<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>OutSourcedNews-Group &#187; Mexico</title>
	<atom:link href="http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/mexico/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng</link>
	<description>You don&#039;t need to regulate FREEDOM</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 18:46:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Totally wrong priorities&#8230;&#8230;.. California governor calls for higher taxes, 4-day state workweek to fill $16 billion gap</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/05/15/totally-wrong-priorities-california-governor-calls-for-higher-taxes-4-day-state-workweek-to-fill-16-billion-gap/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/05/15/totally-wrong-priorities-california-governor-calls-for-higher-taxes-4-day-state-workweek-to-fill-16-billion-gap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CARB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cut California Elected Officials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=31824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 5/14/2012 11:15 PM, Nickname unavailable wrote: > On May 14, 6:30 pm, hippy dippy dude < """""@bet sweet.bipy"> wrote: >> Cut California Elected Officials pay in half. >> Eliminate from all budgets segments to shandle Mexico&#8220;s population that >> are here Illegally. Those billions alone would straighten out the budget. >> Cut the budget [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 5/14/2012 <strong>11</strong>:15 PM, Nickname unavailable wrote:<br />
> On May 14, 6:30 pm, hippy dippy dude < """""@bet sweet.bipy"> wrote:<br />
>> <strong>Cut California Elected Officials</strong> pay in half.<br />
>> Eliminate from all budgets segments to shandle <strong>Mexico</strong>&#8220;s population that<br />
>> are here Illegally. Those billions alone would straighten out the budget.<br />
>> Cut the budget for <strong>CARB</strong> to zero and cut fuel <strong>taxes</strong> in half.<br />
>> These alone would take care of California&#8217;s budget shortfalls?<br />
>><br />
>> <a href="http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/05/14/11697542-california-gove..." >http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/05/14/11697542-california-gove&#8230;</a><br />
><br />
> the root of California&#8217;s misery lies Proposition 13, the antitax<br />
> measure that ignited the <strong>Reagan</strong> Revolution and the conservative era,<br />
> In Washington, the <strong>Reagan</strong>-Bush era is over. But in California, the<br />
> conservative legacy lives on<br />
></p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t spend too much on Socialist government, then you don&#8217;t need<br />
to over tax people do you?</p>
<p>When you don&#8217;t over tax then people and the economy can prosper can&#8217;t they.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/05/15/totally-wrong-priorities-california-governor-calls-for-higher-taxes-4-day-state-workweek-to-fill-16-billion-gap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WaPo Trying to Get Mitt Elected</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/04/29/wapo-trying-to-get-mitt-elected/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/04/29/wapo-trying-to-get-mitt-elected/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 01:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=31134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/28/2012 11:55 AM, Bret Cahill wrote: >> Re: WaPo >> >> El Guapo?? > > Don&#8217;t know what it means but that&#8217;s what the women call me in Mexico. > > > El Guapo > > It means &#8220;the tiny p&#038;*$?%r&#8221;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/28/2012 <strong>11</strong>:55 AM, Bret Cahill wrote:<br />
>> Re: WaPo<br />
>><br />
>> El Guapo??<br />
><br />
> Don&#8217;t know what it means but that&#8217;s what the women call me in <strong>Mexico</strong>.<br />
><br />
><br />
> El Guapo<br />
><br />
></p>
<p>It means &#8220;the tiny <acronym title="pecker"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> p&*$?%r</span></acronym>&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/04/29/wapo-trying-to-get-mitt-elected/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama may have lost a big bloc of votes for 2012 , both legal and illegal. US/Mexican migration reverses and &#8220;Obama Solves Illegal Immigration by Destroying the Economy &#8220;</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/04/26/obama-may-have-lost-a-big-bloc-of-votes-for-2012-both-legal-and-illegal-usmexican-migration-reverses-and-obama-solves-illegal-immigration-by-destroying-the-economy/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/04/26/obama-may-have-lost-a-big-bloc-of-votes-for-2012-both-legal-and-illegal-usmexican-migration-reverses-and-obama-solves-illegal-immigration-by-destroying-the-economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 22:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pew Hispanic Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=31078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/26/2012 6:10 AM, ???????? wrote: > On Apr 24, 10:15 am, ???????? wrote: >> Obama may have lost a big bloc of votes, both legal and illegal. Net >> migration in the US from and to Mexico has reversed for the first time >> in 40 years thanx to Obama >> >> &#8220;&#8230;the net [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/26/2012 6:<strong>10</strong> AM, ???????? wrote:<br />
> On Apr 24, <strong>10</strong>:15 am, ???????? <zuckerl ...@yahoo.com> wrote:<br />
>> Obama may have lost a big bloc of votes, both legal and illegal. Net<br />
>> migration in the <strong>US</strong> from and to <strong>Mexico</strong> has reversed for the first time<br />
>> in 40 years thanx to Obama<br />
>><br />
>> &#8220;&#8230;the net migration flow from <strong>Mexico</strong> to the <strong>United States</strong> has stopped<br />
>> —and may have reversed, according to a new analysis by the Pew<br />
>> Hispanic Center of multiple government data sets from both<br />
>> countries&#8230;.&#8221;<br />
><br />
> Obama Solves Illegal Immigration by Destroying the Economy<br />
><br />
> <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/obama-solves-illegal-immigration-destroying-economy-163400282.html" >http://news.yahoo.com/obama-solves-illegal-immigration-destroying-economy-163400282.html</a></p>
<p>Even Americans are dropping their citizenship in increasing numbers.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know that Obama &#8220;solved&#8221; the immigration problem&#8230;  but he has<br />
created a new reason to NOT want to be an American.</p>
<p></zuckerl></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/04/26/obama-may-have-lost-a-big-bloc-of-votes-for-2012-both-legal-and-illegal-usmexican-migration-reverses-and-obama-solves-illegal-immigration-by-destroying-the-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s warning to the Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/04/05/obamas-warning-to-the-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/04/05/obamas-warning-to-the-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 19:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Author Unknown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BARACK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HEAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HEAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HNIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magic Mulatto Dude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OBAMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POPULI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POSP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[READ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSJ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=30482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/5/2012 3:08 PM, Independent old cuss wrote: > On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 13:43:11 -0400, &#8220;Sid9&#8243; wrote: > >> >> Surrender @&#038;*$?%never.net> wrote in message >> news:mp9rn7l43tnjue3j3buetjurvo7trmh4i4 @&#038;*$?%4ax.com&#8230; >>> FROM WSJ >>> >>> HEAD: Ex Parte Obama >>> >>> SUB-HEAD: The president worries the Supreme Court might overturn a law >>> passed by Congress. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/5/2012 3:08 PM, Independent old cuss wrote:<br />
> On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 13:43:11 -0400, &#8220;Sid9&#8243; <sid9 @ bellsouth.net> wrote:<br />
><br />
>><br />
>> <no <a href="mailto:Surrender<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>never.net">Surrender<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>never.net> wrote in message<br />
>> news:mp9rn7l43tnjue3j3buetjurvo7trmh4i4<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>4ax.com&#8230;<br />
>>> FROM <strong>WSJ</strong><br />
>>><br />
>>> <strong>HEAD</strong>: Ex Parte Obama<br />
>>><br />
>>> SUB-<strong>HEAD</strong>: The president worries the <strong>Supreme Court</strong> might overturn a law<br />
>>> passed by Congress. The Founders were quite<br />
>>> comfortable with the idea.<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>> The following editorial appeared April 2 in the online <strong>New York</strong> Sun:<br />
>>><br />
>>> It&#8217;s been a long time since we&#8217;ve heard a presidential demarche as<br />
>>> outrageous as President Obama&#8217;s warning to the Supreme<br />
>>> Court not to overturn Obamacare. The president made the remarks at a press<br />
>>> conference with the leaders of <strong>Mexico</strong> and Canada.<br />
>>> It was an attack on the court&#8217;s standing and even its integrity in a<br />
>>> backhanded way that is typically Obamanian. For starters<br />
>>> the president expressed confidence that the Court would &#8220;not take what<br />
>>> would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of<br />
>>> overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically<br />
>>> elected Congress.&#8221;<br />
>>><br />
>>> Reuters&#8217;s account noted that conservative leaders say the law was an<br />
>>> overreach by Obama and the Congress. It characterized<br />
>>> the president as having &#8220;sought to turn that argument around, calling a<br />
>>> potential rejection by the court an overreach of its<br />
>>> own.&#8221; Quoth the president: &#8220;And I&#8217;d just remind conservative commentators<br />
>>> that, for years, what we have heard is, the biggest<br />
>>> problem on the bench was judicial activism, or a lack of judicial<br />
>>> restraint, that an unelected group of people would somehow<br />
>>> overturn a duly constituted and passed law.&#8221;<br />
>>><br />
>>> It is outrageous enough that the president&#8217;s protest was inaccurate. What<br />
>>> in the world is he talking about when he asserts<br />
>>> the law was passed by &#8220;a strong majority of a democratically elected<br />
>>> Congress&#8221;? The Patient Protection and Affordable Health<br />
>>> Care Act barely squeaked through the Congress. In the Senate it escaped a<br />
>>> filibuster by but a hair. The vote was so tight in<br />
>>> the house-219 to 212-that the leadership went through byzantine maneuvers<br />
>>> to get the measure to the president&#8217;s desk. No<br />
>>> Republicans voted for it when it came up in the House, and the drive to<br />
>>> repeal the measure began the day after Mr. Obama<br />
>>> signed the measure.<br />
>>><br />
>>> It is the aspersions the President cast on the <strong>Supreme Court</strong>, though, that<br />
>>> take the cake. We speak of the libel about the<br />
>>> court being an &#8220;unelected group of people&#8221; who might &#8220;somehow overturn a<br />
>>> duly constituted and passed law.&#8221; This libel was<br />
>>> dealt with more than two centuries ago in the newspaper column known as 78<br />
>>> Federalist and written by Alexander Hamilton. It<br />
>>> is the essay in which Hamilton, a big proponent of federal <strong>power</strong>, famously<br />
>>> described the Court as &#8220;the weakest of the three<br />
>>> departments of <strong>power</strong>.&#8221; It argued that the people could never be endangered<br />
>>> by the court-so long as the judiciary &#8220;remains<br />
>>> truly distinct from both the legislature and the Executive.&#8221;<br />
>>><br />
>>> It was precisely the separation of the courts from the other two branches,<br />
>>> Hamilton argued, that gives the court its<br />
>>> legitimacy. He asserted that &#8220;the natural feebleness of the judiciary&#8221;<br />
>>> puts it in &#8220;continual jeopardy of being overpowered,<br />
>>> awed, or influenced by its co-ordinate branches&#8221; and wrote it&#8217;s<br />
>>> &#8220;permanency in office&#8221;-meaning life tenure for judges-was &#8220;an<br />
>>> indispensable ingredient in its constitution, and, in a great measure, as<br />
>>> the citadel of the public justice and the public<br />
>>> security.&#8221; Continued he: &#8220;The complete independence of the courts of<br />
>>> justice is peculiarly essential in a limited<br />
>>> <strong>Constitution</strong>.&#8221; Then the famous sentences:<br />
>>><br />
>>> &#8220;Some perplexity respecting the rights of the courts to pronounce<br />
>>> legislative acts void, because contrary to the<br />
>>> <strong>Constitution</strong>, has arisen from an imagination that the doctrine would imply<br />
>>> a superiority of the judiciary to the legislative<br />
>>> <strong>power</strong>. It is urged that the authority which can declare the acts of<br />
>>> another void, must necessarily be superior to the one<br />
>>> whose acts may be declared void. As this doctrine is of great importance<br />
>>> inall the American constitutions, a brief discussion<br />
>>> of the ground on which it rests cannot be unacceptable. There is no<br />
>>> position which depends on clearer principles, than that<br />
>>> every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the<br />
>>> commission under which it is exercised, is void. No<br />
>>> legislative act, therefore, contrary to the <strong>Constitution</strong>, can be valid. .<br />
>>> . .<br />
>>><br />
>>> &#8220;If it be said that the legislative body are themselves the constitutional<br />
>>> judges of their own powers, and that the<br />
>>> construction they put upon them is conclusive upon the other departments,<br />
>>> it may be answered, that this cannot be the natural<br />
>>> presumption, where it is not to be collected from any particular<br />
>>> provisions in the <strong>Constitution</strong>. It is not otherwise to be<br />
>>> supposed, that the <strong>Constitution</strong> could intend to enable the representatives<br />
>>> of the people to substitute their will to that of<br />
>>> their constituents. It is far more rational to suppose, that the courts<br />
>>> were designed to be an intermediate body between the<br />
>>> people and the legislature, in order, among other things, to keep the<br />
>>> latter within the limits assigned to their authority.&#8221;<br />
>>><br />
>>> Eventually the <strong>Supreme Court</strong> itself, in the case known as Marbury v.<br />
>>> Madison, spelled out the logic of judicial review. We&#8217;ve<br />
>>> always felt it was important to note that the Court&#8217;s authority does not<br />
>>> stem from the Court&#8217;s own assertion of its own<br />
>>> powers. It is deeper down, in the writings of the Founders themselves, and<br />
>>> part of the American bedrock. It exists at the<br />
>>> <strong>Federal</strong> level and in the constitutions of the states. The idea of<br />
>>> separated powers was first put down in plain language in<br />
>>> our laws in the constitution of Massachusetts, which noted that the aim<br />
>>> was to have a government of laws rather than of men.<br />
>>><br />
>>> It is a mark of our cynical age that Mr. Obama would challenge these<br />
>>> assumptions. One can attribute the error of judgment to<br />
>>> the fear that once the Court gets its back up and decides to hold the<br />
>>> Congress to the powers that are enumerated in the<br />
>>> <strong>Constitution</strong>, it&#8217;s not just Obamacare that is in danger but the whole<br />
>>> regime of runaway <strong>power</strong> in Washington.<br />
>>> *************<br />
>>> THAT NEEDS REPEATING:  We&#8217;ve always felt it was important to note that the<br />
>>> Court&#8217;s authority does not stem from the Court&#8217;s<br />
>>> own assertion of its own powers. It is deeper down, in the writings of the<br />
>>> Founders themselves, and part of the American<br />
>>> bedrock. It exists at the <strong>Federal</strong> level and in the constitutions of the<br />
>>> states.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Hear, hear!<br />
>>> +++++++++++<br />
>>> VOX <strong>POPULI</strong> FROM THE SITE<br />
>>><br />
>>> I thank the <strong>New York</strong> Sun for telling it like it is and the <strong>WSJ</strong> for<br />
>>> reprinting it. Surely we know by now the bald faced petty<br />
>>> tyranny that Obama embodies. Surely we know by now that the worst category<br />
>>> of &#8220;lawyers&#8221; think that there is no law other than<br />
>>> <strong>power</strong>. Surely we know that those corrupted by that belief have no<br />
>>> controlling principle. How many times can this man, our<br />
>>> president, boldly say things backwards and have no one call him on it? My<br />
>>> thanks to those who shine a light in this darkness.<br />
>>> &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
>>> &#8220;[...]it&#8217;s not just Obamacare that is in danger but the whole regime of<br />
>>> runaway <strong>power</strong> in Washington.&#8221;<br />
>>><br />
>>> <strong>HEAR</strong> <strong>HEAR</strong>! (or rather <strong>READ</strong> <strong>READ</strong>!!). This is precisely the source of the<br />
>>> left&#8217;s fear.<br />
>>> &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
>>> Obama, the incredible shrinking man.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Just 3 years ago, Obama was pronounced a &#8216;savior&#8217; and &#8216;messiah&#8217;; in fact,<br />
>>> he has turned out to be a liar, a fake, and a<br />
>>> fraud.<br />
>>><br />
>>> November 2012 to throw the bums out!<br />
>>> &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
>>> Sorry, but I&#8217;ve from the start thought him a liar, fake, and a fraud.<br />
>>> *************<br />
>>> Me, too. Here&#8217;s more proof of Braack, The <strong>Magic Mulatto Dude</strong>, <strong>HNIC</strong>, that<br />
>>> &#8220;piece of <acronym title="shit"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> s&*$?%t</span></acronym>&#8221; President&#8217;s mendacity:<br />
>>><br />
>>> FROM FOX NEWS SPECIAL REPORT:<br />
>>><br />
>>> President Obama took a dig at GOP candidate Mitt Romney Tuesday, for<br />
>>> describing the Paul Ryan budget plan as &#8220;marvelous.&#8221;<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>> PRESIDENT <strong>BARACK</strong> <strong>OBAMA</strong>: &#8230;&#8221;Marvelous, which is a word you don&#8217;t often<br />
>>> hear when it comes to describing a budget. It&#8217;s a word<br />
>>> you don&#8217;t often hear generally.&#8221;<br />
>>><br />
>>> The president was clearly amused by Romney&#8217;s use of the word, a word<br />
>>> Politico first pointed out, the president has chosen to<br />
>>> use himself several times before.<br />
>>><br />
>>> <strong>OBAMA</strong>: &#8220;It is right for us to celebrate Dr. King&#8217;s marvelous oratory&#8230;.&#8221;<br />
>>><br />
>>> <strong>OBAMA</strong>: &#8220;Indeed our marvelous surroundings today&#8230;.&#8221;<br />
>>><br />
>>> And when talking about the first lady, president Obama said &#8212; quote &#8211;<br />
>>> &#8220;she&#8217;s doing a marvelous job.&#8221;<br />
>>> *************<br />
>>> So, it is obvious Braack, The <strong>Magic Mulatto Dude</strong>, <strong>NHIC</strong>, that &#8220;piece of<br />
>>> <acronym title="shit"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> s&*$?%t</span></acronym>&#8221; President, is either being his usual<br />
>>> hypocritical  self, or is in the beginning of end stage dementia where his<br />
>>> short term memory is failing him. Either way the<br />
>>> American People lose.<br />
>>><br />
>>> &#8220;Obama don&#8217;t &#8220;take up all the oxygen in the room&#8221; anymore, it&#8217;s more like<br />
>>> he is the stink-bomb in the room. Everyone heads<br />
>>> for the exits when this guy comes around!&#8221; -<strong>Author Unknown</strong><br />
>>><br />
>>> &#8220;He&#8217;s Carter 2.0, combined with the political sleaze of Nixon.&#8221;&#8211;Author<br />
>>> Unknown, on Braaack, The <strong>Magic Mulatto Dude</strong>,<br />
>>> &#8220;Steaming Pile Of&#8230;&#8221;<br />
>>><br />
>>> &#8220;Obama? Obama is an incompetent partisan prick!&#8221;-<strong>Author Unknown</strong><br />
>>><br />
>>> &#8220;I&#8217;m not sure how anyone could say with certainty what Obama&#8217;s biggest lie<br />
>>> actually is. The man is an ACORN Democrat &#8211; his<br />
>>> entire life is a lie.&#8221; <strong>Author Unknown</strong><br />
>>><br />
>>> &#8220;We need to get rid of this silly little black man. We had our little<br />
>>> experiment with affirmative action in the presidency of<br />
>>> the US, and it failed miserably&#8221;.-<strong>Author Unknown</strong><br />
>>><br />
>>> &#8220;This piece of <acronym title="shit"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> s&*$?%t</span></acronym> president, hereinafter referred to as the <strong>POSP</strong>, has no<br />
>>> respect for you, the constitution, the free market<br />
>>> or anything else that is American as we understand what that means. The<br />
>>> <strong>POSP</strong> intends to change your way of life, no matter<br />
>>> what, and does not care what you think. He is running a shadow socialist<br />
>>> government, and should be cuffed and jailed.&#8221;-Author<br />
>>> Unknown<br />
>>><br />
>>> What&#8217;s another name for fearmongering, incompetent nincompoop? Why,<br />
>>> Braaack, The <strong>Magic Mulatto Dude</strong>, <strong>HNIC</strong>, of course. He&#8217;ll<br />
>>> soon by listed as such in dictionaries and thesauri everywhere.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Why would anyone support The <strong>Magic Mulatto Dude</strong>, <strong>HNIC</strong>, that &#8220;boy in a<br />
>>> man&#8217;s job&#8221;?<br />
>>><br />
>>> I predict &#8220;My God, what did we do&#8221; voter regret, and yearn for The Magic<br />
>>> Mulatto Dude&#8217;s bony <acronym title="ass"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> a&*$?%s</span></acronym> being kicked out in<br />
>>> 2012&#8230;if he survives.<br />
>>><br />
>>> It&#8217;s fun watching the implosion.<br />
>>><br />
>>> No Surrender!<br />
>>><br />
>>> Dionysius<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>><br />
>> .<br />
>> .<br />
>> There is nothing in the constitution giving the USSC the <strong>power</strong> to overturn<br />
>> laws passed by congress and signed by the president.<br />
>> In Marbury v Madison the court simply assumed a <strong>power</strong> that was not spelled<br />
>> out.<br />
>> It&#8217;s been accepted and it is traditional but it is not constitutional law.<br />
>><br />
>> Though the president has disowned the idea, if the Health care law is<br />
>> overturned, he can simply ignore the court&#8217;s action and proceed to implement<br />
>> the law.<br />
><br />
> Where did your law degree come from? A Cracker Jack box? Read Article<br />
> III, Section 2. The question before the <strong>Supreme Court</strong> is a case<br />
> brought by several states as a controversy to which the United States<br />
> is a party &#8220;In all other cases before mentioned, the supreme court<br />
> shall have appellate jurisdiction, BOTH AS TO LAW and fact, with such<br />
> exceptions and under such regulations as the <strong>CONGRESS</strong> <strong>SHALL</strong> MAKE.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think what he means is Obama can do what he did to the courts when the<br />
Oil Leases and permits in the Gulf were suspended by Presidential<br />
decree&#8230;.   Obama ignored the court orders and did what ever he wanted<br />
and then usually sends some veiled threats to judges and lawyers or even<br />
NOT so thinly veiled threats out to the people opposing him.</p>
<p>You know, *RULE WITH AN IRON FIST like Uncle Joe Stalin*</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what Obama does best.</p>
<p></no></sid9></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/04/05/obamas-warning-to-the-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s pig daughter dances on bar drunk at Spring Break</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/03/22/obamas-pig-daughter-dances-on-bar-drunk-at-spring-break/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/03/22/obamas-pig-daughter-dances-on-bar-drunk-at-spring-break/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 18:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls Gone Wild]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDIOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LETTERMAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QUESTION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SLUT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spring Break]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VILLAGE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=29976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 3/22/2012 1:42 PM, FringeScientistsControlObama wrote: > Who on earth lets a 13 yr old go to Mexico on spring break *THE HARVARD VILLAGE IDIOT* The question is&#8230;.. will she be in a Girls Gone Wild CD or will someone call her a S&#038;*$?%T when she gets back home and someone puts a sex tape [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 3/22/2012 1:42 PM, FringeScientistsControlObama wrote:<br />
>    Who on earth lets a 13 yr old go to <strong>Mexico</strong> on spring break</p>
<p>*THE <strong>HARVARD</strong> <strong>VILLAGE</strong> <strong>IDIOT</strong>*</p>
<p>The question is&#8230;..  will she be in a <strong>Girls Gone Wild</strong> CD or will<br />
someone call her a <strong><acronym title="SLUT"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> S&*$?%T</span></acronym></strong> when she gets back home and someone puts a sex<br />
tape of her on the internet like they did to <strong>Paris</strong> Hilton?</p>
<p>This is Why people like <strong>DAVID</strong> <strong>LETTERMAN</strong> were calling the 13 year old<br />
Palin girl <acronym title="slutty"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> s&*$?%y</span></acronym> and joking that she got Knocked up at the ball park.</p>
<p>*THE <strong>REAL</strong> <strong>QUESTION</strong> IS*<br />
Did Obama pay for the contraceptives for his daughter or did she have<br />
<strong>insurance</strong> that paid for her to have sex, that would be taxpayers that<br />
paid so don&#8217;t we get some details for having paid 100% of the freight on<br />
this one?</p>
<p>publicly funded items are not a matter of privacy&#8230;.   We know how much<br />
we pay teh President, why can&#8217;t we also know how much we pay for his<br />
medical care and that of any others we the people are footing the bills for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/03/22/obamas-pig-daughter-dances-on-bar-drunk-at-spring-break/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eric Holder Should Apologize To Mexico For &#8216;Fast And Furious &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/28/eric-holder-should-apologize-to-mexico-for-fast-and-furious-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/28/eric-holder-should-apologize-to-mexico-for-fast-and-furious-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 03:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/28/2012 7:39 PM, don Gabacho wrote: > On Jan 28, 5:28 pm, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: >> On 1/28/2012 12:46 AM, f. barnes wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Jan 27, 7:15 pm, don Gabacho wrote: >>>> Darrell Issa: Eric Holder Should Apologize To Mexico For &#8216;Fast And >>>> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/28/2012 7:39 PM, don Gabacho wrote:<br />
> On Jan 28, 5:28 pm, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>> On 1/28/2012 12:46 AM, f. barnes wrote:<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>> On Jan 27, 7:15 pm, don Gabacho <jpast ...@nettaxi.com> wrote:<br />
>>>> Darrell Issa: Eric <strong>Holder</strong> Should Apologize To <strong>Mexico</strong> For &#8216;Fast And<br />
>>>> Furious &#8230;<br />
>>>> <strong>Huffington Post</strong><br />
>>>> Some of that blood is from Mexican victims, which Issa says is grounds<br />
>>>> for<br />
>>>> <strong>Attorney General</strong> Eric <strong>Holder</strong> to apologize to families south of the<br />
>>>> border.<br />
>>>> &#8220;Yes, he should find a way to make it very clear to our neighbors to<br />
>>>> the<br />
>>>> south &#8212; at least to the &#8230;<br />
>>>> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/26/darrell-issa-eric-holder-" >http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/26/darrell-issa-eric-holder-</a><br />
>>>> fast-and-furious_n_1233938.html><br />
>><br />
>>> When has <strong>Mexico</strong> apologized to the <strong>US</strong> or to any other country, person,<br />
>>> place, or thing?<br />
>><br />
>> Eric <strong>Holder</strong> is a <strong>racist</strong> and doesn&#8217;t care about the Mexicans killed by<br />
>> his policies.<br />
><br />
> Whoa! He&#8217;s hardly alone. Hint: Obama and Mx&#8217;s President Calderon.<br />
></p>
<p>Them too&#8230;.</p>
<p>Obama is enabling and promoting Eric Holders explicit racism.</p>
<p></jpast></thendestroyeveryth>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/28/eric-holder-should-apologize-to-mexico-for-fast-and-furious-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eric Holder Should Apologize To Mexico For &#8216;Fast And Furious &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/28/eric-holder-should-apologize-to-mexico-for-fast-and-furious/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/28/eric-holder-should-apologize-to-mexico-for-fast-and-furious/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 22:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/28/2012 12:46 AM, f. barnes wrote: > On Jan 27, 7:15 pm, don Gabacho wrote: >> Darrell Issa: Eric Holder Should Apologize To Mexico For &#8216;Fast And >> Furious &#8230; >> Huffington Post >> Some of that blood is from Mexican victims, which Issa says is grounds >> for >> Attorney General Eric Holder [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/28/2012 12:46 AM, f. barnes wrote:<br />
> On Jan 27, 7:15 pm, don Gabacho <jpast ...@nettaxi.com> wrote:<br />
>> Darrell Issa: Eric <strong>Holder</strong> Should Apologize To <strong>Mexico</strong> For &#8216;Fast And<br />
>> Furious &#8230;<br />
>> <strong>Huffington Post</strong><br />
>> Some of that blood is from Mexican victims, which Issa says is grounds<br />
>> for<br />
>> <strong>Attorney General</strong> Eric <strong>Holder</strong> to apologize to families south of the<br />
>> border.<br />
>> &#8220;Yes, he should find a way to make it very clear to our neighbors to<br />
>> the<br />
>> south &#8212; at least to the &#8230;<br />
>> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/26/darrell-issa-eric-holder-" >http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/26/darrell-issa-eric-holder-</a><br />
>> fast-and-furious_n_1233938.html><br />
><br />
> When has <strong>Mexico</strong> apologized to the <strong>US</strong> or to any other country, person,<br />
> place, or thing?</p>
<p>Eric <strong>Holder</strong> is a <strong>racist</strong> and doesn&#8217;t care about the Mexicans killed by<br />
his policies.</p>
<p></jpast></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/28/eric-holder-should-apologize-to-mexico-for-fast-and-furious/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;The oil will get here regardless of the rout and shipping method, Obama wastes millions of gallons of diesel fuel, and didn&#8217;t care one little bit.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/23/the-oil-will-get-here-regardless-of-the-rout-and-shipping-method-obama-wastes-millions-of-gallons-of-diesel-fuel-and-didnt-care-one-little-bit/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/23/the-oil-will-get-here-regardless-of-the-rout-and-shipping-method-obama-wastes-millions-of-gallons-of-diesel-fuel-and-didnt-care-one-little-bit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska Washington State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HYPOCRITE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INFLATE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OBAMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Mon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PRICE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William Sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TIRES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/23/2012 1:56 PM, CB @&#038;*$?%PrayForMe.com wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:10:18 -0800 (PST), plainolamerican > wrote: > >> On Jan 23, 9:03 am, &#8220;C&#8230;@PrayForMe.com&#8221; wrote: >>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:30:00 -0700, Hisler wrote: >>>> On 1/20/2012 6:10 PM, 2849 Dead wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:13:16 -0700, Hisler [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>23</strong>/2012 1:56 PM, <a href="mailto:CB<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>PrayForMe.com">CB<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>PrayForMe.com</a> wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Mon</strong>, <strong>23</strong> Jan 2012 07:<strong>10</strong>:18 -0800 (PST), plainolamerican<br />
>
<plainolamerican @gmail.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> On Jan <strong>23</strong>, 9:03 am, &#8220;C&#8230;@PrayForMe.com&#8221; <c ...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:<br />
>>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:30:00 -0700, Hisler <his ...@<acronym title="cocks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%s</span></acronym>.net> wrote:<br />
>>>> On 1/20/2012 6:<strong>10</strong> PM, 2849 Dead wrote:<br />
>>>>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:13:16 -0700, Hisler wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> On 1/20/2012 2:53 PM, plainolamerican wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> On Jan 20, 3:20 pm, &#8220;Ramon F. CabanaBoy&#8221;
<pissingoffthel ...@yahoo.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>> Attn RATs: You&#8217;re Fukked!<br />
>>>>>>>> Unions Representing Blue-Collar Working Americans Rip Obozo A New<br />
>>>>>>>> <acronym title="Asshole"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> A&*$?%e</span></acronym> Over The <strong>Keystone Pipeline</strong><br />
>>>>>>>> The president of the half-million member Laborers&#8217; International Union<br />
>>>>>>>> of North America has categorized the Obama Administration&#8217;s January 18<br />
>>>>>>>> rejection of the construction of the 1,700-mile Keystone XL pipeline<br />
>>>>>>>> as &#8220;politics at its worst,&#8221; indicating a potential hit to the Obama<br />
>>>>>>>> re- election campaign from his union base. Here are the<br />
>>>>>>>> details…http://news.yahoo.com/union-pipeline-decision-politics-<br />
>>>>> worst-00430271&#8230;<br />
>>>>>>>> &#8212;&#8211;<br />
>>>>>>>> Whoops!<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>> O&#8217;s worst mistake yet<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> Since when did oil companies need the approval of the President to build<br />
>>>>>> pipelines?<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> They don&#8217;t.  They need the approval of the State Department, and<br />
>>>>> Department of the Interior.  When they cross state or international<br />
>>>>> borders.<br />
>>><br />
>>>> Then the pipeline will go to <strong>British Columbia</strong> and the oil will ship to<br />
>>>> <strong>China</strong>.  I&#8217;m not sure where it would have been shipped to from the Gulf<br />
>>>> of <strong>Mexico</strong>.  It doesn&#8217;t sound like the oil would benefit American consumers.</p>
<p>If oil was forced to be piped to the ocean it can pollute<br />
Alaska/Washington State like the spill at <strong>Prince William Sound</strong>.   When<br />
loaded into a tanker ship. Remember they sink and spill.</p>
<p>The stupidity of the <strong>ECO</strong>-Socialists is incredible.</p>
<p>If they wanted to stop a spill the first thing is to get control of the<br />
project NOT chase them away to do it without critical expertise and<br />
oversight.</p>
<p>Then you make sure the project is environmentally safe and it would also<br />
have been a National security win/win.</p>
<p>The only problems so far are, Obama isn&#8217;t getting a cut of the money for<br />
his re-election and his pals in the unions and <strong>ACORN</strong> and others.  And<br />
Obama&#8217;s big problem is that it cuts out the planned redistribution of<br />
<strong>wealth</strong> that has been planned for moving <strong>wealth</strong> from America to the rest<br />
of the world.</p>
<p>Interesting also is that the oil can then be shipped from <strong>BC</strong> the same as<br />
oil is shipped from Valdez Alaska to American ports and the question<br />
becomes, what will that do to the <strong>PRICE</strong> of oil and all that transporting<br />
will also increase the odds of an oil spill&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>So the oil will get to America regardless and we will still have the oil<br />
spill problem, the oil will get here regardless of the rout and shipping<br />
method, the *<strong>ECO</strong>-<strong>SOCIALISTS</strong>* are just plain stupid.</p>
<p>The wasted Diesel will be in the millions if NOT a billion gallons, so<br />
Obama with the stroke of a pen will chose to be wasteful and cause<br />
incredible inefficiency and waste while the <strong>EPA</strong> sits on the side line<br />
and allows Obama to create gas mileage *real gas Mileage* to be crushed<br />
while he tells you to <strong>INFLATE</strong> YOUR <strong>TIRES</strong> to get more gas mileage in your<br />
car.</p>
<p>Obama passes regulations that force you to buy cars that get better gas<br />
mileage and at the same time Obama is going to force the oil producers<br />
to use more fuel to get their oil to the refineries. And all it took was<br />
the stroke of a pen.</p>
<p>*What a <acronym title="FUCKING"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> F&*$?%G</span></acronym> <strong>HYPOCRITE</strong> <strong>OBAMA</strong> IS*</p>
</pissingoffthel></his></c></plainolamerican>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/23/the-oil-will-get-here-regardless-of-the-rout-and-shipping-method-obama-wastes-millions-of-gallons-of-diesel-fuel-and-didnt-care-one-little-bit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keystone Pipeline!&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;the oil will get here regardless of the rout and shipping method, the *ECO-SOCIALISTS* are just plain stupid.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/23/keystone-pipelinethe-oil-will-get-here-regardless-of-the-rout-and-shipping-method-the-eco-socialists-are-just-plain-stupid/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/23/keystone-pipelinethe-oil-will-get-here-regardless-of-the-rout-and-shipping-method-the-eco-socialists-are-just-plain-stupid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska Washington State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Mon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PRICE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William Sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/23/2012 1:56 PM, CB @&#038;*$?%PrayForMe.com wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:10:18 -0800 (PST), plainolamerican > wrote: > >> On Jan 23, 9:03 am, &#8220;C&#8230;@PrayForMe.com&#8221; wrote: >>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:30:00 -0700, Hisler wrote: >>>> On 1/20/2012 6:10 PM, 2849 Dead wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:13:16 -0700, Hisler [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>23</strong>/2012 1:56 PM, <a href="mailto:CB<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>PrayForMe.com">CB<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>PrayForMe.com</a> wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Mon</strong>, <strong>23</strong> Jan 2012 07:<strong>10</strong>:18 -0800 (<strong>PST</strong>), plainolamerican<br />
>
<plainolamerican @gmail.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> On Jan <strong>23</strong>, 9:03 am, &#8220;C&#8230;@PrayForMe.com&#8221; <c ...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:<br />
>>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:30:00 -0700, Hisler <his ...@<acronym title="cocks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%s</span></acronym>.net> wrote:<br />
>>>> On 1/20/2012 6:<strong>10</strong> PM, 2849 Dead wrote:<br />
>>>>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:13:16 -0700, Hisler wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> On 1/20/2012 2:53 PM, plainolamerican wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> On Jan 20, 3:20 pm, &#8220;Ramon F. CabanaBoy&#8221;
<pissingoffthel ...@yahoo.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>> Attn RATs: You&#8217;re Fukked!<br />
>>>>>>>> Unions Representing Blue-Collar <strong>Working</strong> Americans Rip Obozo A New<br />
>>>>>>>> <acronym title="Asshole"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> A&*$?%e</span></acronym> Over The <strong>Keystone Pipeline</strong><br />
>>>>>>>> The president of the half-million member Laborers&#8217; International <strong>Union</strong><br />
>>>>>>>> of <strong>North America</strong> has categorized the Obama Administration&#8217;s January 18<br />
>>>>>>>> rejection of the construction of the 1,700-mile Keystone XL pipeline<br />
>>>>>>>> as &#8220;politics at its worst,&#8221; indicating a potential hit to the Obama<br />
>>>>>>>> re- election campaign from his union base. Here are the<br />
>>>>>>>> details…http://news.yahoo.com/union-pipeline-decision-politics-<br />
>>>>> worst-00430271&#8230;<br />
>>>>>>>> &#8212;&#8211;<br />
>>>>>>>> Whoops!<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>> O&#8217;s worst mistake yet<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> Since when did oil companies need the approval of the President to build<br />
>>>>>> pipelines?<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> They don&#8217;t.  They need the approval of the <strong>State Department</strong>, and<br />
>>>>> Department of the Interior.  When they cross state or international<br />
>>>>> borders.<br />
>>><br />
>>>> Then the pipeline will go to <strong>British Columbia</strong> and the oil will ship to<br />
>>>> <strong>China</strong>.  I&#8217;m not sure where it would have been shipped to from the Gulf<br />
>>>> of <strong>Mexico</strong>.  It doesn&#8217;t sound like the oil would benefit American consumers.</p>
<p>If it was to go to the ocean it can pollute Alaska/Washington State like<br />
the spill at <strong>Prince William Sound</strong>.   When loaded into a tanker ship.<br />
Remember they sink and spill.</p>
<p>The stupidity of the <strong>ECO</strong>-Socialists is incredible.</p>
<p>If they wanted to stop a spill the first thing is to get control of the<br />
project NOT chase them away to do it without critical expertise and<br />
oversight.</p>
<p>Then you make sure the project is environmentally safe and it would also<br />
have been a National security win/win.</p>
<p>The only problems so far are, Obama isn&#8217;t getting a cut of the money for<br />
his re-election and his pals in the unions and ACORN and others.  And<br />
Obama&#8217;s big problem is that it cuts out the planned redistribution of<br />
<strong>wealth</strong> that has been planned for moving <strong>wealth</strong> from America to the rest<br />
of the world.</p>
<p>Interesting also is that the oil can then be shipped from <strong>BC</strong> the same as<br />
oil is shipped from Valdez Alaska to American ports and the question<br />
becomes, what will that do to the <strong>PRICE</strong> of oil and all that transporting<br />
will also increase the odds of an oil spill&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>So the oil will get to America regardless and we will still have the oil<br />
spill problem, the oil will get here regardless of the rout and shipping<br />
method, the *<strong>ECO</strong>-<strong>SOCIALISTS</strong>* are just plain stupid.</p>
</pissingoffthel></his></c></plainolamerican>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/23/keystone-pipelinethe-oil-will-get-here-regardless-of-the-rout-and-shipping-method-the-eco-socialists-are-just-plain-stupid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You&#8217;re Fukked! Unions Representing Blue-Collar Working Americans Rip Obozo A New Asshole Over The Keystone Pipeline!</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/23/youre-fukked-unions-representing-blue-collar-working-americans-rip-obozo-a-new-asshole-over-the-keystone-pipeline/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/23/youre-fukked-unions-representing-blue-collar-working-americans-rip-obozo-a-new-asshole-over-the-keystone-pipeline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska Washington State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Mon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William Sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/23/2012 1:56 PM, CB @&#038;*$?%PrayForMe.com wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:10:18 -0800 (PST), plainolamerican > wrote: > >> On Jan 23, 9:03 am, &#8220;C&#8230;@PrayForMe.com&#8221; wrote: >>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:30:00 -0700, Hisler wrote: >>>> On 1/20/2012 6:10 PM, 2849 Dead wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:13:16 -0700, Hisler [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>23</strong>/2012 1:56 PM, <a href="mailto:CB<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>PrayForMe.com">CB<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>PrayForMe.com</a> wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Mon</strong>, <strong>23</strong> Jan 2012 07:<strong>10</strong>:18 -0800 (<strong>PST</strong>), plainolamerican<br />
>
<plainolamerican @gmail.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> On Jan <strong>23</strong>, 9:03 am, &#8220;C&#8230;@PrayForMe.com&#8221; <c ...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:<br />
>>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:30:00 -0700, Hisler <his ...@<acronym title="cocks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%s</span></acronym>.net> wrote:<br />
>>>> On 1/20/2012 6:<strong>10</strong> PM, 2849 Dead wrote:<br />
>>>>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:13:16 -0700, Hisler wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> On 1/20/2012 2:53 PM, plainolamerican wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> On Jan 20, 3:20 pm, &#8220;Ramon F. CabanaBoy&#8221;
<pissingoffthel ...@yahoo.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>> Attn RATs: You&#8217;re Fukked!<br />
>>>>>>>> Unions Representing Blue-Collar <strong>Working</strong> Americans Rip Obozo A New<br />
>>>>>>>> <acronym title="Asshole"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> A&*$?%e</span></acronym> Over The <strong>Keystone Pipeline</strong><br />
>>>>>>>> The president of the half-million member Laborers&#8217; International <strong>Union</strong><br />
>>>>>>>> of North America has categorized the <strong>Obama Administration</strong>&#8216;s January 18<br />
>>>>>>>> rejection of the construction of the 1,700-mile Keystone XL pipeline<br />
>>>>>>>> as &#8220;politics at its worst,&#8221; indicating a potential hit to the Obama<br />
>>>>>>>> re- election campaign from his union base. Here are the<br />
>>>>>>>> details…http://news.yahoo.com/union-pipeline-decision-politics-<br />
>>>>> worst-00430271&#8230;<br />
>>>>>>>> &#8212;&#8211;<br />
>>>>>>>> Whoops!<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>> O&#8217;s worst mistake yet<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> Since when did oil companies need the approval of the President to build<br />
>>>>>> pipelines?<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> They don&#8217;t.  They need the approval of the <strong>State Department</strong>, and<br />
>>>>> Department of the Interior.  When they cross state or international<br />
>>>>> borders.<br />
>>><br />
>>>> Then the pipeline will go to <strong>British Columbia</strong> and the oil will ship to<br />
>>>> <strong>China</strong>.  I&#8217;m not sure where it would have been shipped to from the Gulf<br />
>>>> of <strong>Mexico</strong>.  It doesn&#8217;t sound like the oil would benefit American consumers.</p>
<p>If it was to go to the ocean it can pollute Alaska/Washington State like<br />
the spill at <strong>Prince William Sound</strong>.   When loaded into a tanker ship.<br />
Remember they sink and spill.</p>
<p>The stupidity of the <strong>ECO</strong>-<strong>Socialists</strong> is incredible.</p>
<p>If they wanted to stop a spill the first thing is to get control of the<br />
project NOT chase them away to do it without critical expertise and<br />
oversight.</p>
<p>Then you make sure the project is environmentally safe and it would also<br />
have been a National security win/win.</p>
<p>The only problems so far are, Obama isn&#8217;t getting a cut of the <strong>money</strong> for<br />
his re-election and his pals in the unions and <strong>ACORN</strong> and others.  And<br />
Obama&#8217;s big problem is that it cuts out the planned redistribution of<br />
<strong>wealth</strong> that has been planned for moving <strong>wealth</strong> from America to the rest<br />
of the world.</p>
</pissingoffthel></his></c></plainolamerican>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/23/youre-fukked-unions-representing-blue-collar-working-americans-rip-obozo-a-new-asshole-over-the-keystone-pipeline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cowcaine! Colombian rebels sell cattle to fund insurgency as income from drug trafficking drops</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/17/cowcaine-colombian-rebels-sell-cattle-to-fund-insurgency-as-income-from-drug-trafficking-drops/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/17/cowcaine-colombian-rebels-sell-cattle-to-fund-insurgency-as-income-from-drug-trafficking-drops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Crachet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cowcaine Colombian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prostitutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/17/2012 2:19 PM, Bob Crachet wrote: > Mexico&#8216;s Narco gangs/rebels have been caught branching out into other > avenues of income too. > That puts another naill in the coffin of those who think legalizing > drugs would make nice School Marms out of Drug Gangsters. > The point being that they lose the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/17/2012 2:19 PM, <strong>Bob Crachet</strong> wrote:<br />
> <strong>Mexico</strong>&#8216;s Narco gangs/rebels have been caught branching out into other<br />
> avenues of income too.<br />
> That puts another naill in the coffin of those who think legalizing<br />
> drugs would make nice School Marms out of <strong>Drug</strong> Gangsters.<br />
></p>
<p>The point being that they lose the lucrative drug business and have less<br />
<strong>money</strong>&#8230;..  Prostitution should be legalized by all the states too.<br />
Because that would put a stop to human trafficking, since having legal<br />
<strong>prostitutes</strong> would run down the profit and run up competition.</p>
<p>Less <strong>money</strong> means that illegal risks are no longer worth the <strong>jail</strong> and it<br />
is better to do it legally without <strong>guns</strong> and high priced gangs.</p>
<p>><br />
> <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2087934/Cowcaine-Colombian-rebels-sell-cattle-fund-insurgency-income-drug-trafficking-drops.html" >http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2087934/Cowcaine-Colombian-rebels-sell-cattle-fund-insurgency-income-drug-trafficking-drops.html</a><br />
></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/17/cowcaine-colombian-rebels-sell-cattle-to-fund-insurgency-as-income-from-drug-trafficking-drops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>American Flag Burning In Mexico City&gt;&gt;&gt;With Eric Holder and Obama assisting illegal smuggling of guns to the DRUG LORDS&#8230;.who&#8217;s surprised?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/17/american-flag-burning-in-mexico-citywith-eric-holder-and-obama-assisting-illegal-smuggling-of-guns-to-the-drug-lords-whos-surprised-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/17/american-flag-burning-in-mexico-citywith-eric-holder-and-obama-assisting-illegal-smuggling-of-guns-to-the-drug-lords-whos-surprised-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LORDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pepe Le Jew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the poor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/16/2012 8:43 PM, Pepe Le Jew wrote: > In article &#60;4F13CF94.3080507 @&#038;*$?%blackhole.nebulax.com>, > BeamMeUpScotty wrote: > >> On 1/15/2012 4:30 AM, don Gabacho wrote: >>> On YouTube @: http://goo.gl/KfjGn >> >> >> With Eric Holder and Obama assisting illegal smuggling of guns to the >> DRUG LORDS&#8230;. can you blame the people for being [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/16/2012 8:<strong>43</strong> PM, <strong>Pepe Le Jew</strong> wrote:<br />
> In article &lt;4F13CF94.3080507<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>blackhole.nebulax.com>,<br />
>  BeamMeUpScotty
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> On 1/15/2012 4:30 AM, don Gabacho wrote:<br />
>>> On YouTube @:  <a href="http://goo.gl/KfjGn" >http://goo.gl/KfjGn</a><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> With Eric <strong>Holder</strong> and Obama assisting illegal smuggling of <strong>guns</strong> to the<br />
>> <strong>DRUG</strong> <strong>LORDS</strong>&#8230;.  can you blame the people for being ticked off at our<br />
>> <strong>FEDERAL</strong> symbol?<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> I&#8217;m NOT surprised at all.<br />
><br />
> American stoners are going to boycott Mexican dope to protest the 50,000<br />
> dead, any day now.</p>
<p>Well I have for 35 years&#8230;.   It would be nice if we could be free to<br />
grow our own just as we can brew beer at home for our selves.</p>
<p>Doctors <strong>hand</strong> out Psych drugs like candy to school kids and the rich. Do<br />
you think a little free home grown would be costing them billions when<br />
<strong>the poor</strong> can grow their own?</p>
<p>It would sure kill the Mexican importation of weed.   My guess is the<br />
politicians get <strong>money</strong> from  <strong>BIG</strong> Pharma and from the Mexican <strong>DRUG</strong> Cartels<br />
to keep the weed illegal, it&#8217;s a win win for the politicians, the war on<br />
drugs is used to suppress <strong>the poor</strong> and keep them in their place.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s as stupid as Prohibition was and as effective.</p>
</thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/17/american-flag-burning-in-mexico-citywith-eric-holder-and-obama-assisting-illegal-smuggling-of-guns-to-the-drug-lords-whos-surprised-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>American Flag Burning In Mexico City</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/16/american-flag-burning-in-mexico-city/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/16/american-flag-burning-in-mexico-city/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 07:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LORDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexican Nationals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pepe Le Jew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smugglers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vietnam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/15/2012 9:29 AM, Pepe Le Jew wrote: > In article > &#60;1c578150-2321-468b-a898-06145d55de19 @&#038;*$?%a7g2000pbo.googlegroups.com>, > &#8220;Ramon F. Herrera&#8221; wrote: > >> On Jan 15, 3:30 am, don Gabacho wrote: >>> On YouTube @: http://goo.gl/KfjGn >> >> Will somebody please inform president Bush that some Mexicanos are >> upset at his invasion of Iraq and are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/15/2012 9:29 AM, <strong>Pepe Le Jew</strong> wrote:<br />
> In article<br />
> &lt;1c578150-2321-468b-a898-06145d55de19<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>a7g2000pbo.googlegroups.com>,<br />
>  &#8220;Ramon F. Herrera&#8221; <ramon @conexus.net> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> On Jan 15, 3:30 am, don Gabacho <jfmpast ...@gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>>> On YouTube @:  <a href="http://goo.gl/KfjGn" >http://goo.gl/KfjGn</a><br />
>><br />
>> Will somebody please inform president Bush that some Mexicanos are<br />
