <strong>Justice Holmes</strong>, in particular, as he expressed in <strong>United States</strong> v.<br />
> <strong>Kirby Lumber Co</strong>., 284 U.S. 1 (1931), &#8220;We see nothing to be gained by<br />
> the discussion of judicial definitions.&#8221;<br />
><br />
> Nevertheless, accepting the conclusion that some kind of &#8220;gain&#8221; must<br />
> be realized for there to be income, the flaw in petitioners&#8217; analogy<br />
> of what they call the &#8220;cost of doing labor&#8221; to the &#8220;cost of goods<br />
> sold&#8221; concept &#8212; essentially its failure to acknowledge the difference<br />
> between people and property &#8212; may be shown. The &#8220;cost of goods sold&#8221;<br />
> concept embraces expenditures necessary to acquire, construct or<br />
> extract a physical product which is to be sold; the seller can have no<br />
> gain until he recovers the economic investment that he has made<br />
> directly in the actual item sold.</p>
<p>Here is where the argument loses its hold on reality&#8230;.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t recover my economic investment until I get a pay check.</p>
<p>> [citations omitted] Labor, on the<br />
> other <strong>hand</strong>, is, in the current context, behavior performed by human<br />
> beings in exchange for compensation. One&#8217;s living expenses simply<br />
> cannot be his &#8220;cost&#8221; directly in the very item sold, i.e., his labor,<br />
> no matter how much <strong>money</strong> he spends to satisfy his human needs and<br />
> those of his family. Of course we recognize the necessity for<br />
> expenditures for such items as food, shelter, clothing, and proper<br />
> health maintenance.</p>
<p>And I have to work to get that <strong>money</strong> the same as a business sells their<br />
labor to pay their rent and electric and pay their water bill.</p>
<p>> They provide both the mental and physical<br />
> nourishment essential to maintain the body at a level of effectiveness<br />
> that will permit its labor to be productive. We do not even deny that<br />
> a certain similarity exists between the &#8220;cost of doing labor&#8221; and the<br />
> &#8220;cost of goods sold&#8221; concept. But the sale of one&#8217;s labor is not the<br />
> same creature as the sale of property, and whether the distinction<br />
> comports with petitioners&#8217; philosophical rationalization for their<br />
> argument, it is recognized for <strong>Federal</strong> income tax purposes. [citations<br />
> omitted] One&#8217;s gain, ergo his &#8220;income,&#8221; from the sale of his labor is<br />
> the entire amount received therefor without any reduction for what he<br />
> spends to satisfy his human needs.<br />
><br />
> Without constitutional backing for their position concerning the<br />
> definition of income, petitioners are left with a bald assertion that<br />
> section 262 is unconstitutional. However, it has long been established<br />
> that &#8220;<strong>Congress</strong> has power to condition, limit, or deny deductions from<br />
> gross income in order to arrive at the net that it chooses to<br />
> tax.&#8221; [citation omitted] And, as the <strong>Supreme Court</strong> has also stated:</p>
<p>So all that need be done is to get <strong>Congress</strong> to say that MY <strong>HOUSEHOLD</strong> is<br />
the same as your business, and that is all that&#8217;s needed to drop your<br />
corporate <strong>taxes</strong> to 15% from 35%&#8230;..</p>
<p>><br />
> &#8216;For income tax purposes <strong>Congress</strong> has seen fit to regard an individual<br />
> as having two personalities: &#8220;one is [as] a seeker after profit who<br />
> can deduct the expenses incurred in that search;</p>
<p>Looking for work?</p>
<p>> the other is [as] a<br />
> creature satisfying his needs as a human and those of his family but<br />
> who cannot deduct such consumption and related expenditures.&#8217;</p>
<p>Someone NOT looking for work?</p>
<p>> United<br />
> States v. Gilmore, 372 U.S. 39, 44 (1963). *This Court has no power* to<br />
> *enlarge* the deductions for personal exemptions *authorized* by section<br />
> 151 to comport with petitioners&#8217; actual living expenses.&#8221;<br />
> Reading v. Commissioner, 70 T.C. 730 (1978)&#8221;<br />
></p>
<p>The <strong>Supreme Court</strong> says they can *NOT* &#8220;create&#8221; &#8220;interpret&#8221; &#8220;expand&#8221; laws<br />
or powers? <strong>WOW</strong> that is <strong>RARE</strong> since they create government powers, and<br />
make new laws and expand old ones all the time.</p>
<p>If they have NO <strong>POWER</strong> to simply <strong>change</strong> this law, how do they have power<br />
to <strong>change</strong> other laws?   This law is No more special than any other law<br />
that they have already changed.  Yet they suggest that There is <strong>POWER</strong> to<br />
<strong>change</strong> laws.  Where is this power to <strong>change</strong> laws defined in the<br />
constitution?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll keep this quote above where they say they have no power re-write<br />
this law.  What is funny is they have no <strong>POWER</strong> to re-write any of the<br />
laws&#8230;..     a law must be voted on by congress and signed by the<br />
President.  So re-writing a law is unconstitutional unless it is done by<br />
congress and signed by the Executive.</p>
</thendestroyeveryth>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/08/corporations-and-everyone-paying-as-much-tax-as-warren-buffetts-secretary-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blagojevich sentenced to 14 years in prison &#8211; Poor guy, all he wanted was some social justice&#8230;the Progressive Way</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/08/blagojevich-sentenced-to-14-years-in-prison-poor-guy-all-he-wanted-was-some-social-justice-the-progressive-way/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/08/blagojevich-sentenced-to-14-years-in-prison-poor-guy-all-he-wanted-was-some-social-justice-the-progressive-way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 16:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LIBERALS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarian Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Thu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UTC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=25722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 12/8/2011 10:38 AM, 6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09 wrote: > On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 10:30:53 -0500, CB @&#038;*$?%PrayForMe.com wrote: > >> On Thu, 8 Dec 2011 03:47:14 +0000 (UTC), &#8220;6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09&#8243; >> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 22:32:47 -0500, CB @&#038;*$?%PrayForMe.com wrote: >>> >>>> Blagojevich sentenced to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 12/8/2011 <strong>10</strong>:38 AM, 6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09 wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Thu</strong>, 08 Dec 2011 <strong>10</strong>:30:53 -0500, <a href="mailto:CB<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>PrayForMe.com">CB<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>PrayForMe.com</a> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> <strong>On Thu</strong>, 8 Dec 2011 03:47:14 +0000 (<strong>UTC</strong>), &#8220;6338 Dead, 1481 since 1/20/09&#8243;<br />
>> <dead @gone.com> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>> On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 22:32:47 -0500, <a href="mailto:CB<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>PrayForMe.com">CB<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>PrayForMe.com</a> wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>> Blagojevich sentenced to 14 years in prison<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> <a href="http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/12/07/9275402-blagojevich-" >http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/12/07/9275402-blagojevich-</a><br />
>>> sentenced-to-14-years-in-prison?ocid=ansmsnbc11<br />
>>>></p>
<p>Now we need to move Eric <strong>Holder</strong> into the cell next to Blagovitch.</p>
<p></dead></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/08/blagojevich-sentenced-to-14-years-in-prison-poor-guy-all-he-wanted-was-some-social-justice-the-progressive-way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney Moves to Keep Gingrich Surge in Check</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/05/romney-moves-to-keep-gingrich-surge-in-check/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/05/romney-moves-to-keep-gingrich-surge-in-check/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 19:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BLOODED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EXIST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida Cuban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Des Moines Register]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mickey Mouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PARTY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REPUBLICANS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=25600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 12/5/2011 2:29 PM, MattB wrote: > On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 17:46:46 -0500, Larry Hewitt > wrote: > >> On 12/4/2011 3:57 PM, MattB wrote: >>> On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 15:04:58 -0500, Larry Hewitt >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 12/4/2011 1:49 PM, MattB wrote: >>>>> Romney Moves to Keep Gingrich Surge in Check [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 12/5/2011 2:29 PM, MattB wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Sun</strong>, 04 Dec 2011 17:46:46 -0500, Larry Hewitt<br />
> <larryhwtt @comporium.net> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> On 12/4/2011 3:57 PM, MattB wrote:<br />
>>> <strong>On Sun</strong>, 04 Dec 2011 15:04:58 -0500, Larry Hewitt<br />
>>> </larryhwtt><larryhwtt @comporium.net>  wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>> On 12/4/2011 1:49 PM, MattB wrote:<br />
>>>>> Romney Moves to Keep Gingrich Surge in Check<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/12/03/romney-moves-to-keep-gingrich-surge-in-check/" >http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/12/03/romney-moves-to-keep-gingrich-surge-in-check/</a><br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> <strong>Mitt Romney</strong> is moving quickly to re-assert his dominance in the<br />
>>>>> Republican presidential race, as <strong>Herman Cain</strong> drops out of the running<br />
>>>>> only to be replaced at the top of the polls by former House Speaker<br />
>>>>> <strong>Newt Gingrich</strong>.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> Cain&#8217;s exit Saturday following allegations of sexual misbehavior<br />
>>>>> narrows the field just a little. But Cain stopped posing a threat to<br />
>>>>> Romney what seemed like political eons ago &#8212; the former Massachusetts<br />
>>>>> governor now faces what could be his toughest challenge yet from<br />
>>>>> Gingrich. As Cain&#8217;s supporters shop around for a new horse to back,<br />
>>>>> Romney is in a fight to keep Gingrich from consolidating the<br />
>>>>> not-Romney vote.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> ********************<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Gingrich is not at all liked by the republican leadership. His surge is<br />
>>>> in Iowa because of the &#8220;anyone but Romney&#8221; movement by <strong>social</strong><br />
>>>> conservatives, but it is not carrying over to other states.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Romney continues to pick up the important endorsements including repug<br />
>>>> senators like Murkowski (r, <strong>AK</strong>), the largest paper in Iowa, the Florida<br />
>>>> Cuban community, and more, while Gingrich is picking up endorsements<br />
>>> >from fringe conservative groups that do not know his history.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Gingrich may win Iowa. Romney is probably going to take <strong>New Hampshire</strong><br />
>>>> and Florida. South Carolina is still a toss up. Repug voters here really<br />
>>>> do not like either, and so far this weekend Cain supporters have been<br />
>>>> moving to Bachmann.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Larry<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>>     I too would rather have a alternative to them.  Of what we have<br />
>>> like Romney the best not perfect, but what politician is.<br />
>>><br />
>>>   A person here says she can&#8217;t trust him to keep his oath.  Said he has<br />
>>> already broke a Oath to God it would be easy to break another.<br />
>>><br />
>>>   Bachmann please no&#8230;.<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>><br />
>> I think the race is just about over, and Obama wins. The repug field is<br />
>> self destructing.<br />
>><br />
>> More *new* candidates have joined the race since this summer than<br />
>> dropped out, and to stay relevant they are tearing the front runners<br />
>> down. Obama&#8217;s work is being done for him.<br />
>><br />
>> This weekend we have had Paul feud with  Trump, Bachmann with everyone,<br />
>> Santorum with Gingrich, Perry with Romney, the Va attorney general kick<br />
>> off his senate racd by attacking Romney, conservative family groups<br />
>> slammed Santorum for campaigning while his daughter is dying, &#8230;<br />
>><br />
>> Anyway, Iowa is hardly going to give anyone momentum. Gingrich is<br />
>> polling just 25% as leader, and undecided is 4th at 11%!!<br />
>><br />
>> The real bad news fr the whole field is that as of Friday&#8217;s Des Moines<br />
>> Register poll 60% of likely voters have not made up their minds, so big,<br />
>> fast shifts may still happen.<br />
>><br />
>> Larry<br />
><br />
><br />
>   No the Republican party is just a little ill.  We have a cancer and<br />
> it is called the Tea Party Patriots.  We have slowly been removing it<br />
> candidate by candidate.  We have one left a big tumor call Newt<br />
> Gingrich.  The <strong>Newt Cancer</strong> likes Children as workers.  The <strong>Newt Cancer</strong><br />
> broke a oath to God.  Yet soon we will remove the Newt cancer and heal<br />
> the Republican Party.   It will be Tea party free in 2012 just needs a<br />
> treatment of truth aimed at the Tea party Patriots..<br />
><br />
>  So if we can cure ourselves of the Tea Party Cancer we can still beat<br />
> Obama.  The Republican Party can still win.</p>
<p>Why go back to what put Obama in control&#8230;.  The <strong>TEA</strong> <strong>PARTY</strong> didn&#8217;t <strong>EXIST</strong><br />
before George Bush and all the &#8220;BLUE <strong>BLOODED</strong>&#8221; Republicans took us into<br />
this Obama world Order.</p>
<p>>  I personally won&#8217;t vote or support Gingrich.  He is a total <strong><acronym title="ASS"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> A&*$?%S</span></acronym></strong>.</p>
<p>That is true but he is less of an <acronym title="ass"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> a&*$?%s</span></acronym> than Obama.</p>
<p>Get a real Candidate and don&#8217;t let the TV <strong>NEWS</strong> trolls tell us who it<br />
will be.</p>
<p>> Maybe all Republicans that reject the Tea Party should write in Mickey<br />
> Mouse and a form of protest to them.</p>
<p>If you want more of what you have had then do that.</p>
<p>Because the <strong>TEA</strong> <strong>PARTY</strong> hasn&#8217;t been involved in allowing what led to<br />
Obama&#8217;s Socialism.</p>
<p>In Fact <strong>Sarah Palin</strong> was the *ONLY* bright spot in McCain&#8217;s campaign.</p>
<p>2010 was a winner for <strong>REPUBLICANS</strong>, *ONLY* because of the <strong>TEA</strong> <strong>PARTY</strong>.</p>
<p>I am <strong>TEA</strong> <strong>PARTY</strong> and I will again get rid of more of your idiot good`ol<br />
boys that are scamming us and helping the fellow <strong>Washington Government</strong><br />
insiders.</p>
<p></larryhwtt></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/05/romney-moves-to-keep-gingrich-surge-in-check/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More correlations for the Greenists</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/05/more-correlations-for-the-greenists/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/05/more-correlations-for-the-greenists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 18:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Giga2 Giga2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magnetic Electrical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orval Fairbairn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=25598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 12/5/2011 1:33 PM, Orval Fairbairn wrote: > In article > , > &#8220;erschroedinger @&#038;*$?%gmail.com&#8221; wrote: > >> On Dec 4, 12:52 pm, Wally W. wrote: >>> On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 05:40:18 -0800 (PST), Dawlish wrote: >>>> On Dec 4, 10:41 am, &#8220;Giga2&#8243; < "Giga2" >>> end)ho&#8230;@yahoo.co> wrote: >>>>> &#8220;Dawlish&#8221; wrote in message >>> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 12/5/2011 1:33 PM, <strong>Orval Fairbairn</strong> wrote:<br />
> In article<br />
> <e5ce0e77 -f26e-453a-9e0d-4fb0f88d8e70<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>g21g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>,<br />
>  &#8220;erschroedinger<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>gmail.com&#8221; <erschroedinger @gmail.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> On Dec 4, 12:52 pm, Wally W. <ww8 ...@aim.com> wrote:<br />
>>> <strong>On Sun</strong>, 4 Dec 2011 05:40:18 -0800 (<strong>PST</strong>), Dawlish wrote:<br />
>>>> On Dec 4, <strong>10</strong>:41 am, &#8220;Giga2&#8243; < "Giga2" <just(removetheseandaddmatthe<br />
>>>> end)ho&#8230;@yahoo.co> wrote:<br />
>>>>> &#8220;Dawlish&#8221;
<pjg ...@hotmail.com> wrote in message<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> news:5c5c2a37-6e57-469c-a122-578ef4827a1f<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>w1g2000vba.googlegroups.com&#8230;<br />
>>>>> On Dec 3, 9:25 pm, Wally W. <ww8 ...@aim.com> wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> Correlations are &#8220;science&#8221; in the <strong>AGW</strong> hype.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> Here you go, Greenists: A new correlation for every day of the week:<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> <a href="http://www.correlated.org/" >http://www.correlated.org/</a><br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> Hurry! It could be *you* who finds the next trend to hype.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> <strong>WTF</strong> is a greenist?<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> Try these two correlations 0.87 and 0.91. <strong>CO2</strong> and temperature 1880-<br />
>>>>> present. Both at the 99%+ significance level.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> =<strong>BS</strong><br />
>>><br />
>>>>> Now explain them.<br />
>>><br />
>>>> Two of us already have. Now do the calculations yourself, if you can<br />
>>>> and see if you find bullshit&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..or if you find exactly<br />
>>>> what <strong>AGW</strong> and I found &#8211; very strong correlations which show very high<br />
>>>> statistical significance.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Very strong correlations show very high statistical significance<br />
>>> *only* if the relationship is meaningful.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Statistical significance is not the same as scientific significance.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Large correlation in a minor factor may not be significant in an<br />
>>> overall effect.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Scientific significance is not the same as political significance.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Scientific significance is not the same as economical significance.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Scientific significance is not the same as <strong>social</strong> significance.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Few people outside the cult don&#8217;t give a rat&#8217;s <acronym title="ass"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> a&*$?%s</span></acronym> about religious<br />
>>> dogma based on cooked numbers and hysterics.<br />
>>><br />
>>> What was your point?<br />
>>><br />
>>> No support from Greenists in this thread. Have they stopped listening<br />
>>> to you?<br />
>><br />
>> Correlation is necessary (but not sufficient) for causation.<br />
>><br />
>> <strong>Global</strong> temperatures are correlated with <strong>CO2</strong> levels.  They are not<br />
>> correlated with anything else that could conceivably be a cause.<br />
><br />
> &#8230; like the clearing of forests, urban development? The <strong>AGW</strong> crowd likes<br />
> to deny those influences and wants to blame the minuscule amount of <strong>CO2</strong><br />
> in the atmoaphere.</p>
<p><strong>NEW</strong> Pavement, lack of erupting volcanoes&#8230;.  lava vents at the ocean<br />
floor, lack of cloud cover, Magnetic/Electrical/<strong>RF</strong> interference with the<br />
ionosphere, Nuclear background radiation, micro black holes and/or<br />
white/dark matter or Gamma rays from a star explosion years ago. Space<br />
trash and gravitational orbits of the trash and comets and moons and the<br />
the planets and sun and Galaxy stressing the earth.  Humans own bio mass<br />
and heat.  Inter dimensional Energy leaking from a time or place we are<br />
simultaneously standing in.</p>
<p>Loss of atmosphere into space&#8230;.</p>
<p></ww8></pjg></ww8></erschroedinger></e5ce0e77></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/05/more-correlations-for-the-greenists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>if social security/medicare is good enough for ayn rand and frederick hayek:its good enough for the rest of us:):hayek feared he could not afford private medical insurance:so the KOCH brothers used a prominent libertarian economist to research</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/03/if-social-securitymedicare-is-good-enough-for-ayn-rand-and-frederick-hayekits-good-enough-for-the-rest-of-ushayek-feared-he-could-not-afford-private-medical-insuranceso-the-koch-brothers-used-a/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/03/if-social-securitymedicare-is-good-enough-for-ayn-rand-and-frederick-hayekits-good-enough-for-the-rest-of-ushayek-feared-he-could-not-afford-private-medical-insuranceso-the-koch-brothers-used-a/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 17:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KOCH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Les Cargill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Margret Sanger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neitsche Spencer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=25498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 12/3/2011 1:44 AM, Nickname unavailable wrote: > On Dec 2, 5:35 pm, L&#038;*$?%l wrote: >> Nickname unavailable wrote: >>> On Dec 2, 1:00 pm, &#8220; J&#038;*$?%a&#8221; wrote: >>>> Should be people take care of their own needs and wants, or should the >>>> depend on someone else to take care of their needs and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 12/3/2011 1:44 AM, Nickname unavailable wrote:<br />
> On Dec 2, 5:35 pm, <strong><acronym title="Les Cargill"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> L&*$?%l</span></acronym></strong> <lcargil ...@comcast.com> wrote:<br />
>> Nickname unavailable wrote:<br />
>>> On Dec 2, 1:00 pm, &#8220;<acronym title="Jerry Okamura"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> J&*$?%a</span></acronym>&#8221;<okamuraj ...@hawaii.rr.com>  wrote:<br />
>>>> Should be people take care of their own needs and wants, or should the<br />
>>>> depend on someone else to take care of their needs and wants?  Which<br />
>>>> preserves our freedoms the most?<br />
>><br />
>>>   <strong>social</strong> darwinism which was embraced by rand and hitler,<br />
>><br />
>> NO! They were both roughly Neitsche-followers. Neitsche !=  Spencer.<br />
>> *All* 19th century thinkers were plagued by a belief in positive<br />
>> determinism.<br />
>><br />
><br />
><br />
>  it matters not what monster they slavishly worshiped, what matters is<br />
> that their beliefs be unmasked for all to see. americans saw them for<br />
> what that type was in the 1930&#8242;s, and were repulsed.<br />
></p>
<p>Eugenics of that era was hardly Social Darwinism&#8230;..   it was a<br />
Socialist central plan for human evolution a way of spreading around the<br />
Genetic <strong>wealth</strong>, the <strong>Margret Sanger</strong> types and the Hitler types thought<br />
they knew more than evolution knew.  But <strong>AIDS</strong> and other evolutionary<br />
factors are proving they really had no clue.</p>
<p></okamuraj></lcargil></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/03/if-social-securitymedicare-is-good-enough-for-ayn-rand-and-frederick-hayekits-good-enough-for-the-rest-of-ushayek-feared-he-could-not-afford-private-medical-insuranceso-the-koch-brothers-used-a/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Children are made into sheep and easy targets for the gay sexual predators by the Schools that teach them that it&#8217;s HATE and it&#8217;s illegal to dislike and a HATE CRIME to defend themselves from the gay predators&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/22/children-are-made-into-sheep-and-easy-targets-for-the-gay-sexual-predators-by-the-schools-that-teach-them-that-its-hate-and-its-illegal-to-dislike-and-a-hate-crime-to-defend-themselves-from-the-gay-4/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/22/children-are-made-into-sheep-and-easy-targets-for-the-gay-sexual-predators-by-the-schools-that-teach-them-that-its-hate-and-its-illegal-to-dislike-and-a-hate-crime-to-defend-themselves-from-the-gay-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constantly Repeating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craig Chilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRIME]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOOMING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FACILITIES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FACTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GENDER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HATE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTELLIGENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRRATIONAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LAWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MILLIONS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RESOURCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIGHTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPECIFIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TENS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=25130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 11/22/2011 11:20 AM, hersheyh wrote: > On Nov 19, 5:20 pm, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: >> Children are made into sheep and easy targets for the gay sexual >> predators by the Schools that teach them that it&#8217;s HATE and it&#8217;s illegal >> to dislike and a HATE CRIME to defend themselves from the gay [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On <strong>11</strong>/22/2011 <strong>11</strong>:20 AM, hersheyh wrote:<br />
> On Nov 19, 5:20 pm, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>> Children are made into sheep and easy targets for the gay sexual<br />
>> predators by the Schools that teach them that it&#8217;s <strong>HATE</strong> and it&#8217;s illegal<br />
>> to dislike and a <strong>HATE</strong> <strong>CRIME</strong> to defend themselves from the gay predators&#8230;<br />
>><br />
>> This is the underlying problem with government schools, they teach the<br />
>> Democrat-Socialist agenda hidden as an under the desk education that is<br />
>> forced on all students.<br />
>><br />
>> On <strong>11</strong>/19/2011 8:20 AM, (¯`·.¸ <strong>Craig Chilton</strong> ¸.·´¯)<br />
>><br />
>> <a href="http://www.TravelForPay.org" >http://www.TravelForPay.org</a> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>      [[[[    <strong>RESOURCE</strong> POST:  *<strong>FACTS</strong>* Don't Change.<br />
>>>               And Constantly *Repeating* Them is <strong>DOOMING</strong><br />
>>>               the Bigots' <strong>IRRATIONAL</strong> Hate-Agendas!   ]]]]<br />
>><br />
>>>     Egalitarians are <strong>INTELLIGENT</strong> enough to know that once <strong>FACTS</strong><br />
>>> that are *devastating* to all bigots and their hate-agendas &#8211;<br />
>>> especially the ones that seek to *victimize* <strong>TENS</strong> of <strong>MILLIONS</strong> of<br />
>>> people by blocking them from (1) having across-the-board EQUAL<br />
>>> rights for all <strong>LGBT</strong> people, including Marriage Equality&#8230; for abso-<br />
>>> lutely NO good reason, and<br />
>><br />
>> We see one reason that jumped out at us this month, <acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym> that are after<br />
>> young boys in the public showers&#8230;..<br />
>><br />
>> If <acronym title="Gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> G&*$?%s</span></acronym> are different and need Gay Hate crime laws and need gay<br />
>> Marriage, then they also need *<strong>GENDER</strong> <strong>SPECIFIC</strong> <strong>FACILITIES</strong>* . and need to<br />
>> be kept out of locker rooms for heterosexuals.  The <acronym title="Gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> G&*$?%s</span></acronym> need a (G) for<br />
>> their sex on their drivers license.  Anyone known to have gay sex should<br />
>> be so designated permanently.    Then when caught in a boys facilities<br />
>> they can be chastised just as boys slipping into the girls bath room<br />
>> are,  and marked as sexual predators or stalkers.  As Men hanging out in<br />
>> the girls bathrooms are.<br />
>><br />
>> Then there&#8217;s military bunks boys camps&#8230;.. and other NOT so private<br />
>> areas where <acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym> can stalk and cruise for vulnerable situations with<br />
>> boys or men.    <acronym title="Gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> G&*$?%s</span></acronym> <strong>RIGHTS</strong> have been placed above the <strong>RIGHTS</strong> of hetero<br />
>> sexual men&#8230;.   <strong>HATE</strong> <strong>LAWS</strong> have replaced <strong>social</strong> taboos that once kept<br />
>> <acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym> from attacking/molesting young men are NOW making hetero sexual men<br />
>> targets for older gay sexual predators.   A fist was once used to<br />
>> warn-off <acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym> and it is NOW a <strong>HATE</strong> <strong>CRIME</strong>. Children are made into sheep<br />
>> and easy targets for the gay sexual predators by the Schools that teach<br />
>> them that it is illegal to dislike or defend themselves from the gay<br />
>> predators&#8230;<br />
>><br />
> [snip]<br />
><br />
> I guess it is O.K. to be a male child predator who targets little<br />
> girls in your mind.  At least I don&#8217;t see you being concerned about<br />
> them.  And most child-molesting by males is heterosexual.  You<br />
> probably think the little girls asked for it, unlike the little boys.<br />
> To me, child sex abuse is a disgusting crime regardless of whether it<br />
> is homosexual or heterosexual in nature.<br />
><br />
> <a href="http://www.ptsd.va.gov/public/pages/child-sexual-abuse.asp" >http://www.ptsd.va.gov/public/pages/child-sexual-abuse.asp</a></p>
<p>We don&#8217;t have special hate laws that tell little girls that they have to<br />
like a hetero sexual man or that it&#8217;s a special hate crime to kick, hit<br />
or otherwise make their dislike of that man known because it&#8217;s<br />
especially extra illegal and makes the child a bad person.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t tell little girls that hating or fearing a heterosexual man is<br />
bad and phobic and Bigoted.   We don&#8217;t fill their heads with that same<br />
kind of <strong>Liberal Propaganda</strong> that we expose young men to, when schools<br />
indoctrinate children about <acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym>.</p>
<p>You and government are creating the problem.</p>
</thendestroyeveryth>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/22/children-are-made-into-sheep-and-easy-targets-for-the-gay-sexual-predators-by-the-schools-that-teach-them-that-its-hate-and-its-illegal-to-dislike-and-a-hate-crime-to-defend-themselves-from-the-gay-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Children are made into sheep and easy targets for the gay sexual predators by the Schools that teach them that it&#8217;s HATE and it&#8217;s illegal to dislike and a HATE CRIME to defend themselves from the gay predators&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/21/children-are-made-into-sheep-and-easy-targets-for-the-gay-sexual-predators-by-the-schools-that-teach-them-that-its-hate-and-its-illegal-to-dislike-and-a-hate-crime-to-defend-themselves-from-the-gay-3/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/21/children-are-made-into-sheep-and-easy-targets-for-the-gay-sexual-predators-by-the-schools-that-teach-them-that-its-hate-and-its-illegal-to-dislike-and-a-hate-crime-to-defend-themselves-from-the-gay-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 23:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CITIZENS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRIME]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOOMING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FACILITIES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FACT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FORCING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GENDER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HATE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[include]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTELLIGENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PROBLEMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAPE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIGHTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TENS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WORTHLESS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=25110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 11/21/2011 4:32 PM, erschroedinger @&#038;*$?%gmail.com wrote: > On Nov 21, 3:09 pm, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: >> On 11/21/2011 10:46 AM, erschroedin&#8230;@gmail.com wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Nov 19, 5:20 pm, BeamMeUpScotty >>> wrote: >>>> Children are made into sheep and easy targets for the gay sexual >>>> predators by the Schools that teach [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On <strong>11</strong>/21/2011 4:32 PM, <a href="mailto:erschroedinger<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>gmail.com">erschroedinger<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>gmail.com</a> wrote:<br />
> On Nov 21, 3:09 pm, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>> On <strong>11</strong>/21/2011 <strong>10</strong>:46 AM, <a href="mailto:erschroedin...@gmail.com">erschroedin&#8230;@gmail.com</a> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>> On Nov 19, 5:20 pm, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>>> </thendestroyeveryth>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>>>> Children are made into sheep and easy targets for the gay sexual<br />
>>>> predators by the Schools that teach them that it&#8217;s <strong>HATE</strong> and it&#8217;s illegal<br />
>>>> to dislike and a <strong>HATE</strong> <strong>CRIME</strong> to defend themselves from the gay predators&#8230;<br />
>><br />
>>>> This is the underlying problem with government schools, they teach the<br />
>>>> Democrat-Socialist agenda hidden as an under the desk education that is<br />
>>>> forced on all students.<br />
>><br />
>>>> On <strong>11</strong>/19/2011 8:20 AM, (¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯)<br />
>><br />
>>>> <a href="http://www.TravelForPay.org" >http://www.TravelForPay.org</a> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>>      [[[[    RESOURCE POST:  *FACTS* Don't Change.<br />
>>>>>               And Constantly *Repeating* Them is <strong>DOOMING</strong><br />
>>>>>               the Bigots' IRRATIONAL Hate-Agendas!   ]]]]<br />
>><br />
>>>>>     Egalitarians are <strong>INTELLIGENT</strong> enough to know that once FACTS<br />
>>>>> that are *devastating* to all bigots and their hate-agendas &#8211;<br />
>>>>> especially the ones that seek to *victimize* <strong>TENS</strong> of MILLIONS of<br />
>>>>> people by blocking them from (1) having across-the-board EQUAL<br />
>>>>> rights for all LGBT people, including Marriage Equality&#8230; for abso-<br />
>>>>> lutely NO good reason, and<br />
>><br />
>>>> We see one reason that jumped out at us this month, <acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym> that are after<br />
>>>> young boys in the public showers&#8230;..<br />
>><br />
>>>> If <acronym title="Gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> G&*$?%s</span></acronym> are different and need Gay Hate crime laws and need gay<br />
>>>> Marriage, then they also need *<strong>GENDER</strong> SPECIFIC <strong>FACILITIES</strong>* . and need to<br />
>>>> be kept out of locker rooms for heterosexuals.  The <acronym title="Gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> G&*$?%s</span></acronym> need a (G) for<br />
>>>> their sex on their drivers license.  Anyone known to have gay sex should<br />
>>>> be so designated permanently.    Then when caught in a boys facilities<br />
>>>> they can be chastised just as boys slipping into the girls bath room<br />
>>>> are,  and marked as sexual predators or stalkers.  As Men hanging out in<br />
>>>> the girls bathrooms are.<br />
>><br />
>>>> Then there&#8217;s military bunks boys camps&#8230;.. and other NOT so private<br />
>>>> areas where <acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym> can stalk and cruise for vulnerable situations with<br />
>>>> boys or men.    <acronym title="Gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> G&*$?%s</span></acronym> <strong>RIGHTS</strong> have been placed above the <strong>RIGHTS</strong> of hetero<br />
>>>> sexual men&#8230;.   <strong>HATE</strong> LAWS have replaced <strong>social</strong> taboos that once kept<br />
>>>> <acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym> from attacking/molesting young men are NOW making hetero sexual men<br />
>>>> targets for older gay sexual predators.   A fist was once used to<br />
>>>> warn-off <acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym> and it is NOW a <strong>HATE</strong> <strong>CRIME</strong>. Children are made into sheep<br />
>>>> and easy targets for the gay sexual predators by the Schools that teach<br />
>>>> them that it is illegal to dislike or defend themselves from the gay<br />
>>>> predators&#8230;<br />
>><br />
>>>> It is the *government that has created the <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>PROBLEMS</strong>* through <strong>social</strong><br />
>>>> engineering.<br />
>><br />
>>>>> (2) IRRATIONALLY seeking to hurl the<br />
>>>>> USAback into the pre-1973 Dark Ages of <strong>FORCING</strong> girls and wom-<br />
>>>>> en to gestate <strong>WORTHLESS</strong>-when-UNwanted pregnancies to term<br />
>>>>> against their will (a very real and unconscionable 9-month-long<br />
>>>>> form of <strong>RAPE</strong>)&#8230;have been marshalled and presented WELL &#8211;<br />
>>>>> the BEST way to put those resources to use is to RE-PRESENT<br />
>>>>> them *every* time that it is appropriate to do so.<br />
>><br />
>>>> The dark ages when they killed babies? Yes that is true, we are in the<br />
>>>> darkest of the baby killing ages where millions are killed despite the<br />
>>>> <strong>FACT</strong> that we have drugs and condoms and sterilization and more that can<br />
>>>> prevent the fertilization and creation of a person.<br />
>><br />
>>>> If you can call a corporation a person, isn&#8217;t it obvious that a human<br />
>>>> baby in or out of a uterus is a person.  First of all there is no<br />
>>>> specific mention that a person can NOT reside in a uterus. Secondly the<br />
>>>> GPS coordinates of a person inside the united States territory can be in<br />
>>>> a uterus. There is no distinction for person-hood.  A person is a live<br />
>>>> human inside of the united states.<br />
>><br />
>>>> A &#8220;citizen&#8221; is a person born inside the united states.<br />
>><br />
>>>> <strong>NOTE</strong> the distinction that a citizen is &#8220;born&#8221; inside the united States<br />
>>>> or naturalized after their birth, but they are still a person if they<br />
>>>> are in the united states and are NOT a citizen.<br />
>><br />
>>>> It isn&#8217;t a question of what &#8220;you&#8221; want, it&#8217;s a question of another<br />
>>>> persons <strong>RIGHTS</strong>&#8230;..   You get tired of your kids you can *NOT* just kill<br />
>>>> them under our constitution because they are persons with <strong>RIGHTS</strong>.   As<br />
>>>> is a person in the uterus.<br />
>><br />
>>>> The <strong>FACT</strong> you have committed a million murders a year is no reason to<br />
>>>> keep murdering a million children a year.<br />
>><br />
>>>> Vegans that can&#8217;t eat meat because they love all the little animals are<br />
>>>> a measure of your hypocrisy as they are mostly Democrat-Socialists that<br />
>>>> are willing to kill a human life but then make such a stink over their<br />
>>>> NOT killing animals to eat.<br />
>><br />
>>>> The ignorance of the LEFT-WING LOONS is colossal.<br />
>><br />
>>> Most child sexual abuse occurs from heterosexual adults.<br />
>><br />
>> Most hand gun murders are black on black&#8230;..  so why do we need hate<br />
>> crime laws? You Liberals aren&#8217;t very consistent with your support of<br />
>> laws.  Sort of hypocritical aren&#8217;t you?<br />
>><br />
>> Is that what you are saying when you say, &#8220;most sex crimes are by<br />
>> heterosexuals&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>> 98% of people are heterosexual.<br />
>> 17% are black<br />
>> 2% are gay<br />
>><br />
>> ALL ARE <strong>CITIZENS</strong> and all need to be equal under the law.<br />
>><br />
>> The problem with your scenario is that we need equal protection under<br />
>> the law and <acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym> are less than 2% of the population but still need to<br />
>> have laws that <strong>include</strong> them as a special hate law does.<br />
><br />
> Sure, like Jews &#8212; painting a swastika on a synagogue is different<br />
> from painting a heart on a bridge overpass.</p>
<p>What is the difference, both may be symbols of groups that hate me?</p>
<p>Except that I have an (M) on my drivers license&#8230;. why is a (G) on a<br />
<acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym> license like a star on a Jew?  I fail to see the problem or<br />
similarity, aren&#8217;t they proud of being GAY?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s you that says they are different and need hate laws and marriage<br />
laws special for them. I am suggesting they also should have their own<br />
designation on their drivers license.</p>
<p>> And special laws &#8212; what about the special laws that don&#8217;t let <acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym><br />
> wed, inherit, visit partners in the hospital, etc?</p>
<p>NO such thing, marriage is/was NOT designed for <acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym> and can&#8217;t be<br />
changed to work for both <acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym> and heterosexuals&#8230;..   Marriage has<br />
meanings to heterosexuals that created it that <acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym> simply can&#8217;t<br />
appreciate or fulfill.</p>
<p>Calling two <acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym> married is a joke, and neither the person calling them<br />
married nor the <acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym> that are able to understand what marriage is about<br />
or they would NOT make the error of calling it gay marriage.</p>
<p>Gay Marriage is an oxymoron.   Since the only way it works is if a Gay<br />
man and a <acronym title="Lesbian"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> L&*$?%n</span></acronym> woman get married and that is between them and their<br />
own conscience as to whether they are entering into it for the right<br />
reasons.</p>
<p>If they want to visit in the hospital they can make the proper legal<br />
preparations to solve that *legal* problem.</p>
<p>>> They need<br />
>> special Gender designations. That SPECIAL gender designation would be<br />
>> different than MALE or FEMALE, they would also be separated from the<br />
>> other GENDERS as the M/F are from each other already.  Or at least you<br />
>> say so when you say they need special hate crime laws and marriage laws.<br />
>><br />
>> They are different and need special treatment like a <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>GENDER</strong> WOULD NEED.<br />
>><br />
>> &#8211;<br />
><br />
> And there&#8217;s the special circle of hell for bigots.  Hope you&#8217;ll like<br />
> it there.</p>
<p>Go and be as gay as you want, I don&#8217;t need to hear about it.<br />
You deserve no more <strong>RIGHTS</strong> than I do.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have a God or a heaven or Hell.<br />
I deal in FACTS.</p>
</thendestroyeveryth>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/21/children-are-made-into-sheep-and-easy-targets-for-the-gay-sexual-predators-by-the-schools-that-teach-them-that-its-hate-and-its-illegal-to-dislike-and-a-hate-crime-to-defend-themselves-from-the-gay-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Children are made into sheep and easy targets for the gay sexual predators by the Schools that teach them that it&#8217;s HATE and it&#8217;s illegal to dislike and a HATE CRIME to defend themselves from the gay predators&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/21/children-are-made-into-sheep-and-easy-targets-for-the-gay-sexual-predators-by-the-schools-that-teach-them-that-its-hate-and-its-illegal-to-dislike-and-a-hate-crime-to-defend-themselves-from-the-gay-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/21/children-are-made-into-sheep-and-easy-targets-for-the-gay-sexual-predators-by-the-schools-that-teach-them-that-its-hate-and-its-illegal-to-dislike-and-a-hate-crime-to-defend-themselves-from-the-gay-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 20:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CITIZENS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constantly Repeating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRIME]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOOMING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FACILITIES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FACT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FORCING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GENDER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HATE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTELLIGENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PROBLEMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAPE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIGHTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TENS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WORTHLESS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=25092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 11/21/2011 10:46 AM, erschroedinger @&#038;*$?%gmail.com wrote: > On Nov 19, 5:20 pm, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: >> Children are made into sheep and easy targets for the gay sexual >> predators by the Schools that teach them that it&#8217;s HATE and it&#8217;s illegal >> to dislike and a HATE CRIME to defend themselves from the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On <strong>11</strong>/21/2011 <strong>10</strong>:46 AM, <a href="mailto:erschroedinger<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>gmail.com">erschroedinger<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>gmail.com</a> wrote:<br />
> On Nov 19, 5:20 pm, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>> Children are made into sheep and easy targets for the gay sexual<br />
>> predators by the Schools that teach them that it&#8217;s <strong>HATE</strong> and it&#8217;s illegal<br />
>> to dislike and a <strong>HATE</strong> <strong>CRIME</strong> to defend themselves from the gay predators&#8230;<br />
>><br />
>> This is the underlying problem with government schools, they teach the<br />
>> Democrat-Socialist agenda hidden as an under the desk education that is<br />
>> forced on all students.<br />
>><br />
>> On <strong>11</strong>/19/2011 8:20 AM, (¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯)<br />
>><br />
>> <a href="http://www.TravelForPay.org" >http://www.TravelForPay.org</a> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>      [[[[    RESOURCE POST:  *FACTS* Don't Change.<br />
>>>               And Constantly *Repeating* Them is <strong>DOOMING</strong><br />
>>>               the Bigots' IRRATIONAL Hate-Agendas!   ]]]]<br />
>><br />
>>>     Egalitarians are <strong>INTELLIGENT</strong> enough to know that once FACTS<br />
>>> that are *devastating* to all bigots and their hate-agendas &#8211;<br />
>>> especially the ones that seek to *victimize* <strong>TENS</strong> of MILLIONS of<br />
>>> people by blocking them from (1) having across-the-board EQUAL<br />
>>> rights for all LGBT people, including Marriage Equality&#8230; for abso-<br />
>>> lutely NO good reason, and<br />
>><br />
>> We see one reason that jumped out at us this month, <acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym> that are after<br />
>> young boys in the public showers&#8230;..<br />
>><br />
>> If <acronym title="Gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> G&*$?%s</span></acronym> are different and need Gay Hate crime laws and need gay<br />
>> Marriage, then they also need *<strong>GENDER</strong> SPECIFIC <strong>FACILITIES</strong>* . and need to<br />
>> be kept out of locker rooms for heterosexuals.  The <acronym title="Gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> G&*$?%s</span></acronym> need a (G) for<br />
>> their sex on their drivers license.  Anyone known to have gay sex should<br />
>> be so designated permanently.    Then when caught in a boys facilities<br />
>> they can be chastised just as boys slipping into the girls bath room<br />
>> are,  and marked as sexual predators or stalkers.  As Men hanging out in<br />
>> the girls bathrooms are.<br />
>><br />
>> Then there&#8217;s military bunks boys camps&#8230;.. and other NOT so private<br />
>> areas where <acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym> can stalk and cruise for vulnerable situations with<br />
>> boys or men.    <acronym title="Gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> G&*$?%s</span></acronym> <strong>RIGHTS</strong> have been placed above the <strong>RIGHTS</strong> of hetero<br />
>> sexual men&#8230;.   <strong>HATE</strong> LAWS have replaced <strong>social</strong> taboos that once kept<br />
>> <acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym> from attacking/molesting young men are NOW making hetero sexual men<br />
>> targets for older gay sexual predators.   A fist was once used to<br />
>> warn-off <acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym> and it is NOW a <strong>HATE</strong> <strong>CRIME</strong>. Children are made into sheep<br />
>> and easy targets for the gay sexual predators by the Schools that teach<br />
>> them that it is illegal to dislike or defend themselves from the gay<br />
>> predators&#8230;<br />
>><br />
>> It is the *government that has created the <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>PROBLEMS</strong>* through <strong>social</strong><br />
>> engineering.<br />
>><br />
>>> (2) IRRATIONALLY seeking to hurl the<br />
>>> USAback into the pre-1973 Dark Ages of <strong>FORCING</strong> girls and wom-<br />
>>> en to gestate <strong>WORTHLESS</strong>-when-UNwanted pregnancies to term<br />
>>> against their will (a very real and unconscionable 9-month-long<br />
>>> form of <strong>RAPE</strong>)&#8230;have been marshalled and presented WELL &#8211;<br />
>>> the BEST way to put those resources to use is to RE-PRESENT<br />
>>> them *every* time that it is appropriate to do so.<br />
>><br />
>> The dark ages when they killed babies? Yes that is true, we are in the<br />
>> darkest of the baby killing ages where millions are killed despite the<br />
>> <strong>FACT</strong> that we have drugs and condoms and sterilization and more that can<br />
>> prevent the fertilization and creation of a person.<br />
>><br />
>> If you can call a corporation a person, isn&#8217;t it obvious that a human<br />
>> baby in or out of a uterus is a person.  First of all there is no<br />
>> specific mention that a person can NOT reside in a uterus. Secondly the<br />
>> GPS coordinates of a person inside the united States territory can be in<br />
>> a uterus. There is no distinction for person-hood.  A person is a live<br />
>> human inside of the united states.<br />
>><br />
>> A &#8220;citizen&#8221; is a person born inside the united states.<br />
>><br />
>> <strong>NOTE</strong> the distinction that a citizen is &#8220;born&#8221; inside the united States<br />
>> or naturalized after their birth, but they are still a person if they<br />
>> are in the united states and are NOT a citizen.<br />
>><br />
>> It isn&#8217;t a question of what &#8220;you&#8221; want, it&#8217;s a question of another<br />
>> persons <strong>RIGHTS</strong>&#8230;..   You get tired of your kids you can *NOT* just kill<br />
>> them under our constitution because they are persons with <strong>RIGHTS</strong>.   As<br />
>> is a person in the uterus.<br />
>><br />
>> The <strong>FACT</strong> you have committed a million murders a year is no reason to<br />
>> keep murdering a million children a year.<br />
>><br />
>> Vegans that can&#8217;t eat meat because they love all the little animals are<br />
>> a measure of your hypocrisy as they are mostly Democrat-Socialists that<br />
>> are willing to kill a human life but then make such a stink over their<br />
>> NOT killing animals to eat.<br />
>><br />
>> The ignorance of the LEFT-WING LOONS is colossal.<br />
><br />
> Most child sexual abuse occurs from heterosexual adults.</p>
<p>Most hand gun murders are black on black&#8230;..  so why do we need hate<br />
crime laws? You Liberals aren&#8217;t very consistent with your support of<br />
laws.  Sort of hypocritical aren&#8217;t you?</p>
<p>Is that what you are saying when you say, &#8220;most sex crimes are by<br />
heterosexuals&#8221;</p>
<p>98% of people are heterosexual.<br />
17% are black<br />
2% are gay</p>
<p>ALL ARE <strong>CITIZENS</strong> and all need to be equal under the law.</p>
<p>The problem with your scenario is that we need equal protection under<br />
the law and <acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym> are less than 2% of the population but still need to<br />
have laws that include them as a special hate law does. They need<br />
special Gender designations. That SPECIAL gender designation would be<br />
different than MALE or FEMALE, they would also be separated from the<br />
other GENDERS as the M/F are from each other already.  Or at least you<br />
say so when you say they need special hate crime laws and marriage laws.</p>
<p>They are different and need special treatment like a <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>GENDER</strong> WOULD NEED.</p>
</thendestroyeveryth>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/21/children-are-made-into-sheep-and-easy-targets-for-the-gay-sexual-predators-by-the-schools-that-teach-them-that-its-hate-and-its-illegal-to-dislike-and-a-hate-crime-to-defend-themselves-from-the-gay-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In order to have Socialism you have to force people to join into your Socialist programs</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/21/in-order-to-have-socialism-you-have-to-force-people-to-join-into-your-socialist-programs/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/21/in-order-to-have-socialism-you-have-to-force-people-to-join-into-your-socialist-programs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Plimpton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HITLER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INDIVIDUAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIGHTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=25053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[> On 11/20/2011 6:12 PM, Nickname unavailable wrote: >> On Nov 20, 7:56 pm, George Plimpton wrote: >>> narcissistic clown sophist Bret Cahill blabbered: >>> >>>>>> Libertarian&#8217;s are lifestyle poseurs. They cannot and do not want to >>>>>> engage in real-life, meaningful social movements at a grand scale. >>>>>> They >>>>>> are the little partiers. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> On <strong>11</strong>/20/2011 6:12 PM, Nickname unavailable wrote:<br />
>> On Nov 20, 7:56 pm, <strong>George Plimpton</strong><geo ...@si.not>  wrote:<br />
>>> narcissistic clown sophist Bret Cahill blabbered:<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> Libertarian&#8217;s are lifestyle poseurs. They cannot and do not want to<br />
>>>>>> engage in real-life, meaningful <strong>social</strong> movements at a grand scale.<br />
>>>>>> They<br />
>>>>>> are the little partiers. Dreamers. Time-wasting fools. Killfile<br />
>>>>>> &#8216;em all.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>    agreed, also add functionally insane. but they must be exposed for<br />
>>>>> what they are, otherwise the cult will expand.<br />
>>><br />
>>>> Looneytarians are nothing more than<br />
>>><br />
>>> Libertarianism scares you to death.<br />
>><br />
>>   <strong>libertarians</strong> are the most dangerous people on earth.</p>
<p>In order to have Socialism you have to force people to join into your<br />
Socialist programs or the programs will fail due to the competition.</p>
<p>To force people you will have to steal their individual rights&#8230;.</p>
<p>Once those individual <strong>RIGHTS</strong> have been stolen, it is then a smaller step<br />
for a charismatic totalitarian leader to take a few more of your<br />
individual <strong>RIGHTS</strong> and <strong>rule</strong> you with an iron fist.</p>
<p>It is <strong>INDIVIDUAL</strong> <strong>RIGHTS</strong> that keep us free.  The more you let government<br />
steal the closer you are to being the slave of a nut case like <strong>HITLER</strong>.</p>
<p></geo></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/21/in-order-to-have-socialism-you-have-to-force-people-to-join-into-your-socialist-programs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>far-right wing nutter.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/20/far-right-wing-nutter/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/20/far-right-wing-nutter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 18:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constantly Repeating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRIME]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOOMING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FACILITIES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FACT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FORCING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GENDER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HATE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTELLIGENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LIBERALS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarian Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LOONS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PRESENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PROBLEMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAPE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TENS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WORTHLESS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=25047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 11/20/2011 2:53 AM, Dawlish wrote: > On Nov 19, 10:20 pm, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: >> Children are made into sheep and easy targets for the gay sexual >> predators by the Schools that teach them that it&#8217;s HATE and it&#8217;s illegal >> to dislike and a HATE CRIME to defend themselves from the gay [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On <strong>11</strong>/20/2011 2:53 AM, Dawlish wrote:<br />
