<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>OutSourcedNews-Group &#187; Barack Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/barack-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng</link>
	<description>You don&#039;t need to regulate FREEDOM</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:49:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>*Cesar Obama* needs no authority</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/06/cesar-obama-needs-no-authority/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/06/cesar-obama-needs-no-authority/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cesar Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Branch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAIL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WASHINGTON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 2/6/2012 5:57 PM, P&#038;*$?%s wrote: > On 2/6/2012 2:16 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >> Obama is preparing for cold war with Muslims to collapse America, Obama >> pulled out the embassy personnel and seized Iranian assets. Obama will >> drive the final NAIL into the USA coffin, first he stopped the oil pipe >> line [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 2/6/2012 5:57 PM, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym> wrote:<br />
> On 2/6/2012 2:16 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:<br />
>> Obama is preparing for cold war with Muslims to collapse America, Obama<br />
>> pulled out the embassy personnel and seized Iranian assets.  Obama will<br />
>> drive the final <strong>NAIL</strong> into the <strong>USA</strong> coffin, first he stopped the oil pipe<br />
>> line NOW Obama will throw us into an cold war complete with oil<br />
>> shortages.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> ["<strong>WASHINGTON</strong> — U.S. President <strong>Barack Obama</strong> tightened sanctions on <strong>Iran</strong><br />
>> another notch, the <strong>White House</strong> said on Monday, targeting its central<br />
>> bank and giving U.S. banks new powers to freeze assets linked to the<br />
>> government.<br />
>><br />
>> Obama's move, in an executive order he signed Sunday, was the latest<br />
>> action in an escalating campaign to target the Central Bank of <strong>Iran</strong>, and<br />
>> was intended to close loopholes in existing sanctions that Tehran has<br />
>> exploited. In a letter to <strong>Congress</strong>, Obama said Iranian banks were hiding<br />
>> transactions to undercut the financial sanctions the <strong>United States</strong> and<br />
>> other powers have imposed in response to <strong>Iran</strong>'s nuclear program."]<br />
><br />
> Since when do executive orders apply to entities outside of the<br />
> <strong>Executive Branch</strong>?<br />
><br />
> I can find no authority for the executive to delegate or otherwise give<br />
> &#8220;new powers&#8221; to private entities.<br />
><br />
> Does anyone in this country understand the purpose of government?  Can<br />
> no one read what is plain and simple in our <strong>Constitution</strong>?</p>
<p>*<strong>Cesar Obama</strong>* needs no authority, he is allowed to do anything that<br />
violates the constitution that he wants.    Where have you been these<br />
last three years, I hope the coma wasn&#8217;t more than those three years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/06/cesar-obama-needs-no-authority/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama is preparing for cold war</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/06/obama-is-preparing-for-cold-war/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/06/obama-is-preparing-for-cold-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAIL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WASHINGTON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama is preparing for cold war with Muslims to collapse America, Obama pulled out the embassy personnel and seized Iranian assets. Obama will drive the final NAIL into the USA coffin, first he stopped the oil pipe line NOW Obama will throw us into an cold war complete with oil shortages. ["WASHINGTON — U.S. President [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is preparing for cold war with Muslims to collapse America, Obama<br />
pulled out the embassy personnel and seized Iranian assets.  Obama will<br />
drive the final <strong>NAIL</strong> into the <strong>USA</strong> coffin, first he stopped the oil pipe<br />
line NOW Obama will throw us into an cold war complete with oil shortages.</p>
<p>["<strong>WASHINGTON</strong> — U.S. President <strong>Barack Obama</strong> tightened sanctions on <strong>Iran</strong><br />
another notch, the <strong>White House</strong> said on Monday, targeting its central<br />
bank and giving U.S. banks new powers to freeze assets linked to the<br />
government.</p>
<p>Obama's move, in an executive order he signed Sunday, was the latest<br />
action in an escalating campaign to target the Central Bank of <strong>Iran</strong>, and<br />
was intended to close loopholes in existing sanctions that Tehran has<br />
exploited. In a letter to <strong>Congress</strong>, Obama said Iranian banks were hiding<br />
transactions to undercut the financial sanctions the <strong>United States</strong> and<br />
other powers have imposed in response to <strong>Iran</strong>'s nuclear program."]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/06/obama-is-preparing-for-cold-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exposing President&#8217;s Incompetence</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/23/exposing-presidents-incompetence/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/23/exposing-presidents-incompetence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[23]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HEAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Mon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/23/2012 4:21 PM, retrogrouch @&#038;*$?%comcast.net wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:23:54 -0500, No Surrender @&#038;*$?%never.net wrote: > >>FROM YAHOO NEWS >> >> HEAD: Brazil Stiffs Obama on Oil Deal, Exposing President&#8217;s Incompetence >> By Mark Whittington >> >> President Barack Obama has suffered the second embarrassment over oil imports within the space [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>23</strong>/2012 4:21 PM, <a href="mailto:retrogrouch<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>comcast.net">retrogrouch<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>comcast.net</a> wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Mon</strong>, <strong>23</strong> Jan 2012 12:<strong>23</strong>:54 -0500, No <a href="mailto:Surrender<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>never.net">Surrender<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>never.net</a> wrote:<br />
><br />
>>FROM YAHOO <strong>NEWS</strong><br />
>><br />
>> <strong>HEAD</strong>: <strong>Brazil</strong> Stiffs Obama on Oil Deal, Exposing President&#8217;s Incompetence<br />
>> By Mark Whittington<br />
>><br />
>> President <strong>Barack Obama</strong> has suffered the second embarrassment over oil imports within the space of a week. <strong>Brazil</strong>, whose<br />
>> offshore deposits of oil were sought by the Obama administration, has signed contracts with <strong>China</strong> for the product.<br />
><br />
><br />
> Gee I thought we were a capitalist country and it was the oil<br />
> companies job to bid on the oil . . .</p>
<p>That was the old <strong>Capitalism</strong>, the new <strong>Socialism</strong> has that all fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/23/exposing-presidents-incompetence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Europe to ban Iranian oil imports</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/04/europe-to-ban-iranian-oil-imports/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/04/europe-to-ban-iranian-oil-imports/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 21:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=26906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/4/2012 3:53 PM, RichTravsky wrote: > Ref at > > http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/04/us-iran-idUSTRE8031DI20120104 > Exclusive: In major blow, EU agrees embargo on Iranian crude > > European governments have agreed in principle to ban imports of Iranian > oil, EU diplomats said Wednesday, dealing a potentially heavy blow to > Tehran that crowns new Western economic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/4/2012 3:53 PM, RichTravsky wrote:<br />
> Ref at<br />
><br />
>  <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/04/us-iran-idUSTRE8031DI20120104" >http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/04/us-iran-idUSTRE8031DI20120104</a><br />
>  Exclusive: In major blow, <strong>EU</strong> agrees embargo on Iranian crude<br />
><br />
>  European governments have agreed in principle to ban imports of Iranian<br />
>  oil, <strong>EU</strong> diplomats said Wednesday, dealing a potentially heavy blow to<br />
>  Tehran that crowns new Western economic sanctions imposing real pain just<br />
>  months before an Iranian election.<br />
><br />
>  The prospective embargo from the European <strong>Union</strong>, along with tough U.S.<br />
>  financial measures signed into law by President <strong>Barack Obama</strong> on New<br />
>  Year&#8217;s Eve, form a concerted Western campaign to impose sanctions over<br />
>  Iran&#8217;s nuclear program.<br />
>  &#8230;<br />
><br />
> A one two punch!<br />
><br />
> <strong>RT</strong></p>
<p>one == too little<br />
two == too late</p>
<p>Obama and the Socialist are Euro morons are years behind Bush and he was<br />
kind of slow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/04/europe-to-ban-iranian-oil-imports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s hero Hugo Chavez Bitch Slaps Obama&#8217;s Baboon ears off his Fugly face</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/27/obamas-hero-hugo-chavez-bitch-slaps-obamas-baboon-ears-off-his-fugly-face-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/27/obamas-hero-hugo-chavez-bitch-slaps-obamas-baboon-ears-off-his-fugly-face-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 14:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[43]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAMAGGOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCUTARDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chavez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hugo Ch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ixzz1h8HAtHrM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressive Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=26582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 12/27/2011 2:43 AM, Buck wrote: > On Dec 20, 9:31 pm, Ã˜BAMAGGOT Ã˜CCUTARDS < Øbama's S&#038;*$?%t Stain on > Americans @ White House.gov> wrote: >> http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/70694.html >> >> Hugo Chávez blasted President Barack Obama as a &#8220;clown&#8221; and an >> &#8220;embarrassment&#8221; who has turned the United States into a &#8220;disaster&#8221; >> >> Read more:http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/70694.html#ixzz1h8HAtHrM [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 12/27/2011 2:<strong>43</strong> AM, Buck wrote:<br />
> On Dec 20, 9:31 pm, Ã˜<strong>BAMAGGOT</strong>  Ã˜<strong>CCUTARDS</strong> < Øbama's <acronym title="Shit"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> S&*$?%t</span></acronym> Stain on<br />
> Americans  @   White  House.gov> wrote:<br />
>> <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/70694.html" >http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/70694.html</a><br />
>><br />
>> <strong>Hugo Ch</strong>ávez blasted President <strong>Barack Obama</strong> as a &#8220;clown&#8221; and an<br />
>> &#8220;embarrassment&#8221; who has turned the <strong>United States</strong> into a &#8220;disaster&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>> Read more:http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/70694.html#<strong>ixzz1h8HAtHrM</strong><br />
><br />
> I understand that <strong>Chavez</strong> didn&#8217;t like Obama, so why are you saying that<br />
> they are buddies?<br />
><br />
> I mean, that&#8217;s like saying that just because <strong>Canada</strong> allows Cubans and<br />
> Canadians are free to go to <strong>Cuba</strong>, that Conservatives love Communism<br />
> because <strong>Canada</strong> has a Conservative government!<br />
><br />
> I guess that you&#8217;re putting words in my mouth!<br />
><br />
> You <acronym title="fucking"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> f&*$?%g</span></acronym> Commies are all alike!</p>
<p>A Republican Canadian is a Progressive-Republican like John McCain or<br />
even a Progressive-Marxist like Obama.</p>
<p>Why would those <strong>Progressives</strong> show &#8220;character&#8221; and principal, they have none?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/27/obamas-hero-hugo-chavez-bitch-slaps-obamas-baboon-ears-off-his-fugly-face-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>See the racism now giga? It&#8217;s not hard it it? Condemn the racist scum now.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/21/see-the-racism-now-giga-its-not-hard-it-it-condemn-the-racist-scum-now/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/21/see-the-racism-now-giga-its-not-hard-it-it-condemn-the-racist-scum-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 21:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hugo Ch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIGHTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROVE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=26414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 12/21/2011 3:58 PM, Bret Cahill wrote: >>> http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/70694.html >> >>> Hugo Chávez blasted President Barack Obama as a &#8220;clown&#8221; and an >>> &#8220;embarrassment&#8221; who has turned the United States into a &#8220;disaster&#8221; >> >>> Read more:http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/70694.html#ixzz1h8HAtHrM >> >> See the racism now giga? I&#8217;ve removed it from the title line, but you >> can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 12/21/2011 3:58 PM, Bret Cahill wrote:<br />
>>> <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/70694.html" >http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/70694.html</a><br />
>><br />
>>> <strong>Hugo Ch</strong>ávez blasted President <strong>Barack Obama</strong> as a &#8220;clown&#8221; and an<br />
>>> &#8220;embarrassment&#8221; who has turned the <strong>United States</strong> into a &#8220;disaster&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>>> Read more:http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/70694.html<a href='http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/ixzz1h8hathrm/' rel='tag' class="hashtag">#ixzz1h8HAtHrM</a><br />
>><br />
>> See the racism now giga? I&#8217;ve removed it from the title line, but you<br />
>> can still see it.<br />
><br />
> &#8220;Libertarianism&#8221; will always progress to fascism and racial hatred.</p>
<p>Your fantasy falls apart when it comes to the fact that individual<br />
<strong>RIGHTS</strong> are farther from a totalitarian government than a Socialist<br />
government that has already stolen your individual <strong>RIGHTS</strong> and need only<br />
steal a few more of your <strong>RIGHTS</strong> to become a tyrannical and a<br />
totalitarian government that a charismatic leader can then declare<br />
himself the dictator.</p>
<p>Socialism is far more tenuous than is a people with individual <strong>RIGHTS</strong><br />
and the <strong>freedom</strong> of capitalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/21/see-the-racism-now-giga-its-not-hard-it-it-condemn-the-racist-scum-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s hero Hugo Chavez Bitch Slaps Obama&#8217;s Baboon ears off his Fugly face</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/21/obamas-hero-hugo-chavez-bitch-slaps-obamas-baboon-ears-off-his-fugly-face/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/21/obamas-hero-hugo-chavez-bitch-slaps-obamas-baboon-ears-off-his-fugly-face/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 20:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAMAGGOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCUTARDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chavez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=26408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 12/21/2011 8:40 AM, ØBAMAGGOT ØCCUTARDS wrote: > > > &#8220;Rex the Reaper&#8221; wrote in message > news:2c2f1e33-7a68-4a56-bc4b-761abf8d18a6 @&#038;*$?%o9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com&#8230; > > Hugo Chávez blasted President Barack Obama as a &#8220;clown&#8221; and an > &#8220;embarrassment&#8221; who has turned the United States into a &#8220;disaster&#8221; > > Read more: > http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/70694.html#ixzz1h8HAtHrM Is it worse when a MORON [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 12/21/2011 8:40 AM, Ø<strong>BAMAGGOT</strong>  Ø<strong>CCUTARDS</strong> wrote:<br />
><br />
><br />
> &#8220;Rex the Reaper&#8221; <natjackm92us @yahoo.com> wrote in message<br />
> news:2c2f1e33-7a68-4a56-bc4b-761abf8d18a6<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>o9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com&#8230;<br />
><br />
> Hugo Chávez blasted President <strong>Barack Obama</strong> as a &#8220;clown&#8221; and an<br />
> &#8220;embarrassment&#8221; who has turned the <strong>United States</strong> into a &#8220;disaster&#8221;<br />
><br />
> Read more:<br />
> <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/70694.html#ixzz1h8HAtHrM" >http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/70694.html#ixzz1h8HAtHrM</a></p>
<p>Is it worse when a MORON like <strong>Chavez</strong> call you a clown, or is it just funny?</p>
<p>People here smarter than Hugo <strong>Chavez</strong> have been calling Obama a clown for<br />
all 3 years.</p>
<p></natjackm92us></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/21/obamas-hero-hugo-chavez-bitch-slaps-obamas-baboon-ears-off-his-fugly-face/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polls come to the conclusion of those that are paying for the poll.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/21/polls-come-to-the-conclusion-of-those-that-are-paying-for-the-poll/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/21/polls-come-to-the-conclusion-of-those-that-are-paying-for-the-poll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 16:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ORC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=26370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 12/20/2011 5:32 PM, Sid9 wrote: > President Barack Obama now holds a lead over potential Republican > presidential rivals in a CNN/ORC International Poll released Tuesday. Polls come to the conclusion of those that are paying for the poll. And by the way, this is NOT an international election. > If the election were [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 12/20/2011 5:32 PM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
> President <strong>Barack Obama</strong> now holds a lead over potential Republican<br />
> presidential rivals in a <strong>CNN</strong>/<strong>ORC</strong> <strong>International Poll</strong> released Tuesday.</p>
<p>Polls come to the conclusion of those that are paying for the poll.</p>
<p>And by the way, this is NOT an international election.</p>
<p>> If the election were held today,</p>
<p>We would NOT need a phony poll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/21/polls-come-to-the-conclusion-of-those-that-are-paying-for-the-poll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Administration Officials Cite Drop in Homelessness  Among Veterans</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/17/obama-administration-officials-cite-drop-in-homelessness-among-veterans/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/17/obama-administration-officials-cite-drop-in-homelessness-among-veterans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 20:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[increased]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marxist Professor Comrades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle-East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WASHINGTON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=26186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 12/17/2011 3:19 PM, Sid9 wrote: > > &#8220;NaturalBornCitizen&#8221; wrote in message > news:4eecf096$0$1100$afc38c87 @&#038;*$?%read01.usenet4all.se&#8230; >> On 12/17/2011 1:35 PM, Sid9 wrote: >>> >>> &#8220;NaturalBornCitizen&#8221; wrote in message >>> news:4eecb5d8$0$1100$afc38c87 @&#038;*$?%read01.usenet4all.se&#8230; >>>> On 12/17/2011 12:40 AM, RichTravsky wrote: >>>>> NaturalBornCitizen wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 12/14/2011 8:54 AM, Sid9 wrote: >>>>>>> &#8220;NaturalBornCitizen&#8221; wrote in message >>>>>>>> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 12/17/2011 3:19 PM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