>> upset at his invasion of <strong>Iraq</strong> and are burning an American flag?<br />
><br />
> I gave him a call, he said he really doesn&#8217;t care.<br />
><br />
> He also added that &#8220;Mexicans should worry about the invasion of their own<br />
> country by their own people&#8221;.<br />
><br />
> After all, the death toll is about to eclipse the number of Americans<br />
> killed in <strong>Vietnam</strong>, maybe it&#8217;s time to burn the Mexican flag.</p>
<p>Obama/<strong>Holder</strong> assisted the <strong>smugglers</strong> that supply the <strong>DRUG</strong> <strong>LORDS</strong>, and the<br />
<strong>DRUG</strong> <strong>LORDS</strong> did the killing.</p>
<p>Obama/<strong>Holder</strong> consider them acceptable collateral damage because the end<br />
game is to get more <strong>guns</strong> banned in more places in the <strong>United States</strong> and<br />
Mexicans in <strong>Mexico</strong> can&#8217;t vote for Obama so there is NO down side to<br />
helping the <strong>DRUG</strong> <strong>LORDS</strong> kill <strong>Mexican Nationals</strong>.</p>
<p></jfmpast></ramon></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/16/american-flag-burning-in-mexico-city/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>American Flag Burning In Mexico City&gt;&gt;&gt;With Eric Holder and Obama assisting illegal smuggling of guns to the DRUG LORDS&#8230;.who&#8217;s surprised?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/16/american-flag-burning-in-mexico-citywith-eric-holder-and-obama-assisting-illegal-smuggling-of-guns-to-the-drug-lords-whos-surprised/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/16/american-flag-burning-in-mexico-citywith-eric-holder-and-obama-assisting-illegal-smuggling-of-guns-to-the-drug-lords-whos-surprised/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 07:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/15/2012 4:30 AM, don Gabacho wrote: > On YouTube @: http://goo.gl/KfjGn With Eric Holder and Obama assisting illegal smuggling of guns to the DRUG LORDS&#8230;. can you blame the people for being ticked off at our FEDERAL symbol? I&#8217;m NOT surprised at all.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/15/2012 4:30 AM, don Gabacho wrote:<br />
> On YouTube @:  <a href="http://goo.gl/KfjGn" >http://goo.gl/KfjGn</a></p>
<p>With Eric <strong>Holder</strong> and Obama assisting illegal smuggling of <strong>guns</strong> to the<br />
DRUG LORDS&#8230;.  can you blame the people for being ticked off at our<br />
FEDERAL symbol?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m NOT surprised at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/16/american-flag-burning-in-mexico-citywith-eric-holder-and-obama-assisting-illegal-smuggling-of-guns-to-the-drug-lords-whos-surprised/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iran &#8212; hell ! Mexico is our enemy</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/13/iran-hell-mexico-is-our-enemy/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/13/iran-hell-mexico-is-our-enemy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 19:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexican American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rightarded Limbecile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/13/2012 2:13 PM, Marvin the Martian wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 13:32:21 -0500, Sid9 wrote: > >> &#8220;Rightarded Limbecile&#8221; wrote in message >> news:jepst3$ta9$1 @&#038;*$?%dont-email.me&#8230; >>> On 01/13/2012 11:32 AM, Sid9 wrote: >>>> >>>> &#8220;walt tonne&#8221; wrote in message >>>> > news:c2cffd10-55b1-49be-8f17-05cc2e8b9348 @&#038;*$?%t8g2000yqg.googlegroups.com&#8230; >>>>> On Jan 12, 6:41 pm, Gary wrote: >>>>>> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/13/2012 2:13 PM, Marvin the Martian wrote:<br />
> On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 13:32:21 -0500, Sid9 wrote:<br />
><br />
>> &#8220;<strong>Rightarded Limbecile</strong>&#8221; <rightard @gop.com> wrote in message<br />
>> news:jepst3$ta9$1<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>dont-email.me&#8230;<br />
>>> On 01/13/2012 <strong>11</strong>:32 AM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> &#8220;walt tonne&#8221; <tonnewalt487 @gmail.com> wrote in message<br />
>>>><br />
> news:c2cffd10-55b1-49be-8f17-05cc2e8b9348<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>t8g2000yqg.googlegroups.com&#8230;<br />
>>>>> On Jan 12, 6:41 pm, Gary <n ...@none.com> wrote:<br />
>>>>>> I found out the reason we need to fear &#8211;and deport Mexicans.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> In 1998, <strong>Mexico</strong> changed its constitution to restore citizenship to<br />
>>>>>> Mexican Americans who have taken an oath of loyalty to the United<br />
>>>>>> States, an oath that requires the renunciation of loyalty to any<br />
>>>>>> other country. <strong>Mexico</strong>&#8216;s goal: reknit the ties between Mexican<br />
>>>>>> Americans and their mother country and convince them to vote<br />
>>>>>> <strong>Mexico</strong>&#8216;s interests in U.S. elections. (1)<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> So when a <strong>Mexican American</strong> votes in our elections &#8212; he is voting<br />
>>>>>> the best interests of <strong>Mexico</strong>. Which is why they always support the<br />
>>>>>> illegals. I had wondered about that. Why would a law abiding citizen<br />
>>>>>> consistently support criminals ? Now I know.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> And our so-called &#8220;leaders&#8221; know this.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> This is out and out treason. And any politician who seeks out the<br />
>>>>>> Hispanic votes is a damn traitor.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> (1) The quote is from page 139 of &#8220;Suicide of a Super Power&#8221; by Pat<br />
>>>>>> Buchanan.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> <strong>Mexico</strong> does nothing to stop the flow of surplus peoples north across<br />
>>>>> our border.<br />
>>>>> Time for America to crank up real heat.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> <a href="http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/" >http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/</a> The Occidental Observer<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> <strong>Mexico</strong>? Our third largest source of imported oil?<br />
>>><br />
>>> Yabut, it&#8217;s our first largest source of Mexicans!<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>> &#8211;<br />
>>> I may be stupid but at least I a Republican.<br />
>><br />
>> Many Mexicans were here before your were.<br />
><br />
> Only if you&#8217;re confused as to the difference between &#8220;Spanish&#8221; and<br />
> &#8220;Mexican&#8221;.</p>
<p>American Natives were here before the Spanish/Mexicans</p>
<p>Bears were here before that&#8230;.</p>
<p>Birds before that&#8230;..</p>
<p>The trees want all humans to leave.</p>
<p></n></tonnewalt487></rightard></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/13/iran-hell-mexico-is-our-enemy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mexico still waiting for answers on Fast and Furious gun program</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/05/mexico-still-waiting-for-answers-on-fast-and-furious-gun-program/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/05/mexico-still-waiting-for-answers-on-fast-and-furious-gun-program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 23:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BATF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanders Kaufman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/5/2012 6:02 PM, Sanders Kaufman wrote: > wrote in message > news:fcb00272-83aa-4170-b2dd-13630a00765a @&#038;*$?%f11g2000yql.googlegroups.com&#8230; > >> Gun Rights Examiner and Sipsey Street Irregulars received information >> this evening that three of the prime Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, >> Firearms and Explosives players in the Fast and Furious gunwalking >> scandal have been relieved of duties. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/5/2012 6:02 PM, <strong>Sanders Kaufman</strong> wrote:<br />
> <burkheimer @gmail.com> wrote in message<br />
> news:fcb00272-83aa-4170-b2dd-13630a00765a<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>f11g2000yql.googlegroups.com&#8230;<br />
><br />
>> Gun Rights Examiner and Sipsey Street Irregulars  received information<br />
>> this evening that three of the prime Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,<br />
>> Firearms and Explosives players in the Fast and Furious gunwalking<br />
>> scandal have been relieved of duties.<br />
><br />
> Actually, they were just reassigned to other duties &#8211; a routine <strong>change</strong><br />
> after a job is completed.<br />
> They still work for the <strong>BATF</strong>, and their job still includes tracking the<br />
> flow of weapons from Republicans in the <strong>US</strong>, to criminal gangs here and<br />
> in <strong>Mexico</strong>.<br />
><br />
><br />
So they do nothing and get a retirement for doing it&#8230;.</p>
<p></burkheimer></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/05/mexico-still-waiting-for-answers-on-fast-and-furious-gun-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama/Holder `Fast and Furious&#8217; body count continues to grow &#8211; three Americans murdered in deadly Mexico bus attack</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/04/obamaholder-fast-and-furious-body-count-continues-to-grow-three-americans-murdered-in-deadly-mexico-bus-attack-4/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/04/obamaholder-fast-and-furious-body-count-continues-to-grow-three-americans-murdered-in-deadly-mexico-bus-attack-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 19:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAGGER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irony Satire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanders Kaufman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TEA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=26898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/3/2012 2:15 PM, RM V2.0 wrote: > &#8220;Sanders Kaufman&#8221; wrote in message > news:AY5Mq.42406$qH4.18156 @&#038;*$?%newsfe06.iad&#8230; >> &#8220;BeamMeUpScotty&#8221; wrote in >> message news:4F00C8A0.7030703 @&#038;*$?%blackhole.nebulax.com&#8230; >>> On 12/29/2011 10:16 PM, Sanders Kaufman wrote: >> >>>> Or else what &#8211; you&#8217;ll murder his wife and kids, as your fellow Tea >>>> Baggers have said they&#8217;ll do? >>> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/3/2012 2:15 PM, <strong>RM</strong> V2.0 wrote:<br />
> &#8220;<strong>Sanders Kaufman</strong>&#8221; <bucky @kaufman.net> wrote in message<br />
> news:AY5Mq.42406$qH4.18156<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>newsfe06.iad&#8230;<br />
>> &#8220;BeamMeUpScotty&#8221;
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote in<br />
>> message news:4F00C8A0.7030703<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>blackhole.nebulax.com&#8230;<br />
>>> On 12/29/2011 <strong>10</strong>:16 PM, <strong>Sanders Kaufman</strong> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>> Or else what &#8211; you&#8217;ll murder his wife and kids, as your fellow Tea<br />
>>>> Baggers have said they&#8217;ll do?<br />
>>><br />
>>> Not very nice of them to do that.   Did they have their official <strong>TEA</strong><br />
>>> <strong>BAGGER</strong> cards on them when they were arrested for threatening people?<br />
>><br />
>> No, he didn&#8217;t have  an <strong>ID</strong> card &#8211; but he did run for office as a Tea Party<br />
>> Republican.<br />
>> (Seriously &#8211; what is you Tea Baggers&#8217; obsession with <strong>ID</strong> cards?)<br />
>><br />
> You Tea Baggers like them to identify yourselves for your little tea bagging<br />
> parties. Tea Party members however are opposed to national <strong>ID</strong> cards.<br />
><br />
><br />
The Irony/Satire is discovered&#8230;.  Who says all Liberals are stupid?</p>
</thendestroyeverything></bucky></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/04/obamaholder-fast-and-furious-body-count-continues-to-grow-three-americans-murdered-in-deadly-mexico-bus-attack-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama/Holder `Fast and Furious&#8217; body count continues to grow &#8211; three Americans murdered in deadly Mexico bus attack</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/02/obamaholder-fast-and-furious-body-count-continues-to-grow-three-americans-murdered-in-deadly-mexico-bus-attack-3/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/02/obamaholder-fast-and-furious-body-count-continues-to-grow-three-americans-murdered-in-deadly-mexico-bus-attack-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 06:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAGGER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanders Kaufman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TEA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=26772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/1/2012 6:26 PM, Sanders Kaufman wrote: > &#8220;BeamMeUpScotty&#8221; wrote in > message news:4F00C8A0.7030703 @&#038;*$?%blackhole.nebulax.com&#8230; >> On 12/29/2011 10:16 PM, Sanders Kaufman wrote: > >>> Or else what &#8211; you&#8217;ll murder his wife and kids, as your fellow Tea >>> Baggers have said they&#8217;ll do? >> >> Not very nice of them to do that. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/1/2012 6:26 PM, <strong>Sanders Kaufman</strong> wrote:<br />
> &#8220;BeamMeUpScotty&#8221;
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote in<br />
> message news:4F00C8A0.7030703<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>blackhole.nebulax.com&#8230;<br />
>> On 12/29/2011 <strong>10</strong>:16 PM, <strong>Sanders Kaufman</strong> wrote:<br />
><br />
>>> Or else what &#8211; you&#8217;ll murder his wife and kids, as your fellow Tea<br />
>>> Baggers have said they&#8217;ll do?<br />
>><br />
>> Not very nice of them to do that.   Did they have their official <strong>TEA</strong><br />
>> <strong>BAGGER</strong> cards on them when they were arrested for threatening people?<br />
><br />
> No, he didn&#8217;t have  an <strong>ID</strong> card &#8211; but he did run for office as a Tea<br />
> Party Republican.<br />
> (Seriously &#8211; what is you Tea Baggers&#8217; obsession with <strong>ID</strong> cards?)<br />
></p>
<p>The same as the government that expects you to carry an <strong>ID</strong> card.</p>
<p>It lets us know where you put you.</p>
</thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/02/obamaholder-fast-and-furious-body-count-continues-to-grow-three-americans-murdered-in-deadly-mexico-bus-attack-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama/Holder `Fast and Furious&#8217; body count continues to grow &#8211; three Americans murdered in deadly Mexico bus attack</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/01/obamaholder-fast-and-furious-body-count-continues-to-grow-three-americans-murdered-in-deadly-mexico-bus-attack-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/01/obamaholder-fast-and-furious-body-count-continues-to-grow-three-americans-murdered-in-deadly-mexico-bus-attack-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 20:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAGGER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanders Kaufman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TEA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=26758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 12/29/2011 10:16 PM, Sanders Kaufman wrote: > &#8220;JohnJohnsn&#8221; wrote in message > news:0da47aea-3025-4a7d-88d9-904eef30fba5 @&#038;*$?%q8g2000yqa.googlegroups.com&#8230; >> On Dec 29, 5:42 am, &#8220;HeyBub&#8221; wrote: > >>> That&#8217;s a derivation of the Peter Principle where the individual rises >>> to a position of incompetence &#8211; and stays there. >> >> Well, just as long as he doesn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 12/29/2011 <strong>10</strong>:16 PM, <strong>Sanders Kaufman</strong> wrote:<br />
> &#8220;JohnJohnsn&#8221; <topcop1988 @yahoo.com> wrote in message<br />
> news:0da47aea-3025-4a7d-88d9-904eef30fba5<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>q8g2000yqa.googlegroups.com&#8230;<br />
>> On Dec 29, 5:42 am, &#8220;HeyBub&#8221; <hey ...@gmail,com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>>> That&#8217;s a derivation of the Peter Principle where the individual rises<br />
>>> to a position of incompetence &#8211; and stays there.<br />
>><br />
>> Well, just as long as he doesn&#8217;t &#8220;stay there&#8221; past Sunday, January<br />
>> 20th, 2013.<br />
><br />
> Or else what &#8211; you&#8217;ll murder his wife and kids, as your fellow Tea<br />
> Baggers have said they&#8217;ll do?<br />
></p>
<p>Not very nice of them to do that.   Did they have their official <strong>TEA</strong><br />
<strong>BAGGER</strong> cards on them when they were arrested for threatening people?</p>
<p></hey></topcop1988></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/01/obamaholder-fast-and-furious-body-count-continues-to-grow-three-americans-murdered-in-deadly-mexico-bus-attack-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sanctions Against Iran Are an ‘Act of War’ &lt; &lt; &lt; GO SANITY!!!</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/30/sanctions-against-iran-are-an-%e2%80%98act-of-war%e2%80%99-go-sanity/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/30/sanctions-against-iran-are-an-%e2%80%98act-of-war%e2%80%99-go-sanity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 22:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=26698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 12/30/2011 5:05 PM, Möebius Pretzel wrote: > Ron Paul: Sanctions Against Iran Are an ‘Act of War’ > > Unwilling to back down from the growing criticism that his foreign > policy would be “dangerous,” Ron Paul told voters in Iowa that western > sanctions against Iran are “acts of war” that are likely [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 12/30/2011 5:05 PM, Möebius Pretzel wrote:<br />
> <strong>Ron Paul</strong>: Sanctions Against Iran Are an ‘Act of <strong>War</strong>’<br />
><br />
> Unwilling to back down from the growing criticism that his foreign<br />
> policy would be “dangerous,” <strong>Ron Paul</strong> told voters in Iowa that western<br />
> sanctions against Iran are “acts of war” that are likely to lead to an<br />
> actual war.<br />
></p>
<p>Sanctions are an act of civil disobedience.    It is refusing to<br />
cooperate with Iran and refusal to do business with them, it is NOT the<br />
same as blockading the ports.</p>
<p>> Paul said that Iran would be justified in responding to sanctions by<br />
> blocking the Straits of Hormuz, adding that the country blocking the<br />
> strategically important strait is “so logical” since they have no other<br />
> recourse.</p>
<p>Blocking the straights would be an act of war.  If we did it ad if they<br />
do it.</p>
<p>> He then compared the situation to <strong>China</strong> blocking off the Gulf of <strong>Mexico</strong><br />
> to trade.</p>
<p>We never blockaded the straights,  we have sanctions which is NOT the<br />
same, you are mixing up apples and oranges because you hate <strong>Ron Paul</strong>.</p>
<p>Sanctions is when we refuse to do business with Iran and others that<br />
continue to do business with them.</p>
<p>> “I think the solution is to do a lot less a lot sooner, and mind our own<br />
> business, and we wouldn’t have this threat of another war,” Paul said.<br />
></p>
<p>He is partially correct.</p>
<p>> <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/12/ron-paul-sanctions-against-iran-are-an-act-of-war/" >http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/12/ron-paul-sanctions-against-iran-are-an-act-of-war/</a><br />
><br />
><br />
> &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
><br />
> Humanity is Awakening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/30/sanctions-against-iran-are-an-%e2%80%98act-of-war%e2%80%99-go-sanity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama/Holder `Fast and Furious&#8217; body count continues to grow &#8211; three Americans murdered in deadly Mexico bus attack</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/29/obamaholder-fast-and-furious-body-count-continues-to-grow-three-americans-murdered-in-deadly-mexico-bus-attack/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/29/obamaholder-fast-and-furious-body-count-continues-to-grow-three-americans-murdered-in-deadly-mexico-bus-attack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 06:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AWOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CLEBURNE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cristina Hartsell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gray Guest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonatahn Betz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karla Hartsell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maria Hartsell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Updated Sunday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WFAA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=26660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 12/28/2011 11:07 PM, Gray Guest wrote: > deep @&#038;*$?%dudu.org wrote in news:9hkmf7dhtmbjb9fm61bb49rdsg3gkuh91v @&#038;*$?%4ax.com: > >> On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 12:25:23 -0500, Frank >> wrote: >> >>> On 12/28/2011 11:54 AM, deep @&#038;*$?%dudu.org wrote: >>>> On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 08:27:44 -0800 (PST), JohnJohnsn >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Cleburne family killed in Mexico robbery [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 12/28/2011 <strong>11</strong>:07 PM, <strong>Gray Guest</strong> wrote:<br />
> <a href="mailto:deep<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>dudu.org">deep<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>dudu.org</a> wrote in news:9hkmf7dhtmbjb9fm61bb49rdsg3gkuh91v<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>4ax.com:<br />
><br />
>> On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 12:25:<strong>23</strong> -0500, Frank<br />
>> <frankperiodlogullo @comcast.net> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>> On 12/28/2011 <strong>11</strong>:54 AM, <a href="mailto:deep<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>dudu.org">deep<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>dudu.org</a> wrote:<br />
>>>> On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 08:27:44 -0800 (<strong>PST</strong>), JohnJohnsn<br />
>>>> <topcop1988 @yahoo.com>  wrote:<br />
>>>><br />
>>>>> Cleburne family killed in <strong>Mexico</strong> robbery spree .<br />
>>>>> by <strong>Jonatahn Betz</strong> | <strong>WFAA</strong><br />
>>>>> Posted on December 24, 2011 at 9:55 PM<br />
>>>>> <strong>Updated Sunday</strong>, Dec 25 at 2:29 PM<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> <strong>CLEBURNE</strong> — A Cleburne mother and two daughters have been killed in a<br />
>>>>> series of attacks on buses in northern <strong>Mexico</strong>. <strong>Maria Hartsell</strong>, 39, and<br />
>>>>> her daughters <strong>Karla Hartsell</strong>, 19, and <strong>Cristina Hartsell</strong>, 13, were<br />
>>>>> among the seven people who lost their lives.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Gee, no mention of Fast and Furious <strong>guns</strong> anywhere in any of this, so<br />
>>>> once again you have been caught lying in order to further your agenda<br />
>>>> of hatred against Obama.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Gotcha you lying <acronym title="cocksucker"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%r</span></acronym>.  Why do you people try your slanderous<br />
>>>> lies all the time?  You are too easy to catch.<br />
>>>><br />
>>><br />
>>> True or not &#8211; does not matter &#8211; according to Democrat party operating<br />
>>> principles, the claim is out there.  Turn about is fair play <img src='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
>><br />
>> Liar. Show how slandering someone is &#8220;Democrat party operating<br />
>> principles&#8221;.<br />
>><br />
><br />
> George Bush <strong>43</strong> went <strong>AWOL</strong>.<br />
> George Bush 41 killed his crew.</p>
<p>Obama killed millions of persons inside millions of uterus.</p>
<p></topcop1988></frankperiodlogullo></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/29/obamaholder-fast-and-furious-body-count-continues-to-grow-three-americans-murdered-in-deadly-mexico-bus-attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>See the racism now giga? It&#8217;s not hard it it? Condemn the racist scum now.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/24/see-the-racism-now-giga-its-not-hard-it-it-condemn-the-racist-scum-now-4/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/24/see-the-racism-now-giga-its-not-hard-it-it-condemn-the-racist-scum-now-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 21:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America First]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Third Position]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Caucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hispanic Caucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[La Raza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAACP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White American]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=26524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 12/23/2011 6:07 PM, Dutch wrote: > > > &#8220;Topaz&#8221; wrote in message > news:p2v9f7tf32h410hlauodpuif0s9455jvvd @&#038;*$?%4ax.com&#8230; >> >> By Dr. Adrian Krieg >> >> Every racial group except Whites has an organized group supporting >> their position and in almost every case vilifying all their opponents. >> In most cases, such as the Black Caucus, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 12/<strong>23</strong>/2011 6:07 PM, Dutch wrote:<br />
><br />
><br />
> &#8220;Topaz&#8221; <mars1933 @hotmail.com> wrote in message<br />
> news:p2v9f7tf32h410hlauodpuif0s9455jvvd<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>4ax.com&#8230;<br />
>><br />
>> By Dr. Adrian Krieg<br />
>><br />
>>   Every racial group except Whites has an organized group supporting<br />
>> their position and in almost every case vilifying all their opponents.<br />
>> In most cases, such as the <strong>Black Caucus</strong>, <strong>AIPAC</strong>, and <strong>Hispanic Caucus</strong> in<br />
>> our legislative branch, they attempt to enact laws favorable to their<br />
>> groups. Many are very successful to the detriment of the rest of<br />
>> society. We are not in the business of vilifying or demeaning any<br />
>> other race or ethnic group, but we insist that the laws of America<br />
>> allow us the same rights as everyone else. Whites will be a national<br />
>> minority by 2030; we are already a minority in California, Texas,<br />
>> Hawaii, and New <strong>Mexico</strong>. Therefore we unabashedly and unequivocally<br />
>> support the interests of White Americans through the political party<br />
>> provided by the <strong>American Third Position</strong>.<br />
>><br />
>>   Blacks have the <strong>NAACP</strong>, Hispanics have <strong>La Raza</strong>, Jews have <strong>AIPAC</strong>,<br />
>> <strong>SPLC</strong> and many others, A3P supports the White race. If you have<br />
>> problems with that depart, if you don&#8217;t like our positions, go away,<br />
>> we will not try to force our ideas down anyone&#8217;s throat.<br />
>><br />
>>  What we stand for is <strong>America First</strong>&#8230; We are opposed to<br />
>> institutionalized homosexuality as is the norm; we are opposed to<br />
>> pre-emptive wars, we are opposed to feminism and its sick anti-men<br />
>> concepts, we are opposed to <strong>gun</strong> control, we are opposed to a self<br />
>> serving media that purposely tries to inflict its warped ideas on<br />
>> society through propaganda. We solicit all red-blooded <strong>White American</strong><br />
>> men and women to our cause.<br />
>><br />
>>  Join us.<br />
><br />
> What have you done to distinguish yourselves from your cross-burning,<br />
> lynching history?</p>
<p>Wow you stereo typed all whites with that one&#8230;  good job of<br />
discrimination and racism.</p>
<p></mars1933></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/24/see-the-racism-now-giga-its-not-hard-it-it-condemn-the-racist-scum-now-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sorry, Deniers, Study of &#8220;True Global Warming Signal&#8221; Finds &#8220;Remarkably Steady&#8221; Rate of Manmade Warming</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/22/sorry-deniers-study-of-true-global-warming-signal-finds-remarkably-steady-rate-of-manmade-warming/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/22/sorry-deniers-study-of-true-global-warming-signal-finds-remarkably-steady-rate-of-manmade-warming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 02:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuel Burning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea Level]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Total Heat Content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=26470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 12/22/2011 8:30 PM, Sam Wormley wrote: > On 12/22/11 7:20 PM, Peter Webb wrote: >> You want to change the measurement to ocean temperature. Because global >> temperatures have plateaued since 1998, so you don&#8217;t want to use this as >> a measure of warming any more. In science, if your prediction does not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 12/22/2011 8:30 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:<br />
> On 12/22/<strong>11</strong> 7:20 PM, Peter Webb wrote:<br />
>> You want to <strong>change</strong> the measurement to ocean temperature. Because global<br />
>> temperatures have plateaued since 1998, so you don&#8217;t want to use this as<br />
>> a measure of warming any more. In science, if your prediction does not<br />
>> match experiment, your theory is wrong. In <strong>climate</strong> &#8220;science&#8221;, if your<br />
>> predictions are wrong, you <strong>change</strong> the definitions of the terms you use<br />
>> so your previous incorrect predictions suddenly become correct.<br />
>><br />
><br />
>   Take a look at this graph representation showing the warming of the<br />
>   oceans, Peter.<br />
>     <a href="http://www.skepticalscience.com/images/Total-Heat-Content.gif" >http://www.skepticalscience.com/images/Total-Heat-Content.gif</a><br />
><br />
>   You cannot deny the observables, Peter:<br />
><br />
>     o <strong>Fossil Fuel Burning</strong>, dumps 30+ GTonnes <strong>CO2</strong>/yr into the atmosphere.</p>
<p>Where does it go, it must be increasing the size/volume of the<br />
atmosphere or it is adding to the Atmospheric pressure as there is more<br />
mass/weight over our heads.  Which do you say it is?</p>
<p>>     o The concentration of <strong>CO2</strong> is increasing in the atmosphere.</p>
<p>Or the less dense or more dense atmosphere is leaving the planets<br />
atmosphere&#8230;.   which is it?</p>
<p>>     o <strong>Global</strong> temperature (land and sea) is increasing</p>
<p>Water takes longer to absorb heat and takes longer to release it, than<br />
does land and rock and soil. How many days will it take with less<br />
sunlight to cool the global temperature back to where you want it?</p>
<p>>     o Ice is decreasing</p>
<p>Where?  And why is that bad? And when was it that Ice was a static<br />
commodity?</p>
<p>>     o <strong>Sea Level</strong> is rising</p>
<p>Do you mean the surface level is rising or the actual volume in gallons<br />
of water is increasing and who measured the water and deducted all the<br />
land and rock and sediment mass from tectonic and volcanic and erosion<br />
activity creating land under the oceans that can&#8217;t be easily seen and<br />
quantified.  All that and more may be displacing or actually hiding<br />
volume growth.</p>
<p>>     o Ocean pH is decreasing</p>
<p>What is the significance of decreasing pH and why is it <strong>CO2</strong> from<br />
humanity that has done this?   Aren&#8217;t there sulfur vents on the ocean<br />
floor, have you accounted for every acid producing vent and proven there<br />
are NO new sources?  I watched a show that spoke of a cave in <strong>Mexico</strong><br />
that had white colored water from the naturally occurring acid.</p>
<p>>   The mechanism of greenhouse gasses has been understood for a long<br />
>   time, Peter. The details of the <strong>IR</strong> band absorption is understood.</p>
<p>But your attempt to apply it, is lacking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/22/sorry-deniers-study-of-true-global-warming-signal-finds-remarkably-steady-rate-of-manmade-warming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The same CBS reporter who broke `Fast and Furious&#8217; story exposes yet another U.S.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/20/the-same-cbs-reporter-who-broke-fast-and-furious-story-exposes-yet-another-u-s-7/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/20/the-same-cbs-reporter-who-broke-fast-and-furious-story-exposes-yet-another-u-s-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 16:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Capone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEPARTMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Strickland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MEETING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POINT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POLICE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanders Kaufman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STAFF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=26340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 12/20/2011 1:12 AM, Jeff Strickland wrote: > > &#8220;BeamMeUpScotty&#8221; wrote in > message news:4EEFC5D0.7090304 @&#038;*$?%blackhole.nebulax.com&#8230; >> On 12/19/2011 4:31 PM, RD (The Sandman) wrote: >>> &#8220;Jeff Strickland&#8221; wrote in >>> news:jcl7r0$jq5$1 @&#038;*$?%dont-email.me: >>> >>>> >>>> &#8220;Sanders Kaufman&#8221; < [bvckvs @&#038;*$?%gmail.com]> wrote in message >>>> news:BraHq.20244$_H.149 @&#038;*$?%newsfe16.iad&#8230; >>>>> &#8220;Jeff Strickland&#8221; wrote in message >>>>> news:jcime9$8hh$1 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 12/20/2011 1:12 AM, <strong>Jeff Strickland</strong> wrote:<br />
><br />
> &#8220;BeamMeUpScotty&#8221;
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote in<br />
> message news:4EEFC5D0.7090304<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>blackhole.nebulax.com&#8230;<br />
>> On 12/19/2011 4:31 PM, <strong>RD</strong> (The Sandman) wrote:<br />
>>> &#8220;<strong>Jeff Strickland</strong>&#8221; <crwlrjeff @yahoo.com> wrote in<br />
>>> news:jcl7r0$jq5$1<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>dont-email.me:<br />
>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> &#8220;<strong>Sanders Kaufman</strong>&#8221; < [bvckvs<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>gmail.com]> wrote in message<br />
>>>> news:BraHq.20244$_H.149<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>newsfe16.iad&#8230;<br />
>>>>> &#8220;<strong>Jeff Strickland</strong>&#8221; </crwlrjeff><crwlrjeff @yahoo.com> wrote in message<br />
>>>>> news:jcime9$8hh$1<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>dont-email.me&#8230;<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> The loss of border agents at the <strong>hand</strong> of the very government that<br />
>>>>>> employs them is a big problem.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> Regardless of how much you blame The People, we didn&#8217;t kill them.<br />
>>>>> They were killed by drug-dealing, <strong>gun</strong>-running, anti-government groups<br />
>>>>> &#8211; <strong>Mexico</strong>&#8216;s answer to the Libertarian and <strong>Tea Parties</strong>.<br />
>>>>> .<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> That position is akin to Chicago Police selling guns and ammo to Al<br />
>>>> Capone, then asserting that gang activity is responsible for bank<br />
>>>> robberies.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> <strong>STAFF</strong> <strong>MEETING</strong> AT THE <strong>POLICE</strong> <strong>DEPARTMENT</strong><br />
>>>> Let&#8217;s sell some guns to the street gang and see where they go, and we<br />
>>>> can blame the drive-by deaths on the gangs and not the government<br />
>>>> agents that sold the guns.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Does that really sound like a good policy to you?<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Technically, the gangs did the killings. I get that. But they killed<br />
>>>> with the guns that were it not for the governement&#8217;s direct actions<br />
>>>> (or direct inaction, depending on where you stand on the issue), the<br />
>>>> gangs would not have.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> Legally it&#8217;s the same as someone calling up their wife to get her to go<br />
>> to a place where he knows a contract killer is going to kill her.<br />
>><br />
>> He is participating in the crime, the government by choosing to NOT<br />
>> performing their obligation to the public and enforcing the law, has<br />
>> decided to participate in the crimes that follow and allow the crimes<br />
>> that they knew were destined to be committed. The reason the illegal<br />
>> guns were purchased illegally was for criminal activity.<br />
>><br />
>> If they allow someone to rob a bank and the bank <strong>employee</strong> gets shot, the<br />
>> people that allowed the bank to be robbed(private people or Police) are<br />
>> also guilty of the murder that they didn&#8217;t know was going to happen.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
><br />
> <strong>POINT</strong> OR ORDER here&#8230;<br />
> The guns were otherwise legal guns to purchase, if I&#8217;m following along<br />
> fully.<br />
><br />
> The people that bought the guns were not legal customers, but the guns<br />
> were legal to have, had the people that bought them been allowed to buy<br />
> them. That is, the druggies were buying guns that you and I could have<br />
> bought, they just were not supposed to be buying them because they were<br />
> non-citizens and the country they are from has <strong>gun</strong> laws that preclude<br />
> them from buying guns at home. They also bought them by the case, which<br />
> defies any sort of regulation that you and I live under.<br />
></p>
<p>Buying the guns may have been legal up to a point where they were sold<br />
to illegal aliens or transported over the U.S. border, transporting them<br />
over the border&#8230;   was NOT legal.</p>
<p>If they had evidence of illegal activity they were obliged to act on<br />
those crimes before people died.</p>
<p>Waiting until people are dead so that they can arrest them for a greater<br />
crime is NOT ethical or constitutional.</p>
<p></crwlrjeff></thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/20/the-same-cbs-reporter-who-broke-fast-and-furious-story-exposes-yet-another-u-s-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The same CBS reporter who broke `Fast and Furious&#8217; story exposes yet another U.S.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/19/the-same-cbs-reporter-who-broke-fast-and-furious-story-exposes-yet-another-u-s-6/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/19/the-same-cbs-reporter-who-broke-fast-and-furious-story-exposes-yet-another-u-s-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 23:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Capone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEPARTMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Strickland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MEETING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POLICE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanders Kaufman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STAFF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=26314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 12/19/2011 4:31 PM, RD (The Sandman) wrote: > &#8220;Jeff Strickland&#8221; wrote in > news:jcl7r0$jq5$1 @&#038;*$?%dont-email.me: > >> >> &#8220;Sanders Kaufman&#8221; < [bvckvs @&#038;*$?%gmail.com]> wrote in message >> news:BraHq.20244$_H.149 @&#038;*$?%newsfe16.iad&#8230; >>> &#8220;Jeff Strickland&#8221; wrote in message >>> news:jcime9$8hh$1 @&#038;*$?%dont-email.me&#8230; >>>> >>>> The loss of border agents at the hand of the very government that >>>> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 12/19/2011 4:31 PM, <strong>RD</strong> (The Sandman) wrote:<br />
> &#8220;<strong>Jeff Strickland</strong>&#8221; <crwlrjeff @yahoo.com> wrote in<br />
> news:jcl7r0$jq5$1<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>dont-email.me:<br />
><br />
>><br />
>> &#8220;<strong>Sanders Kaufman</strong>&#8221; < [bvckvs<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>gmail.com]> wrote in message<br />
>> news:BraHq.20244$_H.149<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>newsfe16.iad&#8230;<br />
>>> &#8220;<strong>Jeff Strickland</strong>&#8221; </crwlrjeff><crwlrjeff @yahoo.com> wrote in message<br />
>>> news:jcime9$8hh$1<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>dont-email.me&#8230;<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> The loss of border agents at the <strong>hand</strong> of the very government that<br />
>>>> employs them is a big problem.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Regardless of how much you blame The People, we didn&#8217;t kill them.<br />
>>> They were killed by drug-dealing, <strong>gun</strong>-running, anti-government groups<br />
>>> &#8211; <strong>Mexico</strong>&#8216;s answer to the Libertarian and <strong>Tea Parties</strong>.<br />
>>> .<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>><br />
>> That position is akin to Chicago Police selling guns and ammo to Al<br />
>> Capone, then asserting that gang activity is responsible for bank<br />
>> robberies.<br />
>><br />
>> <strong>STAFF</strong> <strong>MEETING</strong> AT THE <strong>POLICE</strong> <strong>DEPARTMENT</strong><br />
>> Let&#8217;s sell some guns to the street gang and see where they go, and we<br />
>> can blame the drive-by deaths on the gangs and not the government<br />
>> agents that sold the guns.<br />
>><br />
>> Does that really sound like a good policy to you?<br />
>><br />
>> Technically, the gangs did the killings. I get that. But they killed<br />
>> with the guns that were it not for the governement&#8217;s direct actions<br />
>> (or direct inaction, depending on where you stand on the issue), the<br />
>> gangs would not have.</p>
<p>Legally it&#8217;s the same as someone calling up their wife to get her to go<br />
to a place where he knows a contract killer is going to kill her.</p>
<p>He is participating in the crime, the government by choosing to NOT<br />
performing their obligation to the public and enforcing the law, has<br />
decided to participate in the crimes that follow and allow the crimes<br />
that they knew were destined to be committed. The reason the illegal<br />
guns were purchased illegally was for criminal activity.</p>
<p>If they allow someone to rob a bank and the bank <strong>employee</strong> gets shot, the<br />
people that allowed the bank to be robbed(private people or Police) are<br />
also guilty of the murder that they didn&#8217;t know was going to happen.</p>
<p></crwlrjeff></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/19/the-same-cbs-reporter-who-broke-fast-and-furious-story-exposes-yet-another-u-s-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The same CBS reporter who broke `Fast and Furious&#8217; story exposes yet another U.S.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/18/the-same-cbs-reporter-who-broke-fast-and-furious-story-exposes-yet-another-u-s-5/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/18/the-same-cbs-reporter-who-broke-fast-and-furious-story-exposes-yet-another-u-s-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 18:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FREE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Strickland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[La Raza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexican Flag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanders Kaufman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the poor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=26224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 12/18/2011 12:19 PM, RD (The Sandman) wrote: > BeamMeUpScotty wrote in > news:4EECB22F.7090905 @&#038;*$?%blackhole.nebulax.com: > >> On 12/17/2011 2:39 AM, Sanders Kaufman wrote: >>> &#8220;Jeff Strickland&#8221; wrote in message >>> news:jce525$cms$1 @&#038;*$?%dont-email.me&#8230; >>>> &#8220;Sanders Kaufman&#8221; < [bvckvs @&#038;*$?%gmail.com]> wrote in message >>> >>>>> Bzzzttt &#8211; the Republicans don&#8217;t consider the Mexicans to be our [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 12/18/2011 12:19 PM, <strong>RD</strong> (The Sandman) wrote:<br />
> BeamMeUpScotty
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote in<br />
> news:4EECB22F.7090905<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>blackhole.nebulax.com:<br />
><br />
>> On 12/17/2011 2:39 AM, <strong>Sanders Kaufman</strong> wrote:<br />
>>> &#8220;<strong>Jeff Strickland</strong>&#8221; <crwlrjeff @yahoo.com> wrote in message<br />
>>> news:jce525$cms$1<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>dont-email.me&#8230;<br />
>>>> &#8220;<strong>Sanders Kaufman</strong>&#8221; < [bvckvs<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>gmail.com]> wrote in message<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> Bzzzttt &#8211; the Republicans don&#8217;t consider the Mexicans to be our<br />
>>>>> &#8220;allies&#8221;.<br />
>>>>> As long as you refer to them that way, you&#8217;ll never get anything<br />
> more<br />
>>>>> than a tantrum out of them.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> I agree that there are some that do not consider them an ally, but as<br />
>>>> a matter of foreign policy, the Mexican government is an ally.<br />
> Whether<br />
>>>> it acts so or not.<br />
>>><br />
>>> I&#8217;m with you on that.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> Mexicans want to over run and take possession of lands that they<br />
>> consider stolen from them&#8230;..<br />
><br />
> SOME Mexicans feel that way.  The government of <strong>Mexico</strong> is, so far, not<br />
> among them.<br />
></p>
<p>Which is why we have a boarder that can be crossed, unlike South and<br />
<strong>North Korea</strong>.</p>
<p>>> They march in the <strong>USA</strong> with the <strong>Mexican Flag</strong>.   If they were supporting<br />
>> the <strong>USA</strong> they would have stars and stripes wouldn&#8217;t they.   Instead of<br />
>> Che they would display a capitalist American.<br />
><br />
> Hmmmm, do you also consider the Occupy movement to be ALL American youth?</p>
<p>I really don&#8217;t consider them&#8230;..</p>
<p>>> Since they wish to be something other than American, they should do it<br />
>> elsewhere, the <strong>USA</strong> welcomes <strong>the poor</strong> huddled masses yearning to be <strong>FREE</strong><br />
>> NOT the masses that want to take over and dictate to us.<br />
><br />
> There are no masses in the <strong>La Raza</strong> movement.  It is a shrill minority<br />
> like so many others.</p>
<p>Then they can be shipped back to their home country where they can<br />
<strong>change</strong> their own government to suit them.</p>
<p></crwlrjeff></thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/18/the-same-cbs-reporter-who-broke-fast-and-furious-story-exposes-yet-another-u-s-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The same CBS reporter who broke `Fast and Furious&#8217; story exposes yet another U.S.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/17/the-same-cbs-reporter-who-broke-fast-and-furious-story-exposes-yet-another-u-s-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/17/the-same-cbs-reporter-who-broke-fast-and-furious-story-exposes-yet-another-u-s-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 15:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BJACOBY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanders Kaufman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=26162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 12/17/2011 2:41 AM, Sanders Kaufman wrote: > &#8220;BJACOBY@teranews.com&#8221; wrote in message > news:O9wGq.25217$Dr1.17579 @&#038;*$?%newsfe08.iad&#8230; >> >> Let&#8217;s face it the guns came from American gun shops and the president >> of Mexico himself blamed Americans for supplying the guns that killed >> innocent Mexicans. Obviously only totally eliminating guns from Texas >> can solve [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 12/17/2011 2:41 AM, <strong>Sanders Kaufman</strong> wrote:<br />
> &#8220;<strong>BJACOBY</strong>@teranews.com&#8221; <benj @iwaynet.net> wrote in message<br />
> news:O9wGq.25217$Dr1.17579<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>newsfe08.iad&#8230;<br />
>><br />
>> Let&#8217;s face it the guns came from American <strong>gun</strong> shops and the president<br />
>> of <strong>Mexico</strong> himself blamed Americans for supplying the guns that killed<br />
>> innocent Mexicans. Obviously only totally eliminating guns from Texas<br />
>> can solve this problem&#8230;or that was supposed to be the argument.<br />
><br />
> Nobody, except you, has made that argument.<br />
> And you just made it up to scare yourself.</p>
<p>Obama playing both sides is duplicitous.</p>
<p>It tells a lot about Obama&#8217;s character or lack there of.</p>
<p></benj></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/17/the-same-cbs-reporter-who-broke-fast-and-furious-story-exposes-yet-another-u-s-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ATF used &#8220;Fast and Furious&#8221; to make the case for gun regulations</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/08/atf-used-fast-and-furious-to-make-the-case-for-gun-regulations/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/08/atf-used-fast-and-furious-to-make-the-case-for-gun-regulations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 20:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Thu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[So Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=25748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 12/8/2011 3:27 PM, Yoorghis @&#038;*$?%Jurgis.net wrote: > On Thu, 8 Dec 2011 12:16:57 -0500, &#8220;Scout&#8221; > wrote: > >> >> >> wrote in message >> news:7hn1e7dibju9g66d9kul6d7fg58bhgfr3a @&#038;*$?%4ax.com&#8230; >>> On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 21:54:58 -0800 (PST), JohnJohnsn >>> wrote: >>> >>>> &#8220;Fast &#038; Furious&#8221;: Obama&#8217;s Watergate(s) >>> >>> &#8220;Fast and Furious&#8221;&#8212;-A Bush initiative carried [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 12/8/2011 3:27 PM, <a href="mailto:Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net">Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Thu</strong>, 8 Dec 2011 12:16:57 -0500, &#8220;Scout&#8221;<br />
> <me4guns @verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:<br />
><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> <yoorghis @Jurgis.net> wrote in message<br />
>> news:7hn1e7dibju9g66d9kul6d7fg58bhgfr3a<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>4ax.com&#8230;<br />
>>> On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 21:54:58 -0800 (<strong>PST</strong>), JohnJohnsn<br />
>>> <topcop1988 @yahoo.com> wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>> &#8220;Fast &#038; Furious&#8221;: Obama&#8217;s Watergate(s)<br />
>>><br />
>>> &#8220;Fast and Furious&#8221;&#8212;-A Bush initiative carried on by the same people<br />
>>> who ran it under bush<br />
>>><br />
>>> Different name&#8212;same program.<br />
>><br />
>> So you have nothing better than lies ?<br />
>><br />
><br />
> What universe do you live in?<br />
><br />
> Tracking guns from the <strong>US</strong> to <strong>Mexico</strong> was a BUSH initiative.</p>
<p>Which Obama and <strong>Holder</strong> were caught doing.</p>
<p>Who pulled the trigger is NOT the end of culpability, anyone involved in<br />
the crime is guilty of the death&#8230;..     Any one planning or conspiring<br />
to commit the crime and anyone driving the get away car or hiding the<br />
crime is also guilty of the crime.</p>
<p>When someone murders, you have all their helpers that can be charged.<br />
<strong>So Obama</strong> and <strong>Holder</strong> and anyone covering up and planning this is due for<br />
a court date.</p>
<p></topcop1988></yoorghis></me4guns></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/08/atf-used-fast-and-furious-to-make-the-case-for-gun-regulations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rightards Clearly Split On China; Many Like Executions for Drug Crimes</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/05/rightards-clearly-split-on-china-many-like-executions-for-drug-crimes/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/05/rightards-clearly-split-on-china-many-like-executions-for-drug-crimes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barney Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Gov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commie Chinks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hungry Hippie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rightard Whitey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=25578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 12/5/2011 10:51 AM, Hungry Hippie wrote: > On Dec 5, 1:27 am, Rightard W&#038;*$?%y wrote: >> On Dec 4, 10:56 pm, Bret Cahill wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> Whether or not the story and pictures are credible, it&#8217;s believed that >>>>> the Commie Chinks execute people for far less crimes than working [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 12/5/2011 <strong>10</strong>:51 AM, <strong>Hungry Hippie</strong> wrote:<br />
> On Dec 5, 1:27 am, <strong>Rightard <acronym title="Whitey"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> W&*$?%y</span></acronym></strong> <eeld ...@gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>> On Dec 4, <strong>10</strong>:56 pm, Bret Cahill <bretcah ...@peoplepc.com> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>>>> Whether or not the story and pictures are credible, it&#8217;s believed that<br />
>>>>> the <strong>Commie Chinks</strong> execute people for far less crimes than working the<br />
>>>>> illicit drug business.<br />
>><br />
>>>>> When a country&#8217;s population is 1.3 billion or so, mass execution takes<br />
>>>>> on greater urgency.<br />
>><br />
>>>>> And let&#8217;s not even discuss the routine killing of newborn girls.<br />
>><br />
>>>> Believe me, Chinese communist does it very effectively.  No wonder,<br />
>>>> <strong>China</strong><br />
>>>> has far far less drug problem than <strong>US</strong>.  They do know what they do with<br />
>>>> their anti-drug law where Americans are caught up between political<br />
>>>> <strong>ideology</strong>.<br />
>><br />
>>> And the Chinese also have a higher economic growth rate.<br />
>><br />
>>> Bret Cahill<br />
><br />
> All American progressives these days seem to<br />
> love the <strong>Chinese Gov</strong>&#8216;t, with it&#8217;s free speech,<br />
> and its lack of <strong>Social Security</strong>. From the opulently<br />
> wealthy Thomas L. Friedman to the pensioners<br />
> on Usenet.<br />
><br />
>> The Chinese also execute government official and corporate leaders who<br />
>> are corrupt.<br />
><br />
> If the Chinese oligarchy were serious about getting<br />
> rid of corruption, they would all hang themselves en<br />
> masse.<br />
><br />
>> If you steal a large amount of <strong>money</strong>, you are likely to<br />
>> be executed. What an idea for <strong>Wall Street</strong>!<br />
><br />
> Or <strong>Fannie</strong> and Freddie, or <strong>Barney Frank</strong>, eh?<br />
><br />
>> If you are a drug pusher and get caught,</p>
<p>OR a <strong>GUN</strong> dealing Government Justice Department official or President of<br />
the <strong>United States</strong>?</p>
<p>Looks like our government is more corrupt than the the general public or<br />
the business community is.</p>
<p>>> execution will quickly<br />
>> follow. Often the Chinese execute large groups of prisoners en masse.<br />
>> The Army gets the honors.<br />
><br />
> With no rights for the accused, how do you even know<br />
> they get the right guy.</p>
<p>Apparently it makes little difference because they all get the idea and<br />
quit what they were doing.</p>
<p>> Anyway, in America, the Administration gives you the guns<br />
> you need if you are a drug cartel. In <strong>Mexico</strong>, drug dealer<br />
> executes you!<br />
></p>