> On Nov 19, <strong>10</strong>:20 pm, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>> Children are made into sheep and easy targets for the gay sexual<br />
>> predators by the Schools that teach them that it&#8217;s <strong>HATE</strong> and it&#8217;s illegal<br />
>> to dislike and a <strong>HATE</strong> <strong>CRIME</strong> to defend themselves from the gay predators&#8230;<br />
>><br />
>> This is the underlying problem with government schools, they teach the<br />
>> Democrat-Socialist agenda hidden as an under the desk education that is<br />
>> forced on all students.<br />
>><br />
>> On <strong>11</strong>/19/2011 8:20 AM, (¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯)<br />
>><br />
>> <a href="http://www.TravelForPay.org" >http://www.TravelForPay.org</a> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>      [[[[    RESOURCE POST:  *FACTS* Don't Change.<br />
>>>               And Constantly *Repeating* Them is <strong>DOOMING</strong><br />
>>>               the Bigots' IRRATIONAL Hate-Agendas!   ]]]]<br />
>><br />
>>>     Egalitarians are <strong>INTELLIGENT</strong> enough to know that once FACTS<br />
>>> that are *devastating* to all bigots and their hate-agendas &#8211;<br />
>>> especially the ones that seek to *victimize* <strong>TENS</strong> of MILLIONS of<br />
>>> people by blocking them from (1) having across-the-board EQUAL<br />
>>> rights for all LGBT people, including Marriage Equality&#8230; for abso-<br />
>>> lutely NO good reason, and<br />
>><br />
>> We see one reason that jumped out at us this month, <acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym> that are after<br />
>> young boys in the public showers&#8230;..<br />
>><br />
>> If <acronym title="Gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> G&*$?%s</span></acronym> are different and need Gay Hate crime laws and need gay<br />
>> Marriage, then they also need *<strong>GENDER</strong> SPECIFIC <strong>FACILITIES</strong>* . and need to<br />
>> be kept out of locker rooms for heterosexuals.  The <acronym title="Gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> G&*$?%s</span></acronym> need a (G) for<br />
>> their sex on their drivers license.  Anyone known to have gay sex should<br />
>> be so designated permanently.    Then when caught in a boys facilities<br />
>> they can be chastised just as boys slipping into the girls bath room<br />
>> are,  and marked as sexual predators or stalkers.  As Men hanging out in<br />
>> the girls bathrooms are.<br />
>><br />
>> Then there&#8217;s military bunks boys camps&#8230;.. and other NOT so private<br />
>> areas where <acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym> can stalk and cruise for vulnerable situations with<br />
>> boys or men.    <acronym title="Gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> G&*$?%s</span></acronym> RIGHTS have been placed above the RIGHTS of hetero<br />
>> sexual men&#8230;.   <strong>HATE</strong> LAWS have replaced <strong>social</strong> taboos that once kept<br />
>> <acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym> from attacking/molesting young men are NOW making hetero sexual men<br />
>> targets for older gay sexual predators.   A fist was once used to<br />
>> warn-off <acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym> and it is NOW a <strong>HATE</strong> <strong>CRIME</strong>. Children are made into sheep<br />
>> and easy targets for the gay sexual predators by the Schools that teach<br />
>> them that it is illegal to dislike or defend themselves from the gay<br />
>> predators&#8230;<br />
>><br />
>> It is the *government that has created the NEW <strong>PROBLEMS</strong>* through <strong>social</strong><br />
>> engineering.<br />
>><br />
>>> (2) IRRATIONALLY seeking to hurl the<br />
>>> USAback into the pre-1973 Dark Ages of <strong>FORCING</strong> girls and wom-<br />
>>> en to gestate <strong>WORTHLESS</strong>-when-UNwanted pregnancies to term<br />
>>> against their will (a very real and unconscionable 9-month-long<br />
>>> form of <strong>RAPE</strong>)&#8230;have been marshalled and presented WELL &#8211;<br />
>>> the BEST way to put those resources to use is to RE-<strong>PRESENT</strong><br />
>>> them *every* time that it is appropriate to do so.<br />
>><br />
>> The dark ages when they killed babies? Yes that is true, we are in the<br />
>> darkest of the baby killing ages where millions are killed despite the<br />
>> <strong>FACT</strong> that we have drugs and condoms and sterilization and more that can<br />
>> prevent the fertilization and creation of a person.<br />
>><br />
>> If you can call a corporation a person, isn&#8217;t it obvious that a human<br />
>> baby in or out of a uterus is a person.  First of all there is no<br />
>> specific mention that a person can NOT reside in a uterus. Secondly the<br />
>> GPS coordinates of a person inside the united States territory can be in<br />
>> a uterus. There is no distinction for person-hood.  A person is a live<br />
>> human inside of the united states.<br />
>><br />
>> A &#8220;citizen&#8221; is a person born inside the united states.<br />
>><br />
>> <strong>NOTE</strong> the distinction that a citizen is &#8220;born&#8221; inside the united States<br />
>> or naturalized after their birth, but they are still a person if they<br />
>> are in the united states and are NOT a citizen.<br />
>><br />
>> It isn&#8217;t a question of what &#8220;you&#8221; want, it&#8217;s a question of another<br />
>> persons RIGHTS&#8230;..   You get tired of your kids you can *NOT* just kill<br />
>> them under our constitution because they are persons with RIGHTS.   As<br />
>> is a person in the uterus.<br />
>><br />
>> The <strong>FACT</strong> you have committed a million murders a year is no reason to<br />
>> keep murdering a million children a year.<br />
>><br />
>> Vegans that can&#8217;t eat meat because they love all the little animals are<br />
>> a measure of your hypocrisy as they are mostly Democrat-Socialists that<br />
>> are willing to kill a human life but then make such a stink over their<br />
>> NOT killing animals to eat.<br />
>><br />
>> The ignorance of the LEFT-<strong>WING</strong> <strong>LOONS</strong> is colossal.<br />
><br />
> far-right wing nutter.</p>
<p>Actually NO&#8230;.   I also want drugs to be legalized and end the Drug War.</p>
<p>I want to cut military spending.</p>
<p>I want to raise taxes on all those that pay none.</p>
<p>Limit government invasion of privacy, and like the patriot act.</p>
<p>I have tendencies that aren&#8217;t RIGHT <strong>WING</strong>.</p>
</thendestroyeveryth>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/20/far-right-wing-nutter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Children are made into sheep and easy targets for the gay sexual predators by the Schools that teach them that it&#8217;s HATE and it&#8217;s illegal to dislike and a HATE CRIME to defend themselves from the gay predators&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/19/children-are-made-into-sheep-and-easy-targets-for-the-gay-sexual-predators-by-the-schools-that-teach-them-that-its-hate-and-its-illegal-to-dislike-and-a-hate-crime-to-defend-themselves-from-the-gay/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/19/children-are-made-into-sheep-and-easy-targets-for-the-gay-sexual-predators-by-the-schools-that-teach-them-that-its-hate-and-its-illegal-to-dislike-and-a-hate-crime-to-defend-themselves-from-the-gay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 19:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constantly Repeating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRIME]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOOMING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FACILITIES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FACT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FORCING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GENDER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HATE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTELLIGENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LOONS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PROBLEMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAPE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIGHTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TENS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WORTHLESS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=25017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Children are made into sheep and easy targets for the gay sexual predators by the Schools that teach them that it&#8217;s HATE and it&#8217;s illegal to dislike and a HATE CRIME to defend themselves from the gay predators&#8230; This is the underlying problem with government schools, they teach the Democrat-Socialist agenda hidden as an under [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Children are made into sheep and easy targets for the gay sexual<br />
predators by the Schools that teach them that it&#8217;s <strong>HATE</strong> and it&#8217;s illegal<br />
to dislike and a <strong>HATE</strong> <strong>CRIME</strong> to defend themselves from the gay predators&#8230;</p>
<p>This is the underlying problem with government schools, they teach the<br />
Democrat-Socialist agenda hidden as an under the desk education that is<br />
forced on all students.</p>
<p>On <strong>11</strong>/19/2011 8:20 AM, (¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯)<br />
<a href="http://www.TravelForPay.org" >http://www.TravelForPay.org</a> wrote:<br />
><br />
>      [[[[    RESOURCE POST:  *FACTS* Don't Change.<br />
>               And Constantly *Repeating* Them is <strong>DOOMING</strong><br />
>               the Bigots' IRRATIONAL Hate-Agendas!   ]]]]<br />
><br />
><br />
>     Egalitarians are <strong>INTELLIGENT</strong> enough to know that once FACTS<br />
> that are *devastating* to all bigots and their hate-agendas &#8211;<br />
> especially the ones that seek to *victimize* <strong>TENS</strong> of MILLIONS of<br />
> people by blocking them from (1) having across-the-board EQUAL<br />
> rights for all <strong>LGBT</strong> people, including Marriage Equality&#8230; for abso-<br />
> lutely NO good reason, and</p>
<p>We see one reason that jumped out at us this month, <acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym> that are after<br />
young boys in the public showers&#8230;..</p>
<p>If <acronym title="Gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> G&*$?%s</span></acronym> are different and need Gay Hate crime laws and need gay<br />
Marriage, then they also need *<strong>GENDER</strong> SPECIFIC <strong>FACILITIES</strong>* . and need to<br />
be kept out of locker rooms for heterosexuals.  The <acronym title="Gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> G&*$?%s</span></acronym> need a (G) for<br />
their sex on their drivers license.  Anyone known to have gay sex should<br />
be so designated permanently.    Then when caught in a boys facilities<br />
they can be chastised just as boys slipping into the girls bath room<br />
are,  and marked as sexual predators or stalkers.  As Men hanging out in<br />
the girls bathrooms are.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s military bunks boys camps&#8230;.. and other NOT so private<br />
areas where <acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym> can stalk and cruise for vulnerable situations with<br />
boys or men.    <acronym title="Gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> G&*$?%s</span></acronym> <strong>RIGHTS</strong> have been placed above the <strong>RIGHTS</strong> of hetero<br />
sexual men&#8230;.   <strong>HATE</strong> LAWS have replaced <strong>social</strong> taboos that once kept<br />
<acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym> from attacking/molesting young men are NOW making hetero sexual men<br />
targets for older gay sexual predators.   A fist was once used to<br />
warn-off <acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym> and it is NOW a <strong>HATE</strong> <strong>CRIME</strong>. Children are made into sheep<br />
and easy targets for the gay sexual predators by the Schools that teach<br />
them that it is illegal to dislike or defend themselves from the gay<br />
predators&#8230;</p>
<p>It is the *government that has created the NEW <strong>PROBLEMS</strong>* through <strong>social</strong><br />
engineering.</p>
<p>> (2) IRRATIONALLY seeking to hurl the<br />
> USAback into the pre-1973 Dark Ages of <strong>FORCING</strong> girls and wom-<br />
> en to gestate <strong>WORTHLESS</strong>-when-UNwanted pregnancies to term<br />
> against their will (a very real and unconscionable 9-month-long<br />
> form of <strong>RAPE</strong>)&#8230;have been marshalled and presented WELL &#8211;<br />
> the BEST way to put those resources to use is to RE-PRESENT<br />
> them *every* time that it is appropriate to do so.</p>
<p>The dark ages when they killed babies? Yes that is true, we are in the<br />
darkest of the baby killing ages where millions are killed despite the<br />
<strong>FACT</strong> that we have drugs and condoms and sterilization and more that can<br />
prevent the fertilization and creation of a person.</p>
<p>If you can call a corporation a person, isn&#8217;t it obvious that a human<br />
baby in or out of a uterus is a person.  First of all there is no<br />
specific mention that a person can NOT reside in a uterus. Secondly the<br />
GPS coordinates of a person inside the united States territory can be in<br />
a uterus. There is no distinction for person-hood.  A person is a live<br />
human inside of the united states.</p>
<p>A &#8220;citizen&#8221; is a person born inside the united states.</p>
<p><strong>NOTE</strong> the distinction that a citizen is &#8220;born&#8221; inside the united States<br />
or naturalized after their birth, but they are still a person if they<br />
are in the united states and are NOT a citizen.</p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t a question of what &#8220;you&#8221; want, it&#8217;s a question of another<br />
persons <strong>RIGHTS</strong>&#8230;..   You get tired of your kids you can *NOT* just kill<br />
them under our constitution because they are persons with <strong>RIGHTS</strong>.   As<br />
is a person in the uterus.</p>
<p>The <strong>FACT</strong> you have committed a million murders a year is no reason to<br />
keep murdering a million children a year.</p>
<p>Vegans that can&#8217;t eat meat because they love all the little animals are<br />
a measure of your hypocrisy as they are mostly Democrat-Socialists that<br />
are willing to kill a human life but then make such a stink over their<br />
NOT killing animals to eat.</p>
<p>The ignorance of the LEFT-<strong>WING</strong> <strong>LOONS</strong> is colossal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/19/children-are-made-into-sheep-and-easy-targets-for-the-gay-sexual-predators-by-the-schools-that-teach-them-that-its-hate-and-its-illegal-to-dislike-and-a-hate-crime-to-defend-themselves-from-the-gay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Oral History of the Occupy Wall Street Movement&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/18/an-oral-history-of-the-occupy-wall-street-movement/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/18/an-oral-history-of-the-occupy-wall-street-movement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 18:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AKA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Assemblies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Percent History Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rev Dr Lenny Flank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=24971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 11/17/2011 8:44 PM, &#8216;Rev Dr&#8217; Lenny Flank wrote: > &#8220;This is the first communique from the 99 percent. We are occupying > Wall Street.&#8221; With those words, the Occupy Wall Street movement > announced its presence to the world. Within just four weeks, the > Occupy movement spread across the country and around the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On <strong>11</strong>/17/2011 8:44 PM, &#8216;Rev Dr&#8217; Lenny Flank wrote:<br />
> &#8220;This is the first communique from the 99 percent. We are occupying<br />
> <strong>Wall Street</strong>.&#8221; With those words, the Occupy <strong>Wall Street</strong> movement<br />
> announced its presence to the world. Within just four weeks, the<br />
> Occupy movement spread across the country and around the globe, and<br />
> drastically changed the terms of political debate in the <strong>US</strong>. <strong>OWS</strong> is<br />
> the first mass movement to appear in the <strong>US</strong> during the Internet age.<br />
> Technically savvy, the Occupiers posted events as they happened, on<br />
> the Web, Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr, YouTube, livestreams, blogs, and<br />
> other online resources. There were gripping accounts of being in the<br />
> center of police actions in Boston and <strong>New York</strong>. There were hopeful<br />
> pleas for <strong>social</strong> <strong>change</strong>. There were energetic calls to action. There<br />
> were thoughtful descriptions of a new way of political organizing that<br />
> had never been seen before in the <strong>US</strong>, revolving around words like<br />
> &#8220;<strong>General Assemblies</strong>&#8221; and &#8220;consensus&#8221; and &#8220;<strong>Working</strong> Groups&#8221;. <strong>OWS</strong> was not<br />
> only making history&#8211;it was writing it as well. This is the story of<br />
> Occupy <strong>Wall Street</strong>, in its own words. All proceeds from this book are<br />
> being donated to the Occupy <strong>Wall Street</strong> Movement.<br />
><br />
> <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Voices-99-Percent-History-Movement/dp/1610010221" >http://www.amazon.com/Voices-99-Percent-History-Movement/dp/1610010221</a></p>
<p>When has 99% of this country agreed on anything?</p>
<p>This is a scam, trying to scam the other 80% since Occupy (<strong>AKA</strong>)<br />
Obama-ville is less than what 20% of the people are thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/18/an-oral-history-of-the-occupy-wall-street-movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rick Perry hits a home run.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/15/rick-perry-hits-a-home-run/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/15/rick-perry-hits-a-home-run/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BORROWING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ENDLESSLY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FRIVOLOUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PASSING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PRINTING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prostitutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smugglers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States Ratify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VALUE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=24815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*The Tea Party credo* 1. Smaller government via Economic freedom and responsibility 2. Protect, reaffirm and defend the Constitution 3. National Security +&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-+ Rick Perry is starting to embrace some of the plan that I have been creating for several years, to bring America back from the brink. Perry said he would pursue a 7 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*The Tea Party credo*<br />
1. Smaller government via Economic freedom and responsibility<br />
2. Protect, reaffirm and defend the Constitution<br />
3. National Security<br />
+&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-+</p>
<p>Rick Perry is starting to embrace some of the plan that I have been<br />
creating for several years, to bring America back from the brink.</p>
<p>Perry said he would pursue a 7 year sunset clause on all laws so that<br />
any laws that are NOT needed will be automatically trash-canned and no<br />
longer remain a law.   I posted that addition to this plan just a few<br />
years ago.</p>
<p>+&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-+<br />
*Give America back to real Americans*</p>
<p>Reducing <strong>regulations</strong> is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more <strong>regulations</strong>, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
<strong>regulations</strong> are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression.</p>
<p>End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
<strong>prostitutes</strong> when there are so many legal tax paying <strong>prostitutes</strong> out there?</p>
<p>Have the <strong>States Ratify</strong> an <strong>amendment</strong> withdrawing the 16th <strong>amendment</strong>&#8230;<br />
Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (<strong>Federal</strong> sales<br />
tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or <strong>VALUE</strong> ADDED <strong>TAX</strong>* with the same <strong>amendment</strong> that<br />
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a <strong>Federal</strong> *NEW ITEM* sales tax.</p>
<p>This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
*GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add to<br />
the <strong>amendment</strong> that *if congress raises any tax by* 1% *they are forced*<br />
*to cut*<br />
every single expenditure of the *government by* 3%.</p>
<p>Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
of our military bases along the southern <strong>Border</strong> to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the <strong>Border</strong> patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
<strong>Federal</strong> trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases.</p>
<p>This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
outside the USA. That will make it harder for <strong>smugglers</strong> to get money out<br />
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch <strong>smugglers</strong>. We<br />
are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
borrow like income tax does.</p>
<p>This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less <strong>welfare</strong> and charge them<br />
tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>Pass an <strong>amendment</strong> to the constitution that makes all<br />
*laws_and_treaties* *have a seven year sunset clause* ,and it requires<br />
that each law/treaty be *voted by a separate roll call vote* every seven<br />
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.</p>
<p>There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. And a<br />
constitutional <strong>amendment</strong> to limit the Interstate Commerce Clause. The<br />
politicians use that clause to justify all sorts of socialist <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>. The<br />
founding fathers never meant for it to be so broadly applied. Limit it<br />
with an <strong>amendment</strong>, so government can&#8217;t justify every crazy idea by<br />
saying its legal under the interstate commerce clause.</p>
<p>Pass another <strong>amendment</strong> creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP <strong>CONGRESS</strong> FROM <strong>PASSING</strong> <strong>FRIVOLOUS</strong><br />
LAWS TAXES AND <strong>BORROWING</strong> AND <strong>ENDLESSLY</strong> <strong>PRINTING</strong> <strong>MONEY</strong>.</p>
<p>To quit filling the jails with people over *<strong>social</strong> taboos* , we<br />
need to take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;<strong>social</strong> engineer&#8221; businesses or<br />
private people by removing the governments use of tax code to manipulate<br />
people.</p>
<p>Government needs to spend <strong>10</strong>% less every year until they meet the<br />
income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
force an across the board spending freeze and then across the board cuts<br />
on the government spending, to do that we have to include a law in our<br />
<strong>TAX</strong> <strong>amendment</strong> to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
federal sales tax increase would result in automatic spending cuts using<br />
a baseline of <strong>10</strong>% taxes.</p>
<p>And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
them fight their own fights. We also need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
committing, we need fewer police and prisons to support&#8230;. the above<br />
drug and tax plan, will reduce police and prison needs by at least that<br />
<strong>10</strong>% that this plan suggested cutting each year.</p>
<p>NO <strong>welfare</strong> to corporations, and cut <strong>welfare</strong> to private people by <strong>10</strong>%<br />
each year until it is <strong>10</strong>% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
in <strong>DEEP</strong> for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/15/rick-perry-hits-a-home-run/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Looneytarian Internal Contradiction</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/15/another-looneytarian-internal-contradiction/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/15/another-looneytarian-internal-contradiction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=24813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 11/15/2011 11:22 AM, Bret Cahill wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taxation destroys liberty. That&#8217;s how collectivists do it. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taxes >>>>>>>>>>>>>> &#8220;Taxes are what we pay for civilized society.&#8221; Justice Oliver >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wendell >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Holmes Jr. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Rubbish. >> >>>>>>>>>>>> oh dear, of my my. looks like other rugged individual types , >>>>>>>>>>>> understand this, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On <strong>11</strong>/15/2011 <strong>11</strong>:22 AM, Bret Cahill wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taxation destroys liberty. That&#8217;s how collectivists do it.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taxes<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> &#8220;Taxes are what we pay for civilized society.&#8221; Justice Oliver<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wendell<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Holmes Jr.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rubbish.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> oh dear, of my my. looks like other rugged individual types ,<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> understand this,<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> Taxes are what we pay for civilized society.&#8221; Justice Oliver<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> Wendell<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> Holmes Jr.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>> So if you taxed people at 100%, they&#8217;d enjoy more civilization.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>> <strong>HA</strong> <strong>HA</strong> <strong>HA</strong> <strong>HA</strong> <strong>HA</strong> <strong>HA</strong> <strong>HA</strong>! You <acronym title="fucking"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> f&*$?%g</span></acronym> idiot.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>> only a extremist would say what you just said.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>> It refutes your <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym> about <strong>taxes</strong> being the price of civilized<br />
>>>>>>>>> society.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>> I&#8217;ve always thought it would be fair for the society to permit<br />
>>>>>>>> people to opt out of paying <strong>taxes</strong> and therefore not participate<br />
>>>>>>>> in the civilized society.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>> No police protection, no firefighters, cannot drive on public<br />
>>>>>>>> roads, can&#8217;t eat food that has been inspected, kids can&#8217;t go<br />
>>>>>>>> to public schools. No <strong>social</strong> security or medicare. No access to<br />
>>>>>>>> national parks or monuments. Anything stemming from national<br />
>>>>>>>> defense would be forbidden. The list could be almost endless.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>> But you don&#8217;t have to pay <strong>taxes</strong>! Does it sound like a deal to<br />
>>>>>>>> you George? If so I&#8217;m all for you getting that option.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>> I want to pay lower <strong>taxes</strong>.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> You aren&#8217;t very bright are you George.<br />
>><br />
>>>>> Plenty bright.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> How about if the civilized people<br />
>><br />
>>>>> You mean the parasites.<br />
>><br />
>>>>> What good would that do them?<br />
>><br />
>>>> But this is all about you.<br />
>><br />
>>> You didn&#8217;t answer the question.  What good would it do the parasites if<br />
>>> they killed me?<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> just throw you off the train. No <strong>taxes</strong> for you, and<br />
>>>>>> nothing else either.<br />
>><br />
>>>>> So, the parasites get to decide whether I live or die? That&#8217;s not<br />
>>>>> civilization.<br />
>><br />
>>>> Afraid to walk the talk?<br />
>><br />
>>> Answer the question, <acronym title="cocksucker"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%r</span></acronym>:  What good would it do the parasites,<br />
>>> other than feeding their sense of <strong>power</strong>?<br />
>><br />
>>  no one is stopping you from moving.<br />
><br />
> Looneytarians always blame their paralysis on their lack of &#8220;<strong>freedom</strong>&#8221;<br />
> because of [elective] gummint.</p>
<p>Solyndra&#8230;  was a <strong>money</strong> laundering scheme.</p>
<p>This is warping the political process of [elective] government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/15/another-looneytarian-internal-contradiction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taxing the 1%</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/15/taxing-the-1-4/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/15/taxing-the-1-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Day Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=24807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 11/15/2011 10:50 AM, Nickname unavailable wrote: > On Nov 11, 1:44 pm, Immortalist wrote: >> On Nov 10, 8:08 pm, D&#038;*$?%n wrote: >> >>> Thing is the 99% Occupy movement is global. So, if we decide to tax >>> the rich, where are they gonna go with the money? >> >> A return to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On <strong>11</strong>/15/2011 <strong>10</strong>:50 AM, Nickname unavailable wrote:<br />
> On Nov <strong>11</strong>, 1:44 pm, Immortalist <reanimater_2 ...@yahoo.com> wrote:<br />
>> On Nov <strong>10</strong>, 8:08 pm, <strong><acronym title="Day Brown"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> D&*$?%n</span></acronym></strong> <dayhbr ...@gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>> Thing is the 99% Occupy movement is global. So, if we decide to tax<br />
>>> the rich, where are they gonna go with the <strong>money</strong>?<br />
>><br />
>> A return to Eisenhower-era 90% top tax rates helps fix our economy in<br />
>> several ways:<br />
>><br />
>> 1) It makes it take longer to end up with a fortune. In fact it makes<br />
>> people build and earn a fortune, instead of shooting for quick<br />
>> windfalls. This forces long-term thinking and planning instead of<br />
>> short-term scheming and scamming. If grabbing everything in sight and<br />
>> running doesn’t pay off anymore, you have to <strong>change</strong> your strategy.</p>
<p>It destroys the private sector economy&#8230;.</p>
<p>To start with you destroy the Lottery and it&#8217;s income to the States tax<br />
for the treasury.</p>
<p>Will the income tax at 90% replace that?</p>
<p>Not only won&#8217;t I buy a Lotto ticket, I will only work 6 months a year.<br />
NO need to work hard, and the time I don&#8217;t work I would seek off the<br />
books ways to make my <strong>money</strong> work for me.   You lose 100% of the tax I<br />
earn from other non conventional streams.</p>
<p>How will a Basket ball player pay for their old age when you have 60-90%<br />
of their <strong>money</strong>?</p>
<p>Their career only lasts <strong>10</strong>-15 years.  Then they are virtually crippled<br />
with injuries.</p>
<p>Excessive <strong>taxes</strong> and excessive <strong>regulations</strong> create less mainstream<br />
economic activity and creates more under the table economic activity and<br />
that creates more criminals and that ends up spiraling down into <strong>social</strong><br />
destruction and a breakdown in government.</p>
<p></dayhbr></reanimater_2></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/15/taxing-the-1-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Don&#8217;t Looneytarians Believe Free Speech On Economic Issues Is Free Speech?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/12/why-dont-looneytarians-believe-free-speech-on-economic-issues-is-free-speech-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/12/why-dont-looneytarians-believe-free-speech-on-economic-issues-is-free-speech-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 19:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Plimpton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[include]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Harassment Panda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utopia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=24673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 11/12/2011 2:19 PM, George Plimpton wrote: > On 11/12/2011 11:56 AM, Sexual Harassment Panda wrote: >> George Plimpton wrote: >> >>> On 11/12/2011 11:22 AM, Sexual Harassment Panda wrote: >>>> Bret Cahill wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> &#8220;Can you name one example of a free market free trade that isn&#8217;t >>>>>>> preceded by free speech? >>>>>> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On <strong>11</strong>/12/2011 2:19 PM, <strong>George Plimpton</strong> wrote:<br />
> On <strong>11</strong>/12/2011 <strong>11</strong>:56 AM, <strong>Sexual Harassment Panda</strong> wrote:<br />
>> <strong>George Plimpton</strong> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>> On <strong>11</strong>/12/2011 <strong>11</strong>:22 AM, <strong>Sexual Harassment Panda</strong> wrote:<br />
>>>> Bret Cahill wrote:<br />
>>>><br />
>>>>>>> &#8220;Can you name one example of a free market free trade that isn&#8217;t<br />
>>>>>>> preceded by free speech?<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> Bret Cahill<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>     You mean other than the one I posted three years ago?  The<br />
>>>>>> example of selling a Koran when you&#8217;re not allowed to<br />
>>>>>> criticise it?<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> Why don&#8217;t looneytarians believe the <strong>freedom</strong> of speech to post a price<br />
>>>>> is free speech?<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> After all, if you want to posture that you are pro free marketry then<br />
>>>>> wouldn&#8217;t you want to <strong>include</strong> the precondition of free marketry, the<br />
>>>>> <strong>freedom</strong> of speech on the relevant economic issues?<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> Bret Cahill<br />
>>>> They want the market to regulate free speech.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> That is, the corporation with the most <strong>money</strong> and the largest private<br />
>>>> army<br />
>>>> gets to decide what is and is not free speech.<br />
>>><br />
>>> No, that&#8217;s not a libertarian position at all.  That&#8217;s a<br />
>>> statist/collectivist caricature.<br />
>><br />
>> It IS a libertarian position.<br />
>><br />
>> I&#8217;ll point out again that Libertarians have a huge blind spot about<br />
>> corporations. It would be they who would <strong>rule</strong> us, not ourselves under a<br />
>> libertarian &#8216;<strong>utopia</strong>&#8216;.<br />
><br />
> I&#8217;ll point out that leftists have an irrational obsession with<br />
> corporations as a form of business organization.  In fact, what you<br />
> leftists hate is *business* &#8211; private enterprise.  The fact that the<br />
> biggest firms typically are corporations is immaterial to your hatred.<br />
><br />
> Here&#8217;s a tasty irony that leftists never get:  huge corporations exist<br />
> because the left wants them to exist.  Leftist policy always creates an<br />
> <strong>environment</strong> in which size confers advantage due to scale economies in<br />
> having to comply with corrosive left-wing policy.  Left-wing <strong>social</strong>,<br />
> economic and regulatory policy forces consolidation because bigger firms<br />
> can meet the absurd regulatory burden more cheaply than can smaller firms.</p>
<p>End game is to get them big and then have control of them via the<br />
<strong>regulations</strong>&#8230;..</p>
<p>Many small businesses creates chaos and they can&#8217;t control it as easily,<br />
remember that Socialism &#8220;is&#8221; central planning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/12/why-dont-looneytarians-believe-free-speech-on-economic-issues-is-free-speech-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Herman Cain FLED the hearing. Clinton stayed and fought.  Penn State decides to Run and hide.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/08/herman-cain-fled-the-hearing-clinton-stayed-and-fought-penn-state-decides-to-run-and-hide/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/08/herman-cain-fled-the-hearing-clinton-stayed-and-fought-penn-state-decides-to-run-and-hide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 20:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHILD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Benders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LIBERALS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarian Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MALE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Mon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoorghis Jurgis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Young Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=24449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 11/8/2011 1:00 PM, Acid Washed China Blue Jeans wrote: > In article &#60;4EB975B1.1050304 @&#038;*$?%blackhole.nebulax.com>, > BeamMeUpScotty wrote: > >> On 11/8/2011 11:45 AM, Acid Washed China Blue Jeans wrote: >>> In article &#60;4EB96675.3010403 @&#038;*$?%blackhole.nebulax.com>, >>> BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>> >>>> On 11/7/2011 5:38 PM, Yoorghis @&#038;*$?%Jurgis.net wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 13:03:09 -0500, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On <strong>11</strong>/8/2011 1:00 PM, Acid Washed <strong>China</strong> Blue Jeans wrote:<br />
> In article &lt;4EB975B1.1050304<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>blackhole.nebulax.com>,<br />
>  BeamMeUpScotty
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> On <strong>11</strong>/8/2011 <strong>11</strong>:45 AM, Acid Washed <strong>China</strong> Blue Jeans wrote:<br />
>>> In article &lt;4EB96675.3010403<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>blackhole.nebulax.com>,<br />
>>>  BeamMeUpScotty </thendestroyeverything>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>> On <strong>11</strong>/7/2011 5:38 PM, <a href="mailto:Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net">Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
>>>>> <strong>On Mon</strong>, 07 Nov 2011 13:03:09 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>>>>> </thendestroyeverything>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> Both parties consented.  Cain forced it and fled the second<br />
>>>>>>> harrassment hearing.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> Pedophiles use that same excuse.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> Cain was harassing a child?<br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> That was the Penn State college that allowed child molestation wasn&#8217;t<br />
>>>> it&#8230;.  you know the educated people, the smartest of all the<br />
>>>> Liberal-Socialists.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Yeah, football has long been a hotbed of Liberal-Socialism. Hence its<br />
>>> popularity<br />
>>> in Texas and rest of the southeast.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> NOT my back yard, I chase the child molesters away from my back yard.<br />
>><br />
>> It&#8217;s comical and sad at the same time how Liberal-Socialists make<br />
>> accusations and then they always manage to do something far worse.<br />
><br />
> Perhaps you should look at the situation more closely. Some of the incidents<br />
> happenned at the university, but otherwise it was not about the university and<br />
> its Liberal-Socialist hotbeddism. That involves minors should be a big clue they<br />
> were not university students. It involved a non-profit founded by Sandusky.<br />
><br />
>> Lets send all kids to Liberal-Socialist colleges for a socialist<br />
>> education including educations in Homosexual and pedophilia activity in<br />
>> the Showers.<br />
><br />
> Yes, the jocks of the <strong>PE</strong> departments have always been the centres of<br />
> Liberal-Socialism; the art departments are filled with fascists; engineering<br />
> with <strong>Young Republicans</strong>; math with <strong>ROTC</strong>; zebras are reactionaries; antelopes are<br />
> missionaries; pigeons plot in secrecy; and hamsters turn on frequently.<br />
><br />
>> NOT just a <strong>CHILD</strong>&#8230; but a <strong>MALE</strong> child targeted by a Homosexual.<br />
><br />
> Are you saying it&#8217;s okay to target a FEMALE child?</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m&#8221; saying that homosexual access to the <strong>MALE</strong> showers is NOT a great<br />
idea.   As is male access to the woman&#8217;s showers.</p>
<p>Would you have the hetero sexual men and women shower and get naked<br />
together in open showers and toilets?    You Know, have them do what<br />
creates sexual arousal for one or both of them?   Not that sex is evil<br />
but there is a time and place and public gym showers/toilets isn&#8217;t it.</p>
<p>There needs to be single person facilities for the 2% that are gender<br />
bending. They need to have no place that they or others are sexually<br />
harassed by onlookers who see sexual arousal when they look at one<br />
another.   I have (M) on my documents as <strong>MALE</strong>, since <acronym title="Gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> G&*$?%s</span></acronym> have decided<br />
they are NOT Male but Gay they need a (G).</p>
<p>Until now it was a <strong>social</strong> taboo for a gay man in the showers to be<br />
&#8220;overly interested&#8221; in anyone, today that taboo is labeled a *hate*<br />
crime so *now* you need to separate <strong>Gender Benders</strong> from the 98% that are<br />
either male or female genders that are already separated.</p>
</thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/08/herman-cain-fled-the-hearing-clinton-stayed-and-fought-penn-state-decides-to-run-and-hide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did a Harvard economics class cause the financial crisis? Students walk out of lecture that &#8216;has driven inequalities in society&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/07/did-a-harvard-economics-class-cause-the-financial-crisis-students-walk-out-of-lecture-that-has-driven-inequalities-in-society/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/07/did-a-harvard-economics-class-cause-the-financial-crisis-students-walk-out-of-lecture-that-has-driven-inequalities-in-society/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 16:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDIOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[include]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jai Maharaj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jyotishi Om Shanti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lydia Warren Last]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President George]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prof Mankiw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professor Greg Mankiw Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROTFLOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandalow Ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VILLAGE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=24347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 11/7/2011 11:38 AM, Nickname unavailable wrote: > On Nov 7, 6:19 am, use&#8230;@mantra.com and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. > Jai Maharaj) wrote: >> Did a Harvard economics class cause the financial crisis? Students >> walk out of lecture that &#8216;has driven inequalities in society&#8217; >> >> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2058319/Did-Harvard-economics&#8230; >> >> Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi >> Om Shanti > [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On <strong>11</strong>/7/2011 <strong>11</strong>:38 AM, Nickname unavailable wrote:<br />
> On Nov 7, 6:19 am, <a href="mailto:use...@mantra.com">use&#8230;@mantra.com</a> and/or <a href="http://www.mantra.com/jai" >www.mantra.com/jai</a> (Dr.<br />
> <strong>Jai Maharaj</strong>) wrote:<br />
>> Did a Harvard economics class cause the financial crisis? Students<br />
>> walk out of lecture that &#8216;has driven inequalities in society&#8217;<br />
>><br />
>> <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2058319/Did-Harvard-economics..." >http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2058319/Did-Harvard-economics&#8230;</a><br />
>><br />
>> <strong>Jai Maharaj</strong>, Jyotishi<br />
>> Om Shanti<br />
><br />
>  <strong>ROTFLOL</strong>. it just shows you how failure is rewarded in a plutocracy !!<br />
> free market, supply side, trickle down chicanery has never worked.<br />
> yet, the cult rewards the faithful spreaders of failure.<br />
>  the guy belongs in a mental institution at least, but in reality,<br />
> <strong>jail</strong>.<br />
><br />
><br />
><br />
> <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2058319/Did-Harvard-economics-class-cause-financial-crisis-Students-walk-lecture.html" >http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2058319/Did-Harvard-economics-class-cause-financial-crisis-Students-walk-lecture.html</a><br />
><br />
> Did a Harvard economics class cause the financial crisis? Students<br />
> walk out of lecture that &#8216;has driven inequalities in society&#8217;<br />
><br />
> By Lydia Warren<br />
> Last updated at 9:58 AM on 7th November 2011<br />
><br />
><br />
> It has spread from <strong>New York</strong> to <strong>Europe</strong> and as far afield as Mongolia.<br />
> And now a new, perhaps unlikely, location has been caught in the<br />
> Occupy <strong>Wall Street</strong> crossfire: a Harvard economics class.<br />
> Around 70 students walked out of Professor Greg Mankiw&#8217;s Economics 10<br />
> class this week, claiming his teachings have driven the inequalities<br />
> in today’s society.<br />
><br />
><br />
> In an open letter, they suggest his conservative curriculum has<br />
> influenced former Harvard students – including today’s policy makers<br />
> and bankers – to bring about the financial crisis.<br />
> Students had expected a class that included &#8216;a critical discussion of<br />
> both the benefits and flaws of different economic simplifying models&#8217;.<br />
><br />
><br />
> But they said the class &#8216;does not <strong>include</strong> primary sources and rarely<br />
> features articles from academic journals, [so] we have very little<br />
> access to alternative approaches to economics&#8217;.<br />
> They write: &#8216;We found a course that espouses a specific – and limited<br />
> – view of economics that we believe perpetuates problematic and<br />
> inefficient systems of economic inequality in our society today.<br />
> &#8216;We are deeply concerned about the way that this bias affects<br />
> students, the University, and our greater society.&#8217;<br />
> <strong>Prof Mankiw</strong>, who advised <strong>President George</strong> W. Bush and now <strong>Mitt Romney</strong>,<br />
> has written two widely used economics textbooks. In one, he called the<br />
> idea that tax cuts pay for themselves &#8216;fad economics&#8217;.<br />
> At 700 students, the class has the highest enrollment of any<br />
> undergraduate course at the university.<br />
><br />
> The protesters suggested this influence has played a key part in the<br />
> financial crisis, writing: &#8216;Harvard graduates play major roles in the<br />
> financial institutions and in shaping public policy around the world.&#8217;<br />
> According to the Harvard Crimson, <strong>Prof Mankiw</strong> was aware of the walkout<br />
> and made announcements at the beginning of class, saying: &#8216;I have a<br />
> feeling people might leave a little early.&#8217;</p>
<p>Remember that Obama is the *<strong>HARVARD</strong> <strong>VILLAGE</strong> <strong>IDIOT</strong>*  that has screwed the<br />
economy worse than any&#8230;.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Lr1M1T2Y314&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /><br />
start at time stamp 5:00</p>
<p>> When the students got up to leave, some of their peers booed.<br />
> One of the organisers, Rachel J. Sandalow-Ash, told a crowd outside<br />
> the classroom: &#8216;Harvard graduates have been complicit [and] have aided<br />
> many of the worst injustices of recent years.<br />
> &#8216;Harvard students will not do that anymore. We will use our education<br />
> for good, and not for personal gain at the expense of millions.&#8217;<br />
><br />
><br />
> The professor, whose textbooks are also studied at Princeton, Yale and<br />
> Brown, said he taught &#8216;a mainstream economics course&#8217; without any<br />
> political agenda.<br />
> Speaking to the Financial Times, he added that he had &#8216;significant<br />
> respect&#8217; for the protestor’s activism.<br />
> He said: &#8216;Over recent years, I’ve seen Harvard students becoming<br />
> increasingly pre-professional. That they are sitting back and thinking<br />
> broadly about <strong>social</strong> issues &#8230; those are good questions for students<br />
> to be asking, and to the extent that Occupy <strong>Wall Street</strong> sparks debate,<br />
> that’s good.&#8217;<br />
><br />
> Read more:<br />
> <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2058319/Did-Harvard-economics-class-cause-financial-crisis-Students-walk-lecture.html#ixzz1d2QCjgMP" >http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2058319/Did-Harvard-economics-class-cause-financial-crisis-Students-walk-lecture.html#ixzz1d2QCjgMP</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/07/did-a-harvard-economics-class-cause-the-financial-crisis-students-walk-out-of-lecture-that-has-driven-inequalities-in-society/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Original plan that could have stopped this insanity</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/10/18/the-original-plan-that-could-have-stopped-this-insanity/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/10/18/the-original-plan-that-could-have-stopped-this-insanity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 01:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GREEN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prostitutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smugglers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=23703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*HOW TO ALLOW AMERICA TO SURVIVE* And give America back to Americans Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and competition would help us get out of this depression. End the &#8220;war on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*HOW TO ALLOW AMERICA TO SURVIVE*<br />
And give America back to Americans</p>
<p>Reducing <strong>regulations</strong> is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more <strong>regulations</strong>, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
<strong>regulations</strong> are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression.</p>
<p>End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
<strong>prostitutes</strong> when there are so many legal tax paying <strong>prostitutes</strong> out there?</p>
<p><a href="http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs--crime-usage-falls" >http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs&#8211;crime-usage-falls</a></p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the <strong>USA</strong> and Original Green<br />
money outside the <strong>USA</strong>&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly sending red money home to <strong>Mexico</strong> would be useless as the <strong>RED</strong><br />
money would be useless in <strong>Mexico</strong> since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad. All electronic money leaving the <strong>USA</strong> would be debited the<br />
Sales tax when the money is sent/spent.</p>
<p>The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drug smuggling less*<br />
*profitable* as would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL<br />
“<strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ITEM</strong>” SALES <strong>TAX</strong> *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A <strong>VAT</strong> <strong>TAX</strong> WHICH WILL HELP THE<br />
<strong>DRUG</strong> DEALERS and illegals by making their tax free money leaving the<br />
country even more valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the <strong>RED</strong> money<br />
for <strong>GREEN</strong> money then you would charge the sales tax at that point.</p>
<p>Have the States Ratify an <strong>amendment</strong> withdrawing the 16th <strong>amendment</strong>&#8230;<br />
Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (<strong>Federal</strong> sales<br />
tax) *BUT NOT A <strong>VAT</strong> or VALUE ADDED <strong>TAX</strong>* with the same <strong>amendment</strong> that<br />
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a <strong>Federal</strong> *<strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ITEM</strong>* sales tax.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
*<strong>GREEN</strong>* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add to<br />
the <strong>amendment</strong> that *if congress raises any tax by* 1% *they are forced*<br />
*to cut*<br />
every single expenditure of the *government by* 3%.</p>
<p>Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
of our military bases along the southern <strong>Border</strong> to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the <strong>Border</strong> patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
<strong>Federal</strong> trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases.</p>
<p>This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
outside the <strong>USA</strong>. That will make it harder for <strong>smugglers</strong> to get money out<br />
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch <strong>smugglers</strong>. We<br />
are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
borrow like income tax does.</p>
<p>This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less <strong>welfare</strong> and charge them<br />
tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>Pass an <strong>amendment</strong> to the constitution that makes all<br />
*laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.</p>
<p>There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. And a<br />
constitutional <strong>amendment</strong> to limit the Interstate Commerce Clause. The<br />
politicians use that clause to justify all sorts of socialist <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>. The<br />
founding fathers never meant for it to be so broadly applied. Limit it<br />
with an <strong>amendment</strong>, so government can&#8217;t justify every crazy idea by<br />
saying its legal under the interstate commerce clause.</p>
<p>Pass another <strong>amendment</strong> creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP <strong>CONGRESS</strong> FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING <strong>MONEY</strong>.</p>
<p>To quit filling the jails with people over *<strong>social</strong> taboos* , we<br />
need to take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;<strong>social</strong> engineer&#8221; businesses or<br />
private people by removing the governments use of tax code to manipulate<br />
people.</p>
<p>Government needs to spend <strong>10</strong>% less every year until they meet the<br />
income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
force an across the board spending freeze and then across the board cuts<br />
on the government spending, to do that we have to include a law in our<br />
<strong>TAX</strong> <strong>amendment</strong> to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
federal sales tax increase would result in automatic spending cuts using<br />
a baseline of <strong>10</strong>% taxes.</p>
<p>And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
them fight their own fights. We also need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
committing, we need fewer police and prisons to support&#8230;. the above<br />
drug and tax plan, will reduce police and prison needs by at least that<br />
<strong>10</strong>% that this plan suggested cutting each year.</p>
<p>NO <strong>welfare</strong> to corporations, and cut <strong>welfare</strong> to private people by <strong>10</strong>%<br />
each year until it is <strong>10</strong>% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
in DEEP for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/10/18/the-original-plan-that-could-have-stopped-this-insanity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Vision of The Annointed, This Book Foresaw The Climate Change Scam</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/09/28/the-vision-of-the-annointed-this-book-foresaw-the-climate-change-scam/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/09/28/the-vision-of-the-annointed-this-book-foresaw-the-climate-change-scam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 03:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Sowell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=23534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 9/28/2011 10:59 PM, DeadlyAGWBull wrote: > The Vision of The Annointed, This Book Foresaw The Climate Change Scam > > > > Thomas Sowell wrote Vision of the Anointed in 1995, and didn&#8217;t mention > climate change. Yet such is the insight of the man that what he wrote was > prescient, pertinent and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 9/28/2011 <strong>10</strong>:59 PM, DeadlyAGWBull wrote:<br />
> The Vision of The Annointed, This Book Foresaw The Climate Change Scam<br />
><br />
><br />
><br />