><br />
> &#8220;NaturalBornCitizen&#8221; <n @t.invalid> wrote in message<br />
> news:4eecf096$0$1100$afc38c87<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>read01.usenet4all.se&#8230;<br />
>> On 12/17/2011 1:35 PM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>> &#8220;NaturalBornCitizen&#8221; </n><n @t.invalid> wrote in message<br />
>>> news:4eecb5d8$0$1100$afc38c87<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>read01.usenet4all.se&#8230;<br />
>>>> On 12/17/2011 12:40 AM, RichTravsky wrote:<br />
>>>>> NaturalBornCitizen wrote:<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> On 12/14/2011 8:54 AM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> &#8220;NaturalBornCitizen&#8221;</n><n @t.invalid> wrote in message<br />
>>>>>>>> On 12/13/2011 9:01 AM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>> Officials Cite Drop in Homelessness Among Veterans<br />
>>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> <strong>WASHINGTON</strong> (<strong>AP</strong>) &#8211; Homelessness among the nation&#8217;s veterans<br />
>>>>>>>>> declined by<br />
>>>>>>>>> about<br />
>>>>>>>>> 12 percent during a one-year period ending January 2011, the Obama<br />
>>>>>>>>> administration says.<br />
>>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> Officials said the drop is a sign of progress and that the<br />
>>>>>>>>> administration<br />
>>>>>>>>> is<br />
>>>>>>>>> on track for reaching President <strong>Barack Obama</strong>&#8216;s goal of eliminating<br />
>>>>>>>>> homelessness among veterans by 2015.<br />
>>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> In all, there are nearly 67,500 homeless veterans, according to a<br />
>>>>>>>>> survey<br />
>>>>>>>>> that thousands of communities around the country help to<br />
>>>>>>>>> administer each<br />
>>>>>>>>> January. More than 76,000 homeless vets were counted in the prior<br />
>>>>>>>>> year&#8217;s<br />
>>>>>>>>> survey.<br />
>>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan attributed<br />
>>>>>>>>> much of<br />
>>>>>>>>> the<br />
>>>>>>>>> drop to getting more veterans to participate in a voucher program<br />
>>>>>>>>> that<br />
>>>>>>>>> greatly subsidizes their housing costs. While Congress has<br />
>>>>>>>>> regularly<br />
>>>>>>>>> <strong>increased</strong> funding for the voucher program, thousands of veterans<br />
>>>>>>>>> were not<br />
>>>>>>>>> taking advantage of the help.<br />
>>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> &#8220;At the time we came into office in 2009, even though we had<br />
>>>>>>>>> about 20,000<br />
>>>>>>>>> of<br />
>>>>>>>>> those vouchers available; fewer than 5,000 veterans were actually<br />
>>>>>>>>> using<br />
>>>>>>>>> them<br />
>>>>>>>>> and had successfully moved from the streets or shelters into<br />
>>>>>>>>> permanent<br />
>>>>>>>>> housing,&#8221; Donovan said.<br />
>>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> Officials said they were particularly encouraged with the results<br />
>>>>>>>>> given<br />
>>>>>>>>> that<br />
>>>>>>>>> the drop occurred during a sluggish economy still shaking off the<br />
>>>>>>>>> effects<br />
>>>>>>>>> of<br />
>>>>>>>>> a deep recession.<br />
>>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> Officials also said that there has been more emphasis on reaching<br />
>>>>>>>>> out to<br />
>>>>>>>>> veterans and families at risk of becoming homeless. Veterans<br />
>>>>>>>>> Affairs<br />
>>>>>>>>> Secretary Eric Shinseki said that $100 million in grants will be<br />
>>>>>>>>> made<br />
>>>>>>>>> available over the coming year to help prevent veterans from<br />
>>>>>>>>> becoming<br />
>>>>>>>>> homeless or to quickly return them to stable housing.<br />
>>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> &#8220;The problems that lead to homelessness begin long before<br />
>>>>>>>>> veterans and<br />
>>>>>>>>> their<br />
>>>>>>>>> families are on the streets,&#8221; Shinseki said.<br />
>>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> Veterans are about 50 percent more likely to be homeless than the<br />
>>>>>>>>> average<br />
>>>>>>>>> American.<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> it will go up now that Obama has lost the war in <strong>Iraq</strong> and all the<br />
>>>>>>>> peeps<br />
>>>>>>>> are coming home to no jobs in the Obamanation.<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> The <strong>Iraq</strong> war?<br />
>>>>>>> The unnecessary war?<br />
>>>>>>> The unfunded war?<br />
>>>>>>> The war run by borrowing every cent to pay for it?<br />
>>>>>>> The war based on Republican incompetent bush,jr&#8217;s whim?<br />
>>>>>>> The war that harmed American interests by wiping out <strong>Iran</strong>&#8216;s worst<br />
>>>>>>> nightmare<br />
>>>>>>> in the region?<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> That war?<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> The war that will increase <strong>VA</strong> expenses for the next 60 years?<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> That war?<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> no.<br />
>>>>>> the one that brought <strong>freedom</strong> and democracy to the <strong>middle east</strong> and<br />
>>>>>> spawned the arab spring.<br />
>>>>>> the one that the congress approved and funded.<br />
>>>>>> that war.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> You mean the one started y lies about WMDs&#8230;<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> these <strong>WMD</strong>&#8216;S<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> <a href="http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=15918" >http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=15918</a><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> appears you are the liar.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> how&#8217;s that closing Gitmo and trying the terrorists in <strong>NY</strong> working out<br />
>>>> for you?<br />
>>><br />
>>> You are a liar.<br />
>>> Saddam had been neutered by the first Gulf war.<br />
>>> bush,jr and the <strong>CIA</strong> HAD to know it because half the world knew it.<br />
>>> Saddam blustered about weapons just to stay alive in his own country.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Then Republican bush,jr, <acronym title="asshole"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> a&*$?%e</span></acronym> that he is, invaded <strong>Iraq</strong> and wiped out<br />
>>> <strong>Iran</strong>&#8216;s most formidable enemy in the region.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Some <acronym title="fucking"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> f&*$?%g</span></acronym> genius was bush,jr!<br />
>>><br />
>>> Then he wrecked our economy and left the mess for Obama to clean up.<br />
>><br />
>> Bush started the community development act that morfed into the fannie<br />
>> freddie debacle?<br />
>> sid you are one cornfused puppy.<br />
>><br />
><br />
> All trivial bullshit compared to the deregulation that started with St<br />
> <strong>Reagan</strong>, continued under the two Bush&#8217;s.<br />
> Then the uncalled for tax cut&#8230;bad economics<br />
> Followed by an underfunded prescription plan and&#8230;then</p>
<p>Obama and <strong>Democrats</strong> spent like drunken sailors,  and we were already<br />
running deficits.   So taking a budget that was running deficits and<br />
spending more, was the dumbest thing in history.</p>
<p>> A war based on lies and stupidity&#8230;totally unfunded that harmed<br />
> American interests against <strong>Iran</strong>.</p>
<p>You mean the Libyan war that Obama started and then paid <strong>NATO</strong> to finish?</p>
<p>> How dumb did bush,jr have to be??<br />
></p>
<p>Well, he was almost as dumb as Obama.</p>
<p>> Now we fight a do nothing congress that has only one objective and it&#8217;s<br />
> not the <strong>welfare</strong> of the American people&#8230;.</p>
<p>They are NOT supposed to pay the bills of the American people or the States.</p>
<p>> it&#8217;s to defeat Obama with the<br />
> seven dwarfs&#8230;.</p>
<p>I have never seen a more unqualified incompetent bunch,<br />
> ever!</p>
<p>You mean Obama and his <strong>Marxist Professor Comrades</strong> that mucked up the the<br />
mess and turned a recession into a depression that has gone from 2 years<br />
to at least 20 years of this Socialist economic morass.</p>
<p></n></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/17/obama-administration-officials-cite-drop-in-homelessness-among-veterans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cheap Ass Obama only gives 50 Mil to AIDS  on World Aids Day</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/01/cheap-ass-obama-only-gives-50-mil-to-aids-on-world-aids-day/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/01/cheap-ass-obama-only-gives-50-mil-to-aids-on-world-aids-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 19:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAMAGGOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OCCUTARDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WASHINGTON]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=25464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 12/1/2011 1:47 PM, ØBAMAGGOT OCCUTARDS wrote: > http://news.yahoo.com/obama-announcing-steps-combat-aids-132713908.html > > WASHINGTON (AP) &#8211; President Barack Obama is renewing the U.S. commitment > to ending HIV and AIDS on Thursday, setting goals for getting more > people access to life-saving AIDS drugs and boosting spending on > treatment of the virus in the U.S. by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 12/1/2011 1:47 PM, Ø<strong>BAMAGGOT</strong> <strong>OCCUTARDS</strong> wrote:<br />
> <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/obama-announcing-steps-combat-aids-132713908.html" >http://news.yahoo.com/obama-announcing-steps-combat-aids-132713908.html</a><br />
><br />
> <strong>WASHINGTON</strong> (<strong>AP</strong>) &#8211; President <strong>Barack Obama</strong> is renewing the U.S. commitment<br />
> to ending <strong>HIV</strong> and <strong>AIDS</strong> on Thursday, setting goals for getting more<br />
> people access to life-saving <strong>AIDS</strong> drugs and boosting spending on<br />
> treatment of the virus in the U.S. by $50 million dollars.</p>
<p>Occupy WallStreet <strong>Socialists</strong> are having sex and doing drugs for<br />
recreation&#8230;..</p>
<p>but the 1% are paying for and working on solving the <strong>AIDS</strong> problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/12/01/cheap-ass-obama-only-gives-50-mil-to-aids-on-world-aids-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No hiring until 2012&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/28/no-hiring-until-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/28/no-hiring-until-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Looman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neal Boortz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Company Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=25318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 11/28/2011 10:40 AM, Marc954 @&#038;*$?%aol.com wrote: > On Nov 28, 9:34 am, Neal Boortz wrote: >> … when Barack Obama is officially Former President Barack Obama. That is >> the plan for at least one small business man in Georgia. Bill Looman of >> west Georgia posted a sign on his company’s trucks: &#8220;New [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On <strong>11</strong>/28/2011 <strong>10</strong>:40 AM, <a href="mailto:Marc954<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>aol.com">Marc954<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>aol.com</a> wrote:<br />
> On Nov 28, 9:34 am, <strong>Neal Boortz</strong> <boo ...@WSB.com> wrote:<br />
>> … when <strong>Barack Obama</strong> is officially Former President <strong>Barack Obama</strong>.  That is<br />
>> the plan for at least one small business man in <strong>Georgia</strong>.  <strong>Bill Looman</strong> of<br />
>> west <strong>Georgia</strong> posted a sign on his company’s trucks: &#8220;<strong>New Company Policy</strong>:<br />
>> We are not hiring until Obama is gone.&#8221;<br />
><br />
><br />
>          The <strong>unemployed</strong> cannot wait until January 20, 2017, they need<br />
> jobs now.</p>
<p>They voted for those jobs to disappear when they voted for Obama.   Now<br />
they have a chance to vote for the jobs to come back.  They will have to<br />
wait until January 20, 2013 to see real hope.</p>
<p></boo></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/28/no-hiring-until-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Blocks New Oil Drilling to Keep Oil Prices High</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/27/obama-blocks-new-oil-drilling-to-keep-oil-prices-high/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/27/obama-blocks-new-oil-drilling-to-keep-oil-prices-high/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 19:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAMAGGOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe Staff Drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OCCUPIERS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=25278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 11/26/2011 7:09 PM, ØBAMAGGOT OCCUPIERS wrote: > > > wrote in message > news:Xns9FA9C18552C3Edds @&#038;*$?%88.198.244.100&#8230; > > http://www.boston.com/lifestyle/green/greenblog/2008/06/obama_on_oil_drilling_not_a_lo.html > > > Obama on oil drilling: &#8216;Not a long-term solution&#8217; > Globe Staff > > Drilling for oil off the US coast has the support of John McCain and > President Bush, but not Barack [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On <strong>11</strong>/26/2011 7:09 PM, Ø<strong>BAMAGGOT</strong> <strong>OCCUPIERS</strong> wrote:<br />
><br />
><br />
> <kenny58 @excite.com> wrote in message<br />
> news:Xns9FA9C18552C3Edds<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>88.198.244.100&#8230;<br />
><br />
> <a href="http://www.boston.com/lifestyle/green/greenblog/2008/06/obama_on_oil_drilling_not_a_lo.html" >http://www.boston.com/lifestyle/green/greenblog/2008/06/obama_on_oil_drilling_not_a_lo.html</a><br />
><br />
><br />
> Obama on oil drilling: &#8216;Not a long-term solution&#8217;<br />
> Globe Staff<br />
><br />
> Drilling for oil off the <strong>US</strong> coast has the support of John McCain and<br />
> President Bush, but not <strong>Barack Obama</strong>.<br />
><br />
> This is not something that&#8217;s going to give consumers short-term relief<br />
> and it is not a long-term solution to our problems with fossil fuels<br />
> generally and oil in particular,&#8221; Obama said</p>
<p>Yet it&#8217;s a short term and long term solution for <strong>Brazil</strong>?</p>
<p>So much so that Obama gave them Billions of dollars of our <strong>money</strong> that we<br />
don&#8217;t have?</p>
<p>There seems to be some holes in your story.</p>
<p></kenny58></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/27/obama-blocks-new-oil-drilling-to-keep-oil-prices-high/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Øbama Collapses in Battleground State Polls</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/09/%c3%b8bama-collapses-in-battleground-state-polls/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/09/%c3%b8bama-collapses-in-battleground-state-polls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 20:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[37]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=24515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 11/9/2011 3:00 PM, Sid9 wrote: > > &#8220;David Johnston&#8221; wrote in message > news:j9ehtq$13k$5 @&#038;*$?%dont-email.me&#8230; >> >>>> By Paul Scicchitano >>>> >>>> More ways to share&#8230; Mixx Stumbled LinkedIn Vine Buzzflash Reddit >>>> Delicious Newstrust Technocrati Share: More . . . A A &#124; Email Us &#124; >>>> Print &#124; Forward Article 0 >>>> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On <strong>11</strong>/9/2011 3:00 PM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
><br />
> &#8220;<strong>David</strong> Johnston&#8221; <david @block.net> wrote in message<br />
> news:j9ehtq$13k$5<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>dont-email.me&#8230;<br />
>><br />
>>>> By Paul Scicchitano<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> More ways to <strong>share</strong>&#8230; Mixx Stumbled LinkedIn Vine Buzzflash Reddit<br />
>>>> Delicious Newstrust Technocrati Share: More . . . A A | Email Us |<br />
>>>> Print | Forward Article 0<br />
>>>> inShare inShare0 If a dozen swing states really do hold the keys to<br />
>>>> the <strong>White House</strong>, a new <strong>USA</strong> Today and Gallup poll finds that voters in<br />
>>>> those states may be a tough sell on a second term for <strong>President Barack</strong><br />
>>>> Obama.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> The debut Swing States survey reveals that voters in the so-called<br />
>>>> battleground states overwhelmingly report &#8211; by a margin of 60 to <strong>37</strong><br />
>>>> percent &#8211; that they and their families aren&#8217;t better off than they<br />
>>>> were before Obama was elected three years ago.<br />
>><br />
>> You know, that doesn&#8217;t actually say anything about Obama&#8217;s support in<br />
>> those states.<br />
><br />
> Put a face on Obama&#8217;s opponent, they lose.</p>
<p>Contrast it with Obama and his face, and <strong>Socialism</strong> loses.</p>
<p></david></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/09/%c3%b8bama-collapses-in-battleground-state-polls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Greedy Bloodsucking Union</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/04/another-greedy-bloodsucking-union/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/04/another-greedy-bloodsucking-union/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 00:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barry Soetoro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HEATH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indonesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RECORDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=24303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 11/4/2011 8:07 PM, Padraigh ProAmerica wrote: > Barack Obama Jr. is the son of a Kenyan muslim and his American wife, > and almost certainly born in Hawii. > > His mother later married an Indonesian named Soetoro, who adopted > Barack. > > This is where it gets tricky. Indonesia does not recognize [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On <strong>11</strong>/4/2011 8:07 PM, Padraigh ProAmerica wrote:<br />
> <strong>Barack Obama</strong> Jr. is the son of a Kenyan muslim and his American wife,<br />
> and almost certainly born in Hawii.<br />
><br />
> His mother later married an Indonesian named Soetoro, who adopted<br />
> Barack.<br />
><br />
> This is where it gets tricky. Indonesia does not recognize dual<br />
> citizenship. His adoption made young <strong>Barry Soetoro</strong> an Indonesian<br />
> citizen. It is quite possible that Obama is not legally President, since<br />
> he is legally NOT an American citizen.</p>
<p>Barry was too young to legally renounce his citizenship, but can his<br />
parents do that for him?</p>
<p>The <strong>USA</strong> allows dual citizenship, If he or they renounced it and Obama<br />
became <strong>Barry Soetoro</strong> is Obama able to still call himself a U.S. &#8220;citizen&#8221;.</p>
<p>How did Obama pay for College, was it as a U.S. citizen or as a foreign<br />
student?</p>
<p>Obama hide his college records and yet he wants to see your <strong>HEATH</strong><br />
<strong>RECORDS</strong>.    What a <strong>POS</strong> hypocrite!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/11/04/another-greedy-bloodsucking-union/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Long, Steep Drop for Americans&#8217; Standard of Living</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/10/19/a-long-steep-drop-for-americans-standard-of-living/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/10/19/a-long-steep-drop-for-americans-standard-of-living/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barak Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Helms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEPRESSION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=23737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 10/19/2011 8:26 PM, Christopher Helms wrote: > On Oct 19, 6:38 pm, Barack-Ã˜lypse Now < Øbama's - Debacle @ > Whitehouse.org> wrote: >> A Long, Steep Drop for Americans&#8217; Standard of Livinghttp://www.cnbc.com/id/44962589 >> >> Think life is not as good as it used to be, at least in terms of your >> wallet? You&#8217;d [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On <strong>10</strong>/19/2011 8:26 PM, <strong>Christopher Helms</strong> wrote:<br />