<p></bretcah></eeld></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/05/rightards-clearly-split-on-china-many-like-executions-for-drug-crimes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama to Veto Any Attempt to Roll Back Automatic Cuts  AfterCommittee&#8217;sRefusal to Reach Debt Deal</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/24/obama-to-veto-any-attempt-to-roll-back-automatic-cuts-aftercommitteesrefusal-to-reach-debt-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/24/obama-to-veto-any-attempt-to-roll-back-automatic-cuts-aftercommitteesrefusal-to-reach-debt-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 15:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benny Fishhole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=25172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 11/24/2011 1:37 AM, Michael A. Terrell wrote: > > BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >> >> On 11/23/2011 7:56 PM, Michael A. Terrell wrote: >>> >>> Benny Fishhole wrote: >>>> >>>> Don&#8217;t confuse Jeffbama with the facts. >>> >>> >>> He&#8217;s already confused, like the rest of the armchair idiots that >>> infest this newsgroup. >>> >>> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On <strong>11</strong>/24/2011 1:<strong>37</strong> AM, Michael A. Terrell wrote:<br />
><br />
> BeamMeUpScotty wrote:<br />
>><br />
>> On <strong>11</strong>/<strong>23</strong>/2011 7:56 PM, Michael A. Terrell wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>> <strong>Benny Fishhole</strong> wrote:<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Don&#8217;t confuse Jeffbama with the facts.<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>>   He&#8217;s already confused, like the rest of the armchair idiots that<br />
>>> infest this newsgroup.<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>> No law against being an idiot, otherwise Obama and all his Democrat<br />
>> friends would already be in <strong>jail</strong>.<br />
><br />
><br />
>    We&#8217;d need a lot more jails.  Or take over <strong>Mexico</strong> and fence it in to<br />
> hold them all.<br />
><br />
><br />
Start with a fence around Washington D.C. and you&#8217;d have one big pile of<br />
idiots in one prison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/24/obama-to-veto-any-attempt-to-roll-back-automatic-cuts-aftercommitteesrefusal-to-reach-debt-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama to Veto Any Attempt to Roll Back Automatic Cuts  AfterCommittee&#8217;sRefusal to Reach Debt Deal</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/24/obama-to-veto-any-attempt-to-roll-back-automatic-cuts-aftercommitteesrefusal-to-reach-debt-deal-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/24/obama-to-veto-any-attempt-to-roll-back-automatic-cuts-aftercommitteesrefusal-to-reach-debt-deal-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 15:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benny Fishhole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=25176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 11/24/2011 1:37 AM, Michael A. Terrell wrote: > > BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >> >> On 11/23/2011 7:56 PM, Michael A. Terrell wrote: >>> >>> Benny Fishhole wrote: >>>> >>>> Don&#8217;t confuse Jeffbama with the facts. >>> >>> >>> He&#8217;s already confused, like the rest of the armchair idiots that >>> infest this newsgroup. >>> >>> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On <strong>11</strong>/24/2011 1:<strong>37</strong> AM, Michael A. Terrell wrote:<br />
><br />
> BeamMeUpScotty wrote:<br />
>><br />
>> On <strong>11</strong>/<strong>23</strong>/2011 7:56 PM, Michael A. Terrell wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>> <strong>Benny Fishhole</strong> wrote:<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Don&#8217;t confuse Jeffbama with the facts.<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>>   He&#8217;s already confused, like the rest of the armchair idiots that<br />
>>> infest this newsgroup.<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>> No law against being an idiot, otherwise Obama and all his Democrat<br />
>> friends would already be in <strong>jail</strong>.<br />
><br />
><br />
>    We&#8217;d need a lot more jails.  Or take over <strong>Mexico</strong> and fence it in to<br />
> hold them all.<br />
><br />
><br />
Start with a fence around Washington D.C. and you&#8217;d have one big pile of<br />
idiots in one prison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/24/obama-to-veto-any-attempt-to-roll-back-automatic-cuts-aftercommitteesrefusal-to-reach-debt-deal-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 Reasons America Will Be Judged as the Most Brutal Empire in History</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/15/10-reasons-america-will-be-judged-as-the-most-brutal-empire-in-history/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/15/10-reasons-america-will-be-judged-as-the-most-brutal-empire-in-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cambodia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LIBERALS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarian Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIGHTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=24819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 11/15/2011 12:40 PM, Z wrote: > On Nov 15, 5:59 am, MÃ¶ebius Pretzel >]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On <strong>11</strong>/15/2011 12:40 PM, Z wrote:<br />
> On Nov 15, 5:59 am, MÃ¶ebius Pretzel<br />
> <m öebius*Pretzel~@~Vampire_Slayers'_Anonymous.org> wrote:<br />
>> <strong>10</strong> Reasons America Will Be Judged as the Most Brutal Empire in History<br />
>><br />
>> Good and evil doesn’t have a grey zone. Killing and stealing is bad.<br />
>><br />
>> Violence is never “good” or necessary unless it is used to defend<br />
>> against killers and thieves.<br />
>><br />
>> Indeed, that is the morality behind the “just war” principle as defined<br />
>> by international laws and treaties.<br />
>><br />
>> Yet, this simple concept of right and wrong gets muddled by differing<br />
>> ideas about religion, patriotism, economics and many other divisions.<br />
>><br />
>> The “just war” rule has crumbled under the ambitions of empires<br />
>> throughout history.<br />
>><br />
>> The American-led Anglo Saxon empire is no different.<br />
>><br />
>> 0-reasons-america-will-be-judged-as-the-&#8230;</a><br />
><br />
> Death by government<br />
>  (Google eBook)<br />
><br />
> R. Rummel<br />
><br />
> This is R. J. Rummel&#8217;s fourth book in a series devoted to genocide and<br />
> government mass murder, or what he calls &#8220;democide.&#8221; He presents the<br />
> primary results in tables and figures as well as a historical sketch<br />
> of the major cases of democide, those in which 1 million or more<br />
> people were killed by a regime. In Death by Government, Rummel does<br />
> not aim to describe democide itself, but to determine its nature and<br />
> scope in order to test the theory that democracies are inherently<br />
> nonviolent. Rummel discusses genocide in <strong>China</strong>, Nazi <strong>Germany</strong>, <strong>Japan</strong>,<br />
> <strong>Cambodia</strong>, Turkey, Yugoslavia, <strong>Poland</strong>, the Soviet <strong>Union</strong>, and <strong>Pakistan</strong>.<br />
> He also writes about areas of suspected genocide: <strong>North Korea</strong>, <strong>Mexico</strong>,<br />
> and feudal Russia. His results clearly and decisively show that<br />
> democracies commit less democide than other regimes. The underlying<br />
> principle is that the less <strong>freedom</strong> people have, the greater the<br />
> <strong>violence</strong>; the more <strong>freedom</strong>, the less the <strong>violence</strong>.</p>
<p>Which is what I have said here for years, only I phrase it as&#8230;.</p>
<p><strong>Socialism</strong> steals your <strong>freedom</strong> and the less <strong>freedom</strong> you have means that<br />
it is that much easier for a dictator totalitarian type of government to<br />
steal what few <strong>RIGHTS</strong> you have.</p>
<p>So <strong>Socialism</strong> is a path to and part of genocide.</p>
<p>The more <strong>freedom</strong> you have, the less <strong>Socialism</strong> there is.  The less<br />
central planning.  Because when you central plan you have to take<br />
peoples individual <strong>RIGHTS</strong> away so that you can force them into the<br />
central plan, otherwise the central plan will fail.</p>
<p></m></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/15/10-reasons-america-will-be-judged-as-the-most-brutal-empire-in-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Original plan that could have stopped this insanity</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/10/18/the-original-plan-that-could-have-stopped-this-insanity/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/10/18/the-original-plan-that-could-have-stopped-this-insanity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 01:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GREEN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prostitutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smugglers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=23703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*HOW TO ALLOW AMERICA TO SURVIVE* And give America back to Americans Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and competition would help us get out of this depression. End the &#8220;war on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*HOW TO ALLOW AMERICA TO SURVIVE*<br />
And give America back to Americans</p>
<p>Reducing <strong>regulations</strong> is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more <strong>regulations</strong>, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
<strong>regulations</strong> are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression.</p>
<p>End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
<strong>prostitutes</strong> when there are so many legal tax paying <strong>prostitutes</strong> out there?</p>
<p><a href="http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs--crime-usage-falls" >http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs&#8211;crime-usage-falls</a></p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the <strong>USA</strong> and Original Green<br />
money outside the <strong>USA</strong>&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly sending red money home to <strong>Mexico</strong> would be useless as the <strong>RED</strong><br />
money would be useless in <strong>Mexico</strong> since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad. All electronic money leaving the <strong>USA</strong> would be debited the<br />
Sales tax when the money is sent/spent.</p>
<p>The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drug smuggling less*<br />
*profitable* as would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL<br />
“<strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ITEM</strong>” SALES <strong>TAX</strong> *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A <strong>VAT</strong> <strong>TAX</strong> WHICH WILL HELP THE<br />
<strong>DRUG</strong> DEALERS and illegals by making their tax free money leaving the<br />
country even more valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the <strong>RED</strong> money<br />
for <strong>GREEN</strong> money then you would charge the sales tax at that point.</p>
<p>Have the States Ratify an <strong>amendment</strong> withdrawing the 16th <strong>amendment</strong>&#8230;<br />
Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (<strong>Federal</strong> sales<br />
tax) *BUT NOT A <strong>VAT</strong> or VALUE ADDED <strong>TAX</strong>* with the same <strong>amendment</strong> that<br />
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a <strong>Federal</strong> *<strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ITEM</strong>* sales tax.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
*<strong>GREEN</strong>* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add to<br />
the <strong>amendment</strong> that *if congress raises any tax by* 1% *they are forced*<br />
*to cut*<br />
every single expenditure of the *government by* 3%.</p>
<p>Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
of our military bases along the southern <strong>Border</strong> to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the <strong>Border</strong> patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
<strong>Federal</strong> trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases.</p>
<p>This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
outside the <strong>USA</strong>. That will make it harder for <strong>smugglers</strong> to get money out<br />
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch <strong>smugglers</strong>. We<br />
are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
borrow like income tax does.</p>
<p>This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less <strong>welfare</strong> and charge them<br />
tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>Pass an <strong>amendment</strong> to the constitution that makes all<br />
*laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.</p>
<p>There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. And a<br />
constitutional <strong>amendment</strong> to limit the Interstate Commerce Clause. The<br />
politicians use that clause to justify all sorts of socialist <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>. The<br />
founding fathers never meant for it to be so broadly applied. Limit it<br />
with an <strong>amendment</strong>, so government can&#8217;t justify every crazy idea by<br />
saying its legal under the interstate commerce clause.</p>
<p>Pass another <strong>amendment</strong> creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP <strong>CONGRESS</strong> FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING <strong>MONEY</strong>.</p>
<p>To quit filling the jails with people over *<strong>social</strong> taboos* , we<br />
need to take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;<strong>social</strong> engineer&#8221; businesses or<br />
private people by removing the governments use of tax code to manipulate<br />
people.</p>
<p>Government needs to spend <strong>10</strong>% less every year until they meet the<br />
income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
force an across the board spending freeze and then across the board cuts<br />
on the government spending, to do that we have to include a law in our<br />
<strong>TAX</strong> <strong>amendment</strong> to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
federal sales tax increase would result in automatic spending cuts using<br />
a baseline of <strong>10</strong>% taxes.</p>
<p>And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
them fight their own fights. We also need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
committing, we need fewer police and prisons to support&#8230;. the above<br />
drug and tax plan, will reduce police and prison needs by at least that<br />
<strong>10</strong>% that this plan suggested cutting each year.</p>
<p>NO <strong>welfare</strong> to corporations, and cut <strong>welfare</strong> to private people by <strong>10</strong>%<br />
each year until it is <strong>10</strong>% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
in DEEP for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/10/18/the-original-plan-that-could-have-stopped-this-insanity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lack Of Illegal Aliens Hurting America</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/09/30/lack-of-illegal-aliens-hurting-america/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/09/30/lack-of-illegal-aliens-hurting-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegal Aliens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LIBERALS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarian Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=23554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 9/30/2011 2:35 PM, walt tonne wrote: > On Sep 30, 1:33 pm, &#8220;Mr.Sandman&#8221; wrote: >> According to Mayor Bloomberg of NYC, America is hurting right now >> because the number of illegal aliens has dropped from what it used to >> be. He believes this country needs more immigrants. Especially illegal >> ones. Watch [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 9/30/2011 2:35 PM, walt tonne wrote:<br />
> On Sep 30, 1:33 pm, &#8220;Mr.Sandman&#8221; <somewh ...@overtherainbow.com> wrote:<br />
>> According to Mayor Bloomberg of <strong>NYC</strong>, America is hurting right now<br />
>> because the number of illegal aliens has dropped from what it used to<br />
>> be. He believes this country needs more immigrants. Especially illegal<br />
>> ones. Watch this video interview with <strong>CNN</strong> John King.http://www.examiner.com/immigration-reform-in-national/bloomberg-says&#8230;<br />
><br />
> Screw that arrogant twisted <strong>New York</strong> kike!<br />
><br />
> <a href="http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/" >http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/</a>  The Occidental Observer<br />
></p>
<p>Send Bloomberg to <strong>Mexico</strong> to be a governor&#8230;..</p>
<p>That way he can be happy ruling over a bunch of low wage workers.</p>
<p></somewh></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/09/30/lack-of-illegal-aliens-hurting-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama will be giving a speech</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/09/06/obama-will-be-giving-a-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/09/06/obama-will-be-giving-a-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GREEN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prostitutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smugglers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=23320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have written and added to and rewritten this several times since the late Bush and early Obama Regimes created and made worse our economic problems. I heard Obama will be giving a speech that would call for less &#8220;regulation&#8221; and tax incentives and stability&#8230; Interestingly this is Obama paying lip service to the ideas [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have written and added to and rewritten this several times since the<br />
late Bush and early Obama Regimes created and made worse our economic<br />
problems.</p>
<p>I heard Obama will be giving a speech that would call for less<br />
&#8220;regulation&#8221; and tax incentives and stability&#8230;</p>
<p>Interestingly this is Obama paying lip service to the ideas that he has<br />
been against and been doing the opposite of, over the past three years.</p>
<p>+&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;+<br />
Reducing <strong>regulations</strong> is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more <strong>regulations</strong>, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
<strong>regulations</strong> are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression.</p>
<p>End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
<strong>prostitutes</strong> when there are so many legal tax paying <strong>prostitutes</strong> out there?</p>
<p><a href="http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs--crime-usage-falls" >http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs&#8211;crime-usage-falls</a></p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the <strong>USA</strong> and Original Green<br />
money outside the <strong>USA</strong>&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly sending red money home to <strong>Mexico</strong> would be useless as the <strong>RED</strong><br />
money would be useless in <strong>Mexico</strong> since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad. All electronic money leaving the <strong>USA</strong> would be debited the<br />
Sales tax when the money is sent/spent.</p>
<p>The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drug smuggling less*<br />
*profitable* as would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL<br />
“<strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ITEM</strong>” SALES <strong>TAX</strong> *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A <strong>VAT</strong> <strong>TAX</strong> WHICH WILL HELP THE<br />
<strong>DRUG</strong> DEALERS and illegals by making their tax free money leaving the<br />
country even more valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the <strong>RED</strong> money<br />
for <strong>GREEN</strong> money then you would charge the sales tax at that point.</p>
<p>Have the States Ratify an <strong>amendment</strong> withdrawing the 16th <strong>amendment</strong>&#8230;<br />
Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (<strong>Federal</strong> sales<br />
tax) *BUT NOT A <strong>VAT</strong> or VALUE ADDED <strong>TAX</strong>* with the same <strong>amendment</strong> that<br />
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a <strong>Federal</strong> *<strong>NEW</strong> <strong>ITEM</strong>* sales tax.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
*<strong>GREEN</strong>* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add to<br />
the <strong>amendment</strong> that if congress raises tax by 1% they are forced to cut<br />
every single expenditure of the government by 3%.</p>
<p>Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
of our military bases along the southern <strong>Border</strong> to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the <strong>Border</strong> patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
<strong>Federal</strong> trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases.</p>
<p>This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
outside the <strong>USA</strong>. That will make it harder for <strong>smugglers</strong> to get money out<br />
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch <strong>smugglers</strong>. We<br />
are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
borrow like income tax does.</p>
<p>This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less <strong>welfare</strong> and charge them<br />
tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>Pass an <strong>amendment</strong> to the constitution that makes all<br />
*laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.</p>
<p>There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. And a<br />
constitutional <strong>amendment</strong> to limit the Interstate Commerce Clause. The<br />
politicians use that clause to justify all sorts of socialist <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>. The<br />
founding fathers never meant for it to be so broadly applied. Limit it<br />
with an <strong>amendment</strong>, so government can&#8217;t justify every crazy idea by<br />
saying its legal under the interstate commerce clause.</p>
<p>Pass another <strong>amendment</strong> creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP <strong>CONGRESS</strong> FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING <strong>MONEY</strong>.</p>
<p>To quit filling the jails with people over *<strong>social</strong> taboos* , we<br />
need to take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;<strong>social</strong> engineer&#8221; businesses or<br />
private people by removing the governments use of tax code to manipulate<br />
people.</p>
<p>Government needs to spend <strong>10</strong>% less every year until they meet the<br />
income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
force an across the board spending freeze and then across the board cuts<br />
on the government spending, to do that we have to include a law in our<br />
<strong>TAX</strong> <strong>amendment</strong> to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
federal sales tax increase would result in automatic spending cuts using<br />
a baseline of <strong>10</strong>% taxes.</p>
<p>And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
them fight their own fights. We also need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
committing, we need fewer police and prisons to support&#8230;. the above<br />
drug and tax plan, will reduce police and prison needs by at least that<br />
<strong>10</strong>% that this plan suggested cutting each year.</p>
<p>NO <strong>welfare</strong> to corporations, and cut <strong>welfare</strong> to private people by <strong>10</strong>%<br />
each year until it is <strong>10</strong>% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
in DEEP for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/09/06/obama-will-be-giving-a-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A TEA PARTY BAIL OUT</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/21/a-tea-party-bail-out/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/21/a-tea-party-bail-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 02:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAIL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GREEN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PARTY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prostitutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smugglers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=22469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*A TEA PARTY BAIL OUT* give America back to Americans Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and competition would help us get out of this depression. End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*A TEA PARTY BAIL OUT*<br />
give America back to Americans</p>
<p>Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression.</p>
<p>End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
prostitutes when there are so many legal tax paying prostitutes out there?<br />
<a href="http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs--crime-usage-falls" >http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs&#8211;crime-usage-falls</a></p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED<br />
money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad. All electronic money leaving the USA would be debited the<br />
Sales tax when the money is sent/spent.</p>
<p>The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drug smuggling less*<br />
*profitable* as would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL<br />
“NEW ITEM” SALES TAX *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE<br />
DRUG DEALERS and illegals by making their tax free money leaving the<br />
country even more valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the RED money<br />
for GREEN money then you would charge the sales tax at that point.</p>
<p>Have the States Ratify an amendment withdrawing the 16th amendment&#8230;<br />
Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (Federal sales<br />
tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED TAX* with the same amendment that<br />
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a Federal *NEW ITEM* sales tax.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
*GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add to<br />
the amendment that if congress raises tax by 1% they are forced to cut<br />
every single expenditure of the government by 3%.</p>
<p>Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
of our military bases along the southern Border to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the Border patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
Federal trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases.</p>
<p>This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
outside the USA. That will make it harder for smugglers to get money out<br />
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch smugglers. We<br />
are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
borrow like income tax does.</p>
<p>This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less welfare and charge them<br />
tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>Pass an amendment to the constitution that makes all<br />
*laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.</p>
<p>There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. And a<br />
constitutional amendment to limit the Interstate Commerce Clause. The<br />
politicians use that clause to justify all sorts of socialist <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>. The<br />
founding fathers never meant for it to be so broadly applied. Limit it<br />
with an amendment, so government can&#8217;t justify every crazy idea by<br />
saying its legal under the interstate commerce clause.</p>
<p>Pass another amendment creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP CONGRESS FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING MONEY.</p>
<p>To quit filling the jails with people over *social taboos* , we<br />
need to take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;social engineer&#8221; businesses or<br />
private people by removing the governments use of tax code to manipulate<br />
people.</p>
<p>Government needs to spend 10% less every year until they meet the<br />
income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
force an across the board spending freeze and then across the board cuts<br />
on the government spending, to do that we have to include a law in our<br />
TAX amendment to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
federal sales tax increase would result in automatic spending cuts using<br />
a baseline of 10% taxes.</p>
<p>And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
them fight their own fights. We also need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
committing, we need fewer police and prisons to support&#8230;. the above<br />
drug and tax plan, will reduce police and prison needs by at least that<br />
10% that this plan suggested cutting each year.</p>
<p>NO welfare to corporations, and cut welfare to private people by 10%<br />
each year until it is 10% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
in DEEP for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/21/a-tea-party-bail-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An amendment that if congress raises tax by 1% they are forced to cut,every single expenditure of the government by 3%</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/13/an-amendment-that-if-congress-raises-tax-by-1-they-are-forced-to-cutevery-single-expenditure-of-the-government-by-3/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/13/an-amendment-that-if-congress-raises-tax-by-1-they-are-forced-to-cutevery-single-expenditure-of-the-government-by-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GREEN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prostitutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smugglers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=22359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*HOW TO ALLOW AMERICA TO SURVIVE* And give America back to Americans Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and competition would help us get out of this depression. End the &#8220;war on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*HOW TO ALLOW AMERICA TO SURVIVE*<br />
And give America back to Americans</p>
<p>Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression.</p>
<p>End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
prostitutes when there are so many legal tax paying prostitutes out there?</p>
<p><a href="http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs--crime-usage-falls" >http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs&#8211;crime-usage-falls</a></p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED<br />
money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad. All electronic money leaving the USA would be debited the<br />
Sales tax when the money is sent/spent.</p>
<p>The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drug smuggling less*<br />
*profitable* as would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL<br />
“NEW ITEM” SALES TAX *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE<br />
DRUG DEALERS and illegals by making their tax free money leaving the<br />
country even more valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the RED money<br />
for GREEN money then you would charge the sales tax at that point.</p>
<p>Have the States Ratify an amendment withdrawing the 16th amendment&#8230;<br />
Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (Federal sales<br />
tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED TAX* with the same amendment that<br />
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a Federal *NEW ITEM* sales tax.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
*GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add to<br />
the amendment that if congress raises tax by 1% they are forced to cut<br />
every single expenditure of the government by 3%.</p>
<p>Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
of our military bases along the southern Border to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the Border patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
Federal trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases.</p>
<p>This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
outside the USA. That will make it harder for smugglers to get money out<br />
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch smugglers. We<br />
are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
borrow like income tax does.</p>
<p>This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less welfare and charge them<br />
tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>Pass an amendment to the constitution that makes all<br />
*laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.</p>
<p>There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. And a<br />
constitutional amendment to limit the Interstate Commerce Clause. The<br />
politicians use that clause to justify all sorts of socialist <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>. The<br />
founding fathers never meant for it to be so broadly applied. Limit it<br />
with an amendment, so government can&#8217;t justify every crazy idea by<br />
saying its legal under the interstate commerce clause.</p>
<p>Pass another amendment creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP CONGRESS FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING MONEY.</p>
<p>To quit filling the jails with people over *social taboos* , we<br />
need to take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;social engineer&#8221; businesses or<br />
private people by removing the governments use of tax code to manipulate<br />
people.</p>
<p>Government needs to spend 10% less every year until they meet the<br />
income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
force an across the board spending freeze and then across the board cuts<br />
on the government spending, to do that we have to include a law in our<br />
TAX amendment to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
federal sales tax increase would result in automatic spending cuts using<br />
a baseline of 10% taxes.</p>
<p>And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
them fight their own fights. We also need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
committing, we need fewer police and prisons to support&#8230;. the above<br />
drug and tax plan, will reduce police and prison needs by at least that<br />
10% that this plan suggested cutting each year.</p>
<p>NO welfare to corporations, and cut welfare to private people by 10%<br />
each year until it is 10% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
in DEEP for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/13/an-amendment-that-if-congress-raises-tax-by-1-they-are-forced-to-cutevery-single-expenditure-of-the-government-by-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The colossal ignorance of &#8220;Obama the Socialist&#8221;!!!!!!  Either way Obama&#8217;s unfit to be President of this Nation.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/10/the-colossal-ignorance-of-obama-the-socialist-either-way-obamas-unfit-to-be-president-of-this-nation/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/10/the-colossal-ignorance-of-obama-the-socialist-either-way-obamas-unfit-to-be-president-of-this-nation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 05:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Either Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forest Gump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leftist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NANCY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOB]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=22243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This guy almost says it all: ["""[Let's think about this... The President has taken legal action to prevent state and city police officials from obtaining the immigration status of an individual taken into custody for a criminal act, but the President wants those states and city officials to inform foreign nationals of their international right [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This guy almost says it all:</p>
<p>["""[Let's think about this... The President has taken legal action to<br />
prevent state and city police officials from obtaining the immigration<br />
status of an individual taken into custody for a criminal act, but the<br />
President wants those states and city officials to inform foreign<br />
nationals of their international right to diplomatic counsel if they are<br />
arrested on US soil without being able to legally ascertain their<br />
immigration status. This administration has no foundational principles,<br />
so it pursues policies that are so impractical as to be diametrically<br />
opposed to each other.]&#8220;&#8221;"]</p>
<p>Either Obama is the dumbest SOB on the planet or he&#8217;s the second from<br />
the dumbest.</p>
<p>Just how can local police give illegals information about diplomatic<br />
council privileges, When Obama is NOT allowing the local police to<br />
determine whether or not someone is a foreign national and or illegally<br />
here and NOT a U.S. citizen.</p>
<p>The colossal ignorance of &#8220;Obama the Socialist&#8221; is absolutely amazing.<br />
This is as bad as NANCY PELOSI saying that &#8220;WE&#8221; have to pass a law to<br />
see what&#8217;s in it. Now Obama feels he can run guns into Mexico and break<br />
U.S. and Mexican and international laws and at the same time create a<br />
Paradoxical legal maze for State and local police and average American<br />
citizens, and not Obama nor Democrats have a clue that we&#8217;re all<br />
catching on to the Leftist plans to cripple the U.S. constitutional<br />
process.  Obama is either trying to destroy the constitution or he&#8217;s<br />
Forest Gump come to life.   Either way he&#8217;s unfit to be President of<br />
this Nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/10/the-colossal-ignorance-of-obama-the-socialist-either-way-obamas-unfit-to-be-president-of-this-nation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>That&#8217;s the official version, anyway &#8212; but it&#8217;s crumbling</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/09/thats-the-official-version-anyway-but-its-crumbling/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/09/thats-the-official-version-anyway-but-its-crumbling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Grassley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenneth Melson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last Updated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MICHAEL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rene Arce Islas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WALSH]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=22213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8216;Fast &#038; Furious&#8217; gets hotter for Holder By MICHAEL A. WALSH *Last Updated:* 4:26 AM, July 7, 2011 *Posted:* 10:20 PM, July 6, 2011 Don&#8217;t look now, but the real action in Washington this week isn&#8217;t the partisan wrangling over the debt ceiling but something &#8212; literally &#8211; even more incendiary: Operation Fast and Furious, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Fast &#038; Furious&#8217; gets hotter for Holder</p>
<p>By MICHAEL A. WALSH</p>
<p>*Last Updated:* 4:26 AM, July 7, 2011</p>
<p>*Posted:* 10:20 PM, July 6, 2011</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t look now, but the real action in Washington this week isn&#8217;t the<br />
partisan wrangling over the debt ceiling but something &#8212; literally &#8211;<br />
even more incendiary: Operation Fast and Furious, which seems about to<br />
explode right in the face of Attorney General Eric Holder &#8212; and maybe<br />
other administration officials, too.</p>
<p>Also known as Project Gunrunner, the Arizona-based operation was<br />
supposed to be a sting, under which the federal Bureau of Alcohol,<br />
Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, which is part of the Justice<br />
Department, allowed &#8220;straw purchasers&#8221; to transfer weapons from gun<br />
shops in Arizona to Mexican drug cartels to trace and halt crossborder<br />
arms-trafficking.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the official version, anyway &#8212; but it&#8217;s crumbling, *fast*.</p>
<p>The ATF&#8217;s acting director, Kenneth Melson, has been singing like a<br />
canary to congressional investigators as he pushes back against<br />
administration pressure for him to resign and take the fall for<br />
something that, at the very least, had to include the US Attorney&#8217;s<br />
Office, the FBI, the Drug Enforcement Administration and possibly the<br />
Homeland Security Department.</p>
<p>In a letter to Holder released yesterday, Rep. Daryl Issa and Sen. Chuck<br />
Grassley accused the Justice Department of blocking their investigation<br />
into the burgeoning scandal (which has resulted in the deaths of at<br />
least two American agents and countless Mexican civilians), muzzling the<br />
ATF and involving other federal agencies, including the FBI and the DEA,<br />
in funding the crackpot scheme.</p>
<p>&#8220;The evidence we have gathered raises the disturbing possibility that<br />
the Justice Department not only allowed criminals to smuggle weapons,<br />
but that taxpayer dollars from other agencies may have financed those<br />
engaging in such activities,&#8221; they wrote.</p>
<p>&#8220;It is one thing to argue that the ends justify the means in an attempt<br />
to defend a policy that puts building a big case ahead of stopping known<br />
criminals from getting guns. Yet it is a much more serious matter to<br />
conceal from Congress the possible involvement of other agencies in<br />
identifying and maybe even working with the same criminals that<br />
Operation Fast and Furious was trying to identify.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the *key* to this mess &#8212; and the reason that Operation Fast and<br />
Furious might turn out to be the biggest Washington scandal since<br />
Iran-Contra.</p>
<p>As Issa and Grassley note in their letter, had the other agencies shared<br />
information &#8212; theoretically the goal of the post-9/11 revamp of the<br />
intelligence and law-enforcement agencies &#8212; &#8220;then ATF might have known<br />
that gun trafficking &#8216;higher-ups&#8217; had already been identified.&#8221;</p>
<p>So if the identities of the Mexican criminals were known to the feds,<br />
what was the point of Project Gunrunner &#8212; and why is Holder so<br />
desperately trying to stonewall by withholding hundreds of documents<br />
from Congress?</p>
<p>Law-abiding gun owners and dealers think they already know. With the<br />
Obama administration wedded to the fiction that 90 percent of the guns<br />
Mexican cartels use originate *here* &#8212; they don&#8217;t &#8212; many suspect that<br />
&#8220;Fast and Furious&#8221; was a backdoor attempt to smear *domestic* gun<br />
aficionados as part of its stealth efforts on gun control by executive fiat.</p>
<p>&#8220;I just want you to know that we&#8217;re working on it,&#8221; Obama was quoted as<br />
saying to gun-control advocate Sarah Brady in March. &#8220;We have to go<br />
through a few processes, but under the radar.&#8221;</p>
<p>Unfortunately for the administration, this one&#8217;s out in the open now.</p>
<p>Melson testified behind closed doors on July 4, but the country needs to<br />
hear him speak &#8212; loudly and publicly. &#8220;Let me be clear,&#8221; Issa wrote to<br />
Melson in April, &#8220;we are not conducting a concurrent investigation<br />
*with*the Department of Justice, but rather an independent<br />
investigation *of* the Department of Justice.&#8221;</p>
<p>Exactly. Because this one&#8217;s not just a domestic issue. A Mexican<br />
senator, Rene Arce Islas, told Fox News that he believes whoever is<br />
responsible for the monumental, lethal <acronym title="cock"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%k</span></acronym>-up should be tried not only<br />
in America but in Mexico, too.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not going to happen, of course. Even if any prominent American<br />
officials are implicated, there is zero chance they&#8217;d have to face<br />
Mexican justice.</p>
<p>But Issa&#8217;s charge that Holder &#038; Co. are obstructing a congressional<br />
investigation is serious. Not even the Justice Department is above the law.</p>
<p>The best way to disinfect the putrid mess that is Operation Fast and<br />
Furious is to expose it to sunlight. Let&#8217;s hear what the attorney<br />
general and others have to say in open hearings.</p>
<p>Because somebody&#8217;s got some &#8220;splainin&#8217; &#8221; to do &#8212; fast, before the<br />
American people get furious.</p>
<p>Read more:<br />
<a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/fast_furious_gets_hotter_for_holder_wDCoBUrOxYF8r1GobKS89M#ixzz1RcH0TBue" >http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/fast_furious_gets_hotter_for_holder_wDCoBUrOxYF8r1GobKS89M#ixzz1RcH0TBue</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/09/thats-the-official-version-anyway-but-its-crumbling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Map shows Mexican invasion of United States</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/05/map-shows-mexican-invasion-of-united-states/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/05/map-shows-mexican-invasion-of-united-states/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 06:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Mon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PDT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=22039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 7/4/2011 6:36 PM, John Smith wrote: > On 7/4/2011 11:00 AM, Sancho Panza wrote: >> On 7/4/2011 12:18 PM, Kickin&#8217; A&#038;*$?%s and Takin&#8217; Names wrote: >>> On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 04:56:28 -0700 (PDT), walt tonne >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Jul 4, 12:17 am, Hisler wrote: >>>>> This was sent my way by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 7/4/2011 6:36 PM, John Smith wrote:<br />
> On 7/4/2011 11:00 AM, Sancho Panza wrote:<br />
>> On 7/4/2011 12:18 PM, Kickin&#8217; <acronym title="Ass"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> A&*$?%s</span></acronym> and Takin&#8217; Names wrote:<br />
>>> On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 04:56:28 -0700 (PDT), walt tonne<br />
>>> <tonnewalt487 @gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>> On Jul 4, 12:17 am, Hisler<his ...@<acronym title="cocks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%s</span></acronym>.net> wrote:<br />
>>>>> This was sent my way by the old API poster, &#8220;Lets Roll.&#8221; It shows the<br />
>>>>> massive invasion of border states (and Nevada) by Mestizos from<br />
>>>>> Hispanic<br />
>>>>> failed nations south of the border:<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> <a href="http://projects.nytimes.com/census/2010/map?nl=todaysheadlines&#038;emc=thab1" >http://projects.nytimes.com/census/2010/map?nl=todaysheadlines&#038;emc=thab1</a><br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> Check out the census map. Look at the counties near the border.<br />
>>>>> We have all but ceded the entire southern half of the US to Mexico.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Only a fat-assed degenerate people would tolerate policies that permit<br />
>>>> the<br />
>>>> destruction of their homeland.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> <a href="http://www.vdare.com/" >http://www.vdare.com/</a> V-Dare<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>> Does it not occur to you morons that MEXICO was there first? Why do<br />
>>> all the cities, towns, rivers, geographic features, and the like in<br />
>>> the SW USofA have HISPANIC names?? BECAUSE THE SPANISH AND MEXICANS<br />
>>> WERE THERE FIRST AND WE STOLE IT FROM THEM, YOU IMBECILES.</p>
<p>Steal is such a harsh word&#8230;.   those &#8220;Spanish named&#8221; places were taxed<br />
and were where Social Justice was invoked and the Spanish benefited from<br />
the Multicultural interactions.</p>
<p>The fact those places made a choice to be part of the USA was their own<br />
choice&#8230;  we didn&#8217;t build a fence to keep them in the USA.</p>
<p></his></tonnewalt487></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/05/map-shows-mexican-invasion-of-united-states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If Anthony Weiner isn&#8217;t going to live up to his MARRIAGE vows then he also won&#8217;t live up to his OATH OF OFFICE.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/25/if-anthony-weiner-isnt-going-to-live-up-to-his-marriage-vows-then-he-also-wont-live-up-to-his-oath-of-office-89/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/25/if-anthony-weiner-isnt-going-to-live-up-to-his-marriage-vows-then-he-also-wont-live-up-to-his-oath-of-office-89/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 19:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anthony Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dream Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MARRIAGE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OATH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=21753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 6/24/2011 4:35 PM, RD Sandman wrote: > Bob LeChevalier wrote in > news:613907l9nkuu7461omgfkr07mnb6olkkh3 @&#038;*$?%4ax.com: > >> RD Sandman wrote: >>> Bob LeChevalier wrote in >>> news:sj7707p8tg14ttr9alpainrl4p4ln3nrg4 @&#038;*$?%4ax.com: >>> >>>> &#8220;Scout&#8221; wrote: >>>>> &#8220;Bob LeChevalier&#8221; wrote in message >>>>> news:mh0407tp29st1hamukebao3gon2omhlic0 @&#038;*$?%4ax.com&#8230; >>>>>> RD Sandman wrote: >>>>>>> Yep, the individual mandate where failure to purchase a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 6/24/2011 4:35 PM, RD Sandman wrote:<br />
> Bob LeChevalier <lojbab @lojban.org> wrote in<br />
> news:613907l9nkuu7461omgfkr07mnb6olkkh3<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>4ax.com:<br />
><br />
>> RD Sandman <rdsandman @comcast[remove].net> wrote:<br />
>>> Bob LeChevalier <lojbab @lojban.org> wrote in<br />
>>> news:sj7707p8tg14ttr9alpainrl4p4ln3nrg4<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>4ax.com:<br />
>>><br />
>>>> &#8220;Scout&#8221; <me4guns @verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:<br />
>>>>> &#8220;Bob LeChevalier&#8221; <lojbab @lojban.org> wrote in message<br />
>>>>> news:mh0407tp29st1hamukebao3gon2omhlic0<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>4ax.com&#8230;<br />
>>>>>> RD Sandman <rdsandman @comcast[remove].net> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> Yep, the individual mandate where failure to purchase a product<br />
> from<br />
>>>>>>> a private sector entity can possibly result in prison time.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> As long as you keep lying, I will keep correcting you.  The act<br />
>>>>>> specifically says that there are no criminal penalties for<br />
>>>>>> noncompliance.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> So your contention then is that he can&#8217;t be jailed for failing to pay<br />
>>>>> the taxes called for in this act for non-compliance?<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> The law says explicitly that there are no criminal penalties.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> That does not mean that there are no civil penalties, but those don&#8217;t<br />
>>>> result in going to jail.<br />
>>><br />
>>> At some time or another, a punishment does need to arise.<br />
>><br />
>> That journalist mentioned in a recent post &#8211; he will face some penalty<br />
>> for admitting that he is illegal.  Probably not a criminal penalty,<br />
>> and possibly not even a formal penalty.<br />
>><br />
>> But now he is going to be watched more closely and trusted less, both<br />
>> by the government and by private parties that now have to knowingly<br />
>> break the law in order to hire him.<br />
><br />
> Yep&#8230;&#8230;I am in favor of most of the Dream Act.  I have nothing against<br />
> the people coming here to work and earn money for their families. After<br />
> all, if the economies of the two countries were reversed, I would be<br />
> migrating south.</p>
<p>You mean to Mexico where their President says they arrest and deport all<br />
illegals&#8230; but that&#8217;s usually after they get abused by police and the<br />
Coyotes who traffic in human smuggling.</p>
<p>><br />
> Those in here who know me know that the folks I dislike intensely are<br />
> those coyotes who bring the illegals here and the folks here who transfer<br />
> their hate to all Mexicans including the homegrown.<br />
></p>
<p></rdsandman></lojbab></me4guns></lojbab></rdsandman></lojbab></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/25/if-anthony-weiner-isnt-going-to-live-up-to-his-marriage-vows-then-he-also-wont-live-up-to-his-oath-of-office-89/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A big slobbering thank you to the unions</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/23/a-big-slobbering-thank-you-to-the-unions/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/23/a-big-slobbering-thank-you-to-the-unions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leftist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[owned]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=21659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 6/23/2011 8:44 AM, Neal Boortz wrote: > Here is yet another example why our economy is sputtering. Businesses don&#8217;t > like unions. Unions have destroyed many American businesses. Look at > Detroit. It&#8217;s a wreck. Unions did to Detroit what that tornado did to > Tuscaloosa and what Hugo did to Homestead, Florida. Homestead [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 6/23/2011 8:44 AM, Neal Boortz wrote:<br />
> Here is yet another example why our economy is sputtering.  Businesses don&#8217;t<br />
> like unions.  Unions have destroyed many American businesses.  Look at<br />
> Detroit.  It&#8217;s a wreck.  Unions did to Detroit what that tornado did to<br />
> Tuscaloosa and what Hugo did to Homestead, Florida.  Homestead was rebuilt,<br />
> and Tuscaloosa will be.  This because they know that there is little<br />
> likelihood that these storms will return with this ferocity &#8211; and they will<br />
> be rebuilt stronger. Businesses &#8211; particularly the auto industry &#8211; will not<br />
> be so anxious to rebuild Detroit because these businesses know that the<br />
> unions are still lurking in the shadows in Michigan ready to strike &#8211; ready<br />
> to throw sand into the gears of any engine of economic recovery.  Ready to<br />
> destroy again.</p>
<p>You have to admit that government and Organized crime mobsters are very<br />
much alike in how they do business &#8220;kickbacks and all&#8221; so they would<br />
eventually have to but heads or merge and it looks like they have merged<br />
into a Progressive movement.</p>
<p>The Unions were taken over by the Socialists years ago when the Mafia<br />
was thrown out. The Socialist want to do harm to capitalism (take the<br />
freedom out of it) and force the cities to accept their brand of<br />
Socialism with easy money and pay-offs for them.  Having Progressive<br />
owned Unions is like having two Governments waring with one another.</p>
<p>The Unions were handed their <acronym title="ass"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> a&*$?%s</span></acronym> in a basket the last time that the<br />
Mafia tried to get into government via the bribes and corruption in the<br />
unions, this time the criminal types are claiming it&#8217;s political<br />
activity and &#8220;Democracy&#8221; rather than criminal organized crime activity.</p>
<p>Truth is it&#8217;s the same game just new players, they are laundering money<br />
and buying influence and stealing from taxpayers. The MOB BOSSES are now<br />
called Community Organizers and the (PAC) Political Action committees<br />
like ACORN run the Prostitution and the drug running, Oh yes the<br />
Socialist MOBSTERS have learned and what they learned was to create<br />
shadow and front organizations to keep their prize organizations like<br />
the UNIONS looking clean.  These Progressive Mobsters actually hide<br />