> <strong>Thomas Sowell</strong> wrote Vision of the Anointed in 1995, and didn&#8217;t mention<br />
> <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong>. Yet such is the insight of the man that what he wrote was<br />
> prescient, pertinent and 100% applicable 15 years later.<br />
><br />
><br />
><br />
> Our battle today follows a similar pattern to  battles over many other<br />
> <strong>social</strong> policies. Sowell discusses The <strong>War</strong> on Poverty, sex education,<br />
> affirmative action, discrimination, crime, infant mortality.<br />
><br />
><br />
><br />
> They&#8217;re unrelated to <strong>climate</strong> science, yet the tactics repeat ad nauseum.<br />
></p>
<p>Some good points, the way they&#8217;re related is their support by a<br />
political <strong>ideology</strong>, they are all different and unrelated until you look<br />
at who the driving force for legislation was.</p>
<p>Discrimination and crime are usually Republican issues and Republicans<br />
often make up the deciding votes on those, while the rest are seldom<br />
seen as a success and are unconstitutionally imposed on us by the Left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/09/28/the-vision-of-the-annointed-this-book-foresaw-the-climate-change-scam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How about a RICK PERRY/MARCO RUBIO ticket for 2012?!!</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/09/28/how-about-a-rick-perrymarco-rubio-ticket-for-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/09/28/how-about-a-rick-perrymarco-rubio-ticket-for-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amendment Incorporation Doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Bell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elvis Presley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMPORTANT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milton Friedman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REASONING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[THREE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unlike Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=23512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[>> On Sep 27, 10:29 pm, &#8220;Khadi&#8230;@forteinc.com&#8221; >> wrote: >>> On 11-09-27 07:48 PM, Charles Bell wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Sep 27, 8:39 am, &#8220;Khadi&#8230;@forteinc.com&#8221; >>>> wrote: >>>>> On 11-09-27 06:56 AM, Charles Bell wrote: >>> >>>>>> On Sep 26, 7:38 pm, &#8220;Khadi&#8230;@forteinc.com&#8221; >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> On 11-09-26 05:46 PM, Charles [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>> On Sep 27, <strong>10</strong>:29 pm, &#8220;Khadi&#8230;@forteinc.com&#8221;<br />
>> <khadijahbintmuham ...@gmail.com>  wrote:<br />
>>> On <strong>11</strong>-09-27 07:48 PM, <strong>Charles Bell</strong> wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>>> On Sep 27, 8:39 am, &#8220;Khadi&#8230;@forteinc.com&#8221;<br />
>>>> </khadijahbintmuham><khadijahbintmuham ...@gmail.com>    wrote:<br />
>>>>> On <strong>11</strong>-09-27 06:56 AM, <strong>Charles Bell</strong> wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> On Sep 26, 7:38 pm, &#8220;Khadi&#8230;@forteinc.com&#8221;<br />
>>>>>> </khadijahbintmuham><khadijahbintmuham ...@gmail.com>      wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> On <strong>11</strong>-09-26 05:46 PM, <strong>Charles Bell</strong> wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>> On Sep 26, 8:17 am, &#8220;Khadi&#8230;@forteinc.com&#8221;<br />
>>>>>>>> </khadijahbintmuham><khadijahbintmuham ...@gmail.com>        wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>> On <strong>11</strong>-09-26 05:03 AM, <strong>Charles Bell</strong> wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 25, 7:20 pm, &#8220;Khadi&#8230;@forteinc.com&#8221;<br />
>>>>>>>>>> </khadijahbintmuham><khadijahbintmuham ...@gmail.com>          wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> On <strong>11</strong>-09-25 06:01 PM, LawnGuyland wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually, I do live in <strong>TX</strong> &#8211; Austin area &#8211; and have seen this<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> state<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> plummet into the toilet under Perry&#8217;s &#8220;leadership.&#8221;  Ann<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> Richards and<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> GWB were both good govs. This guy is so crazy and<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> incompetent, I<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> shudder to think of what would happen to this country should<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> he become<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> POTUS.  My opinion. <strong>YMMV</strong>.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>> Actually, now that he&#8217;s managed to make Romney look like a<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> genuine<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> passionate politician rather than an automaton, I&#8217;m liking<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> Romney more<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> than I did.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>> There is no good reason to support a man who (1) facillitated in<br />
>>>>>>>>>> passing a morally objectionable piece of legislation in<br />
>>>>>>>>>> Romneycare and<br />
>>>>>>>>>> (2) whose 3 moral positions on <strong>abortion</strong> is a matter of political<br />
>>>>>>>>>> convenience.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> For me, (1) Went out the window when he said he&#8217;d repeal OCare<br />
>>>>>>>>> on his<br />
>>>>>>>>> first day.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>> What will go out the window is his credibiity when he is up against<br />
>>>>>>>> the Obama machinery on what a hypocrite he is, and that will be the<br />
>>>>>>>> only truth the Obama machinery will ever have to put out.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>> That&#8217;s why we have elections, to decide these things. They&#8217;re not<br />
>>>>>>> decided on USENET.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> What he did in Mass is no longer and issue for me.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>> Committing a crime of fascism against the people should always<br />
>>>>>>>> be an<br />
>>>>>>>> issue for us.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>> Not fascism. If the voters of Mass don&#8217;t want it, they can get<br />
>>>>>>> rid of<br />
>>>>>>> it. Democracy. Fascists, OTOH, decide what&#8217;s best for you,<br />
>>>>>>> whether you<br />
>>>>>>> like it or not.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>      >        As for<br />
>>>>>>>>> (2), I am a <strong>social</strong> libertarian. What two people do in the<br />
>>>>>>>>> privacy of<br />
>>>>>>>>> their doctor&#8217;s office is no concern of mine.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>> Oh, on <strong>abortion</strong>?  I correct myself: the Obama machinery can put yet<br />
>>>>>>>> only two truths out there, both on Romney&#8217;s hypocrisy.  Give me<br />
>>>>>>>> Guiliani&#8217;s position any day: that on a matter of bad constitutional<br />
>>>>>>>> law regardless of personal opinion about <strong>abortion</strong>.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>> Wow. A hypocritical politician. <img src='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
>>><br />
>>>> For one, I don&#8217;t think GWB was hypocritical, nor was Reagan. In a<br />
>>>> sense neither is Obama, he just the most plainly obvious liar.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>> Not news. They all have a bit of this, unfortunately.<br />
>>><br />
>>>> Frankly I don&#8217;t think Bachman or Cain do. Ron Paul is on pork<br />
>>>> spending.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>> On the other hand, Perry reminds me of Bush in holding to correct<br />
>>>>>>>>>> positions without the ability to explain why they are correct<br />
>>>>>>>>>> positions.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> Conceptually, I agree with this statement, and well put.<br />
>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately,<br />
>>>>>>>>> being an effective president requires <strong>THREE</strong> characteristics (at<br />
>>>>>>>>> least),<br />
>>>>>>>>> the first being &#8220;having the right position&#8221;, the second being<br />
>>>>>>>>> able to<br />
>>>>>>>>> articulate it (VERY <strong>IMPORTANT</strong>; USENET debates are an example of<br />
>>>>>>>>> how<br />
>>>>>>>>> Bush&#8217;s inability to articulate conservative positions still<br />
>>>>>>>>> haunts us),<br />
>>>>>>>>> and the third to focus on major issues and not play &#8220;smallball&#8221;<br />
>>>>>>>>> (which<br />
>>>>>>>>> is where <strong>Michele Bachmann</strong> loses me.)<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>> Yeah. it seems a trivial matter, but her confusing <strong>Elvis Presley</strong>&#8216;s<br />
>>>>>>>> birthday with his death day AND having no one to advise her on that<br />
>>>>>>>> falsehood AND then making a campaign theme on that for the day<br />
>>>>>>>> is one<br />
>>>>>>>> lousy move.  Like Sarah Palin, she has some odd contorted<br />
>>>>>>>> statements<br />
>>>>>>>> on the truth but unlike Palin, who is eventually proven right in<br />
>>>>>>>> her<br />
>>>>>>>> own way, Bachman is wrong, (e.g., Guardisil can cause paralysis,<br />
>>>>>>>> Obama&#8217;s trip to India cost $100 million.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>> I don&#8217;t care about the gaffes.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> The point is: they are not  &#8220;gaffes&#8221;; they are acts of stupidity.<br />
>>>>>> Obama also does not generally commit gaffes but statements of<br />
>>>>>> outright<br />
>>>>>> stupidty &#8212; like the &#8220;corpse men&#8221; for &#8220;corpsmen&#8221; or &#8220;I do not have<br />
>>>>>> all<br />
>>>>>> the facts . . . but let me call the Cambridge police stupid . . &#8221;<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> Yes.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>> I care about another candidate running<br />
>>>>>>> for President without executive experience on a platform of<br />
>>>>>>> lightbulbs<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> <strong>Unlike Romney</strong>, Bachman is always right on the economic issues,.  The<br />
>>>>>> lightbulb issue is over fascism (see below).  Of all, except perhaps<br />
>>>>>> Paul and Cain, Bachman is the strongest against fascism.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> You have a very all-encompassing definition of &#8220;fascism&#8221;. By your<br />
>>>>> definition, the economist <strong>Milton Friedman</strong>, generally considered to<br />
>>>>> be a<br />
>>>>> libertarian to some degree, would be a fascist, since he acknowledged<br />
>>>>> that one of the legitimate roles of government was to regulate in<br />
>>>>> those<br />
>>>>> areas where free market forces did not, AND where the damage from<br />
>>>>> failure to regulate would be detrimental to the nation as a whole.<br />
>>><br />
>>>> Regulation presumably to prevent someone from doing what he otherwise<br />
>>>> would do &#8212; say defraud and injure &#8212; is not fascist coercion.<br />
>>>> Fascist coercion is a socialist command economy in which people are<br />
>>>> commanded and directed to do things they otherwise would not do.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Agreed. However, the argument falls apart due to the fact that the<br />
>>> policy is incurred democratically<br />
>><br />
>> No. Slavery ought not to be imposed &#8220;democratically&#8221;.<br />
><br />
> Yet it can be. Again, you&#8217;re speaking in terms of ideals rather than<br />
> practical reality.<br />
><br />
> I do not believe<br />
>> there is really such a thing as &#8220;democratic socialism&#8221;, just socialism<br />
>> with a sham political <strong>system</strong> that never really can get rid of<br />
>> socialism. The U.K. &#8220;conservative&#8221; party was never able, or even tried<br />
>> to get rid of the NHS, for example.   The voting part of the whole<br />
>> thing just means a large number of people wish slavery.<br />
><br />
> Yes. And that is their perogative.<br />
>><br />
>>>   and can be changed democratically.<br />
>>> Ergo, the people are *NOT* being forced to do things they would<br />
>>> otherwise not do; they implicitly agreed to this by electing the<br />
>>> politicians who would implement such measures.<br />
>>><br />
>><br />
>> Yes, people *are* being coerced into doing things they would otherwise<br />
>> not do by the agency of some votes over other votes. You appear to<br />
>> have little understanding of what it is to be &#8220;<strong>social</strong> libertarian&#8221;<br />
>> that you claim to be. What does than mean to you?  You like to smoke<br />
>> pot?<br />
><br />
> You&#8217;re conflating two different principles. They are indeed nuanced, but<br />
> they are yet different.<br />
><br />
> One can hold whatever ideals one wishes.  Conceptually, the ideals I<br />
> hold are not, in essence, different than yours. Where we seem to differ<br />
> is how we react to the ideals that OTHER PEOPLE HOLD, and the fact that<br />
> their ideals **MAY**, in a democratic society, be imposed on us from<br />
> time to time; and also that their are some &#8220;wrongs&#8221; that are worse than<br />
> others. Some can be tolerated when they are imposed on us, others should<br />
> not be. Each decides FOR THEMSELVES. Liberty in practice, not a theory.<br />
><br />
> Take right-to-work laws, for example, an question on which all the<br />
> candidates were asked the other night, and which they all dodged. TO ME,<br />
> closed shop laws in a state are one of the more heinous abrigements of<br />
> human rights I can think of. The notion that a skilled and qualified<br />
> individual may NOT get a particular job UNLESS he or she consents to<br />
> joining a trade cooperative disgusts me. So, a long time ago, I decided<br />
> that I would never live in a state that has those laws &#8212; I decline to<br />
> support them directly with my taxes.<br />
><br />
> That is all the choice I need. I may wish to live in Wisconsin, for<br />
> example &#8212; very pretty state &#8212; but as long as they have that nonsense<br />
> on their books, I will choose not to.<br />
><br />
> That&#8217;s liberty in practice, not a theory.<br />
><br />
> Now, let&#8217;s contrast that with squiggly light bulbs. It is indeed heinous<br />
> and rather disgusting that government would step in and mandate the end<br />
> of a useful and inexpensive technology. But, when you peel back the<br />
> covers and look for the <strong>REASONING</strong> behind it, the reasoning is quite<br />
> compelling. Markedly lower energy consumption in an age where energy is<br />
> becoming a premium, AND a positive return on investment for the consumer<br />
> due to the longevity of the bulbs.<br />
><br />
> In short, a trivial incursion into the ideals of liberty with a solid<br />
> payback in terms of <strong>social</strong> value and hard dollars. Thus, it&#8217;s not the<br />
> place I wish to dig my foxhole and fight to the death. I&#8217;ll leave that<br />
> fight to the ideologues, retreat, and find a more important battle line<br />
> to defend.<br />
><br />
> Same concept applies to vaccination, talking here about standard<br />
> vaccines, not Guardasil. Your kids have to have them to go to public<br />
> school, or they don&#8217;t get in the door. There is good public health<br />
> reasoning behind the requirement. You may choose not to comply<br />
> (liberty), but you must also comply with the law that states that the<br />
> child must stay in school until his 16th-17th birthday, depending on the<br />
> state. Pretty heinous, when you look at the cost of private education<br />
> and even the purchase of home school curricula, and there&#8217;s no school<br />
> tax rebate to cover it. Yet, those laws have virtually wiped out the<br />
> &#8220;childhood diseases&#8221; of fifty years ago.<br />
><br />
> An incursion into the principles of liberty? Absolutely. Good or bad for<br />
> society? Sorry, good.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>> There is a grey area in all this, but not in Mass. Mass. both supported<br />
>>> and supports the health care legislation that they have.<br />
>><br />
>> The only gray area would be what rights do the people of any one state<br />
>> have to impose restrictions on the rights of their ciizens as U.S.<br />
>> citizens.  No state can re-institute slavery or state-sponsored<br />
>> segregation, for example, or abridge freedom of speech.If the U.S.<br />
>> Supreme Court does throw out the mandate for Obamacare it is<br />
>> conceivable that the same principle could be used to throw it out in<br />
>> Mass. although that is unlikely because the 14th Amendment-<br />
>> Incorporation Doctrine has thus far only applied to the Bill of Rights<br />
>> and not U.S. court precedent, per se.<br />
><br />
> Yes.<br />
>><br />
>> THe grey area<br />
>>> is when politicians ram though or continue to implement legislation or<br />
>>> policies that they KNOW to be UNsupported by the people. In that<br />
>>> situation, you can make kind of a &#8220;creaky&#8221; case that it is &#8220;fascism&#8221;,<br />
>>> but its not a very strong case.<br />
>>><br />
>>> From<br />
>>><br />
>>>> a libertarian POV that would be to initiate force to cause action<br />
>>>> rather than retaliate against a force after action. Mandated<br />
>>>> healthcare is as surely fascist as herding people into boxcars off to<br />
>>>> labor camps. It is not the same in degree as coercive taxation to<br />
>>>> redistribute for healthcare in that even if there is coercion from the<br />
>>>> taxpayer toward charity there is not coercion for any recipent to<br />
>>>> accept.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Hyperbole.<br />
>><br />
>> What is there for me to believe you have any attachment to<br />
>> libertarianism as you claim?<br />
><br />
> What do I care what you believe? In your mind, once somebody uses that<br />
> term, there is a checklist of hard and fast rules that they MUST adhere<br />
> to with NO compromise, or (I suppose) they get kicked out of the &#8220;club&#8221;.<br />
> Whatever. I&#8217;m a pragmatist. I can hold to a set of ideals understanding<br />
> that they *must* be compromised in order to live in a society.<br />
> Apparently you cannot. That&#8217;s fine &#8212;- my &#8220;libertarianism&#8221; requires me<br />
> to accept you as you are, as long as your views don&#8217;t infringe on mine.<br />
> However, your hard-and-fast insistence of what MY views MUST be in order<br />
> to use the (l) word leads me to think that you are channeling an more<br />
> than a little &#8220;inner totalitarian&#8221;. Part of loving liberty is allowing<br />
> people the dignity to decide what sort of views they themselves hold.<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>>>> You&#8217;ll excuse me if I prefer the traditional definition to yours.<br />
>>><br />
>>>> My definition is from Mussolini and Gentile. On whether there is or is<br />
>>>> not one-man <strong>rule</strong> is irrelevant to the meaning of fascism in a<br />
>>>> political economy. It is socialism in which private property and<br />
>>>> enterprise exists but commanded to perfom a <strong>social</strong> function by a<br />
>>>> central authority.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Not one man, but one PARTY. And, you still have the inconvenient fact<br />
>>> that you can vote the beggars out.<br />
>><br />
>> Voting Brown out and Cameron in in the U.K. did not <strong>change</strong> anything<br />
>> except for the level of competence.<br />
><br />
> That&#8217;s a problem with the political <strong>system</strong> over there, not the<br />
> principle. We have a bit of that problem here, as well, where if the<br />
> terms conservative/liberal/libertarian/communism/fascism were all<br />
> defined on a global scale, there wouldn&#8217;t be too much difference between<br />
> Obama and Bush; both would fall in the left-of-center zone leaning<br />
> authoritarian (if you&#8217;re familiar with the political compass website or<br />
> Jerry Pournelle&#8217;s theories on this, for example.)<br />
>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>>>> Fascism requires as a necessary element a dictatorship and single<br />
>>>>> party<br />
>>>>> <strong>rule</strong> which subjects the economy *and society* to a very high degree of<br />
>>>>> centralized regimentation.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> Lightbulbs don&#8217;t qualify.<br />
>>><br />
>>>> An economy in which certain light-bulbs of certain demonstrated safety<br />
>>>> and long history of effectiveness are commanded by political authority<br />
>>>> to cease to be and light bulbs of certain demonstrated hazard and<br />
>>>> little history of effectiveness are commanded to be is a fascist<br />
>>>> economy if the means of production and sale are left in the private<br />
>>>> sector or communist-socialist if production and sale is through the<br />
>>>> government.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Yet, <strong>Milton Friedman</strong> would have pointed out that this is a potential<br />
>>> case for &#8220;neighborhood effects&#8221;, assuming it is agreed that it would be<br />
>>> better for the environment if the <strong>US</strong> had fewer coal fired plants and<br />
>>> better for national security if we less imported oil. Moving to squiggly<br />
>>> bulbs in total would allow us to shutter a couple dozen of those coal<br />
>>> fired plants and increase energy independence.<br />
>>><br />
>><br />
>> Hyperbole, at best.  Hoax and sham. likely.  There is no such thing as<br />
>> man-made global warming.<br />
><br />
> There may not be; the same view of science that insists that the jury is<br />
> still out on this entire matter (which it is) leaves open the<br />
> possibility that some element of GW MAY BE man-made. Lots of research<br />
> still to be done. So, I resist large scale political investments in<br />
> &#8220;green&#8221; until the science is complete. However, I have no quarrel with<br />
> little investments. If nothing else, the squgglies extend the lifespan<br />
> of the <strong>US</strong> coal reserves.<br />
>><br />
>> If you give me that &#8220;consensus of scientists&#8221; nonsense, this<br />
>> discussion is over until you acquaint yourself with climategate.<br />
><br />
> I reject the &#8220;consensus of scientists&#8221; argument because the scientific<br />
> method has been clearly compromised in this case. However, I hold open<br />
> the possibility that, in the end, the supposed consensus view still may<br />
> be shown to be correct.<br />
>><br />
>> And since when has a personal belief in a particular scientific theory<br />
>> been a means test to hold public office?  Since the progressive left<br />
>> turned science (beliefs are made to conform to facts) into a religion<br />
>> (facts are made to conform to beliefs).<br />
><br />
> There was an article written a few weeks ago about the nonscientific<br />
> stuff the LEFT holds to as part of their &#8220;portfolio of beliefs&#8221; &#8212; the<br />
> one I remember is the resistance to <strong>GMO</strong> foods. <strong>GMO</strong> foods have the<br />
> potential to solve world hunger on a massive scale &#8212; except for the<br />
> fact that the same liberals that WORRY about global hunger resist <strong>GMO</strong><br />
> foods because it MIGHT become a danger, even though study after study<br />
> has sown that their concerns are without basis.<br />
>><br />
>> The same reasoning that coerces a certain kind of lightbulb is the<br />
>> same reasoning that can coerce you to stop breathing &#8212; CO2.<br />
>><br />
>>>   From my perspective, you are refusing to compromise even a single<br />
>>> ideological iota to reach a positive goal. That dog don&#8217;t hunt.<br />
>>><br />
>><br />
>> Yes, coercion (force to make an individual do as he otherwise would<br />
>> not do) is a moral evil whether it is done by another individual or a<br />
>> government, always. That has been an implicit part of American life<br />
>> since the Founding. Take away coercion in taxation; slavery and<br />
>> legislation of religious intolerance in some states &#8212; now forcibly<br />
>> forbidden &#8212; how has America not run on that principle in the past?<br />
><br />
> I have no idea what you&#8217;re getting at in that paragraph. Coercion is<br />
> evil, but in a diverse society, don&#8217;t sweat the small stuff. Pick your<br />
> fights wisely. Remember that the slippery slope argument is, and always<br />
> will be, fallacious intellectual reasoning.<br />
><br />
>> .<br />
>>><br />
>>>> Slavery is specifically an un-constitutional right and socialism,<br />
>>>> fascism or any command economy is slavery (Hayek, Road to Serfdom).<br />
>>><br />
>>> Then we&#8217;re all doomed to be slaves, to some extent.</p>
<p>The constitution amendments are there to stop it from going back to<br />
outright open ownership.</p>
<p>Unless you vote in people that will <strong>change</strong> it back.</p>
<p></khadijahbintmuham></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/09/28/how-about-a-rick-perrymarco-rubio-ticket-for-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Same Old Shit</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/09/26/same-old-shit/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/09/26/same-old-shit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=23432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 9/9/2011 7:27 AM, Lifsabsurd wrote: > > All Democrats belong in hell. Democrats are never happy and never get to their Socialist Utopia here on earth&#8230;. So they&#8217;re already in hell. stuck in a life where they can never possibly achieve their goal of a Socialist Utopia. Forever unhappy&#8230;. watching others find economic ans [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 9/9/2011 7:27 AM, Lifsabsurd wrote:</p>
<p>><br />
> All <strong>Democrats</strong> belong in hell.</p>
<p><strong>Democrats</strong> are never happy and never get to their Socialist Utopia here<br />
on earth&#8230;.    So they&#8217;re already in hell.</p>
<p>stuck in a life where they can never possibly achieve their goal of a<br />
Socialist Utopia.   Forever unhappy&#8230;. watching others find economic<br />
ans <strong>social</strong> happiness while they are destined for failure and discontent<br />
with their lives of unfulfilled Socialism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/09/26/same-old-shit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If tax breaks help the rich to create jobs&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/09/22/if-tax-breaks-help-the-rich-to-create-jobs/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/09/22/if-tax-breaks-help-the-rich-to-create-jobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 05:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buster Norris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uno Hu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=23424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 9/22/2011 1:25 AM, Uno Hu wrote: > &#8220;Buster Norris wrote in message: > news:oa6l77luvpsle6f6tma0domnovna7trg1u @&#038;*$?%4ax.com > > &#8220;If tax breaks help the rich to create jobs&#8230;&#8221; > > We&#8217;d all be enjoying a thiving economy&#8230;we know. > But we aren&#8217;t.. because that is pack of lies. > > Rich neocons should be forced to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 9/22/2011 1:25 AM, <strong>Uno Hu</strong> wrote:<br />
> &#8220;<strong>Buster Norris</strong> wrote in message:<br />
> news:oa6l77luvpsle6f6tma0domnovna7trg1u<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>4ax.com<br />
><br />
> &#8220;If tax breaks help the rich to create jobs&#8230;&#8221;<br />
><br />
> We&#8217;d all be enjoying a thiving economy&#8230;we know.<br />
> But we aren&#8217;t.. because that is pack of lies.<br />
><br />
> Rich neocons should be forced to pay their <strong>taxes</strong> like everybody else<br />
> does.</p>
<p>If <strong>taxes</strong> solved the <strong>social</strong> ills, we&#8217;d be living in Utopia&#8230;..</p>
<p>Poor people should be expected to get off their couch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/09/22/if-tax-breaks-help-the-rich-to-create-jobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Railroad Spike has been Driven into the Coffin Lid of the DOOMED Hate-Agendas of the RRR &amp; LDS Cults!</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/09/08/another-railroad-spike-has-been-driven-into-the-coffin-lid-of-the-doomed-hate-agendas-of-the-rrr-lds-cults-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/09/08/another-railroad-spike-has-been-driven-into-the-coffin-lid-of-the-doomed-hate-agendas-of-the-rrr-lds-cults-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 16:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMERICANS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOOMED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Down Grade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle-East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Mon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Tue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PARTY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PDT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RRR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=23342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 9/6/2011 3:30 PM, TRMatt wrote: > On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 08:36:31 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty > wrote: > >> >>> On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 22:56:16 -0700 (PDT), T&#038;*$?%y >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sep 5, 9:55 am, TRMatt wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I find it strange that the a Tea Party Presidential [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 9/6/2011 3:30 PM, TRMatt wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Tue</strong>, 06 Sep 2011 08:36:31 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty<br />
>
<then -Destroy-Everything<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>><br />
>>> <strong>On Mon</strong>, 5 Sep 2011 22:56:16 -0700 (<strong>PDT</strong>), <acronym title="Tim Crowley"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> T&*$?%y</span></acronym><br />
>>> <timmyturmoil @gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>> On Sep 5, 9:55 am, TRMatt<br />
<trdell1 ...@gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>>     I find it strange that the a Tea Party Presidential candidate is<br />
>>>>> so anti-<strong>Constitution</strong>.   I<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Really?   The whole teabagger party is nothing but traitorous scum.<br />
>>>> They hate the <strong>Constitution</strong>.  In point of fact &#8211; like the terrorists in<br />
>>>> the <strong>middle east</strong> &#8211; they hate us because we are free.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> Yep you look free, the <strong>IRS</strong> has you on a tight leash and Obama is forcing<br />
>> you to buy <strong>insurance</strong> and what ever else he wants to force you to buy.<br />
><br />
>   My <strong>taxes</strong> have changed little since Obama came to office.  He even<br />
> extended the Bush Tax breaks saves me about 3 grand a year.<br />
><br />
>  My Insurance is the same also.  Is he trying to force me to buy<br />
> something else?  WHAT?<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> Why don&#8217;t you read the constitution to see if <strong>TEA</strong> <strong>PARTY</strong> persons are<br />
>> suggesting we follow it&#8230;..  Obama and the rest of you Socialists are<br />
>> ignoring the <strong>Constitution</strong> which &#8220;is&#8221; treasonous.<br />
><br />
>    See right here you show your lack of understanding of the<br />
> <strong>Constitution</strong> and why the Tea Party is so dangerous to real Americans.<br />
> If you had your way we could only have a opinion approved by the Tea<br />
> Party.  Germany was like that at one time.<br />
><br />
> <strong>AMERICANS</strong> have the right to have opinions that differ from the<br />
> government and to criticize the government and the <strong>TEA</strong> <strong>PARTY</strong>!!!!<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> Obama is the Prince of the <strong>Muslim</strong> Brotherhood and the <strong>Muslim</strong> Brotherhood<br />
>> are REAL <strong>TERRORISTS</strong>.<br />
><br />
>     OK and the Tea Party is much like Hamas give it our way or else.<br />
> Saw that in the Debt bill and it caused the downgrade.  Stop listening<br />
> to that fool Beck.</p>
<p>That would be akin to blaming Obama for the earthquake in D.C&#8230;. it has<br />
been coming for many many years.</p>
<p>The Tea Party didn&#8217;t exist when the Down-Grade began&#8230;..  this was all<br />
coming and has been coming for 50 years of deficit <strong>social</strong> program waste<br />
that <strong>CONGRESS</strong> could have stopped and didn&#8217;t.    We have no choice but to<br />
have a military and use it.  We have a choice as to whether we give away<br />
free <strong>money</strong> to anyone that can sneak across our borders.</p>
</trdell1></timmyturmoil></then>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/09/08/another-railroad-spike-has-been-driven-into-the-coffin-lid-of-the-doomed-hate-agendas-of-the-rrr-lds-cults-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama will be giving a speech</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/09/06/obama-will-be-giving-a-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/09/06/obama-will-be-giving-a-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GREEN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prostitutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smugglers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=23320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have written and added to and rewritten this several times since the late Bush and early Obama Regimes created and made worse our economic problems. I heard Obama will be giving a speech that would call for less &#8220;regulation&#8221; and tax incentives and stability&#8230; Interestingly this is Obama paying lip service to the ideas [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have written and added to and rewritten this several times since the<br />
late Bush and early Obama Regimes created and made worse our economic<br />
problems.</p>
<p>I heard Obama will be giving a speech that would call for less<br />
&#8220;regulation&#8221; and tax incentives and stability&#8230;</p>
<p>Interestingly this is Obama paying lip service to the ideas that he has<br />
been against and been doing the opposite of, over the past three years.</p>
<p>+&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;+<br />
Reducing <strong>regulations</strong> is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more <strong>regulations</strong>, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
<strong>regulations</strong> are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression.</p>
<p>End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
<strong>prostitutes</strong> when there are so many legal tax paying <strong>prostitutes</strong> out there?</p>
<p><a href="http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs--crime-usage-falls" >http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs&#8211;crime-usage-falls</a></p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the <strong>USA</strong> and Original Green<br />
money outside the <strong>USA</strong>&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly sending red money home to <strong>Mexico</strong> would be useless as the <strong>RED</strong><br />
money would be useless in <strong>Mexico</strong> since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad. All electronic money leaving the <strong>USA</strong> would be debited the<br />
Sales tax when the money is sent/spent.</p>
<p>The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drug smuggling less*<br />
*profitable* as would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL<br />
“<strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ITEM</strong>” SALES <strong>TAX</strong> *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A <strong>VAT</strong> <strong>TAX</strong> WHICH WILL HELP THE<br />
<strong>DRUG</strong> DEALERS and illegals by making their tax free money leaving the<br />
country even more valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the <strong>RED</strong> money<br />
for <strong>GREEN</strong> money then you would charge the sales tax at that point.</p>
<p>Have the States Ratify an <strong>amendment</strong> withdrawing the 16th <strong>amendment</strong>&#8230;<br />
Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (<strong>Federal</strong> sales<br />
tax) *BUT NOT A <strong>VAT</strong> or VALUE ADDED <strong>TAX</strong>* with the same <strong>amendment</strong> that<br />
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a <strong>Federal</strong> *<strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ITEM</strong>* sales tax.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
*<strong>GREEN</strong>* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add to<br />
the <strong>amendment</strong> that if congress raises tax by 1% they are forced to cut<br />
every single expenditure of the government by 3%.</p>
<p>Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
of our military bases along the southern <strong>Border</strong> to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the <strong>Border</strong> patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
<strong>Federal</strong> trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases.</p>
<p>This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
outside the <strong>USA</strong>. That will make it harder for <strong>smugglers</strong> to get money out<br />
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch <strong>smugglers</strong>. We<br />
are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
borrow like income tax does.</p>
<p>This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less <strong>welfare</strong> and charge them<br />
tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>Pass an <strong>amendment</strong> to the constitution that makes all<br />
*laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.</p>
<p>There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. And a<br />
constitutional <strong>amendment</strong> to limit the Interstate Commerce Clause. The<br />
politicians use that clause to justify all sorts of socialist <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>. The<br />
founding fathers never meant for it to be so broadly applied. Limit it<br />
with an <strong>amendment</strong>, so government can&#8217;t justify every crazy idea by<br />
saying its legal under the interstate commerce clause.</p>
<p>Pass another <strong>amendment</strong> creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP <strong>CONGRESS</strong> FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING <strong>MONEY</strong>.</p>
<p>To quit filling the jails with people over *<strong>social</strong> taboos* , we<br />
need to take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;<strong>social</strong> engineer&#8221; businesses or<br />
private people by removing the governments use of tax code to manipulate<br />
people.</p>
<p>Government needs to spend <strong>10</strong>% less every year until they meet the<br />
income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
force an across the board spending freeze and then across the board cuts<br />
on the government spending, to do that we have to include a law in our<br />
<strong>TAX</strong> <strong>amendment</strong> to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
federal sales tax increase would result in automatic spending cuts using<br />
a baseline of <strong>10</strong>% taxes.</p>
<p>And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
them fight their own fights. We also need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
committing, we need fewer police and prisons to support&#8230;. the above<br />
drug and tax plan, will reduce police and prison needs by at least that<br />
<strong>10</strong>% that this plan suggested cutting each year.</p>
<p>NO <strong>welfare</strong> to corporations, and cut <strong>welfare</strong> to private people by <strong>10</strong>%<br />
each year until it is <strong>10</strong>% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
in DEEP for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/09/06/obama-will-be-giving-a-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kill All The Old People And Whiney, Politically Correct Rightists Who Refuse To Take Up Arms Against The Niggers, Muslims, Jews And Other Wogs Because They&#8217;re Unproductive Cowards</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/08/11/kill-all-the-old-people-and-whiney-politically-correct-rightists-who-refuse-to-take-up-arms-against-the-niggers-muslims-jews-and-other-wogs-because-theyre-unproductive-cowards/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/08/11/kill-all-the-old-people-and-whiney-politically-correct-rightists-who-refuse-to-take-up-arms-against-the-niggers-muslims-jews-and-other-wogs-because-theyre-unproductive-cowards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nordic Aryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politically Correct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=23114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 8/11/2011 8:01 AM, Speaks To Christ wrote: > Tom P wrote >> On 8/10/2011 10:12 PM, Rich wrote: >>> [quoted text muted] >>> that the financial crisis is spreading to bigger economies. >>> >>> Japan&#8216;s Nikkei 225 index fell 1.8%, South Korea&#8216;s Kospi shed 2%, and >>> Australia&#8216;s ASX lost 1%. >> >> >> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 8/<strong>11</strong>/2011 8:01 AM, Speaks To Christ wrote:<br />
> Tom P wrote<br />
>> On 8/<strong>10</strong>/2011 <strong>10</strong>:12 PM, Rich wrote:<br />
>>> [quoted <strong>text</strong> muted]<br />
>>> that the financial crisis is spreading to bigger economies.<br />
>>><br />
>>> <strong>Japan</strong>&#8216;s Nikkei 225 index fell 1.8%, South <strong>Korea</strong>&#8216;s Kospi shed 2%, and<br />
>>> <strong>Australia</strong>&#8216;s <strong>ASX</strong> lost 1%.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> This is the end result of the &#8216;globalization&#8217; experiment. It has been an<br />
>> absolute failure!<br />
>><br />
>><br />
><br />
> We should ban all international trade, ban unions, bring back child labor, ban the<br />
> <strong>social</strong> safety net, and return to the gold standard.   That way things will be like<br />
> the good old days in the 19th century before globalization.</p>
<p>NOT a bad idea.</p>
<p>> Then we&#8217;ll kill all the old people and whiney, politically correct rightists who<br />
> refuse to take up arms against the niggers, muslims, jews and other wogs because<br />
> they&#8217;re unproductive cowards who belong in labor camps producing goods for the war<br />
> effort.   The unproductive loudmouths on rightist radio will be the first to go.</p>
<p>Once you banned the welfare and unions, killing people would be<br />
excessive&#8230;.   and your racism is funny since the Nordic/Aryan types<br />
are big on Socialism and are lazy worthless government sucking<br />
Socialists every bit as much as any others.</p>
<p>But keep talking because your exposing just how big the racism of the<br />
Socialists is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/08/11/kill-all-the-old-people-and-whiney-politically-correct-rightists-who-refuse-to-take-up-arms-against-the-niggers-muslims-jews-and-other-wogs-because-theyre-unproductive-cowards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solfed&#8217;s Response to the London Riots</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/08/10/solfeds-response-to-the-london-riots/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/08/10/solfeds-response-to-the-london-riots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Clore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Private]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=23003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 8/10/2011 4:53 AM, Frisbieinstein wrote: > On Aug 9, 9:59 pm, Dan Clore wrote: >> > > > It may be in bad taste to brag, but a month ago I predicted riots. > There will be more. Taxes will go up, riots will increase, and the > people will be taxed more heavily [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 8/<strong>10</strong>/2011 4:53 AM, Frisbieinstein wrote:<br />
> On Aug 9, 9:59 pm, <strong>Dan Clore</strong> <cl ...@columbia-center.org> wrote:<br />
>><br />
><br />
><br />
> It may be in bad taste to brag, but a month ago I predicted riots.<br />
> There will be more.  Taxes will go up, riots will increase, and the<br />
> people will be taxed more heavily to pay for law enforcement.  This<br />
> spiral will continue until they finally give up and resort to <strong>social</strong><br />
> justice.  I do not think this will be soon though.</p>
<p>This is leading up to Obama&#8217;s Private citizen security force.</p>
<p>Obama explained that it will have funding as great as our military.<br />
It will be a Marxist &#8220;community organizers&#8221; dream come true.</p>
<p>The Obama security force will &#8220;control&#8221; the people.  Much like the Brown<br />
shirts and the <strong>SS</strong> controlled the German people.</p>
<p></cl></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/08/10/solfeds-response-to-the-london-riots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LOOKS LIKE THIS PLAN WAS CORRECT</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/08/06/looks-like-this-plan-was-correct/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/08/06/looks-like-this-plan-was-correct/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 21:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CORRECT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GREEN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LOOKS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prostitutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smugglers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=22865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*LOOKS LIKE THIS PLAN WAS CORRECT * And gives America back to Americans Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and competition would help us get out of this depression. End the &#8220;war [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*<strong>LOOKS</strong> LIKE THIS PLAN WAS <strong>CORRECT</strong> *<br />
And gives America back to Americans</p>
<p>Reducing <strong>regulations</strong> is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more <strong>regulations</strong>, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
<strong>regulations</strong> are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression.</p>
<p>End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
<strong>prostitutes</strong> when there are so many legal tax paying <strong>prostitutes</strong> out there?</p>
<p><a href="http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs--crime-usage-falls" >http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs&#8211;crime-usage-falls</a></p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the <strong>USA</strong> and Original Green<br />
money outside the <strong>USA</strong>&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the <strong>RED</strong><br />
money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad. All electronic money leaving the <strong>USA</strong> would be debited the<br />
Sales tax when the money is sent/spent.</p>
<p>The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drug smuggling less*<br />
*profitable* as would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL<br />
“<strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ITEM</strong>” SALES <strong>TAX</strong> *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A VAT <strong>TAX</strong> WHICH WILL HELP THE<br />
<strong>DRUG</strong> DEALERS and illegals by making their tax free money leaving the<br />
country even more valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the <strong>RED</strong> money<br />
for <strong>GREEN</strong> money then you would charge the sales tax at that point.</p>
<p>Have the States Ratify an <strong>amendment</strong> withdrawing the 16th <strong>amendment</strong>&#8230;<br />
Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (<strong>Federal</strong> sales<br />
tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED <strong>TAX</strong>* with the same <strong>amendment</strong> that<br />
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a <strong>Federal</strong> *<strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ITEM</strong>* sales tax.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
*<strong>GREEN</strong>* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add to<br />
the <strong>amendment</strong> that if congress raises tax by 1% they are forced to cut<br />
every single expenditure of the government by 3%.</p>
<p>Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
of our military bases along the southern <strong>Border</strong> to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the <strong>Border</strong> patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
<strong>Federal</strong> trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases.</p>
<p>This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
outside the <strong>USA</strong>. That will make it harder for <strong>smugglers</strong> to get money out<br />
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch <strong>smugglers</strong>. We<br />
are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
borrow like income tax does.</p>
<p>This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less <strong>welfare</strong> and charge them<br />
tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>Pass an <strong>amendment</strong> to the constitution that makes all<br />
*laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.</p>
<p>There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. And a<br />
constitutional <strong>amendment</strong> to limit the Interstate Commerce Clause. The<br />
politicians use that clause to justify all sorts of socialist <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>. The<br />
founding fathers never meant for it to be so broadly applied. Limit it<br />
with an <strong>amendment</strong>, so government can&#8217;t justify every crazy idea by<br />
saying its legal under the interstate commerce clause.</p>
<p>Pass another <strong>amendment</strong> creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP <strong>CONGRESS</strong> FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING <strong>MONEY</strong>.</p>
<p>To quit filling the jails with people over *<strong>social</strong> taboos* , we<br />
need to take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;<strong>social</strong> engineer&#8221; businesses or<br />
private people by removing the governments use of tax code to manipulate<br />
people.</p>
<p>Government needs to spend <strong>10</strong>% less every year until they meet the<br />
income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
force an across the board spending freeze and then across the board cuts<br />
on the government spending, to do that we have to include a law in our<br />
<strong>TAX</strong> <strong>amendment</strong> to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
federal sales tax increase would result in automatic spending cuts using<br />
a baseline of <strong>10</strong>% taxes.</p>
<p>And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
them fight their own fights. We also need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
committing, we need fewer police and prisons to support&#8230;. the above<br />
drug and tax plan, will reduce police and prison needs by at least that<br />
<strong>10</strong>% that this plan suggested cutting each year.</p>
<p>NO <strong>welfare</strong> to corporations, and cut <strong>welfare</strong> to private people by <strong>10</strong>%<br />
each year until it is <strong>10</strong>% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
in DEEP for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/08/06/looks-like-this-plan-was-correct/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How much warming does co2 really cause?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/08/04/how-much-warming-does-co2-really-cause/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/08/04/how-much-warming-does-co2-really-cause/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 16:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=22785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 8/4/2011 5:45 AM, Giga2 wrote: > &#8220;Unum&#8221; wrote in message > news:j1cknv$mn5$1 @&#038;*$?%dont-email.me&#8230; >>> >>> Its certainly exaggeration : ) but not much. If they add a few percent >>> carbon tax to everything it won&#8217;t affect most westerners too badly but if >>> you are already on the poverty line what then? And [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 8/4/2011 5:45 AM, Giga2 wrote:<br />
> &#8220;Unum&#8221; <noneof @yourbusiness.com> wrote in message<br />
> news:j1cknv$mn5$1<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>dont-email.me&#8230;<br />
>>><br />
>>> Its certainly exaggeration : ) but not much. If they add a few percent<br />
>>> carbon tax to everything it won&#8217;t affect most westerners too badly but if<br />
>>> you are already on the poverty line what then? And believe me what they<br />
>>> are<br />
>><br />
>> If you are already on the poverty line you aren&#8217;t likely to be using<br />
>> a lot of carbon anyways.<br />
><br />
> So if they are using as much or more than westerners proportionally would<br />
> you be against putting a price on carbon?<br />
><br />
>><br />
>>> gonna start the <strong>taxes</strong> off at is *just* the first step. I estimated they<br />
>>> would possibly need an 80% tax rate on carbon to really affect<br />
>>> consumption<br />
>>> to the degree *they* say they want to. That would kill millions, maybe<br />
>><br />
>> Nobody is suggesting anything that will kill millions or billions<br />
>> of people, you are talking through your <acronym title="ass"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> a&*$?%s</span></acronym>.<br />
><br />
> Well yeah doh! They don&#8217;t come out and say that but if that is the result<br />
> that can be forseen then anyone who just turns a blind eye to that is also<br />
> responsible in my opinion.<br />
><br />
>> Renewable energy sources<br />
>> and conservation would replace polluting fuels.<br />
>><br />
><br />
> I have no problem with that, lets do that.<br />
><br />
>>> billions of people and have ramifications that can hardly be guessed at<br />
>>> in<br />
>>> terms of <strong>social</strong> unrest, wars, clamp downs on freedoms etc etc. This is an<br />
>>> extreme outcome but plausible I would say. We have to be very very sure<br />
>>> it<br />
>>> is worth taking this path and the science isn&#8217;t there. So why are they so<br />
>>> sure? I don&#8217;t know. I often wonder!?<br />
>><br />
>> Maybe you just don&#8217;t know much about this. The science is definitely<br />
>> there, and the consequences of global warming are pretty clear.</p>
<p>And yet <strong>Global</strong> Warming is NOT so clear, you have the results and have<br />
yet to nail down the science that gets to that crisis&#8230;.</p>
<p>Sounds like fear mongering to me, you&#8217;re scaring the children and little<br />
old ladies.</p>
<p></noneof></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/08/04/how-much-warming-does-co2-really-cause/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Worst Outbreak of Libertaria In Norway Since WWII</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/26/worst-outbreak-of-libertaria-in-norway-since-wwii/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/26/worst-outbreak-of-libertaria-in-norway-since-wwii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harold Burton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NUT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=22577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 7/25/2011 9:49 PM, Harold Burton wrote: > In article > , > Nickname unavailable wrote: > >> Norway is tolerant/peaceful/ >> promotes progressive-liberal values/provides strong welfare support/ >> while maintaining a high level of quality of life must be . . . > > > . . . a figment of an idiot lefturd&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 7/25/2011 9:49 PM, Harold Burton wrote:<br />
> In article<br />
> <d9361e8f -73b9-4b0d-a40f-74ff72a04795<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>r18g2000vbs.googlegroups.com>,<br />
>  Nickname unavailable <video61 @tcq.net> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> Norway is tolerant/peaceful/<br />
>> promotes progressive-liberal values/provides strong welfare support/<br />
>> while maintaining a high level of quality of life must be . . .<br />
><br />
><br />
> . . . a figment of an idiot lefturd&#8217;s imagination.<br />
><br />
><br />
> snicker</p>
<p>Apparently one NUT fell through the cracks in their perfect Utopian<br />
Socialist network of social welfare and national health and mental<br />
health in Norway.</p>
<p>All they can say is oops?    If Utopia sucks that bad they might as well<br />
just have freedom instead.</p>
<p></video61></d9361e8f></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/26/worst-outbreak-of-libertaria-in-norway-since-wwii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A TEA PARTY BAIL OUT</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/21/a-tea-party-bail-out/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/21/a-tea-party-bail-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 02:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAIL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GREEN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PARTY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prostitutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smugglers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=22469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*A TEA PARTY BAIL OUT* give America back to Americans Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and competition would help us get out of this depression. End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*A TEA PARTY BAIL OUT*<br />
give America back to Americans</p>
<p>Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression.</p>
<p>End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
prostitutes when there are so many legal tax paying prostitutes out there?<br />
<a href="http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs--crime-usage-falls" >http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs&#8211;crime-usage-falls</a></p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED<br />
money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad. All electronic money leaving the USA would be debited the<br />
Sales tax when the money is sent/spent.</p>
<p>The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drug smuggling less*<br />
*profitable* as would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL<br />
“NEW ITEM” SALES TAX *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE<br />
DRUG DEALERS and illegals by making their tax free money leaving the<br />
country even more valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the RED money<br />
for GREEN money then you would charge the sales tax at that point.</p>
<p>Have the States Ratify an amendment withdrawing the 16th amendment&#8230;<br />
Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (Federal sales<br />
tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED TAX* with the same amendment that<br />
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a Federal *NEW ITEM* sales tax.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
*GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add to<br />
the amendment that if congress raises tax by 1% they are forced to cut<br />
every single expenditure of the government by 3%.</p>
<p>Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
of our military bases along the southern Border to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the Border patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
Federal trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases.</p>
<p>This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
outside the USA. That will make it harder for smugglers to get money out<br />
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch smugglers. We<br />
are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
borrow like income tax does.</p>
<p>This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less welfare and charge them<br />
tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>Pass an amendment to the constitution that makes all<br />
*laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.</p>
<p>There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. And a<br />
constitutional amendment to limit the Interstate Commerce Clause. The<br />
politicians use that clause to justify all sorts of socialist <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>. The<br />
founding fathers never meant for it to be so broadly applied. Limit it<br />
with an amendment, so government can&#8217;t justify every crazy idea by<br />
saying its legal under the interstate commerce clause.</p>
<p>Pass another amendment creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP CONGRESS FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING MONEY.</p>
<p>To quit filling the jails with people over *social taboos* , we<br />
need to take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;social engineer&#8221; businesses or<br />
private people by removing the governments use of tax code to manipulate<br />
people.</p>
<p>Government needs to spend 10% less every year until they meet the<br />
income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
force an across the board spending freeze and then across the board cuts<br />
on the government spending, to do that we have to include a law in our<br />
TAX amendment to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
federal sales tax increase would result in automatic spending cuts using<br />
a baseline of 10% taxes.</p>
<p>And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
them fight their own fights. We also need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
committing, we need fewer police and prisons to support&#8230;. the above<br />
drug and tax plan, will reduce police and prison needs by at least that<br />
10% that this plan suggested cutting each year.</p>
<p>NO welfare to corporations, and cut welfare to private people by 10%<br />
each year until it is 10% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
in DEEP for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/21/a-tea-party-bail-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An amendment that if congress raises tax by 1% they are forced to cut,every single expenditure of the government by 3%</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/13/an-amendment-that-if-congress-raises-tax-by-1-they-are-forced-to-cutevery-single-expenditure-of-the-government-by-3/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/13/an-amendment-that-if-congress-raises-tax-by-1-they-are-forced-to-cutevery-single-expenditure-of-the-government-by-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GREEN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prostitutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smugglers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=22359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*HOW TO ALLOW AMERICA TO SURVIVE* And give America back to Americans Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and competition would help us get out of this depression. End the &#8220;war on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*HOW TO ALLOW AMERICA TO SURVIVE*<br />
And give America back to Americans</p>
<p>Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression.</p>
<p>End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
prostitutes when there are so many legal tax paying prostitutes out there?</p>
<p><a href="http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs--crime-usage-falls" >http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs&#8211;crime-usage-falls</a></p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED<br />
money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad. All electronic money leaving the USA would be debited the<br />
Sales tax when the money is sent/spent.</p>
<p>The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drug smuggling less*<br />
*profitable* as would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL<br />
“NEW ITEM” SALES TAX *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE<br />
DRUG DEALERS and illegals by making their tax free money leaving the<br />
country even more valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the RED money<br />
for GREEN money then you would charge the sales tax at that point.</p>
<p>Have the States Ratify an amendment withdrawing the 16th amendment&#8230;<br />
Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (Federal sales<br />
tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED TAX* with the same amendment that<br />
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a Federal *NEW ITEM* sales tax.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
*GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add to<br />
the amendment that if congress raises tax by 1% they are forced to cut<br />
every single expenditure of the government by 3%.</p>
<p>Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
of our military bases along the southern Border to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the Border patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
Federal trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases.</p>
<p>This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
outside the USA. That will make it harder for smugglers to get money out<br />
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch smugglers. We<br />
are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
borrow like income tax does.</p>
<p>This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less welfare and charge them<br />
tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>Pass an amendment to the constitution that makes all<br />
*laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.</p>
<p>There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. And a<br />
constitutional amendment to limit the Interstate Commerce Clause. The<br />
politicians use that clause to justify all sorts of socialist <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>. The<br />
founding fathers never meant for it to be so broadly applied. Limit it<br />
with an amendment, so government can&#8217;t justify every crazy idea by<br />
saying its legal under the interstate commerce clause.</p>
<p>Pass another amendment creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP CONGRESS FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING MONEY.</p>
<p>To quit filling the jails with people over *social taboos* , we<br />
need to take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;social engineer&#8221; businesses or<br />
private people by removing the governments use of tax code to manipulate<br />
people.</p>
<p>Government needs to spend 10% less every year until they meet the<br />
income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
force an across the board spending freeze and then across the board cuts<br />
on the government spending, to do that we have to include a law in our<br />
TAX amendment to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
federal sales tax increase would result in automatic spending cuts using<br />
a baseline of 10% taxes.</p>
<p>And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
them fight their own fights. We also need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
committing, we need fewer police and prisons to support&#8230;. the above<br />
drug and tax plan, will reduce police and prison needs by at least that<br />
10% that this plan suggested cutting each year.</p>
<p>NO welfare to corporations, and cut welfare to private people by 10%<br />
each year until it is 10% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
in DEEP for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/13/an-amendment-that-if-congress-raises-tax-by-1-they-are-forced-to-cutevery-single-expenditure-of-the-government-by-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simplicity Economics v &#8220;Complexity&#8221; Economics</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/13/simplicity-economics-v-complexity-economics/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/13/simplicity-economics-v-complexity-economics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asian Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalist-Engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fabian Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HOLMES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[increased]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Published September]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sidney Webb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STEVEN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subprime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=22323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 7/12/2011 8:54 PM, Jonathan wrote: > &#8220;Bret Cahill&#8221; wrote in message > news:bee9f28c-436c-4624-8055-245e827c17e5 @&#038;*$?%g3g2000prf.googlegroups.com&#8230; >> Simplicity economics is simple. >> >> Just ask any complexity economist if &#8220;free speech on economic issue is >> a precondition of each and every free trade&#8221; and if you don&#8217;t hear a >> simple monosyllabic answer in 0.05 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 7/12/2011 8:54 PM, Jonathan wrote:<br />
> &#8220;Bret Cahill&#8221; <bret_e_cahill @yahoo.com> wrote in message<br />
> news:bee9f28c-436c-4624-8055-245e827c17e5<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>g3g2000prf.googlegroups.com&#8230;<br />
>> Simplicity economics is simple.<br />
>><br />
>> Just ask any complexity economist if &#8220;free speech on economic issue is<br />
>> a precondition of each and every free trade&#8221; and if you don&#8217;t hear a<br />
>> simple monosyllabic answer in 0.05 seconds you&#8217;ve exposed the<br />
>> &#8220;complexity&#8221; economist as an out right charlatan.<br />
><br />
><br />
> Well, then the famous London School of Economics, one<br />
> of the most selective universities in the world, must<br />
> be a bunch of dummies too.</p>
<p>["""[The London School of Economics and Political Science (informally<br />
the London School of Economics or LSE) is a public research university<br />
specialised in the social sciences located in London, United Kingdom and<br />
a constituent college of the federal University of London. Founded in<br />
1895 by Fabian Society members Sidney Webb, Beatrice Webb and George<br />
Bernard Shaw,[4] LSE joined the University of London in 1900 and degrees<br />
were issued to its students from 1902 onwards. Despite its name LSE<br />
conducts teaching and research across the entire range of the social<br />
sciences, including accounting and finance, anthropology, economics,<br />
geography, history, international relations, law, media and<br />
communications, philosophy, politics, psychology, social policy and<br />
sociology.]&#8221;"&#8221;]</p>
<p>LSE is a Fabian Socialist college started during the last great<br />
Progressive uprising.  They are Socialist HACKS that pretent to have a<br />
clue about economics and if anything they are dedicated to destroying<br />
the American Capitalist system.</p>
<p>><br />
> LSE Complexity research programme<br />
> <a href="http://www.psych.lse.ac.uk/complexity/lexicon.html" >http://www.psych.lse.ac.uk/complexity/lexicon.html</a><br />
></p>
<p>Oxford and Cambridge are NOT any better.  So you need yo look for<br />
successful economists, ones that print their finding before they happen<br />
and actually come true.</p>
<p>><br />
> And these guys from Oxford and Cambridge too?<br />
> <a href="http://www.see.leeds.ac.uk/research/sri/projects/esrc-research-seminars/Complexity%20Economics%20for%20Sustainability_report_December_10.pdf" >http://www.see.leeds.ac.uk/research/sri/projects/esrc-research-seminars/Complexity%20Economics%20for%20Sustainability_report_December_10.pdf</a></p>
<p>*NOTICE THE DATE*</p>
<p>This guy saw what was coming and put it on paper before the 2007 crash<br />
of Fannie and Freddie&#8230;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll bet this guy has NEVER even visited the three colleges you named.</p>
<p>["""[<br />
Fannie Mae Eases Credit To Aid Mortgage Lending<br />
By STEVEN A. HOLMES<br />
Published: *September* 30, 1999</p>
<p>In a move that could help increase home ownership rates among minorities<br />
and low-income consumers, the Fannie Mae Corporation is easing the<br />
credit requirements on loans that it will purchase from banks and other<br />
lenders.<br />
The action, which will begin as a pilot program involving 24 banks in 15<br />
markets -- including the New York metropolitan region -- will encourage<br />
those banks to extend home <a href='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/mortgages/' rel='tag' class="hashtag">#mortgages</a>  to individuals whose credit is<br />
generally not good enough to qualify for conventional loans. Fannie Mae<br />
officials say they hope to make it a nationwide program by next spring.<br />
Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has been<br />
under increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration to expand<br />
mortgage loans among low and moderate income people and felt pressure<br />
from stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in profits.<br />
In addition, banks, thrift institutions and mortgage companies have been<br />
pressing <a href='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/fannie/' rel='tag' class="hashtag">#Fannie</a> Mae  to help them make more loans to so-called subprime<br />
borrowers. These borrowers whose incomes, credit ratings and savings are<br />
not good enough to qualify for conventional loans, can only get loans<br />
from finance companies that charge much higher interest rates --<br />
anywhere from three to four percentage points higher than conventional<br />
loans.<br />
''Fannie Mae has expanded home ownership for millions of families in the<br />
1990's by reducing down payment requirements,'' said Franklin D. Raines,<br />
Fannie Mae's chairman and chief executive officer. ''Yet there remain<br />
too many borrowers whose credit is just a notch below what our<br />
underwriting has required who have been relegated to paying<br />
significantly higher mortgage rates in the so-called <a href='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/subprime/' rel='tag' class="hashtag">#subprime</a>  market.''<br />
Demographic information on these borrowers is sketchy. But at least one<br />
study indicates that 18 percent of the loans in the subprime market went<br />
to black borrowers, compared to 5 per cent of loans in the conventional<br />
loan market.<br />
In moving, even tentatively, into this new area of lending, Fannie Mae<br />
is taking on significantly more risk, which may not pose any<br />
difficulties during flush economic times. But the government-subsidized<br />
corporation may run into trouble in an economic downturn, prompting a<br />
government rescue similar to that of the savings and loan industry in<br />
the 1980's.<br />
''From the perspective of many people, including me, this is another<br />
thrift industry growing up around us,'' said Peter Wallison a resident<br />
fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. ''If they fail, the<br />
government will have to step up and bail them out the way it stepped up<br />
and bailed out the thrift industry.''<br />
Under Fannie Mae's pilot program, consumers who qualify can secure a<br />
mortgage with an interest rate one percentage point above that of a<br />
conventional, 30-year fixed rate mortgage of less than $240,000 -- a<br />
rate that currently averages about 7.76 per cent. If the borrower makes<br />
his or her monthly payments on time for two years, the one percentage<br />
point premium is dropped.<br />
Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, does not<br />
lend money directly to consumers. Instead, it purchases loans that banks<br />
make on what is called the secondary market. By expanding the type of<br />
loans that it will buy, Fannie Mae is hoping to spur banks to make more<br />
loans to people with less-than-stellar credit ratings.<br />
Fannie Mae officials stress that the new mortgages will be extended to<br />
all potential borrowers who can qualify for a mortgage. But they add<br />
that the move is intended in part to increase the number of minority and<br />
low income home owners who tend to have worse credit ratings than<br />
non-Hispanic whites.<br />
Home ownership has, in fact, exploded among minorities during the<br />
economic boom of the 1990's. The number of mortgages extended to<br />
Hispanic applicants jumped by 87.2 per cent from 1993 to 1998, according<br />
to Harvard University's Joint Center for Housing Studies. During that<br />
same period the number of African Americans who got mortgages to buy a<br />
home increased by 71.9 per cent and the number of Asian Americans by<br />
46.3 per cent</p>
<p>Last Updated ( Friday, 30 July 2010 )<br />
]&#8220;&#8221;"]</p>
<p></bret_e_cahill></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/13/simplicity-economics-v-complexity-economics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michigan&#8217;s ban on using race and gender as a factor</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/11/michigans-ban-on-using-race-and-gender-as-a-factor-50/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/11/michigans-ban-on-using-race-and-gender-as-a-factor-50/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACTION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFFIRMATIVE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ARGUING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COUNTER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EQUAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUPHEMISMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HALF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIGMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PRETENDING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REQUIRED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEPARATE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOMEHOW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TELL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utopia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=22289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 7/11/2011 11:03 AM, RD Sandman wrote: > Beam Me Up Scotty wrote > in news:4E19F2E5.4060709 @&#038;*$?%blackhole.nebulax.com: > >> On 7/10/2011 1:19 PM, RD Sandman wrote: >>> &#8220;Scout&#8221; wrote in >>> news:ivampu$fej$1 @&#038;*$?%dont-email.me: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> &#8220;RD Sandman&#8221; wrote in message >>>> news:Xns9F1D8E5F31CC8hopewell @&#038;*$?%216.196.121.131&#8230; >>>>> Beam Me Up Scotty >>>>> wrote in news:4E188F6B.9000400 @&#038;*$?%blackhole.nebulax.com: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 7/11/2011 11:03 AM, RD Sandman wrote:<br />
> Beam Me Up Scotty
<then -Destroy-Everything<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote<br />
> in news:4E19F2E5.4060709<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>blackhole.nebulax.com:<br />
><br />
>> On 7/10/2011 1:19 PM, RD Sandman wrote:<br />
>>> &#8220;Scout&#8221; <me4guns @verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in<br />
>>> news:ivampu$fej$1<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>dont-email.me:<br />
>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> &#8220;RD Sandman&#8221; <rdsandman @comcast[remove].net> wrote in message<br />
>>>> news:Xns9F1D8E5F31CC8hopewell<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>216.196.121.131&#8230;<br />
>>>>> Beam Me Up Scotty
<then -Destroy-Everything<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>blackhole.nebulax.com>
>>>>> wrote in news:4E188F6B.9000400<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>blackhole.nebulax.com:<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>>> On 7/9/2011 11:48 AM, RD Sandman wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> Beam Me Up Scotty </then>
<then -Destroy-Everything<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>blackhole.nebulax.com>
>>>>> wrote<br />
>>>>>>> in news:4E177E33.3010402<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>blackhole.nebulax.com:<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> On 7/6/2011 7:45 PM, Bob LeChevalier wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>> Beam Me Up Scotty </then>
<then -Destroy-<br />
> <a href="mailto:Everything<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>blackhole.nebulax.com">Everything<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>blackhole.nebulax.com</a>><br />
>>>>>>>>> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>>> You&#8217;re suggesting Jim Crow laws are constitutional as long as<br />
>>>>>>>>>> you enforce them equally&#8230;.?<br />
>>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> They *were* constitutional, until Congress passed the Civil<br />
>>>>>>>>> Rights acts that changed the &#8220;enforcement&#8221; provisions of the<br />
>>>>>>>>> 14th.<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> Which made laws that were NOT equal and therefore could NOT be<br />
>>>>> enforced<br />
>>>>>>>> equally. Writing Unconstitutional laws and enforcing them is<br />
>>>>>>>> discrimination.  Discrimination being equally applied is NOT<br />
> equal<br />
>>>>>>>> justice under the law.<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> &#8220;&#8230;equal protection of the laws&#8230;&#8221;.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> NOT &#8230;equal outcome of the laws&#8230;.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> NOT &#8230;equal stuff provided by the laws&#8230;<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> Laws and their enforcement are constitutionally required to be<br />
>>>>>> equal, there is no FAIR in the word equal.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> No, they aren&#8217;t.  The Constitution requires that people get the same<br />
>>>>> protections under the law.  It does not say that all people are<br />
> equal<br />
>>>>> or that they will all get the same result.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> One quick question.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Would &#8220;Separate but Equal&#8221; then be just as Constitutional?<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> Yes and we still use it in gender specific Bathrooms in public schools,<br />
><br />
> Oh, just how many of them have urinals?</p>
<p>One says boys the other girls, that is separate but equal.</p>
<p>A PERSON WITH A MALE APPENDAGE CAN&#8217;T SIMPLY WALK INTO THE GIRLS TOILET,<br />
JUST AS A BLACK THAT COULDN&#8217;T SIT IN THE FRONT HALF OF THE BUS BECAUSE<br />
OF THEIR SKIN PIGMENT.</p>
<p>>> although in some bars and other places the men&#8217;s room looks like a war<br />
>> was just fought or a <acronym title="shit"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> s&*$?%t</span></acronym> bomb just went off, it&#8217;s still a bathroom<br />
> that we use.<br />
>><br />
>> Is it proper in all places and all venues?  I&#8217;d say no&#8230;..<br />
>><br />
>> Would you create single person toilets in schools and in large<br />
>> government and military institutions where it will drive up the cost,<br />
>> just to rid us of dirty men&#8217;s bathrooms and make them all dirty, so I<br />
>> can feel better about myself?<br />
><br />
> Just what does this have to do with separate but equal?</p>
<p>IF YOU DON&#8217;T KNOW I CAN&#8217;T TELL YOU.    THAT&#8217;S JUST SAD.</p>
<p>>> The religion of &#8220;equal outcome&#8221; or &#8220;Social Justice&#8221; is practiced by<br />
>> redistribution and that means that rather than everyone striving for<br />
> the<br />
>> best, everyone is dragged to a point where everyone is the same Which<br />
> is<br />
>> the &#8220;lowest common denominator&#8221;.  it&#8217;s called Homogenized, and it&#8217;s<br />
> what<br />
>> they do to milk to keep the fat evenly distributed.<br />
><br />
><br />
> Who&#8217;s arguing for &#8220;equal outcome&#8221; or &#8220;social justice&#8221; in this thread?  Or<br />
> do you just like to hear yourself whine?</p>
<p>YOU&#8217;RE ARGUING WITH YOUR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND PRETENDING THAT SEPARATE<br />
BUT EQUAL IS SOMEHOW UNCONSTITUTIONAL.</p>
<p>Affirmative action is unconstitutional, it&#8217;s NOT government treating all<br />
American persons equal.</p>
<p>EQUAL OUTCOME AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION ARE THE SAME THING AND THEY ARE<br />
EUPHEMISMS FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE.</p>
<p>THE WHOLE IDEA IS COUNTER TO THE CONSTITUTION WHERE GOVERNMENT IS<br />
REQUIRED TO TREAT PEOPLE EQUAL UNDER THE LAW.</p>
<p>>> It creates mediocrity.  In nature and in humans the cream floats to the<br />
>> top, and without cream in your milk it wouldn&#8217;t be worth buying, so<br />
> some<br />
>> people believe that homogenizing humanity is the only way.  Some like<br />
>> Stalin and Mao believed in killing the smartest and brightest and the<br />
>> retarded and the dim and  then Homogenizing the rest like a professor<br />
>> that tosses out the high and low grades and then averages the remaining<br />
>> grades.<br />
>><br />
>> Mediocrity is like heaven for the brain dead drones and it&#8217;s like hell<br />
>> for the rest of us.  That&#8217;s why brain dead professors at colleges teach<br />
>> Socialism and Marxism and try to indoctrinate their students, they&#8217;re<br />
>> sitting in a dead end job where they can hide from reality&#8230;.  and<br />
> that<br />
>> allows them to do nothing and then complain about how they accomplish<br />
>> nothing while pretending to be doing something, and every day when they<br />
>> get home, they see another day gone and they have yet to accomplish<br />
>> anything(they just aren&#8217;t that smart).  The idea is that they want to<br />
>> train others to be good drones and not to accomplish anything either,<br />
>> maybe it&#8217;s to create a drone utopia or maybe it&#8217;s really just so the<br />
>> professors feel better that they won&#8217;t be the only worthless (won&#8217;t get<br />
>> off their <acronym title="ass"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> a&*$?%s</span></acronym> and do something) drones out there.<br />
>><br />
>> Tenure, retirement and utopia may be more injurious to the human mind<br />
>> than all the hardships and strife you can suffer.  It&#8217;s what kills the<br />
>> spark of life and that leads to being a drone.</p>
</then></rdsandman></me4guns></then>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/11/michigans-ban-on-using-race-and-gender-as-a-factor-50/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michigan&#8217;s ban on using race and gender as a factor</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/03/michigans-ban-on-using-race-and-gender-as-a-factor-7/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/03/michigans-ban-on-using-race-and-gender-as-a-factor-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 16:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affirmative Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JUSTICE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=21989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 7/2/2011 1:19 AM, Scout wrote: > > > &#8220;Bob LeChevalier&#8221; wrote in message > news:mu5t071tnd0qbddia0s60nqjmcd3pj0l4i @&#038;*$?%4ax.com&#8230; >> Beam Me Up Scotty >> wrote: >>> ["""[Detroit- Michigan's ban on using race and gender as a factor in >>> admission to public colleges and universities was overturned today by a >>> federal appeals court, which said [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 7/2/2011 1:19 AM, Scout wrote:<br />
><br />
><br />
> &#8220;Bob LeChevalier&#8221; <lojbab @lojban.org> wrote in message<br />
> news:mu5t071tnd0qbddia0s60nqjmcd3pj0l4i<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>4ax.com&#8230;<br />
>> Beam Me Up Scotty
<then -Destroy-Everything<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>blackhole.nebulax.com>
>> wrote:<br />
>>> ["""[Detroit- Michigan's ban on using race and gender as a factor in<br />
>>> admission to public colleges and universities was overturned today by a<br />
>>> federal appeals court, which said the voter-approved measure harms<br />
>>> minorities and is unconstitutional. ]&#8220;&#8221;"]<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>> That&#8217;s upside down, since using race and gender to select people is<br />
>>> violating the &#8220;nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal<br />
>>> protection of the laws.&#8221; part of the 14th amendment.<br />
>>><br />
>>> People being selected by gender and race is NOT equal&#8230;<br />
>><br />
>> Your opinion on that question does not matter.<br />
><br />
> So, you&#8217;re telling us that the opinion of the people does not matter?<br />
><br />
> Interesting.<br />
><br />
>> Congress has the power to decide how to enforce the 14th, not you.<br />
><br />
> So they enforce the law by ignoring the very language and principles of<br />
> the Amendment, and you don&#8217;t see the problem with that?<br />
><br />
><br />
>> They gave that power to the courts, subject to certain laws (the<br />
>> various Civil Rights Acts).  In certain cases those laws not only<br />
>> allow but require such selection.<br />
><br />
> I see, so equality equals discrimination&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;<br />
><br />
> &#8230;and you wonder why people don&#8217;t accept your claims.</p>
<p>He supports Social Justice, and we know Equal Justice and Social Justice<br />
can *NOT* coexist&#8230;..   When the Socialists strive for social justice<br />
it&#8217;s achieved with laws like &#8220;Affirmative Action&#8221; which require that<br />
equal Justice be suspended.</p>
<p>The Constitution allows for equal treatment but it does NOT allow for<br />
unequal treatment to create an equal outcome, which is what SOCIAL<br />
JUSTICE is.</p>
<p>The Socialists still don&#8217;t get that, if they want to change things they<br />
need to begin with what is in the constitution, and delusional ideas<br />
that the constitution permits their Socialism is not our reality.</p>
</then></lojbab></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/03/michigans-ban-on-using-race-and-gender-as-a-factor-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Confederate After All.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/29/confederate-after-all/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/29/confederate-after-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[shall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LIFE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lisa Lisa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=21883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 6/28/2011 10:54 PM, RT wrote: > Werner wrote: >> >> On Jun 25, 10:29 am, Lisa Lisa wrote:&#8230; >>> >>> “I see abortion as an act of violence so I see it as a s >>> The congressman pointed to the We the People Act that he has backed, >>> which would take social [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 6/28/2011 10:54 PM, RT wrote:<br />
> Werner wrote:<br />
>><br />
>> On Jun 25, 10:29 am, Lisa Lisa <harryharr ...@yahoo.com> wrote:&#8230;<br />
>>><br />
>>> “I see abortion as an act of violence so I see it as a s<br />
>>> The congressman pointed to the We the People Act that he has backed,<br />
>>> which would take social issues back to the states, and expressed<br />
>>> dissatisfaction with Congress for never passing it &#8212; even when<br />
>>> conservatives and Republicans controlled the White House and both<br />
>>> chambers of Congress.<br />
>>><br />
>>> “We could have stopped millions and millions of abortions,” said Paul.<br />
>>> “We should not legalize the killing of an individual.”state issue,”<br />
>>> said Paul. “When we make it a national issue, we get what we’ve had.”<br />
>>><br />
>>> Paul said the Supreme Court of the United States should have never<br />
>>> heard Roe v. Wade, the case that legalized abortion, and said that<br />
>>> social issues &#8212; including abortion, school prayer and marriage &#8211;<br />
>>> should be handled by the states and not by the federal courts.<br />
>>> &#8230;<br />
>>><br />
>><br />
>> Seems like a reasonable solution. Want an abortion? Vote with your<br />
>> feet.  Go to an abortion state. It gives people a choice. What do you<br />
>> have when you have no choice?<br />
><br />
> The right to an abortion is a Constitutional one.</p>
<p>The baby in the uterus&#8217; right to LIFE, LIBERTY and the pursuit of<br />
happiness. Is in amendment 14 section 1</p>
<p>["""[nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or<br />
property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its<br />
jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.]&#8220;&#8221;"]</p>
<p>A baby in the uterus is a person and has an equal right to life as the<br />
mother.  If the baby needed to kill the mother to make life better,<br />
would you allow the baby&#8217;s wants/needs to kill the mother?</p>
<p></harryharr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/29/confederate-after-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three years of making things worse is all Obama has accomplished!</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/28/three-years-of-making-things-worse-is-all-obama-has-accomplished/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/28/three-years-of-making-things-worse-is-all-obama-has-accomplished/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Rubin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craig Chilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Felix Reynaldo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMPOSSIBLE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[increased]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOTHING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Sat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SHORT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TELL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=21811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 6/28/2011 2:34 AM, Felix Reynaldo wrote: > > &#8220;(¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯) http://www.LayoffRemedy.com&#8221; > wrote in message news:7rki071j9s9oo7ks6tu1p8imvfq4pa97cq @&#038;*$?%4ax.com&#8230; >> On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 03:41:10 -0400, >> &#8220;Felix Reynaldo&#8221; wrote: >>> (¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯) http://www.LayoffRemedy.com wrote: >> >> >>>> TELL CONGRESS: >>>> >>>> Do NOT, under ANY circumstances, raise the debt limit! [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 6/28/2011 2:34 AM, Felix Reynaldo wrote:<br />
><br />
> &#8220;(¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯) <a href="http://www.LayoffRemedy.com" >http://www.LayoffRemedy.com</a>&#8221; <c @z.com><br />
> wrote in message news:7rki071j9s9oo7ks6tu1p8imvfq4pa97cq<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>4ax.com&#8230;<br />
>> On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 03:41:10 -0400,<br />
>> &#8220;Felix Reynaldo&#8221; <felixreynaldo @hotmail.com> wrote:<br />
>>>  (¯`·.¸ Craig Chilton ¸.·´¯) <a href="http://www.LayoffRemedy.com" >http://www.LayoffRemedy.com</a> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>>> TELL CONGRESS:<br />
>>>><br />
>>>>        Do NOT, under ANY circumstances, raise the debt limit!<br />
>>>><br />
>>>>       Just let the chips fall where they may!<br />
>><br />
>>>   Even the &#8216;baggers are this irresponsible&#8230; or are they?<br />
>>><br />
>>>   Some guesses as to what a default would mean:<br />
>>><br />
>>> &#8212; Series E and EE Savings bonds become worthless<br />
>>> &#8212; Social security payments would stop<br />
>>> &#8212; Health care facilities that rely on social security and medicare<br />
>>> would go<br />
>>> out of business<br />
>>> &#8212;  USD loses at least 20% of its value<br />
>>> &#8212; Energy costs would increase exponentially<br />
>>> &#8212; More foreclosures<br />
>>> &#8212; Pension and 401K plans would become nearly worthless.<br />
>>> &#8212; Utility rates would increase or utility companies would go bankrupt<br />
>><br />
>>     ALL of which could be avoided if Congress balanced the budget<br />
>> SHORT of the debt ceiling.<br />
><br />
> It is IMPOSSIBLE to balance the budget during a recession.  That makes<br />
> NO sense at all.</p>
<p>It is impossible to stop spending when in an economic Boom.</p>
<p>> What also does not make sense was Bush&#8217;s eliminating Bob Rubin&#8217;s plan to<br />
> pay down the national debt.  Paying down the national debt had the<br />
> effect of the government no longer competing with private enterprise for<br />
> capital. The result was one of the greatest stock markets in history and<br />
> 4% unemployment.</p>
<p>Government can quit borrowing at any time they grow the nads to stop<br />
wasting money on Liberal give away programs and giant security programs.</p>
<p>That will always help the private economy like the Stock Market, when it<br />
was free. Now the stock Market is a government managed economic<br />
disaster.   But most of what government controls eventually becomes a<br />
disaster and a crisis that requires more of our private sector money to<br />
keep the government disaster alive.</p>
<p>> Instead of paying down the national debt, Bush43 sent everyone a $300<br />
> check and left office with a 7.4% unemployment and increasing the<br />
> national debt by 80% after inheriting Clinton&#8217;s 4% unemployment.</p>
<p>And Obama has 9.2% unemployment and has increased the debt from 9<br />
trillion to 15 trillion in only 3 years&#8230;.</p>
<p>Obama has fixed NOTHING.</p>
<p>Three years of making things worse is all Obama has accomplished!</p>
<p></felixreynaldo></c></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/28/three-years-of-making-things-worse-is-all-obama-has-accomplished/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If Anthony Weiner isn&#8217;t going to live up to his MARRIAGE vows then he also won&#8217;t live up to his OATH OF OFFICE.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/25/if-anthony-weiner-isnt-going-to-live-up-to-his-marriage-vows-then-he-also-wont-live-up-to-his-oath-of-office-90/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/25/if-anthony-weiner-isnt-going-to-live-up-to-his-marriage-vows-then-he-also-wont-live-up-to-his-oath-of-office-90/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 20:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anthony Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Pharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FICA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FWIW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hopewell Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MARRIAGE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare Part]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OATH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Puerto Rico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=21757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 6/24/2011 4:21 PM, RD Sandman wrote: > Bob LeChevalier wrote in > news:feu807lk9mslbufat6n4768keq8m9fn870 @&#038;*$?%4ax.com: > >> RD Sandman wrote: >>> Bob LeChevalier wrote in >>> news:0s67079bgfkkhtqrtdhsvnmu3rgt5ahaum @&#038;*$?%4ax.com: >>> >>>> &#8220;Scout&#8221; wrote: >>>>> &#8220;Bob LeChevalier&#8221; wrote in message >>>>> news:fu0407l7mtfquqk1uinc347r1bh1fk7lst @&#038;*$?%4ax.com&#8230; >>>>>> RD Sandman wrote: >>>>>>> The bottom line is that they want single payer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 6/24/2011 4:21 PM, RD Sandman wrote:<br />
> Bob LeChevalier <lojbab @lojban.org> wrote in<br />
> news:feu807lk9mslbufat6n4768keq8m9fn870<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>4ax.com:<br />
><br />
>> RD Sandman <rdsandman @comcast[remove].net> wrote:<br />
>>> Bob LeChevalier <lojbab @lojban.org> wrote in<br />
>>> news:0s67079bgfkkhtqrtdhsvnmu3rgt5ahaum<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>4ax.com:<br />
>>><br />
>>>> &#8220;Scout&#8221; <me4guns @verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:<br />
>>>>> &#8220;Bob LeChevalier&#8221; <lojbab @lojban.org> wrote in message<br />
>>>>> news:fu0407l7mtfquqk1uinc347r1bh1fk7lst<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>4ax.com&#8230;<br />
>>>>>> RD Sandman <rdsandman @comcast[remove].net> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> The bottom line is that they want single payer for all and that<br />
>>>>>>> payer is the government.  Not necessarily a bad thing, but how in<br />
>>>>>>> the world do they expect to pay for it?<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> The way every government in the world that has single payer pays<br />
>>>>>> for it.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> By going broke?<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Most other countries are not growing broke.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Interesting, the CBO was in an article today talking about how close<br />
>>> this country is to disaster on the debt.<br />
>><br />
>> The same article possibly.<br />
>><br />
>> Using the baseline scenario, in which the Bush tax cuts expire, along<br />
>> with all other temporary measures, everything improves.<br />
>><br />
>> Using the alternative scenario, in which all of the temporary tax cuts<br />
>> are renewed indefinitely or made permanent is a disaster scenario.<br />
>><br />
>> The article I cited had both charts.<br />
><br />
> And I agree that taxes will have to be raised. ..I just think that they<br />
> should be raised on both the rich and the middle class, particularly<br />
> since one is worth $700B over 10 years and the other is worth $4.4T over<br />
> the same time frame.  I also feel that the lid needs to be taken off<br />
> FICA.<br />
><br />
>>>>>> Medicare is single payer, and it works.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> And is going broke.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Only because the private sector overtreats and overcharges.<br />
>>><br />
>>> The private sector on Medicare is not overcharging service since those<br />
>>> charges are fixed<br />
>><br />
>> No, they aren&#8217;t.  They are based on a complicated fee schedule which<br />
>> is calculated based on non-fixed parameters<br />
>> <a href="http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/433293_2" >http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/433293_2</a><br />
>> gives the details of the formula.<br />
><br />
> They are not individually negotiated by the physicians when the charge is<br />
> made.  It is a fee schedule and the physician gets paid what the fee<br />
> schedule is set at unless he meets certain conditions, one of which is<br />
> rural area.<br />
><br />
>> <a href="http://www.statehealthfacts.org/comparetable.jsp?cat=6&#038;ind=289" >http://www.statehealthfacts.org/comparetable.jsp?cat=6&#038;ind=289</a><br />
>> shows that there can be a wide range of payments for the same<br />
>> procedure, with a hip/knee replacement costing the government as<br />
>> little as $6100 in Puerto Rico, and as much as $19,500 in Maryland<br />
>> (with a 50% variation within Maryland alone).<br />
><br />
> It used to be that physician rates were set due to the cost of living in<br />
> a certain social structure that a physician practiced in.  One reason<br />
> what the same operation cost more in New York City, than in Hopewell<br />
> Arkansas.<br />
><br />
>> The first site also describes how the schedule is constantly being<br />
>> revised based on changes in the practice of medicine.  There is an AMA<br />
>> panel that collects data and feeds it to a Medicare Board that almost<br />
>> always accepts whatever the doctors say.  Supposedly the changes have<br />
>> to preserve budget neutrality, but obviously in real life the numbers<br />
>> keep going up.<br />
>><br />
>>> and, FWIW, less than what is paid by the private sector.<br />
>><br />
>> Yes, because the medical industry jacks up prices for the private<br />
>> sector to pay for the discounts it gives the government.<br />
><br />
> To meet overall yearly pay.<br />
><br />
>   And jacks up<br />
>> prices to the uninsured and self-insured to pay for the negotiated<br />
>> sale prices that it gives to insurance companies.<br />
><br />
> In some cases, the reverse is true.  A physician may give a negotiated<br />
> price (or annual fee) to someone who is a cash customer that is lower<br />
> than either rate.  Of course, it is assumed that the annual fee is enough<br />
> to cover the expenses, make a profit most years.<br />
><br />
>   Similarly, Big<br />
>> Pharma charges an order of magnitude more for drugs here that they<br />
>> sell for much lower in other countries.<br />
>><br />
>> Why?  Because they can.<br />
><br />
> Yep.  One of the big mistakes in Medicare Part D was the refusal to let<br />
> Medicare (the largest customer in the country) negotiate drug prices and<br />
> the pharmaceutical companies are the only game in town for that new drug.<br />
><br />
><br />
> On some new drugs, however, the initial prices are ostensibly to recover<br />
> costs of research and development of those new drugs.  Therefore, they<br />
> get patent protection for a number of years (generally 12) before<br />
> generics can be produced.  The producer of the generic has no cost for<br />
> research.<br />
><br />
>>> They do overtreat, partially because no tort reform has been<br />
>>> passed to address malpractice suits and the result is defensive<br />
>>> medicine.<br />
>><br />
>> Partially, but the main reason is that they treat because they can,<br />
>> and because they get paid for it.<br />
><br />
> You have a much more cynical view of it than I do.  I admit there is that<br />
> going on but don&#8217;t think it is the only driver on those prices.<br />
><br />
>> Private industry in the US is expected by investors to keep on growing<br />
>> (faster than inflation).  Earnings have to increase every quarter. The<br />
>> incentives to management for increasing business are high -<br />
>> multi-million dollar salaries and bonuses.  But the only way to<br />
>> increase is to sell more goods and services, and if the primary<br />
>> customer is Medicare, they will use all the wiles of corporate America<br />
>> to find ways to get Medicare to pay more  and more  and more&#8230;<br />
><br />
> Which is why Medicare needs to be able to negotiate.  Those prices will<br />
> come down if the largest customer tells them to screw off we will stick<br />
> with the drug you are trying to replace.</p>
<p>What makes you think that everyone&#8217;s prices will go down&#8230;..</p>
<p>They may charge more for private sector people like businesses give<br />
discounts to the 55 and older but the young get to take up the slack and<br />
pay full retail price.</p>
<p>If medicare pays  less someone else will pay more.</p>
<p>There is no free ride.</p>
<p></rdsandman></lojbab></me4guns></lojbab></rdsandman></lojbab></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/25/if-anthony-weiner-isnt-going-to-live-up-to-his-marriage-vows-then-he-also-wont-live-up-to-his-oath-of-office-90/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Never Be Racist.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/15/never-be-racist/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/15/never-be-racist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=21372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 6/15/2011 12:44 PM, John Smith wrote: > On 6/15/2011 9:15 AM, Brad Guth wrote: > >> &#8230; >> In other words, no individuals or fellow groups of social/political or >> faith-based cartels and cabals that are well known as being racist and >> never police their own kind (unless caught red-handed and prosecuted >> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 6/15/2011 12:44 PM, John Smith wrote:<br />
> On 6/15/2011 9:15 AM, Brad Guth wrote:<br />
><br />
>> &#8230;<br />
>> In other words, no individuals or fellow groups of social/political or<br />
>> faith-based cartels and cabals that are well known as being racist and<br />
>> never police their own kind (unless caught red-handed and prosecuted<br />
>> by outsiders) are ever responsible for anything bad that happens?<br />
>><br />
>>   <a href="http://www.wanttoknow.info/" >http://www.wanttoknow.info/</a><br />
>>   <a href="http://translate.google.com/#" >http://translate.google.com/#</a><br />
>>   Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”<br />
><br />
> Negros are VERY BAD about policing their own.</p>
<p>people are very bad about it and the &#8220;DON&#8217;T BE A SNITCH&#8221; Tee shirts and<br />
logo was popular.</p>
<p>The idea was NOT to help the police.  Great plan to encourage crime.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cafepress.co.uk/nosnitch" >http://www.cafepress.co.uk/nosnitch</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/15/never-be-racist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Believing In Santa Claus</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/11/believing-in-santa-claus/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/11/believing-in-santa-claus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=21252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 6/11/2011 3:31 PM, The Shadow wrote: > On 6/11/2011 7:15 AM, Goodbye Pugs! wrote: >> Limbaugh: &#8220;Belief In Man-Made Global Warming Is A Lot Like Believing In >> Santa Claus&#8221; >> >> http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201106100016 >> >> I wish those on BOTH sides of the debate would stop referring to >> &#8220;believing&#8221; or &#8220;not believing&#8221; in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 6/11/2011 3:31 PM, The Shadow wrote:<br />
> On 6/11/2011 7:15 AM, Goodbye Pugs! wrote:<br />
>> Limbaugh: &#8220;Belief In Man-Made Global Warming Is A Lot Like Believing In<br />
>> Santa Claus&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>> <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201106100016" >http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201106100016</a><br />
>><br />
>> I wish those on BOTH sides of the debate would stop referring to<br />
>> &#8220;believing&#8221; or &#8220;not believing&#8221; in global warming. Belief has nothing to<br />
>> do with it. It&#8217;s an acceptance or rejection of the scientific evidence.<br />
><br />
> Posed by social scientists who are very emotional on issues concerning<br />
> the left.</p>
<p>He makes it sound as if there were actual verifiable tests that prove<br />
Global warming is happening and is man made.</p>
<p>Where is the verifiable evidence that the heating and adding mass to the<br />
atmosphere is happening?</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t heating and adding mass increase the volume(size)  or<br />
atmospheric pressure of the atmosphere or some combination there of?</p>
<p>if not then the atmosphere is purging something to keep it in balance.</p>
<p>Global warming is a myth, a ruse&#8230;..  a lie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/11/believing-in-santa-claus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adoption vs Abortion vs Government Paying 50% of Child Support</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/05/19/adoption-vs-abortion-vs-government-paying-50-of-child-support-14/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/05/19/adoption-vs-abortion-vs-government-paying-50-of-child-support-14/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 01:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crazy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotty Everyth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=20516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 5/19/2011 6:06 PM, SilentOtto wrote: > On May 19, 10:13 am, Beam Me Up Scotty Everyth&#8230;@Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote: >> On 5/19/2011 7:56 AM, SilentOtto wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On May 18, 10:08 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty >> Everyth&#8230;@Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote: >>>> On 5/15/2011 5:51 PM, SilentOtto wrote: >> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 5/19/2011 6:06 PM, SilentOtto wrote:<br />
> On May 19, 10:13 am, Beam Me Up Scotty
<then -Destroy-<br />
> <a href="mailto:Everyth...@Blackhole.NebulaX.com">Everyth&#8230;@Blackhole.NebulaX.com</a>> wrote:<br />
>> On 5/19/2011 7:56 AM, SilentOtto wrote:<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>> On May 18, 10:08 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty </then>
<then -Destroy-<br />
>>> <a href="mailto:Everyth...@Blackhole.NebulaX.com">Everyth&#8230;@Blackhole.NebulaX.com</a>> wrote:<br />
>>>> On 5/15/2011 5:51 PM, SilentOtto wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>> On May 11, 7:52 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty </then>
<then -Destroy-<br />
>>>>> <a href="mailto:Everyth...@Blackhole.NebulaX.com">Everyth&#8230;@Blackhole.NebulaX.com</a>> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> Those who are sincere about saving the lives of unborn babies will<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> adopt an unwanted pregnancy.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> Just why do you assume that anyone who opposes killing babies unborn or<br />
>>>>>> born either can or wants to adopt, they are no less deserving of their<br />
>>>>>> own opinion.<br />
>><br />
>>>>> Everyone is entitled to an opinion, and their entitled to express that<br />
>>>>> opinion in elections where matters of law are decided, whether their<br />
>>>>> position is hypocritical or not.<br />
>><br />
>>>>> However, if their opposition to abortion rests on a moral framework,<br />
>>>>> which most anti-abortion advocates claim, then it&#8217;s morally<br />
>>>>> inconsistent to refuse to shoulder the burden that their demands will<br />
>>>>> create.<br />
>><br />
>>>>> If it&#8217;s immoral for a woman to abort a fetus that she can&#8217;t afford or<br />
>>>>> isn&#8217;t willing to  raise, then it&#8217;s also immoral for anti-abortion<br />
>>>>> advocates to refuse support for a child that they can&#8217;t afford or<br />
>>>>> aren&#8217;t willing to raise.<br />
>><br />
>>>> Do I need to go get old people from the nursing home&#8230;.  because I<br />
>>>> don&#8217;t believe they should be euthanized?<br />
>><br />
>>> Not as long as you&#8217;re willing to pay for their care.  So far, we<br />
>>> democrats have managed to keep the systems that have been created for<br />
>>> indigent elderly running, instead of dying from neglect as happened<br />
>>> before the social safety net was created.<br />
>><br />
>>> But, if you rightards get your way on the budget, you&#8217;re going to have<br />
>>> to start making some hard choices, rightard.<br />
>><br />
>>> Are you going to pay for taking care of the elderly in care facilities<br />
>>> or are you planning on letting them die?<br />
>><br />
>>>> Do I need to have people on death row released to my care because I<br />
>>>> don&#8217;t believe in the death penalty?<br />
>><br />
>>> See above.<br />
>><br />
>>> You&#8217;re paying for their care, so no need for dramatic measures.<br />
>><br />
>>> I know you rightards don&#8217;t have much problem paying for prisons, so<br />
>>> the money for their care is likely safe for the time being.<br />
>><br />
>>> Heh heh&#8230;<br />
>><br />
>>> Rightards&#8230;<br />
>><br />
>>> Batshit crazy and dogshit stupid, every single last one of you.<br />
>><br />
>> Forcing people to pay is your whole plan in life?<br />
><br />
> Not my personal life plan, rightard.<br />
><br />
> However, it&#8217;s a fact that many people reach the point where they can<br />
> no longer care for themselves independently and lack the means to pay<br />
> others to take care of them out of their own pocket..<br />
><br />
> I know you rightards don&#8217;t like it.<br />
><br />
> Oh well&#8230;<br />
><br />
> I&#8217;m not interested in hearing a rightard lecture on how they -should-<br />
> have made better choices in life.<br />
><br />
> The fact is that they didn&#8217;t.<br />
><br />
> It&#8217;s either pay to keep them alive or let them or let them die.<br />
><br />
> Those are real choices for a real world.<br />
><br />
> Pick a side, rightard.<br />
><br />
>> You want to force<br />
>> everyone to pay to kill those &#8220;you&#8221; deem as useless human lives?<br />
><br />
> I didn&#8217;t deem anyone as anything.<br />
><br />
> I&#8217;m merely pointing out that you that if you prevent women from having<br />
> abortions, there -will- be children who will need to be reared either<br />
> by others, either publicly or privately.<br />
><br />
> If you rightards aren&#8217;t willing to pay for keeping them alive by<br />
> personally raising them yourselves, or willing to fund state programs<br />
> that do so, then they -will- die.<br />
><br />
> That&#8217;s one of those brutal facts of life that you rightards can&#8217;t deny<br />
> yourself out of.<br />
><br />
> You can&#8217;t run a child&#8217;s survival needs at a deficit, like you<br />
> rightards try and do with everything else.<br />
><br />
> It&#8217;s either take care of them or watch them die.<br />
><br />
> Those are the -only- two choices.<br />
><br />
>> Abortions, and needles for death row, and pills for the elderly to die<br />
>> quietly&#8230;..  &#8220;You are a real human being&#8221; <img src='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
><br />
> You seem confused, rightard.<br />
><br />
> I&#8217;m the liberal in this discussion.<br />
><br />
> I&#8217;m the one who&#8217;s been voting for politicians who support aggressive<br />
> birth control training and availability for those likely to get<br />
> pregnant, a social safety net and generally oppose the death penalty.<br />
><br />
> You&#8217;re the rightard who votes for politicians who think that a<br />
> sufficiently stern lecture on personal responsibility is the answer to<br />
> all of societies ills.<br />
><br />
> Try and keep up.<br />
><br />
>> You believe that collective killing is *NOT* murder? He who can lie,<br />
>> cheat, and steal to get the most votes lives.<br />
><br />
> I didn&#8217;t suggest killing anyone, rightard.<br />
><br />
> I pointed out that many will die unless others pay to care for them.</p>
<p>And the States have the ability to tax and spend on their citizens&#8230;<br />
The federal Government has no constitutional power to tax me and give<br />
that money to other citizens.</p>
<p>><br />
> It&#8217;s called reality.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s called &#8220;Unconstitutional&#8221;</p>
<p>> Perhaps you&#8217;ve heard of it?<br />
><br />
> Heh heh&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard of breaking the oath of office to protect and defend the<br />
constitution.</p>
<p>>> You live in a &#8220;Lord of the Flies&#8221; world.</p>