> On Oct 19, 6:38 pm, Barack-Ã˜lypse Now < Øbama's - Debacle @<br />
> Whitehouse.org> wrote:<br />
>> A Long, Steep Drop for Americans&#8217; Standard of <a href="Livinghttp://www.cnbc.com/id/44962589" >Livinghttp://www.cnbc.com/id/44962589</a><br />
>><br />
>> Think life is not as good as it used to be, at least in terms of your<br />
>> wallet? You&#8217;d be right about that. The standard of living for Americans has<br />
>> fallen longer and more steeply over the past three years than at any time<br />
>> since the <strong>US</strong> government began recording it five decades ago.<br />
>><br />
>> Bottom line: The average individual now has $1,315 less in disposable income<br />
>> than he or she did three years ago at the onset of the <strong>Great Recession</strong><br />
><br />
><br />
> <strong>Barack Obama</strong> was not president at the onset of the Second Great<br />
> Depression.</p>
<p><strong>Barak Obama</strong> missed the onset of &#8220;recession&#8221;  then promptly created the<br />
<strong>DEPRESSION</strong> by expressing and enacting his policies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/10/19/a-long-steep-drop-for-americans-standard-of-living/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Teamster Labor Leader Hoffa Threatens Mob Violence Against Tea Party</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/09/06/us-teamster-labor-leader-hoffa-threatens-mob-violence-against-tea-party/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/09/06/us-teamster-labor-leader-hoffa-threatens-mob-violence-against-tea-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clyde Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat Teamster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Hoffa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=23326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 9/6/2011 12:45 PM, Bible Studies with Satan wrote: > Clyde Armstrong wrote: > >> In a warm-up speech for Barack Obama, Democrat Teamster leader ant >> thug, Jimmy Hoffa, > > Let&#8217;s roll! I&#8217;d love nothing more than for the unions to get violent again. Time > to bust up some millionaires! Where will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 9/6/2011 12:45 PM, Bible Studies with Satan wrote:<br />
> <strong>Clyde Armstrong</strong> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> In a warm-up speech for <strong>Barack Obama</strong>, <strong>Democrat Teamster</strong> leader ant<br />
>> thug,  <strong>Jimmy Hoffa</strong>,<br />
><br />
> Let&#8217;s roll! I&#8217;d love nothing more than for the unions to get violent again. Time<br />
> to bust up some millionaires!</p>
<p>Where will you get a job tomorrow, after you chase the millionaires out<br />
of the country with your hate and <strong>violence</strong>?</p>
<p>What business can you work at that costs less than a million to start?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/09/06/us-teamster-labor-leader-hoffa-threatens-mob-violence-against-tea-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just how low can they go?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/09/03/just-how-low-can-they-go/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/09/03/just-how-low-can-they-go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 18:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gunner Asch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PREDATOR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEXUAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialist #]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=23208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 9/3/2011 11:45 AM, Old Pif wrote: > On Sep 3, 9:54 am, Gunner Asch wrote: > >> &#8220;The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry >> capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency. >> > > The citizenry had been able to elect Bush twice. God knows what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 9/3/2011 <strong>11</strong>:45 AM, Old Pif wrote:<br />
> On Sep 3, 9:54 am, <strong>Gunner Asch</strong> <gunnera ...@gmail.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> &#8220;The danger to America is not <strong>Barack Obama</strong> but a citizenry<br />
>>  capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency.<br />
>><br />
><br />
> The citizenry had been able to elect Bush twice. God knows what is<br />
> ahead.</p>
<p>After <strong>Clinton</strong> the &#8220;sexual predator&#8221; was re-elected, it was obvious that<br />
anything is possible.</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve even elected a <strong>SOCIALIST</strong>&#8230;.</p>
<p><strong>SEXUAL</strong> <strong>PREDATOR</strong> to <strong>SOCIALIST</strong> in 8 years.   Democrats should be proud of<br />
what they have become. Just how low can they go?</p>
<p></gunnera></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/09/03/just-how-low-can-they-go/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear Mr. President,</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/08/13/dear-mr-president/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/08/13/dear-mr-president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 17:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Dream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dear Mr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drudge Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hussein Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment Advisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laffer Curve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moscow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Porter Stansberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=23162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[["""[Below: See Letter from Porter Stansberry to Obama: ‘We simply can’t afford this nonsense anymore…’ Saturday, April 23, 2011 In honor of Monday’s national Tax Day, I wrote the following letter to Mr. Barack Hussein Obama. Please feel free to pass this around if you like it… Dear Mr. President, Welcome to the ashbin of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>["""[Below: See Letter from <strong>Porter Stansberry</strong> to Obama: ‘We simply can’t<br />
afford this nonsense anymore…’</p>
<p>Saturday, April <strong>23</strong>, 2011</p>
<p>In honor of Monday’s national <strong>Tax Day</strong>, I wrote the following letter to<br />
Mr. Barack <strong>Hussein Obama</strong>. Please feel free to pass this around if you<br />
like it…</p>
<p><strong>Dear Mr</strong>. President,</p>
<p>Welcome to the ashbin of society.</p>
<p>With the speech you gave last week, you have firmly and permanently put<br />
yourself in the same garbage bag as all the other communists and<br />
socialists of the 20th century.</p>
<p>Your speech sounded like the faint echo of a speech Lenin gave in an icy<br />
square in <strong>Moscow</strong> 100 years ago.</p>
<p>The promises you made, Mr. President, about the government giving people<br />
things they can’t provide for themselves – a better income, reliable<br />
health care, an advanced education, cheaper <strong>mortgages</strong>, a “shiny, happy”<br />
life – have been made time and time again… sometimes by speakers even<br />
better than you.</p>
<p>And they have always been lies.</p>
<p>While the government can <strong>demand</strong> obedience (and <strong>taxes</strong>), it can’t mandate<br />
dedication, creativity, or innovation. The fact is, the government<br />
itself is nothing more (or less) than the organized ambitions of the people.</p>
<p>Promising something to the people that they don’t already have is a<br />
logical absurdity. And therein lies the timeless flaw of all<br />
collectivist theory: Governments cannot deliver benefits to the people<br />
that the people cannot deliver to themselves.</p>
<p>To demonstrate this truth, consider this example… Governments cannot<br />
simply mandate higher tax revenue. Any substantial increase to tax rates<br />
will reduce total collections, an economic phenomenon known as the<br />
“<strong>Laffer Curve</strong>.”</p>
<p>This has been proven countless times in our country and many others. Any<br />
sensible person will immediately understand why. Taxes are a<br />
disincentive. The higher the marginal rate of tax, the more powerful its<br />
impact.</p>
<p>That’s why, over many decades (and many different tax structures), U.S.<br />
tax revenues have been remarkably stable at around 20% of <strong>GDP</strong>. That’s<br />
why, as you surely know, Mr. President, changing the tax code will not<br />
result in increased tax revenue.</p>
<p>Taxing only the rich simply doesn’t work. It never has. And it never<br />
will. To increase the government’s revenues, we must first increase the<br />
size of the economy. The government cannot tax what the economy doesn’t<br />
produce.</p>
<p>In another time, most Americans might have simply ignored your speech as<br />
the ignorant remarks of yet another handsome, Ivy League-educated,<br />
dilettante president. But at this point in our history, my bet is people<br />
are going to take you far more seriously than you expect. In fact, I<br />
think you’re going to get what you deserve – the trash heap. Why will<br />
Americans turn on you so rapidly and so completely?</p>
<p>Two things have changed – forever – about American politics.</p>
<p>The first is the media and access to critical information. It’s no<br />
longer possible for a president’s administration to control what people<br />
read, see, and think by simply managing the evening news broadcasts.</p>
<p>Thus, all your lies are now exposed almost instantly and broadcast to<br />
millions of people via websites and services like the <strong>Drudge Report</strong>,<br />
Twitter, and Facebook. Socialism cannot possibly survive over any long<br />
period of time in a society with a free media – because socialism is<br />
based on a lie. Facebook means the “half-life” of socialism is now weeks<br />
instead of years.</p>
<p>Even mainstream publications like the <strong>Wall Street</strong> Journal have called<br />
you a liar recently. They have no choice. Your lies were broadcast to<br />
the entire world long before their op-ed pieces appeared.</p>
<p>Your advisors told you none of these “bloggers” mattered. All you had to<br />
do was promise more benefits to more voters and then force fewer voters<br />
to pay for it all. I’m sure you did the political calculus… You believed<br />
your <strong>power</strong> to bribe and bamboozle the poor and the ignorant was stronger<br />
than the resentment you’d engender among the “rich.” And I must admit…<br />
since at least World <strong>War</strong> II, that’s been a safe bet in American politics.</p>
<p>But you forgot one critical factor: We simply can’t afford this nonsense<br />
anymore…</p>
<p>Immediately after your speech, the price of silver went from $39 to a<br />
new high above $42. Gold went up, too.</p>
<p>These are signs, Mr. President, that the world is losing confidence in<br />
our currency. If our foreign creditors were to call in our debts,<br />
America would suffer an economic cataclysm unlike anything we’ve ever<br />
seen in our entire history.</p>
<p>Americans now owe a total of $56 trillion. Without the Fed’s<br />
<strong>money</strong>-printing, it’s unlikely we could afford even the interest on these<br />
existing debts… much less the $1.5 trillion or more in debt you continue<br />
to rack up year after year by promising benefits we haven’t earned.</p>
<p>Sooner or later, our foreign creditors are going to decide our<br />
<strong>money</strong>-printing amounts to a default, and they will stop buying our<br />
bonds. On that day, everyone who trusts you, everyone who believes in<br />
your lies, will be wiped out.</p>
<p>But that won’t be as many people as you expect.</p>
<p>Almost every American knows in his <strong>heart</strong> what made this country great<br />
for the 200 years between 1776 and 1976. It wasn’t the lies of our<br />
presidents. It wasn’t our ability to print <strong>money</strong> and rip off our Chinese<br />
creditors. It wasn’t the modern crybaby mentality of our school system<br />
or our unions. It wasn’t the baby boomer’s dream of a 40-year retirement<br />
with free prescription drugs.</p>
<p>And it sure as hell wasn’t a suave, made-for-TV version of Karl Marx<br />
promising everything to everyone, but with no way to pay for it.</p>
<p>No. What built America was her people’s unwavering faith that they were<br />
free to enjoy the rewards of their accomplishments.</p>
<p>As our country tumbles into bankruptcy and crisis, the people are going<br />
to want their prosperity back, Mr. President. And deep down, they all<br />
know… even your most fervent supporters know… you don’t have the goods.<br />
You don’t have the foggiest idea of how to deliver prosperity to America<br />
because, really, you don’t understand what America is all about.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p><strong>Porter Stansberry</strong><br />
Stansberry’s <strong>Investment Advisory</strong></p>
<p>With today’s essay, I am announcing my complete support for “the rich”<br />
– the class of people Mr. Obama and his ilk castigate at every<br />
opportunity. Ironically, it is these same people Obama expects to line<br />
up like sheep waiting to be sheared. My best advice? Don’t get in that line.</p>
<p>Despite what Mr. Obama and his vast team of lawyer buddies, career<br />
academics, and professional bureaucrats believe, most “rich” people in<br />
America got that way by working hard for a long time. They got that way<br />
by taking risks, educating themselves, starting small businesses, and<br />
selling valuable services or products to their fellow citizens. They<br />
didn’t inherit their wealth. They didn’t rip anyone off. They didn’t buy<br />
political favors from people like <strong>Barack Obama</strong>.</p>
<p>They got that way by working hard to achieve the original American<br />
Dream… not Obama’s new “progressive” <strong>American Dream</strong>, where everyone can<br />
live at the expense of his neighbor. That’s why Obama’s grandstanding<br />
must be viewed in a new way. We need to realize when Obama vilifies the<br />
“rich,” he is vilifying the “achievers.”</p>
<p>And keep in mind… these achievers are already paying their share. The<br />
top 5% of income earners in America pay nearly 60% of this country’s<br />
income <strong>taxes</strong>.</p>
<p>America needs the achievers. We need investment. We need capital. We<br />
need jobs and innovation and vast increases to productivity. The<br />
government can supply none of these things. So to do my part, I plan to<br />
support the achievers.</p>
<p>Like it or not, as deep in debt as we are, the achievers are our only<br />
hope. That’s why I’m standing up for them. We need the achievers – and<br />
we need more of them to want to come to America with their corporations<br />
and their wealth. You might admire the generosity and egalitarianism of<br />
idealized socialism in some pseudo-intellectual way… But we can’t afford<br />
that nonsense right now. We don’t have enough wealth on a net basis left<br />
to plunder.</p>
<p>We need more of the people Obama and his gang of petty tyrants label<br />
“rich,” “greedy,” and “mean spirited.” These are the people who can get<br />
our country moving in the right direction, right away. Folks who have<br />
spent their lives in the real world recognize the people Obama calls<br />
“rich,” “greedy,” and “mean spirited” as “successful,” “accomplished,”<br />
and “hard working.”</p>
<p>Now… before you send me an angry letter, ask yourself this question: If<br />
America had the lowest corporate tax rate in the world (instead of the<br />
highest), do you think we’d have more companies located here, or fewer?</p>
<p>If we got rid of the estate tax, which makes it impossible for<br />
successful entrepreneurs to leave their companies to their children, do<br />
you think we’d have more family businesses, or fewer? And if we taxed<br />
all people at the same (hopefully low) rate, do you think more wealthy<br />
people from around the world would want to live here, or fewer?</p>
<p>What can I do for the achievers? For one, I can stand up for them and<br />
try to convince you, my dear readers, that we need them – and we need<br />
more and more of them. As such, we shouldn’t treat them so badly or try<br />
to steal from them so blatantly. More directly, of course, I can also<br />
support them by telling them exactly what they can still do to get out<br />
of that shearing line…</p>
<p>In the coming days, weeks, and months, you will see more and more<br />
evidence of my support for the “rich.” I plan to offer you more and more<br />
information about how to get your assets outside the reach of Mr. Obama<br />
and his ilk, including more ideas like buying foreign real estate (which<br />
is, in my view, the best way to get your assets out of the U.S. without<br />
having to report a thing to the U.S. government).</p>
<p>You’ll find this information and other ways to protect yourself from<br />
the currency crisis in my newsletter, Stansberry’s <strong>Investment Advisory</strong>.<br />
Click here to gain access immediately.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p><strong>Porter Stansberry</strong><br />
]&#8220;&#8221;"]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/08/13/dear-mr-president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House Hires Non-Union Crew</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/08/04/white-house-hires-non-union-crew/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/08/04/white-house-hires-non-union-crew/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 16:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GATEWAY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOOD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HEAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MEMBERS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OUTRAGED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Birthday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PUNDIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STUFF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SUB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=22787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 8/4/2011 11:43 AM, No Surrender @&#038;*$?%never.net wrote: > FROM GATEWAY PUNDIT > > HEAD: UNION MEMBERS OUTRAGED > > SUB-HEAD: White House Hires Non-Union Crew For Obama’s Birthday Bash > by Jim Hoft > > > In case you live under a rock and haven’t heard, Barack Obama turned 50 (57?) yesterday. And, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 8/4/2011 <strong>11</strong>:<strong>43</strong> AM, No <a href="mailto:Surrender<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>never.net">Surrender<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>never.net</a> wrote:<br />
> FROM <strong>GATEWAY</strong> <strong>PUNDIT</strong><br />
><br />
> <strong>HEAD</strong>: <strong>UNION</strong> <strong>MEMBERS</strong> <strong>OUTRAGED</strong><br />
><br />
> <strong>SUB</strong>-<strong>HEAD</strong>: <strong>White House</strong> Hires Non-Union Crew For Obama’s Birthday Bash<br />
> by Jim Hoft<br />
><br />
><br />
> In case you live under a rock and haven’t heard, <strong>Barack Obama</strong> turned 50 (57?) yesterday. And, the place to be last night was<br />
> the Aragon. The party started at 7:00. But union members weren&#8217;t invited. The <strong>White House</strong> hired a non-union crew for the<br />
> event.<br />
><br />
> A confidential and trusted union source contacted me to report that the crews called in to work Obama’s birthday bash are<br />
> non-union. Union members are <strong>OUTRAGED</strong> that Obama would turn his back on them.<br />
><br />
> Curiously, my source added that the day rate is actually higher for the non-union members to do the work. It’s not a <strong>money</strong><br />
> issue. What gives?</p>
<p>*<strong>GOOD</strong> <strong>STUFF</strong>*</p>
<p>But it was probably &#8220;quality&#8221;  and professionalism that had the<br />
<strong>Presidential Birthday</strong> party use <strong>NON</strong> union workers.</p>
<p>The union would NO doubt go on strike just before the party&#8230;.  or they<br />
would have taken three days too long to get the party set up, given all<br />
the union rules.</p>
<p>The cost was the last thing on Obama&#8217;s mind, now that he has $2.4<br />