behind the political system rather than fight it like the Italian Mafia<br />
did. They subvert the constitution rather than outright violating it.<br />
They are the enemy within.</p>
<p>Progressives and Socialists are the Al Capone and *John Gotti* of today.<br />
Notice there is no real Organized</p>
<p>They attack the other gangs like Israel our onetime friend, and Qaddafi<br />
in Libya who we had no political reason to declare war on.  And suck up<br />
to the communist and Socialist leaders like the ones in Venezuela and<br />
Columbia.  And they force &#8220;us&#8221; to buy their INSURANCE with laws that<br />
make you pay for insurance or pay for not having their insurance, WHAT A<br />
RACKET? Al Capone and *John Gotti*  would be proud to see a MOBSTER scam<br />
that has you paying, coming and going.</p>
<p>You might even call them the Leftist Mafia considering the success of<br />
their *owning JUDGES* and *laundering political contributions* via the<br />
UNIONS. They took over the Democrat party which is now just a<br />
Progressive Mobster Party and they did that with the power of their<br />
UNIONS, there are no Democrats they are all Progressive-Socialist<br />
MOBSTERS now.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t leave out the Republican Party, they&#8217;re after the control of the<br />
Republican Party too&#8230;.  Progressives are the Party of Organized Crime.</p>
<p>Their Facade of a BOSS, coming from Chicago is NOT a surprise, it was<br />
destined to happen.</p>
<p>A</p>
<p>Evsei Agron<br />
Rafael Aguilar Guajardo<br />
Albert Anastasia<br />
Benjamín Arellano Félix<br />
Ramón Arellano Félix<br />
Movladi Atlangeriyev</p>
<p>B</p>
<p>Marat Balagula<br />
Leroy Barnes<br />
Alfredo Beltrán Leyva<br />
Héctor Beltrán Leyva<br />
Arturo Beltrán Leyva<br />
Donovan Bennett<br />
Joseph Bonanno<br />
Klaas Bruinsma (drug lord)<br />
Ali Budesh<br />
James J. Bulger</p>
<p>C</p>
<p>Martin Cahill<br />
*Al Capone*<br />
Mario Cárdenas Guillén<br />
Osiel Cárdenas Guillén<br />
Miguel Caro Quintero<br />
Rafael Caro Quintero<br />
Amado Carrillo Fuentes<br />
Vito Cascioferro<br />
Rafael Cedeño Hernández<br />
Emilio Changco<br />
Chen Chi-li<br />
Peter Chong (criminal)<br />
Joseph Civello<br />
Christopher Coke<br />
*Mad Dog Coll*<br />
James Coonan<br />
Nicholas Corozzo</p>
<p>D</p>
<p>Boris Dekanidze<br />
Tom Dennison (political boss)<br />
Princ Dobroshi<br />
Du Yuesheng<br />
Vitali Dyomochka</p>
<p>E</p>
<p>Thomas Egan (gangster)<br />
Pablo Escobar<br />
Alberto Espinoza Barrón</p>
<p>F</p>
<p>Raúl Lucio Fernandez-Lechuga<br />
Marcel Francisci</p>
<p>G</p>
<p>*Vito Genovese*</p>
<p>G cont.</p>
<p>John Gilligan (Irish criminal)<br />
Anthony Gizzo<br />
*John Gotti*<br />
Danny Greene<br />
Joaquín Guzmán Loera</p>
<p>H</p>
<p>Charles Hitchen<br />
Larry Hoover<br />
Héctor Huerta Ríos<br />
Gerry Hutch</p>
<p>I</p>
<p>Dawood Ibrahim<br />
Jacky Imbert<br />
Vyacheslav Ivankov</p>
<p>J</p>
<p>Bumpy Johnson<br />
Enoch L. Johnson</p>
<p>K</p>
<p>Pappu Kalani<br />
Dündar K?l?ç<br />
Donald Killeen<br />
Yoshio Kodama<br />
Kray twins<br />
*Vladimir Kumarin*</p>
<p>L</p>
<p>Meyer Lansky<br />
Carlos Lehder<br />
Salvatore Lo Piccolo<br />
John Patrick Looney<br />
Dionicio Loya Plancarte<br />
Frank Lucas (drug lord)<br />
Tommy Lucchese<br />
*Lucky Luciano*</p>
<p>M</p>
<p>Kenneth McGriff<br />
Hisayuki Machii<br />
James McLean (mobster)<br />
François Marcantoni<br />
Joseph Massino<br />
Flavio Méndez Santiago<br />
José de Jesús Méndez Vargas<br />
Matteo Messina Denaro<br />
List of Mexico&#8217;s 37 most-wanted drug lords<br />
Sergei Mikhailov (businessman)<br />
Felix Mitchell<br />
Sai Wing Mock<br />
Semion Mogilevich<br />
Diego León Montoya Sánchez<br />
Bugs Moran<br />
*Nazario Moreno González*</p>
<p>N</p>
<p>Sigifredo Nájera-Talamantes<br />
Nam Cam<br />
Eddie Nash<br />
Boris Nayfeld<br />
Juan Nepomuceno Guerra<br />
*Khozh-Ahmed Noukhayev*</p>
<p>O</p>
<p>Tariel Oniani</p>
<p>P</p>
<p>Reuben Parsons<br />
Santiago Luis Polanco Rodríguez</p>
<p>R</p>
<p>Bada Rajan<br />
Chotta Rajan<br />
Salvatore Riina<br />
José Gonzalo Rodríguez Gacha<br />
Gilberto Rodríguez Orejuela<br />
Carlos Rosales Mendoza<br />
Zeev Rosenstein<br />
Ricky Ross (drug trafficker)<br />
Sergio Enrique Ruiz-Tlapanco</p>
<p>S</p>
<p>Khun Sa<br />
Gregorio Sauceda-Gamboa<br />
Dutch Schultz<br />
Paul Sciacca<br />
Kenichi Shinoda<br />
Bugsy Siegel<br />
Soapy Smith<br />
Stephanie St. Clair<br />
Nikolay Suleimanov<br />
Al Swearengen</p>
<p>T</p>
<p>Omid Tahvili<br />
Tokutaro Takayama<br />
Tan Kim Ching<br />
Kazuo Taoka<br />
John Traynor (criminal)<br />
Robert Trimbole</p>
<p>U</p>
<p>Aslan Usoyan</p>
<p>V</p>
<p>Iván Velázquez-Caballero<br />
Calogero Vizzini</p>
<p>W</p>
<p>Wan Kuok-koi<br />
Yoshinori Watanabe<br />
*Melvin Williams* (actor)<br />
Howie Winter<br />
Adam Worth</p>
<p>Y</p>
<p>*Yang Fuqing*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/23/a-big-slobbering-thank-you-to-the-unions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mexico, 13 other nations say Utah illegal immigration law could strain diplomatic relations</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/10/mexico-13-other-nations-say-utah-illegal-immigration-law-could-strain-diplomatic-relations/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/10/mexico-13-other-nations-say-utah-illegal-immigration-law-could-strain-diplomatic-relations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[owned]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=21216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 6/10/2011 12:57 PM, Billy wrote: > In article > &#60;234310ad-5871-43d6-87b8-cb5efe4398a1 @&#038;*$?%s16g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, > walt tonne wrote: > >> On Jun 8, 8:15 pm, &#8220;f. barnes&#8221; wrote: >>> http://www.deseretnews.com/article/705374152/Mexico-13-other-nations-&#8230; >>> >>> By Dennis Romboy, Deseret News >>> >>> SALT LAKE CITY ‹ More than a dozen Latin and South American countries >>> have joined Mexico in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 6/10/2011 12:57 PM, Billy wrote:<br />
> In article<br />
> &lt;234310ad-5871-43d6-87b8-cb5efe4398a1<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>s16g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,<br />
>  walt tonne <tonnewalt487 @gmail.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> On Jun 8, 8:15 pm, &#8220;f. barnes&#8221; <fre ...@centurytel.net> wrote:<br />
>>> <a href="http://www.deseretnews.com/article/705374152/Mexico-13-other-nations-..." >http://www.deseretnews.com/article/705374152/Mexico-13-other-nations-&#8230;</a><br />
>>><br />
>>> By Dennis Romboy, Deseret News<br />
>>><br />
>>> SALT LAKE CITY ‹ More than a dozen Latin and South American countries<br />
>>> have joined Mexico in expressing potential international fallout over<br />
>>> Utah&#8217;s illegal immigration enforcement law.<br />
>>><br />
> Let&#8217;s face it Kluxer, legality has nothing to do with it. You&#8217;re just<br />
> unhappy that they aren&#8217;t WASPs. Grow up.<br />
><br />
> <a href="http://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20110609/ARTICLES/110609365/1350?Ti" >http://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20110609/ARTICLES/110609365/1350?Ti</a><br />
> tle=Latino-owned-businesses-on-the-rise-in-Sonoma-County><br />
> Latino-owned businesses are on the rise</p>
<p>Only so many Mexican Restaurants will survive and in ObamaLand it is<br />
going to be really hard to survive if Obama manages to get re-elected.</p>
<p></fre></tonnewalt487></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/10/mexico-13-other-nations-say-utah-illegal-immigration-law-could-strain-diplomatic-relations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big oil does it again</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/10/big-oil-does-it-again/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/10/big-oil-does-it-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=21198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 6/10/2011 10:16 AM, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote: > On 10/06/2011 14:38, Bert Hyman wrote: >> In news:dqh9c8-id5.ln1 @&#038;*$?%main-server.grobelnik.de Fred Kinleborg >> wrote: >> >>> Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote: >>> >>>>> Exxon Mobil said Wednesday it has discovered an estimated 700 >>>>> million barrels of oil equivalent at a deepwater well off the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 6/10/2011 10:16 AM, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:<br />
> On 10/06/2011 14:38, Bert Hyman wrote:<br />
>> In news:dqh9c8-id5.ln1<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>main-server.grobelnik.de Fred Kinleborg<br />
>> <newsfk .25.gral<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>spamgourmet.com>  wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>> Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> Exxon Mobil said Wednesday it has discovered an estimated 700<br />
>>>>> million barrels of oil equivalent at a deepwater well off the<br />
>>>>> Louisiana coast, a major find that a top House Republican argued<br />
>>>>> should push the administration to speed up offshore permitting.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> &#8220;This is one of the largest discoveries in the Gulf of Mexico in<br />
>>>>> the last decade,” Exxon Mobil Exploration Company President Steve<br />
>>>>> Greenlee said in a statement.<br />
>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> That&#8217;s enough to keep the USA going for almost a month!<br />
>>><br />
>>> Around 34 days &#8230;&#8230;<br />
>><br />
>> The same could be said for many of the thousands of individual drilling<br />
>> sites around the world.<br />
>><br />
>> Are you suggesting that all of them be abandoned because each one,<br />
>> individually, can&#8217;t supply our needs forever?<br />
><br />
> No, I&#8217;m saying that wrecking the planet in order to keep civilization<br />
> going that extra year or two is not the way to go<br />
></p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>What will be the point if we are dead, and the planet is pristine.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like throwing yourself under the wheels of your pristine Ferrari<br />
and being killed so you can keep it from getting the paint scratched.</p>
<p>What difference will it make?</p>
<p>When a tree falls in the forest&#8230;.  or better yet, when a forest dies<br />
in the universe&#8230;?</p>
<p></newsfk></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/10/big-oil-does-it-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I want to cut off US foreign aid to you!</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/05/09/i-want-to-cut-off-us-foreign-aid-to-you/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/05/09/i-want-to-cut-off-us-foreign-aid-to-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 23:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=20328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 5/6/2011 1:13 PM, Dex wrote: > On 06/05/2011 18:09, Dogfight wrote: >> >> &#8220;Lon Jimmes&#8221; wrote in message >> news:b69158dd-6631-4704-a090-323e00e9f363 @&#038;*$?%k27g2000pri.googlegroups.com&#8230; >>> HEADLINE: Ron Paul to Israel: I want to cut off US foreign aid to you! >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> OVERVIEW: Ron Paul is saying that if he becomes president, he [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 5/6/2011 1:13 PM, Dex wrote:<br />
> On 06/05/2011 18:09, Dogfight wrote:<br />
>><br />
>> &#8220;Lon Jimmes&#8221; <corvus200 @gmail.com> wrote in message<br />
>> news:b69158dd-6631-4704-a090-323e00e9f363<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>k27g2000pri.googlegroups.com&#8230;<br />
>>> HEADLINE: Ron Paul to Israel: I want to cut off US foreign aid to you!<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>> OVERVIEW: Ron Paul is saying that if he becomes president, he will cut<br />
>>> off ALL foreign aid to Israel, dooming them to Arab wrath.<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>><br />
>> Arab wrath? Not too much for Israel to worry about there. He must have<br />
>> forgotten that Israel has the bomb and would use it if their backs were<br />
>> up against the wall.<br />
><br />
> Using a nuke against a neighbouring country is dumb, especially if the<br />
> wind is blowing the wrong way.</p>
<p>Tactical nuclear weapons are small and we exploded big nuclear weapons<br />
in New Mexico/ Nevada didn&#8217;t we?</p>
<p>Stupid is provoking the Israelis to unleash that hell upon yourself!</p>
<p>Muslims need to get a grip and learn to live and let live&#8230;.  or learn<br />
how to die in mass.</p>
<p></corvus200></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/05/09/i-want-to-cut-off-us-foreign-aid-to-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global warming already crimping crop production</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/05/05/global-warming-already-crimping-crop-production/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/05/05/global-warming-already-crimping-crop-production/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 21:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=20216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 5/5/2011 4:20 PM, P&#038;*$?%s wrote: > On 5/5/2011 12:42 PM, Roger Coppock wrote: >> Report: Global warming already crimping crop production, pushing >> prices higher >> By Brian Vastag and Juliet Eilperin, Updated: Thursday, May 5, 11:01 >> AM >> The warming of the Earth has cooled the yields of corn and wheat in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 5/5/2011 4:20 PM, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym> wrote:<br />
> On 5/5/2011 12:42 PM, Roger Coppock wrote:<br />
>> Report: Global warming already crimping crop production, pushing<br />
>> prices higher<br />
>> By Brian Vastag and Juliet Eilperin, Updated: Thursday, May 5, 11:01<br />
>> AM<br />
>> The warming of the Earth has cooled the yields of corn and wheat in<br />
>> much of the world, a new study finds.<br />
>><br />
>> Although agricultural advances have pushed global production of staple<br />
>> crops skyward, hotter temperatures in Russia, China, Mexico and<br />
>> elsewhere have stunted that growth and contributed to the long-term<br />
>> rise in food prices, concludes the analysis published Thursday in the<br />
>> journal Science.<br />
>><br />
>> “This is tens of billions of dollars a year in lost [agricultural]<br />
>> productivity because of warming,” said David Lobell, an Earth<br />
>> scientist at Stanford University and an author on the report.<br />
>><br />
>> Three decades of global warming crimped worldwide yields of corn by<br />
>> some 5.5 percent and wheat by some 3.8 percent compared with what<br />
>> would have been produced had world temperatures remained stable, the<br />
>> report says.<br />
><br />
> You can&#8217;t have it both ways.  The increases in crop productivity over<br />
> the past 150 years is DIRECTLY ATTRIBUTABLE to the widespread use of<br />
> petrofuels/petrochemicals.<br />
><br />
> So, if you are now complaining that crops are being affected by warming,<br />
> then the alternative is to go back to the crop productivity of 1850.<br />
> I&#8217;ll tell you right now, unequivocally, that the loss of productivity<br />
> will be a LOT MORE than 5%.<br />
><br />
> So, take your pick: 5% or 75% loss.</p>
<p>Commercial growing moving inside and away from Global climate.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thegreencenter.net/rr/rr005.htm" >http://www.thegreencenter.net/rr/rr005.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/05/05/global-warming-already-crimping-crop-production/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Ron Paul turning wimpy on illegal immigration?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/30/is-ron-paul-turning-wimpy-on-illegal-immigration/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/30/is-ron-paul-turning-wimpy-on-illegal-immigration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 18:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=19994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[> > > &#8220;Iconoclast&#8221; wrote in message > news:ce12eaa8-4bf4-4fa8-89ae-7b600af2d169 @&#038;*$?%t19g2000prd.googlegroups.com&#8230; > > On Apr 30, 9:05 am, &#8220; J&#038;*$?%a&#8221; wrote: >> Does anyone have a solution to the illegal immigration problem? If you >> believe there is a solution, what is the solution? >> And give America back to Americans Reducing regulations is primary since [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>><br />
><br />
> &#8220;Iconoclast&#8221;  wrote in message<br />
> news:ce12eaa8-4bf4-4fa8-89ae-7b600af2d169<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>t19g2000prd.googlegroups.com&#8230;<br />
><br />
> On Apr 30, 9:05 am, &#8220;<acronym title="Jerry Okamura"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> J&*$?%a</span></acronym>&#8221; <okamuraj ...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:<br />
>> Does anyone have a solution to the illegal immigration problem?  If you<br />
>> believe there is a solution, what is the solution?<br />
>></p>
<p>And give America back to Americans</p>
<p>Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression.</p>
<p>End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
prostitutes when there are so many legal tax paying prostitutes out there?</p>
<p><a href="http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs--crime-usage-falls" >http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs&#8211;crime-usage-falls</a></p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED<br />
money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad. All electronic money leaving the USA would be debited the<br />
Sales tax when the money is sent/spent.</p>
<p>The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drug smuggling less*<br />
*profitable* as would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL<br />
“NEW ITEM” SALES TAX *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE<br />
DRUG DEALERS and illegals by making their tax free money leaving the<br />
country even more valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the RED money<br />
for GREEN money then you would charge the sales tax at that point.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.stansberryresearch.com/pro/1011PSISBBVD/PPSIM280/PR" >http://www.stansberryresearch.com/pro/1011PSISBBVD/PPSIM280/PR</a></p>
<p>Have the States Ratify an amendment withdrawing the 16th amendment&#8230;<br />
Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (Federal sales<br />
tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED TAX* with the same amendment that<br />
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a Federal *NEW ITEM* sales tax.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
*GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add to<br />
the amendment that if congress raises sales tax by 1% they are forced to<br />
cut every single expenditure of the government by 3%.</p>
<p>Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
of our military bases along the southern Border to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the Border patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
Federal trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases.</p>
<p>This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
outside the USA. That will make it harder for smugglers to get money out<br />
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch smugglers. We<br />
are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
borrow like income tax does.</p>
<p>This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less welfare and charge them<br />
tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>Pass an amendment to the constitution that makes all<br />
*laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.</p>
<p>There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. And a<br />
constitutional amendment to limit the Interstate Commerce Clause. The<br />
politicians use that clause to justify all sorts of socialist <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>. The<br />
founding fathers never meant for it to be so broadly applied. Limit it<br />
with an amendment, so government can&#8217;t justify every crazy Socialist<br />
idea by saying its legal under the interstate commerce clause.</p>
<p>Pass another amendment creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP CONGRESS FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING MONEY. The way to limit<br />
some of the Presidents spending is to put an amendment in the<br />
constitution, and limit the Executive branch to 1% of the Nations income<br />
for foreign aid. That should reduce the Presidents buying of other<br />
Nations &#8220;friendship&#8221;.</p>
<p>To quit filling the jails with people over *social taboos* , we need to<br />
take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;social engineer&#8221; the businesses or the<br />
private people by removing the governments use of IRS tax code to<br />
manipulate people. Getting rid of the Income tax and IRS as suggested<br />
above will do that.</p>
<p>Government needs to spend 10% less every year until they meet the<br />
income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
force an across the board spending cap at 20% of GDP and then across the<br />
board cuts on the government spending, to include a law in our TAX<br />
amendment to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
federal sales tax increase would result in automatic spending cuts using<br />
a baseline of 10% taxes.</p>
<p>And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
them fight their own fights. We also need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
committing(fewer laws), we need fewer police and prisons to support&#8230;.<br />
and the above drug and tax plan, will reduce police and prison needs by<br />
at least that 10% that this plan suggested cutting each year.</p>
<p>NO welfare to corporations, and cut welfare to private people by 10%<br />
each year until it is 10% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
in DEEP for a long time.</p>
<p></okamuraj></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/30/is-ron-paul-turning-wimpy-on-illegal-immigration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mexico to sue U.S. gun makers?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/22/mexico-to-sue-u-s-gun-makers/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/22/mexico-to-sue-u-s-gun-makers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 19:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=19722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/22/2011 3:01 PM, Dänk 666 wrote: > On Apr 22, 7:50 am, No Surren&#8230;@never.net wrote: >> FROM CBS NEWS >> >> HEAD: Mexico wants to sue U.S. gun makers >> >> CBS News has learned that the Mexican Government has retained an American law firm to explore filing civil charges against >> U.S. gun [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/22/2011 3:01 PM, Dänk 666 wrote:<br />
> On Apr 22, 7:50 am, No <a href="mailto:Surren...@never.net">Surren&#8230;@never.net</a> wrote:<br />
>> FROM CBS NEWS<br />
>><br />
>> HEAD: Mexico wants to sue U.S. gun makers<br />
>><br />
>> CBS News has learned that the Mexican Government has retained an American law firm to explore filing civil charges against<br />
>> U.S. gun manufacturers and distributors over the flood of guns crossing the border into Mexico.<br />
><br />
> Maybe the U.S. should sue Mexico over the flood of Mexicans crossing<br />
> the border into the USA.<br />
><br />
> One has to wonder how a country could be so awful that its citizens<br />
> risk their lives crossing deadly rivers and deserts trying to escape.</p>
<p>Sue Cuba too, they escape that paradise with full medical care to float<br />
half way to Miami&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/22/mexico-to-sue-u-s-gun-makers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservatives should demand 15% decrease in Defense spending.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/14/conservatives-should-demand-15-decrease-in-defense-spending-4/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/14/conservatives-should-demand-15-decrease-in-defense-spending-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 22:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=19446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/14/2011 8:47 AM, Brent wrote: > On 2011-04-14, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: >> On 4/13/2011 10:20 PM, Brent wrote: >>> On 2011-04-14, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: >>> >>>> Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green >>>> money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and >>>> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/14/2011 8:47 AM, Brent wrote:<br />
> On 2011-04-14, Beam Me Up Scotty
<then -Destroy-Everything<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote:<br />
>> On 4/13/2011 10:20 PM, Brent wrote:<br />
>>> On 2011-04-14, Beam Me Up Scotty </then>
<then -Destroy-Everything<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>>  Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
>>>> money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
>>>> suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED<br />
>>>> money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
>>>> it abroad. All electronic money leaving the USA would be debited the<br />
>>>> Sales tax when the money is sent/spent.<br />
>>><br />
>>> You don&#8217;t want that. Money outside the US is one of the few things<br />
>>> keeping massive inflation away.<br />
>><br />
>> How?<br />
>> I&#8217;m open to learning, I just don&#8217;t see it?<br />
><br />
> If that money were circulating in the USA prices here would be higher.<br />
><br />
>> Drug dealers exporting our dollars doesn&#8217;t seem to be a good economic<br />
>> plan.<br />
><br />
> There isn&#8217;t a fixed amount of dollars. The fed just creates more and<br />
> more and more. They have to go somewhere. If all the dollars in the<br />
> world returned we would actually feel all the inflation.</p>
<p>Maybe the Fed could print out of country money and create world<br />
inflation&#8230;.  rather than printing in-country money and creating<br />
American inflation.</p>
</then>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/14/conservatives-should-demand-15-decrease-in-defense-spending-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservatives should demand 15% decrease in Defense spending.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/14/conservatives-should-demand-15-decrease-in-defense-spending-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/14/conservatives-should-demand-15-decrease-in-defense-spending-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 06:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=19388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/13/2011 10:20 PM, Brent wrote: > On 2011-04-14, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: > >> Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green >> money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and >> suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED >> money [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/13/2011 10:20 PM, Brent wrote:<br />
> On 2011-04-14, Beam Me Up Scotty
<then -Destroy-Everything<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>>  Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
>> money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
>> suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED<br />
>> money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
>> it abroad. All electronic money leaving the USA would be debited the<br />
>> Sales tax when the money is sent/spent.<br />
><br />
> You don&#8217;t want that. Money outside the US is one of the few things<br />
> keeping massive inflation away.</p>
<p>How?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m open to learning, I just don&#8217;t see it?</p>
<p>Drug dealers exporting our dollars doesn&#8217;t seem to be a good economic<br />
plan.  If it is then I should apply for a Government Grant for drug<br />
dealing as a plan for economic stabilization&#8230;..</p>
</then>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/14/conservatives-should-demand-15-decrease-in-defense-spending-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservatives should demand 15% decrease in Defense spending.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/13/conservatives-should-demand-15-decrease-in-defense-spending/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/13/conservatives-should-demand-15-decrease-in-defense-spending/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 01:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=19316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/13/2011 6:18 PM, Robert not Roberto wrote: > &#8220;walt tonne&#8221; wrote in message > news:817b185f-dfe2-4e78-a26d-bda7094b15ce @&#038;*$?%a21g2000prj.googlegroups.com&#8230; >> Current levels of spending are obscene. Almost a billion to date in >> Libya, 54 thousand milititary >> in Germany, 35 thousand in South Korea. Thousands scattered around the >> middle east. >> Bring em&#8217; home, put [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/13/2011 6:18 PM, Robert not Roberto wrote:<br />
> &#8220;walt tonne&#8221; <tonnewalt487 @gmail.com> wrote in message<br />
> news:817b185f-dfe2-4e78-a26d-bda7094b15ce<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>a21g2000prj.googlegroups.com&#8230;<br />
>> Current levels of spending are obscene. Almost a billion to date in<br />
>> Libya, 54 thousand milititary<br />
>> in Germany, 35 thousand in South Korea. Thousands scattered around the<br />
>> middle east.<br />
>> Bring em&#8217; home, put 20,000 on the borders. Cheaper to discharge many<br />
>> and put them on unemployment.<br />
><br />
> I&#8217;m a Conservative and I agree with you.  The Republicans would have a lot<br />
> more credibility if they put everything on the chopping block including<br />
> defense.<br />
><br />
></p>
<p>And give America back to Americans</p>
<p>Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression.</p>
<p>End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
prostitutes when there are so many legal tax paying prostitutes out there?</p>
<p><a href="http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs--crime-usage-falls" >http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs&#8211;crime-usage-falls</a></p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED<br />
money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad. All electronic money leaving the USA would be debited the<br />
Sales tax when the money is sent/spent.</p>
<p>The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drug smuggling less*<br />
*profitable* as would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL<br />
“NEW ITEM” SALES TAX *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE<br />
DRUG DEALERS and illegals by making their tax free money leaving the<br />
country even more valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the RED money<br />
for GREEN money then you would charge the sales tax at that point.</p>
<p>Have the States Ratify an amendment withdrawing the 16th amendment&#8230;<br />
Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (Federal sales<br />
tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED TAX* with the same amendment that<br />
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a Federal *NEW ITEM* sales tax.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
*GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add to<br />
the amendment that if congress raises sales tax by 1% they are forced to<br />
cut every single expenditure of the government by 3%.</p>
<p>Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
of our military bases along the southern Border to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the Border patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
Federal trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases.</p>
<p>This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
outside the USA. That will make it harder for smugglers to get money out<br />
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch smugglers. We<br />
are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
borrow like income tax does.</p>
<p>This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less welfare and charge them<br />
tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>Pass an amendment to the constitution that makes all<br />
*laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.</p>
<p>There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. And a<br />
constitutional amendment to limit the Interstate Commerce Clause. The<br />
politicians use that clause to justify all sorts of socialist <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>. The<br />
founding fathers never meant for it to be so broadly applied. Limit it<br />
with an amendment, so government can&#8217;t justify every crazy Socialist<br />
idea by saying its legal under the interstate commerce clause.</p>
<p>Pass another amendment creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP CONGRESS FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING MONEY. The way to limit<br />
some of the Presidents spending is to put an amendment in the<br />
constitution, and limit the Executive branch to 1% of the Nations income<br />
for foreign aid. That should reduce the Presidents buying of other<br />
Nations &#8220;friendship&#8221;.</p>
<p>To quit filling the jails with people over *social taboos* , we need to<br />
take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;social engineer&#8221; the businesses or the<br />
private people by removing the governments use of IRS tax code to<br />
manipulate people. Getting rid of the Income tax and IRS as suggested<br />
above will do that.</p>
<p>Government needs to spend 10% less every year until they meet the<br />
income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
force an across the board spending cap at 20% of GDP and then across the<br />
board cuts on the government spending, to include a law in our TAX<br />
amendment to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
federal sales tax increase would result in automatic spending cuts using<br />
a baseline of 10% taxes.</p>
<p>And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
them fight their own fights. We also need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
committing(fewer laws), we need fewer police and prisons to support&#8230;.<br />
and the above drug and tax plan, will reduce police and prison needs by<br />
at least that 10% that this plan suggested cutting each year.</p>
<p>NO welfare to corporations, and cut welfare to private people by 10%<br />
each year until it is 10% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
in DEEP for a long time.</p>
<p></tonnewalt487></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/13/conservatives-should-demand-15-decrease-in-defense-spending/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 Things You Need to Know About High Gas Prices and Obama’s Oil P olicy</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/11/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-high-gas-prices-and-obama%e2%80%99s-oil-p-olicy/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/11/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-high-gas-prices-and-obama%e2%80%99s-oil-p-olicy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 20:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=19174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/11/2011 4:14 PM, Igor wrote: > On Apr 9, 7:55 pm, &#8220;Leroy N. Soetoro&#8221; > wrote: >> http://blog.heritage.org/2011/02/23/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-&#8230; >> gas-prices-and-obama%e2%80%99s-oil-policy/ >> >> This week the media s attention is finally focused on oil prices. After >> two years of continually rising consumer gas prices in America, the oil >> futures market has captivated the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/11/2011 4:14 PM, Igor wrote:<br />
> On Apr 9, 7:55 pm, &#8220;Leroy N. Soetoro&#8221; <leroysoet ...@usurper.org><br />
> wrote:<br />
>> <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2011/02/23/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-..." >http://blog.heritage.org/2011/02/23/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-&#8230;</a><br />
>> gas-prices-and-obama%e2%80%99s-oil-policy/<br />
>><br />
>> This week the media s attention is finally focused on oil prices. After<br />
>> two years of continually rising consumer gas prices in America, the oil<br />
>> futures market has captivated the Mideast storyline. And attention is much<br />
>> needed. December 2010 saw the highest gas prices for the month of December<br />
>> in our nation s history. This month, we re setting similar records with<br />
>> the national average of $3.14/gallon fifty cents higher than it was a year<br />
>> ago. If this trend continues, the summer of 2011 will hit consumers much<br />
>> harder than in the summer of 2008 when prices soared above $4/gallon.<br />
>><br />
>> But if you only read, hear or see this week s news reports, you would<br />
>> think that oil and gas prices were doing just fine until the historic<br />
>> events in Egypt, Libya and across the Middle East unfolded this past month<br />
>> and caused spikes in the futures market. Unfortunately, that is not the<br />
>> case. President Obama has been unilaterally taking steps to increase the<br />
>> cost of gasoline for two years. Here are ten things you need to know about<br />
>> gas prices that you may not hear reported elsewhere:<br />
>><br />
>> 1.Gas Prices Are Skyrocketing Under President Obama: The oil futures<br />
>> market is just that, a futures market. The price-per-barrel spikes in oil<br />
>> this week have not affected the domestic market yet. In fact, former Shell<br />
>> Oil President John Hofmeister made the prediction in December 2010 that<br />
>> America would face $5/gallon gasoline by 2012, a full month before the<br />
>> revolution in Egypt began. At the end of President George W. Bush s two<br />
>> terms in office, prices were 9% lower than when he took office (adjusted<br />
>> for inflation). The day before President Obama was inaugurated; the<br />
>> average price of a gallon of gas was $1.83. Today, that average is $3.14.<br />
>><br />
>> 2.President Obama Has Crippled Domestic Oil Exploration: Putting aside<br />
>> calls from some who want to increase domestic exploration to areas in<br />
>> Alaska and elsewhere, President Obama has completely shut down the<br />
>> existing oil drilling infrastructure in the U.S. At least 103 permits are<br />
>> awaiting review by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and<br />
>> Enforcement. The federal government has not approved a single new<br />
>> exploratory drilling plan in the Gulf of Mexico since Obama lifted his<br />
>> deepwater drilling moratorium in October 2010. Obama also reversed an<br />
>> earlier decision by his administration to open access to coastal waters<br />
>> for exploration, instead placing a seven-year ban on drilling in the<br />
>> Atlantic and Pacific Coasts and Eastern Gulf of Mexico as part of the<br />
>> government s 2012-2017 Outer Continental Shelf Program.<br />
>><br />
>> 3.The Obama Permitorium is Costing the Government Much-Needed Revenue: The<br />
>> Gulf accounts for more than 25 percent of domestic oil production. With<br />
>> production in the Gulf expected to drop in 2011 by 220,000 barrels per<br />
>> day, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates the U.S. will<br />
>> suffer $3.7 million in lost revenue per day as a result of lost royalties.<br />
>> If that holds, the federal government would lose more than $1.35 billion<br />
>> from royalty payments, just this year.<br />
>><br />
>> 4.The Obama Administration Has Been Held in Contempt of Court: Federal<br />
>> District Court Judge Martin Feldman held the Obama Interior Department in<br />
>> contempt of court on February 2, 2011, for dismissively ignoring his<br />
>> ruling to cease the drilling moratorium which the judge had previously<br />
>> struck down as arbitrary and capricious. Judge Feldman has since given<br />
>> the Administration 30 days to act on permits it has needlessly and<br />
>> purposefully delayed saying inaction was not a lawful option.<br />
>><br />
>> 5.Jobs Are Being Killed by Obama s Oil Policies: As a direct result of<br />
>> Obama s oil policies, companies that help supply our domestic energy needs<br />
>> are going out of business. Most recently, Houston-based Seahawk Drilling<br />
>> filed for bankruptcy. The Chief Operating Officer of the offshore drilling<br />
>> company, Randy Stilley, stated: The decision by regulators to arbitrarily<br />
>> construct unnecessary barriers to obtaining permits they had traditionally<br />
>> authorized has had an adverse impact not only on Seahawk, but on the<br />
>> sector as a whole.<br />
>><br />
>> 6.And More Jobs Are Being Killed: Vendors, suppliers, even restaurants and<br />
>> retailers are losing ground or going out of business as a result of the<br />
>> economically crippling policies Obama has unilaterally imposed. According<br />
>> to Reuters, many of the thirty-plus deepwater rigs in the Gulf have moved<br />
>> to other markets. Each rig directly employs approximately 200 people, but<br />
>> that doesn t even count the ripple effect across the nation. One industry<br />
>> official told CNBC that the industry was on life support. But President<br />
>> Obama is spending billions to finance offshore jobs in Brazil. The Obama<br />
>> Administration committed at least $2 billion in 2009 towards Petrobras,<br />
>> one of the largest offshore oil drilling companies in the world.<br />
>><br />
>> 7.Decreasing Our Domestic Supply Increases Foreign Dependence: Even Energy<br />
>> Secretary Steven Chu admits that any disruption in the Middle East means<br />
>> a partial disruption in the oil we import. It s a world market and [a<br />
>> disruption] could actually have real harm of the price. If this is the<br />
>> case, then cutting our domestic supply hardly seems like an appropriate<br />
>> response. Rather than face this reality, Secretary Chu ridiculously called<br />
>> for an increase in renewable energy investments, which is a complete non-<br />
>> sequitur.<br />
>><br />
>> 8.Renewable Energy Is Not the Answer to Mideast Turmoil: According to the<br />
>> EIA, petroleum accounts for less than one percent of electricity<br />
>> production. So wind and solar, which do not produce transportation fuel<br />
>> even if Obama s $40,000 Chevy Volt quadruples production, can only replace<br />
>> coal and natural gas, of which America has an abundant supply. As for<br />
>> biomass, over 40 percent of domestic corn consumption goes to ethanol,<br />
>> which provides less than 10 percent of our transportation fuel and causes<br />
>> food prices to increase. Three large production platforms in the Gulf<br />
>> could provide an amount equivalent to all of the biofuels produced in the<br />
>> U.S.<br />
>><br />
>> 9.Regulations and Delays: The Obama EPA has added costly new regulations<br />
>> to refineries in the name of global warming, while the Obama Interior<br />
>> Department issues new rules that make it much harder to develop natural<br />
>> resources on government land. The EPA is also denying approval of the<br />
>> Keystone pipeline which would increase the amount of oil the U.S. receives<br />
>> from our friendly neighbor Canada by over a million barrels per day.<br />
>><br />
>> 10.The Middle East Is Not the Sole Cause of Rising Oil Prices: Global oil<br />
>> prices have been rising steadily for months based on variety of factors<br />
>> including those listed above and as the world economy pulls out of a<br />
>> recession. In fact, Egypt is not a major producer of petroleum, and only<br />
>> 2-3 percent of the world s supply moves through the Suez Canal. Certain<br />
>> spikes are not abnormal and can be more easily weathered with a smarter<br />
>> domestic energy strategy.<br />
>><br />
>> This week, Deputy Energy Secretary Daniel Poneman told Bloomberg<br />
>> Television: We re hoping capacity will be brought to bear so it will<br />
>> continue to support our economic recovery. Mr. Poneman needs to head down<br />
>> his hallway to meet with his boss Secretary Chu and explain how energy<br />
>> prices affect an economic recovery. Because it was Chu who, in the name of<br />
>> environmental radicalism, stated in 2008: Somehow we have to figure out<br />
>> how to boost the price of gasoline to the levels in Europe. It would seem<br />
>> President Obama and Secretary Chu are getting their wish and you are<br />
>> paying for it every day.<br />
>><br />
>> &#8211;<br />
>> Obama&#8217;s black racist USAG appointee.<br />
>><br />
>> Eric Holder, racist black United States Attorney General drops voter<br />
>> intimidation charges against the Black Panthers,  &#8220;You are about to be<br />
>> ruled by the black man, cracker!&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>> Eric Holder, prejudiced black United States Attorney General settles the<br />
>> hate crime debate, &#8220;Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws.&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>> Nancy Pelosi, Democrat criminal, accessory before and after the fact, to<br />
>> former House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles B. Rangel of New<br />
>> York&#8217;s million dollar tax evasion.  On December 3, 2010, Congress voted to<br />
>> censure Rangel for 11 ethics violations.  House Speaker Nancy Pelosi<br />
>> fought removal of Charles B. Rangel from the House Ways and Means<br />
>> Committee.<br />
>><br />
>> Felony President.  18 USC, Sec. 600. Promise of employment or other<br />
>> benefit for political activity<br />
>><br />
>> Obama violated the law by trying to buy Joe Sestak off with a political<br />
>> appointment in exchange for not pursuing an election bid to replace Arlen<br />
>> Specter.  Obama violated the law by trying to buy former Colorado House<br />
>> Speaker Andrew Romanoff off last fall to see if he&#8217;d be interested in an<br />
>> administration job &#8212; instead of running against Sen. Michael Bennet.<br />
>><br />
>> &#8212; <a href="news://freenews.netfront.net/" >news://freenews.netfront.net/</a> &#8211; complaints: <a href="mailto:n...@netfront.net">n&#8230;@netfront.net</a> &#8212;<br />
><br />
> At least Obama HAS an energy policy.  We couldn&#8217;t say the same thing<br />
> about W or Captain Alzheimers.<br />
></p>
<p>Where is the power to make energy policy in the constitution?</p>
<p></leroysoet></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/11/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-high-gas-prices-and-obama%e2%80%99s-oil-p-olicy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The GOP Path to Prosperity (Video)</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/05/the-gop-path-to-prosperity-video/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/05/the-gop-path-to-prosperity-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 18:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=18944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/5/2011 11:23 AM, Seth wrote: > The GOP Path to Prosperity (Video) > > This budget cuts $6.2 trillion in spending from the president&#8217;s budget > over the next 10 years and puts the nation on track to pay off our > national debt. > > And give America back to Americans Reducing regulations [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/5/2011 11:23 AM, Seth wrote:<br />
> The GOP Path to Prosperity (Video)<br />
><br />
> This budget cuts $6.2 trillion in spending from the president&#8217;s budget<br />
> over the next 10 years and puts the nation on track to pay off our<br />
> national debt.<br />
><br />
> <embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Xwv5EbxXSmE&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>And give America back to Americans</p>
<p>Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression.</p>
<p>End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
prostitutes when there are so many legal tax paying prostitutes out there?</p>
<p><a href="http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs--crime-usage-falls" >http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs&#8211;crime-usage-falls</a></p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED<br />
money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad. All electronic money leaving the USA would be debited the<br />
Sales tax when the money is sent/spent.</p>
<p>The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drug smuggling less*<br />
*profitable* as would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL<br />
“NEW ITEM” SALES TAX *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE<br />
DRUG DEALERS and illegals by making their tax free money leaving the<br />
country even more valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the RED money<br />
for GREEN money then you would charge the sales tax at that point.</p>
<p>Have the States Ratify an amendment withdrawing the 16th amendment&#8230;<br />
Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (Federal sales<br />
tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED TAX* with the same amendment that<br />
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a Federal *NEW ITEM* sales tax.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
*GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add to<br />
the amendment that if congress raises sales tax by 1% they are forced to<br />
cut every single expenditure of the government by 3%.</p>
<p>Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
of our military bases along the southern Border to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the Border patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
Federal trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases.</p>
<p>This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
outside the USA. That will make it harder for smugglers to get money out<br />
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch smugglers. We<br />
are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
borrow like income tax does.</p>
<p>This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less welfare and charge them<br />
tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>Pass an amendment to the constitution that makes all<br />
*laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.</p>
<p>There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. And a<br />
constitutional amendment to limit the Interstate Commerce Clause. The<br />
politicians use that clause to justify all sorts of socialist <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>. The<br />
founding fathers never meant for it to be so broadly applied. Limit it<br />
with an amendment, so government can&#8217;t justify every crazy Socialist<br />
idea by saying its legal under the interstate commerce clause.</p>
<p>Pass another amendment creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP CONGRESS FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING MONEY. The way to limit<br />
some of the Presidents spending is to put an amendment in the<br />
constitution, and limit the Executive branch to 1% of the Nations income<br />
for foreign aid. That should reduce the Presidents buying of other<br />
Nations &#8220;friendship&#8221;.</p>
<p>To quit filling the jails with people over *social taboos* , we need to<br />
take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;social engineer&#8221; the businesses or the<br />
private people by removing the governments use of IRS tax code to<br />
manipulate people. Getting rid of the Income tax and IRS as suggested<br />
above will do that.</p>
<p>Government needs to spend 10% less every year until they meet the<br />
income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
force an across the board spending cap at 20% of GDP and then across the<br />
board cuts on the government spending, to include a law in our TAX<br />
amendment to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
federal sales tax increase would result in automatic spending cuts using<br />
a baseline of 10% taxes.</p>
<p>And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
them fight their own fights. We also need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
committing(fewer laws), we need fewer police and prisons to support&#8230;.<br />
and the above drug and tax plan, will reduce police and prison needs by<br />
at least that 10% that this plan suggested cutting each year.</p>
<p>NO welfare to corporations, and cut welfare to private people by 10%<br />
each year until it is 10% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
in DEEP for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/05/the-gop-path-to-prosperity-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama plans to give Guns to Libyan citizens, where are my free government guns?   I can&#8217;t even buy the full auto assault weapons Obama wants to give to our enemies.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/31/obama-plans-to-give-guns-to-libyan-citizens-where-are-my-free-government-guns-i-cant-even-buy-the-full-auto-assault-weapons-obama-wants-to-give-to-our-enemies-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/31/obama-plans-to-give-guns-to-libyan-citizens-where-are-my-free-government-guns-i-cant-even-buy-the-full-auto-assault-weapons-obama-wants-to-give-to-our-enemies-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 14:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OBAMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lamont Cranston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=18609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 3/30/2011 7:50 PM, Lamont Cranston wrote: > On 3/30/2011 6:33 AM, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: >> >> Obama&#8217;s own Attorney General has tried to stop American lawyers and >> Doctors(citizens) from being able to own guns, and NOW Obama wants to >> Give our enemy in Libya(Al`Qaeda) all the guns they need&#8230;.. because [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 3/30/2011 7:50 PM, Lamont Cranston wrote:<br />
> On 3/30/2011 6:33 AM, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:<br />
>><br />
>> Obama&#8217;s own Attorney General has tried to stop American lawyers and<br />
>> Doctors(citizens) from being able to own guns, and NOW Obama wants to<br />
>> Give our enemy in Libya(Al`Qaeda) all the guns they need&#8230;..   because<br />
>> they are Doctors and Lawyers?  What a POS this Whining Socialist<br />
>> President is.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> Is this true hypocrisy or what?<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> Obama trusts Libyans more than he trusts his own American people.  I<br />
>> keep hearing Obama and Hillary and other Leftists say that guns going to<br />
>> Mexico is the Major problem and that he had to stop those guns from<br />
>> crossing the border, because we don&#8217;t know who is getting the guns.<br />
>><br />
>> When Obama ships guns to Libya, our government won&#8217;t know who is getting<br />
>> the guns, they don&#8217;t have a clue who the &#8220;rebels&#8221; are and no clue as to<br />
>> whether these weapons will be shipped to the borders of Israel to be<br />
>> used to KILL innocent Israelis.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> Obama can ship fully automatic assault weapons (Guns) to Libya after he<br />
>> sends me a fully auto assault weapon.   Americans come first, and if<br />
>> protection from government requires guns to stop the governments from<br />
>> killing people, then Americans need more and better guns and we need the<br />
>> guns first/today.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> Several times Obama has said that &#8220;We The People&#8221; need laws and<br />
>> regulations forced on us. Laws that we don&#8217;t want. Pelosi said we will<br />
>> get health care and see that we wanted it after it has been forced on<br />
>> us. If any people need guns to stop their out of control government it<br />
>> is American Citizens.<br />
>><br />
><br />
> More delusional rantings and impotent rage from someone with Obama<br />
> Derangement Syndrome.</p>
<p>Did you have a point regarding Obama&#8217;s hypocrisy? Or are you just<br />
ranting about your lack of ability to defend Obama&#8217;s stupidity?</p>