</then>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/05/19/adoption-vs-abortion-vs-government-paying-50-of-child-support-14/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adoption vs Abortion vs Government Paying 50% of Child Support</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/05/19/adoption-vs-abortion-vs-government-paying-50-of-child-support-13/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/05/19/adoption-vs-abortion-vs-government-paying-50-of-child-support-13/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 19:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotty Everyth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=20504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 5/19/2011 7:56 AM, SilentOtto wrote: > On May 18, 10:08 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty Everyth&#8230;@Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote: >> On 5/15/2011 5:51 PM, SilentOtto wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On May 11, 7:52 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty >> Everyth&#8230;@Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Those who are sincere about saving the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 5/19/2011 7:56 AM, SilentOtto wrote:<br />
> On May 18, 10:08 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty
<then -Destroy-<br />
> <a href="mailto:Everyth...@Blackhole.NebulaX.com">Everyth&#8230;@Blackhole.NebulaX.com</a>> wrote:<br />
>> On 5/15/2011 5:51 PM, SilentOtto wrote:<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>> On May 11, 7:52 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty </then>
<then -Destroy-<br />
>>> <a href="mailto:Everyth...@Blackhole.NebulaX.com">Everyth&#8230;@Blackhole.NebulaX.com</a>> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>> Those who are sincere about saving the lives of unborn babies will<br />
>>>>>>>>> adopt an unwanted pregnancy.<br />
>><br />
>>>> Just why do you assume that anyone who opposes killing babies unborn or<br />
>>>> born either can or wants to adopt, they are no less deserving of their<br />
>>>> own opinion.<br />
>><br />
>>> Everyone is entitled to an opinion, and their entitled to express that<br />
>>> opinion in elections where matters of law are decided, whether their<br />
>>> position is hypocritical or not.<br />
>><br />
>>> However, if their opposition to abortion rests on a moral framework,<br />
>>> which most anti-abortion advocates claim, then it&#8217;s morally<br />
>>> inconsistent to refuse to shoulder the burden that their demands will<br />
>>> create.<br />
>><br />
>>> If it&#8217;s immoral for a woman to abort a fetus that she can&#8217;t afford or<br />
>>> isn&#8217;t willing to  raise, then it&#8217;s also immoral for anti-abortion<br />
>>> advocates to refuse support for a child that they can&#8217;t afford or<br />
>>> aren&#8217;t willing to raise.<br />
>><br />
>> Do I need to go get old people from the nursing home&#8230;.  because I<br />
>> don&#8217;t believe they should be euthanized?<br />
><br />
> Not as long as you&#8217;re willing to pay for their care.  So far, we<br />
> democrats have managed to keep the systems that have been created for<br />
> indigent elderly running, instead of dying from neglect as happened<br />
> before the social safety net was created.</p>
<p>Old people dying in the streets, post some photos of Americans stepping<br />
over old dead people, I&#8217;ve never seen that evidence&#8230;.</p>
<p>SS was created in the mid 1930s so show some pre 1930s photos of streets<br />
littered with dead bodies in American cities&#8230;.</p>
<p>> But, if you rightards get your way on the budget, you&#8217;re going to have<br />
> to start making some hard choices, rightard.</p>
<p>Which Liberals refused to make just as they refused to make a Federal<br />
Budget.</p>
<p>> Are you going to pay for taking care of the elderly in care facilities<br />
> or are you planning on letting them die?</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t the elderly pay for their own care?   I pay for all I get,<br />
granted I could probably throw reality into the wind and spend ten times<br />
what I spend on medical.  But I choose to live within my budget.</p>
<p>>> Do I need to have people on death row released to my care because I<br />
>> don&#8217;t believe in the death penalty?<br />
><br />
> See above.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t pay for any of those&#8230;..  and I don&#8217;t have Health Insurance.</p>
<p>You pay to kill Americans in the uterus and in Prison and in nursing<br />
homes&#8230;.</p>
</then>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/05/19/adoption-vs-abortion-vs-government-paying-50-of-child-support-13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adoption vs Abortion vs Government Paying 50% of Child Support</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/05/19/adoption-vs-abortion-vs-government-paying-50-of-child-support-7/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/05/19/adoption-vs-abortion-vs-government-paying-50-of-child-support-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 14:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crazy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotty Everyth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=20458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 5/19/2011 7:56 AM, SilentOtto wrote: > On May 18, 10:08 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty Everyth&#8230;@Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote: >> On 5/15/2011 5:51 PM, SilentOtto wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On May 11, 7:52 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty >> Everyth&#8230;@Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Those who are sincere about saving the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 5/19/2011 7:56 AM, SilentOtto wrote:<br />
> On May 18, 10:08 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty
<then -Destroy-<br />
> <a href="mailto:Everyth...@Blackhole.NebulaX.com">Everyth&#8230;@Blackhole.NebulaX.com</a>> wrote:<br />
>> On 5/15/2011 5:51 PM, SilentOtto wrote:<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>> On May 11, 7:52 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty </then>
<then -Destroy-<br />
>>> <a href="mailto:Everyth...@Blackhole.NebulaX.com">Everyth&#8230;@Blackhole.NebulaX.com</a>> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>> Those who are sincere about saving the lives of unborn babies will<br />
>>>>>>>>> adopt an unwanted pregnancy.<br />
>><br />
>>>> Just why do you assume that anyone who opposes killing babies unborn or<br />
>>>> born either can or wants to adopt, they are no less deserving of their<br />
>>>> own opinion.<br />
>><br />
>>> Everyone is entitled to an opinion, and their entitled to express that<br />
>>> opinion in elections where matters of law are decided, whether their<br />
>>> position is hypocritical or not.<br />
>><br />
>>> However, if their opposition to abortion rests on a moral framework,<br />
>>> which most anti-abortion advocates claim, then it&#8217;s morally<br />
>>> inconsistent to refuse to shoulder the burden that their demands will<br />
>>> create.<br />
>><br />
>>> If it&#8217;s immoral for a woman to abort a fetus that she can&#8217;t afford or<br />
>>> isn&#8217;t willing to  raise, then it&#8217;s also immoral for anti-abortion<br />
>>> advocates to refuse support for a child that they can&#8217;t afford or<br />
>>> aren&#8217;t willing to raise.<br />
>><br />
>> Do I need to go get old people from the nursing home&#8230;.  because I<br />
>> don&#8217;t believe they should be euthanized?<br />
><br />
> Not as long as you&#8217;re willing to pay for their care.  So far, we<br />
> democrats have managed to keep the systems that have been created for<br />
> indigent elderly running, instead of dying from neglect as happened<br />
> before the social safety net was created.<br />
><br />
> But, if you rightards get your way on the budget, you&#8217;re going to have<br />
> to start making some hard choices, rightard.<br />
><br />
> Are you going to pay for taking care of the elderly in care facilities<br />
> or are you planning on letting them die?<br />
><br />
>> Do I need to have people on death row released to my care because I<br />
>> don&#8217;t believe in the death penalty?<br />
><br />
> See above.<br />
><br />
> You&#8217;re paying for their care, so no need for dramatic measures.<br />
><br />
> I know you rightards don&#8217;t have much problem paying for prisons, so<br />
> the money for their care is likely safe for the time being.<br />
><br />
> Heh heh&#8230;<br />
><br />
> Rightards&#8230;<br />
><br />
> Batshit crazy and dogshit stupid, every single last one of you.</p>
<p>Forcing people to pay is your whole plan in life?   You want to force<br />
everyone to pay to kill those &#8220;you&#8221; deem as useless human lives?<br />
Abortions, and needles for death row, and pills for the elderly to die<br />
quietly&#8230;..  &#8220;You are a real human being&#8221; <img src='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>You believe that collective killing is *NOT* murder? He who can lie,<br />
cheat, and steal to get the most votes lives.</p>
<p>You live in a &#8220;Lord of the Flies&#8221; world.</p>
</then>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/05/19/adoption-vs-abortion-vs-government-paying-50-of-child-support-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Conservative to Hitler</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/05/09/from-conservative-to-hitler/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/05/09/from-conservative-to-hitler/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 18:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=20312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 5/9/2011 11:34 AM, Bible Studies with Satan wrote: > masonc wrote: > >> I was reading the history of the Weimar Republic on wikipedia and >> came upon this sequence: >> >> quote with skips: >> >> In line with conservative economic theory that less government >> spending would spur economic growth, &#8230; drastically [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 5/9/2011 11:34 AM, Bible Studies with Satan wrote:<br />
> masonc wrote:<br />
><br />
>> I was reading the history of the Weimar Republic on wikipedia and<br />
>> came upon this sequence:<br />
>><br />
>> quote with skips:<br />
>><br />
>>  In line with conservative economic theory that less government<br />
>> spending would spur economic growth, &#8230; drastically cut state<br />
>> expenditures, including in the social sector.<br />
>> &#8230;.<br />
>> The bulk of German capitalists and land-owners originally supported<br />
>> the conservative experiment: &#8230;. believing the conservatives would<br />
>> best serve their interests.<br />
>> &#8230;.<br />
>> By late 1931, conservatism as a movement was dead, and the time was<br />
>> coming when Hindenburg and the Reichswehr would drop Brüning and come<br />
>> to terms with Hugenberg and Hitler.<br />
><br />
> Conservatism never works. The end either brings Hitler or Somalia.</p>
<p>Somalia was and is a Communist NATION.</p>
<p>Hitler was a result of PRINTING MONEY in the Wiemar Republic, which is<br />
what central Banks do&#8230;.  If the Federal Reserve is the central home of<br />
Conservatives, then it&#8217;s time for Liberals to shut it down and also shut<br />
down the Federal Reserves partners in crime, Fannie AND Freddie&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/05/09/from-conservative-to-hitler/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Donald Trump Wants to Know How a  Obama Got into the Harvard&#8230;by way of social advancement based on ethnicity?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/05/04/donald-trump-wants-to-know-how-a-obama-got-into-the-harvard-by-way-of-social-advancement-based-on-ethnicity-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/05/04/donald-trump-wants-to-know-how-a-obama-got-into-the-harvard-by-way-of-social-advancement-based-on-ethnicity-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 17:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PDT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Sat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=20162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 5/3/2011 11:34 PM, RichTravsky wrote: > CB wrote: >> On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 20:19:51 -0700 (PDT), T&#038;*$?%y >> wrote: >>> On Apr 27, 3:17 pm, CB wrote: >>>> On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 04:08:58 -0700 (PDT), The PHANTOM >>>> wrote: >>>>> On Apr 27, 5:48 am, Phlip wrote: >>>>>> On Apr 27, 3:23 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 5/3/2011 11:34 PM, RichTravsky wrote:<br />
> CB wrote:<br />
>> On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 20:19:51 -0700 (PDT), <acronym title="Tim Crowley"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> T&*$?%y</span></acronym><br />
>> <timmyturmoil @gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>>> On Apr 27, 3:17 pm, CB <c ...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:<br />
>>>> On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 04:08:58 -0700 (PDT), The PHANTOM<br />
>>>> <burtonu ...@gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>>>>> On Apr 27, 5:48 am, Phlip
<phlip2 ...@gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>>>>>> On Apr 27, 3:23 am, CB <c ...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:<br />
>>>><br />
>>>>>>> Asking how Obama got into Harvard is a legitimate question. Especially<br />
>>>>>>> when we know he&#8217;s the poster boy of politically correct social<br />
>>>>>>> advancement.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>>>> He didn&#8217;t specify his ethnicity on the application papers.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Why? Isn&#8217;t he proud of being&#8230;<br />
>>>><br />
>>>>>> Bush, by contrast, got in as a legacy, and scored significantly lower<br />
>>>>>> grades due to endless partying&#8230;<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Bush got an MBA and HIS economy rocked! right up until Gore tried to<br />
>>>> steal the election<br />
>>>><br />
>>>>> OK, Fillup. Can you tell us who PAID for Obomba&#8217;s Harvard education??<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> I bet we did<br />
>>><br />
>>> Prove it, cowardly <acronym title="fucker"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> f&*$?%r</span></acronym><br />
>><br />
>> Make me, nigger<br />
>><br />
>> Your low life, vulgar language reveals you as an angry nigger.<br />
>><br />
>> Your hatred must be eating you up inside, your posts reveal it.<br />
>><br />
>> NOTE:<br />
>> My use of the word &#8216;nigger&#8217; is of a character description. In no way<br />
>> do I use the word to disparage Black people. When I use &#8220;nigger&#8221; to<br />
>> describe low down and ugly people I refer to Webster&#8217;s Dictionary<br />
>> before the age of Political Correctness, around 1978. Nigger described<br />
>> low down and ugly people and that&#8217;s how I use it with people who post<br />
>> &#8216;vulgarity&#8217;. Look up that word.NOTE:<br />
>> My use of the word &#8216;nigger&#8217; is of a character description. In no way<br />
>> do I use the word to disparage Black people. When I use &#8220;nigger&#8221; to<br />
>> describe low down and ugly people I refer to Webster&#8217;s Dictionary<br />
>> before the age of Political Correctness, around 1978. Nigger described<br />
>> low down and ugly people and that&#8217;s how I use it with people who post<br />
>> &#8216;vulgarity&#8217;. Look up that word.<br />
><br />
> The inner hatred of CB:<br />
><br />
>  <a href="http://www.ferris.edu/news/jimcrow/caricature/" >http://www.ferris.edu/news/jimcrow/caricature/</a><br />
>  &#8230;<br />
>  The etymology of nigger is often traced to the Latin niger, meaning<br />
>  black. The Latin niger became the noun negro (black person) in English,<br />
>  and simply the color black in Spanish and Portuguese. In Early Modern<br />
>  French niger became negre and, later, negress (black woman) was clearly<br />
>  a part of lexical history. One can compare to negre the derogatory<br />
>  nigger and earlier English variants such as negar, neegar, neger, and<br />
>  niggor which developed into a parallel lexico-semantic reality in<br />
>  English. It is likely that nigger is a phonetic spelling of the white<br />
>  Southern mispronunciation of Negro. Whatever its origins, by the early<br />
>  1800s it was firmly established as a denigrative epithet. Almost two<br />
>  centuries later, it remains a chief symbol of white racism.<br />
>  &#8230;</p>
<p>You mistakenly suggest that a word is an emotion&#8230;.  the word is only<br />
derogatory if you dislike the person you describe with it.  On the other<br />
hand, today&#8217;s blacks use the same word as a symbol of kinship and<br />
affection&#8230;..   So the fact that someone is a different color doesn&#8217;t<br />
automatically make the term denigration of another person.  If you think<br />
it does, then you would be the racist.</p>
<p>If you grew up using the term as some use &#8220;sister&#8221; or  Nanny or any<br />
other term that applies to someone you remember, it may well be an<br />
endearing term or just a familiar term that describes a person or their<br />
status within your life.</p>
<p>People called me by my last name in school and it was funny that I could<br />
always tell who liked me and who was insulting me, mostly by the<br />
inflection of their voice when they used my name&#8230;.  Some would<br />
exaggerate parts of the name and others just because it was easy to<br />
remember a slight twist of the name.</p>
<p>So it&#8217;s NOT the word it&#8217;s the person and their particular feeling<br />
towards the reason for the word. My name was never a denigrating word,<br />
at least NOT to me and only some that chose to sneer and snarl and use<br />
it with sarcasm that made it anything near contempt and denigration.</p>
<p>In *Liberalish* you have made some words into dirty words and taken<br />
dirty words like <acronym title="FUCK"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> F&*$?%K</span></acronym> and made them into everyday words&#8230;.  The Problem<br />
with Liberalish is that the rules are NOT consistent and the whole<br />
language is for the ignorant that need outcome based fairness like<br />
Social Justice is supposed to provide.</p>
<p>Rather than having equal opportunity for earning respect,<br />
*Social Justice* seeks to force respect to be the end result through<br />
language and laws that force us to conform.  Good Luck with that!</p>
<p></c></phlip2></burtonu></c></timmyturmoil></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/05/04/donald-trump-wants-to-know-how-a-obama-got-into-the-harvard-by-way-of-social-advancement-based-on-ethnicity-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Ron Paul turning wimpy on illegal immigration?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/30/is-ron-paul-turning-wimpy-on-illegal-immigration/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/30/is-ron-paul-turning-wimpy-on-illegal-immigration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 18:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=19994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[> > > &#8220;Iconoclast&#8221; wrote in message > news:ce12eaa8-4bf4-4fa8-89ae-7b600af2d169 @&#038;*$?%t19g2000prd.googlegroups.com&#8230; > > On Apr 30, 9:05 am, &#8220; J&#038;*$?%a&#8221; wrote: >> Does anyone have a solution to the illegal immigration problem? If you >> believe there is a solution, what is the solution? >> And give America back to Americans Reducing regulations is primary since [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>><br />
><br />
> &#8220;Iconoclast&#8221;  wrote in message<br />
> news:ce12eaa8-4bf4-4fa8-89ae-7b600af2d169<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>t19g2000prd.googlegroups.com&#8230;<br />
><br />
> On Apr 30, 9:05 am, &#8220;<acronym title="Jerry Okamura"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> J&*$?%a</span></acronym>&#8221; <okamuraj ...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:<br />
>> Does anyone have a solution to the illegal immigration problem?  If you<br />
>> believe there is a solution, what is the solution?<br />
>></p>
<p>And give America back to Americans</p>
<p>Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression.</p>
<p>End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
prostitutes when there are so many legal tax paying prostitutes out there?</p>
<p><a href="http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs--crime-usage-falls" >http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs&#8211;crime-usage-falls</a></p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED<br />
money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad. All electronic money leaving the USA would be debited the<br />
Sales tax when the money is sent/spent.</p>
<p>The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drug smuggling less*<br />
*profitable* as would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL<br />
“NEW ITEM” SALES TAX *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE<br />
DRUG DEALERS and illegals by making their tax free money leaving the<br />
country even more valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the RED money<br />
for GREEN money then you would charge the sales tax at that point.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.stansberryresearch.com/pro/1011PSISBBVD/PPSIM280/PR" >http://www.stansberryresearch.com/pro/1011PSISBBVD/PPSIM280/PR</a></p>
<p>Have the States Ratify an amendment withdrawing the 16th amendment&#8230;<br />
Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (Federal sales<br />
tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED TAX* with the same amendment that<br />
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a Federal *NEW ITEM* sales tax.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
*GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add to<br />
the amendment that if congress raises sales tax by 1% they are forced to<br />
cut every single expenditure of the government by 3%.</p>
<p>Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
of our military bases along the southern Border to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the Border patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
Federal trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases.</p>
<p>This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
outside the USA. That will make it harder for smugglers to get money out<br />
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch smugglers. We<br />
are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
borrow like income tax does.</p>
<p>This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less welfare and charge them<br />
tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>Pass an amendment to the constitution that makes all<br />
*laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.</p>
<p>There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. And a<br />
constitutional amendment to limit the Interstate Commerce Clause. The<br />
politicians use that clause to justify all sorts of socialist <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>. The<br />
founding fathers never meant for it to be so broadly applied. Limit it<br />
with an amendment, so government can&#8217;t justify every crazy Socialist<br />
idea by saying its legal under the interstate commerce clause.</p>
<p>Pass another amendment creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP CONGRESS FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING MONEY. The way to limit<br />
some of the Presidents spending is to put an amendment in the<br />
constitution, and limit the Executive branch to 1% of the Nations income<br />
for foreign aid. That should reduce the Presidents buying of other<br />
Nations &#8220;friendship&#8221;.</p>
<p>To quit filling the jails with people over *social taboos* , we need to<br />
take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;social engineer&#8221; the businesses or the<br />
private people by removing the governments use of IRS tax code to<br />
manipulate people. Getting rid of the Income tax and IRS as suggested<br />
above will do that.</p>
<p>Government needs to spend 10% less every year until they meet the<br />
income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
force an across the board spending cap at 20% of GDP and then across the<br />
board cuts on the government spending, to include a law in our TAX<br />
amendment to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
federal sales tax increase would result in automatic spending cuts using<br />
a baseline of 10% taxes.</p>
<p>And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
them fight their own fights. We also need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
committing(fewer laws), we need fewer police and prisons to support&#8230;.<br />
and the above drug and tax plan, will reduce police and prison needs by<br />
at least that 10% that this plan suggested cutting each year.</p>
<p>NO welfare to corporations, and cut welfare to private people by 10%<br />
each year until it is 10% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
in DEEP for a long time.</p>
<p></okamuraj></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/30/is-ron-paul-turning-wimpy-on-illegal-immigration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Donald Trump Wants to Know How a Obama Got into the Harvard&#8230;by way of social advancement based on ethnicity?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/27/donald-trump-wants-to-know-how-a-obama-got-into-the-harvard-by-way-of-social-advancement-based-on-ethnicity/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/27/donald-trump-wants-to-know-how-a-obama-got-into-the-harvard-by-way-of-social-advancement-based-on-ethnicity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 16:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PDT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lisa Lisa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Tue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=19884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/27/2011 6:23 AM, CB wrote: > On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:45:52 -0700 (PDT), Nickname unavailable > wrote: > >> On Apr 26, 11:30 pm, Lisa Lisa wrote: >> >> >> lisa, >> the real problem is a president that is so worthless, so meek, timid, >> indecisive, lied so many times, has caved [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/27/2011 6:23 AM, CB wrote:<br />
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:45:52 -0700 (PDT), Nickname unavailable<br />
> <video61 @tcq.net> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> On Apr 26, 11:30 pm, Lisa Lisa <harryharr ...@yahoo.com> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> lisa,<br />
>> the real problem is a president that is so worthless, so meek, timid,<br />
>> indecisive, lied so many times, has caved in so many times, that he is<br />
>> no longer viewed as a credible strong leader. that opens the door to<br />
>> the demagogues.<br />
><br />
><br />
> Asking how Obama got into Harvard is a legitimate question. Especially<br />
> when we know he&#8217;s the poster boy of politically correct social<br />
> advancement.</p>
<p>Combined with the fact that Obama is the *HARVARD VILLAGE IDIOT* we see<br />
more and more that Obama hasn&#8217;t got what it takes to have accomplished<br />
what he claims to have personally done&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>Who paid for Obama&#8217;s college and where are his achievements while he was<br />
in college, a picture of him actually in the glee club or something? Why<br />
no published papers or grades supporting his &#8220;genius&#8221; it&#8217;s like he was<br />
hiding and showed up only enough to get bogus grades that were bought by<br />
some Marxist benefactor from their hand picked Marxist professors.</p>
<p></harryharr></video61></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/27/donald-trump-wants-to-know-how-a-obama-got-into-the-harvard-by-way-of-social-advancement-based-on-ethnicity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oppose the Christian Coalition&#8217;s Campaign to Kill Women</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/26/oppose-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-kill-women-85/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/26/oppose-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-kill-women-85/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=19828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/26/2011 12:24 AM, Ray Fischer wrote: > Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: >> On 4/25/2011 2:06 AM, Ray Fischer wrote: >>> Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: >>>> On 4/23/2011 7:07 PM, Ray Fischer wrote: >>>>> Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: >>>>>> On 4/15/2011 12:09 PM, Bob LeChevalier wrote: >>>>>>> Beam Me Up Scotty >>>>>>> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/26/2011 12:24 AM, Ray Fischer wrote:<br />
> Beam Me Up Scotty
<then -Destroy-Everything<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote:<br />
>> On 4/25/2011 2:06 AM, Ray Fischer wrote:<br />
>>> Beam Me Up Scotty  </then>
<then -Destroy-Everything<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote:<br />
>>>> On 4/23/2011 7:07 PM, Ray Fischer wrote:<br />
>>>>> Beam Me Up Scotty  </then>
<then -Destroy-Everything<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote:<br />
>>>>>> On 4/15/2011 12:09 PM, Bob LeChevalier wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> Beam Me Up Scotty </then>
<then -Destroy-Everything<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Blackhole.NebulaX.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>> On 4/14/2011 8:17 AM, Bob LeChevalier wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>> Beam Me Up Scotty </then>
<then -Destroy-Everything<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Blackhole.NebulaX.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> Alas, you did not pose the question as a constitutional one.  (Good<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> thing, because the USSC has already ruled abortion as legal on the<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> constitutional issue.)<br />
>>>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>> They also said via Dred/Scott that Slavery is legal and right.<br />
>>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> Actually, the Dred Scott decision did not say that.  Slavery was<br />
>>>>>>>>> already legal, and continued to be until the 13th amendment was<br />
>>>>>>>>> ratified.<br />
>>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>> It took congress and an amendment to correct that.<br />
>>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> That is what amendments are for.<br />
>>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> But I wouldn&#8217;t hold my breath waiting for an constitutional amendment<br />
>>>>>>>>> that makes fetuses &#8220;persons&#8221; having the same rights as those who are<br />
>>>>>>>>> born, if I were you.<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> NONE is needed, the person in the uterus is a de`facto person<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> No, it isn&#8217;t.<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> since no where does the constitution say that human life in the uterus is NOT a<br />
>>>>>>>> person.<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> Nowhere does it say that my cat or my imaginary pet rock is NOT a<br />
>>>>>>> person.  Nor does it say that dead people are NOT persons, even though<br />
>>>>>>> they clearly were persons when they were alive.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> There is no &#8220;test&#8221; for what a person is that is written into the<br />
>>>>>> constitution as there is for citizen&#8230;..  That doesn&#8217;t mean you get to<br />
>>>>>> make up the definition of &#8220;person&#8221; or ignore the definition that the<br />
>>>>>> writers used.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> 99.8% on the irony meter<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>>> Since it doesn&#8217;t say that, we look at the general definition of &#8220;person&#8221;<br />
>>>>>> used by those writing this document for We The People.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> We find that an &#8220;Individual human life&#8221; is a person.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> And a fetus is not an individual.  It&#8217;s part of a pregnant woman.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Where is &#8220;a fetus is not an individual&#8221; in the constitution?<br />
>>><br />
>>> Gesundheit.<br />
>>><br />
>>>> Until that says it&#8230;.   Nothing else matters.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Certainly not your repeated lies.<br />
>><br />
>> All you need is an amendment to the constitution to create the power you<br />
>> want to kill babies.<br />
><br />
> I want no such power, pro-liar.  The fact remains that you misogynist<br />
> creeps have no justification for enslaving and killing women.<br />
></p>
<p>You used that argument against Republicans wanting to cut social<br />
programs:  *please select a new talking point*</p>
</then>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/26/oppose-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-kill-women-85/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Futile and Immoral</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/22/futile-and-immoral/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/22/futile-and-immoral/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 20:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PDT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[increased]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=19738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/22/2011 4:19 PM, Cassandra wrote: > On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 04:34:43 -0700 (PDT), RH > wrote: > >> Drug Control: Futile and Immoral >> Robert Henderson >> >> During the nineteenth century, the period of Britain=92s greatest power, >> comparative wealth and influence, drugs were freely available: at >> first hashish and opium [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/22/2011 4:19 PM, Cassandra wrote:<br />
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 04:34:43 -0700 (PDT), RH <anywhere156 @gmail.com><br />
> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> Drug Control: Futile and Immoral<br />
>> Robert Henderson<br />
>><br />
>> During the nineteenth century, the period of Britain=92s greatest power,<br />
>> comparative wealth and influence, drugs were freely available: at<br />
>> first hashish and opium in various forms, followed by cocaine,<br />
>> morphine and heroin in the latter part of the period.  Not only did<br />
>> the world not collapse and the country fall to ruin, Britain prospered<br />
>> greatly: GDP in 1900 was approximately ten times what it was in 1800,<br />
>> the population increased fourfold, social disorder decreased, the<br />
>> political franchise was considerably broadened, industrialisation<br />
>> proceeded apace and the Empire increased to become the only world<br />
>> empire ever worthy of the name.<br />
>><br />
>> Today we live in a country in which it is generally accepted that drug<br />
>> taking ranging from hashish to heroin is widespread despite drugs<br />
>> being illegal, expensive, difficult to obtain and of uncertain<br />
>> quality.  Yet even in these difficult financial times, Britain has the<br />
>> fifth or sixth  largest economy in the world, people are living ever<br />
>> longer and the general health and prosperity of the population is much<br />
>> improved and still improving and growing.  Drug taking now is self-<br />
>> evidently not going to bring society down or even seriously incommode<br />
>> it.<br />
>><br />
> Victorian London was of course a paradise where crime, drunkeness,<br />
> social unrest and child prostitution never happened.<br />
></p>
<p>And Prohibition in the USA decreased crime&#8230;..  NOT a chance.</p>
<p>At the end of Prohibition there were more bar-stools and more criminals<br />
in jails.</p>
<p></anywhere156></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/22/futile-and-immoral/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Join the Christian Coalition&#8217;s Campaign to Stop Taxpayer Funding for Abortion</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/20/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-51/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/20/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-51/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 22:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deep Dudu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Thu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=19638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/20/2011 6:19 PM, Scout wrote: > Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: >> On 4/15/2011 8:50 AM, P&#038;*$?%s wrote: >>> On 4/14/2011 7:06 PM, Deep Dudu wrote: >>>> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 18:51:25 -0700, P&#038;*$?%s >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 4/14/2011 2:15 PM, Deep Dudu wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:00:29 -0700, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/20/2011 6:19 PM, Scout wrote:<br />
> Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:<br />
>> On 4/15/2011 8:50 AM, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym> wrote:<br />
>>> On 4/14/2011 7:06 PM, Deep Dudu wrote:<br />
>>>> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 18:51:25 -0700, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym><none @none.com><br />
>>>> wrote:<br />
>>>><br />
>>>>> On 4/14/2011 2:15 PM, Deep Dudu wrote:<br />
>>>>>> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:00:29 -0700, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym></none><none @none.com><br />
>>>>>> wrote:<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> The services are there, you just don&#8217;t want to pay for it.<br />
>>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> Are you familiar with the concept of &#8216;personal responsibility&#8217;?<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> Are you familiar with the concept of being a human being?<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> Quite an ironic response, when you think about it.<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> You advocate socialist services for human beings (&#8216;free&#8217; family<br />
>>>>>>> planning), but at the same time, advocate the violent and bloody<br />
>>>>>>> shredding to death of human beings (abortion).<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> How do you reconcile that dichotomy?<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> It&#8217;s not  up to me to decide what a woman can or can&#8217;t do with her<br />
>>>>>> body.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> That&#8217;s right.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> And it is also not up to you to decide if a fetus is ripped to<br />
>>>>> shreds either.  Nor is it the woman&#8217;s choice.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Of course it is her choice.  It&#8217;s her body.  You claiming now the<br />
>>>> government has the right to decide everything you can do with your<br />
>>>> body?   Y<br />
>>>><br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>>> The law does not have the right to force a woman to carry a<br />
>>>>>> preganancy to term is she doesn&#8217;t want to.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> So, what about the rights of the unborn?  Who protects those?<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>> A fetus is not a person.  it is a part of the woman.  It is not a<br />
>>>> person until it is born live and viable.<br />
><br />
><br />
> Which of these speific definitions state that a fetus is a person?<br />
></p>
<p>HUMAN BEING:<br />
1.	human beinghuman being &#8211; *any living or extinct* member of the<br />
family Hominidae characterized by superior intelligence, articulate<br />
speech, and erect carriage</p>
<p>>> *PERSON*<br />
>> 1. *a human being* , whether man, woman, or child: The table seats four<br />
>> persons.<br />
>><br />
>> 2. *a human being* as distinguished from an animal or a thing.<br />
>><br />
>> 3. Sociology . *an individual human being* , especially with reference to<br />
>> his or her social relationships and behavioral patterns as conditioned<br />
>> by the culture.<br />
>><br />
>> 4. Philosophy . a self-conscious or rational being.<br />
>><br />
>> 5. the actual self or individual personality  of *a human being* : You<br />
>> ought not to generalize, but to consider the person you are dealing<br />
>> with.<br />
>><br />
>> 6. the body of *a living human being* , sometimes including the clothes<br />
>> being worn: He had no money on his person.<br />
>><br />
>> 7. the body in its external aspect: an attractive person to look at.<br />
>><br />
>> 8. a character, part, or role, as in a play or story.<br />
>><br />
>> 9. an individual of distinction or importance.<br />
>><br />
>> 10. a person not entitled to social recognition or respect.<br />
>><br />
>> 11. Law . *a human being* (natural person)  or a group of human beings,<br />
>> a corporation, a partnership, an estate, or other legal entity<br />
>> (artificial person or  juristic person)  recognized by law as having<br />
>> rights and duties.<br />
>><br />
>> 12. Grammar . a category found in many languages that is used to<br />
>> distinguish between the speaker of an utterance and those to or about<br />
>> whom he or she is speaking. In English there are three persons in the<br />
>> pronouns, the first represented by I  and we,  the second by you,  and<br />
>> the third by he, she, it,  and they.  Most verbs have distinct third<br />
>> person  singular forms in the present tense, as writes;  the verb be<br />
>> has, in addition, a first person  singular form am.<br />
>><br />
>> 13. Theology . any of the three hypostases or modes of being in the<br />
>> trinity, namely the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost.<br />
>> —Idioms<br />
>><br />
>> 14. be one&#8217;s own person, to be free from restrictions, control, or<br />
>> dictatorial influence: Now that she&#8217;s working, she feels that she&#8217;s<br />
>> her own person.<br />
>><br />
>> 15. in person, in one&#8217;s own bodily presence; personally: Applicants<br />
>> are requested to apply in person.<br />
><br />
></p>
<p></none></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/20/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-51/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oppose the Christian Coalition&#8217;s Campaign to Kill Women</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/20/oppose-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-kill-women-79/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/20/oppose-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-kill-women-79/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 21:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=19636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/15/2011 2:06 AM, Ray Fischer wrote: > Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: >> On 4/13/2011 11:56 PM, Ray Fischer wrote: >>> Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: >>>> On 4/12/2011 4:18 AM, Ray Fischer wrote: >>>>> Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: >>>>>> On 4/10/2011 9:06 PM, Bob LeChevalier wrote: >>>>>>> Beam Me Up Scotty >>>>>>> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/15/2011 2:06 AM, Ray Fischer wrote:<br />
> Beam Me Up Scotty
<then -Destroy-Everything<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote:<br />
>> On 4/13/2011 11:56 PM, Ray Fischer wrote:<br />
>>> Beam Me Up Scotty  </then>
<then -Destroy-Everything<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote:<br />
>>>> On 4/12/2011 4:18 AM, Ray Fischer wrote:<br />
>>>>> Beam Me Up Scotty  </then>
<then -Destroy-Everything<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote:<br />
>>>>>> On 4/10/2011 9:06 PM, Bob LeChevalier wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> Beam Me Up Scotty </then>
<then -Destroy-Everything<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Blackhole.NebulaX.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>> You&#8217;re one of those right-wing fascists who has the delusional belief<br />
>>>>>>>>> that you get to speak for people you don&#8217;t know and have never met.<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> You mean speak for the baby right?<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> Sure I speak up for the person in the uterus&#8230;  just as I might speak<br />
>>>>>>>> up for women or slaves.  They all deserve to be heard as they are all<br />
>>>>>>>> persons and the 14th amendment says so.<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> No.  The 14th amendment says nothing explicit about who is a person.<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> &#8220;1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject<br />
>>>>>>> to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of<br />
>>>>>>> the State wherein they reside&#8221;<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> It says that a person BORN in this country is a citizen (or<br />
>>>>>>> naturalized).  Thus, no fetus is a citizen.  It also implies that<br />
>>>>>>> someone is not a person until born.  The qualifications for president<br />
>>>>>>> also refer to being a natural-BORN citizen.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> If a Person can be born or naturalized(in the USA) then they had to be a<br />
>>>>>> person before they were born or naturalized.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> Wrong.  They could have been born elsewhere.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Born elsewhere makes them a person before they&#8217;re Naturalized in the USA.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Yes, being born makes them a person.  You&#8217;re starting to catch on.<br />
>><br />
>> That was to make sure you understand they aren&#8217;t a citizen&#8230;.<br />
><br />
> Citizenship isn&#8217;t relevant.<br />
><br />
>> but they<br />
>> are a person whenever they are in the USA &#8220;born or unborn&#8221;,<br />
><br />
> You&#8217;re lying.<br />
></p>
<p>*Human Being*<br />
1.	human beinghuman being &#8211; *any living or extinct* member of the<br />
family Hominidae characterized by superior intelligence, articulate<br />
speech, and erect carriage</p>
<p>*PERSON*<br />
1.<br />
*a human being* , whether man, woman, or child: The table seats four<br />
persons.<br />
2.<br />
a human being as distinguished from an animal or a thing.<br />
3.<br />
Sociology . an individual human being, especially with reference to his<br />
or her social relationships and behavioral patterns as conditioned by<br />
the culture.<br />
4.<br />
Philosophy . a self-conscious or rational being.<br />
5.<br />
the actual self or individual personality  of a human being: You ought<br />
not to generalize, but to consider the person you are dealing with.<br />
6.<br />
the body of a living human being, sometimes including the clothes being<br />
worn: He had no money on his person.<br />
7.<br />
the body in its external aspect: an attractive person to look at.<br />
8.<br />
a character, part, or role, as in a play or story.<br />
9.<br />
an individual of distinction or importance.<br />
10.<br />
a person not entitled to social recognition or respect.<br />
11.<br />
Law . *a human being* (natural person)  or a group of human beings, a<br />
corporation, a partnership, an estate, or other legal entity (artificial<br />
person or  juristic person)  recognized by law as having rights and duties.<br />
12.<br />
Grammar . a category found in many languages that is used to distinguish<br />
between the speaker of an utterance and those to or about whom he or she<br />
is speaking. In English there are three persons in the pronouns, the<br />
first represented by I  and we,  the second by you,  and the third by<br />
he, she, it,  and they.  Most verbs have distinct third person  singular<br />
forms in the present tense, as writes;  the verb be  has, in addition, a<br />
first person  singular form am.<br />
13.<br />
Theology . any of the three hypostases or modes of being in the trinity,<br />
namely the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost.<br />
—Idioms<br />
14.<br />
be one&#8217;s own person, to be free from restrictions, control, or<br />
dictatorial influence: Now that she&#8217;s working, she feels that she&#8217;s her<br />
own person.<br />
15.<br />
in person, in one&#8217;s own bodily presence; personally: Applicants are<br />
requested to apply in person.</p>
</then>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/20/oppose-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-kill-women-79/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oppose the Christian Coalition&#8217;s Campaign to Kill Women</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/20/oppose-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-kill-women-77/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/20/oppose-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-kill-women-77/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 21:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=19630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/15/2011 2:06 AM, Ray Fischer wrote: > Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: >> On 4/13/2011 11:56 PM, Ray Fischer wrote: >>> Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: >>>> On 4/12/2011 4:18 AM, Ray Fischer wrote: >>>>> Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: >>>>>> On 4/10/2011 9:06 PM, Bob LeChevalier wrote: >>>>>>> Beam Me Up Scotty >>>>>>> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/15/2011 2:06 AM, Ray Fischer wrote:<br />
> Beam Me Up Scotty
<then -Destroy-Everything<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote:<br />
>> On 4/13/2011 11:56 PM, Ray Fischer wrote:<br />
>>> Beam Me Up Scotty  </then>
<then -Destroy-Everything<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote:<br />
>>>> On 4/12/2011 4:18 AM, Ray Fischer wrote:<br />
>>>>> Beam Me Up Scotty  </then>
<then -Destroy-Everything<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote:<br />
>>>>>> On 4/10/2011 9:06 PM, Bob LeChevalier wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> Beam Me Up Scotty </then>
<then -Destroy-Everything<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Blackhole.NebulaX.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>> You&#8217;re one of those right-wing fascists who has the delusional belief<br />
>>>>>>>>> that you get to speak for people you don&#8217;t know and have never met.<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> You mean speak for the baby right?<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> Sure I speak up for the person in the uterus&#8230;  just as I might speak<br />
>>>>>>>> up for women or slaves.  They all deserve to be heard as they are all<br />
>>>>>>>> persons and the 14th amendment says so.<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> No.  The 14th amendment says nothing explicit about who is a person.<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> &#8220;1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject<br />
>>>>>>> to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of<br />
>>>>>>> the State wherein they reside&#8221;<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> It says that a person BORN in this country is a citizen (or<br />
>>>>>>> naturalized).  Thus, no fetus is a citizen.  It also implies that<br />
>>>>>>> someone is not a person until born.  The qualifications for president<br />
>>>>>>> also refer to being a natural-BORN citizen.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> If a Person can be born or naturalized(in the USA) then they had to be a<br />
>>>>>> person before they were born or naturalized.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> Wrong.  They could have been born elsewhere.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Born elsewhere makes them a person before they&#8217;re Naturalized in the USA.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Yes, being born makes them a person.  You&#8217;re starting to catch on.<br />
>><br />
>> That was to make sure you understand they aren&#8217;t a citizen&#8230;.<br />
><br />
> Citizenship isn&#8217;t relevant.<br />
><br />
>> but they<br />
>> are a person whenever they are in the USA &#8220;born or unborn&#8221;,<br />
><br />
> You&#8217;re lying.<br />
><br />
1.<br />
a human being, whether man, woman, or child: The table seats four persons.<br />
2.<br />
a human being as distinguished from an animal or a thing.<br />
3.<br />
Sociology . an individual human being, especially with reference to his<br />
or her social relationships and behavioral patterns as conditioned by<br />
the culture.<br />
4.<br />
Philosophy . a self-conscious or rational being.<br />
5.<br />
the actual self or individual personality  of a human being: You ought<br />
not to generalize, but to consider the person you are dealing with.<br />
6.<br />
the body of a living human being, sometimes including the clothes being<br />
worn: He had no money on his person.<br />
7.<br />
the body in its external aspect: an attractive person to look at.<br />
8.<br />
a character, part, or role, as in a play or story.<br />
9.<br />
an individual of distinction or importance.<br />
10.<br />
a person not entitled to social recognition or respect.<br />
11.<br />
Law . a human being (natural person)  or a group of human beings, a<br />
corporation, a partnership, an estate, or other legal entity (artificial<br />
person or  juristic person)  recognized by law as having rights and duties.<br />
12.<br />
Grammar . a category found in many languages that is used to distinguish<br />
between the speaker of an utterance and those to or about whom he or she<br />
is speaking. In English there are three persons in the pronouns, the<br />
first represented by I  and we,  the second by you,  and the third by<br />
he, she, it,  and they.  Most verbs have distinct third person  singular<br />
forms in the present tense, as writes;  the verb be  has, in addition, a<br />
first person  singular form am.<br />
13.<br />
Theology . any of the three hypostases or modes of being in the trinity,<br />
namely the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost.<br />
—Idioms<br />
14.<br />
be one&#8217;s own person, to be free from restrictions, control, or<br />
dictatorial influence: Now that she&#8217;s working, she feels that she&#8217;s her<br />
own person.<br />
15.<br />
in person, in one&#8217;s own bodily presence; personally: Applicants are<br />
requested to apply in person.</p>
</then>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/20/oppose-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-kill-women-77/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Join the Christian Coalition&#8217;s Campaign to Stop Taxpayer Funding for Abortion</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/20/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-50/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/20/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-50/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 21:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deep Dudu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Thu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=19628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/15/2011 8:50 AM, P&#038;*$?%s wrote: > On 4/14/2011 7:06 PM, Deep Dudu wrote: >> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 18:51:25 -0700, P&#038;*$?%s >> wrote: >> >>> On 4/14/2011 2:15 PM, Deep Dudu wrote: >>>> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:00:29 -0700, P&#038;*$?%s >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>>> The services are there, you just don&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/15/2011 8:50 AM, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym> wrote:<br />
> On 4/14/2011 7:06 PM, Deep Dudu wrote:<br />
>> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 18:51:25 -0700, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym><none @none.com><br />
>> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>> On 4/14/2011 2:15 PM, Deep Dudu wrote:<br />
>>>> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:00:29 -0700, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym></none><none @none.com><br />
>>>> wrote:<br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>>>>> The services are there, you just don&#8217;t want to pay for it.<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> Are you familiar with the concept of &#8216;personal responsibility&#8217;?<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> Are you familiar with the concept of being a human being?<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> Quite an ironic response, when you think about it.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> You advocate socialist services for human beings (&#8216;free&#8217; family<br />
>>>>> planning), but at the same time, advocate the violent and bloody<br />
>>>>> shredding to death of human beings (abortion).<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> How do you reconcile that dichotomy?<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> It&#8217;s not  up to me to decide what a woman can or can&#8217;t do with her<br />
>>>> body.<br />
>>><br />
>>> That&#8217;s right.<br />
>>><br />
>>> And it is also not up to you to decide if a fetus is ripped to shreds<br />
>>> either.  Nor is it the woman&#8217;s choice.<br />
>><br />
>> Of course it is her choice.  It&#8217;s her body.  You claiming now the<br />
>> government has the right to decide everything you can do with your<br />
>> body?   Y<br />
>><br />
>>><br />
>>>> The law does not have the right to force a woman to carry a<br />
>>>> preganancy to term is she doesn&#8217;t want to.<br />
>>><br />
>>> So, what about the rights of the unborn?  Who protects those?<br />
>>><br />
>> A fetus is not a person.  it is a part of the woman.  It is not a<br />
>> person until it is born live and viable.</p>
<p>*PERSON*<br />
1. a human being, whether man, woman, or child: The table seats four<br />
persons.</p>
<p>2. a human being as distinguished from an animal or a thing.</p>
<p>3. Sociology . an individual human being, especially with reference to<br />
his or her social relationships and behavioral patterns as conditioned<br />
by the culture.</p>
<p>4. Philosophy . a self-conscious or rational being.</p>
<p>5. the actual self or individual personality  of a human being: You<br />
ought not to generalize, but to consider the person you are dealing with.</p>
<p>6. the body of a living human being, sometimes including the clothes<br />
being worn: He had no money on his person.</p>
<p>7. the body in its external aspect: an attractive person to look at.</p>
<p>8. a character, part, or role, as in a play or story.</p>
<p>9. an individual of distinction or importance.</p>
<p>10. a person not entitled to social recognition or respect.</p>
<p>11. Law . a human being (natural person)  or a group of human beings, a<br />
corporation, a partnership, an estate, or other legal entity (artificial<br />
person or  juristic person)  recognized by law as having rights and duties.</p>
<p>12. Grammar . a category found in many languages that is used to<br />
distinguish between the speaker of an utterance and those to or about<br />
whom he or she is speaking. In English there are three persons in the<br />
pronouns, the first represented by I  and we,  the second by you,  and<br />
the third by he, she, it,  and they.  Most verbs have distinct third<br />
person  singular forms in the present tense, as writes;  the verb be<br />
has, in addition, a first person  singular form am.</p>