trillion to waste and launder through supporters of his brand of <strong>Socialism</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/08/04/white-house-hires-non-union-crew/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>you contend that this is what America looks like when Republicans totally FUCK the economy?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/20/you-contend-that-this-is-what-america-looks-like-when-republicans-totally-fuck-the-economy/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/20/you-contend-that-this-is-what-america-looks-like-when-republicans-totally-fuck-the-economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACCOMPLISHED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FUCKWIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HEY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Dogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MISSION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAVED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotty Everyth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=22445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 7/19/2011 11:17 PM, Iarnrod wrote: > On Jul 18, 10:18 am, Beam Me Up Scotty Everyth&#8230;@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote: >> On 7/17/2011 1:14 AM,Iarnrodwrote: >> >>> On Jul 16, 2:00 pm, Last Post wrote: >>>> Barack Obama is, according to the Constitution, an illegal President >>>> and has committed multiple felonies both in and out of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 7/19/2011 11:17 PM, Iarnrod wrote:<br />
> On Jul 18, 10:18 am, Beam Me Up Scotty
<then -Destroy-<br />
> <a href="mailto:Everyth...@blackhole.nebulax.com">Everyth&#8230;@blackhole.nebulax.com</a>> wrote:<br />
>> On 7/17/2011 1:14 AM,Iarnrodwrote:<br />
>><br />
>>> On Jul 16, 2:00 pm, Last Post <last_p ...@primus.ca> wrote:<br />
>>>> Barack Obama is, according to the Constitution, an illegal President<br />
>>>> and has committed multiple felonies both in and out of office<br />
>><br />
>>> Hey idiot, Obama is the only president in US history to fully document<br />
>>> his natural born citizenship and prove his eligibility beyond<br />
>>> question. Not only that, he is the latest in a long line of Democratic<br />
>>> presidents who have saved America from Republican economic<br />
>>> malfeasance.<br />
>><br />
>>      *MISSION ACCOMPLISHED*<br />
>><br />
>> So you contend that this is what America looks like when it is SAVED?<br />
><br />
> Hey <acronym title="shit"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> s&*$?%t</span></acronym>-for-brains, it looks better than what it would have looked<br />
> like if GOP destructive economic policies had remained in place. Your<br />
> side&#8217;s <acronym title="fuckin"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> f&*$?%n</span></acronym>&#8217; answer to a recession is to cut spending. HEY FUCKWIT,<br />
> do you not even know what a recession is?<br />
><br />
> I &#8216;spose your answer to fighting a house fire would be to disconnect<br />
> the firefighters&#8217; hoses from the hydrants.</p>
<p>Your solution to putting out the fire is to poor gas on it.    Feed the<br />
fire and break out the Hot Dogs.</p>
<p></last_p></then>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/20/you-contend-that-this-is-what-america-looks-like-when-republicans-totally-fuck-the-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>you contend that this is what America looks like when it is SAVED?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/18/you-contend-that-this-is-what-america-looks-like-when-it-is-saved/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/18/you-contend-that-this-is-what-america-looks-like-when-it-is-saved/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACCOMPLISHED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MISSION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAVED]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=22389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 7/17/2011 1:14 AM, Iarnrod wrote: > On Jul 16, 2:00 pm, Last Post wrote: >> Barack Obama is, according to the Constitution, an illegal President >> and has committed multiple felonies both in and out of office > > Hey idiot, Obama is the only president in US history to fully document > his [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 7/17/2011 1:14 AM, Iarnrod wrote:<br />
> On Jul 16, 2:00 pm, Last Post <last_p ...@primus.ca> wrote:<br />
>> Barack Obama is, according to the Constitution, an illegal President<br />
>> and has committed multiple felonies both in and out of office<br />
><br />
> Hey idiot, Obama is the only president in US history to fully document<br />
> his natural born citizenship and prove his eligibility beyond<br />
> question. Not only that, he is the latest in a long line of Democratic<br />
> presidents who have saved America from Republican economic<br />
> malfeasance.</p>
<p>*MISSION ACCOMPLISHED*</p>
<p>So you contend that this is what America looks like when it is SAVED?</p>
<p>I say this is what &#8220;you&#8221; Socialists wanted&#8230;.  I don&#8217;t accept that this<br />
is what SAVED looks like.</p>
<p></last_p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/18/you-contend-that-this-is-what-america-looks-like-when-it-is-saved/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And speaking of reckless rhetoric</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/13/and-speaking-of-reckless-rhetoric/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/13/and-speaking-of-reckless-rhetoric/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neal Boortz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialist Propaganda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=22333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 7/13/2011 9:30 AM, Neal Boortz wrote: > You have heard what Obama said yesterday, haven&#8217;t you? Just yesterday, > Barack Obama took the issue of the debt ceiling to new heights .. not > intended, I swear .. by trying to terrify seniors on Social Security. Here > is a good lesson on why [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 7/13/2011 9:30 AM, Neal Boortz wrote:<br />
> You have heard what Obama said yesterday, haven&#8217;t you?    Just yesterday,<br />
> Barack Obama took the issue of the debt ceiling to new heights .. not<br />
> intended, I swear .. by trying to terrify seniors on Social Security.  Here<br />
> is a good lesson on why Social Security can never be privatized &#8211; why it<br />
> must (in the minds of Democrats) always remain a government run income<br />
> redistribution program.<br />
><br />
> Our Dear Ruler said this to Scott Pelley on CBS News last night:<br />
><br />
>   &#8220;I cannot guarantee that those [Social Security] checks go out on August<br />
> 3rd if we haven&#8217;t resolved this issue. Because there may simply not be the<br />
> money in the coffers to do it.&#8221;<br />
></p>
<p>Hence the word &#8220;security&#8221; in Social Security, there is NO security&#8230;</p>
<p>because you are pushed around at the whim of government politicians.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s Socialist Propaganda for you, they tell you it&#8217;s secure and then<br />
threaten to end it &#8220;in a kicking screaming tantrum on the floor&#8221; if you<br />
deny them anything in the store that they want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/13/and-speaking-of-reckless-rhetoric/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama is the Bi Polar Commander in Thief</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/02/obama-is-the-bi-polar-commander-in-thief/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/02/obama-is-the-bi-polar-commander-in-thief/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 18:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Cline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=21969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 6/30/2011 10:34 PM, Ubiquitous wrote: > By Andrew Cline > > Who knew that straw men could fly jets? > > To justify his destructive economic policies over the past two years, > President Obama has set fields full of straw men aflame. Not > surprisingly, the economy continues to struggle. Burning political > [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 6/30/2011 10:34 PM, Ubiquitous wrote:<br />
> By Andrew Cline<br />
><br />
> Who knew that straw men could fly jets?<br />
><br />
> To justify his destructive economic policies over the past two years,<br />
> President Obama has set fields full of straw men aflame. Not<br />
> surprisingly, the economy continues to struggle. Burning political<br />
> props, it turns out, doesn&#8217;t create jobs. Alas, the president has not<br />
> noticed.<br />
><br />
> During his press conference yesterday, the president presented his<br />
> newest straw man: the tax-escaping corporate jet owner. The tax-escaping<br />
> corporate jet owner is such a bad person that President Obama mentioned<br />
> him six times during his press conference. He portrayed these people as<br />
> &#8220;millionaires and billionaires&#8221; whose big tax breaks stand in the way of<br />
> Washington adequately funding college scholarships and child safety<br />
> programs.<br />
><br />
> &#8220;I&#8217;ve said to some of the Republican leaders, &#8216;You go talk to your<br />
> constituents &#8212; the Republican constituents &#8212; and ask them,&#8221; Obama<br />
> said, &#8220;are they willing to compromise their kids&#8217; safety so that some<br />
> corporate jet owner continues to get a tax break? And I&#8217;m pretty sure<br />
> what the answer would be.&#8221;<br />
><br />
> But how are corporate jets preventing Washington from keeping children<br />
> safe?<br />
><br />
> Politics, of course. A few years ago, we had a president who wanted to<br />
> pass some tax breaks in the name of stimulating the economy. He thought<br />
> it would be a great idea to let corporations depreciate the cost of<br />
> their company jets more quickly. Allowing a faster depreciation would<br />
> help the companies as well as aircraft manufacturers, who were hurting<br />
> for business. That president&#8217;s name was Barack Obama.</p>
<p>*Obama is the Bipolar Commander in Thief*</p>
<p>Obama has yet to make a real decision&#8230;.  he takes both sides of every<br />
issue like a true Liberal, which is why you can&#8217;t tell the difference<br />
between Obama and a Bipolar patient.   The Pathology of his lies make<br />
you think he can&#8217;t help himself, but it&#8217;s absolutely calculated as every<br />
decision that Obama comes too is a round about evaluation of what he can<br />
get-away with.</p>
<p>Why would anyone want a Bipolar commander in Chief?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/07/02/obama-is-the-bi-polar-commander-in-thief/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding Obama</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/30/understanding-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/30/understanding-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Thinker President Quixote Legacy Confused]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CARNEY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDIOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Clyburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neal Boortz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PRESS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vice President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VILLAGE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wow Couldn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=21921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 6/30/2011 9:32 AM, Neal Boortz wrote: > The word of the week is &#8220;immoral.&#8221; As I pointed out yesterday, Joe Biden, > James Clyburn and other liberal political elite have taken the time to grand > stand against the Republican efforts in these budget talks. The Republicans > want to cut spending and not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 6/30/2011 9:32 AM, Neal Boortz wrote:<br />
> The word of the week is &#8220;immoral.&#8221;  As I pointed out yesterday, Joe Biden,<br />
> James Clyburn and other liberal political elite have taken the time to grand<br />
> stand against the Republican efforts in these budget talks.  The Republicans<br />
> want to cut spending and not raise taxes.  This is what these liberals have<br />
> deemed &#8220;immoral.&#8221;  But apparently we can add another Democrat to the ranks<br />
> of those calling the Republican approach &#8220;immoral&#8221; .. Barack Obama<br />
> apparently agrees that the Republicans are flirting with immorality,<br />
> according to his chief dogwasher Jay Carney.<br />
><br />
> CHIP REID, CBS NEWS: &#8220;This weekend, when the Vice President was laying out<br />
> all the things that you have to do and how much &#8212; when he said you have to<br />
> ask those who are struggling in this economy to bear the burden and let the<br />
> most fortunate among us off the hook, he said that borders on being immoral.<br />
> Does the President agree with that?&#8221;<br />
><br />
> JAY CARNEY, WH PRESS SEC: &#8220;Why, I think he does. Yes.&#8221;<br />
><br />
> That leads me to this excellent column I read in the American Thinker:<br />
> President Quixote&#8217;s Legacy: Confused, Ill-Educated and Not Too Bright.  I<br />
> want to highlight these few paragraphs in particular, which discuss Barack<br />
> Obama and morality as it applies to economics.<br />
><br />
>   Obama&#8217;s ideology blinds him to relevant variables.  Incentives,<br />
> institutional frameworks, profit and loss, individual initiative, saving and<br />
> investment, hard work, etc. have no role in his simplistic world.  He is a<br />
> political creation with no experience in relevant matters.  He does not<br />
> understand markets, business, meeting a payroll, or managing an<br />
> organization.  This vacuum in knowledge produces failed economic results<br />
> because policies do not consider the relevant variables for economic<br />
> success.<br />
><br />
>   In Obama&#8217;s world, success and failure are moral rather than economic<br />
> outcomes.  Success is a marker for evil.  Failure is due to someone else&#8217;s<br />
> success rather than personal shortcomings.  Failure represents passivity,<br />
> the choice to not exploit others.  Proper moral behavior produces failure.<br />
><br />
>   For Obama, economics itself is inconsistent with morality.  Hence<br />
> economics itself must be evil.  This view of the world is both simple and<br />
> ignorant.  No, it is beyond that.  It is a sign of stupidity!  Recognition<br />
> of this stupidity is the key to understanding Obama&#8217;s behavior and policies.<br />
><br />
> Wow!  Couldn&#8217;t have said it better myself.  So I won&#8217;t bother trying.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been calling Obama the *HARVARD VILLAGE IDIOT* for three years now.</p>
<p>Everyone&#8217;s welcome to ride this train.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/30/understanding-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Is No Joke .. Mr. President</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/15/this-is-no-joke-mr-president/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/15/this-is-no-joke-mr-president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juris Diction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=21374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 6/15/2011 5:34 PM, Juris Diction wrote: > In article , > wrote: > >> Yesterday PrezBo went to North Carolina to meet with his Council on Jobs and >> Competiveness. I know what you are thinking .. Barack Obama is the last guy >> that I would associate with job creation or competitiveness .. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 6/15/2011 5:34 PM, Juris Diction wrote:<br />
> In article <qpodnz94qi5nc2xqnz2dnuvz_radnz2d @giganews.com>,<br />
>  <neal Boortz> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> Yesterday PrezBo went to North Carolina to meet with his Council on Jobs and<br />
>> Competiveness.  I know what you are thinking .. Barack Obama is the last guy<br />
>> that I would associate with job creation or competitiveness .. these<br />
>> businessmen must be insulted when he gets up to talk about the issue.  But<br />
>> when asked about the bureaucratic red tape that can delay projects or put a<br />
>> stop to them completely, Obama jokingly says:  &#8220;Shovel-ready was not as &#8230;<br />
>> uh .. shovel-ready as we expected.&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>> Gee, ya think?  And it was nice of you to have a little chuckle at your own<br />
>> cleverness, PrezBo .. But the people who have been out of work for six<br />
>> months weren&#8217;t laughing with you.<br />
>><br />
>> Barack Obama said that if we implemented his grand stimulus plan, it would<br />
>> provide for hundreds of thousands of &#8220;shovel-ready&#8221; projects that will bring<br />
>> our unemployment rate below 8%.  We HAD to do this, otherwise our country<br />
>> would not recove<br />
><br />
> Republicans quashed the &#8220;grand stimulus plan.&#8221; So <acronym title="fuck"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> f&*$?%k</span></acronym> em. If they want<br />
> to hold the people hostage, then the people will pay. It&#8217;s that way with<br />
> Republican  scammers.</p>
<p>Socialism was never going to create any recovery, redistribution is NOT<br />
the way to create jobs&#8230;.   Obama has been lying about jobs all along.</p>
<p></neal></qpodnz94qi5nc2xqnz2dnuvz_radnz2d></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/06/15/this-is-no-joke-mr-president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gas prices up 110% since Barack Obama took office</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/05/08/gas-prices-up-110-since-barack-obama-took-office-3/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/05/08/gas-prices-up-110-since-barack-obama-took-office-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 15:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HOPE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=20264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[> Bob LeChevalier wrote: >> Beam Me Up Scotty >>> On 5/5/2011 8:22 AM, Bob LeChevalier wrote: >>>> &#8220;Jane_Galt&#8221; wrote: >>>>> When Obama took office, gas prices were averaging $1.80 a gallon. >>>>> &#8230; >>>>> The average price of a gallon of gas has now doubled for middle income and >>>>> poor Americans. >>>>> >>>>> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> Bob LeChevalier wrote:<br />
>> Beam Me Up Scotty
<then -Destroy-Everything<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Blackhole.NebulaX.com>
>>> On 5/5/2011 8:22 AM, Bob LeChevalier wrote:<br />
>>>> &#8220;Jane_Galt&#8221; <jane @GaltsGulch.pqz> wrote:<br />
>>>>> When Obama took office, gas prices were averaging $1.80 a gallon.<br />
>>>>> &#8230;<br />
>>>>> The average price of a gallon of gas has now doubled for middle income and<br />
>>>>> poor Americans.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> How&#8217;s that hopey changey thing working out for ya?<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> 6 months before Obama took office, gas prices were over $4 a gallon.<br />
>>>> Then the economy collapsed.  If that is what it takes to get<br />
>>>> $1.80/gallon gas, I think a lot of middle income and poor Americans<br />
>>>> will be happy paying $4/gallon<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Meanwhile, that hopey changey thing got bin Ladin, unlike Obama&#8217;s<br />
>>>> hopeless predecessor, so we have <strong>HOPE</strong> from some <strong>CHANGE</strong> in our<br />
>>>> perpetual &#8220;war on terrorism&#8221;.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Perhaps if the Republicans would stop fighting him on the other things<br />
>>>> he&#8217;s trying to change, he might succeed in all the rest of the hopey<br />
>>>> changey stuff.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Obama used Bush&#8217;s intelligence collection to get <strong>Bin Laden</strong>.<br />
>><br />
>> If that were the case, then why didn&#8217;t Bush get him while still in<br />
>> office?</p>
<p>Bush needed more time to track the nuggets that he mined from enhanced<br />
interrogations.  All the information was handed to Obama who used it to<br />
complete the task&#8230;   So you could look at it as Bushes policy was<br />
successful and Obama has completed the task that Bush started with Bush<br />
intelligence policy.</p>
<p>Bush did get <strong>Bin Laden</strong> because without the Bush intelligence, Obama<br />
would still have his thumb up his <acronym title="ass"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> a&*$?%s</span></acronym> on the golf course.</p>
<p></jane></then>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/05/08/gas-prices-up-110-since-barack-obama-took-office-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gas prices up 110% since Barack Obama took office</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/05/05/gas-prices-up-110-since-barack-obama-took-office-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/05/05/gas-prices-up-110-since-barack-obama-took-office-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 16:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GITMO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HOPE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Material]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=20208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 5/5/2011 11:57 AM, Larry Hewitt wrote: > On 5/5/2011 10:20 AM, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: >> On 5/5/2011 8:22 AM, Bob LeChevalier wrote: >>> &#8220;Jane_Galt&#8221; wrote: >>>> When Obama took office, gas prices were averaging $1.80 a gallon. >>>> &#8230; >>>> The average price of a gallon of gas has now doubled for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 5/5/2011 <strong>11</strong>:57 AM, Larry Hewitt wrote:<br />