<p>*OBAMA IS THE HARVARD VILLAGE IDIOT*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/31/obama-plans-to-give-guns-to-libyan-citizens-where-are-my-free-government-guns-i-cant-even-buy-the-full-auto-assault-weapons-obama-wants-to-give-to-our-enemies-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama plans to give Guns to Libyan citizens, where are my free government guns?   I can&#8217;t even buy the full auto assault weapons Obama wants to give to our enemies.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/30/obama-plans-to-give-guns-to-libyan-citizens-where-are-my-free-government-guns-i-cant-even-buy-the-full-auto-assault-weapons-obama-wants-to-give-to-our-enemies/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/30/obama-plans-to-give-guns-to-libyan-citizens-where-are-my-free-government-guns-i-cant-even-buy-the-full-auto-assault-weapons-obama-wants-to-give-to-our-enemies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 13:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=18570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama&#8217;s own Attorney General has tried to stop American lawyers and Doctors(citizens) from being able to own guns, and NOW Obama wants to Give our enemy in Libya(Al`Qaeda) all the guns they need&#8230;.. because they are Doctors and Lawyers? What a POS this Whining Socialist President is. Is this true hypocrisy or what? Obama trusts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama&#8217;s own Attorney General has tried to stop American lawyers and<br />
Doctors(citizens) from being able to own guns, and NOW Obama wants to<br />
Give our enemy in Libya(Al`Qaeda) all the guns they need&#8230;..   because<br />
they are Doctors and Lawyers?  What a POS this Whining Socialist<br />
President is.</p>
<p>Is this true hypocrisy or what?</p>
<p>Obama trusts Libyans more than he trusts his own American people.  I<br />
keep hearing Obama and Hillary and other Leftists say that guns going to<br />
Mexico is the Major problem and that he had to stop those guns from<br />
crossing the border, because we don&#8217;t know who is getting the guns.</p>
<p>When Obama ships guns to Libya, our government won&#8217;t know who is getting<br />
the guns, they don&#8217;t have a clue who the &#8220;rebels&#8221; are and no clue as to<br />
whether these weapons will be shipped to the borders of Israel to be<br />
used to KILL innocent Israelis.</p>
<p>Obama can ship fully automatic assault weapons (Guns) to Libya after he<br />
sends me a fully auto assault weapon.   Americans come first, and if<br />
protection from government requires guns to stop the governments from<br />
killing people, then Americans need more and better guns and we need the<br />
guns first/today.</p>
<p>Several times Obama has said that &#8220;We The People&#8221; need laws and<br />
regulations forced on us. Laws that we don&#8217;t want. Pelosi said we will<br />
get health care and see that we wanted it after it has been forced on<br />
us. If any people need guns to stop their out of control government it<br />
is American Citizens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/30/obama-plans-to-give-guns-to-libyan-citizens-where-are-my-free-government-guns-i-cant-even-buy-the-full-auto-assault-weapons-obama-wants-to-give-to-our-enemies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>more good than bad</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/29/more-good-than-bad/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/29/more-good-than-bad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 14:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Mon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=18500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 3/29/2011 9:05 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Mar 29, 11:21 pm, Art Sowers wrote: >> On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, P. Rajah wrote: >>> On 3/28/2011 9:48 PM, Art Sowers wrote: >> >>>> On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, P. Rajah wrote: >> >>>>> On 3/28/2011 12:40 PM, DMJoshi wrote: >> >>>>>> On Mar [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 3/29/2011 9:05 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:<br />
> On Mar 29, 11:21 pm, Art Sowers <arthu ...@mv.com> wrote:<br />
>> On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, P. Rajah wrote:<br />
>>> On 3/28/2011 9:48 PM, Art Sowers wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>> On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, P. Rajah wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>> On 3/28/2011 12:40 PM, DMJoshi wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> On Mar 26, 9:45 pm, Art Sowers</arthu><arthu ...@mv.com> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Americanism" >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Americanism</a><br />
>><br />
>>>>>>> &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
>>>>>>> (quote from about 1/3 way down):<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>> &#8220;Contemporary regional attitudes<br />
>>>>>>> Results of 2010 BBC World Service poll of<br />
>>>>>>> views in various countries of U.S. influence[46]&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>> Country polled<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>> Positive Negative<br />
>>>>>>> *********************************<br />
>>>>>>> U S A 60% 22%<br />
>>>>>>> *********************************<br />
>>>>>>> Canada 44% 38%<br />
>>>>>>> Cent Amer 64% 24%<br />
>>>>>>> Chile 55% 26%<br />
>>>>>>> Brazil 53% 35%<br />
>>>>>>> Mexico 13% 49%<br />
>>>>>>> Portugal 57% 20%<br />
>>>>>>> Italy 56% 22%<br />
>>>>>>> U K 48% 35%<br />
>>>>>>> France 45% 39%<br />
>>>>>>> Spain 40% 33%<br />
>>>>>>> Germany 39% 47%<br />
>>>>>>> Russia 25% 50%<br />
>>>>>>> Egypt 45% 29%<br />
>>>>>>> Turkey 13% 70%<br />
>>>>>>> Kenya 85% 10%<br />
>>>>>>> Ghana 72% 13%<br />
>>>>>>> Nigeria 64% 32%<br />
>>>>>>> Phil. Isl 82% 8%<br />
>>>>>>> So. Korea 57% 38%<br />
>>>>>>> Thailand 49% 35%<br />
>>>>>>> Azerbaijan 44% 38%<br />
>>>>>>> ********************************<br />
>>>>>>> India 39% 28%<br />
>>>>>>> ********************************<br />
>>>>>>> Australia 37% 38%<br />
>>>>>>> Indonesia 36% 39%<br />
>>>>>>> Japan 34% 18%<br />
>>>>>>> China 29% 44%<br />
>>>>>>> Pakistan 9% 52%<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>> &#8220;A poll conducted in 2010 by the BBC World Service found positive<br />
>>>>>>> views in most countries about the influence of the U.S. for the<br />
>>>>>>> first time since tracking began in 2005. Nineteen countries gave US<br />
>>>>>>> influence positive ratings, while six leaned negative and two were<br />
>>>>>>> divided. 46 per cent of the 27 countries polled viewed US influence<br />
>>>>>>> positively and 34 per cent viewed it negatively.&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>> (FYI, rest of Wiki article had explanations for negative sentiments;<br />
>>>>>>> have<br />
>>>>>>> fun all of you anti-US guys&#8211;especially anti-US Indians [such as<br />
>>>>>>> Joshi]&#8211;<br />
>>>>>>> you can ignore the good side of the story. P.S. India got a more<br />
>>>>>>> negative<br />
>>>>>>> score [28%] than the USA [22%])<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> Do you have figures of US spending how many dollars per person alive<br />
>>>>>> in the region (outside US) today and if people like US proportionate<br />
>>>>>> to dollars spent per person?<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> It might also be relevant to have figures of the dollars spent per US<br />
>>>>>> man or woman getting killed and the man or the woman of the region<br />
>>>>>> getting killed.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> <a href="http://www.vhfcn.org/stat.html" >http://www.vhfcn.org/stat.html</a><br />
>><br />
>>>>>> Says total of 58,148 American got killed.<br />
>>>>>> Of the USD spent how many they come per American killed.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> Any figure about Vietnames killed.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> By the way how come Kenya is much more liked that US is?<br />
>><br />
>>>>> How do you come to that conclusion from the table above, which refers<br />
>>>>> to opinions about the US? Both you and Art Sowers have got it wrong.<br />
>><br />
>>>> I don&#8217;t think I got it wrong. I just, totally, quoted the numbers and<br />
>>>> the text which supported the conclusion that the USA is mostly viewed,<br />
>>>> more often, as more good than bad. I didn&#8217;t interpret anything but<br />
>>>> provided the<br />
>>>> explanation that the wiki entry was on &#8220;Anti-Americanism&#8221; which was<br />
>>>> extensive, but also contained material (what I quoted) as supporting the<br />
>>>> notion that the &#8220;pro-American&#8221; consensus is stronger than<br />
>>>> the &#8220;Anti-American&#8221; consensus, which has the effect of diminishing the<br />
>>>> value and validity of the Anti-American views. However, I acknowledge<br />
>>>> that many things done by the USA will be seen with disaproval by others,<br />
>>>> but then many things done by others were as bad or worse (Hitler,<br />
>>>> Stalin, Hirohito/Tojo).<br />
>><br />
>>> Where you got it wrong was in assuming that the figures you provided(see<br />
>>> above) pertained to the &#8220;likability&#8221; of each country mentioned, whereas in<br />
>>> fact it pertains to the &#8220;views in various countries of U.S. influence&#8221;. That<br />
>>> is, 28% of *Indians* have a negative view of _US influence_, not that 28% of<br />
>>> people see India negatively.<br />
>><br />
>> OK, OK, my mistake.<br />
>><br />
>>   Your remark that &#8220;India got a more negative<br />
>><br />
>>> score [28%] than the USA [22%]&#8221; is not correct<br />
>><br />
>> Yeah, in my comments way at the very end.<br />
>><br />
>>   in the context of the table<br />
>><br />
>>> above. India has a 36% favorable, 31% unfavorable result in the poll I<br />
>>> referred to(see below), compared with a 46% favorable, 34% unfavorable result<br />
>>> for the US, which is still better than India&#8217;s rating. Joshi also interpreted<br />
>>> it wrong, thinking that 85% of those polled thought favorably of Kenya,<br />
>>> rather than that 85% of Kenyans have a favorable view of American influence.<br />
>>> I think it is important to accurately interpret statistics you quote(or refer<br />
>>> to), or you risk being tagged as inept or worse.<br />
>><br />
>> How about focusing on Joshi who ALWAYS tries to spin everything into<br />
>> &#8220;USA=nothing but bad&#8221; and ignores the bad in India?<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>>> Joshi, on the other hand, never wants to talk about anything bad going<br />
>>>> on in India or its history, and always only wants to talk about only bad<br />
>>>> things in US or its history. It is out of 1. fanatical hate, 2.<br />
>>>> neurosis, or 3. both.<br />
>><br />
>>> I agree. I think that, like Kamal, Joshi is nursing a grievance against the<br />
>>> US for some perceived personal injustice.<br />
>><br />
>> Beyond that, lots of people have anti-US feelings for all kinds of<br />
>> credible and rational reasons. eg. Support of Israel which all manner of<br />
>> Arabs, etc., would not like. eg. Some innocent bystander Afghan/<acronym title="Paki"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%i</span></acronym>/etc.,<br />
>> gets shot by accident by US troops and then becomes anti-US for life. And,<br />
>> thus the blame spreads to &#8220;all Americans&#8221; and &#8220;whites,&#8221; etc. If they want<br />
>> to blame my govt or our military, fine. What can I say?<br />
>><br />
>> The whole blame-the-USA (for anything and everything) game by several<br />
>> Indians here (you know who they are) is a joke when the USA really has<br />
>> done more good than bad in the world, and the tons of immigrants walk in<br />
>> either illegally or become illegal by overstay&#8230;.I&#8217;m supposed to avoid<br />
>> being called a racist by being happy about that? Foreigners (those same<br />
>> Indians here on the NGs) are &#8220;entitled&#8221; to any rights here they want but<br />
>> locals are not &#8220;entitled&#8221; to anything? And, they call me a racist because<br />
>> I don&#8217;t agree with that? And, what about all the anti-white-anti-US<br />
>> racist comments from those and other Indians that are easy to find from<br />
>> now going back many years?  Yeah, I don&#8217;t get any arguments from Indians<br />
>> about India belongs to Indians, but a lot of them sure think that the USA<br />
>> belongs to them, too.<br />
>><br />
>> Another question: how come its OK for these same Indians to bash only US<br />
>> history when its easy to find records of wars and injustices carried out<br />
>> in several other Asian countries (eg China/Japan), including Indian<br />
>> history?<br />
>><br />
>> And, just a few days ago there was this dustup over who or what Indians<br />
>> were &#8220;kissing my <acronym title="ass"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> a&*$?%s</span></acronym>.&#8221;  So, what was it: it didn&#8217;t matter if a question<br />
>> was being answered with the right or wrong answer, but whether some or any<br />
>> &#8220;brown guys&#8221; (guess who) were even talking with some &#8220;white guys&#8221; (me)?<br />
>><br />
>> An &#8220;us-them&#8221; relationship? Banerjee might not exactly be a real popular<br />
>> guy around here (for some reasons),<br />
><br />
> What reasons?<br />
><br />
>> but at least (among other<br />
>> characteristics) he is transparent, easy to talk with, and doesn&#8217;t have<br />
>> this blanket 100% anti-white crust (or he wouldn&#8217;t be talking with me). He<br />
>> meets me half-way on a lot of things and I can deal with that.<br />
><br />
> So what if you are mendacious and dishonest about issues you do not<br />
> know, have racist-bigot biases instead?  You are a silly pighead,<br />
> charming at times, very knowledgeable about things you really know,<br />
> and I am rather fond of you for all that.  I cannot thank you enough<br />
> for liking my poetry, and publicly praising it.  Only few name people<br />
> have done that.  Praising anything, is well beyond the scope of the<br />
> generally mean-minded, envious, racist+reverse-racist, casteist,<br />
> regionist, sectarian, corrupt Indian population &#8211; of which the k-<br />
> mqw,cttc and the Aged Pervert Bholu, and of course my dear, dear, dear<br />
> Mr Singh are good examples.  There are many others like that, starting<br />
> with one Debarag Banerjee who wrote me an evil email long long ago.<br />
> The Usenet Rogues&#8217; Gallery of Arindam-haters is crowded with many such<br />
> prize exhibits.  The Jews of Usenet, they alone form a huge and<br />
> impressive gallery.  My goodness, there are so many of them, who do<br />
> not like my completely unimportant and totally harmless self, it is<br />
> funny indeed!<br />
><br />
> On the other hand, I have had the most welcome support from such<br />
> modern giants as Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud, and Mr Malcolm Fabian.  Prof<br />
> Francis Muir, Prof Weinecke and a few others have extended their<br />
> warmth to me at times.  So it has not been a total loss, of course, my<br />
> career &#8211; if you can call it that! &#8211; in Usenet.<br />
>><br />
>> The Joshis and the Maharajs and the Kamals are hopeless and unsalvageable.<br />
><br />
> Kamal is okay.  Joshiji improves greatly upon acquaintance.  I talked<br />
> to him on the phone and we have got on well ever since.  jBm too has<br />
> been behaving himself these days.<br />
>><br />
>> But I also never got credit from any Indians, either, for hiring a Hindu<br />
>> Indian (and hiring both locals and foreigners) back before I retired.<br />
>> Tambi Dude knows this because I sent him a private email, long ago, with a<br />
>> jpeg showing four of us. Still he calls me a racist, while at the same<br />
>> time having and posting various anti-white comments, himself, over the<br />
>> last few years.<br />
>><br />
>> Oh, I get it, since I&#8217;m not happy with the economic damage happening to<br />
>> US society because globalization is causing jobs to leave the US (for<br />
>> cheap currency countries) and immigrants (from countries that can&#8217;t make<br />
>> enough jobs for their own people) flooding into job applicant pools,<br />
>> causing more unemployment and decreasing wages, that means I&#8217;m a racist?<br />
><br />
> Well, I found you a racist as you were unhappy that as a brown person<br />
> I managed to &#8220;escape&#8221; from India to Australia, on terms usually<br />
> reserved for whites who on their part never &#8220;escape&#8221; their respective<br />
> homelands.  This shows how you need to feel superior, by forcing the<br />
> quality of &#8220;escape&#8221; upon anyone leaving India. Indians being brown and<br />
> thus inferior, cannot thus manage their affairs so must need to escape<br />
> &#8211; such is your racist thinking.  You are not unhappy about white women<br />
> taking US jobs for white males, you do not complain about Europeans<br />
> taking jobs from US whites, your hostility is directed purely at non-<br />
> white people everywhere.  Still, as racists go, you are far less<br />
> racist than the true racists, who these days will simply ignore your<br />
> existence, treat you as a non-person, look through you if they at all<br />
> have to look at you, if you are not white enough to their liking. Such<br />
> are their tactics, and since you do not use them, you are either not a<br />
> racist or are good at controlling your racism.<br />
><br />
> Cheers,<br />
> Arindam Banerjee</p>
<p>America is a &#8220;star search&#8221; contestant and we need to be popular and get<br />
votes to be &#8220;good&#8221;?</p>
<p></arthu></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/29/more-good-than-bad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama is confused again.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/27/obama-is-confused-again/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/27/obama-is-confused-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 17:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=18404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama shills say that Qaddafi was going to kill people, Mexico has already had 30,000 atrocities and beheading. Where was Obama then?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama shills say that Qaddafi was going to kill people, Mexico has<br />
already had 30,000 atrocities and beheading.   Where was Obama then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/27/obama-is-confused-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>#Obama has unlimited power to declare war</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/24/obama-has-unlimited-power-to-declare-war-3/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/24/obama-has-unlimited-power-to-declare-war-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=18259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama will now invade Mexico where 30,000 have been killed and beheaded by forces battling for power. Mexican and other insurgents have also crossed our borders&#8230;&#8230; It is a humanitarian nightmare. We&#8217;ll need a UN backed no fly zone to keep out the &#8220;Spring Break&#8221; kids that are funding the insurgents. And we need a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama will now invade Mexico where 30,000 have been killed and beheaded<br />
by forces battling for power. Mexican and other insurgents have also<br />
crossed our borders&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>It is a humanitarian nightmare.  We&#8217;ll need a UN backed no fly zone to<br />
keep out the &#8220;Spring Break&#8221; kids that are funding the insurgents. And we<br />
need a border protection zone in Mexico to keep the Bad guys out&#8230;. &#8220;or<br />
in&#8221; depending on which side of our border you are looking at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/24/obama-has-unlimited-power-to-declare-war-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>#Obama has unlimited power to declare war</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/24/obama-has-unlimited-power-to-declare-war-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/24/obama-has-unlimited-power-to-declare-war-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=18257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama will now invade Mexico where 30,000 have been killed and beheaded by forces battling for power. Mexican and other insurgents have also crossed our borders&#8230;&#8230; It is a humanitarian nightmare. We will need a no fly zone to keep out the &#8220;Spring Break&#8221; kids that are funding the insurgents. And we need a boarder [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama will now invade Mexico where 30,000 have been killed and beheaded<br />
by forces battling for power. Mexican and other insurgents have also<br />
crossed our borders&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>It is a humanitarian nightmare.  We will need a no fly zone to keep out<br />
the &#8220;Spring Break&#8221; kids that are funding the insurgents. And we need a<br />
boarder protection zone in Mexico to keep the Bad guys out&#8230;. &#8220;or in&#8221;<br />
depending on how you look at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/24/obama-has-unlimited-power-to-declare-war-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;That&#8217;s Not Theirs, That&#8217;s A National Resource, It&#8217;s Ours&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/20/thats-not-theirs-thats-a-national-resource-its-ours/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/20/thats-not-theirs-thats-a-national-resource-its-ours/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 17:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=18067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 3/20/2011 11:18 AM, Obveeus wrote: > &#8220;Mason Barge&#8221; wrote: > >> I also think they lowering of taxes on stock dividends below the rate for >> earned income is a&#038;*$?%s-backwards. I can remember when earned income was >> taxed at the lowest rate of any income, which seems to me to reflect the >> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 3/20/2011 11:18 AM, Obveeus wrote:<br />
> &#8220;Mason Barge&#8221; <masonbarge @gmail.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> I also think they lowering of taxes on stock dividends below the rate for<br />
>> earned income is <acronym title="ass"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> a&*$?%s</span></acronym>-backwards.  I can remember when earned income was<br />
>> taxed at the lowest rate of any income, which seems to me to reflect the<br />
>> traditional values of America.<br />
><br />
> I agree, but what I&#8217;d really like to see happen is a &#8216;sales&#8217; tax of sort on<br />
> stocks.  Something akin to the backend load on a mutual fund.  Any time a<br />
> person sells any stock, apply a 5% sales tax.  That would encourage people<br />
> to actually invest in companies rather than &#8216;play the market&#8217; because people<br />
> would be encouraged to actually make long term investments in a company&#8217;s<br />
> future.</p>
<p>The entire tax system should be the same&#8230;.  tax on new Items so that<br />
people use things really want or need them, NOT a tax on working and<br />
earning but on wasting.  A 10% sales tax on new items with a limiting<br />
twist that says any raise in tax will be allowed with a cut across the<br />
board of three times that by all Federal spending.  That way a 1% tax<br />
increase will result in a 3% Federal wide spending cut&#8230;..</p>
<p>33% sales tax increase would mean a 99% spending reduction across the<br />
Board. That would put government out of business.</p>
<p>*And give America back to Americans*</p>
<p>Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression.</p>
<p>End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
prostitutes when there are so many legal tax paying prostitutes out there?</p>
<p><a href="http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs--crime-usage-falls" >http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs&#8211;crime-usage-falls</a></p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED<br />
money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad. All electronic money leaving the USA would be debited the<br />
Sales tax when the money is sent/spent.</p>
<p>The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drug smuggling less*<br />
*profitable* as would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL<br />
“NEW ITEM” SALES TAX *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE<br />
DRUG DEALERS and illegals by making their tax free money leaving the<br />
country even more valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the RED money<br />
for GREEN money then you would charge the sales tax at that point.</p>
<p>Have the States Ratify an amendment withdrawing the 16th amendment&#8230;<br />
Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (Federal sales<br />
tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED TAX* with the same amendment that<br />
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a Federal *NEW ITEM* sales tax.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
*GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add to<br />
the amendment that if congress raises sales tax by 1% they are forced to<br />
cut every single expenditure of the government by 3% evenly.</p>
<p>Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
of our military bases along the southern Border to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the Border patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
Federal trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases.</p>
<p>This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
outside the USA. That will make it harder for smugglers to get money out<br />
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch smugglers. We<br />
are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
borrow like income tax does.</p>
<p>This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less welfare and charge them<br />
tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>Pass an amendment to the constitution that makes all<br />
*laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.</p>
<p>There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. And a<br />
constitutional amendment to limit the Interstate Commerce Clause. The<br />
politicians use that clause to justify all sorts of socialist <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>. The<br />
founding fathers never meant for it to be so broadly applied. Limit it<br />
with an amendment, so government can&#8217;t justify every crazy Socialist<br />
idea by saying its legal under the interstate commerce clause.</p>
<p>Pass another amendment creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP CONGRESS FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING MONEY. The way to limit<br />
some of the Presidents spending is to put an amendment in the<br />
constitution, and limit the Executive branch to 1% of the Nations income<br />
for foreign aid. That should reduce the Presidents buying of other<br />
Nations &#8220;friendship&#8221;.</p>
<p>To quit filling the jails with people over *social taboos* , we need to<br />
take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;social engineer&#8221; the businesses or the<br />
private people by removing the governments use of tax code to manipulate<br />
people. Getting rid of the Income tax and IRS as suggested above will do<br />
that.</p>
<p>Government needs to spend 10% less every year until they meet the<br />
income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
force an across the board spending freeze and then across the board cuts<br />
on the government spending, to do that we have to include a law in our<br />
TAX amendment to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
federal sales tax increase would result in automatic spending cuts using<br />
a baseline of 10% taxes.</p>
<p>And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
them fight their own fights. We also need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
committing(fewer laws), we need fewer police and prisons to support&#8230;.<br />
and the above drug and tax plan, will reduce police and prison needs by<br />
at least that 10% that this plan suggested cutting each year.</p>
<p>NO welfare to corporations, and cut welfare to private people by 10%<br />
each year until it is 10% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
in DEEP for a long time.</p>
<p></masonbarge></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/20/thats-not-theirs-thats-a-national-resource-its-ours/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TSA Scanners Shred Human DNA</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/08/tsa-scanners-shred-human-dna/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/08/tsa-scanners-shred-human-dna/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 18:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=17593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 3/8/2011 9:38 AM, Ron wrote: > On Mar 8, 8:21 am, JLS wrote: >> On Mar 8, 8:47 am, Ron wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Mar 8, 12:56 am, Möebius Pretzel >>> wrote:> Los Alamos Scientist: TSA Scanners Shred Human DNA >> >>>> Boian Alexandrov at the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 3/8/2011 9:38 AM, Ron wrote:<br />
> On Mar 8, 8:21 am, JLS <jls1 ...@bellsouth.net> wrote:<br />
>> On Mar 8, 8:47 am, Ron <roneal1 ...@att.net> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>> On Mar 8, 12:56 am, Möebius Pretzel <mobius_bb_pret ...@yahoo.com><br />
>>> wrote:> Los Alamos Scientist: TSA Scanners Shred Human DNA<br />
>><br />
>>>> Boian Alexandrov at the Center for Nonlinear Studies at Los Alamos<br />
>>>> National Laboratory in New Mexico recently published an abstract with<br />
>>>> colleagues, &#8220;DNA Breathing Dynamics in the Presence of a Terahertz<br />
>>>> Field &#8221; that reveals very disturbing—even shocking—evidence that the<br />
>>>> THz waves generated by TSA scanners is significantly damaging the DNA<br />
>>>> of the people being directed through the machines, and the TSA workers<br />
>>>> that are in close proximity to the scanners throughout their workday.<br />
>><br />
>>>> <a href="http://macedoniaonline.eu/content/view/17090/56/" >http://macedoniaonline.eu/content/view/17090/56/</a><br />
>><br />
>>> .<br />
>>> .<br />
>>> From your own cite:<br />
>><br />
>>> &#8220;Some studies have shown that THZ can cause great genetic harm, while<br />
>>> other similar studies have shown NO SUCH EVIDENCE of deleterious<br />
>>> affects.&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>>> Which one do you want to believe?<br />
>><br />
>>> RO<br />
>><br />
>> It would probably be better to err on the side of caution, don&#8217;t you<br />
>> think?  Even for the safety of the obnoxious jerks who work for TSA.<br />
>> If there&#8217;s DNA damage, official research should give us definitive<br />
>> answers.<br />
>><br />
>> When the new invention called the X-ray machine was first put into<br />
>> use, people around the X-rays began to disintegrate and die early.<br />
>> I remember when kids could go into shoe stores and fluoroscope their<br />
>> feet and see the bones in their feet and toes through their shoes.  I<br />
>> wonder why they took those goddamn machines out of those shoe stores?<br />
>> Don&#8217;t you?<br />
>><br />
>> Why can&#8217;t we still use DDT to kill mosquitos and houseflies and<br />
>> chlorinated hydrocarbons like chlordane to kill termite larvae around<br />
>> our homes?  Why is that?<br />
> .<br />
> .<br />
> Yes, I remember the X-Ray machines in shoe stores.  Yes, I remember<br />
> the environmental damage done by DDT.  Those are PROVEN hazards.<br />
><br />
> My objection is the DEFINITIVE statement made by Moebius in his<br />
> Subject Line.  It may seem picayunish, but I don&#8217;t believe in a<br />
> Chicken Little approach to warning the public of possible dangers.</p>
<p>Global Warming will create human strife, seas will rise and polar bears<br />
will go extinct&#8230;..</p>
<p>> The addition of one word in Moebuis&#8217; Subject Line would be far more<br />
> acceptible: Do TSA Scanners Shred Human DNA?<br />
><br />
> RO</p>
<p></mobius_bb_pret></roneal1></jls1></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/03/08/tsa-scanners-shred-human-dna/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Such economic illiteracy</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/28/such-economic-illiteracy/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/28/such-economic-illiteracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=17268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 2/28/2011 10:13 AM, Colonel Kurtz wrote: > On 27-Feb-2011, No Surrender @&#038;*$?%never.net wrote: > >> FROM AMERICAN THINKER >> >> HEAD: Raising taxes will create jobs: AFL-CIO chief >> >> SUB-HEAD: Such economic illiteracy is unusual, even for a labor union >> chief: >> By Rick Moran >> >> >> What&#8217;s the best way [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 2/28/2011 10:13 AM, Colonel Kurtz wrote:<br />
> On 27-Feb-2011, No <a href="mailto:Surrender<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>never.net">Surrender<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>never.net</a> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> FROM AMERICAN THINKER<br />
>><br />
>> HEAD: Raising taxes will create jobs: AFL-CIO chief<br />
>><br />
>> SUB-HEAD: Such economic illiteracy is unusual, even for a labor union<br />
>> chief:<br />
>> By Rick Moran<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> What&#8217;s the best way to get Americans back to work?</p>
<p>*HOW TO ALLOW AMERICA TO SURVIVE*<br />
And give America back to Americans</p>
<p>Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression.</p>
<p>End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
prostitutes when there are so many legal tax paying prostitutes out there?</p>
<p><a href="http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs--crime-usage-falls" >http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs&#8211;crime-usage-falls</a></p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED<br />
money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad. All electronic money leaving the USA would be debited the<br />
Sales tax when the money is sent/spent.</p>
<p>The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drug smuggling less*<br />
*profitable* as would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL<br />
“NEW ITEM” SALES TAX *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE<br />
DRUG DEALERS and illegals by making their tax free money leaving the<br />
country even more valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the RED money<br />
for GREEN money then you would charge the sales tax at that point.</p>
<p>Have the States Ratify an amendment withdrawing the 16th amendment&#8230;<br />
Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (Federal sales<br />
tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED TAX* with the same amendment that<br />
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a Federal *NEW ITEM* sales tax.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
*GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add to<br />
the amendment that if congress raises sales tax by 1% they are forced to<br />
cut every single expenditure of the government by 3%.</p>
<p>Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
of our military bases along the southern Border to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the Border patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
Federal trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases.</p>
<p>This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
outside the USA. That will make it harder for smugglers to get money out<br />
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch smugglers. We<br />
are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
borrow like income tax does.</p>
<p>This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less welfare and charge them<br />
tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>Pass an amendment to the constitution that makes all<br />
*laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.</p>
<p>There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. And a<br />
constitutional amendment to limit the Interstate Commerce Clause. The<br />
politicians use that clause to justify all sorts of socialist <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>. The<br />
founding fathers never meant for it to be so broadly applied. Limit it<br />
with an amendment, so government can&#8217;t justify every crazy Socialist<br />
idea by saying its legal under the interstate commerce clause.</p>
<p>Pass another amendment creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP CONGRESS FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING MONEY. The way to limit<br />
some of the Presidents spending is to put an amendment in the<br />
constitution, and limit the Executive branch to 1% of the Nations income<br />
for foreign aid. That should reduce the Presidents buying of other<br />
Nations &#8220;friendship&#8221;.</p>
<p>To quit filling the jails with people over *social taboos* , we need to<br />
take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;social engineer&#8221; the businesses or the<br />
private people by removing the governments use of tax code to manipulate<br />
people. Getting rid of the Income tax and IRS as suggested above will do<br />
that.</p>
<p>Government needs to spend 10% less every year until they meet the<br />
income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
force an across the board spending freeze and then across the board cuts<br />
on the government spending, to do that we have to include a law in our<br />
TAX amendment to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
federal sales tax increase would result in automatic spending cuts using<br />
a baseline of 10% taxes.</p>
<p>And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
them fight their own fights. We also need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
committing(fewer laws), we need fewer police and prisons to support&#8230;.<br />
and the above drug and tax plan, will reduce police and prison needs by<br />
at least that 10% that this plan suggested cutting each year.</p>
<p>NO welfare to corporations, and cut welfare to private people by 10%<br />
each year until it is 10% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
in DEEP for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/28/such-economic-illiteracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rethugs to terminate both PBS &amp; NPR. Fat chance</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/15/rethugs-to-terminate-both-pbs-npr-fat-chance-4/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/15/rethugs-to-terminate-both-pbs-npr-fat-chance-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=16908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 2/15/2011 9:56 AM, Curly Surmudgeon wrote: > On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:03:15 -0500, &#8220;Scout&#8221; > wrote: > >> However, you have my attention, so tell me what programs YOU think we >> should be cutting to save money, and they can not be anything that helps >> regular middle class and poor Americans. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 2/15/2011 9:56 AM, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:<br />
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:03:15 -0500, &#8220;Scout&#8221;<br />
> <me4guns @verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> However, you have my attention, so tell me what programs YOU think we<br />
>> should be cutting to save money, and they can not be anything that helps<br />
>> regular middle class and poor Americans.<br />
><br />
> &#8211; Abolish foreign aid.<br />
> &#8211; Cut military spending 15% per year for eight years.<br />
> &#8211; Abolish progressive taxation.<br />
> &#8211; Abolish tax incentives, deductions, exemptions, exclusions and credits.<br />
> &#8211; Abolish farm subsidies &#038; raise tariffs.<br />
> &#8211; Abolish NAFTA and GATT &#038; raise tariffs.<br />
> &#8211; Close most foreign military bases.<br />
> &#8211; Halt the use of our military to enforce failed foreign diplomacy.<br />
> &#8211; Leave Iraq yesterday.<br />
> &#8211; Leave Afghanistan the day before that.<br />
><br />
> for starters&#8230;<br />
><br />
Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression.</p>
<p>End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
prostitutes when there are so many legal tax paying prostitutes out there?</p>
<p><a href="http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs--crime-usage-falls" >http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs&#8211;crime-usage-falls</a></p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED<br />
money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad. All electronic money leaving the USA would be debited the<br />
Sales tax when the money is sent/spent.</p>
<p>The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drug smuggling less*<br />
*profitable* as would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL<br />
“NEW ITEM” SALES TAX *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE<br />
DRUG DEALERS and illegals by making their tax free money leaving the<br />
country even more valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the RED money<br />
for GREEN money then you would charge the sales tax at that point.</p>
<p>Have the States Ratify an amendment withdrawing the 16th amendment&#8230;<br />
Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (Federal sales<br />
tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED TAX* with the same amendment that<br />
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a Federal *NEW ITEM* sales tax.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
*GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add to<br />
the amendment that if congress raises sales tax by 1% they are forced to<br />
cut every single expenditure of the government by 3%.</p>
<p>Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
of our military bases along the southern Border to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the Border patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
Federal trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases.</p>
<p>This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
outside the USA. That will make it harder for smugglers to get money out<br />
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch smugglers. We<br />
are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
borrow like income tax does.</p>
<p>This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less welfare and charge them<br />
tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>Pass an amendment to the constitution that makes all<br />
*laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.</p>
<p>There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. And a<br />
constitutional amendment to limit the Interstate Commerce Clause. The<br />
politicians use that clause to justify all sorts of socialist <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>. The<br />
founding fathers never meant for it to be so broadly applied. Limit it<br />
with an amendment, so government can&#8217;t justify every crazy Socialist<br />
idea by saying its legal under the interstate commerce clause.</p>
<p>Pass another amendment creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP CONGRESS FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING MONEY. The way to limit<br />
some of the Presidents spending is to put an amendment in the<br />
constitution, and limit the Executive branch to 1% of the Nations income<br />
for foreign aid. That should reduce the Presidents buying of other<br />
Nations &#8220;friendship&#8221;.</p>
<p>To quit filling the jails with people over *social taboos* , we need to<br />
take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;social engineer&#8221; the businesses or the<br />
private people by removing the governments use of tax code to manipulate<br />
people. Getting rid of the Income tax and IRS as suggested above will do<br />
that.</p>
<p>Government needs to spend 10% less every year until they meet the<br />
income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
force an across the board spending freeze and then across the board cuts<br />
on the government spending, to do that we have to include a law in our<br />
TAX amendment to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
federal sales tax increase would result in automatic spending cuts using<br />
a baseline of 10% taxes.</p>
<p>And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
them fight their own fights. We also need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
committing(fewer laws), we need fewer police and prisons to support&#8230;.<br />
and the above drug and tax plan, will reduce police and prison needs by<br />
at least that 10% that this plan suggested cutting each year.</p>
<p>NO welfare to corporations, and cut welfare to WE THE PEOPLE by 10%<br />
each year until it is 10% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
in DEEP for a long time.</p>
<p></me4guns></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/15/rethugs-to-terminate-both-pbs-npr-fat-chance-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3rd world country(mexico), is no longer willing to bail out 3rd world state texas:)Mexico Takes Back Offer To Provide Electricity During Crisis:maybe texas should gasp, re-regulate:)</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/07/3rd-world-countrymexico-is-no-longer-willing-to-bail-out-3rd-world-state-texasmexico-takes-back-offer-to-provide-electricity-during-crisismaybe-texas-should-gasp-re-regulate/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/07/3rd-world-countrymexico-is-no-longer-willing-to-bail-out-3rd-world-state-texasmexico-takes-back-offer-to-provide-electricity-during-crisismaybe-texas-should-gasp-re-regulate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 17:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=16661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 2/7/2011 12:05 AM, Nickname unavailable wrote: > 3rd world country(mexico), is no longer willing to bail out 3rd world > state texas:)Mexico Takes Back Offer To Provide Electricity During > Crisis:maybe texas should gasp, re-regulate Texas should ignore the Federal Government and produce more electricity. There is NO Constitutional power over energy&#8230;. so Texas [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 2/7/2011 12:05 AM, Nickname unavailable wrote:<br />
> 3rd world country(mexico), is no longer willing to bail out 3rd world<br />
> state texas:)Mexico Takes Back Offer To Provide Electricity During<br />
> Crisis:maybe texas should gasp, re-regulate</p>
<p>Texas should ignore the Federal Government and produce more electricity.</p>
<p>There is NO Constitutional power over energy&#8230;.   so Texas should<br />
ignore the unconstitutional laws written by the Federal Congress on what<br />
they have no power to write laws on.</p>
<p>But then Texas probably voted with the rest of the Leftists to ignore<br />
the constitution and write laws on energy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/07/3rd-world-countrymexico-is-no-longer-willing-to-bail-out-3rd-world-state-texasmexico-takes-back-offer-to-provide-electricity-during-crisismaybe-texas-should-gasp-re-regulate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Failed Right Wing Red State TexASS Suffers Rolling Blackouts, Buys Electricity From Mexico &#8211; Another Failure Of Privatization</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/03/failed-right-wing-red-state-texass-suffers-rolling-blackouts-buys-electricity-from-mexico-another-failure-of-privatization/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/03/failed-right-wing-red-state-texass-suffers-rolling-blackouts-buys-electricity-from-mexico-another-failure-of-privatization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 19:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=16582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 2/3/2011 2:10 PM, The Denier wrote: > The only thing left is for Fascist Governor Rick Perry to resign. > > Rolling Blackouts Force Texas To Import Power From Mexico &#8230;.build a NUCLEAR power plant. *Obama&#8217;s wind power has failed*]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 2/3/2011 2:10 PM, The Denier wrote:<br />
> The only thing left is for Fascist Governor Rick Perry to resign.<br />
><br />
> Rolling Blackouts Force Texas To Import Power From Mexico</p>
<p>&#8230;.build a NUCLEAR power plant.  *Obama&#8217;s wind power has failed*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/02/03/failed-right-wing-red-state-texass-suffers-rolling-blackouts-buys-electricity-from-mexico-another-failure-of-privatization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/01/18/the-united-states-shall-guarantee-to-every-state-in-this-union/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/01/18/the-united-states-shall-guarantee-to-every-state-in-this-union/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 21:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=15936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/18/2011 4:00 PM, D. Stussy wrote: > &#8220;Strabo&#8221; wrote in message > news:bf6Zo.49055$Am1.266 @&#038;*$?%newsfe07.iad&#8230; >> Article IV >> >> Section 4. The United States shall guarantee to every state in this >> union a republican form of government, and shall protect each of them >> against invasion; and on application of the legislature, or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/18/2011 4:00 PM, D. Stussy wrote:<br />
> &#8220;Strabo&#8221; <strabo @flashlight.net> wrote in message<br />
> news:bf6Zo.49055$Am1.266<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>newsfe07.iad&#8230;<br />
>> Article IV<br />
>><br />
>> Section 4. The United States shall guarantee to every state in this<br />
>> union a republican form of government, and shall protect each of them<br />
>> against invasion; and on application of the legislature, or of the<br />
>> executive (when the legislature cannot be convened) against domestic<br />
>> violence.<br />
><br />
> FAIL &#8211; Ask Arizona &#8211; re: invasion.</p>
<p>That is why Arizona can start to fight a war against Mexico or to secede<br />
from this United States.  Because Obama has Failed to fulfill his and<br />
our obligation to Arizona.</p>
<p></strabo></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/01/18/the-united-states-shall-guarantee-to-every-state-in-this-union/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DC Ranked Worst Place for Small Business in 2010</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/01/06/dc-ranked-worst-place-for-small-business-in-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/01/06/dc-ranked-worst-place-for-small-business-in-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=15428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At Capitol Hill Bikes in Washington, D.C., store-owner Denise D’Amour, 56, wanted her customers to be able to fuel up with healthy snacks like energy bars while perusing the shop. When D’Amour was slapped with a $2,000 fine from the city for selling food items without an official food license, she said she was disappointed, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At Capitol Hill Bikes in Washington, D.C., store-owner Denise D’Amour,<br />
56, wanted her customers to be able to fuel up with healthy snacks like<br />
energy bars while perusing the shop. When D’Amour was slapped with a<br />
$2,000 fine from the city for selling food items without an official<br />
food license, she said she was disappointed, but not surprised.</p>
<p>“It seems the city has a ‘Gotcha’ mentality, instead of trying to help<br />
small businesses,” D’Amour said. “Had I known, if they had come to me<br />
and told me, that would have been one thing. It’s been the biggest<br />
challenge for me.”</p>
<p>The frustrations D’Amour feels as a small business owner are echoed in<br />
this year’s Small Business &#038; Entrepreneurship Council’s “Small Business<br />
Survival Index 2010,” which ranked the District of Columbia as the<br />
least-friendly policy environment for entrepreneurs to launch their<br />
businesses. The index ranks locations by measuring their costs and<br />
burdens of government on small businesses, as well as policies that<br />
either enable or deter growth. The factors included in the index are:<br />
taxes, regulatory costs, government spending, property rights,<br />
health-care policies and energy costs, among others. The council also<br />
throughout the year releases a Health Care Policy Cost Index, Business<br />
Tax Index and Energy Cost Index, all of which spin off of the Survival<br />
Index.</p>
<p>Much of the activity that has occurred at the state level affecting D.C.<br />
small businesses and their owners in 2010 has not been in their favor,<br />
according to Raymond Keating, the SBE Council’s chief economist and<br />
study author.</p>
<p>“The policies were just not pro-small business,” Keating said. “State<br />
legislatures raised taxes to deal with their debt… so much happened at<br />
the state level, and unfortunately most of it was negative.”<br />
&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>Give America back to Americans</p>
<p>Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression.</p>
<p>End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
prostitutes when there are so many legal tax paying prostitutes out there?<br />
<a href="http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs--crime-usage-falls" >http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs&#8211;crime-usage-falls</a></p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED<br />
money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad. All electronic money leaving the USA would be debited the<br />
Sales tax when the money is sent/spent.</p>
<p>The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drug smuggling less*<br />
*profitable* as would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL<br />
“NEW ITEM” SALES TAX *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE<br />
DRUG DEALERS and illegals by making their tax free money leaving the<br />
country even more valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the RED money<br />
for GREEN money then you would charge the sales tax at that point.</p>
<p>Have the States Ratify an amendment withdrawing the 16th amendment&#8230;<br />
Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (Federal sales<br />
tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED TAX* with the same amendment that<br />
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a Federal *NEW ITEM* sales tax.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
*GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add to<br />
the amendment that if congress raises tax by 1% they are forced to cut<br />
every single expenditure of the government by 3%.</p>
<p>Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
of our military bases along the southern Border to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the Border patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
Federal trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases.</p>
<p>This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
outside the USA. That will make it harder for smugglers to get money out<br />
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch smugglers. We<br />
are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
borrow like income tax does.</p>
<p>This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less welfare and charge them<br />
tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>Pass an amendment to the constitution that makes all<br />
*laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.</p>
<p>There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. And a<br />
constitutional amendment to limit the Interstate Commerce Clause. The<br />
politicians use that clause to justify all sorts of socialist <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>. The<br />
founding fathers never meant for it to be so broadly applied. Limit it<br />
with an amendment, so government can&#8217;t justify every crazy idea by<br />
saying its legal under the interstate commerce clause.</p>
<p>Pass another amendment creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP CONGRESS FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING MONEY.</p>
<p>To quit filling the jails with people over *social taboos* , we<br />
need to take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;social engineer&#8221; businesses or<br />
private people by removing the governments use of tax code to manipulate<br />
people.</p>
<p>Government needs to spend 10% less every year until they meet the<br />
income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
force an across the board spending freeze and then across the board cuts<br />
on the government spending, to do that we have to include a law in our<br />
TAX amendment to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
federal sales tax increase would result in automatic spending cuts using<br />
a baseline of 10% taxes.</p>
<p>And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
them fight their own fights. We also need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
committing, we need fewer police and prisons to support&#8230;. the above<br />
drug and tax plan, will reduce police and prison needs by at least that<br />
10% that this plan suggested cutting each year.</p>