<p>13. Theology . any of the three hypostases or modes of being in the<br />
trinity, namely the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost.<br />
—Idioms</p>
<p>14. be one&#8217;s own person, to be free from restrictions, control, or<br />
dictatorial influence: Now that she&#8217;s working, she feels that she&#8217;s her<br />
own person.</p>
<p>15. in person, in one&#8217;s own bodily presence; personally: Applicants are<br />
requested to apply in person.</p>
<p></none></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/20/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-50/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anchor babies are 100% legal</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/18/anchor-babies-are-100-legal-6/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/18/anchor-babies-are-100-legal-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 18:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=19482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/17/2011 8:17 PM, Josh wrote: > On 4/17/2011 7:17 PM, Charles Bell wrote: >> On Apr 17, 6:32 pm, Josh wrote: >>> On 4/17/2011 6:07 PM, Charles Bell wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Apr 17, 5:10 pm, Josh wrote: >>>>> On 4/17/2011 4:52 PM, Charles Bell wrote: >>> >>>>>> On Apr [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/17/2011 8:17 PM, Josh wrote:<br />
> On 4/17/2011 7:17 PM, Charles Bell wrote:<br />
>> On Apr 17, 6:32 pm, Josh<u ...@nowhere.com>  wrote:<br />
>>> On 4/17/2011 6:07 PM, Charles Bell wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>>> On Apr 17, 5:10 pm, Josh</u><u ...@nowhere.com>    wrote:<br />
>>>>> On 4/17/2011 4:52 PM, Charles Bell wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> On Apr 17, 1:42 pm, Josh</u><u ...@nowhere.com>      wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> On 4/17/2011 10:01 AM, Charles Bell wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>> I never said: each and every decision is &#8220;making law&#8221;  I said the<br />
>>>>>>>>>> principle whereby a court is empowered to go beyond<br />
>>>>>>>>>> interpreting law<br />
>>>>>>>>>> but to strike it down carries with it the possibility of<br />
>>>>>>>>>> making new<br />
>>>>>>>>>> law,<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> Only a &#8220;possibility&#8221;?  Your standard was:<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> &#8220;this law or procedural practice is invalid in whole or in part &#8211;<br />
>>>>>>>>> either replace it to one we prefer or with nothing at all. That is<br />
>>>>>>>>> making law.&#8221;<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>> Which, I stated twice now, is not operational in every case on<br />
>>>>>>>> invalidating law, but certainly on some issues that have disrupting<br />
>>>>>>>> social consequences like abortion and immigration and<br />
>>>>>>>> naturalization.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>> Other than the &#8220;they made a mistake&#8221; exception, in what other<br />
>>>>>>> cases is<br />
>>>>>>> the standard not operational?<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> I never said a &#8220;they made a mistake&#8221; exception is any standard not<br />
>>>>>> operational. [Whatever the heck that means.]  Nor did I say or<br />
>>>>>> mean to<br />
>>>>>> say that in *any* case is a standard not operational.  All that<br />
>>>>>> &#8220;standard&#8221; business is something you have concocted. You refuse to<br />
>>>>>> accept that a recitation on historical facts is objective and<br />
>>>>>> claim it<br />
>>>>>> is somehow subjective opinion.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> I said:  given this action [judical constitutional nullification],<br />
>>>>>> this [making law] may happen. Even likely happen.  That is just<br />
>>>>>> probabilstic causality.  I gave historic examples.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> In that case, we are back to you complaining about the Court &#8220;making<br />
>>>>> law&#8221; without any standard to judge when &#8220;making law&#8221; happens &#8211; in<br />
>>>>> which<br />
>>>>> case you are just giving us a talking point boilerplate.<br />
>>><br />
>>>> No, in any case, you are given to misrepresent the facts in<br />
>>>> disallowing any possibility of there being judicial making of law,<br />
>>>> rather than a restrained, judicious interpretation of law, under any<br />
>>>> circumstances. My standard is indeed an objective observation of the<br />
>>>> facts of reality<br />
>>><br />
>>> You don&#8217;t know the difference between fact and opinion.<br />
>>><br />
>><br />
>> Your refusal to debate anything on matter facts (always, from what I<br />
>> remember) except in mere citation of case law (opinions) indicates<br />
>> that you do not know or care to know the difference between opinion<br />
>> and fact.  Court opinions have consequences and yet you are oblivious<br />
>> to those consequences, the facts of history, as if only the opinions<br />
>> matter &#8212; as exemplified below:<br />
>><br />
>>>> and your standard is . . . what?<br />
>>><br />
>>> In my opinion, Courts never make law when invalidating laws because they<br />
>>> aren&#8217;t writing legislation.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> Then on the matter of Roe v. Wade and Wong Kim Ark what precipitated<br />
>> change in law even though prior to any judicial review there was no<br />
>> consideration of changing law?  What would happen if Congress did not<br />
>> rescind the Chinese Exclusion Act and alter U.S. code on immigration<br />
>> and naturalization or that every state that wanted to continued to ban<br />
>> abortions in any form?<br />
>><br />
>> Did not Wong Kim Ark make new law &#8212; even if it was Congress that<br />
>> wrote the new law &#8212; coerced by the judiciary after not only<br />
>> invalidating The Chinese Exclusion Act but setting a whole new<br />
>> standard on citizenship never expressed through Congress beforehand in<br />
>> any manner, shape, or form (and once, for the opposite purpose, in<br />
>> citizenship for those born abroad), and did not Roe v. Wade create a<br />
>> new right of privacy found no where in the Constitution but on<br />
>> stretching the right against unlawful search and seizure?<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> If you care to opine that the Supreme Court is entitled to its opinion<br />
>> on constitutional matters, but that is the extent of its power, we may<br />
>> be in agreement. Do you think that?  Or is the reality completely<br />
>> different?  What is that different reality?<br />
><br />
> You&#8217;ve made some good points about the Court precipitating legislation<br />
> using my standard.  But, until we have an objective standard for what<br />
> you consider &#8220;making law&#8221;, we can&#8217;t debate which of our standards is<br />
> better.</p>
<p>Anything other than striking down an unconstitutional law would be<br />
making law.</p>
<p>When given the choice of whether a law is constitutional all the courts<br />
can says is &#8220;YES it&#8217;s unconstitutional&#8221;  OR  &#8220;YES it&#8217;s a constitutional law&#8221;</p>
<p>Either way the courts don&#8217;t get to write anything.</p>
<p></u></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/18/anchor-babies-are-100-legal-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservatives should demand 15% decrease in Defense spending.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/13/conservatives-should-demand-15-decrease-in-defense-spending/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/13/conservatives-should-demand-15-decrease-in-defense-spending/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 01:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=19316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/13/2011 6:18 PM, Robert not Roberto wrote: > &#8220;walt tonne&#8221; wrote in message > news:817b185f-dfe2-4e78-a26d-bda7094b15ce @&#038;*$?%a21g2000prj.googlegroups.com&#8230; >> Current levels of spending are obscene. Almost a billion to date in >> Libya, 54 thousand milititary >> in Germany, 35 thousand in South Korea. Thousands scattered around the >> middle east. >> Bring em&#8217; home, put [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/13/2011 6:18 PM, Robert not Roberto wrote:<br />
> &#8220;walt tonne&#8221; <tonnewalt487 @gmail.com> wrote in message<br />
> news:817b185f-dfe2-4e78-a26d-bda7094b15ce<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>a21g2000prj.googlegroups.com&#8230;<br />
>> Current levels of spending are obscene. Almost a billion to date in<br />
>> Libya, 54 thousand milititary<br />
>> in Germany, 35 thousand in South Korea. Thousands scattered around the<br />
>> middle east.<br />
>> Bring em&#8217; home, put 20,000 on the borders. Cheaper to discharge many<br />
>> and put them on unemployment.<br />
><br />
> I&#8217;m a Conservative and I agree with you.  The Republicans would have a lot<br />
> more credibility if they put everything on the chopping block including<br />
> defense.<br />
><br />
></p>
<p>And give America back to Americans</p>
<p>Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression.</p>
<p>End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
prostitutes when there are so many legal tax paying prostitutes out there?</p>
<p><a href="http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs--crime-usage-falls" >http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs&#8211;crime-usage-falls</a></p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED<br />
money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad. All electronic money leaving the USA would be debited the<br />
Sales tax when the money is sent/spent.</p>
<p>The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drug smuggling less*<br />
*profitable* as would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL<br />
“NEW ITEM” SALES TAX *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE<br />
DRUG DEALERS and illegals by making their tax free money leaving the<br />
country even more valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the RED money<br />
for GREEN money then you would charge the sales tax at that point.</p>
<p>Have the States Ratify an amendment withdrawing the 16th amendment&#8230;<br />
Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (Federal sales<br />
tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED TAX* with the same amendment that<br />
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a Federal *NEW ITEM* sales tax.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
*GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add to<br />
the amendment that if congress raises sales tax by 1% they are forced to<br />
cut every single expenditure of the government by 3%.</p>
<p>Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
of our military bases along the southern Border to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the Border patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
Federal trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases.</p>
<p>This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
outside the USA. That will make it harder for smugglers to get money out<br />
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch smugglers. We<br />
are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
borrow like income tax does.</p>
<p>This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less welfare and charge them<br />
tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>Pass an amendment to the constitution that makes all<br />
*laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.</p>
<p>There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. And a<br />
constitutional amendment to limit the Interstate Commerce Clause. The<br />
politicians use that clause to justify all sorts of socialist <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>. The<br />
founding fathers never meant for it to be so broadly applied. Limit it<br />
with an amendment, so government can&#8217;t justify every crazy Socialist<br />
idea by saying its legal under the interstate commerce clause.</p>
<p>Pass another amendment creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP CONGRESS FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING MONEY. The way to limit<br />
some of the Presidents spending is to put an amendment in the<br />
constitution, and limit the Executive branch to 1% of the Nations income<br />
for foreign aid. That should reduce the Presidents buying of other<br />
Nations &#8220;friendship&#8221;.</p>
<p>To quit filling the jails with people over *social taboos* , we need to<br />
take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;social engineer&#8221; the businesses or the<br />
private people by removing the governments use of IRS tax code to<br />
manipulate people. Getting rid of the Income tax and IRS as suggested<br />
above will do that.</p>
<p>Government needs to spend 10% less every year until they meet the<br />
income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
force an across the board spending cap at 20% of GDP and then across the<br />
board cuts on the government spending, to include a law in our TAX<br />
amendment to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
federal sales tax increase would result in automatic spending cuts using<br />
a baseline of 10% taxes.</p>
<p>And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
them fight their own fights. We also need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
committing(fewer laws), we need fewer police and prisons to support&#8230;.<br />
and the above drug and tax plan, will reduce police and prison needs by<br />
at least that 10% that this plan suggested cutting each year.</p>
<p>NO welfare to corporations, and cut welfare to private people by 10%<br />
each year until it is 10% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
in DEEP for a long time.</p>
<p></tonnewalt487></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/13/conservatives-should-demand-15-decrease-in-defense-spending/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anchor babies are 100% legal</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/11/anchor-babies-are-100-legal-3/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/11/anchor-babies-are-100-legal-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 20:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Mon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=19172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/11/2011 4:03 PM, Strabo wrote: > On 4/11/2011 12:36 PM, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: >> On 4/11/2011 11:22 AM, Jarbidge wrote: >>> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 02:57:54 -0700, Charles Bell wrote: >>> >>>> There is nothing in logic or in the >>>> Constitution itself that forces the judiciary to throw out law [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/11/2011 4:03 PM, Strabo wrote:<br />
> On 4/11/2011 12:36 PM, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:<br />
>> On 4/11/2011 11:22 AM, Jarbidge wrote:<br />
>>> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 02:57:54 -0700, Charles Bell wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>> There is nothing in logic or in the<br />
>>>> Constitution itself that forces the judiciary to throw out law for<br />
>>>> Constitutional reasons.<br />
>>><br />
>>> So logic tells you we still have the children of slaves to safeguard?<br />
>>><br />
>>> Get a grip.<br />
>><br />
>> It&#8217;s been 150 years since slavery, we are speaking of grandchildren and<br />
>> great-grand children of slaves&#8230;.  In any case the government can&#8217;t<br />
>> make anyone equal, all the government can do is treat everyone equal as<br />
>> the constitution says.  There is no Right to remain equal after born,<br />
>> just a Right to be treated equal by the government.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
><br />
> Since government cannot make everyone equal, the Liberal/Progressives<br />
> stack the deck against the cause of this inequity &#8211; the Evil White<br />
> Male. The EWM must be made to pay for his transgressions.<br />
><br />
> That&#8217;s the way the Liberal/Progressives see it. It reflects the<br />
> manner in which they mentally construct their world.  Individual<br />
> freedom which scares or makes the Liberal/Progressive feel bad and<br />
> must not be tolerated.<br />
><br />
> As for slavery, the Black Mafia plays government like a violin<br />
> and white Americans are forced to dance their tune.<br />
><br />
><br />
>><br />
>> What&#8217;s sad is The Liberals have destroyed the government treating people<br />
>> equal and decided that they could pass unconstitutional laws to force<br />
>> people to treat one another equal while government doesn&#8217;t.<br />
>><br />
><br />
> Who is pro-union?  Who is an egalitarian. Who is for &#8216;social justice?&#8217;<br />
> Who believes that guns kill people?<br />
><br />
> Collectivists, that&#8217;s who. People who believe that man is inherently<br />
> bad and must be forced into governable groups. The individual doesn&#8217;t<br />
> exist and freedom is relative.  Do-gooders seeking retribution and<br />
> &#8216;fairness&#8217; use government to impose their will. This places all power<br />
> with the state.<br />
><br />
> Nazi Germany was a hotbed of collectivists. The USSR was built on<br />
> collectivist principles. History repeats. Need I say more.<br />
><br />
> So it is with today&#8217;s Liberal/Progressives</p>
<p>The difference between Hitler and Obama is that Hitler loved his Nation<br />
and was Nationalistic. Obama doesn&#8217;t love his Nation and seeks a world<br />
power to dominate his own country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/11/anchor-babies-are-100-legal-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Join the Christian Coalition&#8217;s Campaign to Stop Taxpayer Funding for Abortion</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/07/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-13/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/07/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-13/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 16:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=19038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/7/2011 8:01 AM, Andy Helliwell wrote: > &#8220;Beam Me Up Scotty&#8221; schreef > in bericht news:4D9D31FE.8040602 @&#038;*$?%Blackhole.NebulaX.com&#8230; >> On 4/6/2011 8:14 PM, Andy Helliwell wrote: >>> &#8220; P&#038;*$?%s&#8221; schreef in bericht >>> news:iniup3$573$3 @&#038;*$?%dont-email.me&#8230; >>>> On 4/6/2011 3:53 PM, Andy Helliwell wrote: >>>>> &#8220; P&#038;*$?%s&#8221; schreef in bericht >>>>> news:inioo5$hc9$1 @&#038;*$?%dont-email.me&#8230; >>>>>> On 4/6/2011 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/7/2011 8:01 AM, Andy Helliwell wrote:<br />
> &#8220;Beam Me Up Scotty&#8221;
<then -Destroy-Everything<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Blackhole.NebulaX.com> schreef<br />
> in bericht news:4D9D31FE.8040602<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Blackhole.NebulaX.com&#8230;<br />
>> On 4/6/2011 8:14 PM, Andy Helliwell wrote:<br />
>>> &#8220;<acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym>&#8221; <none @none.com> schreef in bericht<br />
>>> news:iniup3$573$3<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>dont-email.me&#8230;<br />
>>>> On 4/6/2011 3:53 PM, Andy Helliwell wrote:<br />
>>>>> &#8220;<acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym>&#8221;</none><none @none.com>  schreef in bericht<br />
>>>>> news:inioo5$hc9$1<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>dont-email.me&#8230;<br />
>>>>>> On 4/6/2011 2:07 PM, Andy Helliwell wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> &#8220;<acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym>&#8221;</none><none @none.com>   schreef in bericht<br />
>>>>>>> news:inij68$thb$2<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>dont-email.me&#8230;<br />
>>>>>>>> On 4/6/2011 1:11 PM, Andy Helliwell wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>> &#8220;<acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym>&#8221;</none><none @none.com>    schreef in bericht<br />
>>>>>>>>> news:iniggj$k5a$1<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>dont-email.me&#8230;<br />
>>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> public healthcare is compelled healthcare.<br />
>>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> There is nothing wrong in a government compelling it&#8217;s<br />
>>>>>>>>> people to be healthy, if the people are healthy the<br />
>>>>>>>>>     country is healthy too.Healthy, happy people work<br />
>>>>>>>>> and think better, the whole country benefits from<br />
>>>>>>>>> that. Having no social net to help people to stay out<br />
>>>>>>>>> of poverty causes crime, crime costs an awful<br />
>>>>>>>>> lot.<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> You are merely advocating totalitarianism: let me decide what is<br />
>>>>>>>> best<br />
>>>>>>>> for<br />
>>>>>>>> you, and then force you to do it.<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> I advocate freedom: let me decide what is best for me.<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> Do you admit that you are a totalitarian?<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> The survival of the state depends on it&#8217;s  people<br />
>>>>>>> being healthy and happy.That makes them creative,<br />
>>>>>>> in turn the state only wins.Kids dying of tooth ache<br />
>>>>>>> in the US cos their parents are too poor to pay a<br />
>>>>>>> dentist only shows how wrong your system is.<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> Americans don&#8217;t want to pay a universal health<br />
>>>>>>>    care,everything is self, self, self in the USA<br />
>>>>>>> How can you ever survive with that stupid<br />
>>>>>>> attitude ?<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>                           Andy<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> Do you admit that you are a totalitarian?<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> Am I a totalitarian ? I am Dutch we don&#8217;t drink tea.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> So you can&#8217;t answer the question.  OK.<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>> I am a &#8220;totalitarian&#8221; when it comes to health care,<br />
>>> everyone should get it, cos good health of the<br />
>>> population is critical to the state.<br />
>>><br />
>>>                               Andy<br />
>><br />
>> That&#8217;s sure what Hitler believed.<br />
>><br />
><br />
> I don&#8217;t really think that Hitler was very concerned<br />
>  about health care man.</p>
<p>Hitler cared so much that he was creating the ultimate Aryan race, and<br />
at the same time, eliminating the &#8220;inferior&#8221;  races.</p>
<p></none></then>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/07/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Join the Christian Coalition&#8217;s Campaign to Stop Taxpayer Funding for Abortion</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/06/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-12/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/06/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 03:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=19026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/6/2011 5:07 PM, Andy Helliwell wrote: > &#8220; P&#038;*$?%s&#8221; schreef in bericht > news:inij68$thb$2 @&#038;*$?%dont-email.me&#8230; >> On 4/6/2011 1:11 PM, Andy Helliwell wrote: >>> &#8220; P&#038;*$?%s&#8221; schreef in bericht >>> news:iniggj$k5a$1 @&#038;*$?%dont-email.me&#8230; >>> >>> public healthcare is compelled healthcare. >>> >>> >>> >>> There is nothing wrong in a government compelling it&#8217;s >>> people [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/6/2011 5:07 PM, Andy Helliwell wrote:<br />
> &#8220;<acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym>&#8221; <none @none.com> schreef in bericht<br />
> news:inij68$thb$2<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>dont-email.me&#8230;<br />
>> On 4/6/2011 1:11 PM, Andy Helliwell wrote:<br />
>>> &#8220;<acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym>&#8221;</none><none @none.com>  schreef in bericht<br />
>>> news:iniggj$k5a$1<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>dont-email.me&#8230;<br />
>>><br />
>>> public healthcare is compelled healthcare.<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>> There is nothing wrong in a government compelling it&#8217;s<br />
>>> people to be healthy, if the people are healthy the<br />
>>>   country is healthy too.Healthy, happy people work<br />
>>> and think better, the whole country benefits from<br />
>>> that. Having no social net to help people to stay out<br />
>>> of poverty causes crime, crime costs an awful<br />
>>> lot.<br />
>><br />
>> You are merely advocating totalitarianism: let me decide what is best for<br />
>> you, and then force you to do it.<br />
>><br />
>> I advocate freedom: let me decide what is best for me.<br />
>><br />
>> Do you admit that you are a totalitarian?<br />
><br />
><br />
> The survival of the state depends on it&#8217;s  people<br />
> being healthy and happy.That makes them creative,<br />
> in turn the state only wins.Kids dying of tooth ache<br />
> in the US cos their parents are too poor to pay a<br />
> dentist only shows how wrong your system is.</p>
<p>The State keeps you alive so it can use you?</p>
<p>How democratic of the State, when you cost to much, will the States kill<br />
you for the good of the State?</p>
<p></none></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/06/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Join the Christian Coalition&#8217;s Campaign to Stop Taxpayer Funding for Abortion</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/06/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-11/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/06/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 03:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=19024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/6/2011 8:14 PM, Andy Helliwell wrote: > &#8220; P&#038;*$?%s&#8221; schreef in bericht > news:iniup3$573$3 @&#038;*$?%dont-email.me&#8230; >> On 4/6/2011 3:53 PM, Andy Helliwell wrote: >>> &#8220; P&#038;*$?%s&#8221; schreef in bericht >>> news:inioo5$hc9$1 @&#038;*$?%dont-email.me&#8230; >>>> On 4/6/2011 2:07 PM, Andy Helliwell wrote: >>>>> &#8220; P&#038;*$?%s&#8221; schreef in bericht >>>>> news:inij68$thb$2 @&#038;*$?%dont-email.me&#8230; >>>>>> On 4/6/2011 1:11 PM, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/6/2011 8:14 PM, Andy Helliwell wrote:<br />
> &#8220;<acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym>&#8221; <none @none.com> schreef in bericht<br />
> news:iniup3$573$3<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>dont-email.me&#8230;<br />
>> On 4/6/2011 3:53 PM, Andy Helliwell wrote:<br />
>>> &#8220;<acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym>&#8221;</none><none @none.com>  schreef in bericht<br />
>>> news:inioo5$hc9$1<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>dont-email.me&#8230;<br />
>>>> On 4/6/2011 2:07 PM, Andy Helliwell wrote:<br />
>>>>> &#8220;<acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym>&#8221;</none><none @none.com>   schreef in bericht<br />
>>>>> news:inij68$thb$2<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>dont-email.me&#8230;<br />
>>>>>> On 4/6/2011 1:11 PM, Andy Helliwell wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> &#8220;<acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym>&#8221;</none><none @none.com>    schreef in bericht<br />
>>>>>>> news:iniggj$k5a$1<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>dont-email.me&#8230;<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> public healthcare is compelled healthcare.<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> There is nothing wrong in a government compelling it&#8217;s<br />
>>>>>>> people to be healthy, if the people are healthy the<br />
>>>>>>>     country is healthy too.Healthy, happy people work<br />
>>>>>>> and think better, the whole country benefits from<br />
>>>>>>> that. Having no social net to help people to stay out<br />
>>>>>>> of poverty causes crime, crime costs an awful<br />
>>>>>>> lot.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> You are merely advocating totalitarianism: let me decide what is best<br />
>>>>>> for<br />
>>>>>> you, and then force you to do it.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> I advocate freedom: let me decide what is best for me.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> Do you admit that you are a totalitarian?<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> The survival of the state depends on it&#8217;s  people<br />
>>>>> being healthy and happy.That makes them creative,<br />
>>>>> in turn the state only wins.Kids dying of tooth ache<br />
>>>>> in the US cos their parents are too poor to pay a<br />
>>>>> dentist only shows how wrong your system is.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> Americans don&#8217;t want to pay a universal health<br />
>>>>>    care,everything is self, self, self in the USA<br />
>>>>> How can you ever survive with that stupid<br />
>>>>> attitude ?<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>>                           Andy<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Do you admit that you are a totalitarian?<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>> Am I a totalitarian ? I am Dutch we don&#8217;t drink tea.<br />
>><br />
>> So you can&#8217;t answer the question.  OK.<br />
><br />
><br />
> I am a &#8220;totalitarian&#8221; when it comes to health care,<br />
> everyone should get it, cos good health of the<br />
> population is critical to the state.<br />
><br />
>                               Andy</p>
<p>That&#8217;s sure what Hitler believed.</p>
<p></none></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/06/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The GOP Path to Prosperity (Video)</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/05/the-gop-path-to-prosperity-video/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/05/the-gop-path-to-prosperity-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 18:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=18944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/5/2011 11:23 AM, Seth wrote: > The GOP Path to Prosperity (Video) > > This budget cuts $6.2 trillion in spending from the president&#8217;s budget > over the next 10 years and puts the nation on track to pay off our > national debt. > > And give America back to Americans Reducing regulations [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/5/2011 11:23 AM, Seth wrote:<br />
> The GOP Path to Prosperity (Video)<br />
><br />
> This budget cuts $6.2 trillion in spending from the president&#8217;s budget<br />
> over the next 10 years and puts the nation on track to pay off our<br />
> national debt.<br />
><br />
> <embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Xwv5EbxXSmE&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>And give America back to Americans</p>
<p>Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression.</p>
<p>End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
prostitutes when there are so many legal tax paying prostitutes out there?</p>
<p><a href="http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs--crime-usage-falls" >http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs&#8211;crime-usage-falls</a></p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED<br />
money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad. All electronic money leaving the USA would be debited the<br />
Sales tax when the money is sent/spent.</p>
<p>The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drug smuggling less*<br />
*profitable* as would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL<br />
“NEW ITEM” SALES TAX *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE<br />
DRUG DEALERS and illegals by making their tax free money leaving the<br />
country even more valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the RED money<br />
for GREEN money then you would charge the sales tax at that point.</p>
<p>Have the States Ratify an amendment withdrawing the 16th amendment&#8230;<br />
Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (Federal sales<br />
tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED TAX* with the same amendment that<br />
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a Federal *NEW ITEM* sales tax.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
*GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add to<br />
the amendment that if congress raises sales tax by 1% they are forced to<br />
cut every single expenditure of the government by 3%.</p>
<p>Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
of our military bases along the southern Border to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the Border patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
Federal trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases.</p>
<p>This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
outside the USA. That will make it harder for smugglers to get money out<br />
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch smugglers. We<br />
are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
borrow like income tax does.</p>
<p>This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less welfare and charge them<br />
tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>Pass an amendment to the constitution that makes all<br />
*laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.</p>
<p>There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. And a<br />
constitutional amendment to limit the Interstate Commerce Clause. The<br />
politicians use that clause to justify all sorts of socialist <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>. The<br />
founding fathers never meant for it to be so broadly applied. Limit it<br />
with an amendment, so government can&#8217;t justify every crazy Socialist<br />
idea by saying its legal under the interstate commerce clause.</p>
<p>Pass another amendment creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP CONGRESS FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING MONEY. The way to limit<br />
some of the Presidents spending is to put an amendment in the<br />
constitution, and limit the Executive branch to 1% of the Nations income<br />
for foreign aid. That should reduce the Presidents buying of other<br />
Nations &#8220;friendship&#8221;.</p>
<p>To quit filling the jails with people over *social taboos* , we need to<br />
take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;social engineer&#8221; the businesses or the<br />
private people by removing the governments use of IRS tax code to<br />
manipulate people. Getting rid of the Income tax and IRS as suggested<br />
above will do that.</p>
<p>Government needs to spend 10% less every year until they meet the<br />
income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
force an across the board spending cap at 20% of GDP and then across the<br />
board cuts on the government spending, to include a law in our TAX<br />
amendment to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
federal sales tax increase would result in automatic spending cuts using<br />
a baseline of 10% taxes.</p>
<p>And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
them fight their own fights. We also need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
committing(fewer laws), we need fewer police and prisons to support&#8230;.<br />
and the above drug and tax plan, will reduce police and prison needs by<br />
at least that 10% that this plan suggested cutting each year.</p>
<p>NO welfare to corporations, and cut welfare to private people by 10%<br />
each year until it is 10% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
in DEEP for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/05/the-gop-path-to-prosperity-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Join the Christian Coalition&#8217;s Campaign to Stop Taxpayer Funding for Abortion</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/04/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-8/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/04/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 18:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BTW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=18890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/4/2011 11:56 AM, P&#038;*$?%s wrote: > On 4/3/2011 11:26 AM, liberal wrote: >> On Mar 30, 10:20 pm, P&#038;*$?%s wrote: >>> On 3/30/2011 6:56 PM, Gary Forbis wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Mar 30, 5:45 pm, P&#038;*$?%s wrote: >>>>> On 3/30/2011 4:41 PM, JLS wrote: >>> >>>>>> You keep asking this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/4/2011 11:56 AM, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym> wrote:<br />
> On 4/3/2011 11:26 AM, liberal wrote:<br />
>> On Mar 30, 10:20 pm, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym><n ...@none.com>  wrote:<br />
>>> On 3/30/2011 6:56 PM, Gary Forbis wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>>> On Mar 30, 5:45 pm, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym></n><n ...@none.com>    wrote:<br />
>>>>> On 3/30/2011 4:41 PM, JLS wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>     You keep asking this question and once again the answer is &#8220;NO!&#8221;<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> If you don&#8217;t approve of abortion, don&#8217;t have one.   In the meantime<br />
>>>>>> _Roes vs. Wade,_ which guarantees the reproductive privacy of our<br />
>>>>>> nation&#8217;s women, is the law of the land.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> As well as government-sanctioned murder.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> BTW: where exactly does it say that taxpayers must fund abortion?<br />
>>><br />
>>>> Or give tax credit for &#8220;charitable&#8221; contributions to churches?<br />
>>>> Why do my taxes have to be higher so people can give to their<br />
>>>> social club.  I gain nothing from church funding and the preaching<br />
>>>> done in many churches actually hurts our society.  Let&#8217;s stop<br />
>>>> funding military chaplins too.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Wrong direction.  Why are corporations taxed at all?<br />
>><br />
>> Ummm, that question would be like asking why corporations have to pay<br />
>> for *ALL* the goods and services they use&#8230;you know, like labor,<br />
>> energy, materials&#8230;.</p>
<p>Which is why there needs to be (consumption)Sales Tax rather than an<br />
income tax, that way you are taxing the money, not the people or the<br />
corporations, it takes the &#8220;SOCIAL&#8221; aspect out of taxation.</p>
<p>If you spend money the money is taxed no matter how you get it.</p>
<p>I could go farther and say that the sales tax could be progressive so<br />
that items have 0% tax up to $100 and 1% up to $200&#8230;..  10% on<br />
$1,000-$1,100</p>
<p>But I don&#8217;t think you need that progressive <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>.</p>
<p></n></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/04/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Join the Christian Coalition&#8217;s Campaign to Stop Taxpayer Funding for Abortion</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/04/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-7/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/04/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 18:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BTW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=18888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/4/2011 11:56 AM, P&#038;*$?%s wrote: > On 4/3/2011 11:26 AM, liberal wrote: >> On Mar 30, 10:20 pm, P&#038;*$?%s wrote: >>> On 3/30/2011 6:56 PM, Gary Forbis wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Mar 30, 5:45 pm, P&#038;*$?%s wrote: >>>>> On 3/30/2011 4:41 PM, JLS wrote: >>> >>>>>> You keep asking this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/4/2011 11:56 AM, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym> wrote:<br />
> On 4/3/2011 11:26 AM, liberal wrote:<br />
>> On Mar 30, 10:20 pm, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym><n ...@none.com>  wrote:<br />
>>> On 3/30/2011 6:56 PM, Gary Forbis wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>>> On Mar 30, 5:45 pm, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym></n><n ...@none.com>    wrote:<br />
>>>>> On 3/30/2011 4:41 PM, JLS wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>     You keep asking this question and once again the answer is &#8220;NO!&#8221;<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> If you don&#8217;t approve of abortion, don&#8217;t have one.   In the meantime<br />
>>>>>> _Roes vs. Wade,_ which guarantees the reproductive privacy of our<br />
>>>>>> nation&#8217;s women, is the law of the land.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> As well as government-sanctioned murder.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> BTW: where exactly does it say that taxpayers must fund abortion?<br />
>>><br />
>>>> Or give tax credit for &#8220;charitable&#8221; contributions to churches?<br />
>>>> Why do my taxes have to be higher so people can give to their<br />
>>>> social club.  I gain nothing from church funding and the preaching<br />
>>>> done in many churches actually hurts our society.  Let&#8217;s stop<br />
>>>> funding military chaplins too.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Wrong direction.  Why are corporations taxed at all?<br />
>><br />
>> Ummm, that question would be like asking why corporations have to pay<br />
>> for *ALL* the goods and services they use&#8230;you know, like labor,<br />
>> energy, materials&#8230;.</p>
<p>Which is why there needs to be (consumption)Sales Tax rather than an<br />
income tax, that way you are taxing the money, not the people or the<br />
corporations, it takes the &#8220;SOCIAL&#8221; aspect out of taxation.</p>
<p>If you spend money the money is taxed no matter how you get it.</p>
<p></n></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/04/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Join the Christian Coalition&#8217;s Campaign to Stop Taxpayer Funding for Abortion</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/03/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-6/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/03/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 01:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BTW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=18846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/3/2011 6:30 PM, Jeff Strickland wrote: > &#8220; P&#038;*$?%s&#8221; wrote in message > news:ina1f6$5gq$2 @&#038;*$?%dont-email.me&#8230; >> On 4/1/2011 4:40 PM, Jeff Strickland wrote: >>> &#8220; P&#038;*$?%s&#8221; wrote in message >>> news:in5ivi$9c8$3 @&#038;*$?%dont-email.me&#8230; >>>> On 4/1/2011 12:59 PM, Jeff Strickland wrote: >>>>> &#8220; P&#038;*$?%s&#8221; wrote in message >>>>> news:in3k1b$h7d$1 @&#038;*$?%dont-email.me&#8230; >>>>>> On 3/31/2011 6:29 PM, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/3/2011 6:30 PM, Jeff Strickland wrote:<br />
> &#8220;<acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym>&#8221; <none @none.com> wrote in message<br />
> news:ina1f6$5gq$2<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>dont-email.me&#8230;<br />
>> On 4/1/2011 4:40 PM, Jeff Strickland wrote:<br />
>>> &#8220;<acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym>&#8221;</none><none @none.com>  wrote in message<br />
>>> news:in5ivi$9c8$3<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>dont-email.me&#8230;<br />
>>>> On 4/1/2011 12:59 PM, Jeff Strickland wrote:<br />
>>>>> &#8220;<acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym>&#8221;</none><none @none.com>   wrote in message<br />
>>>>> news:in3k1b$h7d$1<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>dont-email.me&#8230;<br />
>>>>>> On 3/31/2011 6:29 PM, Gary Forbis wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> On Mar 30, 7:20 pm, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym><n ...@none.com>    wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>> On 3/30/2011 6:56 PM, Gary Forbis wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> On Mar 30, 5:45 pm, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym></n><n ...@none.com>      wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>>> On 3/30/2011 4:41 PM, JLS wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>       You keep asking this question and once again the answer is<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> &#8220;NO!&#8221;<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>> If you don&#8217;t approve of abortion, don&#8217;t have one.   In the<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> meantime<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> _Roes vs. Wade,_ which guarantees the reproductive privacy of our<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> nation&#8217;s women, is the law of the land.<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>> As well as government-sanctioned murder.<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>> BTW: where exactly does it say that taxpayers must fund abortion?<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> Or give tax credit for &#8220;charitable&#8221; contributions to churches?<br />
>>>>>>>>> Why do my taxes have to be higher so people can give to their<br />
>>>>>>>>> social club.  I gain nothing from church funding and the preaching<br />
>>>>>>>>> done in many churches actually hurts our society.  Let&#8217;s stop<br />
>>>>>>>>> funding military chaplins too.<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> Wrong direction.  Why are corporations taxed at all?<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> OK, I wasn&#8217;t going to respond, but&#8230;.<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> The USSC has ruled that corporations are people.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> Under what magical authority?<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> Corporations aren&#8217;t people, fictitious or otherwise.  It is just an<br />
>>>>>> unauthorized attempt at control.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> A corporation is what they term a &#8220;legal person.&#8221; Not an individual<br />
>>>>> person,<br />
>>>>> like you and I, but a legal person. This is why you can sue a<br />
>>>>> corporation.<br />
>>>>> You sue a person to redress a wrong. If a corporation was not a legal<br />
>>>>> person, who would you sue for remedy of a perceived wrong?<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> You do not sue the board of directors or the CEO, you sue the<br />
>>>>> company &#8211;<br />
>>>>> the<br />
>>>>> corporation. Maybe you should sue the Board or the CEO, but these are<br />
>>>>> generally shielded and you cannot sue them. The whole reason to make a<br />
>>>>> corporation is to shield yourself personally from the liabilities of<br />
>>>>> the<br />
>>>>> company &#8212; Bob Smith is not liable for the misdeeds of Acme Products.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> So, a corporation is considered by all to be a legal person.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> There is always a person/people behind the scenes, and for a lawsuit,<br />
>>>> they<br />
>>>> are the ones that are targeted.  The corporation can&#8217;t go to prison, but<br />
>>>> people do.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> There is no justified need for the notion of a fictitious (legal)<br />
>>>> person,<br />
>>>> it is merely an (inconvenient) abstraction that serves the corporation<br />
>>>> and<br />
>>>> government, but little else.<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>> You are in error. And, it is settled caselaw. There is no chance you will<br />
>>> win this argument. None. Not any. A corporation is what it is, and it has<br />
>>> been defined as a legal person.<br />
>><br />
>> Oh, I understand that it is the law.  I&#8217;m challenging the justification of<br />
>> the law &#8212; I see none.<br />
><br />
><br />
> I have explained the justification to you on more than one occasion.<br />
><br />
> You sue a person for redress of wrongs. A corporation is a legal person,<br />
> whom you sue for the redress of a wrong. The corporation will carry<br />
> liability insurance, just as any other person would do, and the insurance<br />
> company covers the corporate liability to the policy limits. You do not sue<br />
> Bob Smith or the Board of Directors of Acme Widgets because a widget<br />
> exploded when you were using it. You sue Acme Widgets because the widget was<br />
> faulty. Bob keeps his home and his car, the Board all keep their homes and<br />
> cars. Acme pays you to redress the wrongs you have suffered.<br />
><br />
> You assert, wrongly, that there is no justification for the mechanism to<br />
> work like this, but the mechanism works like this nonetheless, and it does<br />
> so because a corporation is a legal person.</p>
<p>When you die, your wealth is taxed away&#8230;.  but a corporation never<br />
dies and never has it&#8217;s wealth taxed away?</p>
<p>can I incorporate myself and then sell myself to another corporation?</p>
<p>That way I am NOT at the top of a series of shell corporations but at<br />
the bottom and the top so it&#8217;s a circular situation where I will never<br />
die and my assets never face a death tax?</p>
<p></n></none></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/03/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It is unconstitutional to create *ex post facto law*  Which is what judges interpreting laws is&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/02/it-is-unconstitutional-to-create-ex-post-facto-law-which-is-what-judges-interpreting-laws-is/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/02/it-is-unconstitutional-to-create-ex-post-facto-law-which-is-what-judges-interpreting-laws-is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 08:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crazy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Thu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unconstitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoorghis Jurgis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=18743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/1/2011 3:42 PM, Art Sowers wrote: > > > On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: > >> On 4/1/2011 12:16 PM, Yoorghis @&#038;*$?%Jurgis.net wrote: >>> On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 10:50:49 -0400, Animal 07 >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 4/1/2011 9:14 AM, Yoorghis @&#038;*$?%Jurgis.net wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/1/2011 3:42 PM, Art Sowers wrote:<br />
><br />
><br />
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:<br />
><br />
>> On 4/1/2011 12:16 PM, <a href="mailto:Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net">Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
>>> On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 10:50:49 -0400, Animal 07 <wherewasi @friday.com><br />
>>> wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>> On 4/1/2011 9:14 AM, <a href="mailto:Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net">Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 18:18:55 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty<br />
>>>>>
<then -Destroy-Everything<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Blackhole.NebulaX.com>  wrote:<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>>> On 3/31/2011 5:34 PM, <a href="mailto:Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net">Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:30:24 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty<br />
>>>>>>> </then>
<then -Destroy-Everything<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Blackhole.NebulaX.com>  wrote:<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> Where is your power to interpret the constitution, in the<br />
>>>>>>>> constitution?<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
><br />
>>>>> the constitution to be law.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> This idea of case law is its self against the tenets of equal justice<br />
>>>>>> since they are using predetermined conclusions from unrelated cases.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> Thats babbling<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> &#8220;beamed&#8221; misses the fact that &#8220;reading&#8221; requires interpretation<br />
>><br />
>> Reading requires understanding, we call it comprehension NOT<br />
>> interpreting.<br />
><br />
> Most reasonable and wise people already know that what a conservative<br />
> means when he uses the word _freedom_ is diferent than when a liberal<br />
> uses it.<br />
><br />
>   The point is to comprehend what the words mean not what<br />
>> the author was thinking or meant to say but didn&#8217;t.<br />
><br />
> Reading what is on alt.politics.economics shows me that there is endless<br />
> arguing about this.<br />
><br />
>   That would be mind<br />
>> reading and while you may be good at it,<br />
><br />
> Since you used the word _reading_, that would mean that there was<br />
> something readable in another mind, meaning absolute knowledge and<br />
> symbology (such as numbers and math).<br />
><br />
>  in our legal system we don&#8217;t<br />
>> allow it in courts.<br />
><br />
> Mind reading doesn&#8217;t exist anywhere, and juries always interpret the<br />
> evidence.</p>
<p>I might accept it as a word describing the Juries job, they weigh the<br />
testimony and they evaluate evidence but I&#8217;m not ready to say they<br />
interpret evidence, consultants give testimony evaluating technical<br />
evidence.  I&#8217;m not all that sure that it&#8217;s constitutional to have<br />
someone &#8220;tell you what evidence means&#8221; since that is second hand<br />
information and not direct evidence. If you can&#8217;t see what evidence<br />
means then it really isn&#8217;t evidence is it, it is someone telling you<br />
that it is evidence.</p>
<p>>> It&#8217;s funny that you tell me &#8220;WE&#8221; in the constitution means we all have<br />
>> to do things together not individually and yet here you expound the idea<br />
>> that judges have the right to interpret meaning and not simply<br />
>> comprehend the words meaning on the actual meaning that &#8220;WE&#8221; have all<br />
>> agreed the words represent.<br />
><br />
> The judge has the authority, not you.</p>
<p>As I have said the Judge doesn&#8217;t have constitutional authority to<br />
rewrite any law. The judge can read it and use it but NOT change it.</p>
<p>>  You want to redefine the words as you want<br />
>> the judges to interpret the laws.<br />
>><br />
>> If you interpret everything on a minute by minute basis, nothing ever<br />
>> written is worth the paper is was written on,<br />
><br />
> Oh, yes it is. Microscopic amounts of ink add calorimetricly greater<br />
> amounts of stored enegy along with that, preexisting, of the paper under<br />
> the ink.</p>
<p>But then you have to recycle it which makes it cost more with ink which<br />
has to be bleached.</p>
<p>><br />
>  maybe I should interpret<br />
>> the Judges interpretation and so on.<br />
><br />
> You can&#8217;t. You can only say whether you like or not like what the judge<br />
> did. Or, you can have</p>
<p>Which is what a judge can do.</p>
<p>>   Every judge can interpret the<br />
>> newest interpretation and by the time you get to the end of this gossip<br />
>> circle the entire idea has become convoluted&#8230;<br />
><br />
> Just like Usenet.</p>
<p>Yes.  Including the 3rd grade educations.</p>
<p>>   Surely in 3rd grade<br />
>> you stood in a circle in class and someone would read a sentence from a<br />
>> paper and whisper in the ear of the person to their left and as each kid<br />
>> whispers the sentence they heard until it goes around and back to where<br />
>> it started, only to have the last kid say out loud what they were told.<br />
>> It never matched the sentence that was written on the paper.<br />
><br />
> Its called the &#8220;psychology of rumor&#8221; and is taught in all college<br />
> courses in social psychology.</p>
<p>3rd grade was where I learned it and I can&#8217;t recall it being in my<br />
College psych class.  It would be a good internet lesson to tech on teh<br />
internet some how.</p>
<p>>   You want<br />
>> laws created by a gossip circle.<br />
><br />
> Your choice: be a member or not of that circle.<br />
><br />
>   Are we a NATION of laws or a NATION<br />
>> of GOSSIP circles?<br />
><br />
> The later.<br />
><br />
>><br />
>>> The poor <acronym title="asshole"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> a&*$?%e</span></acronym> just publicly claimed that &#8220;NO interpretation of law<br />
>>> was possible&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> If you are a judge interpreting a law, how was I supposed to obey a law<br />
>> that was never &#8220;interpreted&#8221; for me until you the judge has done it?<br />
><br />
> By reading about it in the media.</p>
<p>But the interpretation can&#8217;t be done until that case is done and someone<br />
has finally been dragged to court with all that expense to be found<br />
innocent or guilty for the interpretation that did NOT exist until after<br />
the case was over.</p>
<p>It is unconstitutional to create *ex post facto law* and make the law<br />
after the &#8220;crime&#8221; &#8211; then prosecute so it is the chicken or the egg<br />
argument.  You can&#8217;t Prosecute someone with your NEW interpreted law<br />
until it is a written law because that is the ex post facto. Obviously<br />
any Judge that is &#8220;manipulating or interpreting&#8221; a law is creating ex<br />
post facto law.</p>
<p>["""[Section. 9.<br />
The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now<br />
existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the<br />
Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a<br />
Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten<br />
dollars for each Person.</p>
<p>The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended,<br />
unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may<br />
require it.</p>
<p>*No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed* .]&#8220;&#8221;"]</p>
<p>>> Isn&#8217;t that too late, shouldn&#8217;t I have known what the law meant when it<br />
>> was written&#8230;.    Are you such a fool?<br />
><br />
> Courts and judges are &#8220;interpreting&#8221; laws since courts and judges,<br />
> thousands of years ago, started doing that.<br />
></p>
<p>Is that why we had Slavery for thousands of years?</p>
<p>>> Once interpreted, why isn&#8217;t it then re-voted on and enacted as a law so<br />
>> that I can find the new interpreted version in the law books of the<br />
>> land? Is it because that would be a constitutional way to do it?<br />
><br />
> Its easier and cheaper to listen to the gossip in the gossip circle.</p>
<p>It costs $24,000 per year per student&#8230;..  average 30 per class.</p>
<p>and yes cheap is good unless it is an excuse to steal my freedom.   Than<br />
it equates to me being a slave to the government who is going to treat<br />
me like they own me.</p>
<p>>> That is why judges can *only* find a law constitutional or NOT.<br />
><br />
> No, they can interpret it, and issue a court order to make it work.</p>
<p>They do, but it is unconstitutional.</p>
<p>><br />
>> What they say beyond that is irrelevant unless the next step is taken to<br />
>> make the new version into a law.<br />
><br />
> &#8230;with a court order.</p>
<p>If they want to order the congress to do their job, I&#8217;d pay to watch it<br />
on cable TV.</p>
<p>><br />
>> So apparently Judges can&#8217;t interpret a law&#8230;. if it isn&#8217;t written then<br />