> On 5/5/2011 <strong>10</strong>:20 AM, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:<br />
>> On 5/5/2011 8:22 AM, Bob LeChevalier wrote:<br />
>>> &#8220;Jane_Galt&#8221;<jane @GaltsGulch.pqz>  wrote:<br />
>>>> When Obama took office, gas prices were averaging $1.80 a gallon.<br />
>>>> &#8230;<br />
>>>> The average price of a gallon of gas has now doubled for middle<br />
>>>> income and<br />
>>>> poor Americans.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> How&#8217;s that hopey changey thing working out for ya?<br />
>>><br />
>>> 6 months before Obama took office, gas prices were over $4 a gallon.<br />
>>> Then the economy collapsed.  If that is what it takes to get<br />
>>> $1.80/gallon gas, I think a lot of middle income and poor Americans<br />
>>> will be happy paying $4/gallon<br />
>>><br />
>>> Meanwhile, that hopey changey thing got bin Ladin, unlike Obama&#8217;s<br />
>>> hopeless predecessor, so we have <strong>HOPE</strong> from some <strong>CHANGE</strong> in our<br />
>>> perpetual &#8220;war on terrorism&#8221;.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Perhaps if the Republicans would stop fighting him on the other things<br />
>>> he&#8217;s trying to change, he might succeed in all the rest of the hopey<br />
>>> changey stuff.<br />
>><br />
>> Obama used Bush&#8217;s intelligence collection to get <strong>Bin Laden</strong>&#8230;  Obama<br />
>> didn&#8217;t change the <strong>CIA</strong> intelligence by throwing away all the old<br />
>> information from past Bush interrogations, you know the unreliable<br />
>> information from &#8220;enhanced interrogation&#8221; that Obama and <strong>Democrats</strong> say<br />
>> is *NOT* accurate because people will say anything when under stress.<br />
>><br />
>> Just what has Obama changed that has been successful?<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> Obama&#8217;s economic change, No jobs there&#8230;.<br />
>><br />
>> Obama&#8217;s military change, No leaving there&#8230;..<br />
>><br />
>> Obama&#8217;s <strong>GITMO</strong> change, NO closing down there&#8230;.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> Maybe you can give us a hint as to just what Obama has fixed?<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> Killing one old tired and alone retired terrorist, amounts to getting<br />
>> the top man on the <strong>FBI</strong> most wanted list is hardly <strong>Presidential Material</strong>.<br />
>>   It&#8217;s what the <strong>FBI</strong> and the <strong>CIA</strong> do every day.  We just don&#8217;t get it<br />
>> tossed in our face quite the same for every killer they catch or snuff,<br />
>> because there is seldom so much political gain from their capture or<br />
>> death.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
><br />
> Almost all of the intelligence used to get bin Laden was new.<br />
><br />
> If there was significant intelligence while Bush was in office, why<br />
> didn&#8217;t he use it?<br />
><br />
> Larry</p>
<p>Why didn&#8217;t Obama throw away all the tainted Bush intelligence and kill<br />
<strong>Bin Laden</strong> on January 21st 2009 with new intelligence if Obama had better<br />
ways to get intelligence?</p>
<p></jane></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/05/05/gas-prices-up-110-since-barack-obama-took-office-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gas prices up 110% since Barack Obama took office</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/05/05/gas-prices-up-110-since-barack-obama-took-office/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/05/05/gas-prices-up-110-since-barack-obama-took-office/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 14:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GITMO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HOPE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Material]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=20190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 5/5/2011 8:22 AM, Bob LeChevalier wrote: > &#8220;Jane_Galt&#8221; wrote: >> When Obama took office, gas prices were averaging $1.80 a gallon. >> &#8230; >> The average price of a gallon of gas has now doubled for middle income and >> poor Americans. >> >> How&#8217;s that hopey changey thing working out for ya? > [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 5/5/2011 8:22 AM, Bob LeChevalier wrote:<br />
> &#8220;Jane_Galt&#8221; <jane @GaltsGulch.pqz> wrote:<br />
>> When Obama took office, gas prices were averaging $1.80 a gallon.<br />
>> &#8230;<br />
>> The average price of a gallon of gas has now doubled for middle income and<br />
>> poor Americans.<br />
>><br />
>> How&#8217;s that hopey changey thing working out for ya?<br />
><br />
> 6 months before Obama took office, gas prices were over $4 a gallon.<br />
> Then the economy collapsed.  If that is what it takes to get<br />
> $1.80/gallon gas, I think a lot of middle income and poor Americans<br />
> will be happy paying $4/gallon<br />
><br />
> Meanwhile, that hopey changey thing got bin Ladin, unlike Obama&#8217;s<br />
> hopeless predecessor, so we have <strong>HOPE</strong> from some <strong>CHANGE</strong> in our<br />
> perpetual &#8220;war on terrorism&#8221;.<br />
><br />
> Perhaps if the Republicans would stop fighting him on the other things<br />
> he&#8217;s trying to change, he might succeed in all the rest of the hopey<br />
> changey stuff.</p>
<p>Obama used Bush&#8217;s intelligence collection to get <strong>Bin Laden</strong>&#8230;  Obama<br />
didn&#8217;t change the <strong>CIA</strong> intelligence by throwing away all the old<br />
information from past Bush interrogations, you know the unreliable<br />
information from &#8220;enhanced interrogation&#8221; that Obama and <strong>Democrats</strong> say<br />
is *NOT* accurate because people will say anything when under stress.</p>
<p>Just what has Obama changed that has been successful?</p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s economic change, No jobs there&#8230;.</p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s military change, No leaving there&#8230;..</p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s <strong>GITMO</strong> change, NO closing down there&#8230;.</p>
<p>Maybe you can give us a hint as to just what Obama has fixed?</p>
<p>Killing one old tired and alone retired terrorist, amounts to getting<br />
the top man on the <strong>FBI</strong> most wanted list is hardly <strong>Presidential Material</strong>.<br />
It&#8217;s what the <strong>FBI</strong> and the <strong>CIA</strong> do every day.  We just don&#8217;t get it<br />
tossed in our face quite the same for every killer they catch or snuff,<br />
because there is seldom so much political gain from their capture or death.</p>
<p></jane></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/05/05/gas-prices-up-110-since-barack-obama-took-office/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>That wasn&#8217;t what you said when Bush was President&#8230;..</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/26/that-wasnt-what-you-said-when-bush-was-president/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/26/that-wasnt-what-you-said-when-bush-was-president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HEADLINE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LINK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lon Jimmes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OVERVIEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Jigme Wheat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=19838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[> wrote in message > news:d785c2a9-10c1-4ecb-aee9-12e0ab2ea703 @&#038;*$?%v8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com&#8230; > On Apr 25, 7:21 pm, Tom Jigme Wheat wrote: >> On Apr 25, 3:43 pm, maxwel&#8230;@my-deja.com wrote:> On Apr 23, 7:36 am, Lon >> Jimmes wrote: >> >>>> HEADLINE: Gas prices up 110% since Barack Obama took office >> >>>> OVERVIEW: Gas prices are up by an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> <maxwelton @my-deja.com> wrote in message<br />
> news:d785c2a9-10c1-4ecb-aee9-12e0ab2ea703<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>v8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com&#8230;<br />
> On Apr 25, 7:21 pm, <strong>Tom Jigme Wheat</strong>
<thomaswheat1 ...@gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>> On Apr 25, 3:<strong>43</strong> pm, <a href="mailto:maxwel...@my-deja.com">maxwel&#8230;@my-deja.com</a> wrote:> On Apr <strong>23</strong>, 7:36 am, Lon<br />
>> Jimmes <corvus ...@gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>> <strong>HEADLINE</strong>: Gas prices up 110% since <strong>Barack Obama</strong> took office<br />
>><br />
>>>> <strong>OVERVIEW</strong>: Gas prices are up by an insane and stunning 110% since<br />
>>>> <strong>Barack Obama</strong> took office only two years ago, according to <strong>AAA</strong>.<br />
>><br />
>>>> <strong>LINK</strong>:http://www.examiner.com/american-politics-in-vancouver/gas-prices-up-&#8230;<br />
>><br />
>>> And no one is forced to buy it.<br />
>><br />
>> that&#8217;s a crock of <acronym title="shit"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> s&*$?%t</span></acronym>. how are you supposed to get to work. the oil<br />
>> companies have us by the balls.<br />
><br />
>> In the <strong>US</strong> no one is made to buy it. Get an fuel efficient car, get an<br />
>> electric car, ride a bicycle, live closer to work, etc.<br />
>> It is called <strong>freedom</strong> of choice.</p>
<p>That wasn&#8217;t what you said when Bush was President&#8230;..</p>
<p></corvus></thomaswheat1></maxwelton></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/26/that-wasnt-what-you-said-when-bush-was-president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Donald Trump says Obama birth certificate may have Muslim listed as  religion</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/03/donald-trump-says-obama-birth-certificate-may-have-muslim-listed-as-religion-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/03/donald-trump-says-obama-birth-certificate-may-have-muslim-listed-as-religion-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 23:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HEADLINE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Strickland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OVERVIEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sp Qr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=18836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4/3/2011 7:07 PM, RichTravsky wrote: > Bob LeChevalier wrote: >> &#8220;Jeff Strickland&#8221; wrote: >>> &#8220;Sp Qr&#8221; wrote in message >>>> HEADLINE: Donald Trump says Obama birth certificate may have Muslim >>>> listed as religion >>>> >>>> OVERVIEW: Donald Trump says in an interview that Barack Obama&#8216;s birth >>>> certificate may have the word &#8220;Muslim&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 4/3/2011 7:07 PM, RichTravsky wrote:<br />
> Bob LeChevalier wrote:<br />
>> &#8220;<strong>Jeff Strickland</strong>&#8221; <crwlrjeff @yahoo.com> wrote:<br />
>>> &#8220;<strong>Sp Qr</strong>&#8221; <spqr100000 @gmail.com> wrote in message<br />
>>>> <strong>HEADLINE</strong>: <strong>Donald Trump</strong> says Obama birth certificate may have <strong>Muslim</strong><br />
>>>> listed as religion<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> <strong>OVERVIEW</strong>: <strong>Donald Trump</strong> says in an interview that <strong>Barack Obama</strong>&#8216;s birth<br />
>>>> certificate may have the word &#8220;<strong>Muslim</strong>&#8221; listed as his official<br />
>>>> religion.<br />
>>>><br />
>>><br />
>>> That is entirely possible because the parents complete the form(s),<br />
>><br />
>> Why would a government form ask what religion someone is?  It is none<br />
>> of the government&#8217;s business.<br />
>><br />
>> No official birth certificate in this country should mention any<br />
>> religion.<br />
><br />
> Well, it&#8217;s ridiculous anyway. How many newborns have a religion?<br />
><br />
> <strong>RT</strong></p>
<p>Newborns from Muslims are Muslims according to their own religion.</p>
<p></spqr100000></crwlrjeff></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2011/04/03/donald-trump-says-obama-birth-certificate-may-have-muslim-listed-as-religion-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>=======&gt; GREAT NEWS FOR THE JULY 4TH HOLIDAY! &#8220;Barack Obama is among  best presidents ever &#8211; George W. Bush not so much&#8221; &lt;=======</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/03/great-news-for-the-july-4th-holiday-barack-obama-is-among-best-presidents-ever-george-w-bush-not-so-much/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/03/great-news-for-the-july-4th-holiday-barack-obama-is-among-best-presidents-ever-george-w-bush-not-so-much/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 15:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Wraith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GREAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=9237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 7/3/2010 10:58 AM, Brian Wraith wrote: &#62; On 7/3/2010 7:54 AM, ChasNemo wrote: &#62;&#62; =======&#62; GREAT NEWS FOR THE JULY 4TH HOLIDAY! &#8220;Barack Obama is among &#62;&#62; best presidents ever &#62; &#62; &#62; Man, that was hilarious, thanks for the laugh. Yes Obama is just behind Jimmy Carter as the Best president, maybe we [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 7/3/2010 <strong>10</strong>:58 AM, <strong>Brian Wraith</strong> wrote:<br />
&gt; On 7/3/2010 7:54 AM, ChasNemo wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt; =======&gt;  <strong>GREAT</strong> <strong>NEWS</strong> FOR THE JULY 4TH HOLIDAY! &#8220;<strong>Barack Obama</strong> is among<br />
&gt;&gt; best presidents ever<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Man, that was hilarious, thanks for the laugh.</p>
<p>Yes Obama is just behind <strong>Jimmy Carter</strong> as the Best president, maybe we<br />
can give him something like a NOBEL PEACE PRIZE&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/07/03/great-news-for-the-july-4th-holiday-barack-obama-is-among-best-presidents-ever-george-w-bush-not-so-much/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The danger to America is not Barack Obama</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/06/03/the-danger-to-america-is-not-barack-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/06/03/the-danger-to-america-is-not-barack-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 02:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=5784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found this interesting &#8220;The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this interesting</p>
<p>&#8220;The danger to America is not <strong>Barack Obama</strong> but a citizenry capable of<br />
entrusting a man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to<br />
limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the<br />
necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate<br />
willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much<br />
deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of<br />
what ails America. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind<br />
anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The<br />
Republic can survive a <strong>Barack Obama</strong>, who is, after all, merely a fool.<br />
It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made<br />
him their president.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211; </p>
<p>The problem with the global warming theory, is that a theory is like a<br />
bowl of ice-cream, it only takes a little dab of bullshit to ruin the<br />
whole thing.<br />
- Gump That -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/06/03/the-danger-to-america-is-not-barack-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: John Hanson</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/05/22/re-john-hanson-3/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/05/22/re-john-hanson-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 18:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arthur St]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Man]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyrus Griffin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darrell Stec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elias Boudinot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Affairs Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Gorman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Hanson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Henry Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasury Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=5546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 5/21/2010 3:13 PM, Darrell Stec wrote: &#62; Army Of The 13th Monkey wrote: &#62; &#62;&#62; On 5/20/2010 8:30 PM, Cliff wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62; [ &#62;&#62;&#62; The First President Of the United States Was A Black Man (John Hanson) &#62;&#62;&#62; &#62;&#62;&#62; A "Black" Man, A Moor, John Hanson Was the First President of the United &#62;&#62;&#62; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 5/21/2010 3:13 PM, <strong>Darrell Stec</strong> wrote:<br />
&gt; Army Of The 13th Monkey wrote:<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; On 5/20/2010 8:30 PM, Cliff wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; [<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; The First President Of the <strong>United States</strong> Was A <strong>Black Man</strong> (John Hanson)<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; A "Black" Man, A Moor, John Hanson Was the First President of the United<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; States! 1781-1782 A.D.??? <strong>George Washington</strong> was really the 8th President<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; of the <strong>United States</strong>! <strong>George Washington</strong> was not the first President of<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; the <strong>United States</strong>. In fact, the first President of the <strong>United States</strong> was<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; one John Hanson. Don't go checking the encyclopedia for this guy's name -<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; he is one of those great men that are lost to history. If you're<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; extremely lucky, you may actually find a brief mention of his name. The<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; new country was actually formed on March 1, 1781 with the adoption of The<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Articles of Confederation. This document was actually proposed on June<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; 11, 1776, but not agreed upon by <strong>Congress</strong> until November 15, 1777.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Maryland refused to sign this document until Virginia and <strong>New York</strong> ceded<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; their western lands (Maryland was afraid that these states would gain too<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; much <strong>power</strong> in the new government from such large amounts of land). Once<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; the signing took place in 1781, a President was needed to run the<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; country. John Hanson was chosen unanimously by <strong>Congress</strong> (which included<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; <strong>George Washington</strong>). In fact, all the other potential candidates refused<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; to run against him, as he was a major player in the revolution and an<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; extremely influential member of <strong>Congress</strong>. As the first President, Hanson<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; had quite the shoes to fill. No one had ever been President and the role<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; was poorly defined. His actions in office would set precedent for all<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; <strong>future</strong> Presidents. He took office just as the Revolutionary <strong>War</strong> ended.