<p>NO welfare to corporations, and cut welfare to private people by 10%<br />
each year until it is 10% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
in DEEP for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/01/06/dc-ranked-worst-place-for-small-business-in-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coming Political Upheaval</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/01/05/coming-political-upheaval/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/01/05/coming-political-upheaval/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 04:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=15422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/5/2011 7:44 PM, ray wrote: > In article > .example.com>, > China Blue Ribbon wrote: > >> In article , ray wrote: >> >>> The first step is to repeal Commie Care which will likely get stopped by >>> the Democrat Senate. Next they will work for weeks on end defunding the >>> various [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/5/2011 7:44 PM, ray wrote:<br />
> In article<br />
> <chine .bleu-B742F6.21455504012011<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>reserved-multicast-range-not-delegated<br />
> .example.com>,<br />
>  China Blue Ribbon </chine><chine .bleu<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>yahoo.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> In article <ig0erv01vu3 @news6.newsguy.com>, ray <xxxrayted @aol.com> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>> The first step is to repeal Commie Care which will likely get stopped by<br />
>>> the Democrat Senate.  Next they will work for weeks on end defunding the<br />
>>> various parts of this monstrosity to weaken it as much as possible and<br />
>>> making it irrelevant.<br />
>><br />
>> How will that save enough money not to raise the debt ceiling?<br />
><br />
> It won&#8217;t, but it&#8217;s the right direction and they have the right idea.<br />
> Plus, states are arming themselves with new laws and regulations to stop<br />
> Commie Care from coming to their state.  Lawsuits and measures cost<br />
> those states millions.  I know the Democrats could care less as long as<br />
> they can push their agenda, but this is one time they can back off and<br />
> save these states a ton of time and money.  When the people speak, it&#8217;s<br />
> wise for the politicians to listen.<br />
><br />
Give America back to Americans</p>
<p>Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression.</p>
<p>End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
prostitutes when there are so many legal tax paying prostitutes out there?<br />
<a href="http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs--crime-usage-falls" >http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs&#8211;crime-usage-falls</a></p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED<br />
money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad. All electronic money leaving the USA would be debited the<br />
Sales tax when the money is sent/spent.</p>
<p>The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drug smuggling less*<br />
*profitable* as would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL<br />
“NEW ITEM” SALES TAX *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE<br />
DRUG DEALERS and illegals by making their tax free money leaving the<br />
country even more valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the RED money<br />
for GREEN money then you would charge the sales tax at that point.</p>
<p>Have the States Ratify an amendment withdrawing the 16th amendment&#8230;<br />
Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (Federal sales<br />
tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED TAX* with the same amendment that<br />
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a Federal *NEW ITEM* sales tax.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
*GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add to<br />
the amendment that if congress raises tax by 1% they are forced to cut<br />
every single expenditure of the government by 3%.</p>
<p>Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
of our military bases along the southern Border to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the Border patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
Federal trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases.</p>
<p>This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
outside the USA. That will make it harder for smugglers to get money out<br />
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch smugglers. We<br />
are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
borrow like income tax does.</p>
<p>This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less welfare and charge them<br />
tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>Pass an amendment to the constitution that makes all<br />
*laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.</p>
<p>There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. And a<br />
constitutional amendment to limit the Interstate Commerce Clause. The<br />
politicians use that clause to justify all sorts of socialist <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>. The<br />
founding fathers never meant for it to be so broadly applied. Limit it<br />
with an amendment, so government can&#8217;t justify every crazy idea by<br />
saying its legal under the interstate commerce clause.</p>
<p>Pass another amendment creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP CONGRESS FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING MONEY.</p>
<p>To quit filling the jails with people over *social taboos* , we<br />
need to take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;social engineer&#8221; businesses or<br />
private people by removing the governments use of tax code to manipulate<br />
people.</p>
<p>Government needs to spend 10% less every year until they meet the<br />
income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
force an across the board spending freeze and then across the board cuts<br />
on the government spending, to do that we have to include a law in our<br />
TAX amendment to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
federal sales tax increase would result in automatic spending cuts using<br />
a baseline of 10% taxes.</p>
<p>And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
them fight their own fights. We also need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
committing, we need fewer police and prisons to support&#8230;. the above<br />
drug and tax plan, will reduce police and prison needs by at least that<br />
10% that this plan suggested cutting each year.</p>
<p>NO welfare to corporations, and cut welfare to private people by 10%<br />
each year until it is 10% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
in DEEP for a long time.</p>
<p></xxxrayted></ig0erv01vu3></chine></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/01/05/coming-political-upheaval/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quotations, Political, 2010</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/12/22/quotations-political-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/12/22/quotations-political-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 20:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=14884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 12/22/2010 12:17 PM, Chomp Noamsky wrote: > > > &#8220;Curly Surmudgeon&#8221; wrote in message > news:ies5rl$mu$46 @&#038;*$?%news.eternal-september.org&#8230; >> &#8220;The ocean will take care of this on its own if it was left alone and >> left out there. It&#8217;s natural. It&#8217;s as natural as the ocean water is.&#8221; >> —Rush Limbaugh, on the oil [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 12/22/2010 12:17 PM, Chomp Noamsky wrote:<br />
><br />
><br />
> &#8220;Curly Surmudgeon&#8221; <curlysurmudgeon @live.com> wrote in message<br />
> news:ies5rl$mu$46<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>news.eternal-september.org&#8230;<br />
>> &#8220;The ocean will take care of this on its own if it was left alone and<br />
>> left out there. It&#8217;s natural. It&#8217;s as natural as the ocean water is.&#8221;<br />
>> —Rush Limbaugh, on the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, May 3, 2010<br />
>><br />
>><br />
><br />
> You don&#8217;t hear too much about the spill these days. Ever wonder why?</p>
<p>Because Obama is sucking up the oil with a straw?</p>
<p></curlysurmudgeon></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/12/22/quotations-political-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boehner sobs like a wee pusscake on national TV</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/12/17/boehner-sobs-like-a-wee-pusscake-on-national-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/12/17/boehner-sobs-like-a-wee-pusscake-on-national-tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 21:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Tue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=14706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 12/14/2010 11:17 AM, Yup wrote: > On Dec 14, 10:13 am, Lifsabsurd wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 05:43:59 -0800 (PST), I&#8217;mabsurd wrote: >>>> &#8230; beg or try to steal &#8230; >> >>> Pay off your illegal invasions and then get back to us on that. >> >> Invasions? Like the one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 12/14/2010 11:17 AM, Yup wrote:<br />
> On Dec 14, 10:13 am, Lifsabsurd
<lifsabs ...@charter.net> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>> On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 05:43:59 -0800 (PST), I&#8217;mabsurd </lifsabs>
<lifsabs ...@charter.net> wrote:<br />
>>>> &#8230; beg or try to steal &#8230;<br />
>><br />
>>> Pay off your illegal invasions and then get back to us on that.<br />
>><br />
>> Invasions?  Like the one in Afghanistan that your <acronym title="asshole"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> a&*$?%e</span></acronym>, Obooboo, is<br />
>> continuing to prosecute?  Bush had the sense to move the fighting to<br />
>> Iraq, where he won.  Obooboo and Democrats are stupidly prosecuting a<br />
>> war where it is very unlikely we can ever win.  Obooboo and Democrats<br />
>> said that was the good war.  Then Obooboo said he was going to get us<br />
>> out of there.  You motherfuckers don&#8217;t know which end <acronym title="shit"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> s&*$?%t</span></acronym> is supposed<br />
>> to come out of.<br />
>><br />
>> Furthermore, if you had a brain you would be more concerned with the<br />
>> illegal invasion of this country by Democrat-backed Mexicans.<br />
>><br />
><br />
><br />
> Drug cartels are the real problem dumbass &#8211; and they quickly and<br />
> easily get all their guns thanks to the idiotic right wing gun lobby</p>
<p>SO you hand out condoms because you can&#8217;t stop sex, but you can&#8217;t stop<br />
murder either, why not hand out protection(GUNS) to keep people safe.<br />
Mexico needs to give guns to all their citizens along with the condoms.</p>
<p>That woman in the community meeting used her purse to attack the lunatic<br />
shooter the other day&#8230;.   if she had had a gun it would have been over<br />
in lot less time because &#8220;the purse&#8221; would have had a gun in it.</p>
<p>The Problem in Mexico is that guns are illegal so ONLY DRUG LORDS and<br />
their partners in crime have any power&#8230;.  REMEMBER you Leftists keep<br />
telling us &#8220;POWER COMES FROM THE BARREL OF A GUN&#8221; and the DRUG LORDS<br />
have the power while the people are stripped of their power in Mexico.</p>
<p>So the next time you walk down the street safe from DRUG LORD violence,<br />
thank a rightwinger that has a gun and makes your(the peoples) power<br />
equal to the DRUG LORDS and the CORRUPT GOVERNMENTS.</p>
<p>We all deserve to have equal power.  If the government can fine you for<br />
NOT buying Health Insurance they can also fine you for NOT BUYING A GUN.</p>
<p>We threw out the BUMS last election and we&#8217;ll throw more out the next<br />
election&#8230;.    then we&#8217;ll have the power to fine you for NOT buying a<br />
gun. And it was &#8220;you&#8221; who said the constitution allows for it.</p>
</lifsabs>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/12/17/boehner-sobs-like-a-wee-pusscake-on-national-tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;I THINK I Voted&#8217; Michelle Malkin On Top of the Left&#8217;s Looming Voter Fraud Scandal!</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/10/27/i-think-i-voted-michelle-malkin-on-top-of-the-lefts-looming-voter-fraud-scandal/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/10/27/i-think-i-voted-michelle-malkin-on-top-of-the-lefts-looming-voter-fraud-scandal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 01:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=14361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 10/27/2010 6:40 PM, 5775 Dead, 918 since 1/20/09 wrote: > On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:40:51 -0700 (PDT), Lifsabsurd > wrote: > >> On Oct 27, 4:38 pm, &#8220;5775 Dead, 918 since 1/20/09&#8243; wrote: >>> On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:26:56 -0700 (PDT), Lifsabsurd >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> wrote: >>>> On Oct [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 10/27/2010 6:40 PM, 5775 Dead, 918 since 1/20/09 wrote:<br />
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:40:51 -0700 (PDT), Lifsabsurd<br />
>
<lifsabsurd @charter.net> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> On Oct 27, 4:38 pm, &#8220;5775 Dead, 918 since 1/20/09&#8243; <dead @dead> wrote:<br />
>>> On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:26:56 -0700 (PDT), Lifsabsurd<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>>
<lifsabs ...@charter.net> wrote:<br />
>>>> On Oct 27, 3:22 pm, Phlip
<phlip2 ...@gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>>>>>> Michelle is by FAR the best writer of all OUR friends&#8230;.she&#8217;s better<br />
>>>>>> than the rest&#8230;love the way she uses all the proper adjectives!<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> In some circles that&#8217;s called being a &#8220;Fine Oriental Beeyotch&#8221;.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> And it&#8217;s a turn-on, just like Palin&#8217;s malapropisms, O&#8217;Donnell&#8217;s<br />
>>>>> fraternity <acronym title="cock"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%k</span></acronym>-teasing, and Angle&#8217;s &#8220;Remember the Alamo&#8221; bullshit.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> (For a little historical perspective, I&#8217;m aware Angle didn&#8217;t actually<br />
>>>>> say that, but &#8220;Remember the Alamo&#8221; refers to the USA stealing land<br />
>>>>> from Mexico&#8230;)<br />
>>><br />
>>>> Well, straight Democrat males always have Joy Behar, Whoopi Goldberg,<br />
>>>> Elena Kagan, Nancy Pelosi, and Helen Thomas to dream about.  Come to<br />
>>>> think of it, maybe that&#8217;s why you are almost all gay.  ROTFLMAO<br />
>>><br />
>>> Have you figured out what gender Ann Coulter is yet?- Hide quoted text -<br />
>>><br />
>>> &#8211; Show quoted text -<br />
>><br />
>> Definitely female.  Have you figured out what species Rachel Maddow is?<br />
><br />
> Definitely human, which means you wouldn&#8217;t be able to breed with her.</p>
<p>No one can breed with her&#8230;..  she won&#8217;t touch a male and two females<br />
don&#8217;t have the tools to breed.</p>
<p>If she can&#8217;t reproduce then her tenuous description as human is in<br />
jeopardy, Life forms are required to reproduce.</p>
<p>[In biology, the science of living organisms, life is the condition<br />
which distinguishes active organisms from inorganic matter.[4] Living<br />
organisms undergo metabolism, maintain homeostasis, possess a capacity<br />
to *grow, respond to stimuli, reproduce* and, through natural selection,<br />
*adapt to their environment in successive generations* .]</p>
<p>How do <acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym> reproduce more <acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym> and adapt to their environment in<br />
successive generations?</p>
</phlip2></lifsabs></dead></lifsabsurd>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/10/27/i-think-i-voted-michelle-malkin-on-top-of-the-lefts-looming-voter-fraud-scandal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WHERE will the BIGOTS go *after* their Anti-Choice &amp; Homophobic Agendas join those of the Segregationists in EXTINCTION?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/10/20/where-will-the-bigots-go-after-their-anti-choice-homophobic-agendas-join-those-of-the-segregationists-in-extinction/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/10/20/where-will-the-bigots-go-after-their-anti-choice-homophobic-agendas-join-those-of-the-segregationists-in-extinction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OBAMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WASHINGTON]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=13943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[> WHERE will the BIGOTS go *after* their > Anti-Choice &#038; Homophobic Agendas > Join those of the Segregationists in EXTINCTION? They can&#8217;t walk to Mexico because the BORDERS are SECURE so says our OBAMA regime. Won&#8217;t be into the Military so says the Liberal judge who really commands the military and neutered Obama during [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>                     WHERE will the BIGOTS go *after* their<br />
>                        Anti-Choice &#038; Homophobic Agendas<br />
>             Join those of the Segregationists in EXTINCTION?</p>
<p>They can&#8217;t walk to Mexico because the BORDERS are SECURE so says our<br />
OBAMA regime.</p>
<p>Won&#8217;t be into the Military so says the Liberal judge who really commands<br />
the military and neutered Obama during two wars.</p>
<p>Won&#8217;t be California that hates Capitalism and Loves taxing/penalizing<br />
success.</p>
<p>It looks like they will be MOVING TO WASHINGTON D.C. to *represent* the<br />
people. Something the Liberals/Democrats have yet to do after 4 years<br />
trying to rule over us with an iron fist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/10/20/where-will-the-bigots-go-after-their-anti-choice-homophobic-agendas-join-those-of-the-segregationists-in-extinction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pay Taxes ONLY on What You BUY&#8230; and NOT on Your ENTIRE INCOME!</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/10/19/pay-taxes-only-on-what-you-buy-and-not-on-your-entire-income/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/10/19/pay-taxes-only-on-what-you-buy-and-not-on-your-entire-income/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=13870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 10/18/2010 8:45 PM, Wayne wrote: > &#8220;(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) http://www.LayoffRemedy.com&#8221; wrote in > message news:2vkpb6lkqtpgpd788is6cm3taouktntb0o @&#038;*$?%4ax.com&#8230; >> X-No-Archive: no >> >> >> Pay Taxes ONLY on What You BUY&#8230; >> &#8230;and NOT on Your ENTIRE INCOME! >> >> >> NO more I.R.S. ??? >> >> NO more INCOME Tax ??? >> >> NO more FORMS [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 10/18/2010 8:45 PM, Wayne wrote:<br />
> &#8220;(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <a href="http://www.LayoffRemedy.com" >http://www.LayoffRemedy.com</a>&#8221; <x @b.com> wrote in<br />
> message news:2vkpb6lkqtpgpd788is6cm3taouktntb0o<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>4ax.com&#8230;<br />
>> X-No-Archive: no<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>         Pay Taxes ONLY on What You BUY&#8230;<br />
>>                 &#8230;and NOT on Your ENTIRE INCOME!<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>      NO more I.R.S. ???<br />
>><br />
>>      NO more INCOME Tax ???<br />
>><br />
>>      NO more FORMS to fill out and submit ???<br />
>><br />
>>      NO more Tax PREPARATION ???<br />
>><br />
>>      Sounds like a DREAM, doesn&#8217;t it?<br />
>><br />
>>      Well &#8212; why not make it come TRUE?<br />
>><br />
> While VAT sounds great, there is very good reason to vehemently oppose it.</p>
<p>NOT VAT, that would be hidden taxes.   SALES TAX is an excise tax.</p>
<p>> The problem is that we will end up with BOTH income tax and VAT.  Income tax<br />
> will never go away because of all the leeches living off tax preparation.<br />
> And the government will never have the discipline to leave VAT in the<br />
> original form&#8230;..a flat tax on consumption.  The government will eventually<br />
> try to make the VAT &#8220;fair&#8221; by having a sliding scale&#8230;.you make more, you<br />
> pay a higher percentage&#8230;..if you don&#8217;t make a minimum amount, you don&#8217;t<br />
> pay VAT.  NO NO NO NO NO NO NO  NO !!!!</p>
<p>Sales tax via a constitutional amendment is the only way to end income<br />
tax and make Sales tax work.  Trying to use both will make everything fail.</p>
<p>STAY away from VAT.</p>
<p>Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression.</p>
<p>End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
prostitutes when there are so many legal tax paying prostitutes out there?<br />
<a href="http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs--crime-usage-falls" >http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs&#8211;crime-usage-falls</a></p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED<br />
money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad. All electronic money leaving the USA would be debited the<br />
Sales tax when the money is sent/spent.</p>
<p>The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drug smuggling less*<br />
*profitable* as would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL<br />
“NEW ITEM” SALES TAX *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE<br />
DRUG DEALERS and illegals by making their tax free money leaving the<br />
country even more valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the RED money<br />
for GREEN money then you would charge the sales tax at that point.</p>
<p>Have the States Ratify an amendment withdrawing the 16th amendment&#8230;<br />
Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (Federal sales<br />
tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED TAX* with the same amendment that<br />
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a Federal *NEW ITEM* sales tax.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
*GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add to<br />
the amendment that if congress raises tax by 1% they are forced to cut<br />
every single expenditure of the government by 3%.</p>
<p>Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
of our military bases along the southern Border to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the Border patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
Federal trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases.</p>
<p>This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
outside the USA. That will make it harder for smugglers to get money out<br />
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch smugglers. We<br />
are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
borrow like income tax does.</p>
<p>This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less welfare and charge them<br />
tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>Pass an amendment to the constitution that makes all<br />
*laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.</p>
<p>There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. And a<br />
constitutional amendment to limit the Interstate Commerce Clause. The<br />
politicians use that clause to justify all sorts of socialist <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>. The<br />
founding fathers never meant for it to be so broadly applied. Limit it<br />
with an amendment, so government can&#8217;t justify every crazy idea by<br />
saying its legal under the interstate commerce clause.</p>
<p>Pass another amendment creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP CONGRESS FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING MONEY.</p>
<p>To quit filling the jails with people over *social taboos* , we<br />
need to take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;social engineer&#8221; businesses or<br />
private people by removing the governments use of tax code to manipulate<br />
people.</p>
<p>Government needs to spend 10% less every year until they meet the<br />
income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
force an across the board spending freeze and then across the board cuts<br />
on the government spending, to do that we have to include a law in our<br />
TAX amendment to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
federal sales tax increase would result in automatic spending cuts using<br />
a baseline of 10% taxes.</p>
<p>And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
them fight their own fights. We also need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
committing, we need fewer police and prisons to support&#8230;. the above<br />
drug and tax plan, will reduce police and prison needs by at least that<br />
10% that this plan suggested cutting each year.</p>
<p>NO welfare to corporations, and cut welfare to private people by 10%<br />
each year until it is 10% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
in DEEP</p>
<p></x></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/10/19/pay-taxes-only-on-what-you-buy-and-not-on-your-entire-income/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservatives Are DELIBERATELY Eliminating American Jobs, Thereby Undermining America</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/10/19/conservatives-are-deliberately-eliminating-american-jobs-thereby-undermining-america/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/10/19/conservatives-are-deliberately-eliminating-american-jobs-thereby-undermining-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=13866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 10/18/2010 9:00 PM, walt tonne wrote: > Deport the up to 20 million illegal aliens and the economy would > skyrocket! *give America back to Americans* Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 10/18/2010 9:00 PM, walt tonne wrote:<br />
> Deport the up to 20 million illegal aliens and the economy would<br />
> skyrocket!</p>
<p>*give America back to Americans*</p>
<p>Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression.</p>
<p>End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
prostitutes when there are so many legal tax paying prostitutes out there?<br />
<a href="http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs--crime-usage-falls" >http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs&#8211;crime-usage-falls</a></p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED<br />
money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad. All electronic money leaving the USA would be debited the<br />
Sales tax when the money is sent/spent.</p>
<p>The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drug smuggling less*<br />
*profitable* as would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL<br />
“NEW ITEM” SALES TAX *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE<br />
DRUG DEALERS and illegals by making their tax free money leaving the<br />
country even more valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the RED money<br />
for GREEN money then you would charge the sales tax at that point.</p>
<p>Have the States Ratify an amendment withdrawing the 16th amendment&#8230;<br />
Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (Federal sales<br />
tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED TAX* with the same amendment that<br />
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a Federal *NEW ITEM* sales tax.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
*GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add to<br />
the amendment that if congress raises tax by 1% they are forced to cut<br />
every single expenditure of the government by 3%.</p>
<p>Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
of our military bases along the southern Border to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the Border patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
Federal trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases.</p>
<p>This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
outside the USA. That will make it harder for smugglers to get money out<br />
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch smugglers. We<br />
are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
borrow like income tax does.</p>
<p>This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less welfare and charge them<br />
tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>Pass an amendment to the constitution that makes all<br />
*laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.</p>
<p>There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. And a<br />
constitutional amendment to limit the Interstate Commerce Clause. The<br />
politicians use that clause to justify all sorts of socialist <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>. The<br />
founding fathers never meant for it to be so broadly applied. Limit it<br />
with an amendment, so government can&#8217;t justify every crazy idea by<br />
saying its legal under the interstate commerce clause.</p>
<p>Pass another amendment creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP CONGRESS FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING MONEY.</p>
<p>To quit filling the jails with people over *social taboos* , we<br />
need to take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;social engineer&#8221; businesses or<br />
private people by removing the governments use of tax code to manipulate<br />
people.</p>
<p>Government needs to spend 10% less every year until they meet the<br />
income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
force an across the board spending freeze and then across the board cuts<br />
on the government spending, to do that we have to include a law in our<br />
TAX amendment to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
federal sales tax increase would result in automatic spending cuts using<br />
a baseline of 10% taxes.</p>
<p>And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
them fight their own fights. We also need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
committing, we need fewer police and prisons to support&#8230;. the above<br />
drug and tax plan, will reduce police and prison needs by at least that<br />
10% that this plan suggested cutting each year.</p>
<p>NO welfare to corporations, and cut welfare to private people by 10%<br />
each year until it is 10% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
in DEEP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/10/19/conservatives-are-deliberately-eliminating-american-jobs-thereby-undermining-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Solve The Crime Problem in Mexico</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/10/16/how-to-solve-the-crime-problem-in-mexico/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/10/16/how-to-solve-the-crime-problem-in-mexico/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=13720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 10/16/2010 2:24 PM, littlebopper wrote: > There is little question but that if the U.S. military can ever be > extracted from its traps in the Middle East, our armed forces will be > compelled to invade Mexico to put down the cartels. > > Which appear to generate more threats to the U.S. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 10/16/2010 2:24 PM, littlebopper wrote:<br />
> There is little question but that if the U.S. military can ever be<br />
> extracted from its traps in the Middle East, our armed forces will be<br />
> compelled to invade Mexico to put down the cartels.<br />
><br />
> Which appear to generate more threats to the U.S. Southwest every day.</p>
<p>*give America back to Americans*</p>
<p>Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression.</p>
<p>End the *war on drugs* make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
prostitutes when there are so many legal tax paying prostitutes out there?<br />
<a href="http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs--crime-usage-falls" >http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs&#8211;crime-usage-falls</a></p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly *sending red money home to Mexico* would be useless as the RED<br />
money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad. All electronic money leaving the USA would be debited the<br />
Sales tax when the money is sent/spent.</p>
<p>The *Drug dealers would have Red money* that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drug smuggling less*<br />
*profitable* as would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL<br />
“NEW ITEM” SALES TAX *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE<br />
DRUG DEALERS and illegals by making their tax free money leaving the<br />
country even more valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the RED money<br />
for GREEN money then you would charge the sales tax at that point.</p>
<p>Have the States Ratify an amendment withdrawing the 16th amendment&#8230;<br />
Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (Federal sales<br />
tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED TAX* with the same amendment that<br />
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a Federal *NEW ITEM* sales tax.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
*GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add to<br />
the amendment that if congress raises tax by 1% they are forced to cut<br />
every single expenditure of the government by 3%.</p>
<p>Begin to *draw down troops as needed from around the world* . Put half<br />
of our military *bases along the southern Border* to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the Border patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
Federal trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases.</p>
<p>This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
outside the USA. That will make it harder for smugglers to get money out<br />
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch smugglers. We<br />
are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
borrow like income tax does.</p>
<p>This will *drive people in the underground economy* to become part of<br />
the real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
*immigration problems with illegals stealing identities* since they will<br />
be paying tax(as sales tax). *Offer illegals less welfare* and charge<br />
them tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to<br />
chase them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>Pass an amendment to the constitution that makes all<br />
*laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.</p>
<p>There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. And a<br />
constitutional amendment to limit the Interstate Commerce Clause. The<br />
politicians use that clause to justify all sorts of socialist <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>. The<br />
founding fathers never meant for it to be so broadly applied. Limit it<br />
with an amendment, so government can&#8217;t justify every crazy idea by<br />
saying its legal under the interstate commerce clause.</p>
<p>Pass another amendment creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP CONGRESS FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING MONEY.</p>
<p>To quit filling the jails with people over *social taboos* , we<br />
need to take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;social engineer&#8221; businesses or<br />
private people by removing the governments use of tax code to manipulate<br />
people.</p>
<p>Government needs to spend 10% less every year until they meet the<br />
income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
force an across the board spending freeze and then across the board cuts<br />
on the government spending, to do that we have to include a law in our<br />
TAX amendment to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
federal sales tax increase would result in automatic spending cuts using<br />
a baseline of 10% taxes.</p>
<p>And we need to *give up our roll as the police man of the world* , let<br />
them fight their own fights. We also need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
committing, we need fewer police and prisons to support&#8230;. the above<br />
drug and tax plan, will reduce police and prison needs by at least that<br />
10% that this plan suggested cutting each year.</p>
<p>NO welfare to corporations, and cut welfare to private people by 10%<br />
each year until it is 10% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
in DEEP for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/10/16/how-to-solve-the-crime-problem-in-mexico/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jet Ski Party at Smuggler&#8217;s Lake</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/10/09/jet-ski-party-at-smugglers-lake/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/10/09/jet-ski-party-at-smugglers-lake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 15:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=13329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 10/9/2010 11:29 AM, dave wrote: > Ray Fischer wrote: > >>>> The border is safer and ore secure than any time in history. Oil is >>>> killing us. You are a tool. >>> >>> A guy was just killed on a jet-ski at a BORDER LAKE. >> >> Just one?!? Golly! There are about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 10/9/2010 11:29 AM, dave wrote:<br />
> Ray Fischer wrote:<br />
><br />
>>>> The border is safer and ore secure than any time in history.  Oil is<br />
>>>> killing us. You are a tool.<br />
>>><br />
>>> A guy was just killed on a jet-ski at a BORDER LAKE.<br />
>><br />
>> Just one?!?  Golly!  There are about 20,000 murders every year in the US.<br />
>><br />
><br />
> Anybody who goes to Mexico, let alone a well known smuggling corridor,<br />
> on a pleasure craft, deserves a Darwin Award. WTF were these people<br />
> thinking?</p>
<p>Well DDDDdddddaaaahhhhhh.   But the BORDER is Obviously not safer than<br />
ever before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/10/09/jet-ski-party-at-smugglers-lake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We&#8217;ll cut .we&#8217;ll cut. . .something</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/10/08/well-cut-well-cut-something-10/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/10/08/well-cut-well-cut-something-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 17:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=13273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 10/8/2010 12:42 PM, John Smith wrote: > On 10/8/2010 8:47 AM, dave wrote: > >> &#8230; >> Because the Republicans are running more-dangerously-psychotic-than >> usual candidates for office this time? >> >> The border is safer and ore secure than any time in history. Oil is >> killing us. You are a tool. > [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 10/8/2010 12:42 PM, John Smith wrote:<br />
> On 10/8/2010 8:47 AM, dave wrote:<br />
><br />
>> &#8230;<br />
>> Because the Republicans are running more-dangerously-psychotic-than<br />
>> usual candidates for office this time?<br />
>><br />
>> The border is safer and ore secure than any time in history. Oil is<br />
>> killing us. You are a tool.<br />
><br />
> More 60-80 lb backpacks of drugs are coming over than border than any<br />
> other time in history.  Illegals serve as mules for this purpose to get<br />
> their first grubstake of money here &#8230; most in law enforcement can tell<br />
> you about this &#8230; if they aren&#8217;t involved in it, themselves!  With the<br />
> kind of money we are talking about, the financial lure just tends to be<br />
> too much for many of them.</p>
<p>Growing Marijuana may be a help to the JOB market.</p>
<p>Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression.</p>
<p>End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
prostitutes when there are so many legal tax paying prostitutes out there?<br />
<a href="http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs--crime-usage-falls" >http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs&#8211;crime-usage-falls</a></p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED<br />
money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad. All electronic money leaving the USA would be debited the<br />
Sales tax when the money is sent/spent.</p>
<p>The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drug smuggling less*<br />
*profitable* as would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL<br />
“NEW ITEM” SALES TAX *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE<br />
DRUG DEALERS and illegals by making their tax free money leaving the<br />
country even more valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the RED money<br />
for GREEN money then you would charge the sales tax at that point.</p>
<p>Have the States Ratify an amendment withdrawing the 16th amendment&#8230;<br />
Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (Federal sales<br />
tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED TAX* with the same amendment that<br />
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a Federal *NEW ITEM* sales tax.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
*GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add to<br />
the amendment that if congress raises tax by 1% they are forced to cut<br />
every single expenditure of the government by 3%.</p>
<p>Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
of our military bases along the southern Border to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the Border patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
Federal trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases.</p>
<p>This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
outside the USA. That will make it harder for smugglers to get money out<br />
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch smugglers. We<br />
are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
borrow like income tax does.</p>
<p>This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less welfare and charge them<br />
tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>Pass an amendment to the constitution that makes all<br />
*laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.</p>
<p>There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. And a<br />
constitutional amendment to limit the Interstate Commerce Clause. The<br />
politicians use that clause to justify all sorts of socialist <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>. The<br />
founding fathers never meant for it to be so broadly applied. Limit it<br />
with an amendment, so government can&#8217;t justify every crazy idea by<br />
saying its legal under the interstate commerce clause.</p>
<p>Pass another amendment creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP CONGRESS FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING MONEY.</p>
<p>To quit filling the jails with people over *social taboos* , we<br />
need to take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;social engineer&#8221; businesses or<br />
private people by removing the governments use of tax code to manipulate<br />
people.</p>
<p>Government needs to spend 10% less every year until they meet the<br />
income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
force an across the board spending freeze and then across the board cuts<br />
on the government spending, to do that we have to include a law in our<br />
TAX amendment to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
federal sales tax increase would result in automatic spending cuts using<br />
a baseline of 10% taxes.</p>
<p>And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
them fight their own fights. We also need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
committing, we need fewer police and prisons to support&#8230;. the above<br />
drug and tax plan, will reduce police and prison needs by at least that<br />
10% that this plan suggested cutting each year.</p>
<p>NO welfare to corporations, and cut welfare to private people by 10%<br />
each year until it is 10% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
in DEEP for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/10/08/well-cut-well-cut-something-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meg Wants Fearful Employees</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/10/06/meg-wants-fearful-employees/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/10/06/meg-wants-fearful-employees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 15:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=13165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 10/6/2010 11:27 AM, Bret Cahill wrote: > Meg likes illegals because they ask how high when she tells them to > jump. > > The liberals who want amnesty are trying to prevent Meg from importing > the despotism of Mexico. > > > Bret Cahill Meg oppressed that Maid to the tune of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 10/6/2010 11:27 AM, Bret Cahill wrote:<br />
> Meg likes illegals because they ask how high when she tells them to<br />
> jump.<br />
><br />
> The liberals who want amnesty are trying to prevent Meg from importing<br />
> the despotism of Mexico.<br />
><br />
><br />
> Bret Cahill</p>
<p>Meg oppressed that Maid to the tune of $23.00hr  ?</p>
<p>I sure feel sorry for that illegal Maid that forged State and Federal<br />
documents and lied to her employer.</p>
<p>Is that one of those JOBS that Americans just wont do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/10/06/meg-wants-fearful-employees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obamanistas are Socialist like Sandinistas</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/09/28/obamanistas-are-socialist-like-sandinistas/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/09/28/obamanistas-are-socialist-like-sandinistas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=12707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obamanistas are Socialist like *THE Sandinistas* that come up from South America and Socialist Venezuela and Mexico to agitate for Obama and push the Socialist agenda. Democrats are importing Socialist agitators because Americans won&#8217;t take to the streets on behalf of Socialism. http://www.borderinvasionpics.com/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obamanistas are Socialist like *THE Sandinistas* that come up from South<br />
America and Socialist Venezuela and Mexico to agitate for Obama and push<br />
the Socialist agenda.   Democrats are importing Socialist agitators<br />
because Americans won&#8217;t take to the streets on behalf of Socialism.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.borderinvasionpics.com/" >http://www.borderinvasionpics.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/09/28/obamanistas-are-socialist-like-sandinistas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;fair tax&#8217; plan to kill federal income taxes</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/09/26/fair-tax-plan-to-kill-federal-income-taxes-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/09/26/fair-tax-plan-to-kill-federal-income-taxes-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=12643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 9/25/2010 12:51 PM, ray wrote: > In article , > No Surrender @&#038;*$?%never.net wrote: > >> On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 10:27:57 -0400, ray wrote: >> >>> In article , >>> No Surrender @&#038;*$?%never.net wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 21:10:18 -0700, edmusgrave @&#038;*$?%webtv.net (Ed Musgrave) >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Sounds like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 9/25/2010 12:51 PM, ray wrote:<br />
> In article <at3s96ddojoccbstv1g88b78umf6s8r8h0 @4ax.com>,<br />
>  No <a href="mailto:Surrender<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>never.net">Surrender<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>never.net</a> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 10:27:57 -0400, ray <xxxrayted @aol.com> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>> In article <jsah96p9mm0ghq74m8fcfs5mbj9104ct4p @4ax.com>,<br />
>>> No <a href="mailto:Surrender<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>never.net">Surrender<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>never.net</a> wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 21:10:18 -0700, <a href="mailto:edmusgrave<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>webtv.net">edmusgrave<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>webtv.net</a> (Ed Musgrave)<br />
>>>> wrote:<br />
>>>><br />
>>>>> Sounds like the &#8220;fair tax&#8221; increases taxes on lower income people, who<br />
>>>>> pay no income tax now. It must decrease taxes on high earners. We are<br />
>>>>> talking aabout income distribution. Who is to judge what is fair about<br />
>>>>> income distribution in America.Because of the vast tilt toward the<br />
>>>>> wealthy, I would guess all the income distribution in this country is<br />
>>>>> unfair. Giving more to the wealthy and taking from the lower incomes<br />
>>>>> only makes it more unfair.<br />
>>>> ***********<br />
>>>> Read the fair tax book. The plan gives deductions for low income earners.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> For me, however, the flat tax is best.<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>> I&#8217;m more for a progressive consumption tax myself.  Do you know how many<br />
>>> people are out there that don&#8217;t pay tax?  A consumption tax would<br />
>>> guarantee everybody pays taxes including those illegals hanging around<br />
>>> in Arizona.<br />
>> ************<br />
>> Yes, such a tax have its charms. Don&#8217;t know about the progressive part of it.<br />
>> What does that mean?<br />
><br />
> It&#8217;s my own idea actually.  One of the problems with introducing a<br />
> consumption tax is that liberals would complain that the wealthy get off<br />
> easy because they pay the same percentage of tax as the poor.<br />
><br />
> Progressive consumption tax would work so that necessities are taxed at<br />
> a lower percentage (arbitrary figure here, 2%) and as you move up the<br />
> ladder on items, the tax gets higher as well.  Say an SUV would have a<br />
> 20% tax on it.  Cable or satellite television a 5% tax. A vacation home<br />
> a 35% tax.   A yacht, 50% tax and so on.  That would keep the liberals<br />
> from complaining that the rich don&#8217;t pay enough, and perhaps get them on<br />
> board to support a consumption tax.</p>
<p>Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression.</p>
<p>End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
prostitutes when there are so many legal tax paying prostitutes out there?<br />
<a href="http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs--crime-usage-falls" >http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs&#8211;crime-usage-falls</a></p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED<br />
money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad. All electronic money leaving the USA would be debited the<br />
Sales tax when the money is sent/spent.</p>
<p>The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drug smuggling less*<br />
*profitable* as would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL<br />
“NEW ITEM” SALES TAX *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE<br />
DRUG DEALERS and illegals by making their tax free money leaving the<br />
country even more valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the RED money<br />
for GREEN money then you would charge the sales tax at that point.</p>
<p>Have the States Ratify an amendment withdrawing the 16th amendment&#8230;<br />
Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (Federal sales<br />
tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED TAX* with the same amendment that<br />
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a Federal *NEW ITEM* sales tax.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
*GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add to<br />
the amendment that if congress raises tax by 1% they are forced to cut<br />
every single expenditure of the government by 3%.</p>
<p>Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
of our military bases along the southern Border to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the Border patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
Federal trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases.</p>
<p>This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
outside the USA. That will make it harder for smugglers to get money out<br />
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch smugglers. We<br />
are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
borrow like income tax does.</p>
<p>This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less welfare and charge them<br />
tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>Pass an amendment to the constitution that makes all<br />
*laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.</p>
<p>There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. And a<br />
constitutional amendment to limit the Interstate Commerce Clause. The<br />
politicians use that clause to justify all sorts of socialist <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>. The<br />
founding fathers never meant for it to be so broadly applied. Limit it<br />
with an amendment, so government can&#8217;t justify every crazy idea by<br />
saying its legal under the interstate commerce clause.</p>
<p>Pass another amendment creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP CONGRESS FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING MONEY.</p>
<p>To quit filling the jails with people over *social taboos* , we<br />
need to take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;social engineer&#8221; businesses or<br />
private people by removing the governments use of tax code to manipulate<br />
people.</p>
<p>Government needs to spend 10% less every year until they meet the<br />
income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
force an across the board spending freeze and then across the board cuts<br />
on the government spending, to do that we have to include a law in our<br />
TAX amendment to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
federal sales tax increase would result in automatic spending cuts using<br />
a baseline of 10% taxes.</p>
<p>And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
them fight their own fights. We also need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
committing, we need fewer police and prisons to support&#8230;. the above<br />
drug and tax plan, will reduce police and prison needs by at least that<br />
10% that this plan suggested cutting each year.</p>
<p>NO welfare to corporations, and cut welfare to private people by 10%<br />
each year until it is 10% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
in DEEP for a long time.</p>
<p></jsah96p9mm0ghq74m8fcfs5mbj9104ct4p></xxxrayted></at3s96ddojoccbstv1g88b78umf6s8r8h0></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/09/26/fair-tax-plan-to-kill-federal-income-taxes-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Marijuana&#8221; Cures Cancer</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/09/20/marijuana-cures-cancer/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/09/20/marijuana-cures-cancer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=12303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 9/19/2010 4:11 PM, Tesla wrote: > > > See . . . > > > 1. &#8220;Cannabis Cures Cancer &#8211; &#8216;Run From The Cure&#8217; The Rick Simpson Story&#8221;: > > http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7331006790306000271 > > > Also see . . . > > > 2. Cannabis Cures Cancer (A short list of links to official studies): [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 9/19/2010 4:11 PM, Tesla wrote:<br />
><br />
><br />
> See . . .<br />
><br />
><br />
> 1. &#8220;Cannabis Cures Cancer &#8211; &#8216;Run From The Cure&#8217; The Rick Simpson Story&#8221;:<br />
><br />
> <a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7331006790306000271" >http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7331006790306000271</a><br />
><br />
><br />
> Also see . . .<br />
><br />
><br />
> 2. Cannabis Cures Cancer (A short list of links to official studies):<br />
><br />
> <a href="http://www.marijuanacurescancer.net/marijuana-compound-may-fight" >http://www.marijuanacurescancer.net/marijuana-compound-may-fight</a><br />
> lung-cancer-healthday.html<br />
><br />
><br />
><br />
> 3. From the British Journal of Cancer:<br />
><br />
> &#8220;A pilot clinical study of [Delta]9-tetrahydrocannabinol in patients<br />