>> I can&#8217;t follow it as law and if it isn&#8217;t passed by congress it isn&#8217;t<br />
>> written law.<br />
><br />
> Even that would be interpreted.</p>
<p>Has ObamaCare Health care law been &#8220;interpreted&#8221; yet?</p>
<p>Part of the problem there is they haven&#8217;t written it all yet&#8230;  So do<br />
you suppose they will write the law before the Judges interpret the law<br />
that hasn&#8217;t been witten?</p>
<p>>> All the Judge has done is file a meaningless &#8220;opinion&#8221;, that is just for<br />
>> other judges and lawyers to quote to one another, for the sake of time<br />
>> saving.<br />
><br />
> Um&#8230;.how come you forgot to get an anti-socialist commment in here,<br />
> anywhere, in this post?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure it was just that I was distracted by the crazy idea that Judges<br />
and government can ignore the constitution, that seems to be more than<br />
just a Socialist disease.</p>
</then></wherewasi></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/02/it-is-unconstitutional-to-create-ex-post-facto-law-which-is-what-judges-interpreting-laws-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Join the Christian Coalition&#8217;s Campaign to Stop Taxpayer Funding for Abortion</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/02/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-5/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/02/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 08:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BTW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotty Everyth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=18741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/1/2011 10:54 PM, Gary Forbis wrote: > On Apr 1, 8:42 am, Beam Me Up Scotty Everyth&#8230;@Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote: >> On 4/1/2011 10:00 AM, Gary Forbis wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Apr 1, 6:50 am, P&#038;*$?%s wrote: >>>> On 3/31/2011 11:22 PM, Gary Forbis wrote: >> >>>>> On Mar 31, 9:24 pm, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/1/2011 10:54 PM, Gary Forbis wrote:<br />
> On Apr 1, 8:42 am, Beam Me Up Scotty
<then -Destroy-<br />
> <a href="mailto:Everyth...@Blackhole.NebulaX.com">Everyth&#8230;@Blackhole.NebulaX.com</a>> wrote:<br />
>> On 4/1/2011 10:00 AM, Gary Forbis wrote:<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>> On Apr 1, 6:50 am, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym> <n ...@none.com> wrote:<br />
>>>> On 3/31/2011 11:22 PM, Gary Forbis wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>> On Mar 31, 9:24 pm, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym></n><n ...@none.com>  wrote:<br />
>>>>>> On 3/31/2011 6:29 PM, Gary Forbis wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>> On Mar 30, 7:20 pm, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym></n><n ...@none.com>    wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>> On 3/30/2011 6:56 PM, Gary Forbis wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>> On Mar 30, 5:45 pm, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym></n><n ...@none.com>      wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>>> On 3/30/2011 4:41 PM, JLS wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>      You keep asking this question and once again the answer is &#8220;NO!&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>> If you don&#8217;t approve of abortion, don&#8217;t have one.   In the meantime<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> _Roes vs. Wade,_ which guarantees the reproductive privacy of our<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> nation&#8217;s women, is the law of the land.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>> As well as government-sanctioned murder.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>> BTW: where exactly does it say that taxpayers must fund abortion?<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>> Or give tax credit for &#8220;charitable&#8221; contributions to churches?<br />
>>>>>>>>> Why do my taxes have to be higher so people can give to their<br />
>>>>>>>>> social club.  I gain nothing from church funding and the preaching<br />
>>>>>>>>> done in many churches actually hurts our society.  Let&#8217;s stop<br />
>>>>>>>>> funding military chaplins too.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>> Wrong direction.  Why are corporations taxed at all?<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>> OK, I wasn&#8217;t going to respond, but&#8230;.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>> The USSC has ruled that corporations are people.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> Under what magical authority?<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> Corporations aren&#8217;t people, fictitious or otherwise.  It is just an<br />
>>>>>> unauthorized attempt at control.<br />
>><br />
>>>>> Yeah, I don&#8217;t think corporations are people either but what&#8217;s a guy<br />
>>>>> to do?  Coprporation have all the rights of people (other than voting)<br />
>>>>> so they should have all the responsibilities.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> Regardless of what the supreme Court rules; /why/ are corporations taxed<br />
>>>>>> at all???!!!<br />
>><br />
>>>>> I&#8217;d rather they didn&#8217;t exist except possibly as S corp.  Pass all<br />
>>>>> tax liability through to their owners.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>> We tax people.  What I don&#8217;t understand is why<br />
>>>>>>> &#8220;businesses&#8221; can write off the costs of production<br />
>>>>>>> but as a laborer I cannot.  Why isn&#8217;t the raw materials<br />
>>>>>>> I consume in the production of my labor a business<br />
>>>>>>> expense?<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> You don&#8217;t know tax law very well.<br />
>><br />
>>>> You can claim those expenses.<br />
>><br />
>>> No, a laborer cannot claim his or her food bill as a business<br />
>>> expense.<br />
>><br />
>> Neither can a stock holder&#8230;..- Hide quoted text -<br />
>><br />
>> &#8211; Show quoted text -<br />
><br />
> Yes, but a business can claim the fuel used in the<br />
> production of its marketable item as a business expense.<br />
> For a labor that fuel is the food eaten.  A business can write</p>
<p>believe me I agree with you, in fact I say that your labor isn&#8217;t taxable<br />
as profit at all&#8230;.  you&#8217;re born with your life as your own and when<br />
you sell your life &#8220;by the hour&#8221;  you are NOT making a profit.</p>
<p>You and your employer set a value of what an hour of your life is worth<br />
and the employer trades you dollars for your hour of life.  Since they<br />
both agreed to the &#8220;value and pay&#8221; being equal, then there is NO profit.</p>
<p>Just like when you buy a car for $1,000 and a month later you sell it<br />
for $1,000. You have made no profit because it was traded and no profit<br />
is there to be called income to pay income tax on.</p>
<p>When you ask $10.00 for an hour of your life and someone pays you, you<br />
have no income from it since it is an even trade, the same as the car<br />
you bought and sold.</p>
<p>The only time your life could be taxed is when a company hires you for<br />
$10.00 an hour and then sells your labor for more than the $10.00 that<br />
they paid. The profit they make on your life is income for them and they<br />
should pay an income tax on it under the present tax debacle.</p>
<p></n></then>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/02/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>out broken record tape loop..</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/01/out-broken-record-tape-loop/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/01/out-broken-record-tape-loop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 22:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crazy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Thu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unconstitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoorghis Jurgis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=18713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/1/2011 3:42 PM, Art Sowers wrote: > > > On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: > >> On 4/1/2011 12:16 PM, Yoorghis @&#038;*$?%Jurgis.net wrote: >>> On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 10:50:49 -0400, Animal 07 >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 4/1/2011 9:14 AM, Yoorghis @&#038;*$?%Jurgis.net wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/1/2011 3:42 PM, Art Sowers wrote:<br />
><br />
><br />
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:<br />
><br />
>> On 4/1/2011 12:16 PM, <a href="mailto:Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net">Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
>>> On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 10:50:49 -0400, Animal 07 <wherewasi @friday.com><br />
>>> wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>> On 4/1/2011 9:14 AM, <a href="mailto:Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net">Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 18:18:55 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty<br />
>>>>>
<then -Destroy-Everything<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Blackhole.NebulaX.com>  wrote:<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>>> On 3/31/2011 5:34 PM, <a href="mailto:Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net">Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:30:24 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty<br />
>>>>>>> </then>
<then -Destroy-Everything<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Blackhole.NebulaX.com>  wrote:<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> Where is your power to interpret the constitution, in the<br />
>>>>>>>> constitution?<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
><br />
>>>>> the constitution to be law.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> This idea of case law is its self against the tenets of equal justice<br />
>>>>>> since they are using predetermined conclusions from unrelated cases.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> Thats babbling<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> &#8220;beamed&#8221; misses the fact that &#8220;reading&#8221; requires interpretation<br />
>><br />
>> Reading requires understanding, we call it comprehension NOT<br />
>> interpreting.<br />
><br />
> Most reasonable and wise people already know that what a conservative<br />
> means when he uses the word _freedom_ is diferent than when a liberal<br />
> uses it.<br />
><br />
>   The point is to comprehend what the words mean not what<br />
>> the author was thinking or meant to say but didn&#8217;t.<br />
><br />
> Reading what is on alt.politics.economics shows me that there is endless<br />
> arguing about this.<br />
><br />
>   That would be mind<br />
>> reading and while you may be good at it,<br />
><br />
> Since you used the word _reading_, that would mean that there was<br />
> something readable in another mind, meaning absolute knowledge and<br />
> symbology (such as numbers and math).<br />
><br />
>  in our legal system we don&#8217;t<br />
>> allow it in courts.<br />
><br />
> Mind reading doesn&#8217;t exist anywhere, and juries always interpret the<br />
> evidence.</p>
<p>I might accept it as a word describing the Juries job, they weigh the<br />
testimony and they evaluate evidence but I&#8217;m not ready to say they<br />
interpret evidence, consultants give testimony evaluating technical<br />
evidence.  I&#8217;m not all that sure that it&#8217;s constitutional to have<br />
someone &#8220;tell you what evidence means&#8221; since that is second hand<br />
information and not direct evidence. If you can&#8217;t see what evidence<br />
means then it really isn&#8217;t evidence is it, it is someone telling you<br />
that it is evidence.</p>
<p>>> It&#8217;s funny that you tell me &#8220;WE&#8221; in the constitution means we all have<br />
>> to do things together not individually and yet here you expound the idea<br />
>> that judges have the right to interpret meaning and not simply<br />
>> comprehend the words meaning on the actual meaning that &#8220;WE&#8221; have all<br />
>> agreed the words represent.<br />
><br />
> The judge has the authority, not you.</p>
<p>As I have said the Judge doesn&#8217;t have constitutional authority to<br />
rewrite any law. The judge can read it and use it but NOT change it.</p>
<p>>  You want to redefine the words as you want<br />
>> the judges to interpret the laws.<br />
>><br />
>> If you interpret everything on a minute by minute basis, nothing ever<br />
>> written is worth the paper is was written on,<br />
><br />
> Oh, yes it is. Microscopic amounts of ink add calorimetricly greater<br />
> amounts of stored enegy along with that, preexisting, of the paper under<br />
> the ink.</p>
<p>But then you have to recycle it which makes it cost more with ink which<br />
has to be bleached.</p>
<p>><br />
>  maybe I should interpret<br />
>> the Judges interpretation and so on.<br />
><br />
> You can&#8217;t. You can only say whether you like or not like what the judge<br />
> did. Or, you can have</p>
<p>Which is what a judge can do.</p>
<p>>   Every judge can interpret the<br />
>> newest interpretation and by the time you get to the end of this gossip<br />
>> circle the entire idea has become convoluted&#8230;<br />
><br />
> Just like Usenet.</p>
<p>Yes.  Including the 3rd grade educations.</p>
<p>>   Surely in 3rd grade<br />
>> you stood in a circle in class and someone would read a sentence from a<br />
>> paper and whisper in the ear of the person to their left and as each kid<br />
>> whispers the sentence they heard until it goes around and back to where<br />
>> it started, only to have the last kid say out loud what they were told.<br />
>> It never matched the sentence that was written on the paper.<br />
><br />
> Its called the &#8220;psychology of rumor&#8221; and is taught in all college<br />
> courses in social psychology.</p>
<p>3rd grade was where I learned it and I can&#8217;t recall it being in my<br />
College psych class.  It would be a good internet lesson to tech on teh<br />
internet some how.</p>
<p>>   You want<br />
>> laws created by a gossip circle.<br />
><br />
> Your choice: be a member or not of that circle.<br />
><br />
>   Are we a NATION of laws or a NATION<br />
>> of GOSSIP circles?<br />
><br />
> The later.<br />
><br />
>><br />
>>> The poor <acronym title="asshole"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> a&*$?%e</span></acronym> just publicly claimed that &#8220;NO interpretation of law<br />
>>> was possible&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> If you are a judge interpreting a law, how was I supposed to obey a law<br />
>> that was never &#8220;interpreted&#8221; for me until you the judge has done it?<br />
><br />
> By reading about it in the media.</p>
<p>But the interpretation can&#8217;t be done until that case is done and someone<br />
has finally been dragged to court with all that expense to be found<br />
innocent or guilty for the interpretation that did NOT exist until after<br />
the case was over.</p>
<p>It is unconstitutional to create *ex post facto law* and make the law<br />
after the &#8220;crime&#8221; &#8211; then prosecute so it is the chicken or the egg<br />
argument.  You can&#8217;t Prosecute someone with your NEW interpreted law<br />
until it is a written law because that is the ex post facto. Obviously<br />
any Judge that is &#8220;manipulating or interpreting&#8221; a law is creating ex<br />
post facto law.</p>
<p>["""[Section. 9.<br />
The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now<br />
existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the<br />
Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a<br />
Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten<br />
dollars for each Person.</p>
<p>The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended,<br />
unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may<br />
require it.</p>
<p>*No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed* .]&#8220;&#8221;"]</p>
<p>>> Isn&#8217;t that too late, shouldn&#8217;t I have known what the law meant when it<br />
>> was written&#8230;.    Are you such a fool?<br />
><br />
> Courts and judges are &#8220;interpreting&#8221; laws since courts and judges,<br />
> thousands of years ago, started doing that.<br />
></p>
<p>Is that why we had Slavery for thousands of years?</p>
<p>>> Once interpreted, why isn&#8217;t it then re-voted on and enacted as a law so<br />
>> that I can find the new interpreted version in the law books of the<br />
>> land? Is it because that would be a constitutional way to do it?<br />
><br />
> Its easier and cheaper to listen to the gossip in the gossip circle.</p>
<p>It costs $24,000 per year per student&#8230;..  average 30 per class.</p>
<p>and yes cheap is good unless it is an excuse to steal my freedom.   Than<br />
it equates to me being a slave to the government who is going to treat<br />
me like they own me.</p>
<p>>> That is why judges can *only* find a law constitutional or NOT.<br />
><br />
> No, they can interpret it, and issue a court order to make it work.</p>
<p>They do, but it is unconstitutional.</p>
<p>><br />
>> What they say beyond that is irrelevant unless the next step is taken to<br />
>> make the new version into a law.<br />
><br />
> &#8230;with a court order.</p>
<p>If they want to order the congress to do their job, I&#8217;d pay to watch it<br />
on cable TV.</p>
<p>><br />
>> So apparently Judges can&#8217;t interpret a law&#8230;. if it isn&#8217;t written then<br />
>> I can&#8217;t follow it as law and if it isn&#8217;t passed by congress it isn&#8217;t<br />
>> written law.<br />
><br />
> Even that would be interpreted.</p>
<p>Has ObamaCare Health care law been &#8220;interpreted&#8221; yet?</p>
<p>Part of the problem there is they haven&#8217;t written it all yet&#8230;  So do<br />
you suppose they will write the law before the Judges interpret the law<br />
that hasn&#8217;t been witten?</p>
<p>>> All the Judge has done is file a meaningless &#8220;opinion&#8221;, that is just for<br />
>> other judges and lawyers to quote to one another, for the sake of time<br />
>> saving.<br />
><br />
> Um&#8230;.how come you forgot to get an anti-socialist commment in here,<br />
> anywhere, in this post?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure it was just that I was distracted by the crazy idea that Judges<br />
and government can ignore the constitution, that seems to be more than<br />
just a Socialist disease.</p>
</then></wherewasi></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/01/out-broken-record-tape-loop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FURTHER, ABSOLUTE, PROOF OBAMA IS AN ILLEGITIMATE PERSON HOLDING THE PUBLIC SERVANT POSITION OF PRESIDENT OF THE USA!</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/01/further-absolute-proof-obama-is-an-illegitimate-person-holding-the-public-servant-position-of-president-of-the-usa/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/01/further-absolute-proof-obama-is-an-illegitimate-person-holding-the-public-servant-position-of-president-of-the-usa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 16:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OBAMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=18681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/1/2011 11:46 AM, wy wrote: > On Apr 1, 9:29 am, John Smith wrote: >> On 3/31/2011 11:13 PM, wy wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Apr 1, 1:42 am, John Smith wrote: >>>> On 3/31/2011 10:20 PM, wy wrote: >> >>>>> &#8230; >>>>> http://archives.starbulletin.com/content/20090606_kokua_line >> >>>> Like I say, only a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/1/2011 11:46 AM, wy wrote:<br />
> On Apr 1, 9:29 am, John Smith <assemblywiz ...@gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>> On 3/31/2011 11:13 PM, wy wrote:<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>> On Apr 1, 1:42 am, John Smith</assemblywiz><assemblywiz ...@gmail.com>  wrote:<br />
>>>> On 3/31/2011 10:20 PM, wy wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>> &#8230;<br />
>>>>> <a href="http://archives.starbulletin.com/content/20090606_kokua_line" >http://archives.starbulletin.com/content/20090606_kokua_line</a><br />
>><br />
>>>> Like I say, only a long form birth certificate will suffice &#8230; either<br />
>>>> obama has one, or he does not &#8230; end of story &#8230;<br />
>><br />
>>> Hawaii doesn&#8217;t issue longforms and never has &#8211; read the links, idiot.<br />
>>> If the one he&#8217;s always had and the one he produced was good enough to<br />
>>> get a social security number, a driver&#8217;s license, a passport, get<br />
>>> married, have kids and become president without anyone stopping him<br />
>>> along the way in the 47 years till he became president, then it&#8217;s very<br />
>>> much likely a legitimate certificate.  &#8230;<br />
>><br />
>> You probably are not aware of this, but people successfully do identity<br />
>> theft all the time.  Indeed, to this very day, even though we have known<br />
>> it is/has-been being done for many years, still successfully do identity<br />
>> theft.<br />
>><br />
>> So, you argument becomes, &#8220;If someone successfully has done identity<br />
>> theft, let them go on doing it!&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>> If you don&#8217;t know what is wrong with your argument, I don&#8217;t believe I<br />
>> have enough time to begin to explain it to you &#8230;<br />
><br />
> Right.  This was a deliberate plot on Obama&#8217;s part to remain<br />
> undetected for 47 years and then become president.  Wow, the nerve of<br />
> the guy.  Maybe I&#8217;d believe it was a plot if he became president and<br />
> then set off nuclear bombs in every major capital in the US to totally<br />
> wipe out the country within a month of his inauguration, because then<br />
> he&#8217;d have the nuclear codes to do it, but two years later he&#8217;s still<br />
> doing pretty much the same thing as any other president, trying to run<br />
> it without getting shot.  Gee, I wonder what the grand master plan was<br />
> all along for pretending to be American, then.  You know, even if he<br />
> weren&#8217;t American and knew it, he could very well have still become a<br />
> citizen just the same.  It happens all the time.  So you have to ask<br />
> yourself, what would be the rationale for Obama to not be a citizen?<br />
> Try not to strain your logic too hard as you attempt to answer that.</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t Obama have to prove &#8220;he is Obama&#8221; in order to prove that someone<br />
stole &#8220;his&#8221; identity, so in a strange way this case of stolen identity<br />
in the courts that Obama will bring against someone&#8230;.</p>
<p>Will mean Obama must prove he was born as Barak Husein Obama&#8230; and that<br />
he was born in the USA as Barak Husein Obama.  If he wasn&#8217;t then who&#8217;s<br />
identity was stolen? We won&#8217;t know if any identity was stolen at all.</p>
<p>This may get interesting.  If Obama wants the charges dropped and<br />
doesn&#8217;t proceed in court it looks bad, and if he takes it to court he<br />
has to prove that he is Barak Husein Obama.</p>
<p></assemblywiz></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/01/further-absolute-proof-obama-is-an-illegitimate-person-holding-the-public-servant-position-of-president-of-the-usa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Join the Christian Coalition&#8217;s Campaign to Stop Taxpayer Funding for Abortion</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/01/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-4/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/01/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BTW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=18679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/1/2011 12:24 AM, P&#038;*$?%s wrote: > On 3/31/2011 6:29 PM, Gary Forbis wrote: >> On Mar 30, 7:20 pm, P&#038;*$?%s wrote: >>> On 3/30/2011 6:56 PM, Gary Forbis wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Mar 30, 5:45 pm, P&#038;*$?%s wrote: >>>>> On 3/30/2011 4:41 PM, JLS wrote: >>> >>>>>> You keep asking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/1/2011 12:24 AM, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym> wrote:<br />
> On 3/31/2011 6:29 PM, Gary Forbis wrote:<br />
>> On Mar 30, 7:20 pm, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym><n ...@none.com>  wrote:<br />
>>> On 3/30/2011 6:56 PM, Gary Forbis wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>>> On Mar 30, 5:45 pm, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym></n><n ...@none.com>    wrote:<br />
>>>>> On 3/30/2011 4:41 PM, JLS wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>     You keep asking this question and once again the answer is &#8220;NO!&#8221;<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> If you don&#8217;t approve of abortion, don&#8217;t have one.   In the meantime<br />
>>>>>> _Roes vs. Wade,_ which guarantees the reproductive privacy of our<br />
>>>>>> nation&#8217;s women, is the law of the land.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> As well as government-sanctioned murder.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> BTW: where exactly does it say that taxpayers must fund abortion?<br />
>>><br />
>>>> Or give tax credit for &#8220;charitable&#8221; contributions to churches?<br />
>>>> Why do my taxes have to be higher so people can give to their<br />
>>>> social club.  I gain nothing from church funding and the preaching<br />
>>>> done in many churches actually hurts our society.  Let&#8217;s stop<br />
>>>> funding military chaplins too.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Wrong direction.  Why are corporations taxed at all?<br />
>><br />
>> OK, I wasn&#8217;t going to respond, but&#8230;.<br />
>><br />
>> The USSC has ruled that corporations are people.<br />
><br />
> Under what magical authority?</p>
<p>The same magical authority they used to determine that a baby in the<br />
uterus is *NOT* a person&#8230;..</p>
<p></n></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/01/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Join the Christian Coalition&#8217;s Campaign to Stop Taxpayer Funding for Abortion</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/01/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-3/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/01/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BTW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=18675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/1/2011 10:00 AM, Gary Forbis wrote: > On Apr 1, 6:50 am, P&#038;*$?%s wrote: >> On 3/31/2011 11:22 PM, Gary Forbis wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Mar 31, 9:24 pm, P&#038;*$?%s wrote: >>>> On 3/31/2011 6:29 PM, Gary Forbis wrote: >> >>>>> On Mar 30, 7:20 pm, P&#038;*$?%s wrote: >>>>>> On [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/1/2011 10:00 AM, Gary Forbis wrote:<br />
> On Apr 1, 6:50 am, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym> <n ...@none.com> wrote:<br />
>> On 3/31/2011 11:22 PM, Gary Forbis wrote:<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>> On Mar 31, 9:24 pm, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym></n><n ...@none.com>  wrote:<br />
>>>> On 3/31/2011 6:29 PM, Gary Forbis wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>> On Mar 30, 7:20 pm, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym></n><n ...@none.com>    wrote:<br />
>>>>>> On 3/30/2011 6:56 PM, Gary Forbis wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>> On Mar 30, 5:45 pm, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym></n><n ...@none.com>      wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>> On 3/30/2011 4:41 PM, JLS wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>      You keep asking this question and once again the answer is &#8220;NO!&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>> If you don&#8217;t approve of abortion, don&#8217;t have one.   In the meantime<br />
>>>>>>>>> _Roes vs. Wade,_ which guarantees the reproductive privacy of our<br />
>>>>>>>>> nation&#8217;s women, is the law of the land.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>> As well as government-sanctioned murder.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>> BTW: where exactly does it say that taxpayers must fund abortion?<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>> Or give tax credit for &#8220;charitable&#8221; contributions to churches?<br />
>>>>>>> Why do my taxes have to be higher so people can give to their<br />
>>>>>>> social club.  I gain nothing from church funding and the preaching<br />
>>>>>>> done in many churches actually hurts our society.  Let&#8217;s stop<br />
>>>>>>> funding military chaplins too.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> Wrong direction.  Why are corporations taxed at all?<br />
>><br />
>>>>> OK, I wasn&#8217;t going to respond, but&#8230;.<br />
>><br />
>>>>> The USSC has ruled that corporations are people.<br />
>><br />
>>>> Under what magical authority?<br />
>><br />
>>>> Corporations aren&#8217;t people, fictitious or otherwise.  It is just an<br />
>>>> unauthorized attempt at control.<br />
>><br />
>>> Yeah, I don&#8217;t think corporations are people either but what&#8217;s a guy<br />
>>> to do?  Coprporation have all the rights of people (other than voting)<br />
>>> so they should have all the responsibilities.<br />
>><br />
>>>> Regardless of what the supreme Court rules; /why/ are corporations taxed<br />
>>>> at all???!!!<br />
>><br />
>>> I&#8217;d rather they didn&#8217;t exist except possibly as S corp.  Pass all<br />
>>> tax liability through to their owners.<br />
>><br />
>>>>> We tax people.  What I don&#8217;t understand is why<br />
>>>>> &#8220;businesses&#8221; can write off the costs of production<br />
>>>>> but as a laborer I cannot.  Why isn&#8217;t the raw materials<br />
>>>>> I consume in the production of my labor a business<br />
>>>>> expense?<br />
>><br />
>>>> You don&#8217;t know tax law very well.<br />
>><br />
>> You can claim those expenses.<br />
><br />
> No, a laborer cannot claim his or her food bill as a business<br />
> expense.</p>
<p>Neither can a stock holder&#8230;..</p>
<p></n></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/01/join-the-christian-coalitions-campaign-to-stop-taxpayer-funding-for-abortion-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Right Wing Republican Dogma Says That There Is NO Global Warming</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/27/right-wing-republican-dogma-says-that-there-is-no-global-warming/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/27/right-wing-republican-dogma-says-that-there-is-no-global-warming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 17:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=18414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 3/27/2011 2:31 PM, The Rightist wrote: > Anyone who says otherwise is a Marxist Leninist Collectivst who one day face > the consequences of your collectivist ways. > > From now on we all tell the same story, speak the same talking points and > cite the same bloggers so we know who our [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 3/27/2011 2:31 PM, The Rightist wrote:<br />
> Anyone who says otherwise is a Marxist Leninist Collectivst who one day face<br />
> the consequences of your collectivist ways.<br />
><br />
> From now on we all tell the same story, speak the same talking points and<br />
> cite the same bloggers so we know who our enemy is.   Anyone who is without<br />
> work is a socialist and will not be allowed to side with us.  That includes<br />
> you geriatric old loons sucking from your governmnet funded medicare and<br />
> social security.   :You lazy cocksuckers contribute nothing to the economy.<br />
><br />
><br />
><br />
><br />
That would include all Government workers and politicians&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/27/right-wing-republican-dogma-says-that-there-is-no-global-warming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National debt 14.2 trillion and increasing at over 4 billion a day!</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/26/national-debt-14-2-trillion-and-increasing-at-over-4-billion-a-day/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/26/national-debt-14-2-trillion-and-increasing-at-over-4-billion-a-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 20:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[owned]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=18372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 3/26/2011 4:28 PM, Sid9 wrote: > > &#8220;wy&#8221; wrote in message > news:05c332bb-4f94-4a6c-bec0-af6ceb3e2b62 @&#038;*$?%o30g2000pra.googlegroups.com&#8230; >> On Mar 26, 4:04 pm, John Smith wrote: >>> On 3/26/2011 12:47 PM, Sid9 wrote: >>> >>> > &#8230; >>> > Who are going to shoot? >>> > The debt is owned primarily by Americans. >>> >>> > What [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 3/26/2011 4:28 PM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
><br />
> &#8220;wy&#8221; <wy_ @myself.com> wrote in message<br />
> news:05c332bb-4f94-4a6c-bec0-af6ceb3e2b62<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>o30g2000pra.googlegroups.com&#8230;<br />
>> On Mar 26, 4:04 pm, John Smith <assemblywiz ...@gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>>> On 3/26/2011 12:47 PM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>> > &#8230;<br />
>>> > Who are going to shoot?<br />
>>> > The debt is owned primarily by Americans.<br />
>>><br />
>>> > What a dumbass na ve idea!<br />
>>><br />
>>> > You have proved that you belong in the Bozo Bin!<br />
>>><br />
>>> Actually, the debt is owed by banksters and the fed who have printed<br />
>>> money on promises to deliver something of value at a later date, knowing<br />
>>> full well this would never happen.<br />
>>><br />
>>> I really don&#8217;t owe any portion of the $45,000 they have me listed for,<br />
>>> neither do any of my children, or their young children!<br />
>><br />
>> Yet you have accepted all the services like rebuilding infrastructure,<br />
>> defense, whatever government programs you may&#8217;ve taken advantage of<br />
>> either knowingly or unknowingly and, of course, social security and<br />
>> medicare and medicaid should you get there if you haven&#8217;t already.<br />
>> Nothing&#8217;s free in the land of the free.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>><br />
>>> I say, &#8220;Let&#8217;s pay our debt in bullets!&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>> Bullets only go so far, then you&#8217;re out of them, and with no money to<br />
>> pay for more, America gets to be out of luck.<br />
>><br />
>>><br />
>>> And, as to your question, &#8220;Who are [you] going to shoot?&#8221;  I&#8217;d reply,<br />
>>> &#8220;Anyone coming to collect on the fictitious debt!&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>> Good luck if you think you can hold up against some bazookas or even<br />
>> be functional after a dozen tear gas grenades have been thrown through<br />
>> your windows.<br />
>><br />
>> It&#8217;s your simplistic nonsense that&#8217;ll only end up seeing you dead<br />
>> before your time.  Which wouldn&#8217;t be a bad thing.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
><br />
> The solution is simple&#8230;.but no one will face it.<br />
><br />
> 1. A wealth tax<br />
> 2. A truly progressive income tax<br />
><br />
> In other words tax where the money is.<br />
></p>
<p>Just where is the money, is it in the IQ or in the education or the<br />
buildings or the Song lyrics?   Some people have an education that has<br />
&#8220;value&#8221;  how will you tax that?   Some people have a talent that is of<br />
value, how will you tax that when they choose to not create a lyric?  Or<br />
they create a Lyric and sing it for a meal or a woman that has a talent<br />
for sex that rides in fine cars and eats fine foods, how will you tax<br />
that asset? If you tax a car or a house or gold or cash as an<br />
asset(money)  how will you be equal and tax these other assets that<br />
can&#8217;t be confiscated?   Why tax only some people and NOT others?</p>
<p>Your system lacks the &#8220;FAIR&#8221; part of what you are trying to achieve.<br />
These people with intangible assets from God can&#8217;t be taxed on their wealth.</p>
<p>> No use taxing poor people who have little money&#8230;they spend it all<br />
> anyway contributing to the GDP<br />
> Rich people do not.<br />
></p>
<p>Explain where the rich hide money so that it contributes zero to GDP.</p>
<p>It is Government and government employees that add zero to GDP,  they<br />
consume GDP.</p>
<p>> It&#8217;s time to pay the piper for the excesses that started with Republican<br />
> St Reagan, continued under HW Bush, and nearly finished us off with the<br />
> incompetent bush,jr.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s time to get rid of the Progressives yoke of oppression on the<br />
capitalist markets and the people and go back to creating wealth.</p>
<p></assemblywiz></wy_></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/26/national-debt-14-2-trillion-and-increasing-at-over-4-billion-a-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boner&#8217;s &#8220;BROKE&#8221; Talk Is Beyond Bullshit!</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/22/boners-broke-talk-is-beyond-bullshit-3/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/22/boners-broke-talk-is-beyond-bullshit-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GOVERNMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crazy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lamont Cranston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=18144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 3/21/2011 11:06 PM, Nickname unavailable wrote: > On Mar 21, 7:46 pm, snakehawk wrote: >> On Mar 21, 6:26 pm, Lamont Cranston wrote: >> >> >> >>> On 3/17/2011 7:37 PM, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: >> >>>> On 3/17/2011 7:28 PM, Nickname unavailable wrote: >>>>> On Mar 17, 5:35 pm, Lamont Cranston wrote: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 3/21/2011 11:06 PM, Nickname unavailable wrote:<br />
> On Mar 21, 7:46 pm, snakehawk <snakeh ...@MailAndNews.com> wrote:<br />
>> On Mar 21, 6:26 pm, Lamont Cranston <lamont .Crans...@Truth.org> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>> On 3/17/2011 7:37 PM, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>> On 3/17/2011 7:28 PM, Nickname unavailable wrote:<br />
>>>>> On Mar 17, 5:35 pm, Lamont Cranston</lamont><lamont .Crans...@Truth.org>  wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>>   thanks for posting the truth. seems conservatives/libertarians/<br />
>>>>> fascists hate free money. i cannot get one of them to go collect the<br />
>>>>> reward. its easy money, why do they pass it up:)<br />
>><br />
>>>> Who would believe a Liberal?<br />
>><br />
>>> Business Week is liberal?  ROTFL!!<br />
>><br />
>>> <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/investing/insights/blog/archives/2008/09/..." >http://www.businessweek.com/investing/insights/blog/archives/2008/09/&#8230;</a><br />
>><br />
>>> Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were victims, not culprits<br />
>><br />
>>> Posted by: Aaron Pressman on September 26, 2008<br />
>><br />
>>> There s a dangerous and misleading argument making the rounds about<br />
>>> the causes of our current credit crisis. It s emanating from Washington<br />
>>> where politicians are engaging in the usual blame game but this time the<br />
>>> stakes are so high that we can t afford to fall victim to political<br />
>>> doublespeak. In this fact-free zone, government sponsored mortgage<br />
>>> giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac caused the real estate bubble and<br />
>>> subprime meltdown. It s completely false. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac<br />
>>> were victims of the credit crisis, not culprits.<br />
>><br />
>>> Start with the most basic fact of all: virtually none of the $1.5<br />
>>> trillion of cratering subprime mortgages were backed by Fannie or<br />
>>> Freddie. That s right most subprime mortgages did not meet Fannie or<br />
>>> Freddie s strict lending standards. All those no money down, no interest<br />
>>> for a year, low teaser rate loans? All the loans made without checking a<br />
>>> borrower s income or employment history? All made in the private sector,<br />
>>> without any support from Fannie and Freddie.<br />
>><br />
>>> Look at the numbers. While the credit bubble was peaking from 2003 to<br />
>>> 2006, the amount of loans originated by Fannie and Freddie dropped from<br />
>>> $2.7 trillion to $1 trillion. Meanwhile, in the private sector, the<br />
>>> amount of subprime loans originated jumped to $600 billion from $335<br />
>>> billion and Alt-A loans hit $400 billion from $85 billion in 2003.<br />
>>> Fannie and Freddie, which wouldn t accept crazy floating rate loans,<br />
>>> which required income verification and minimum down payments, were left<br />
>>> out of the insanity.<br />
>><br />
>>> There s a must-read study by staff members of the Federal Reserve Bank<br />
>>> of New York analyzing the roots of the subprime crisis that came out in<br />
>>> March. I don t think it got much attention then as the conclusions<br />
>>> seemed uncontroversial at the time. But now that Washington politicians<br />
>>> are trying to rewrite history, it should be mandatory reading for every<br />
>>> American interested in knowing how we got here.<br />
>><br />
>>> The study identifies five causes of the subprime meltdown:<br />
>>> -Convoluted loan products that consumers didn t understand.<br />
>>> -Credit ratings that didn t do a good job highlighting the risks<br />
>>> contained in subprime-backed securities.<br />
>>> -Lack of incentives for institutional investors to do their own research<br />
>>> (they just relied on the credit ratings).<br />
>>> -Predatory lending and borrowing (which I think means fraud perpetrated<br />
>>> by borrowers).<br />
>>> -Significant errors in the models used by credit rating agencies to<br />
>>> assess subprime-backed securities.<br />
>><br />
>>> You ll note in the Fed s five causes that there s some culpability for<br />
>>> lenders, borrowers, investors and credit raters. There s no blame for<br />
>>> Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae which had little or nothing to do with the<br />
>>> entire situation.<br />
>><br />
>>> It s certainly fair to criticize Fannie and Freddie over real issues<br />
>>> that contributed to their downfall. The companies had numerous<br />
>>> accounting problems and inadequate safeguards covering their own<br />
>>> investment portfolios. Those weaknesses came home to roost when the real<br />
>>> estate market cratered. Fannie and Freddie purchased billions of dollars<br />
>>> of subprime-backed securities for their own investment portfolios and<br />
>>> got hit just like every other investor. But it s some kind of crazy,<br />
>>> politically inspired CYA to blame for the mess we re in.<br />
>><br />
>> Blaming Fannie and Freddie for the almost total collapse of the US<br />
>> financial industry is popular, especially among Wall Street bankers<br />
>> and their paid media hacks, because it diverts attention away from the<br />
>> real culprits&#8211;the Wall Street Bankers.<br />
>><br />
>> The clever bankers were simply using the mortgages as poker chips in<br />
>> the biggest heist in US history. The bankers devised complicated<br />
>> financial instruments like Credit Default Swaps, Collateralized debt<br />
>> obligations, and even synthetic CDOs, and sold the paper to<br />
>> unsuspecting investors as though the worthless instruments had real<br />
>> value backing them. When the investors demanded payment, there wasn&#8217;t<br />
>> enough money in the world to cover the debts.<br />
>><br />
>> Company executives took out millions in bonuses and dumped the whole<br />
>> mess into the government&#8217;s lap.  Whenever you run across an article<br />
>> about the financial collapse that doesn&#8217;t even mention Credit Default<br />
>> Swaps and the like, you can be sure it was written by some Wall Street<br />
>> hooker earning his keep by smokescreening the Wall Street<br />
>> manipulations.<br />
><br />
>  well said, and look at what they did to pension funds. now they blame<br />
> the workers. that way, stupid people will then bark and bray that, and<br />
> the workers will get the shaft. then its off to social security, and<br />
> stupid people will bark and bray the conservative/libertarian/fascist<br />
> line on that to, and we will lose social security.</p>
<p><a href="http://outsourcenews.net/j-news/content/view/212/126/" >http://outsourcenews.net/j-news/content/view/212/126/</a><br />
time 6:30 on the video watch Obama explain how &#8220;he&#8221;  wanted to<br />
*redistribute* risk.</p>
<p><a href="http://outsourcenews.net/j-news/content/view/198/54/" >http://outsourcenews.net/j-news/content/view/198/54/</a><br />
Here is the future being told, back in 1999.  People saw it coming.</p>
<p>Obama and Progressives in congress created the straw that broke the<br />
camels back.   The Fannie Mae mess was created by *GOVERNMENT* and yes<br />
that created problems for the private sector, that&#8217;s what government does.</p>
<p></lamont></snakeh></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/22/boners-broke-talk-is-beyond-bullshit-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;That&#8217;s Not Theirs, That&#8217;s A National Resource, It&#8217;s Ours&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/20/thats-not-theirs-thats-a-national-resource-its-ours/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/20/thats-not-theirs-thats-a-national-resource-its-ours/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 17:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=18067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 3/20/2011 11:18 AM, Obveeus wrote: > &#8220;Mason Barge&#8221; wrote: > >> I also think they lowering of taxes on stock dividends below the rate for >> earned income is a&#038;*$?%s-backwards. I can remember when earned income was >> taxed at the lowest rate of any income, which seems to me to reflect the >> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 3/20/2011 11:18 AM, Obveeus wrote:<br />
> &#8220;Mason Barge&#8221; <masonbarge @gmail.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> I also think they lowering of taxes on stock dividends below the rate for<br />
>> earned income is <acronym title="ass"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> a&*$?%s</span></acronym>-backwards.  I can remember when earned income was<br />
>> taxed at the lowest rate of any income, which seems to me to reflect the<br />
>> traditional values of America.<br />
><br />
> I agree, but what I&#8217;d really like to see happen is a &#8216;sales&#8217; tax of sort on<br />
> stocks.  Something akin to the backend load on a mutual fund.  Any time a<br />
> person sells any stock, apply a 5% sales tax.  That would encourage people<br />
> to actually invest in companies rather than &#8216;play the market&#8217; because people<br />
> would be encouraged to actually make long term investments in a company&#8217;s<br />
> future.</p>
<p>The entire tax system should be the same&#8230;.  tax on new Items so that<br />
people use things really want or need them, NOT a tax on working and<br />
earning but on wasting.  A 10% sales tax on new items with a limiting<br />
twist that says any raise in tax will be allowed with a cut across the<br />
board of three times that by all Federal spending.  That way a 1% tax<br />
increase will result in a 3% Federal wide spending cut&#8230;..</p>
<p>33% sales tax increase would mean a 99% spending reduction across the<br />
Board. That would put government out of business.</p>
<p>*And give America back to Americans*</p>
<p>Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression.</p>
<p>End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
prostitutes when there are so many legal tax paying prostitutes out there?</p>
<p><a href="http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs--crime-usage-falls" >http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs&#8211;crime-usage-falls</a></p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED<br />
money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad. All electronic money leaving the USA would be debited the<br />
Sales tax when the money is sent/spent.</p>
<p>The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drug smuggling less*<br />
*profitable* as would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL<br />
“NEW ITEM” SALES TAX *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE<br />
DRUG DEALERS and illegals by making their tax free money leaving the<br />
country even more valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the RED money<br />
for GREEN money then you would charge the sales tax at that point.</p>
<p>Have the States Ratify an amendment withdrawing the 16th amendment&#8230;<br />
Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (Federal sales<br />
tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED TAX* with the same amendment that<br />
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a Federal *NEW ITEM* sales tax.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
*GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add to<br />
the amendment that if congress raises sales tax by 1% they are forced to<br />
cut every single expenditure of the government by 3% evenly.</p>
<p>Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
of our military bases along the southern Border to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the Border patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
Federal trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases.</p>
<p>This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
outside the USA. That will make it harder for smugglers to get money out<br />
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch smugglers. We<br />
are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
borrow like income tax does.</p>
<p>This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less welfare and charge them<br />
tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>Pass an amendment to the constitution that makes all<br />
*laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.</p>
<p>There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. And a<br />
constitutional amendment to limit the Interstate Commerce Clause. The<br />
politicians use that clause to justify all sorts of socialist <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>. The<br />
founding fathers never meant for it to be so broadly applied. Limit it<br />
with an amendment, so government can&#8217;t justify every crazy Socialist<br />
idea by saying its legal under the interstate commerce clause.</p>
<p>Pass another amendment creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP CONGRESS FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING MONEY. The way to limit<br />
some of the Presidents spending is to put an amendment in the<br />
constitution, and limit the Executive branch to 1% of the Nations income<br />
for foreign aid. That should reduce the Presidents buying of other<br />
Nations &#8220;friendship&#8221;.</p>
<p>To quit filling the jails with people over *social taboos* , we need to<br />
take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;social engineer&#8221; the businesses or the<br />
private people by removing the governments use of tax code to manipulate<br />
people. Getting rid of the Income tax and IRS as suggested above will do<br />
that.</p>
<p>Government needs to spend 10% less every year until they meet the<br />
income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
force an across the board spending freeze and then across the board cuts<br />
on the government spending, to do that we have to include a law in our<br />
TAX amendment to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
federal sales tax increase would result in automatic spending cuts using<br />
a baseline of 10% taxes.</p>
<p>And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
them fight their own fights. We also need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
committing(fewer laws), we need fewer police and prisons to support&#8230;.<br />
and the above drug and tax plan, will reduce police and prison needs by<br />
at least that 10% that this plan suggested cutting each year.</p>
<p>NO welfare to corporations, and cut welfare to private people by 10%<br />
each year until it is 10% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
in DEEP for a long time.</p>
<p></masonbarge></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/20/thats-not-theirs-thats-a-national-resource-its-ours/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Such economic illiteracy</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/28/such-economic-illiteracy/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/28/such-economic-illiteracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=17268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 2/28/2011 10:13 AM, Colonel Kurtz wrote: > On 27-Feb-2011, No Surrender @&#038;*$?%never.net wrote: > >> FROM AMERICAN THINKER >> >> HEAD: Raising taxes will create jobs: AFL-CIO chief >> >> SUB-HEAD: Such economic illiteracy is unusual, even for a labor union >> chief: >> By Rick Moran >> >> >> What&#8217;s the best way [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 2/28/2011 10:13 AM, Colonel Kurtz wrote:<br />
> On 27-Feb-2011, No <a href="mailto:Surrender<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>never.net">Surrender<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>never.net</a> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> FROM AMERICAN THINKER<br />
>><br />
>> HEAD: Raising taxes will create jobs: AFL-CIO chief<br />
>><br />
>> SUB-HEAD: Such economic illiteracy is unusual, even for a labor union<br />
>> chief:<br />
>> By Rick Moran<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> What&#8217;s the best way to get Americans back to work?</p>
<p>*HOW TO ALLOW AMERICA TO SURVIVE*<br />
And give America back to Americans</p>
<p>Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression.</p>
<p>End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
prostitutes when there are so many legal tax paying prostitutes out there?</p>
<p><a href="http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs--crime-usage-falls" >http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs&#8211;crime-usage-falls</a></p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED<br />
money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad. All electronic money leaving the USA would be debited the<br />
Sales tax when the money is sent/spent.</p>
<p>The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drug smuggling less*<br />
*profitable* as would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL<br />
“NEW ITEM” SALES TAX *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE<br />
DRUG DEALERS and illegals by making their tax free money leaving the<br />
country even more valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the RED money<br />
for GREEN money then you would charge the sales tax at that point.</p>
<p>Have the States Ratify an amendment withdrawing the 16th amendment&#8230;<br />
Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (Federal sales<br />
tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED TAX* with the same amendment that<br />
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a Federal *NEW ITEM* sales tax.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
*GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add to<br />
the amendment that if congress raises sales tax by 1% they are forced to<br />
cut every single expenditure of the government by 3%.</p>
<p>Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
of our military bases along the southern Border to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the Border patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
Federal trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases.</p>
<p>This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
outside the USA. That will make it harder for smugglers to get money out<br />
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch smugglers. We<br />
are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
borrow like income tax does.</p>
<p>This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less welfare and charge them<br />
tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>Pass an amendment to the constitution that makes all<br />
*laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.</p>
<p>There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. And a<br />
constitutional amendment to limit the Interstate Commerce Clause. The<br />
politicians use that clause to justify all sorts of socialist <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>. The<br />
founding fathers never meant for it to be so broadly applied. Limit it<br />
with an amendment, so government can&#8217;t justify every crazy Socialist<br />
idea by saying its legal under the interstate commerce clause.</p>
<p>Pass another amendment creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP CONGRESS FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING MONEY. The way to limit<br />
some of the Presidents spending is to put an amendment in the<br />
constitution, and limit the Executive branch to 1% of the Nations income<br />
for foreign aid. That should reduce the Presidents buying of other<br />
Nations &#8220;friendship&#8221;.</p>
<p>To quit filling the jails with people over *social taboos* , we need to<br />
take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;social engineer&#8221; the businesses or the<br />
private people by removing the governments use of tax code to manipulate<br />
people. Getting rid of the Income tax and IRS as suggested above will do<br />
that.</p>
<p>Government needs to spend 10% less every year until they meet the<br />
income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
force an across the board spending freeze and then across the board cuts<br />
on the government spending, to do that we have to include a law in our<br />
TAX amendment to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
federal sales tax increase would result in automatic spending cuts using<br />
a baseline of 10% taxes.</p>
<p>And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
them fight their own fights. We also need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
committing(fewer laws), we need fewer police and prisons to support&#8230;.<br />
and the above drug and tax plan, will reduce police and prison needs by<br />
at least that 10% that this plan suggested cutting each year.</p>
<p>NO welfare to corporations, and cut welfare to private people by 10%<br />
each year until it is 10% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
in DEEP for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/28/such-economic-illiteracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Administration Drops Defense of Discriminatory DOMA Law</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/24/administration-drops-defense-of-discriminatory-doma-law/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/24/administration-drops-defense-of-discriminatory-doma-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 23:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[text]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=17165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 2/24/2011 2:33 PM, Oz wrote: >> >> I would like to pass social security benefits to my dog. Should we have sex >> to qualify? >> &#8211; Show quoted text - > > Only if you marry the dog. Same sex? Doesn&#8217;t matter? A neighbor of > mine wants to marry his oak tree. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 2/24/2011 2:33 PM, Oz wrote:<br />