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Almost immediately, the troops demanded to be paid. As would be expected<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; after any long war, there were no funds to meet the salaries. As a<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; result, the soldiers threatened to overthrow the new government and put<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Washington on the throne as a monarch. All the members of <strong>Congress</strong> ran<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; for their lives, leaving Hanson as the only guy left running the<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; government. He somehow managed to calm the troops down and hold the<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; country together. If he had failed, the government would have fallen<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; almost immediately and everyone would have been bowing to King<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Washington. In fact, Hanson sent 800 pounds of sterling siliver by his<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; brother Samuel Hanson to <strong>George Washington</strong> to provide the troops with<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; shoes. Hanson, as President, ordered all foreign troops off American<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; soil, as well as the removal of all foreign flags. This was quite the<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; feat, considering the fact that so many European countries had a stake in<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; the <strong>United States</strong> since the days following Columbus. Hanson established<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; the Great Seal of the <strong>United States</strong>, which all Presidents have since been<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; required to use on all official documents. <strong>President Hanson</strong> also<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; established the first <strong>Treasury Department</strong>, the first Secretary of <strong>War</strong>,<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; and the first <strong>Foreign Affairs Department</strong>. Lastly, he declared that the<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; fourth Thursday of every November was to be Thanksgiving Day, which is<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; still true today.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; The Articles of Confederation only allowed a President to serve a one<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; year term during any three year period, so Hanson actually accomplished<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; quite a bit in such little time. Six other presidents were elected after<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; him - <strong>Elias Boudinot</strong> (1783), Thomas Mifflin (1784), <strong>Richard Henry Lee</strong><br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; (1785), <strong>Nathan Gorman</strong> (1786), <strong>Arthur St</strong>. Clair (1787), and <strong>Cyrus Griffin</strong><br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; (1788) - all prior to Washington taking office. So what happened? Why<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; don't we ever hear about the first seven Presidents of the <strong>United States</strong>?<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; It's quite simple - The Articles of Confederation didn't work well. The<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; individual states had too much <strong>power</strong> and nothing could be agreed upon. A<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; new doctrine needed to be written - something we know as the<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; <strong>Constitution</strong>. And that leads us to the end of our story. George<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Washington was definitely not the first President of the <strong>United States</strong>.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; He was the first President of the <strong>United States</strong> under the <strong>Constitution</strong> we<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; follow today. And the first seven Presidents are forgotten in history. ]<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; I hate to be the one to point it out but we failed as a Nation under the<br />
&gt;&gt; articles of confederation and it&#8217;s president&#8230;.  Looks like history<br />
&gt;&gt; repeats its self.  We aren&#8217;t having much luck with Black Presidents.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; I&#8217;d hate to point this out because a idiotic bigot like you will never<br />
&gt; learn, but the first nation succeeded for 6 more presidents after the black<br />
&gt; president ran the nation under the Articles of Confederation.  You can&#8217;t<br />
&gt; think and it is obvious you can&#8217;t count to seven.</p>
<p>With luck we can last for 6 more years, well 5 1/2&#8230;..</p>
<p>I suppose we&#8217;ll never hear of <strong>Barack Obama</strong> again, just like we never<br />
hear about the first president you&#8217;re telling us about.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s about what <strong>Obama Rates</strong>&#8230;..  so far he has been a big FAT zero.</p>
<p>&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/05/22/re-john-hanson-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Democrats Kill RePIG Attempt To Leave Consumers Unprotected</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/05/06/re-democrats-kill-repig-attempt-to-leave-consumers-unprotected-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/05/06/re-democrats-kill-repig-attempt-to-leave-consumers-unprotected-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 20:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carrie Budoff Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Grassley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deposit Insurance Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympia Snowe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall St]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=4891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 5/6/2010 4:35 PM, H&#038;*$?%e wrote: &#62; &#62; http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=6EE76F84-18FE-70B2-A819F3192B4DD96F &#62; &#62; May 6, 2010 &#62; &#62; GOP Wall St. proposal voted down &#62; &#62; By: Carrie Budoff Brown &#62; &#62; &#62; A Republican plan to substitute its own version of a new consumer &#62; protection agency into the Wall Street reform bill was voted down [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 5/6/2010 4:35 PM, <acronym title="Harry Hope"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> H&*$?%e</span></acronym> wrote:<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=6EE76F84-18FE-70B2-A819F3192B4DD96F<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; May 6, 2010<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; <strong>GOP</strong> <strong>Wall St</strong>. proposal voted down<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; By: <strong>Carrie Budoff Brown</strong><br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; A Republican plan to substitute its own version of a new consumer<br />
&gt; protection agency into the Wall Street reform bill was voted down<br />
&gt; Thursday, with two Republicans joining all 59 <strong>Democrats</strong> to stop the<br />
&gt; <strong>GOP</strong> effort.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; The bill was voted down 38-61, with Republicans <strong>Chuck Grassley</strong> of Iowa<br />
&gt; and <strong>Olympia Snowe</strong> of Maine siding with the <strong>Democrats</strong>.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; A day after the Senate embraced several amendments with broad<br />
&gt; bipartisanship, the chamber shifted into a combative posture Thursday<br />
&gt; as Republicans and <strong>Democrats</strong> traded charges over which party is<br />
&gt; looking out for consumers’ interests.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; <strong>Democrats</strong> have proposed an independent consumer bureau within the<br />
&gt; <strong>Federal</strong> Reserve to write and enforce <strong>regulations</strong> on consumer financial<br />
&gt; products. It would be funded by taxpayers.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; The Republican plan would have created an agency within the <strong>Federal</strong><br />
&gt; <strong>Deposit Insurance Corp</strong>. to write and supervise consumer laws for<br />
&gt; banks, mortgage providers and other nonbank firms “only if they have a<br />
&gt; pattern and practice of violating consumer laws,” said Sen. Richard<br />
&gt; Shelby (R-Ala.), an author of the plan.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Under the plan, the <strong>FDIC</strong> would need to sign off on the consumer rules,<br />
&gt; and funding for the division would come from fees assessed on<br />
&gt; nonbanks.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Unlike the Democratic plan, Republicans would maintain federal<br />
&gt; pre-emption of state consumer protection laws, which would prevent the<br />
&gt; financial industry from having to beat back proposals in 50 different<br />
&gt; states.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; President <strong>Barack Obama</strong> took the rare step Thursday of weighing in on<br />
&gt; the Republican <strong>amendment</strong> to the Wall Street reform bill, issuing a<br />
&gt; statement slamming the <strong>GOP</strong> proposal on consumer protections as “worse<br />
&gt; than the status quo.”<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Obama stopped short of pledging to veto a bill with weakened consumer<br />
&gt; protection provisions, but he tiptoed up to the line:<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; “I will not allow amendments like this one written by Wall Street’s<br />
&gt; lobbyists to pass for reform.”<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; ___________________________________________<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Thanks, Mr. President<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Harry</p>
<p>Slowly but surely huh Harry?  Only 1000 point slide in that stock market<br />
of that great economy.</p>
<p>You didn&#8217;t post on how great thing are going&#8230;..  under Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/05/06/re-democrats-kill-repig-attempt-to-leave-consumers-unprotected-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Obama Regulation Czar Advocated</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/15/re-obama-regulation-czar-advocated/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/15/re-obama-regulation-czar-advocated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 19:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=4041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/15/2010 2:43 PM, Möbius Pretzel wrote: &#62; Obama Regulation Czar Advocated Removing People’s Organs Without &#62; Explicit Consent &#62; &#62; Cass Sunstein, President Barack Obama’s nominee to head the Office of &#62; Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), has advocated a policy &#62; under which the government would “presume” someone has consented to &#62; having [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/15/2010 2:<strong>43</strong> PM, Möbius Pretzel wrote:<br />
&gt; Obama Regulation Czar Advocated Removing People’s Organs Without<br />
&gt; Explicit Consent<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Cass Sunstein, President <strong>Barack Obama</strong>’s nominee to head the <strong>Office</strong> of<br />
&gt; Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), has advocated a policy<br />
&gt; under which the government would “presume” someone has consented to<br />
&gt; having his or her organs removed for transplantation into someone else<br />
&gt; when they die.<br />
&gt; </p>
<p>Keep some mercury in your pocket and swallow it a while before you die.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/15/re-obama-regulation-czar-advocated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Wingers send orders from Hell</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/15/re-wingers-send-orders-from-hell/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/15/re-wingers-send-orders-from-hell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHARITY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haiti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INCOME]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Robertson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PRIVATE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=4040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/15/2010 1:06 PM, Strabo wrote: &#62; TwoGuns wrote: &#62;&#62; On Jan 15, 1:59 am, Cliff &#62;&#62; wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62; http://www.monstersandcritics.com/news/usa/news/article_1525568.php/W&#8230; &#62;&#62;&#62; [ &#62;&#62;&#62; .... &#62;&#62;&#62; Rush Limbaugh, a firebrand conservative radio host, advised listeners on &#62;&#62;&#62; Wednesday not to donate money via the US government. He said that &#62;&#62;&#62; President &#62;&#62;&#62; Barack Obama's administration was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/15/2010 1:06 PM, Strabo wrote:<br />
&gt; TwoGuns wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt; On Jan 15, 1:59 am, Cliff<br />
&gt;&gt; wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; http://www.monstersandcritics.com/news/usa/news/article_1525568.php/W&#8230;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; [<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; ....<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Rush Limbaugh, a firebrand conservative radio host, advised listeners on<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Wednesday not to donate <strong>money</strong> via the <strong>US</strong> government. He said that<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; President<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; <strong>Barack Obama</strong>'s administration was using the tragedy to 'burnish<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; their, <strong>shall</strong> we<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; say, credibility with the black community.'<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; 'Would you trust the <strong>money</strong>'s gonna go to <strong>Haiti</strong>?' Limbaugh asked.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; 'We've already<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; donated to <strong>Haiti</strong>. It's called the <strong>US</strong> income tax.'<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; ....<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; ]<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; [<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; ....<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Meanwhile, <strong>Pat Robertson</strong>, a conservative, Christian evangelical<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; talkshow host<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; who once ran for president, said Wednesday that Haitians were<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; 'cursed' because<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; they 'swore a pact with the devil' to gain independence from <strong>France</strong><br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; more than<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; 200 years ago.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; ....<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; ]<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; [<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; On Robertson, Gibbs said: 'It never ceases to amaze that in times of<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; amazing<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; human suffering somebody says something that could be so utterly<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; stupid.'<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; On Limbaugh, Gibbs told reporters that he was confident the American<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; people<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; would look past the comments and continue donating <strong>money</strong> to a<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; suffering people.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; 'I don't know how anybody could sit where he does, having enjoyed the<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; success<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; that he has, and not feel some measure of sorrow for what has<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; happened in<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; <strong>Haiti</strong>,' Gibbs said. 'I think to use the <strong>power</strong> of your pulpit to try<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; to convince<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; those not to help their brothers and sisters is sad.'<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; ]<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; Did Rush say not to donate to relief for <strong>Haiti</strong>? I didn&#8217;t listen to<br />
&gt;&gt; Rush but I am sure he said to send the <strong>money</strong> to <strong>Haiti</strong> through <strong>PRIVATE</strong><br />
&gt;&gt; <strong>CHARITY</strong> rather than sending it to the government. Like RUSH said IF<br />
&gt;&gt; government funds are being used to send relief to <strong>Haiti</strong> your <strong>INCOME</strong><br />
&gt;&gt; <strong>taxes</strong> are already being used.<br />
&gt;&gt; Typical spin by Gibbs.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; DL<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; <strong>Socialists</strong> can&#8217;t stand the thought of private, independent action.<br />
&gt; </p>
<p>Nothing scares a Socialist more than free people exercising their freedoms.<br />
-Beam Me Up Scotty-  2009</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/15/re-wingers-send-orders-from-hell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: The GOP&#8217;s White Guys</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/13/re-the-gops-white-guys/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/13/re-the-gops-white-guys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EVER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=4020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/13/2010 5:13 PM, Bob wrote: &#62; &#8220;bvallely&#8221; wrote in message &#62; news:81935d12-25ce-4cbf-95f4-8bc8a60ff550 @&#038;*$?%j24g2000yqa.googlegroups.com&#8230; &#62; On Jan 13, 1:48 pm, H&#038;*$?%e wrote: &#62;&#62; http://poderforlatinos.blogspot.com/2010/01/ohn-thune-gop-white-versi&#8230; &#62;&#62; &#62;&#62; 1/13/2010 &#62;&#62; &#62;&#62; Republican Senator John Thune (R-SD), is being heralded as the GOP&#8216;s &#62;&#62; white version of President Obama. &#62;&#62; &#62;&#62; And that is the issue, he is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/13/2010 5:13 PM, Bob wrote:<br />
&gt; &#8220;bvallely&#8221;  wrote in message<br />
&gt; news:81935d12-25ce-4cbf-95f4-8bc8a60ff550<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>j24g2000yqa.googlegroups.com&#8230;<br />
&gt; On Jan 13, 1:48 pm, <acronym title="Harry Hope"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> H&*$?%e</span></acronym>  wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt; http://poderforlatinos.blogspot.com/2010/01/ohn-thune-gop-white-versi&#8230;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; 1/13/2010<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; Republican Senator John Thune (R-<strong>SD</strong>), is being heralded as the <strong>GOP</strong>&#8216;s<br />
&gt;&gt; white version of <strong>President Obama</strong>.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; And that is the issue, he is yet another white guy, in a long list of<br />
&gt;&gt; white guys that the <strong>GOP</strong> and it&#8217;s base truly believes represents<br />
&gt;&gt; America, for them that IS the only image they possess.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; They are missing the main point, the election of <strong>Barack Obama</strong>, was one<br />
&gt;&gt; in which race transcended the history of American politics.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; Minorities and many white voters, are now receptive to the fact that<br />
&gt;&gt; race is no longer a barrier for higher political office.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; To a certain extent, he s our version of Obama the tall, lanky,<br />
&gt;&gt; good-looking, well-spoken senator is how a former top party official<br />