> with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme&#8221; (This includes prostate cancer)<br />
><br />
> <a href="http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v95/n2/full/6603236a.html" >http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v95/n2/full/6603236a.html</a><br />
><br />
><br />
><br />
> 4. From BioMed Central Ltd:<br />
><br />
> &#8220;Molecular Cancer  Full text  Cannabinoids reduce ErbB2-driven breast<br />
> cancer progression through Akt inhibition&#8221; (This also includes prostate<br />
> cancer)&#8221;<br />
><br />
> <a href="http://www.molecular-cancer.com/content/9/1/196" >http://www.molecular-cancer.com/content/9/1/196</a><br />
><br />
><br />
><br />
> 5. From the FASEB Journal:<br />
><br />
> &#8220;Inhibition of tumor angiogenesis by cannabinoids &#8212; BLÁZQUEZ et al_ 17<br />
> (3) 529&#8243;<br />
><br />
> <a href="http://www.fasebj.org/cgi/content/full/17/3/529" >http://www.fasebj.org/cgi/content/full/17/3/529</a><br />
><br />
><br />
><br />
> 6. From the Journal of the American Society for Clinical Investigation:<br />
><br />
> &#8220;Inhibition of skin tumor growth and angiogenesis in vivo by activation<br />
> of cannabinoid receptors&#8221;<br />
><br />
> <a href="http://www.jci.org/articles/view/16116/" >http://www.jci.org/articles/view/16116/</a><br />
><br />
><br />
><br />
> 7. The International Association for Cannabis as Medicine:<br />
><br />
> <a href="http://www.cannabis-med.org/index.php?tpl=page&#038;id=18&#038;lng=en" >http://www.cannabis-med.org/index.php?tpl=page&#038;id=18&#038;lng=en</a><br />
><br />
><br />
And give America back to Americans</p>
<p>Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression.</p>
<p>End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
prostitutes when there are so many legal tax paying prostitutes out there?<br />
<a href="http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs--crime-usage-falls" >http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&#038;title=portugal-legalizes-drugs&#8211;crime-usage-falls</a></p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED<br />
money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad. All electronic money leaving the USA would be debited the<br />
Sales tax when the money is sent.</p>
<p>The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drugs less profitable* as<br />
would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL “NEW ITEM” SALES<br />
TAX *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE DRUG DEALERS and<br />
illegals by making their tax free money leaving the country even more<br />
valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the RED money for GREEN money then<br />
you would charge the sales tax at that point.</p>
<p>Have the States Ratify an amendment withdrawing the 16th amendment&#8230;<br />
Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (Federal sales<br />
tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED TAX* with the same amendment that<br />
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a Federal *NEW ITEM* sales tax.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
*GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add the<br />
amendment to it that if congress raises tax by 1% they are forced to cut<br />
every single expenditure of the government by 3%.</p>
<p>Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
of our military bases along the southern Border to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the Border patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
Federal trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases.</p>
<p>This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
outside the USA. That will make it harder for smugglers to get money out<br />
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch smugglers. We<br />
are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
borrow like income tax does.</p>
<p>This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less welfare and charge them<br />
tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>Pass an amendment to the constitution that makes all<br />
*laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.</p>
<p>There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. And a<br />
constitutional amendment to limit the Interstate Commerce Clause. The<br />
politicians use that clause to justify all sorts of socialist <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>. The<br />
founding fathers never meant for it to be so broadly applied. Limit it<br />
in with an ammendment, so lgovernment can&#8217;t justify every crazy idea by<br />
saying its legal under the interstate commerce clause.</p>
<p>Pass another amendment creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP CONGRESS FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING MONEY.</p>
<p>To quit filling the jails with people over *social taboos* , we<br />
need to take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;social engineer&#8221; businesses or<br />
private people by removing the governments tax code.</p>
<p>Government needs to spend 10% less every year until they meet the<br />
income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
force an across the board spending freeze and then across the board cuts<br />
on the government spending, to do that we have to include a law in our<br />
TAX amendment to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
tax would result in automatic spending cuts using a baseline of 10% taxes.</p>
<p>And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
them fight their own fights. We need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
committing, we need fewer police and prisons&#8230;.the above drug and tax<br />
plan&#8230;. will reduce police and prison needs by at least that 10% that<br />
this plan suggested cutting each year.</p>
<p>NO welfare to corporations, and cut welfare to private people by 10%<br />
each year until it is 10% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
in DEEP for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/09/20/marijuana-cures-cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cutting the flow of money to criminal/tyrannical/genocidal armies.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/09/13/cutting-the-flow-of-money-to-criminaltyrannicalgenocidal-armies/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/09/13/cutting-the-flow-of-money-to-criminaltyrannicalgenocidal-armies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 20:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=11974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 9/13/2010 4:04 PM, J.H.Boersema wrote: > The big bankers in the world probably know very well what they are > doing. As a principle in my proposed revolution it is essential to > install a new currency merely to destroy their funds which they > will be using to fund genocide and crimes of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 9/13/2010 4:04 PM, J.H.Boersema wrote:<br />
> The big bankers in the world probably know very well what they are<br />
> doing. As a principle in my proposed revolution it is essential to<br />
> install a new currency merely to destroy their funds which they<br />
> will be using to fund genocide and crimes of unimaginable proportions<br />
> against the people(s) and the revolution and honorable people in<br />
> particular. I always thougt thaht it was going to be a tough fight<br />
> to destroy that wealth, because they will hide it all over the world<br />
> and in all kinds of control mechanisms.<br />
><br />
> Because it is so terribly difficult, I think now that it may be<br />
> better to get even more pro-active about it, especially if we are<br />
> indeed being faced with genocidal war machines.<br />
><br />
> I mean &#8211; though i don&#8217;t like it much &#8211; that we should try to get<br />
> at these bankers, declare laws that make funding terrorism a crime,<br />
> and lock them up securely enough so that they will not be able to<br />
> fund their war machines any longer even if they have their wealth<br />
> stashed where we haven&#8217;t yet found it.<br />
><br />
> In order to secure the perimeter, so that they have no secret<br />
> communication channels, no goods or information should generally<br />
> get out of the place where they are housed. They should also not<br />
> be able to talk with each other at all, in any way. Sadly enough<br />
> they are cunning enough to device all kinds of schemes, and may<br />
> entice fellow inmates with the mountains of cash they control on<br />
> the outside (perhaps).<br />
><br />
> We should get some high end criminals who have turned to the side<br />
> of good, or just pay them big, to assist us in boxing in these<br />
> bankers securily enough. Who better to box them in then the experts<br />
> who have had decades of experience breaking jail systems that<br />
> appear unbreakable ? An interesting way is to house them somewhere,<br />
> where the guards don&#8217;t even speak their language.<br />
><br />
> I&#8217;m sorry that it would have to be this rough, the record shows<br />
> I&#8217;d favor letting them run wild, but they are just too dangerous<br />
> with the way they fund terrorism, world wars, holocausts, and like<br />
> unimaginable attrocities.<br />
><br />
> However they&#8217;d still need to be convicted on evidence that holds up<br />
> in a fair court; so we have to get that, which will probably prove<br />
> very difficult.<br />
><br />
> On the other hand if we do declare a war on capital, they could be<br />
> captured as being enemies and be held under the rules of POW, which<br />
> seems fair. Them being bankers there is no way they are not capitalists.<br />
> We could then have 3 categories:<br />
> &#8211; moronic member of the public who happened to get embroiled in the rent<br />
>   seeking trade by accident,<br />
> &#8211; lieutenants, somewhat smarter such moronic public members,<br />
> &#8211; captains.<br />
><br />
> It is the captains and higher lieutenants we need in jail.<br />
><br />
> But now that this is said they will make schemes around that too. These<br />
> things would obviously come out.<br />
><br />
> So we need to cast a wide net of information gathering around the<br />
> bankers, and make tip funds available of very serious amounts for teh<br />
> people who lead us to hidden banker loot that is going to be used against<br />
> the people.<br />
><br />
> Every possibly scheme will be used against us, schemes around schemes<br />
> and schemes around schemes aroud schemes around schemes, without end.<br />
><br />
> We will of course also need to target the mercenaries bought directly,<br />
> but that is a usual course of war problem which is obvious already.<br />
><br />
> We need to find out who payes the mercenaries, and trace the money from<br />
> there. We could decide to throw the top bankers and such &#8211; the kinds of<br />
> circles that supported Hitler for example &#8211; out of our nation, and if<br />
> we are faced with genocidal anti-revolutionary warfare to again find<br />
> out where the supply lines lead. We can trace those supply lines<br />
> both from the point of the mercenaries, and from the bankers who are the<br />
> usual suspects, and anyone whom they might have chartered (which is<br />
> virtually anyone in the entire world) for aspects of this.<br />
><br />
> We have to look in the obvious places, in the least likely places,<br />
> and everything in between. From Saharan villages, to deep frozen cities,<br />
> from central Paris to the sub-urbs of Bonn, from the Federal Reserve,<br />
> to all the usual tax havens such as Luxembourg and Monaco. We need to<br />
> have a full research of the entire global ruling class network, who<br />
> knows whom, who playes golf with whom, who payed whom. Who was in bed<br />
> with Hitler, who changed their names to stay in business afterwards.<br />
> Who has made hte Iraq war happen, and who joined in with beating the war<br />
> drums.<br />
><br />
> That will yield a list of tens of thousands of people who are the<br />
> primary suspects (not guilty until proven guilty), for the network that<br />
> might be busy with funding genocide on the revolution.<br />
><br />
> People with managerial power in businesses, all the usual suspects of<br />
> the Harvard University, Rhodes and Rothshild and all that money grants<br />
> to research and buildings and institutions. In some sense it is an<br />
> enormous network i guess, but that is the great system of global<br />
> capitalist control, from inside where it comes.<br />
><br />
> Another angle is to trace the links of organized crimed, because the<br />
> back door of the ruling classes is organized crime.<br />
><br />
> Also we shouldn&#8217;t see a criminal everywhere but remain realistic.<br />
> A lot of people have a much failing moral sense, without really being<br />
> criminals. But when there is a war ongoing with mercenaries and people<br />
> die by the tens of thousands, we need to do what we can to cut the flow<br />
> of support for our enemies, to get at their funding/supplies.</p>
<p>Bail out of NATO then&#8230;..</p>
<p>*HOW TO ALLOW AMERICA TO SURVIVE*<br />
And give America back to Americans</p>
<p>Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression.</p>
<p>End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
prostitutes when there are so many legal tax paying prostitutes out there?</p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED<br />
money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad. All electronic money leaving the USA would be debited the<br />
Sales tax when the money is sent.</p>
<p>The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drugs less profitable* as<br />
would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL “NEW ITEM” SALES<br />
TAX *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE DRUG DEALERS and<br />
illegals by making their tax free money leaving the country even more<br />
valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the RED money for GREEN money then<br />
you would charge the sales tax at that point.</p>
<p>Have the States Ratify an amendment withdrawing the 16th amendment&#8230;<br />
Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (Federal sales<br />
tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED TAX* with the same amendment that<br />
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a Federal *NEW ITEM* sales tax.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
*GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add the<br />
amendment to it that if congress raises tax by 1% they are forced to cut<br />
every single expenditure of the government by 3%.</p>
<p>Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
of our military bases along the southern Border to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the Border patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
Federal trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases.</p>
<p>This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
outside the USA. That will make it harder for smugglers to get money out<br />
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch smugglers. We<br />
are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
borrow like income tax does.</p>
<p>This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less welfare and charge them<br />
tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>Pass an amendment to the constitution that makes all<br />
*laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.</p>
<p>There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. And a<br />
constitutional amendment to limit the Interstate Commerce Clause. The<br />
politicians use that clause to justify all sorts of socialist <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>. The<br />
founding fathers never meant for it to be so broadly applied. Limit it<br />
in with an ammendment, so lgovernment can&#8217;t justify every crazy idea by<br />
saying its legal under the interstate commerce clause.</p>
<p>Pass another amendment creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP CONGRESS FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING MONEY.</p>
<p>To quit filling the jails with people over *social taboos* , we<br />
need to take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;social engineer&#8221; businesses or<br />
private people by removing the governments tax code.</p>
<p>Government needs to spend 10% less every year until they meet the<br />
income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
force an across the board spending freeze and then across the board cuts<br />
on the government spending, to do that we have to include a law in our<br />
TAX amendment to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
tax would result in automatic spending cuts using a baseline of 10% taxes.</p>
<p>And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
them fight their own fights. We need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
committing, we need fewer police and prisons&#8230;.the above drug and tax<br />
plan&#8230;. will reduce police and prison needs by at least that 10% that<br />
this plan suggested cutting each year.</p>
<p>NO welfare to corporations, and cut welfare to private people by 10%<br />
each year until it is 10% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
in DEEP for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/09/13/cutting-the-flow-of-money-to-criminaltyrannicalgenocidal-armies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HOW WILL AMERICA SURVIVE</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/08/09/how-will-america-survive/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/08/09/how-will-america-survive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 18:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOVERNMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal-Socialists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=10782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HOW WILL AMERICA SURVIVE *HOW TO ALLOW AMERICA TO SURVIVE* And give America back to Americans Reducing #regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and competition would help us get out of this depression. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HOW WILL AMERICA SURVIVE</p>
<p>*HOW TO ALLOW AMERICA TO SURVIVE*<br />
And give America back to Americans</p>
<p>Reducing <a href='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/regulations/' rel='tag' class="hashtag">#regulations</a> is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression. End the “war on<br />
drugs” make them legal(increase competition) and sold at any drug store<br />
and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will take the BIG money<br />
out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the gangs/dealers<br />
income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and hurt the human<br />
trafficking business income also. Why have illegal <a href='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/prostitutes/' rel='tag' class="hashtag">#prostitutes</a> when<br />
there are so many legal tax paying prostitutes out there? Create<br />
Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green money<br />
outside the USA….. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and suddenly<br />
sending red money home to <a href='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/mexico/' rel='tag' class="hashtag">#Mexico</a> would be useless as the <a href='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/red-money/' rel='tag' class="hashtag">#RED-money</a><br />
would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn’t accept it<br />
abroad. This will work for electronic transfers within or out of the our<br />
national borders, the money is tagged with a marker signifying that it<br />
is red and crossing our border.  The <a href='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/drug/' rel='tag' class="hashtag">#Drug</a> dealers would have Red money<br />
that they need to exchange for green money, makes it hard to do in large<br />
amounts and hard to spend and more expensive to deal with….. that *makes<br />
Drugs less profitable* as would dropping income tax and installing a<br />
NATIONAL “NEW ITEM” SALES TAX. NOT ANY VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE DRUG<br />
DEALERS by making their tax free money leaving the country even more<br />
valuable. Have the States Ratify an amendment withdrawing the 16th<br />
amendment… Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a><br />
(Federal sales tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED TAX* with the same<br />
amendment that removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a Federal *NEW<br />
ITEM* sales tax. This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people<br />
are in jails for and it will give the people back their privacy. It will<br />
also promote *GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less<br />
and buy second hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.<br />
Then add the amendment to it that if congress raises <a href='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/sales-tax/' rel='tag' class="hashtag">#SALES-TAX</a> by 1%<br />
they are  forced to cut every single expenditure of the government by<br />
3%. Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
of our military bases along the southern <a href='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/border/' rel='tag' class="hashtag">#Border</a> to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the Border patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
Federal trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases. This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug<br />
dealers and hookers and other underground economy’s by forcing them to<br />
have to pay tax when they spend their money , which will further reduce<br />
the benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff. There needs to be one<br />
type of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for<br />
use outside the USA. That will make it harder for smugglers to get money<br />
out of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the<br />
sales tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch<br />
<a href='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/smugglers/' rel='tag' class="hashtag">#smugglers</a>. We are “right now” taking money from peoples pay checks<br />
before they get them and at the same time we don’t tax drug dealers or<br />
hookers and illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working<br />
Americans and giving a bonus to illegal activity.</p>
<p>Sales tax will also encourage saving money rather than encouraging the<br />
leveraging of every dime you can borrow like income tax does.This will<br />
drive people in the underground economy to become part of the real<br />
economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our immigration<br />
problems with illegals stealing identities since they will be paying<br />
tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less welfare and charge them tax and<br />
they won’t be so eager to come here and we won’t need to chase them……End<br />
<a href='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/social-security/' rel='tag' class="hashtag">#Social-Security</a> / Medicare, grandfather it out of existence. Pass an<br />
amendment to the constitution that makes all <a href='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/laws-and-treaties/' rel='tag' class="hashtag">#laws-and-treaties</a> have a<br />
seven year sunset clause, and it requires that each law/treaty be voted<br />
by a separate roll call vote every seven years to continue to be<br />
maintained in our laws. There should also be some constitutional<br />
amendments to stifle congress’ borrowing and spending making it more<br />
difficult for that process. Pass another amendment creating term limits<br />
on congress so the House has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a<br />
total of 12 years in either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP CONGRESS<br />
FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING<br />
MONEY. To quit filling the jails with people over *social taboos* , we<br />
need to take away congress’ ability to “social engineer” businesses or<br />
private people by removing the governments tax code. Government needs to<br />
spend 10% less every year until they meet the income of the government.<br />
The best way, is to *use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the <a href='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/congress/' rel='tag' class="hashtag">#Congress</a> should<br />
implement a rule to force an across the board spending freeze and then<br />
across the board cuts on the government spending, to do that we have to<br />
include a law in our TAX  amendment to the constitution that can’t be<br />
easily circumvented, to force them to cut spending 3% for every 1%<br />
Congress raise taxes. So any tax would result in automatic spending cuts<br />
using a baseline of 10% taxes.And we need to give up our roll as the<br />
police man of the world, let them fight their own fights. We need fewer<br />
crimes for people to be committing, we need fewer police and<br />
prisons….the above drug and tax plan…. will reduce police and prison<br />
needs by at least that 10% that this plan suggested cutting each year.NO<br />
welfare to corporations, and cut welfare to private people by 10% each<br />
year until it is 10% of today’s cost. Any way you look at it, we’re in<br />
DEEP for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/08/09/how-will-america-survive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Fact That Mexicans Destroyed Mexico Is Not An Indictment Against  Free Marketry</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/08/03/the-fact-that-mexicans-destroyed-mexico-is-not-an-indictment-against-free-marketry/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/08/03/the-fact-that-mexicans-destroyed-mexico-is-not-an-indictment-against-free-marketry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 18:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=10616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 8/3/2010 1:44 PM, Bret Cahill wrote: >>> The problem isn&#8217;t with free markets but with the frauds claiming to be >>> free marketeers: > >>> www.bretcahill.com > >> If Mexico &#8220;was destroyed&#8221; how come they like NAFTA? > >> Without NAFTA, instead of 10% of Mexico&#8217;s population being illegally >> in the US, we [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 8/3/2010 1:44 PM, Bret Cahill wrote:<br />
>>> The problem isn&#8217;t with free markets but with the frauds claiming to be<br />
>>> free marketeers:<br />
><br />
>>> <a href="http://www.bretcahill.com" >www.bretcahill.com</a><br />
><br />
>> If Mexico &#8220;was destroyed&#8221; how come they like NAFTA?<br />
><br />
>> Without NAFTA, instead of 10% of Mexico&#8217;s population being illegally<br />
>> in the US, we would have a much higher percentage.<br />
><br />
> What were the immigration rates before and after NAFTA, at least until<br />
> about 2005, in absolute and relative numbers?<br />
><br />
> Before NAFTA both wages and cost of living were 5% &#8211; 15% of the U. S.<br />
><br />
> After NAFTA COL was on par with the U.S. but wages rose very little.<br />
><br />
> Why do you think so many Mexicans join so many bloody drug cartels?<br />
><br />
><br />
> Bret Cahill<br />
><br />
></p>
<p>Before the Mexicans moved to Arizona, they destroyed Mexico.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/08/03/the-fact-that-mexicans-destroyed-mexico-is-not-an-indictment-against-free-marketry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Fact That NAFTA Destroyed Mexico Is Not An Indictment Against Free Marketry</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/08/03/the-fact-that-nafta-destroyed-mexico-is-not-an-indictment-against-free-marketry/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/08/03/the-fact-that-nafta-destroyed-mexico-is-not-an-indictment-against-free-marketry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 15:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=10603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 8/3/2010 8:45 AM, Ramon F Herrera wrote: > On Aug 3, 12:12 am, Bret Cahill wrote: >> The problem isn&#8217;t with free markets but with the frauds claiming to be >> free marketeers: >> >> www.bretcahill.com > > > If Mexico &#8220;was destroyed&#8221; how come they like NAFTA? > > Without NAFTA, instead of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 8/3/2010 8:45 AM, Ramon F Herrera wrote:<br />
> On Aug 3, 12:12 am, Bret Cahill <bret_e_cah ...@yahoo.com> wrote:<br />
>> The problem isn&#8217;t with free markets but with the frauds claiming to be<br />
>> free marketeers:<br />
>><br />
>> <a href="http://www.bretcahill.com" >www.bretcahill.com</a><br />
><br />
><br />
> If Mexico &#8220;was destroyed&#8221; how come they like NAFTA?<br />
><br />
> Without NAFTA, instead of 10% of Mexico&#8217;s population being illegally<br />
> in the US, we would have a much higher percentage.</p>
<p>Why come to Racist Arizona? Must be that the U.S.A. isn&#8217;t as bad as all<br />
those Leftists are saying&#8230;.</p>
<p>At the very least we must be better than Mexico.</p>
<p>That means the facts point to Leftists as liars.</p>
<p></bret_e_cah></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/08/03/the-fact-that-nafta-destroyed-mexico-is-not-an-indictment-against-free-marketry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Si, es muy malo</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/31/si-es-muy-malo/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/31/si-es-muy-malo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 16:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=10497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 7/31/2010 8:17 AM, No Surrender @&#038;*$?%never.net wrote: > Saw a great two panel editorial cartoon today. The first shows a person o&#8217; brown color looking at us, holding up an index > finger and admonishing us, &#8220;The Arizona immigration law is unconstitutional!&#8221; He explains why in the next panel: &#8220;It violates > my right [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 7/31/2010 8:17 AM, No <a href="mailto:Surrender<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>never.net">Surrender<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>never.net</a> wrote:<br />
> Saw a great two panel editorial cartoon today. The first shows a person o&#8217; brown color looking at us, holding up an index<br />
> finger and admonishing us, &#8220;The Arizona immigration law is unconstitutional!&#8221; He explains why in the next panel: &#8220;It violates<br />
> my right to be in the United States illegally.&#8221;<br />
><br />
> No surrender!<br />
><br />
> Dionysus</p>
<p>Iran still has 3 American Illegals in Prison a year later.   All they<br />
did was cross the border.  Where were all these &#8220;concerned people&#8221; on<br />
that the last year.  Did Mexico and South America sue Iran on principle?<br />
Obama is out to lunch on that one because they are white and Obama and<br />
Liberals are Racists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/31/si-es-muy-malo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona&#8217;s Hispanics moving to &#8216;other&#8217; states. (I find his story funnier than hell)</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/26/arizonas-hispanics-moving-to-other-states-i-find-his-story-funnier-than-hell-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/26/arizonas-hispanics-moving-to-other-states-i-find-his-story-funnier-than-hell-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=10318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 7/26/2010 3:30 PM, Nickname unavailable wrote: > On Jul 26, 11:37 am, Beam Me Up Scotty Everyth&#8230;@Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote: >> On 7/26/2010 11:32 AM, Nickname unavailable wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Jul 26, 10:26 am, GLOBALIST wrote: >>>> On Jul 26, 10:05 am, brad herschel wrote: >> >>>>> On Jul 26, 8:55 am, GLOBALIST [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 7/26/2010 3:30 PM, Nickname unavailable wrote:<br />
> On Jul 26, 11:37 am, Beam Me Up Scotty
<then -Destroy-<br />
> <a href="mailto:Everyth...@Blackhole.NebulaX.com">Everyth&#8230;@Blackhole.NebulaX.com</a>> wrote:<br />
>> On 7/26/2010 11:32 AM, Nickname unavailable wrote:<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>> On Jul 26, 10:26 am, GLOBALIST <free .tun...@gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>>>> On Jul 26, 10:05 am, brad herschel <bradhersc ...@gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>> On Jul 26, 8:55 am, GLOBALIST <free .tun...@gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> Thousands of Undocumented Workers Flee Arizona<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> If anecdotal evidence compiled by Reuters is to be believed, Arizona<br />
>>>>>> lawmakers who approved a new immigration law set to go into effect<br />
>>>>>> later this week are getting their wish. Thousands of immigrant<br />
>>>>>> families across the state are packing their belongings and leaving.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> The law, which requires police officers to investigate the status of<br />
>>>>>> anyone suspected of being in the country illegally, is intended to<br />
>>>>>> drive out more than 400,000 undocumented landscapers, chambermaids,<br />
>>>>>> house cleaners, and other workers.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>  &#8220;Everyone is selling up the little they have and leaving,&#8221; said Wendi<br />
>>>>>> Villasenor, 31, who plans to leave for Pennsylvania. &#8220;We have no<br />
>>>>>> alternative. They have us cornered,&#8221; said told Reuters as she tried to<br />
>>>>>> sell a kitchen table, chairs and some dishes outside of her home in<br />
>>>>>> Phoenix to finance the move.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>  &#8220;In a sign of a gathering exodus, Mexican businesses from grocers and<br />
>>>>>> butcher shops to diners and beauty salons have shut their doors in<br />
>>>>>> recent weeks as their owners and clients leave,&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>  Reuters reported. (An article published in the Los Angeles Times<br />
>>>>>> provides further reporting on the damage the new law is doing to<br />
>>>>>> shopkeepers and other small business owners.) &#8220;They wanted to drive<br />
>>>>>> Hispanics out of Arizona and they have succeeded even before the law<br />
>>>>>> even comes into effect,&#8221; another woman told Reuters. One of her<br />
>>>>>> neighbors, Gabriela Jaquez, plans to leave for New Mexico with her<br />
>>>>>> husband, who is a legal resident, and their two Phoenix-born children.<br />
>>>>>> &#8220;Under the law, if you transport an illegal immigrant, you are<br />
>>>>>> committing a crime,&#8221; Jaquez said. &#8220;They could arrest him for driving<br />
>>>>>> me to the shops.&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> Read original story in Reuters | Monday, July 26, 2010<br />
>>>>>> ==========================<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> Screw the supreme governor <acronym title="cunt"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%t</span></acronym> of Arizona and her white supremacists<br />
>>>>>> klan.<br />
>><br />
>>>>> Hey there, you want some shitskins then go get &#8216;em?<br />
>><br />
>>>>> Love it! Probably some of the greasers will slip to other states.<br />
>>>>> Share that diversity!<br />
>>>>> Nah, just deep-six the <acronym title="bastards"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> b&*$?%s</span></acronym>.)<br />
>><br />
>>>>> Found a couple of cartoons at this site:<br />
>><br />
>>>>> <a href="http://www.resist.com/The" >http://www.resist.com/The</a> Insurgent- Hide quoted text -<br />
>><br />
>>>>> &#8211; Show quoted text -<br />
>><br />
>>>> We have a rather large community of Hispanics.  Every year we all<br />
>>>> celebrate Cinco de Mayo with them.  They have a large festival in the<br />
>>>> Cherokee Street district.  I would much prefer their company than a<br />
>>>> half wit like you.<br />
>><br />
>>>  agreed. arizona&#8217;s economy is really taking a hit now. i read large<br />
>>> apartment building are emptying, and stores can no longer pay their<br />
>>> bills because they have lost so much business. i hope they come to the<br />
>>> blue states, and tilt a few red districts blue.<br />
>><br />
>> Yes, that means Americans can get into the Emergency Room without a 2<br />
>> hour wait&#8230;&#8230;<br />
><br />
>  empty hospitals will not stay open to long:)</p>
<p>They&#8217;ll just fire the doctors that cut off all those illegal alien&#8217;s<br />
feet and tonsils for $50,000 a pop.</p>
<p></free></bradhersc></free></then>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/26/arizonas-hispanics-moving-to-other-states-i-find-his-story-funnier-than-hell-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HOW WILL AMERICA SURVIVE</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/26/how-to-allow-america-to-survive/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/26/how-to-allow-america-to-survive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOVERNMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal-Socialists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=10117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*HOW TO ALLOW AMERICA TO SURVIVE* And give America back to Americans Reducing #regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and competition would help us get out of this depression. End the &#8220;war on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*HOW TO ALLOW AMERICA TO SURVIVE*<br />
And give America back to Americans</p>
<p>Reducing <a href='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/regulations/' rel='tag' class="hashtag">#regulations</a> is primary since regulation is what stifles commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and competition would help us get out of this depression. End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal <a href='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/prostitutes/' rel='tag' class="hashtag">#prostitutes</a> when there are so many legal tax paying prostitutes out there? Create Bi-color money,<strong> <span style="color: #ff0000;">Red money</span></strong> for inside the USA and Original <strong><span style="color: #339966;">Green money</span></strong> outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and suddenly sending red money home to <a href='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/mexico/' rel='tag' class="hashtag">#Mexico</a> would be useless as the <a href='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/red-money/' rel='tag' class="hashtag">#RED-money</a> would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept it abroad. This will work for electronic transfers within or out of the our national borders, the money is tagged with a marker signifying that it is red and crossing our border.  The <a href='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/drug/' rel='tag' class="hashtag">#Drug</a> dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and more expensive to deal with&#8230;..  that <strong>*makes Drugs less profitable*</strong> as would dropping income tax and installing a NATIONAL &#8220;<strong>NEW ITEM</strong>&#8221; SALES TAX.   NOT ANY VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE DRUG DEALERS by making their tax free money leaving the country even more valuable. Have the States Ratify an amendment withdrawing the 16th amendment&#8230; Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org">http://fairtax.org</a> (Federal sales tax) *<strong>BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED TAX</strong>* with the same amendment that removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a Federal *<strong>NEW ITEM</strong>* sales tax. This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote *GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add the amendment to it that <strong>if congress raises <a href='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/sales-tax/' rel='tag' class="hashtag">#SALES-TAX</a> by 1% they are  forced to cut every single expenditure of the government by 3%</strong>. Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half of our military bases along the southern <a href='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/border/' rel='tag' class="hashtag">#Border</a> to minimize the amount of border that the Border patrol needs to watch, the military and Federal trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the military bases. This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay tax when they spend their money , which will further reduce the benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use outside the USA. That will make it harder for smugglers to get money out of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch <a href='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/smugglers/' rel='tag' class="hashtag">#smugglers</a>. We are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and giving a bonus to illegal activity.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="374" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="374" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Sales tax will also encourage saving money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can borrow like income tax does.This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less welfare and charge them tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase them&#8230;&#8230;End <a href='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/social-security/' rel='tag' class="hashtag">#Social-Security</a> / Medicare, grandfather it out of existence. Pass an amendment to the constitution that makes<strong> all <a href='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/laws-and-treaties/' rel='tag' class="hashtag">#laws-and-treaties</a> have a seven year sunset clause</strong>, and it requires that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven years to continue to be maintained in our laws. There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217; borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. Pass another amendment creating term limits on congress so the House has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in either side of congress. WE NEED TO <strong>STOP CONGRESS FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS LAWS</strong> TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING MONEY. To quit filling the jails with people over *social taboos* , we need to take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;social engineer&#8221; businesses or private people by removing the governments tax code. Government needs to spend 10% less every year until they meet the income of the government. The best way, is to <strong>*use_both_cutting_and_taxing*</strong> , the <a href='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/congress/' rel='tag' class="hashtag">#Congress</a> should implement a rule to force an across the board spending freeze and then across the board cuts on the government spending, to do that we have to include a law in our TAX  amendment to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<strong> force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes</strong>.  So any tax would result in automatic spending cuts using a baseline of 10% taxes.And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let them fight their own fights. We need fewer crimes for people to be committing, we need fewer police and prisons&#8230;.the above drug and tax plan&#8230;. will reduce police and prison needs by at least that 10% that this plan suggested cutting each year.NO welfare to corporations, and cut welfare to private people by 10% each year until it is 10% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re in DEEP for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/26/how-to-allow-america-to-survive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona&#8217;s Hispanics moving to &#8216;other&#8217; states. (I find his story funnier than hell)</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/26/arizonas-hispanics-moving-to-other-states-i-find-his-story-funnier-than-hell/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/26/arizonas-hispanics-moving-to-other-states-i-find-his-story-funnier-than-hell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=10296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 7/26/2010 11:32 AM, Nickname unavailable wrote: > On Jul 26, 10:26 am, GLOBALIST wrote: >> On Jul 26, 10:05 am, brad herschel wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Jul 26, 8:55 am, GLOBALIST wrote: >> >>>> Thousands of Undocumented Workers Flee Arizona >> >>>> If anecdotal evidence compiled by Reuters is to be believed, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 7/26/2010 11:32 AM, Nickname unavailable wrote:<br />
> On Jul 26, 10:26 am, GLOBALIST <free .tun...@gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>> On Jul 26, 10:05 am, brad herschel <bradhersc ...@gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>> On Jul 26, 8:55 am, GLOBALIST <free .tun...@gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>> Thousands of Undocumented Workers Flee Arizona<br />
>><br />
>>>> If anecdotal evidence compiled by Reuters is to be believed, Arizona<br />
>>>> lawmakers who approved a new immigration law set to go into effect<br />
>>>> later this week are getting their wish. Thousands of immigrant<br />
>>>> families across the state are packing their belongings and leaving.<br />
>><br />
>>>> The law, which requires police officers to investigate the status of<br />
>>>> anyone suspected of being in the country illegally, is intended to<br />
>>>> drive out more than 400,000 undocumented landscapers, chambermaids,<br />
>>>> house cleaners, and other workers.<br />
>><br />
>>>>  &#8220;Everyone is selling up the little they have and leaving,&#8221; said Wendi<br />
>>>> Villasenor, 31, who plans to leave for Pennsylvania. &#8220;We have no<br />
>>>> alternative. They have us cornered,&#8221; said told Reuters as she tried to<br />
>>>> sell a kitchen table, chairs and some dishes outside of her home in<br />
>>>> Phoenix to finance the move.<br />
>><br />
>>>>  &#8220;In a sign of a gathering exodus, Mexican businesses from grocers and<br />
>>>> butcher shops to diners and beauty salons have shut their doors in<br />
>>>> recent weeks as their owners and clients leave,&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>>>>  Reuters reported. (An article published in the Los Angeles Times<br />
>>>> provides further reporting on the damage the new law is doing to<br />
>>>> shopkeepers and other small business owners.) &#8220;They wanted to drive<br />
>>>> Hispanics out of Arizona and they have succeeded even before the law<br />
>>>> even comes into effect,&#8221; another woman told Reuters. One of her<br />
>>>> neighbors, Gabriela Jaquez, plans to leave for New Mexico with her<br />
>>>> husband, who is a legal resident, and their two Phoenix-born children.<br />
>>>> &#8220;Under the law, if you transport an illegal immigrant, you are<br />
>>>> committing a crime,&#8221; Jaquez said. &#8220;They could arrest him for driving<br />
>>>> me to the shops.&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>>>> Read original story in Reuters | Monday, July 26, 2010<br />
>>>> ==========================<br />
>><br />
>>>> Screw the supreme governor <acronym title="cunt"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%t</span></acronym> of Arizona and her white supremacists<br />
>>>> klan.<br />
>><br />
>>> Hey there, you want some shitskins then go get &#8216;em?<br />
>><br />
>>> Love it! Probably some of the greasers will slip to other states.<br />
>>> Share that diversity!<br />
>>> Nah, just deep-six the <acronym title="bastards"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> b&*$?%s</span></acronym>.)<br />
>><br />
>>> Found a couple of cartoons at this site:<br />
>><br />
>>> <a href="http://www.resist.com/" >http://www.resist.com/</a> The Insurgent- Hide quoted text -<br />
>><br />
>>> &#8211; Show quoted text -<br />
>><br />
>> We have a rather large community of Hispanics.  Every year we all<br />
>> celebrate Cinco de Mayo with them.  They have a large festival in the<br />
>> Cherokee Street district.  I would much prefer their company than a<br />
>> half wit like you.<br />
><br />
>  agreed. arizona&#8217;s economy is really taking a hit now. i read large<br />
> apartment building are emptying, and stores can no longer pay their<br />
> bills because they have lost so much business. i hope they come to the<br />
> blue states, and tilt a few red districts blue.</p>
<p>Yes, that means Americans can get into the Emergency Room without a 2<br />
hour wait&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p></free></bradhersc></free></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/26/arizonas-hispanics-moving-to-other-states-i-find-his-story-funnier-than-hell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Red Scares&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/25/red-scares-11/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/25/red-scares-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 22:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=10281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 7/25/2010 5:54 PM, Larry G wrote: > On Jul 25, 1:44 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty Everyth&#8230;@Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote: >> On 7/25/2010 11:50 AM, Dave Head wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 08:28:10 -0700 (PDT), Larry G >>> wrote: >> >>>> &#8220;The SS needs to be phased out. Cutting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 7/25/2010 5:54 PM, Larry G wrote:<br />
> On Jul 25, 1:44 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty
<then -Destroy-<br />
> <a href="mailto:Everyth...@Blackhole.NebulaX.com">Everyth&#8230;@Blackhole.NebulaX.com</a>> wrote:<br />
>> On 7/25/2010 11:50 AM, Dave Head wrote:<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 08:28:10 -0700 (PDT), Larry G<br />
>>> <gross .la...@gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>> &#8220;The SS needs to be phased out.  Cutting it suddenly isn&#8217;t possible<br />
>>>> without adversely affecting lots of people. &#8221;<br />
>><br />
>>>> Who is agreeing with you on this? Not the establishment Republicans.<br />
>>>> Not the Tea Party &#8211; the last POLL of them say 2/3 of them do not want<br />
>>>> to get rid of SS.<br />
>><br />
>>> I don&#8217;t really give a rip.  We have to do it.<br />
>><br />
>>>> so WHO do you think will champion this?<br />
>><br />
>>> I&#8217;m not so concerned about that.  It is just my opinion.  What I&#8217;m<br />
>>> concerned about is getting rid of the income tax.  Without doing that,<br />
>>> we will never see prosperity again.<br />
>><br />
>>>> Do you seriously think that the majority of people in this country are<br />
>>>> going to elect to Congress and the Presidency someone who says they<br />
>>>> will phase out SS?<br />
>><br />
>>> Dunno.  Maybe if they are made to understand.<br />
>><br />
>>>> what is Your &#8230; REALISTIC solution here?<br />
>><br />
>>> The realistic solution is to cut the income taxes to zero, thus<br />
>>> supercharging the economy, and therefore cutting the number of really<br />
>>> poor people to very small numbers.  When you get to the point where<br />
>>> everyone has significant money, and starts looking at SS and Medicare<br />
>>> as a drag on their pocketbook and not as a salvation in their old age<br />
>>> which they can afford to take care of themselves anyway, then maybe SS<br />
>>> and Medicare will be repealed.  But the income tax has to die first.<br />
>><br />
>>>> anyone can blather anti-govt rhetoric but where are the solutions?<br />
>><br />
>>               *HOW TO ALLOW AMERICA TO SURVIVE*<br />
>>               And give America back to Americans<br />
>><br />
>>  Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
>> commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
>> regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
>> competition would help us get out of this depression.<br />
>><br />
>>  End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
>> at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
>> take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
>> gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
>> hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
>> prostitutes when there are so many legal tax paying prostitutes out there?<br />
>><br />
>>  Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
>> money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
>> suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED<br />
>> money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
>> it abroad.<br />
>><br />
>>  The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
>> green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
>> more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drugs less profitable* as<br />
>> would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL “NEW ITEM” SALES<br />
>> TAX. *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE DRUG DEALERS and<br />
>> illegals by making their tax free money leaving the country even more<br />
>> valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the RED money for GREEN money then<br />
>> you would charge the sales tax at that point.<br />
>><br />
>>  Have the States Ratify an amendment withdrawing the 16th amendment&#8230;<br />
>> Maybe enact something similar to <a href="thehttp://fairtax.org" >thehttp://fairtax.org</a>(Federal sales<br />
>> tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED TAX* with the same amendment that<br />
>> removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a Federal *NEW ITEM* sales tax.<br />
>><br />
>>          <embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /><br />
>><br />
>>  This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
>> and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
>> *GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
>> hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add the<br />
>> amendment to it that if congress raises tax by 1% they are forced to cut<br />
>> every single expenditure of the government by 3%.<br />
>><br />
>>  Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
>> of our military bases along the southern Border to minimize the amount<br />
>> of border that the Border patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
>> Federal trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
>> military bases.<br />
>><br />
>>  This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
>> hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
>> tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
>> benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
>> of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
>> outside the USA. That will make it harder for smugglers to get money out<br />
>> of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
>> tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch smugglers. We<br />
>> are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
>> them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
>> illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
>> giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
>> money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
>> borrow like income tax does.<br />
>><br />
>>  This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
>> real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
>> immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
>> be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less welfare and charge them<br />
>> tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
>> them&#8230;&#8230;<br />
>><br />
>> End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.<br />
>><br />
>>  Pass an amendment to the constitution that makes all<br />
>> *laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
>> that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
>> years to continue to be maintained in our laws.<br />
>><br />
>>  There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
>> borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process.<br />
>><br />
>>  Pass another amendment creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
>> has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
>> either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP CONGRESS FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
>> LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING MONEY.<br />
>><br />
>>  To quit filling the jails with people over *social taboos* , we<br />
>> need to take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;social engineer&#8221; businesses or<br />
>> private people by removing the governments tax code.<br />
>><br />
>>  Government needs to spend 10% less every year until they meet the<br />
>> income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