>><br />
>> I would like to pass social security benefits to my dog. Should we have sex<br />
>> to qualify?<br />
>> &#8211; Show quoted text -<br />
><br />
> Only if you marry the dog.  Same sex?  Doesn&#8217;t matter?  A neighbor of<br />
> mine wants to marry his oak tree.  What could be wrong with that?</p>
<p>To consummate you have to have vaginal penetration, so your dog/partner<br />
can&#8217;t be same sex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/24/administration-drops-defense-of-discriminatory-doma-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rethugs to terminate both PBS &amp; NPR. Fat chance</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/22/rethugs-to-terminate-both-pbs-npr-fat-chance-18/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/22/rethugs-to-terminate-both-pbs-npr-fat-chance-18/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 21:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=17051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 2/18/2011 3:53 PM, Jeff M wrote: > On 2/17/2011 5:07 PM, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: >> >>> F. George McDuffee wrote in >>> news:p3sll65fs00m2dcv48sidvbc673g7qdkvm @&#038;*$?%4ax.com: >>> >>>> One serious problem with highly unequal incomes is this >>>> creates several classes of people with very different world >>>> views/perceptions resulting in social instability. >> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 2/18/2011 3:53 PM, Jeff M wrote:<br />
> On 2/17/2011 5:07 PM, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>> F. George McDuffee<gmcduffee @mcduffee-associates.us>  wrote in<br />
>>> news:p3sll65fs00m2dcv48sidvbc673g7qdkvm<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>4ax.com:<br />
>>><br />
>>>> One serious problem with highly unequal incomes is this<br />
>>>> creates several classes of people with very different world<br />
>>>> views/perceptions resulting in social instability.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> In your Progressive world, DIVERSITY is bad?<br />
><br />
> It kinda depends on what kind of &#8220;diversity&#8221; you&#8217;re talking about.  If<br />
> the diversity of your community is measured in the percentage of, say,<br />
> child molesters, homicidal maniacs, Ebola carriers and cannibals,<br />
> diversity my not be such a god thing.</p>
<p>So a concentration of 90% of people with Ebola is better than a few<br />
cases of everything?</p>
<p></gmcduffee></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/22/rethugs-to-terminate-both-pbs-npr-fat-chance-18/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rethugs to terminate both PBS &amp; NPR. Fat chance</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/17/rethugs-to-terminate-both-pbs-npr-fat-chance-9/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/17/rethugs-to-terminate-both-pbs-npr-fat-chance-9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 23:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=16960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[> F. George McDuffee wrote in > news:p3sll65fs00m2dcv48sidvbc673g7qdkvm @&#038;*$?%4ax.com: > >> One serious problem with highly unequal incomes is this >> creates several classes of people with very different world >> views/perceptions resulting in social instability. In your Progressive world, DIVERSITY is bad?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> F. George McDuffee <gmcduffee @mcduffee-associates.us> wrote in<br />
> news:p3sll65fs00m2dcv48sidvbc673g7qdkvm<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>4ax.com:<br />
><br />
>> One serious problem with highly unequal incomes is this<br />
>> creates several classes of people with very different world<br />
>> views/perceptions resulting in social instability.</p>
<p>In your Progressive world, DIVERSITY is bad?</p>
<p></gmcduffee></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/17/rethugs-to-terminate-both-pbs-npr-fat-chance-9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rethugs to terminate both PBS &amp; NPR. Fat chance</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/15/rethugs-to-terminate-both-pbs-npr-fat-chance-4/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/15/rethugs-to-terminate-both-pbs-npr-fat-chance-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=16908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 2/15/2011 9:56 AM, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: > On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:03:15 -0500, &#8220;Scout&#8221; > wrote: > >> However, you have my attention, so tell me what programs YOU think we >> should be cutting to save money, and they can not be anything that helps >> regular middle class and poor Americans. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 2/15/2011 9:56 AM, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:<br />
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:03:15 -0500, &#8220;Scout&#8221;<br />
> <me4guns @verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> However, you have my attention, so tell me what programs YOU think we<br />
>> should be cutting to save money, and they can not be anything that helps<br />
>> regular middle class and poor Americans.<br />
><br />
> &#8211; Abolish foreign aid.<br />
> &#8211; Cut military spending 15% per year for eight years.<br />
> &#8211; Abolish progressive taxation.<br />
> &#8211; Abolish tax incentives, deductions, exemptions, exclusions and credits.<br />
> &#8211; Abolish farm subsidies &#038; raise tariffs.<br />
> &#8211; Abolish NAFTA and GATT &#038; raise tariffs.<br />
> &#8211; Close most foreign military bases.<br />
> &#8211; Halt the use of our military to enforce failed foreign diplomacy.<br />
> &#8211; Leave Iraq yesterday.<br />
> &#8211; Leave Afghanistan the day before that.<br />
><br />
> for starters&#8230;<br />
><br />
Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression.</p>
<p>End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
prostitutes when there are so many legal tax paying prostitutes out there?</p>
<p><a href="http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs--crime-usage-falls" >http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs&#8211;crime-usage-falls</a></p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED<br />
money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad. All electronic money leaving the USA would be debited the<br />
Sales tax when the money is sent/spent.</p>
<p>The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drug smuggling less*<br />
*profitable* as would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL<br />
“NEW ITEM” SALES TAX *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE<br />
DRUG DEALERS and illegals by making their tax free money leaving the<br />
country even more valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the RED money<br />
for GREEN money then you would charge the sales tax at that point.</p>
<p>Have the States Ratify an amendment withdrawing the 16th amendment&#8230;<br />
Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (Federal sales<br />
tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED TAX* with the same amendment that<br />
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a Federal *NEW ITEM* sales tax.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
*GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add to<br />
the amendment that if congress raises sales tax by 1% they are forced to<br />
cut every single expenditure of the government by 3%.</p>
<p>Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
of our military bases along the southern Border to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the Border patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
Federal trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases.</p>
<p>This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
outside the USA. That will make it harder for smugglers to get money out<br />
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch smugglers. We<br />
are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
borrow like income tax does.</p>
<p>This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less welfare and charge them<br />
tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>Pass an amendment to the constitution that makes all<br />
*laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.</p>
<p>There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. And a<br />
constitutional amendment to limit the Interstate Commerce Clause. The<br />
politicians use that clause to justify all sorts of socialist <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>. The<br />
founding fathers never meant for it to be so broadly applied. Limit it<br />
with an amendment, so government can&#8217;t justify every crazy Socialist<br />
idea by saying its legal under the interstate commerce clause.</p>
<p>Pass another amendment creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP CONGRESS FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING MONEY. The way to limit<br />
some of the Presidents spending is to put an amendment in the<br />
constitution, and limit the Executive branch to 1% of the Nations income<br />
for foreign aid. That should reduce the Presidents buying of other<br />
Nations &#8220;friendship&#8221;.</p>
<p>To quit filling the jails with people over *social taboos* , we need to<br />
take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;social engineer&#8221; the businesses or the<br />
private people by removing the governments use of tax code to manipulate<br />
people. Getting rid of the Income tax and IRS as suggested above will do<br />
that.</p>
<p>Government needs to spend 10% less every year until they meet the<br />
income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
force an across the board spending freeze and then across the board cuts<br />
on the government spending, to do that we have to include a law in our<br />
TAX amendment to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
federal sales tax increase would result in automatic spending cuts using<br />
a baseline of 10% taxes.</p>
<p>And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
them fight their own fights. We also need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
committing(fewer laws), we need fewer police and prisons to support&#8230;.<br />
and the above drug and tax plan, will reduce police and prison needs by<br />
at least that 10% that this plan suggested cutting each year.</p>
<p>NO welfare to corporations, and cut welfare to WE THE PEOPLE by 10%<br />
each year until it is 10% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
in DEEP for a long time.</p>
<p></me4guns></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/15/rethugs-to-terminate-both-pbs-npr-fat-chance-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Human Rights,-</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/10/human-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/10/human-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=16774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*SOCIALIST* 2008-2009 Platform: Human Rights - L&#038;*$?%n, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Q&#038;*$?%r People The Socialist Party recognizes the human and civil rights of all, without regard to sexual orientation. 1. We call for the end of all anti-gay, l&#038;*$?%n, bisexual, and transgender (GLBTQ) restrictions in law and the work place, the repeal of all sodomy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*SOCIALIST*<br />
2008-2009 Platform: Human Rights<br />
-<br />
<acronym title="Lesbian"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> L&*$?%n</span></acronym>, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and <acronym title="Queer"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> Q&*$?%r</span></acronym> People<br />
The Socialist Party recognizes the human and civil rights of all,<br />
without regard to sexual orientation.</p>
<p>1.  We call for the end of all anti-gay, <acronym title="lesbian"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> l&*$?%n</span></acronym>, bisexual, and<br />
transgender (GLBTQ) restrictions in law and the work place, the repeal<br />
of all sodomy laws, and the legalization of same-sex marriage.</p>
<p>2.  We call on all schools to adopt policies and procedures to address<br />
and prevent student violence and to ban discrimination against GLBTQ<br />
people throughout the educational system.</p>
<p>3. We call for a federal ban on all forms of job discrimination on the<br />
basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.</p>
<p>4.  We are committed to confronting the heterosexism that provides the<br />
fertile ground for homophobic violence, and support all efforts toward<br />
fostering understanding and cooperation among persons and groups of<br />
differing sexual orientations.</p>
<p>People of Color<br />
The Socialist Party recognizes the intimate link between racism and<br />
capitalism and demands the elimination of all forms of discrimination in<br />
housing, jobs, education, health care, etc.  We are committed to the<br />
creation of a pluralistic society that defends and promotes a<br />
multicultural/multiethnic presence in both the public and private<br />
spheres. The Socialist Party rejects the social construction of race and<br />
we commit ourselves to the eradication of racism.</p>
<p>1.  We strongly support affirmative action, civil rights, and<br />
anti-discrimination laws and programs to end institutional racism.</p>
<p>2. We call for reparations from the federal government for its role in<br />
the slave trade and the genocide of Native American nations, with the<br />
reparations programs administered by the oppressed communities themselves.</p>
<p>3.  We support the efforts of people of color to self-defense,<br />
self-determination, and to organize independently for their liberation.</p>
<p>4.  We oppose all efforts to declare English an official language, and<br />
call for an end to all language discrimination.  We demand that all<br />
public and private institutions provide services and materials in the<br />
languages of their communities.</p>
<p>5. We call for enforcement of Native American treaty rights, support for<br />
tribal schools and colleges, living wages on Native American<br />
reservations, and democratization of power and wealth in tribal governments.</p>
<p>6.  We call for strict legal penalties for the police practice of racial<br />
profiling, and we particularly condemn the targeting of Arabs and<br />
Muslims since September 11.</p>
<p>7.  We demand an end to police brutality and all forms of harassment<br />
against people of color and ethnic minorities.</p>
<p>People with Disabilities<br />
The Socialist Party recognizes the human and civil rights of all,<br />
without regard to physical or psychological differences.  We deplore<br />
media stereotypes that focus on a person&#8217;s disability rather than on<br />
their strengths and abilities, and the physical and social barriers that<br />
prevent the full participation by people with disabilities in vital<br />
spheres of life.</p>
<p>1.  We call for full enforcement of all sections of the Americans with<br />
Disabilities Act so that all public and private buildings, facilities,<br />
and modes of transportation are accessible to disabled people, and every<br />
effort is made to employ persons with disabilities.</p>
<p>2.  We oppose any effort to limit the protections of the Americans with<br />
Disabilities Act by restricting the definition of who is considered a<br />
person with a disability, and we call for an amendment to the act that<br />
would permit punitive damages for the complainants in ADA cases.</p>
<p>3.   We call for enforcement of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of<br />
1973 that mandates equal employment practices and physical accessibility<br />
for entities receiving federal funding; and call for the removal of the<br />
prohibition against the right of private action presently contained in<br />
Section 504.</p>
<p>4.  We call for full funding for a network of support for people with<br />
physical, mental, and developmental disabilities, including home<br />
assistance, recreation centers, guaranteed income, voting access, and<br />
quality control in residential facilities; and for the inclusion of<br />
people with disabilities on all local and state governing boards and<br />
commissions.</p>
<p>5.  We call for the continuation of full Social Security benefits for<br />
people with disabilities who are able to work part-time, and affirmative<br />
action quotas for hiring people with disabilities at union wages.</p>
<p>6. We oppose any efforts of the federal government to further limit<br />
access to SSDI (Supplemental Security Disability Income Insurance) by<br />
restricting their definitions of who is considered a person with a<br />
disability..</p>
<p>7.  We call for the full funding of high-quality education and training<br />
programs for people with disabilities, and an expansion of the<br />
Individuals With Disabilities In Education Act (IDEA) which would<br />
include greater funding for the hiring of paraprofessionals in public<br />
schools.</p>
<p>8.  We call for an amendment of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) to<br />
include a prohibition against the denial of credit based on disability.</p>
<p>Seniors<br />
The Socialist Party recognizes the right of seniors to a dignified life,<br />
free from economic hardship, social isolation, and discrimination in<br />
employment and credit.   Sufficient income, housing, health care,<br />
medication, and access to social services must be guaranteed to all elders.</p>
<p>1.  We oppose the privatization of the Social Security system and the<br />
use of Social Security trust funds for any other purpose, such as<br />
offsetting the federal deficit.</p>
<p>2.   We demand that the Social Security system remain entirely within<br />
the public sector, with funding derived from a steeply graduated income<br />
tax on all income, earned and unearned.</p>
<p>3.  We call for the inclusion of all state and local government workers<br />
within the Social Security System.</p>
<p>4.   We call for the right of retirement at age 55 a minimum annual<br />
retirement income of $25,000, tax free, and protected from inflation by<br />
cost of living increases.</p>
<p>5.  We call for a cap on Social Security benefits so that no beneficiary<br />
receives more than three times the income of those receiving the minimum.</p>
<p>6.  We support an increase in home service, including home-delivered<br />
quality meals and the provision of personal aid devices and physical<br />
therapy, so that older people can remain independent in their homes and<br />
community.</p>
<p>7.  We call for jobs and training for seniors who do not wish to retire.</p>
<p>8.  We support the formation of publicly funded and democratically<br />
controlled senior centers that provide opportunities for social and<br />
recreational activities and community involvement.</p>
<p>9. We call for the election of advocates and ombudspersons by assemblies<br />
of seniors and caregivers to ensure the protection of residents’ rights<br />
in nursing homes and a stimulating environment in group and nursing home<br />
situations.</p>
<p>10.  We support hospice care, and a person&#8217;s right to die with dignity<br />
in a manner of their choosing.</p>
<p>Women<br />
The Socialist Party is a socialist feminist organization that recognizes<br />
that a struggle against habitual male dominance and patriarchy must go<br />
hand in hand with any struggle against capitalism.  Therefore, we pledge<br />
our opposition to all forms of sexism, and demand equality in all<br />
aspects of life.</p>
<p>1. We demand full support for every woman&#8217;s right to choose when, if,<br />
and how to have children, including the right to free abortion on demand<br />
at any stage of pregnancy, without interference or coercion.  Clinics<br />
providing abortion services must have the full protection of the law.</p>
<p>2.  We call for the repeal of the Hyde Amendment and all other<br />
legislation that limits access to abortion services, thus denying &#8220;the<br />
right to choose&#8221; to millions of women, particularly low-income women,<br />
women of color, and young women.  We demand full reproductive freedom<br />
for all women by removing all discriminating barriers to reproductive<br />
rights and reproductive health care.</p>
<p>3.  We call for the banning of all involuntary sterilizations.  We<br />
oppose the performing of any medical research or medical procedure<br />
without a woman&#8217;s full knowledge and consent.</p>
<p>4.  We demand that local governments place a priority on preventing<br />
violence toward women, with coordinated programs to educate, provide<br />
shelter for women and children, and vigorously protect women from their<br />
abusers.</p>
<p>5. We call for the decriminalization of prostitution and demand that sex<br />
workers, just like all women workers, are guaranteed a full range of<br />
health, social, and legal services; and working conditions free from<br />
harassment, violence, and exploitation</p>
<p>6.  We call for 16 months paid leave to be shared by new parents or in<br />
its entirety by a single parent, and the expansion and full-funding of<br />
high-quality child care facilities.</p>
<p>7. We support comprehensive educational and training opportunities,<br />
comparable worth laws, and affirmative action for women.  We believe<br />
that women should be able to enter any occupation they choose, without<br />
hindrance.</p>
<p>8.  We believe that women should be free to improve their working lives<br />
through unions and other organizations, and that work at home, including<br />
child care, should be shared to enable women to fully participate in<br />
society.</p>
<p>9.  We call for organizational structure based on mutual consideration<br />
and respect, rotating leadership, gender balance, and processes that<br />
welcome and enable open and equitable participation in discussion and<br />
decision-making.</p>
<p>Youth<br />
The Socialist Party believes that the right of all children to<br />
nurturing, protection, and education by caring adults must be staunchly<br />
upheld, and that a young person does not have fewer rights because he or<br />
she is a minor.  Therefore, we believe that all Constitutional and human<br />
rights belonging to older people belong to younger people as well, and<br />
must be defended with equal vigor and determination</p>
<p>1) We support the immediate ratification by the United States of the UN<br />
Convention on the Rights of the Child.</p>
<p>2) We call for children&#8217;s allowances that will help ensure that every<br />
child&#8217;s basic rights and needs are satisfied in a stimulating,<br />
empowering, and caring environment.</p>
<p>3. We support free, quality care and education for all children and<br />
young people, federally financed and community controlled through<br />
democratically elected local boards that will include youth members.</p>
<p>4. We support the rights of minors to be free of any kind of child abuse<br />
or neglect whether physical, mental, emotional, or sexual.</p>
<p>5. We oppose measures that increase responsibilities and penalties on<br />
youth ostensibly to curb crime.</p>
<p>6. We call for an end to military draft registration, and an end to<br />
military recruiting in educational institutions.</p>
<p>7. We call for the abolition of parent consent and notification laws for<br />
reproductive health services, including abortion.</p>
<p>8. We call for the right to comprehensive sex education in school that<br />
includes birth control methods, STD protection, and information about<br />
being GLBTQ.</p>
<p>9. We call for the lowering of the voting age to 15</p>
<p>10.  We oppose age-based curfew laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/10/human-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats sing that same old song</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/05/democrats-sing-that-same-old-song-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/05/democrats-sing-that-same-old-song-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 02:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoorghis Jurgis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=16620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 2/5/2011 10:16 AM, Yoorghis @&#038;*$?%Jurgis.net wrote: > On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 21:59:36 -0800 (PST), &#8220;r_c_brown @&#038;*$?%hushmail.com&#8221; > wrote: > >> Of course, the South was not alone with respect to sterilization >> programs. Reportedly, &#8220;[t]he state of California was at the vanguard >> of the American eugenics movement, performing about 20,000 >> sterilizations [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 2/5/2011 10:16 AM, <a href="mailto:Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net">Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
> On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 21:59:36 -0800 (PST), &#8220;r_c_brown<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>hushmail.com&#8221;<br />
> <r_c_brown @hushmail.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> Of course, the South was not alone with respect to sterilization<br />
>> programs.  Reportedly, &#8220;[t]he state of California was at the vanguard<br />
>> of the American eugenics movement, performing about 20,000<br />
>> sterilizations or one third of the 60,000 nationwide from 1909 up<br />
>> until the 1960s.&#8221;<br />
><br />
><br />
> The south directed the policies at blacks<br />
><br />
> True, many states used sterlizations&#8212;but the south had the<br />
> motivation of racial hatred.</p>
<p>Are you sure sterilization wasn&#8217;t done in &#8220;the South&#8221; under the same<br />
guise that today&#8217;s Democrat-Liberals use to promote abortions or to ban<br />
people from &#8220;smoking outside&#8221;, or eating what they please in a<br />
restaurant or listening to what ever news they select or buying health<br />
insurance when they decide they can afford it?</p>
<p>That being the old Democrat-Liberal standard of;<br />
*It&#8217;s for the public good*</p>
<p>You seem to think that anything Democrat-Liberals want is OK as long as<br />
it&#8217;s justified with &#8220;it&#8217;s for the public good&#8221;  right down to the point<br />
of eugenics through abortions and any other cause you have.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m saying that &#8220;the south&#8221; in those years you point at when<br />
sterilization happened was predominantly Democrats.</p>
<p>And today you Democrat-Liberals use the same justification and now you<br />
blame everyone else for your past.  All you need to do is look at you<br />
Liberals today and in the past to see the fact that you haven&#8217;t changed.</p>
<p>You still discriminate against people by their skin color to implement<br />
&#8220;your&#8221; social aspirations.  What else would you call affirmative action<br />
other than race based outcomes?<br />
<a href="http://www.newsmax.com/US/obama-race-college-admissions/2010/03/31/id/354391" >http://www.newsmax.com/US/obama-race-college-admissions/2010/03/31/id/354391</a></p>
<p>You see&#8230;.  it&#8217;s you Libs that use &#8220;it&#8217;s for the public good&#8221; to do<br />
what ever you think is best at any given moment, rather than actually<br />
respecting the constitution and having a consistent government of laws.</p>
<p></r_c_brown></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/05/democrats-sing-that-same-old-song-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How would you define socialism?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/01/29/how-would-you-define-socialism/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/01/29/how-would-you-define-socialism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 16:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black-Liberation-Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=16363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/28/2011 11:40 PM, Ron Peterson wrote: &#62; On Jan 22, 11:11 pm, Matthew Young wrote: &#62;&#62; I think the most basic definition that I could come up with was that &#62;&#62; socialism is a form of organized society where the workers own the means &#62;&#62; of production &#8211; but that seems a little antiquated [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/28/2011 11:40 PM, Ron Peterson wrote:<br />
&gt; On Jan 22, 11:11 pm, Matthew Young  wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt; I think the most basic definition that I could come up with was that<br />
&gt;&gt; socialism is a form of organized society where the workers own the means<br />
&gt;&gt; of production &#8211; but that seems a little antiquated in today&#8217;s world. (at<br />
&gt;&gt; least as a full definition)<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; That does seem to be a difficult definition since it describes a way<br />
&gt; to implement instead of what is desired.</p>
<p>NOT to mention the social taboos of saying things directly&#8230;.  Under<br />
<a href='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/socialism/' rel='tag' class="hashtag">#Socialism</a> you have to dance around the truth and say things using polite<br />
euphemism and NewSpeak from the Orwellian book 1984.</p>
<p>Socialism is implemented via their control over the people&#8230;..</p>
<p>The resulting Socialist society is a <a href='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/mediocracy/' rel='tag' class="hashtag">#Mediocracy </a>, where every aspect<br />
of life is to seek the lowest common denominator so that Socialists can<br />
pretend that somehow we &#8220;are&#8221; all equal.</p>
<p>Truth is we&#8217;re NOT equal, just born equal and can be treated equal by<br />
the government the rest of life is a craps-shoot. And it&#8217;s NOT natural<br />
for us to dumb down to the lowest common denominator and be happy with<br />
stagnation.</p>
<p>Liberals and progressives are anything but about making progress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/01/29/how-would-you-define-socialism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ignorant, Gullible Rightist Slaves Gobble Up Corporate Lies About Canada&#8217;s Health Care</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/01/26/ignorant-gullible-rightist-slaves-gobble-up-corporate-lies-about-canadas-health-care-9/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/01/26/ignorant-gullible-rightist-slaves-gobble-up-corporate-lies-about-canadas-health-care-9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 03:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the poor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=16299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/26/2011 7:22 PM, ray wrote: > In article &#60;4D3F25DD.2090006 @&#038;*$?%Blackhole.NebulaX.com>, > Beam Me Up Scotty > wrote: > >> On 1/25/2011 2:19 PM, J&#038;*$?%a wrote: >>> >>> >>> &#8220;ray&#8221; wrote in message news:ihlaet01r4a @&#038;*$?%news6.newsguy.com&#8230; >>> >>> In article , >>> &#8220; J&#038;*$?%a&#8221; wrote: >>> >>>> &#8220;ray&#8221; wrote in message news:ihijoe05ak @&#038;*$?%news6.newsguy.com&#8230; >>>> >>>> In [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/26/2011 7:22 PM, ray wrote:<br />
> In article &lt;4D3F25DD.2090006<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Blackhole.NebulaX.com>,<br />
>  Beam Me Up Scotty
<then -Destroy-Everything<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Blackhole.NebulaX.com>
>  wrote:<br />
><br />
>> On 1/25/2011 2:19 PM, <acronym title="Jerry Okamura"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> J&*$?%a</span></acronym> wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>> &#8220;ray&#8221;  wrote in message news:ihlaet01r4a<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>news6.newsguy.com&#8230;<br />
>>><br />
>>> In article <v8j %o.51224$T87.18568<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>newsfe01.iad>,<br />
>>> &#8220;<acronym title="Jerry Okamura"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> J&*$?%a</span></acronym>&#8221; <okamuraj005 @hawaii.rr.com> wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>> &#8220;ray&#8221;  wrote in message news:ihijoe05ak<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>news6.newsguy.com&#8230;<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> In article <zh3 %o.1287$rC5.936<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>newsfe03.iad>,<br />
>>>> &#8220;<acronym title="Jerry Okamura"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> J&*$?%a</span></acronym>&#8221; <okamuraj005 @hawaii.rr.com> wrote:<br />
>>>><br />
>>>>>> There is nothing in health care reform that forces people into<br />
>>>>>> government programs they don&#8217;t want.  Everyone is still free to<br />
>>>>>> purchase their own private insurance.  What is legislated is setting<br />
>>>>>> up government subsidized systems in which people who cannot afford<br />
>>>>>> insurance or medical care can get it.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> You are not &#8220;free&#8221; to purchase health insurance, you are forced to<br />
>>>>> purchase health insurance or pay a fine.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> That is part of the problem.  But no, the government can try to<br />
>>>> force > you<br />
>>>>> to<br />
>>>>> do something, but that does not mean they will succeed.  The government<br />
>>>>> tries to force people not to use drugs that they think people should<br />
>>>> not<br />
>>>>> use, and in the case of drugs, they will and do throw people in<br />
>>>> jail. > Has<br />
>>>>> that stopped people from using illegal drugs?<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> We know they will never stop narcotics usage, but the idea of keeping it<br />
>>>> illegal is so that it&#8217;s not widespread.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> But, are they succeeding and is it necessary?  If drugs were legal, would<br />
>>>> there be more people using these drugs or fewer people using these drugs?<br />
>>>> What is the experience of those countries where they do not try to stop<br />
>>>> people from using these drugs?  And what about the consequences, of<br />
>>>> such a<br />
>>>> war?  Is the benefit worth the cost?  How many people do we put in prison<br />
>>>> for breaking these laws?  Who are these people, the rich or the poor?<br />
>>><br />
>>> Fair enough:  Let&#8217;s say that since our murder rate in this country is so<br />
>>> high, we try to resolve the problem by making murder legal.  Would that<br />
>>> increase the amount of murders or lower it?  How about rape?  How about<br />
>>> auto theft?<br />
>>><br />
>>> Murder is illegal because it is taking a life of someone else.  Rape is<br />
>>> illegal, because it is hurting the person who is raped.  Who gets hurt<br />
>>> when someone uses drugs, other than the person who is using the drug?<br />
>>> Now, you may argue that people do hurt someone else because of their<br />
>>> needs, but isn&#8217;t the major reason for that, because it is illegal?<br />
>><br />
>>><br />
>>> Rape, murder, child molestation and theft has been illegal as long as<br />
>>> I&#8217;ve been alive.  Yet, it still goes on today&#8211;even more so than years<br />
>>> ago.  So does that justify giving up and allowing these crimes to be<br />
>>> legal?  After all, we will never stop these actions, and we have history<br />
>>> and records to back this up.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> One is people infringing on others rights, the next is you (via<br />
>> government) infringing on my rights.<br />
>><br />
>> I don&#8217;t go out and rape and pillage due to drugs, you have persicuted me<br />
>> unfairly.  *Pre-Crime laws*  &#8230;laws that infringe on my rights because<br />
>> &#8220;you think I might commit a crime&#8221;.  So working in a bank may cause you<br />
>> to steal money and hurt people so no one will be allowed to work in<br />
>> banks without a psych prescription.<br />
>><br />
>> You see that makes no sense either. NOT to mention it is<br />
>> unconstitutional to take my rights without a trial and due process.<br />
>><br />
>> Maybe they should only take your drug rights when you abuse drugs and<br />
>> show you can&#8217;t cope with that freedom.<br />
><br />
> I&#8217;m totally unaware that Americans have drug rights.<br />
><br />
> I&#8217;m also totally unaware that recreational use of narcotics is protected<br />
> by the Constitution.<br />
><br />
> We are a country (like most countries) that use proactive measures to<br />
> deter or prevent crime.<br />
></p>
<p>We are a country with a Constitution.</p>
<p>> If I drink four beers and drive home.  That&#8217;s fine.  If I drink ten and<br />
> get pulled over by a cop, I don&#8217;t go home.  I go to jail.  Why?  Because<br />
> of the possibility that I may hurt or kill somebody driving my car.  Did<br />
> I hurt or kill anybody?  No.<br />
></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have a seat belt on, I get a ticket for an incident/accident<br />
that never happened.  Crimes with NO victim are just government control<br />
gone wild.  Until I violate someones Rights the constitution doesn&#8217;t<br />
allow for my freedoms/Rights to be curbed.</p>
<p>> If your girlfriend or soon to be ex-wife is scared of you, she can file<br />
> for a protection order.  You can&#8217;t go X amount of feet near her be it at<br />
> her house or in public.  You may have never physically harmed your<br />
> friend in the past, but the law prohibits you from being near her just<br />
> in case.</p>
<p>You have to prove it to a judge, for it to be a legal restraining order,<br />
with evidence that the ex-wife is in danger.</p>
<p>But judges ignore the constitution.</p>
<p>> One of the reason we have laws against narcotics is because of our<br />
> social safety nets.  So even if a person hooked on drugs doesn&#8217;t hurt<br />
> you physically, nor is a threat to your family or home, you will still<br />
> have to support them via tax dollars.  And trust me, I&#8217;ve known enough<br />
> of them to say that once you&#8217;re hooked on that junk, you can&#8217;t work&#8230;.<br />
> at least for any long period of time.</p>
<p>I understand that drug addicts are a problem, that still does NOT make<br />
my rights invalid or less constitutional.   I would NOT want my kids<br />
around any and I choose not to hang out with drinkers and druggies but,<br />
there is that pesky Constitution.</p>
<p>They changed the constitution to ban Alcohol, WHY?</p>
<p>Because the government has no powers to tell me what I can or can&#8217;t<br />
ingest, drink or read without constitutional authority.</p>
<p>I see the amendment that allows taxing and some authority over alcohol<br />
but there is NONE for ham sandwiches, Soda Pop, trans Fats, Marijuana<br />
or the medicine I need to stay alive.</p>
<p>Where is the constitutional authority for the Federal government to ban<br />
me from drugs, be they prescription or NOT.</p>
<p>All the government has is a Supreme court that rubber stamps new powers<br />
for them and yet the Supreme Court has no Constitutional power to give<br />
the Federal government any new powers, not even by interpretation.</p>
<p>If they want to do it, then do it right or NOT at all.</p>
<p></okamuraj005></zh3></okamuraj005></v8j></then>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/01/26/ignorant-gullible-rightist-slaves-gobble-up-corporate-lies-about-canadas-health-care-9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama To Rightard Ghouls&#8230;Cut Social Security And Medicare?..Up Your Asses</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/01/25/obama-to-rightard-ghouls-cut-social-security-and-medicare-up-your-asses/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/01/25/obama-to-rightard-ghouls-cut-social-security-and-medicare-up-your-asses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=16155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/24/2011 9:31 PM, Bret Cahill wrote: >> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/24/white-house-social-security-&#8230; >> >> 1/24/11 >> >> By Arthur Delaney >> >> After months of behind-the-scenes scrimmaging, President Barack Obama >> has decided not to endorse cutting Social Security or raising the >> retirement age in his State of the Union address Tuesday night. >> >> The news, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/24/2011 9:31 PM, Bret Cahill wrote:<br />
>> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/24/white-house-social-security-..." >http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/24/white-house-social-security-&#8230;</a><br />
>><br />
>> 1/24/11<br />
>><br />
>> By Arthur Delaney<br />
>><br />
>> After months of behind-the-scenes scrimmaging, President Barack Obama<br />
>> has decided not to endorse cutting Social Security or raising the<br />
>> retirement age in his State of the Union address Tuesday night.<br />
>><br />
>> The news, first reported by The Washington Post, comes after Social<br />
>> Security advocates ramped up their defense of the program.http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/24/AR201&#8230;<br />
>><br />
>> Liberal senators heralded a rare victory Monday afternoon.<br />
>><br />
>> &#8220;I was very pleased to see in the media this afternoon Obama will not<br />
>> endorse raising the retirement age or reducing Social Security<br />
>> benefits,&#8221; Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said during a conference call<br />
>> with reporters.<br />
>><br />
>> &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;­&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.<br />
>><br />
>> &#8220;For tens of millions of American workers and senior citizens, that is<br />
>> very welcome news,&#8221; Sanders said.<br />
>><br />
>> &#8220;I applaud the president for standing up for Social Security, for his<br />
>> understand that this is a program that has worked fantastically well<br />
>> for 75 years and that he is going to defend it.&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>> Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) expressed similar sentiments on<br />
>> Monday&#8217;s conference call.<br />
>><br />
>> &#8220;Ultimately, the president demonstrating to the American people and to<br />
>> the Republicans a willingness to fight and win on issues that are core<br />
>> issues for him will help him in the negotiating process by<br />
>> strengthening his hand and strengthening the resolve of people who are<br />
>> working with him,&#8221; Whitehouse said.<br />
>><br />
>> &#8220;I think we both look forward to a bipartisan process going forward in<br />
>> the next two years, but we also look forward to the president showing<br />
>> strong leadership on critical issues and being willing to stand and<br />
>> fight on points where he feels that&#8217;s in the best interest of the<br />
>> nation.&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>> Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), who will deliver the GOP&#8217;s response to the<br />
>> State of the Union address, is the author of a fiscal &#8220;road map&#8221; that<br />
>> includes partial privatization of the program along with<br />
>> &#8220;modernization&#8221; of the retirement age.<br />
>><br />
>> The Social Security Act&#8217;s old-age insurance program is largely<br />
>> responsible for reducing elderly poverty over the past several decades<br />
>> to the lowest rate of any age group (though that figure may actually<br />
>> be higher, according to alternate measurements).<br />
>><br />
>> &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;­&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..<br />
>><br />
>> Economists have estimated that each 10-percent cut in benefits would<br />
>> raise elderly poverty by 7.2 percent.<br />
>><br />
>> Social Security&#8217;s actuaries say the program can pay full benefits<br />
>> until at least 2037, at which point income from payroll taxes would be<br />
>> sufficient to pay nearly four-fifths of benefits through 2084.<br />
>><br />
>> ___________________________________________________<br />
>><br />
>> So Up Your <acronym title="Asses"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> A&*$?%s</span></acronym>, Rightards!<br />
><br />
> Rightards want to cut &#8216;n gut SS but they cannot.<br />
><br />
><br />
> Bret Cahill<br />
><br />
That&#8217;s why the Nation will go bankrupt in the end&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/01/25/obama-to-rightard-ghouls-cut-social-security-and-medicare-up-your-asses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republican Arizona Is No. 2 In Poverty And A Gun Infested, Crime Ridden Shit Hole Full Of Right Wing White Trash &#8211; Is This The Future Of America Under The Republican Fascists?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/01/23/republican-arizona-is-no-2-in-poverty-and-a-gun-infested-crime-ridden-shit-hole-full-of-right-wing-white-trash-is-this-the-future-of-america-under-the-republican-fascists/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/01/23/republican-arizona-is-no-2-in-poverty-and-a-gun-infested-crime-ridden-shit-hole-full-of-right-wing-white-trash-is-this-the-future-of-america-under-the-republican-fascists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 01:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[owned]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=16095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/23/2011 7:20 PM, J&#038;*$?%a wrote: > http://www.frp.no/The+Norwegian+energy+sector+needs+clarity.d25-TwZrG0Q.ips > > by the way, not 100% of Norway&#8217;s energy industry is controlled by the > government. > > &#8220;Ranger&#8221; wrote in message > news:f60c6157-fec9-41c7-9ad6-96f9a508d45c @&#038;*$?%j7g2000vbb.googlegroups.com&#8230; > > On Jan 22, 9:12 pm, Ranger wrote: >> On Jan 22, 9:09 pm, Ranger wrote: >> >> >> >> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/23/2011 7:20 PM, <acronym title="Jerry Okamura"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> J&*$?%a</span></acronym> wrote:<br />
> <a href="http://www.frp.no/The+Norwegian+energy+sector+needs+clarity.d25-TwZrG0Q.ips" >http://www.frp.no/The+Norwegian+energy+sector+needs+clarity.d25-TwZrG0Q.ips</a><br />
><br />
> by the way, not 100% of Norway&#8217;s energy industry is controlled by the<br />
> government.<br />
><br />
> &#8220;Ranger&#8221;  wrote in message<br />
> news:f60c6157-fec9-41c7-9ad6-96f9a508d45c<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>j7g2000vbb.googlegroups.com&#8230;<br />
><br />
> On Jan 22, 9:12 pm, Ranger <andrewrange ...@gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>> On Jan 22, 9:09 pm, Ranger </andrewrange><andrewrange ...@gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> > On Jan 22, 8:31 pm, Nickname unavailable <vide ...@tcq.net> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>> > > On Jan 22, 9:55 am, Republicans Hate America <clayno ...@rogers.com><br />
>> > > wrote:<br />
>><br />
>> > > In Norway Start-ups Say Ja to Socialism:Norway has more entrepreneurs<br />
>> > > per capita than the United States:there is no statistical evidence to<br />
>> > > prove that low taxes result in economic prosperity:)low tax rat holes<br />
>> > > like texas/estonia are floundering in debt and unemployment<br />
>><br />
>> > Norway enjoys one of the top 3 health care systems in the world, but<br />
>> > still requires a minimum (income tested) payment for health care to<br />
>> > keep people from abusing the system.   It maxes out at $1500 a year<br />
>> > for even the richest.    My friend is a physician outside of Oslo and<br />
>> > makes far less than his colleagues in Canada or the US, taxes are<br />
>> > higher but there are few who complain about the &#8220;cradle to grave&#8221;<br />
>> > social safety net there.<br />
>><br />
>> > However, Norway rates 6th overall in the world for GDP per capita,<br />
>> > while the USA rates 11th.<br />
>><br />
>> > The US rates well down from Norway in health care and everyone is<br />
>> > covered.<br />
>><br />
>> > Norway also has vast natural gas wealth but exports most of it because<br />
>> > they have a wealth of geothermal energy.   And unlike the USA or<br />
>> > Canada, one a net importer the other a net exporter of energy, the<br />
>> > resources are owned by the tax payer and treated better for the<br />
>> > benefit of the Norwegians than in Canada, where royalties are paid to<br />
>> > multinationals.    A great part of Norway&#8217;s robust economy is because<br />
>> > they look out for the people, and they&#8217;re the taxpayers.<br />
>><br />
>> Sorry for the repeat post.  It appears that it didn&#8217;t go to the<br />
>> original groups.<br />
>><br />
>> On Jan 22, 8:31 pm, Nickname unavailable <vide ...@tcq.net> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>> > On Jan 22, 9:55 am, Republicans Hate America <clayno ...@rogers.com><br />
>> > wrote:<br />
>> > In Norway Start-ups Say Ja to Socialism:Norway has more entrepreneurs<br />
>> > per capita than the United States:there is no statistical evidence to<br />
>> > prove that low taxes result in economic prosperity:)low tax rat holes<br />
>> > like texas/estonia are floundering in debt and unemployment<br />
>><br />
>> Norway enjoys one of the top 3 health care systems in the world, but<br />
>> still requires a minimum (income tested) payment for health care to<br />
>> keep people from abusing the system.   It maxes out at $1500 a year<br />
>> for even the richest.    My friend is a physician outside of Oslo and<br />
>> makes far less than his colleagues in Canada or the US, taxes are<br />
>> higher but there are few who complain about the &#8220;cradle to grave&#8221;<br />
>> social safety net there.<br />
>><br />
>> However, Norway rates 6th overall in the world for GDP per capita,<br />
>> while the USA rates 11th.<br />
>><br />
>> The US rates well down from Norway in health care and everyone is<br />
>> covered.<br />
>><br />
>> Norway also has vast natural gas wealth but exports most of it because<br />
>> they have a wealth of geothermal energy.   And unlike the USA or<br />
>> Canada, one a net importer the other a net exporter of energy, the<br />
>> resources are owned by the tax payer and treated better for the<br />
>> benefit of the Norwegians than in Canada, where royalties are paid to<br />
>> multinationals.    A great part of Norway&#8217;s robust economy is because<br />
>> they look out for the people, and they&#8217;re the taxpayers.<br />
><br />
> What is also a bit wacky is how Norway&#8217;s national energy corporation<br />
> has invested heavily in the Canada oil sands project.</p>
<p>So you have Bureaucrats investing the peoples money and future in<br />
venture capitalism, that&#8217;s not just Socialist it&#8217;s insanity.</p>
<p>Government is hardly capable of making laws to protect its citizens<br />
rights, they always end up stealing the rights.  But to think they are<br />
NOW business savvy is plumb stupid.  They can&#8217;t invest any better than<br />
they protected your individual rights.</p>
<p>A shrewd<br />
> capitalist move.   And the profits don&#8217;t go to Gulf Oil or Exxon, they<br />
> go to the people of Norway.</p>
<p></clayno></vide></clayno></vide></andrewrange></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/01/23/republican-arizona-is-no-2-in-poverty-and-a-gun-infested-crime-ridden-shit-hole-full-of-right-wing-white-trash-is-this-the-future-of-america-under-the-republican-fascists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>why would I even think I could make any Liberal smart, that ship sailed a long time ago.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/01/21/why-would-i-even-think-i-could-make-any-liberal-smart-that-ship-sailed-a-long-time-ago/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/01/21/why-would-i-even-think-i-could-make-any-liberal-smart-that-ship-sailed-a-long-time-ago/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 16:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=16005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/20/2011 9:03 PM, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: >>> >> Your strawman it is just another distraction from this thread/topic. >>> >> >>> >> Stay focused. >>> >> >>>> >>> Seat Belt laws and smoking laws and Global Warming, gun laws&#8230; in >>>> >>> all Liberal LOGIC they leave out reality and create child like fairy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/20/2011 9:03 PM, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:<br />
>>> >> Your strawman it is just another distraction from this thread/topic.<br />
>>> >><br />
>>> >> Stay focused.<br />
>>> >><br />
>>>> >>> Seat Belt laws and smoking laws and Global Warming, gun laws&#8230;  in<br />
>>>> >>> all Liberal LOGIC they leave out reality and create child like fairy<br />
>>>> >>> tales as reasons for Government intrusion into our lives.<br />
>>>> >>><br />
>>>> >>><br />
>>>> >>> Once upon a time&#8230;.<br />
>>>> >>> There lived a Boogy man in Arizona who wan&#8217;t people to shoot each<br />
>>>> >>> other, and we know that because he lets people have guns. One day<br />
>>>> >>> these guns leaped from their drawers and safes and started killing<br />
>>>> >>> people&#8230;.<br />
>>> >><br />
>>> >> Do you realize just how idiotic that useless rant appears?  You are not<br />
>>> >> going to convince anyone with rambling bullshit, building strawmen and<br />
>>> >> attacks.<br />
>>> >><br />
>>> >> Focus.<br />
>>> >><br />
>>> >></p>
<p>>> > You can use a screw driver to put each screw in with painstaking<br />
>> > patience.   Or use a screw gun and move on to the next project.</p>
<p>> However you have a screw loose if you think that bullshit will change<br />
> anyone&#8217;s opinion.  Or are you just farting for your own pleasure?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not committed to changing anyone&#8217;s mind except my own&#8230;.   I search<br />
for the truth and I follow it.   If I&#8217;m wrong then I modify my own view,<br />
why would I even think I could make any Liberal smart, that ship sailed<br />
a long time ago.  Liberal-Progressives are what they are, what I hope<br />
for is that there are others doing the same thing I&#8217;m doing and they<br />
can&#8217;t be Liberals if they follow the path to find truth.</p>
<p>Liberalism is all about lying to themselves.  Jim Jones the communist<br />
and CULTIST that took all those people to Guyana and convinced them with<br />
lies to drink Kool-Ade and shoot a Congressman was a microcosm of all<br />
these Leftists.</p>
<p>[...quote...[James Warren "Jim" Jones (May 13, 1931 – November 18, 1978)<br />
was the founder and leader of the Peoples Temple, which is best known<br />
for the November 18, 1978 suicide of more than 900 Temple members in<br />
Jonestown, Guyana along with the killings of five other people at a<br />
nearby airstrip.</p>
<p>In 1951, Jones became a member of the Communist Party USA, and began<br />
attending meetings and rallies in Indianapolis.[12] He became flustered<br />
with harassment he received during the McCarthy Hearings,[12]<br />
particularly regarding an event he attended with his mother focusing on<br />
Paul Robeson, after which she was harassed by the FBI in front of her<br />
co-workers for attending.[13] He also became frustrated with what he<br />
perceived to be ostracism of open communists in the United States,<br />
especially during the trial of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg.[14] This<br />
frustration, among other things, provoked a seminal moment for Jones in<br />
which he asked himself &#8220;how can I demonstrate my Marxism? The thought<br />
was, infiltrate the church&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8230;..After Jones&#8217; return to Indiana from Brazil, in 1965, Jones claimed<br />
that the world would be engulfed in a nuclear war on July 15, 1967, that<br />
would then create a new socialist Eden on earth, and that the Temple<br />
must move to Northern California for safety.[12][36] Accordingly, the<br />
Temple began moving to Redwood Valley, California, near Ukiah.[12]</p>
<p>While Jones always spoke of the social gospel&#8217;s virtues, before the late<br />
1960s Jones chose to conceal that his gospel was actually communism.[12]<br />
By the late 1960s, Jones began at least partially openly revealing in<br />
Temple sermons his &#8220;Apostolic Socialism&#8221; concept.[12] Specifically,<br />
&#8220;those who remained drugged with the opiate of religion had to be<br />
brought to enlightenment — socialism.&#8221;[37] Jones often mixed those<br />
concepts, such as preaching that &#8220;If you&#8217;re born in capitalist America,<br />
racist America, fascist America, then you&#8217;re born in sin. But if you&#8217;re<br />
born in socialism, you&#8217;re not born in sin.&#8221;[38]<br />
&#8230;end quote..]</p>
<p>The question is *do you recognize the common thread* of creating a<br />
crisis &#8220;Never let a good crisis go to waste&#8221; and then the separation of<br />
people from their family and friends &#8220;Welfare and Family Services&#8221; and<br />
from their own values &#8220;Propaganda and disdain for the parents and<br />
apologize and rewrite the history&#8221; and then new lies that convince them<br />
that even drinking the Kool-Ade was a rational herd mentality,  IT IS<br />
LIBERALISM-PROGRESSIVISM SOCIALISM COMMUNISM&#8230;. It is why we say these<br />
Leftists here are drinking the Kool-Ade.</p>
<p>Limit free speech and then spew lies, then crush the family and force<br />
people to rely on the cult/leader for all their needs and information,<br />
Liberals have all but accomplished this with things like ObamaCare and<br />
Government coerced Mortgages to everyone.  Most Liberals aren&#8217;t living<br />
in reality and they are the Kool-Ade drinkers.  The Liberals need to<br />
find their way back to reality and some will, good luck to them.</p>
<p>That was slow and tedious and painful&#8230;.  but I did it for the likes of<br />
you.  I hope you appreciate the effort. I may seem a bit A.D.D. to you,<br />
but &#8220;quick cuts&#8221; may be less painful and more humane than the tedious,<br />
boring, drawn-out process of sipping a bit of poison each day for<br />
months&#8230;. And what if you get hit by a bus before you drop dead from<br />
the poison?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/01/21/why-would-i-even-think-i-could-make-any-liberal-smart-that-ship-sailed-a-long-time-ago/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sound&#8217;s Like A TeaFaggot To Me</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/01/09/sounds-like-a-teafaggot-to-me/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/01/09/sounds-like-a-teafaggot-to-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 17:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=15582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/9/2011 10:32 AM, J wrote: > Hitler was anti Abortion, anti-social health care and pro-gun. Trolling? Hitler killed anyone including babies and he created gun bans. Hitler was into eugenics. Hitler hated mongrels. http://www.ushmm.org/museum/exhibit/online/deadlymedicine/overview/ His health care plan was to exterminate those he didn&#8217;t want sucking up his National health care. > > He [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/9/2011 10:32 AM, J wrote:<br />
> Hitler was anti Abortion, anti-social health care and pro-gun.</p>
<p>Trolling?</p>
<p>Hitler killed anyone including babies and he created gun bans. Hitler<br />
was into eugenics.  Hitler hated mongrels.<br />
<a href="http://www.ushmm.org/museum/exhibit/online/deadlymedicine/overview/" >http://www.ushmm.org/museum/exhibit/online/deadlymedicine/overview/</a></p>
<p>His health care plan was to exterminate those he didn&#8217;t want sucking up<br />
his National health care.</p>
<p>><br />
> He also worked closely with corporations like Bush and the Republicans.</p>
<p>Yes Hitler controlled the corporations but that is what Obama is<br />
doing&#8230;  Bush was more likely to deregulate corporation and leave them<br />
alone, but even Bush was far to pro government control of the economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/01/09/sounds-like-a-teafaggot-to-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