&gt;&gt; put it.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; Given the recent release of Senator <strong>Reid</strong>&#8216;s racial gaffe about<br />
&gt;&gt; <strong>President Obama</strong> not having &#8220;Negro dialect&#8221;, the &#8220;well-spoken senator&#8221;<br />
&gt;&gt; is yet another example of why the <strong>GOP</strong>, simply does not get it.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; _________________________________________________________<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; Did RePIGs <strong>EVER</strong> get it?<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; It seems to me that it&#8217;s the <strong>Democrats</strong> who are obsessed with race, not<br />
&gt; the Republicans.<br />
&gt; **************************************<br />
&gt; It&#8217;s been like that for the last 40 years. </p>
<p><strong>Liberalism</strong> is based on race and is inherently <strong>racist</strong> because in<br />
<strong>Liberalism</strong>, race is the one thing from which all else is derived.<br />
- Beam Me Up Scotty &#8211;  2009</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/13/re-the-gops-white-guys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: America Supports Obama&#8217;s Response to Terrorists</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/13/re-america-supports-obamas-response-to-terrorists/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/13/re-america-supports-obamas-response-to-terrorists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Tue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WEB]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=3929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/13/2010 7:10 AM, Tecknomage wrote: &#62; On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:51:13 -0500, H&#038;*$?%e &#62; wrote: &#62; &#62;&#62; &#62;&#62; http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/terrorism/poll-majority-confident-in-obama-on-terror-approves-of-handling-of-xmas-day-plot/ &#62;&#62; &#62;&#62; 1/11/2010 &#62;&#62; &#62;&#62; Poll: Majority Confident In Obama On Terror, Backs Handling Of Xmas &#62;&#62; Plot &#62;&#62; &#62;&#62; &#62;&#62; Okay, some new polling from CNN just landed in the old in-box, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/13/2010 7:<strong>10</strong> AM, Tecknomage wrote:<br />
&gt; <strong>On Tue</strong>, 12 Jan 2010 21:51:13 -0500, <acronym title="Harry Hope"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> H&*$?%e</span></acronym><br />
&gt; wrote:<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/terrorism/poll-majority-confident-in-obama-on-terror-approves-of-handling-of-xmas-day-plot/<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; 1/<strong>11</strong>/2010<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; Poll: Majority Confident In Obama On Terror, Backs Handling Of Xmas<br />
&gt;&gt; Plot<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; Okay, some new polling from <strong>CNN</strong> just landed in the old in-box, and it<br />
&gt;&gt; appears to suggest that the public isn’t buying claims that Obama’s<br />
&gt;&gt; handling of the <strong>Christmas Day</strong> plot was too detached, cool, or weak:<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; As you know, a man has been charged with attempting to use an<br />
&gt;&gt; explosive device on <strong>Christmas Day</strong> to blow up a plane that was flying<br />
&gt;&gt; to Detroit.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; Do you approve or disapprove of the way <strong>Barack Obama</strong> has responded to<br />
&gt;&gt; that incident?<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; Approve 57%<br />
&gt;&gt; Disapprove 39%<br />
&gt;&gt; No opinion 4%<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; The real way of telling whether Obama’s handling of that particular<br />
&gt;&gt; plot has hurt him is to poll on overall confidence in him, and here’s<br />
&gt;&gt; what <strong>CNN</strong> finds along those lines:<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; How much confidence do you have in the Obama administration to protect<br />
&gt;&gt; U.S. citizens from <strong>future</strong> acts of terrorism — a great deal, a moderate<br />
&gt;&gt; amount, not much or none at all?<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; A great deal 24%<br />
&gt;&gt; A moderate amount 41%<br />
&gt;&gt; Not much 19%<br />
&gt;&gt; None at all 16%<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; These numbers are generally good for Obama, but not completely.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; Only one fourth has a “great deal” of confidence in Obama to protect<br />
&gt;&gt; them.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; That said, a big majority — 65% — has a great deal or a moderate<br />
&gt;&gt; amount of confidence.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; And only 35% adopt the Cheney clan’s view that we should be curled up<br />
&gt;&gt; in the corner with our teeth chattering uncontrollably over lack of<br />
&gt;&gt; confidence in the Obama administration’s ability to protect us.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; That’s pretty remarkable, given that the Cheneys have been all over<br />
&gt;&gt; the airwaves making this case for months and months.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; _________________________________________________<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; Not bad<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; Harry<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Agree, not bad.  But one criticism about the post &amp; ref <strong>WEB</strong> page, a<br />
&gt; link to the actual <strong>CNN</strong> poll cited would have been a way to lend MORE<br />
&gt; credence to article.</p>
<p><strong>CNN</strong> is an arm of the <strong>Democrats</strong> Propaganda <strong>Office</strong>.<br />
Post the poll and lets see how many people in what area and at what time<br />
it was asked and what the questions were&#8230;.  Polls can be manipulated<br />
to say almost anything.  How many <strong>CNN</strong> polls were found to be correct in<br />
the last 5 years?</p>
<p><strong>CNN</strong> isn&#8217;t to be believed. And Harry&#8217;s stamp of approval casts even more<br />
doubt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/13/re-america-supports-obamas-response-to-terrorists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barack Obama&#8217;s Assault on Marriage&gt;&gt;OR&lt;&lt;  Some people call it Lying,</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/11/barack-obamas-assault-on-marriageor-some-people-call-it-lying/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/11/barack-obamas-assault-on-marriageor-some-people-call-it-lying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gunna Pay Mo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=3897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/11/2010 10:34 AM, Mr.B1ack wrote: &#62; &#8220;vict0r&#8221; wrote: &#62; &#62;&#62; &#62;&#62; &#62;&#62; Married Couples Pay More Than Unmarried Under Health Bill &#62; &#62; Whatever happened to &#8220;Nobody (except the evil &#62; &#8216;rich&#8217;) will have to pay ANY more taxes ?&#8221;. When translated from *Socialist- h&#038;*$?%y* dialect to Negro dialect, the meaning of &#8220;Nobody (except [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>11</strong>/2010 <strong>10</strong>:34 AM, Mr.B1ack wrote:<br />
&gt; &#8220;vict0r&#8221;  wrote:<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; Married Couples Pay More Than Unmarried Under Health Bill<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;    Whatever happened to &#8220;Nobody (except the evil<br />
&gt;    &#8216;rich&#8217;) will have to pay ANY more <strong>taxes</strong> ?&#8221;. </p>
<p>When translated from *Socialist-<acronym title="honky"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> h&*$?%y</span></acronym>* dialect to Negro dialect, the<br />
meaning of &#8220;Nobody (except the evil &#8216;rich&#8217;) will have to pay ANY more<br />
<strong>taxes</strong> ?&#8221;</p>
<p>Is that &#8220;We&#8217;s all <strong>Gunna Pay Mo</strong>!&#8221;</p>
<p>&gt;    And why did so many voters believe in that<br />
&gt;    &#8216;free <strong>money</strong>&#8216; <strong>BS</strong> in the first place ? </p>
<p>They just didn&#8217;t speak the same dialect as Obama, you see Obama has a<br />
*Socialist dialect* that hides the truth very well.  Some people call it<br />
Lying, but *&#8221;Socialist dialect&#8221;* is a much more polite euphemism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/11/barack-obamas-assault-on-marriageor-some-people-call-it-lying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Tea Party planning national strike for January 20th</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/06/re-tea-party-planning-national-strike-for-january-20th-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/06/re-tea-party-planning-national-strike-for-january-20th-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=3812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/6/2010 1:36 AM, Freestyle wrote: &#62; On Jan 3, 4:30 pm, General Disaster &#62; wrote: &#62;&#62; As President Barack Obama&#8216;s first year in office draws to a close, Tea &#62;&#62; Party groups are planning to mark the occasion with a national strike - &#62;&#62; something local leaders say could demonstrate the conservative groups&#8217; &#62;&#62; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/6/2010 1:36 AM, Freestyle wrote:<br />
&gt; On Jan 3, 4:30 pm, <strong>General Disaster</strong><br />
&gt; wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt; As President <strong>Barack Obama</strong>&#8216;s first year in office draws to a close, Tea<br />
&gt;&gt; Party groups are planning to mark the occasion with a national strike -<br />
&gt;&gt; something local leaders say could demonstrate the conservative groups&#8217;<br />
&gt;&gt; burgeoning strength.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; So Walmarts in the South will close for a day. So what?</p>
<p>There goes more tax dollars down the toilet, poor Obama will have to<br />
borrow another trillion dollars from the Chinese to pay for his <strong>Socialism</strong>.</p>
<p>Taxes are what Obama needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/06/re-tea-party-planning-national-strike-for-january-20th-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Barack Obama:  &#8220;&#8230;so that people can see&#8230;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/06/re-barack-obama-so-that-people-can-see/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/06/re-barack-obama-so-that-people-can-see/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Lady Hillary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lamont Cranston]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=3806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/6/2010 10:40 AM, Lamont Cranston wrote: &#62; &#8220;Beam Me Up Scotty&#8221; wrote in &#62; message news:4B439EEC.8090409 @&#038;*$?%Talk-n-dog.com &#62;&#62; On 1/5/2010 3:00 PM, Lamont Cranston wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62; &#8220;vict0r&#8221; wrote in message &#62;&#62;&#62; news:9FF0n.14237$dl4.14135 @&#038;*$?%en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; **** Obama: &#8220;I&#8217;m going to have all the negotiations around a big &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; table&#8230;&#8221; **** &#62;&#62;&#62; &#62;&#62;&#62; He tried that. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/6/2010 <strong>10</strong>:40 AM, <strong>Lamont Cranston</strong> wrote:<br />
&gt; &#8220;Beam Me Up Scotty&#8221;  wrote in<br />
&gt; message news:4B439EEC.8090409<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Talk-n-dog.com<br />
&gt;&gt; On 1/5/2010 3:00 PM, <strong>Lamont Cranston</strong> wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; &#8220;vict0r&#8221;  wrote in message<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; news:9FF0n.14237$dl4.14135<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;   **** Obama:  &#8220;I&#8217;m going to have all the negotiations around a big<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; table&#8230;&#8221; ****<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; He tried that.  It didn&#8217;t work because the Party of No would have no<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; part of it.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; *How did that prevent him from still making it transparent* &#8230;?<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; The <strong>Democrats</strong> can still hold open meetings.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Have you read the part of the <strong>Constitution</strong> about separation of powers?</p>
<p>Which reminds me&#8230; how did <strong>First Lady Hillary</strong> run the last health care<br />
debacle?</p>
<p>was that constitutional?</p>
<p>Is it constitutional to force people to buy health care?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/06/re-barack-obama-so-that-people-can-see/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Barack Obama:  &#8220;&#8230;so that people can see&#8230;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/05/re-barack-obama-so-that-people-can-see-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/05/re-barack-obama-so-that-people-can-see-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 20:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lamont Cranston]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=3801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/5/2010 3:00 PM, Lamont Cranston wrote: &#62; &#8220;vict0r&#8221; wrote in message &#62; news:9FF0n.14237$dl4.14135 @&#038;*$?%en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com &#62;&#62; **** Obama: &#8220;I&#8217;m going to have all the negotiations around a big &#62;&#62; table&#8230;&#8221; **** &#62; &#62; He tried that. It didn&#8217;t work because the Party of No would have no &#62; part of it. *How did that prevent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/5/2010 3:00 PM, <strong>Lamont Cranston</strong> wrote:<br />
&gt; &#8220;vict0r&#8221;  wrote in message<br />
&gt; news:9FF0n.14237$dl4.14135<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>en-nntp-03.dc1.easynews.com<br />
&gt;&gt;   **** Obama:  &#8220;I&#8217;m going to have all the negotiations around a big<br />
&gt;&gt; table&#8230;&#8221; ****<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; He tried that.  It didn&#8217;t work because the Party of No would have no<br />
&gt; part of it.</p>
<p>*How did that prevent him from still making it transparent* &#8230;?</p>
<p>The <strong>Democrats</strong> can still hold open meetings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/05/re-barack-obama-so-that-people-can-see-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: U.S. to Lose $400 Billion on Fannie and Freddie</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/04/re-u-s-to-lose-400-billion-on-fannie-and-freddie-3/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/04/re-u-s-to-lose-400-billion-on-fannie-and-freddie-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BUY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Rahm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EASIER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fanny Freddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOVERNMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Socialist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PONZI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rahm Emanuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wallison Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WASHINGTON]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=3791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/4/2010 3:42 PM, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: &#62; On 1/4/2010 3:28 PM, US_Army_Nutcase wrote: &#62;&#62; On Jan 4, 8:41 am, Beam Me Up Scotty &#62; dog.com&#62; wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62; On 1/3/2010 9:45 PM, Sid9 wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62; &#62;&#62;&#62; &#62;&#62;&#62; &#62;&#62;&#62; &#62;&#62;&#62; &#62;&#62;&#62; &#62;&#62;&#62; &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; &#8220;vict0r&#8221; wrote in message &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; news:nrb0n.1374$er1.615 @&#038;*$?%en-nntp-07.dc1.easynews.com&#8230; &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; U.S. to Lose [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/4/2010 3:42 PM, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:<br />
&gt; On 1/4/2010 3:28 PM, US_Army_Nutcase wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt; On Jan 4, 8:41 am, Beam Me Up Scotty &gt; dog.com&gt; wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; On 1/3/2010 9:45 PM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &#8220;vict0r&#8221;  wrote in message<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; news:nrb0n.1374$er1.615<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>en-nntp-07.dc1.easynews.com&#8230;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; U.S. to Lose $400 Billion on <strong>Fannie</strong>, Freddie, <strong>Wallison Says</strong><br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Dec. 31, 2009<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Taxpayer losses from supporting <strong>Fannie</strong> Mae and <strong>Freddie Mac</strong> will top $400<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; billion, according to Peter Wallison, a former general counsel at the<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Treasury who is now a fellow at the <strong>American Enterprise Institute</strong>.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &#8220;The situation is they are losing gobs of money, up to $400 billion in<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; <strong>mortgages</strong>,&#8221; Wallison said in a Bloomberg Television interview. The<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Treasury<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Department recognized last week that losses will be more than $400<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; billion<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; when it raised its limit on federal support for the two<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; government-sponsored<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; enterprises, he said.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a2Z5GnTAPcuo<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &#8212;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; <strong>Fannie</strong> Mae Eases Credit To Aid Mortgage Lending<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; September 30, 1999<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; <strong>WASHINGTON</strong>, Sept. 29- In a move that could help increase home ownership<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; rates among minorities and low-income consumers, the <strong>Fannie</strong> Mae<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Corporation<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; is easing the credit requirements on loans that it will purchase from<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; banks<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; and other lenders.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; The action, which will begin as a pilot program involving 24 banks in 15<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; markets &#8212; including the New York metropolitan region &#8212; will encourage<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; those banks to extend home <strong>mortgages</strong> to individuals whose credit is<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; generally not good enough to qualify for conventional loans. <strong>Fannie</strong> Mae<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; officials say they hope to make it a nationwide program by next spring.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; http://www.nytimes.com/1999/09/30/business/fannie-mae-eases-credit-to&#8230;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &#8212;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; <strong>Rahm Emanuel</strong>&#8216;s profitable stint at mortgage giant<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Short <strong>Freddie Mac</strong> stay made him at least $320,000<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Before its portfolio of bad loans helped trigger the current housing<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; crisis,<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; mortgage giant <strong>Freddie Mac</strong> was the focus of a major accounting scandal<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; that<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; led to a management shake-up, huge fines and scalding condemnation of<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; passive directors by a top federal regulator.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; One of those allegedly asleep-at-the-switch board members was<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Chicago&#8217;s Rahm<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Emanuel-now chief of staff to President <strong>Barack Obama</strong>-who made at least<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; $320,000 for a 14-month stint at <strong>Freddie Mac</strong> that required little effort.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/obama/chi-rahm-emanuel-pr&#8230;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; .<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; .<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; A trillion in <strong>Iraq</strong> in an unnecessary war.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; For all the Democrat <strong>Liberal Socialist</strong> Liars that say Bush attacked <strong>Iraq</strong><br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; and there were no terrorists in <strong>Iraq</strong>&#8230;&#8230;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JE48XHKG64<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Had there been no <strong>Iraq</strong> war there might not have been the housing<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; collapse&#8230;.it all goes back to incompetent Republicans running our<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; government<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Housing collapse was the private markets, they were coerced by<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; government to give out bad loans.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Congress *is* the economic Problem.- Hide quoted <strong>text</strong> -<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; &#8211; Show quoted <strong>text</strong> -<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; Coerced?  Apparently you have a comprehension problem.  Oh, that&#8217;s<br />