>> *use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
>> force an across the board spending freeze and then across the board cuts<br />
>> on the government spending, to do that we have to include a law in our<br />
>> TAX amendment to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
>> force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
>> tax would result in automatic spending cuts using a baseline of 10% taxes.<br />
>><br />
>>  And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
>> them fight their own fights. We need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
>> committing, we need fewer police and prisons&#8230;.the above drug and tax<br />
>> plan&#8230;. will reduce police and prison needs by at least that 10% that<br />
>> this plan suggested cutting each year.<br />
>><br />
>>  NO welfare to corporations, and cut welfare to private people by 10%<br />
>> each year until it is 10% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
>> in DEEP for a long time.<br />
><br />
> ha ha ha &#8230; tell me what legislators are going to do this.  Are you<br />
> favoring a Military Junta to implement these ideas?</p>
<p>NO I don&#8217;t expect it to happen which is why I have no money in this<br />
economy&#8230;..  and never will.   I bailed about 5 years ago when I<br />
started selling everything I owned.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll wait till the Government makes economic sense before I ever put<br />
another dime on the table where you or the government can see it.  I<br />
keep my chips off the table and fold my cards.</p>
<p>maybe in ten years or so&#8230;&#8230;  I&#8217;ll come play again.</p>
<p></gross></then>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/25/red-scares-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Red Scares&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/25/red-scares-8/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/25/red-scares-8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 20:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=10263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 7/25/2010 3:22 PM, Dave Head wrote: > On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 13:44:27 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty > wrote: > >> On 7/25/2010 11:50 AM, Dave Head wrote: >>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 08:28:10 -0700 (PDT), Larry G >>> wrote: >>> >>>> &#8220;The SS needs to be phased out. Cutting it suddenly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 7/25/2010 3:22 PM, Dave Head wrote:<br />
> On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 13:44:27 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty<br />
>
<then -Destroy-Everything<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> On 7/25/2010 11:50 AM, Dave Head wrote:<br />
>>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 08:28:10 -0700 (PDT), Larry G<br />
>>> <gross .larry<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>> &#8220;The SS needs to be phased out.  Cutting it suddenly isn&#8217;t possible<br />
>>>> without adversely affecting lots of people. &#8221;<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Who is agreeing with you on this? Not the establishment Republicans.<br />
>>>> Not the Tea Party &#8211; the last POLL of them say 2/3 of them do not want<br />
>>>> to get rid of SS.<br />
>>><br />
>>> I don&#8217;t really give a rip.  We have to do it.<br />
>>><br />
>>>> so WHO do you think will champion this?<br />
>>><br />
>>> I&#8217;m not so concerned about that.  It is just my opinion.  What I&#8217;m<br />
>>> concerned about is getting rid of the income tax.  Without doing that,<br />
>>> we will never see prosperity again.<br />
>>><br />
>>>> Do you seriously think that the majority of people in this country are<br />
>>>> going to elect to Congress and the Presidency someone who says they<br />
>>>> will phase out SS?<br />
>>><br />
>>> Dunno.  Maybe if they are made to understand.<br />
>>><br />
>>>> what is Your &#8230; REALISTIC solution here?<br />
>>><br />
>>> The realistic solution is to cut the income taxes to zero, thus<br />
>>> supercharging the economy, and therefore cutting the number of really<br />
>>> poor people to very small numbers.  When you get to the point where<br />
>>> everyone has significant money, and starts looking at SS and Medicare<br />
>>> as a drag on their pocketbook and not as a salvation in their old age<br />
>>> which they can afford to take care of themselves anyway, then maybe SS<br />
>>> and Medicare will be repealed.  But the income tax has to die first.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> anyone can blather anti-govt rhetoric but where are the solutions?<br />
>><br />
>>              *HOW TO ALLOW AMERICA TO SURVIVE*<br />
>>              And give America back to Americans<br />
>><br />
>> Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
>> commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
>> regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
>> competition would help us get out of this depression.<br />
><br />
> Yep.  Yet we have to have safety regulations, or people will die, and<br />
> oil wells will blow out and harm the economy, and some fish.<br />
><br />
>> End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
>> at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
>> take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
>> gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
>> hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
>> prostitutes when there are so many legal tax paying prostitutes out there?<br />
><br />
> Yes, the costs of having drugs illegal is far greater than if they<br />
> were legal.  Legalize them, every thing you can think of.<br />
><br />
> I think they should NOT be sold in any drug store, tho.  I think they<br />
> should only be sold in stores outside of town, so&#8217;s most people have<br />
> to get in a car and drive.   Makes it hard on kids trying to buy &#8216;em,<br />
> and they shouldn&#8217;t be selling to kids, anyway.<br />
><br />
>> Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
>> money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
>> suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED<br />
>> money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
>> it abroad.<br />
><br />
> Not bad, but not sure how well it would work.<br />
><br />
>> The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
>> green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
>> more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drugs less profitable* as<br />
>> would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL “NEW ITEM” SALES<br />
>> TAX. *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE DRUG DEALERS and<br />
>> illegals by making their tax free money leaving the country even more<br />
>> valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the RED money for GREEN money then<br />
>> you would charge the sales tax at that point.<br />
><br />
> Aw, just legalize the drugs, and there will be no reason to import<br />
> &#8216;em.  Just grow / manufacture everything here.</p>
<p>There are cars imported&#8230;.  I thing you not only need to level the<br />
playing field rather than give them tax breaks, but go the extra mile to<br />
make importing drugs less lucrative.</p>
<p>I agree that they would make/grow them here&#8230;.  that&#8217;s a good thing.<br />
The money and people are here, and they are taxed to care for the arrest<br />
of illegal importers.</p>
<p>>> Have the States Ratify an amendment withdrawing the 16th amendment&#8230;<br />
>> Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (Federal sales<br />
>> tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED TAX* with the same amendment that<br />
>> removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a Federal *NEW ITEM* sales tax.<br />
><br />
> Yes, if we don&#8217;t nuke the income tax, we are toast.  We will never see<br />
> prosperity again.</p>
<p>You got that right.  It&#8217;s main purpose is to keep the rich rich and the<br />
poor poor.</p>
<p>Progressive income tax is to us today, what feudalism was to people<br />
centuries ago.  It keeps us in our place.</p>
<p>>>          <embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /><br />
>><br />
>> This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
>> and it will give the people back their privacy.<br />
><br />
> Yes, both good goals.<br />
><br />
>> It will also promote<br />
>> *GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
>> hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.<br />
><br />
> Not sure if I can see that, but its not that big a deal.</p>
<p>Got to have something in the language of the Socialist Enviro-nuts, you<br />
can&#8217;t sell a vacuum cleaner at someones door if you don&#8217;t speak their<br />
language.</p>
<p>The way to sell an idea is to make it appeal to your customers and<br />
Socialists Green-weenies seem to be 50% of the people on this ship of fools.</p>
<p>&#8220;Look it not only kills your dogs fleas, but you can drink it after you<br />
filter it through your reusable socks&#8221;</p>
<p>That is how they get eco-freaks to buy POISON and drink it, they call it<br />
VODKA&#8230;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m shameful I know, but the truth never works on Leftists so you are<br />
forced to speak in terms that they can relate to.</p>
<p>>> Then add the<br />
>> amendment to it that if congress raises tax by 1% they are forced to cut<br />
>> every single expenditure of the government by 3%.<br />
><br />
> Naw, I don&#8217;t think I like that one.  Just make a balanced budget<br />
> amendment.   That&#8217;s what we really need.</p>
<p>I really liked this one, besides being original and mine&#8230;.  it<br />
punishes the politicians for raising taxes.  Their pay is a government<br />
expense in &#8221; 3% across the board cuts &#8221;</p>
<p>>> Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
>> of our military bases along the southern Border to minimize the amount<br />
>> of border that the Border patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
>> Federal trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
>> military bases.<br />
><br />
> Hey, not bad.  Good idea.  Just station the troops on the border<br />
> permanently.<br />
></p>
<p>Inside their Federal base&#8230;.  Dual purpose and saves us money and manpower.</p>
<p>> We do need to not be in so many places around the world, but we have<br />
> to make up our minds whether we&#8217;re OK with Red China absorbing Tiawan<br />
> against their will, N. Korea conquering S. Korea, the Taliban taking<br />
> over Afganistan, etc.  Can we apply the nuclear shield to everything -<br />
> you harbor terrorists and attack us, we&#8217;re going to respond by<br />
> reducing your sad little country to a border to border, glass paved,<br />
> self-lighting parking lot.</p>
<p>We have a satellite military umbrella&#8230;..  they can all expect America<br />
use it if we need or want to.</p>
<p>><br />
>> This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
>> hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
>> tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
>> benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
>> of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
>> outside the USA. That will make it harder for smugglers to get money out<br />
>> of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
>> tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch smugglers. We<br />
>> are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
>> them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
>> illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
>> giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
>> money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
>> borrow like income tax does.<br />
>><br />
>> This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
>> real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
>> immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
>> be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less welfare and charge them<br />
>> tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
>> them&#8230;&#8230;<br />
>><br />
>> End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.<br />
><br />
> Yes, need a plan to do this without killing people.   I think it&#8217;d<br />
> take a long time.<br />
></p>
<p>100 years to grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>>> Pass an amendment to the constitution that makes all<br />
>> *laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
>> that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
>> years to continue to be maintained in our laws.<br />
><br />
> That would probably cause too much instability in our foreign<br />
> relations.  Other peoples couldn&#8217;t really trust us to do what we sign<br />
> up to do.<br />
></p>
<p>They already don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>>> There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
>> borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process.<br />
><br />
> Just one &#8211; the balanced budget amendment.<br />
></p>
<p>I see &#8220;the balanced budget amendment&#8221; as giving them to many loopholes<br />
for off budget programs and other abuse.</p>
<p>>> Pass another amendment creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
>> has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
>> either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP CONGRESS FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
>> LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING MONEY.<br />
><br />
> We just need to repeal the 16th amendment, I think, and that&#8217;ll get a<br />
> lot of the corruption out of the tax law, esp. if we substitute the 63<br />
> pages long Fair Tax.<br />
><br />
>> To quit filling the jails with people over *social taboos* , we<br />
>> need to take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;social engineer&#8221; businesses or<br />
>> private people by removing the governments tax code.<br />
><br />
> Yep.  Pass the Fair Tax.<br />
><br />
>> Government needs to spend 10% less every year until they meet the<br />
>> income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
>> *use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
>> force an across the board spending freeze and then across the board cuts<br />
>> on the government spending, to do that we have to include a law in our<br />
>> TAX amendment to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
>> force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
>> tax would result in automatic spending cuts using a baseline of 10% taxes.<br />
><br />
> I don&#8217;t think so.  We&#8217;re going to have to spend more to administer a<br />
> country with a booming economy which will be the result of getting rid<br />
> of the the income tax and substituting the Fair Tax.  We have to be<br />
> careful not to hose ourselves by passing amendments that are not well<br />
> thought out.  The 16th was one of those, I think.  Maybe the 16th<br />
> amendment, too &#8211; we probably shouldn&#8217;t be directly electing senators,<br />
> because it makes the campaign too big of a deal, and too expensive.<br />
></p>
<p>And we lose States rights. Washington has no one representing them in<br />
the Federal Government.</p>
<p>>> And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
>> them fight their own fights. We need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
>> committing, we need fewer police and prisons&#8230;.the above drug and tax<br />
>> plan&#8230;. will reduce police and prison needs by at least that 10% that<br />
>> this plan suggested cutting each year.<br />
><br />
> We just have to be OK with:<br />
><br />
> 1) 1 Korea, all communist<br />
> 2) 1 China, all communist<br />
> 3) 0 Isreal, a post-nuclear wasteland most likely.<br />
> 4) Greatly diminished influence around the world.<br />
></p>
<p>Like it doesn&#8217;t look like this is coming anyways?</p>
<p>>> NO welfare to corporations, and cut welfare to private people by 10%<br />
>> each year until it is 10% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
>> in DEEP for a long time.<br />
><br />
> What welfare to corporations?  No, wait, we should help AMERICAN<br />
> corporations all we can, if they&#8217;re employing Americans.  The best<br />
> help we can give them would be to pass the Fair Tax.</p>
<p>Yes&#8230;  give them no money and get regulations off their back and they<br />
will do just fine hiring Americans.  I have started and manged many<br />
businesses for myself and others&#8230; When Obama got elected I quit trying<br />
to make money, I will start no business and I will NOT manage any<br />
business until the Socialists are run out.</p>
<p></gross></then>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/25/red-scares-8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Red Scares&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/25/red-scares-7/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/25/red-scares-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 19:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=10259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 7/25/2010 2:02 PM, Free Lunch wrote: > On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 13:44:27 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty > wrote in > misc.transport.road: > >> On 7/25/2010 11:50 AM, Dave Head wrote: >>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 08:28:10 -0700 (PDT), Larry G >>> wrote: >>> >>>> &#8220;The SS needs to be phased out. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 7/25/2010 2:02 PM, Free Lunch wrote:<br />
> On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 13:44:27 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty<br />
>
<then -Destroy-Everything<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote in<br />
> misc.transport.road:<br />
><br />
>> On 7/25/2010 11:50 AM, Dave Head wrote:<br />
>>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 08:28:10 -0700 (PDT), Larry G<br />
>>> <gross .larry<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>> &#8220;The SS needs to be phased out.  Cutting it suddenly isn&#8217;t possible<br />
>>>> without adversely affecting lots of people. &#8221;<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Who is agreeing with you on this? Not the establishment Republicans.<br />
>>>> Not the Tea Party &#8211; the last POLL of them say 2/3 of them do not want<br />
>>>> to get rid of SS.<br />
>>><br />
>>> I don&#8217;t really give a rip.  We have to do it.<br />
>>><br />
>>>> so WHO do you think will champion this?<br />
>>><br />
>>> I&#8217;m not so concerned about that.  It is just my opinion.  What I&#8217;m<br />
>>> concerned about is getting rid of the income tax.  Without doing that,<br />
>>> we will never see prosperity again.<br />
>>><br />
>>>> Do you seriously think that the majority of people in this country are<br />
>>>> going to elect to Congress and the Presidency someone who says they<br />
>>>> will phase out SS?<br />
>>><br />
>>> Dunno.  Maybe if they are made to understand.<br />
>>><br />
>>>> what is Your &#8230; REALISTIC solution here?<br />
>>><br />
>>> The realistic solution is to cut the income taxes to zero, thus<br />
>>> supercharging the economy, and therefore cutting the number of really<br />
>>> poor people to very small numbers.  When you get to the point where<br />
>>> everyone has significant money, and starts looking at SS and Medicare<br />
>>> as a drag on their pocketbook and not as a salvation in their old age<br />
>>> which they can afford to take care of themselves anyway, then maybe SS<br />
>>> and Medicare will be repealed.  But the income tax has to die first.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> anyone can blather anti-govt rhetoric but where are the solutions?<br />
>><br />
>>              *HOW TO ALLOW AMERICA TO SURVIVE*<br />
>>              And give America back to Americans<br />
>><br />
>> Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
>> commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
>> regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
>> competition would help us get out of this depression.<br />
><br />
> Lack of regulation allows Massey Energy to kill its own employees<br />
> without punishment. It allows banks to steal from its customers. It<br />
> allows Chinese manufacturers to poison our products.<br />
></p>
<p>So you agree that the NEWS MEDIA is NOT FREE, otherwise they would print<br />
the truth and Massey energy would be bankrupted by the people.</p>
<p>>> End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
>> at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
>> take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
>> gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
>> hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
>> prostitutes when there are so many legal tax paying prostitutes out there?<br />
><br />
> Most recreational drugs need to be legalized and regulated for safety<br />
> and revenue reasons. The war on drugs is a huge failure. Prostitution<br />
> should also be legalized and regulated for the safety of the prostitutes<br />
> and their customers.<br />
><br />
>> Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
>> money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
>> suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED<br />
>> money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
>> it abroad.<br />
><br />
> Money is sent electronically most of the time.</p>
<p>And can be taxes as it crosses the border.  This would keep the status<br />
quo and not allow the Drug dealers and Illegals to simply change to<br />
envelopes and cash to avoid sales tax.</p>
<p>>> The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
>> green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
>> more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drugs less profitable* as<br />
>> would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL “NEW ITEM” SALES<br />
>> TAX. *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE DRUG DEALERS and<br />
>> illegals by making their tax free money leaving the country even more<br />
>> valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the RED money for GREEN money then<br />
>> you would charge the sales tax at that point.<br />
>><br />
> Most cash is laundered within the US.</p>
<p>And that will create more steps and a tax to get it out of the country.</p>
<p>>> Have the States Ratify an amendment withdrawing the 16th amendment&#8230;<br />
>> Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (Federal sales<br />
>> tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED TAX* with the same amendment that<br />
>> removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a Federal *NEW ITEM* sales tax.<br />
>><br />
>>          <embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /><br />
><br />
> The income tax used to be simple, too, but lobbyists were paid big bucks<br />
> to make it more complex. A simple income tax and a simple VAT would work<br />
> well and could replace the payroll tax.<br />
></p>
<p>NO&#8230;. VAT, all a VAT will do is make illegal activity more appealing.</p>
<p>>> This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
><br />
> People who are in jail for tax crimes didn&#8217;t accidentally break the law.<br />
> They will break the law for whatever tax they are expected to pay.</p>
<p>Many people are in Jail for Federal income tax laws, how many are in<br />
prison for State Sales tax violations&#8230;.  Does the government come to<br />
my house and take it for a sales tax crime? I pay SALES tax at the cash<br />
register and I&#8217;m done with it for ever.  With income tax it is a paper<br />
and legal nightmare that is over my head for years, there are questions<br />
of deductions and complicated regulations.</p>
<p>>> and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
>> *GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
>> hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add the<br />
>> amendment to it that if congress raises tax by 1% they are forced to cut<br />
>> every single expenditure of the government by 3%.<br />
>><br />
>> Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
>> of our military bases along the southern Border to minimize the amount<br />
>> of border that the Border patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
>> Federal trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
>> military bases.<br />
><br />
> I would love to see the Pentagon have a budget no larger than $200<br />
> billion. As long as we try to run our empire, we won&#8217;t have that happen.<br />
></p>
<p>True</p>
<p>>> This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
>> hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
>> tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
>> benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
>> of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
>> outside the USA. That will make it harder for smugglers to get money out<br />
>> of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
>> tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch smugglers. We<br />
>> are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
>> them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
>> illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
>> giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
>> money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
>> borrow like income tax does.<br />
>><br />
>> This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
>> real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
>> immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
>> be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less welfare and charge them<br />
>> tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
>> them&#8230;&#8230;<br />
>><br />
>> End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.<br />
><br />
> And replace it with what? 80-year-old beggars?</p>
<p>Were old people dieing in the streets in 1925? I&#8217;ve seen pictures of<br />
that time period and have yet to see people stepping over the dieing<br />
elderly littering the streets.</p>
<p>>> Pass an amendment to the constitution that makes all<br />
>> *laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
>> that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
>> years to continue to be maintained in our laws.<br />
><br />
> The senate is far too disfunctional to do that.<br />
></p>
<p>State Ratification.  If congress sees it will happen they will pre-empt<br />
it with their own Legal gibberish to try to peal off some of their<br />
detractors.</p>
<p>>> There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
>> borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process.<br />
><br />
> As long as Republicans think that their 30-year-old voodoo economics<br />
> will work to get elected, they will continue to support<br />
> borrow-and-spend.</p>
<p>That never worked, save and pay you debts always has.</p>
<p>><br />
>> Pass another amendment creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
>> has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
>> either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP CONGRESS FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
>> LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING MONEY.<br />
><br />
> That idea seems to have been abandoned.<br />
><br />
>> To quit filling the jails with people over *social taboos* , we<br />
>> need to take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;social engineer&#8221; businesses or<br />
>> private people by removing the governments tax code.<br />
><br />
> Aside from drugs which are both state and federal over-reaction, most of<br />
> the other unnecessary jailings are state. The Economist has a good<br />
> article on this problem this week.<br />
> <a href="http://www.economist.com/node/16640389" >http://www.economist.com/node/16640389</a><br />
><br />
>> Government needs to spend 10% less every year until they meet the<br />
>> income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
>> *use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
>> force an across the board spending freeze and then across the board cuts<br />
>> on the government spending, to do that we have to include a law in our<br />
>> TAX amendment to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
>> force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
>> tax would result in automatic spending cuts using a baseline of 10% taxes.<br />
><br />
> There are many times that it makes much more sense for the government to<br />
> do something than have private business do it. Knee-jerk opposition to<br />
> taxes is foolish.<br />
></p>
<p>Opposition to taxes is NEVER foolish.</p>
<p>>> And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
>> them fight their own fights. We need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
>> committing, we need fewer police and prisons&#8230;.the above drug and tax<br />
>> plan&#8230;. will reduce police and prison needs by at least that 10% that<br />
>> this plan suggested cutting each year.<br />
>><br />
>> NO welfare to corporations, and cut welfare to private people by 10%<br />
>> each year until it is 10% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
>> in DEEP for a long time.<br />
><br />
> Our welfare programs are quite small.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/obama_budget_11.html" >http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/obama_budget_11.html</a></p>
<p>When you total the SS, Medicare, welfare, medicade, they make up the<br />
Majority of the budget and then you have the &#8220;off the books&#8221; backdoor<br />
type of welfare like the subprime welfare loan program that went<br />
bankrupt and bankrupted Fannie/Freddie.</p>
<p>That was an expensive welfare program 3 or 4 hundred BILLION dollars in<br />
Fannie and Freddie alone so far.  Add in the private non Government<br />
entities that were dragged down by the government entities of Fannie and<br />
Freddie.</p>
<p></gross></then>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/25/red-scares-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Red Scares&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/25/red-scares-5/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/25/red-scares-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 17:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=10243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 7/25/2010 11:50 AM, Dave Head wrote: > On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 08:28:10 -0700 (PDT), Larry G > wrote: > >> &#8220;The SS needs to be phased out. Cutting it suddenly isn&#8217;t possible >> without adversely affecting lots of people. &#8221; >> >> Who is agreeing with you on this? Not the establishment Republicans. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 7/25/2010 11:50 AM, Dave Head wrote:<br />
> On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 08:28:10 -0700 (PDT), Larry G<br />
> <gross .larry<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>gmail.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> &#8220;The SS needs to be phased out.  Cutting it suddenly isn&#8217;t possible<br />
>> without adversely affecting lots of people. &#8221;<br />
>><br />
>> Who is agreeing with you on this? Not the establishment Republicans.<br />
>> Not the Tea Party &#8211; the last POLL of them say 2/3 of them do not want<br />
>> to get rid of SS.<br />
><br />
> I don&#8217;t really give a rip.  We have to do it.<br />
><br />
>> so WHO do you think will champion this?<br />
><br />
> I&#8217;m not so concerned about that.  It is just my opinion.  What I&#8217;m<br />
> concerned about is getting rid of the income tax.  Without doing that,<br />
> we will never see prosperity again.<br />
><br />
>> Do you seriously think that the majority of people in this country are<br />
>> going to elect to Congress and the Presidency someone who says they<br />
>> will phase out SS?<br />
><br />
> Dunno.  Maybe if they are made to understand.<br />
><br />
>> what is Your &#8230; REALISTIC solution here?<br />
><br />
> The realistic solution is to cut the income taxes to zero, thus<br />
> supercharging the economy, and therefore cutting the number of really<br />
> poor people to very small numbers.  When you get to the point where<br />
> everyone has significant money, and starts looking at SS and Medicare<br />
> as a drag on their pocketbook and not as a salvation in their old age<br />
> which they can afford to take care of themselves anyway, then maybe SS<br />
> and Medicare will be repealed.  But the income tax has to die first.<br />
>><br />
>> anyone can blather anti-govt rhetoric but where are the solutions?</p>
<p>*HOW TO ALLOW AMERICA TO SURVIVE*<br />
And give America back to Americans</p>
<p>Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles<br />
commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most<br />
regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and<br />
competition would help us get out of this depression.</p>
<p>End the &#8220;war on drugs&#8221; make them legal(increase competition) and sold<br />
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will<br />
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the<br />
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and<br />
hurt the human trafficking business income also.  Why have illegal<br />
prostitutes when there are so many legal tax paying prostitutes out there?</p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED<br />
money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad.</p>
<p>The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drugs less profitable* as<br />
would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL “NEW ITEM” SALES<br />
TAX. *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE DRUG DEALERS and<br />
illegals by making their tax free money leaving the country even more<br />
valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the RED money for GREEN money then<br />
you would charge the sales tax at that point.</p>
<p>Have the States Ratify an amendment withdrawing the 16th amendment&#8230;<br />
Maybe enact something similar to the <a href="http://fairtax.org" >http://fairtax.org</a> (Federal sales<br />
tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED TAX* with the same amendment that<br />
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a Federal *NEW ITEM* sales tax.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/S7AgwtSzxt8&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for<br />
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote<br />
*GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second<br />
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new.  Then add the<br />
amendment to it that if congress raises tax by 1% they are forced to cut<br />
every single expenditure of the government by 3%.</p>
<p>Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half<br />
of our military bases along the southern Border to minimize the amount<br />
of border that the Border patrol needs to watch, the military and<br />
Federal trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the<br />
military bases.</p>
<p>This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and<br />
hookers and other underground economy&#8217;s by forcing them to have to pay<br />
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the<br />
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff.  There needs to be one type<br />
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use<br />
outside the USA. That will make it harder for smugglers to get money out<br />
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales<br />
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch smugglers. We<br />
are &#8220;right now&#8221; taking money from peoples pay checks before they get<br />
them and at the same time we don&#8217;t tax drug dealers or hookers and<br />
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and<br />
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving<br />
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can<br />
borrow like income tax does.</p>
<p>This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the<br />
real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our<br />
immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will<br />
be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less welfare and charge them<br />
tax and they won&#8217;t be so eager to come here and we won&#8217;t need to chase<br />
them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.</p>
<p>Pass an amendment to the constitution that makes all<br />
*laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires<br />
that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven<br />
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.</p>
<p>There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress&#8217;<br />
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process.</p>
<p>Pass another amendment creating term limits on congress so the House<br />
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in<br />
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP CONGRESS FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS<br />
LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING MONEY.</p>
<p>To quit filling the jails with people over *social taboos* , we<br />
need to take away congress&#8217; ability to &#8220;social engineer&#8221; businesses or<br />
private people by removing the governments tax code.</p>
<p>Government needs to spend 10% less every year until they meet the<br />
income of the government. The best way, is to<br />
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to<br />
force an across the board spending freeze and then across the board cuts<br />
on the government spending, to do that we have to include a law in our<br />
TAX amendment to the constitution that can&#8217;t be easily circumvented, to<br />
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes.  So any<br />
tax would result in automatic spending cuts using a baseline of 10% taxes.</p>
<p>And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let<br />
them fight their own fights. We need fewer crimes for people to be<br />
committing, we need fewer police and prisons&#8230;.the above drug and tax<br />
plan&#8230;. will reduce police and prison needs by at least that 10% that<br />
this plan suggested cutting each year.</p>
<p>NO welfare to corporations, and cut welfare to private people by 10%<br />
each year until it is 10% of today&#8217;s cost. Any way you look at it, we&#8217;re<br />
in DEEP for a long time.</p>
<p></gross></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/25/red-scares-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hussein Calls Illegal aliens&#8221; Displaced foreign Travelers&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/20/hussein-calls-illegal-aliens-displaced-foreign-travelers/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/20/hussein-calls-illegal-aliens-displaced-foreign-travelers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 01:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leftist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=10041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 7/20/2010 9:08 PM, Buzz head wrote: > &#8220;ObamaTard&#8221; wrote in message > news:i24rtk$95t$1 @&#038;*$?%news.eternal-september.org&#8230; >> Is that what they&#8217;re calling them now? >> Tuesday, July 20, 2010 >> >> In the Forest Service&#8217;s news release about the recent string of marijuana >> busts, I discovered a term of art I&#8217;d never encountered before: >> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 7/20/2010 9:08 PM, Buzz head wrote:<br />
> &#8220;ObamaTard&#8221; <obamatard @Aol.com> wrote in message<br />
> news:i24rtk$95t$1<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>news.eternal-september.org&#8230;<br />
>> Is that what they&#8217;re calling them now?<br />
>> Tuesday, July 20, 2010<br />
>><br />
>> In the Forest Service&#8217;s news release about the recent string of marijuana<br />
>> busts, I discovered a term of art I&#8217;d never encountered before:<br />
>><br />
>> During the raid, a U.S. Forest Service K-9 team located Gauldry<br />
>> Almonte-Hernandez, a displaced foreign traveler from Michoacán Mexico,<br />
>> who had tried to flee the area and hide while officers were performing<br />
>> entry into the marijuana garden.<br />
>> &#8220;Displaced foreign traveler&#8221;? Makes it sound like he meant to go to<br />
>> Disneyland, got lost, and ended up at a pot plantation in the woods south<br />
>> of Hayfork.<br />
>> <a href="http://blogs.redding.com/bross/archives/2010/07/is-that-what-th.html" >http://blogs.redding.com/bross/archives/2010/07/is-that-what-th.html</a><br />
><br />
> Would you feel better if Obama stayed the course and said these people are<br />
> doing jobs no American would do?<br />
><br />
> LMAO! You parrots were goose stepping your favorite hate radio hosts just 2<br />
> years ago. Wonder why Texas &#038; Arizona have the highest rate of illegals?<br />
> Now you want Obama to take care of the mess bush created.</p>
<p>Looks to me like the old Republicans are being pushed out, now we need<br />
to push out the Leftist Progressives and we might get the problem fixed.</p>
<p></obamatard></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/20/hussein-calls-illegal-aliens-displaced-foreign-travelers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>to hell with American unemployed, send $500,000,000.00 to Pakistan</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/20/to-hell-with-american-unemployed-send-500000000-00-to-pakistan/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/20/to-hell-with-american-unemployed-send-500000000-00-to-pakistan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=10018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[> The illegals are sending their remittances south too &#8211; all US $&#8230; Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green money outside the USA&#8230;.. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED money would be useless in Mexico since [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> The illegals are sending their remittances south too &#8211; all US $&#8230;</p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
money outside the USA&#8230;..  NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED<br />
money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad.</p>
<p>The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with&#8230;..  that makes Drugs less profitable as<br />
would dropping income tax and installing a NATIONAL &#8220;NEW ITEM&#8221; SALES<br />
TAX.   NOT ANY VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE DRUG DEALERS by making their<br />
tax free money leaving the country even more valuable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/20/to-hell-with-american-unemployed-send-500000000-00-to-pakistan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>a says to hell with American unemployed, send $500,000,000.00 to Pakistan</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/20/a-says-to-hell-with-american-unemployed-send-500000000-00-to-pakistan/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/20/a-says-to-hell-with-american-unemployed-send-500000000-00-to-pakistan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=10008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 7/20/2010 1:45 PM, sillapond wrote: > On 07/19/2010 07:18 PM, Sid9 wrote: >> >> &#8220;JSM&#8221; wrote in message >> news:65f46bc3-645f-45fa-9ec7-f1b916e3a1b2 @&#038;*$?%t5g2000prd.googlegroups.com&#8230; >>> Seems like had a lot of people were held behind the &#8220;Iron Curtain&#8221; for >>> one hell of a long time. >>> they are driving tour buses full of illegals through our [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 7/20/2010 1:45 PM, sillapond wrote:<br />
> On 07/19/2010 07:18 PM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
>><br />
>> &#8220;JSM&#8221; <ekrubmeg @gmail.com> wrote in message<br />
>> news:65f46bc3-645f-45fa-9ec7-f1b916e3a1b2<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>t5g2000prd.googlegroups.com&#8230;<br />
>>> Seems like had a lot of people were held behind the &#8220;Iron Curtain&#8221; for<br />
>>> one hell of a long time.<br />
>>> they are driving tour buses full of illegals through our border<br />
>> .<br />
>> .<br />
>> The buses are heading South.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
><br />
> The illegals are sending their remittances south too &#8211; all US $&#8230;</p>
<p>Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green<br />
money outside the USA&#8230;..  NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and<br />
suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED<br />
money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn&#8217;t accept<br />
it abroad.</p>
<p>The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for<br />
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and<br />
more expensive to deal with&#8230;..  that makes Drugs less profitable as<br />
would dropping income tax and installing a NATIONAL &#8220;NEW ITEM&#8221; SALES<br />
TAX.   NOT ANY VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE DRUG DEALERS by making their<br />
tax free money leaving the country even more valuable.</p>
<p></ekrubmeg></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/20/a-says-to-hell-with-american-unemployed-send-500000000-00-to-pakistan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latin American nations seek blood as America&#8217;s first Black  President seeks to destroy White Americans in Arizona</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/20/latin-american-nations-seek-blood-as-americas-first-black-president-seeks-to-destroy-white-americans-in-arizona-3/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/20/latin-american-nations-seek-blood-as-americas-first-black-president-seeks-to-destroy-white-americans-in-arizona-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=10002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 7/20/2010 12:27 PM, Henry wrote: > brad herschel wrote: >> On Jul 20, 11:24 am, Beam Me Up Scotty > Everyth&#8230;@Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote: >>> On 7/20/2010 8:30 AM, brad herschel wrote: >>> >>>> On Jul 20, 2:31 am, Hisler wrote: >>>>> The Associated Press - >>>>> PHOENIX — >>>>> Seven other Latin American countries want [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 7/20/2010 12:27 PM, Henry wrote:<br />
> brad herschel wrote:<br />
>> On Jul 20, 11:24 am, Beam Me Up Scotty
<then -Destroy-<br />
>> <a href="mailto:Everyth...@Blackhole.NebulaX.com">Everyth&#8230;@Blackhole.NebulaX.com</a>> wrote:<br />
>>> On 7/20/2010 8:30 AM, brad herschel wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>> On Jul 20, 2:31 am, Hisler <his ...@<acronym title="cocks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%s</span></acronym>.net> wrote:<br />
>>>>> The Associated Press -<br />
>>>>> PHOENIX —<br />
>>>>> Seven other Latin American countries want to join Mexico in supporting<br />
>>>>> a lawsuit challenging Arizona&#8217;s immigration enforcement law.<br />
>>>>> Bolivia, Colombia, El Salvador, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Paraguay and<br />
>>>>> Peru filed separate, nearly identical motions to join Mexico&#8217;s legal<br />
>>>>> brief &#8230;<br />
>>> AMENDMENT XI<br />
>>><br />
>>> Passed by Congress March 4, 1794. Ratified February 7, 1795.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Note: Article III, section 2, of the Constitution was modified by<br />
>>> amendment 11.<br />
>>><br />
>>> The Judicial power of the United States *shall not* be construed to<br />
>>> *extend* to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against<br />
>>> *one* *of the United States* by Citizens of another State, or by<br />
>>> Citizens or *Subjects of any Foreign State* .<br />
>><br />
>> I believe the briefs filed by the latinos countries were as &#8220;friends<br />
>> of the Court&#8221;.<br />
>> Still bullshit. If there citizens are so valuable then they should<br />
>> make an effort<br />
>> to entice them home.</p>
<p>Filing in court is a &#8220;Judicial power&#8221;&#8230;..   the courts don&#8217;t have the<br />
power to accept the briefs.</p>
<p>The Mexican Government should show us the visa that was issued by them<br />
for these people to leave their country? SO we know who it is that is in<br />
this suit Arizona is being sued on behalf of?</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t this a question of Federal constitutional power?  Why do the<br />
Mexicans and others have any say in an internal question of<br />
constitutional powers?</p>
<p>This Court Battle isn&#8217;t over racism or profiling or civil rights&#8230;.<br />
Obama filed his suit against Arizona on the lines that it is<br />
unconstitutional for a State to write a law where that power was given<br />
by the constitution to the Federal government.  That has ZERO<br />
relationship to &#8220;racism&#8221;  or racial Profiling since the law being<br />
objected too is a mirror of the Federal law that wasn&#8217;t racist according<br />
to Obama&#8217;s administration.</p>
<p></his></then>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/20/latin-american-nations-seek-blood-as-americas-first-black-president-seeks-to-destroy-white-americans-in-arizona-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latin American nations seek blood as America&#8217;s first Black  President seeks to destroy White Americans in Arizona</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/20/latin-american-nations-seek-blood-as-americas-first-black-president-seeks-to-destroy-white-americans-in-arizona-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/20/latin-american-nations-seek-blood-as-americas-first-black-president-seeks-to-destroy-white-americans-in-arizona-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=9998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 7/20/2010 12:27 PM, Henry wrote: > brad herschel wrote: >> On Jul 20, 11:24 am, Beam Me Up Scotty > Everyth&#8230;@Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote: >>> On 7/20/2010 8:30 AM, brad herschel wrote: >>> >>>> On Jul 20, 2:31 am, Hisler wrote: >>>>> The Associated Press - >>>>> PHOENIX — >>>>> Seven other Latin American countries want [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 7/20/2010 12:27 PM, Henry wrote:<br />
> brad herschel wrote:<br />
>> On Jul 20, 11:24 am, Beam Me Up Scotty
<then -Destroy-<br />
>> <a href="mailto:Everyth...@Blackhole.NebulaX.com">Everyth&#8230;@Blackhole.NebulaX.com</a>> wrote:<br />
>>> On 7/20/2010 8:30 AM, brad herschel wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>> On Jul 20, 2:31 am, Hisler <his ...@<acronym title="cocks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%s</span></acronym>.net> wrote:<br />
>>>>> The Associated Press -<br />
>>>>> PHOENIX —<br />
>>>>> Seven other Latin American countries want to join Mexico in supporting<br />
>>>>> a lawsuit challenging Arizona&#8217;s immigration enforcement law.<br />
>>>>> Bolivia, Colombia, El Salvador, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Paraguay and<br />
>>>>> Peru filed separate, nearly identical motions to join Mexico&#8217;s legal<br />
>>>>> brief &#8230;<br />
>>> AMENDMENT XI<br />
>>><br />
>>> Passed by Congress March 4, 1794. Ratified February 7, 1795.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Note: Article III, section 2, of the Constitution was modified by<br />
>>> amendment 11.<br />
>>><br />
>>> The Judicial power of the United States *shall not* be construed to<br />
>>> *extend* to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against<br />
>>> *one* *of the United States* by Citizens of another State, or by<br />
>>> Citizens or *Subjects of any Foreign State* .<br />
>><br />
>> I believe the briefs filed by the latinos countries were as &#8220;friends<br />
>> of the Court&#8221;.<br />
>> Still bullshit. If there citizens are so valuable then they should<br />
>> make an effort<br />
>> to entice them home.</p>
<p>Filing in court is a &#8220;Judicial power&#8221;&#8230;..   the courts don&#8217;t have the<br />
power to accept the briefs.</p>
<p>The Mexican Government should show us the visa that was issued by them<br />
for these people to leave their country? SO we know who it is that is in<br />
this suit Arizona is being sued on behalf of?</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t this a question of Federal constitutional power?  Why do the<br />
Mexicans and others have any say in an internal question of<br />
constitutional powers?</p>
<p></his></then>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/20/latin-american-nations-seek-blood-as-americas-first-black-president-seeks-to-destroy-white-americans-in-arizona-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latin American nations seek blood as America&#8217;s first Black  President seeks to destroy White Americans in Arizona</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/20/latin-american-nations-seek-blood-as-americas-first-black-president-seeks-to-destroy-white-americans-in-arizona/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/20/latin-american-nations-seek-blood-as-americas-first-black-president-seeks-to-destroy-white-americans-in-arizona/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=9984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 7/20/2010 8:30 AM, brad herschel wrote: > On Jul 20, 2:31 am, Hisler wrote: >> The Associated Press - >> PHOENIX — >> >> Seven other Latin American countries want to join Mexico in supporting >> a lawsuit challenging Arizona&#8217;s immigration enforcement law. >> >> Bolivia, Colombia, El Salvador, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Paraguay and >> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 7/20/2010 8:30 AM, brad herschel wrote:<br />
> On Jul 20, 2:31 am, Hisler <his ...@<acronym title="cocks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%s</span></acronym>.net> wrote:<br />
>> The Associated Press -<br />
>> PHOENIX —<br />
>><br />
>> Seven other Latin American countries want to join Mexico in supporting<br />
>> a lawsuit challenging Arizona&#8217;s immigration enforcement law.<br />
>><br />
>> Bolivia, Colombia, El Salvador, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Paraguay and<br />
>> Peru filed separate, nearly identical motions to join Mexico&#8217;s legal<br />
>> brief &#8230;</p>
<p>AMENDMENT XI</p>
<p>Passed by Congress March 4, 1794. Ratified February 7, 1795.</p>
<p>Note: Article III, section 2, of the Constitution was modified by<br />
amendment 11.</p>
<p>The Judicial power of the United States *shall not* be construed to<br />
*extend* to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against<br />
*one* *of the United States* by Citizens of another State, or by<br />
Citizens or *Subjects of any Foreign State* .</p>
<p></his></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/20/latin-american-nations-seek-blood-as-americas-first-black-president-seeks-to-destroy-white-americans-in-arizona/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chief Obongo at 28% Approval in Arizona&#8230;Now Losing Support Among  Legal Hispanics!</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/19/chief-obongo-at-28-approval-in-arizona-now-losing-support-among-legal-hispanics/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/19/chief-obongo-at-28-approval-in-arizona-now-losing-support-among-legal-hispanics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Socialists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=9962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 7/19/2010 3:09 PM, wolfagain wrote: > Arizona is over 60% of Hispanic heritage&#8230;even loons can figure it > out&#8230;he&#8217;s losing support among LEGAL Hispanics just like almost every > demographic group. Exceptions are Negros and homosexuals where his > holding firm support. Drudge has the details. If Hispanics wanted to live in fear of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 7/19/2010 3:09 PM, wolfagain wrote:<br />
> Arizona is over 60% of Hispanic heritage&#8230;even loons can figure it<br />
> out&#8230;he&#8217;s losing support among LEGAL Hispanics just like almost every<br />
> demographic group. Exceptions are Negros and homosexuals where his<br />
> holding firm support. Drudge has the details.</p>
<p>If Hispanics wanted to live in fear of DRUG smugglers and sit around<br />
with no work, they could have just stayed in Mexico.</p>
<p>It may take them a few minutes to realize that Obama is offering them a<br />
chance to live just like they did in Mexico but do it in Arizona&#8230;.<br />
imagine when they do, Obama will be in hot water&#8230;..</p>
<p>The Obamanista Army of Democrat Union Socialists will walk home.  Their<br />
Health care is a scam,  their jobs aren&#8217;t coming back(says Joe Biden)<br />
and they live in the same fear of DRUG smugglers and assassination as<br />
they did in Mexico&#8230;..  Why stay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/19/chief-obongo-at-28-approval-in-arizona-now-losing-support-among-legal-hispanics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