&gt;&gt; right, comprehension, or lack thereof, is a common ailment of <acronym title="fucking"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> f&*$?%g</span></acronym><br />
&gt;&gt; retards.  <strong>Fannie</strong> and Freddi eased credit requirements on loans they<br />
&gt;&gt; would <strong>BUY</strong> from lenders.  In other words, ignorant buffoon, they made<br />
&gt;&gt; the lenders&#8217; lives <strong>EASIER</strong> by buying the <acronym title="shitty"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> s&*$?%y</span></acronym> assed loans those<br />
&gt;&gt; lenders made.  Does that sound like &#8220;coercion&#8221; to you, silly little<br />
&gt;&gt; dipshit?<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lr1M1T2Y314<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; The above link tells you how they were coerced, Fanny and Freddy are<br />
&gt; &#8220;<strong>GSE</strong>&#8221; Government Spcocered Entities and buy and sell over 50% of all<br />
&gt; home loans in the <strong>USA</strong>&#8230;.    Once fanny and Freddy were &#8220;asked&#8221; to ease<br />
&gt; credit requirements then what did the Banks have to lose since they were<br />
&gt; selling the loans to Fanny and Freddy(Government entities). So the banks<br />
&gt; had two reasons to make bad loans.  One reason was *they didn&#8217;t* *want*<br />
&gt; *the Government suing them* , and they could unload those bad loans back<br />
&gt; to the &#8220;government Fanny&amp;Freddy&#8221; buyers and not take very much risk, so<br />
&gt; they hoped.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; The whole thing was created by our <strong>GOVERNMENT</strong>.</p>
<p>Basically the government was Kiting a check&#8230;..  the bad loans were<br />
expected to be passed on to investments that would have enough diversity<br />
to write the bad loans off.  The problem came when the people buying<br />
Fanny and Freddy investment vehicles found that they were buying too<br />
many bad loans because Freddy and Fanny had lowered the credit standards<br />
too low.</p>
<p>When Fanny had no one buying their investments they ran out of new<br />
Capital to buy new <strong>mortgages</strong> from banks and the markets froze. With the<br />
Markets frozen, Fanny and Freddy were stuck with a lot of bad loans they<br />
had bought and couldn&#8217;t sell&#8230;.   Basically they finally got caught<br />
with their pants down.</p>
<p>It was a <strong>PONZI</strong> scheme and Maddoff went to <strong>jail</strong> for a similar business<br />
plan.  Eventually the scam ran out of suckers to buy the Fanny and<br />
Freddy, &#8220;sucker&#8221; packaged <strong>mortgages</strong>.</p>
<p>What was also bad was the Banks also got caught with bad <strong>mortgages</strong> as<br />
fanny and Freddy quit buying their affordable housing <strong>mortgages</strong>.</p>
<p>&#8211; </p>
<p>                   *BE VERY CONCERNED*</p>
<p>Sometimes you eat the bear, sometimes the bear eats you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/04/re-u-s-to-lose-400-billion-on-fannie-and-freddie-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: U.S. to Lose $400 Billion on Fannie and Freddie</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/04/re-u-s-to-lose-400-billion-on-fannie-and-freddie-6/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/04/re-u-s-to-lose-400-billion-on-fannie-and-freddie-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Rahm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Socialist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rahm Emanuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wallison Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WASHINGTON]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=3783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/3/2010 9:45 PM, Sid9 wrote: &#62; &#62; &#8220;vict0r&#8221; wrote in message &#62; news:nrb0n.1374$er1.615 @&#038;*$?%en-nntp-07.dc1.easynews.com&#8230; &#62;&#62; U.S. to Lose $400 Billion on Fannie, Freddie, Wallison Says &#62;&#62; &#62;&#62; Dec. 31, 2009 &#62;&#62; &#62;&#62; Taxpayer losses from supporting Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will top $400 &#62;&#62; billion, according to Peter Wallison, a former general counsel [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/3/2010 9:45 PM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; &#8220;vict0r&#8221;  wrote in message<br />
&gt; news:nrb0n.1374$er1.615<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>en-nntp-07.dc1.easynews.com&#8230;<br />
&gt;&gt; U.S. to Lose $400 Billion on <strong>Fannie</strong>, Freddie, <strong>Wallison Says</strong><br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; Dec. 31, 2009<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; Taxpayer losses from supporting <strong>Fannie</strong> Mae and <strong>Freddie Mac</strong> will top $400<br />
&gt;&gt; billion, according to Peter Wallison, a former general counsel at the<br />
&gt;&gt; Treasury who is now a fellow at the <strong>American Enterprise Institute</strong>.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; &#8220;The situation is they are losing gobs of <strong>money</strong>, up to $400 billion in<br />
&gt;&gt; <strong>mortgages</strong>,&#8221; Wallison said in a Bloomberg Television interview. The<br />
&gt;&gt; Treasury<br />
&gt;&gt; Department recognized last week that losses will be more than $400<br />
&gt;&gt; billion<br />
&gt;&gt; when it raised its limit on federal support for the two<br />
&gt;&gt; government-sponsored<br />
&gt;&gt; enterprises, he said.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a2Z5GnTAPcuo<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; &#8212;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; <strong>Fannie</strong> Mae Eases Credit To Aid Mortgage Lending<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; September 30, 1999<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; <strong>WASHINGTON</strong>, Sept. 29- In a move that could help increase home ownership<br />
&gt;&gt; rates among minorities and low-income consumers, the <strong>Fannie</strong> Mae<br />
&gt;&gt; Corporation<br />
&gt;&gt; is easing the credit requirements on loans that it will purchase from<br />
&gt;&gt; banks<br />
&gt;&gt; and other lenders.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; The action, which will begin as a pilot program involving 24 banks in 15<br />
&gt;&gt; markets &#8212; including the <strong>New York</strong> metropolitan region &#8212; will encourage<br />
&gt;&gt; those banks to extend home <strong>mortgages</strong> to individuals whose credit is<br />
&gt;&gt; generally not good enough to qualify for conventional loans. <strong>Fannie</strong> Mae<br />
&gt;&gt; officials say they hope to make it a nationwide program by next spring.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; http://www.nytimes.com/1999/09/30/business/fannie-mae-eases-credit-to-aid-mortgage-lending.html?sec=&amp;spon=&amp;pagewanted=2<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; &#8212;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; <strong>Rahm Emanuel</strong>&#8216;s profitable stint at mortgage giant<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; Short <strong>Freddie Mac</strong> stay made him at least $320,000<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; Before its portfolio of bad loans helped trigger the current housing<br />
&gt;&gt; crisis,<br />
&gt;&gt; mortgage giant <strong>Freddie Mac</strong> was the focus of a major accounting scandal<br />
&gt;&gt; that<br />
&gt;&gt; led to a management shake-up, huge fines and scalding condemnation of<br />
&gt;&gt; passive directors by a top federal regulator.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; One of those allegedly asleep-at-the-switch board members was<br />
&gt;&gt; Chicago&#8217;s Rahm<br />
&gt;&gt; Emanuel-now chief of staff to President <strong>Barack Obama</strong>-who made at least<br />
&gt;&gt; $320,000 for a 14-month stint at <strong>Freddie Mac</strong> that required little effort.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/obama/chi-rahm-emanuel-profit-26-mar26,0,5682373.story<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt; .<br />
&gt; .<br />
&gt; A trillion in <strong>Iraq</strong> in an unnecessary war.</p>
<p>For all the Democrat <strong>Liberal Socialist</strong> Liars that say Bush attacked <strong>Iraq</strong><br />
and there were no <strong>terrorists</strong> in <strong>Iraq</strong>&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p><object width="500" height="375"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9JE48XHKG64?version=3&#038;feature=oembed"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9JE48XHKG64?version=3&#038;feature=oembed" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="500" height="375" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>&gt; Had there been no <strong>Iraq</strong> war there might not have been the housing<br />
&gt; collapse&#8230;.it all goes back to incompetent Republicans running our<br />
&gt; government</p>
<p>Housing collapse was the private markets, they were coerced by<br />
government to give out bad loans.</p>
<p><strong>Congress</strong> *is* the economic Problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/04/re-u-s-to-lose-400-billion-on-fannie-and-freddie-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Obama according to John Yoo B</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/03/re-obama-according-to-john-yoo-b/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/03/re-obama-according-to-john-yoo-b/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 22:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=3627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/3/2010 4:38 PM, mani deli wrote: &#62; In his new book John Yoo Bush Attorney, known as &#8220;torture Boy&#8221; &#62; favorably argues that President Barack Obama is wielding executive &#62; powers in the same manner as his White House predecessor. &#62; Yet another black eye for Obama&#8230;. &#62; &#8220;President Obama has come to have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/3/2010 4:38 PM, mani deli wrote:<br />
&gt; In his new book John Yoo Bush Attorney, known as &#8220;torture Boy&#8221;<br />
&gt; favorably argues that President <strong>Barack Obama</strong> is wielding executive<br />
&gt; powers in the same manner as his <strong>White House</strong> predecessor.<br />
&gt; </p>
<p>Yet another black eye for Obama&#8230;.</p>
<p>&gt; &#8220;<strong>President Obama</strong> has come to have more in common with the ends of the<br />
&gt; Bush administration&#8217;s terrorism policies than did Candidate Obama,&#8221;<br />
&gt; Yoo writes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2010/01/03/re-obama-according-to-john-yoo-b/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Mayo Clinic in Arizona to Stop Treating Some Medicare Patients</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/12/31/re-mayo-clinic-in-arizona-to-stop-treating-some-medicare-patients/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/12/31/re-mayo-clinic-in-arizona-to-stop-treating-some-medicare-patients/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 22:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Academy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Medical Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annual Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Physicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lori Heim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lynn Closway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mayo Clinic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mayo Glendale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mayo Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare Loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare Medicaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare Payment Advisory Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Berenson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban Institute Health Policy Center]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=3604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 12/31/2009 5:00 PM, Bob wrote: &#62; Mayo Clinic in Arizona to Stop Treating Some Medicare Patients &#62; &#62; By David Olmos &#62; &#62; Dec. 31 (Bloomberg) &#8212; The Mayo Clinic, praised by President Barack Obama as &#62; a national model for efficient health care, will stop accepting Medicare &#62; patients as of tomorrow at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 12/31/2009 5:00 PM, Bob wrote:<br />
&gt; <strong>Mayo Clinic</strong> in Arizona to Stop Treating Some Medicare Patients<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; By David Olmos<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Dec. 31 (Bloomberg) &#8212; The <strong>Mayo Clinic</strong>, praised by <strong>President Barack</strong> Obama as<br />
&gt; a national model for efficient health care, will stop accepting Medicare<br />
&gt; patients as of tomorrow at one of its primary-care clinics in Arizona,<br />
&gt; saying the U.S. government pays too little.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; More than 3,000 patients eligible for Medicare, the government&#8217;s largest<br />
&gt; health-<strong>insurance</strong> program, will be forced to pay cash if they want to<br />
&gt; continue seeing their doctors at a Mayo family clinic in Glendale, northwest<br />
&gt; of Phoenix, said Michael Yardley, a Mayo spokesman. The decision, which<br />
&gt; Yardley called a two-year pilot project, won&#8217;t affect other Mayo facilities<br />
&gt; in Arizona, Florida and Minnesota.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Obama in June cited the nonprofit Rochester, Minnesota-based <strong>Mayo Clinic</strong> and<br />
&gt; the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio for offering &#8220;the highest quality care at costs<br />
&gt; well below the national norm.&#8221; Mayo&#8217;s move to drop Medicare patients may be<br />
&gt; copied by family doctors, some of whom have stopped accepting new patients<br />
&gt; from the program, said <strong>Lori Heim</strong>, president of the <strong>American Academy</strong> of<br />
&gt; <strong>Family Physicians</strong>, in a telephone interview yesterday.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; &#8220;Many physicians have said, &#8216;I simply cannot afford to keep taking care of<br />
&gt; Medicare patients,&#8217;&#8221; said Heim, a family doctor who practices in Laurinburg,<br />
&gt; North Carolina. &#8220;If you truly know your business costs and you are losing<br />
&gt; money, it doesn&#8217;t make sense to do more of it.&#8221;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; <strong>Medicare Loss</strong><br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; The Mayo organization had 3,700 staff physicians and scientists and treated<br />
&gt; 526,000 patients in 2008. It lost $840 million last year on Medicare, the<br />
&gt; government&#8217;s health program for the disabled and those 65 and older, Mayo<br />
&gt; spokeswoman <strong>Lynn Closway</strong> said.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Mayo&#8217;s hospital and four clinics in Arizona, including the Glendale<br />
&gt; facility, lost $120 million on Medicare patients last year, Yardley said.<br />
&gt; The program&#8217;s payments cover about 50 percent of the cost of treating<br />
&gt; elderly primary-care patients at the Glendale clinic, he said.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; &#8220;We firmly believe that Medicare needs to be reformed,&#8221; Yardley said in a<br />
&gt; Dec. 23 e-mail. &#8220;It has been true for many years that Medicare payments no<br />
&gt; longer reflect the increasing cost of providing services for patients.&#8221;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Mayo will assess the financial effect of the decision in Glendale to drop<br />
&gt; Medicare patients &#8220;to see if it could have implications beyond Arizona,&#8221; he<br />
&gt; said.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Nationwide, doctors made about 20 percent less for treating Medicare<br />
&gt; patients than they did caring for privately insured patients in 2007, a<br />
&gt; payment gap that has remained stable during the last decade, according to a<br />
&gt; March report by the <strong>Medicare Payment Advisory Commission</strong>, a panel that<br />
&gt; advises Congress on Medicare issues. Congress last week postponed for two<br />
&gt; months a 21.5 percent cut in Medicare reimbursements for doctors.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; <strong>National Participation</strong><br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Medicare covered an estimated 45 million Americans at the end of 2008,<br />
&gt; according to the Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services, the agency in<br />
&gt; charge of the programs. While 92 percent of U.S. family doctors participate<br />
&gt; in Medicare, only 73 percent of those are accepting new patients under the<br />
&gt; program, said Heim of the national physicians&#8217; group, citing surveys by the<br />
&gt; Leawood, Kansas-based organization.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Greater access to primary care is a goal of the broad overhaul supported by<br />
&gt; Obama that would provide health <strong>insurance</strong> to about 31 million more<br />
&gt; Americans. More family doctors are needed to help reduce medical costs by<br />
&gt; encouraging prevention and early treatment, Obama said in a June 15 speech<br />
&gt; to the <strong>American Medical Association</strong> meeting in Chicago.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Reid Cherlin, a White House spokesman for health care, declined comment on<br />
&gt; Mayo&#8217;s decision to drop Medicare primary care patients at its Glendale<br />
&gt; clinic.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; <strong>Medicare Costs</strong><br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Mayo&#8217;s Medicare losses in Arizona may be worse than typical for doctors<br />
&gt; across the U.S., Heim said. Physician costs vary depending on business<br />
&gt; expenses such as office rent and payroll. &#8220;It is very common that we hear<br />
&gt; that Medicare is below costs or barely covering costs,&#8221; Heim said.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Mayo will continue to accept Medicare as payment for laboratory services and<br />
&gt; specialist care such as cardiology and neurology, Yardley said.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; <strong>Robert Berenson</strong>, a fellow at the Urban Institute&#8217;s Health Policy Center in<br />
&gt; Washington, D.C., said physicians&#8217; claims of inadequate reimbursement are<br />
&gt; overstated. Rather, the program faces a lack of medical providers because<br />
&gt; not enough new doctors are becoming family doctors, internists and<br />
&gt; pediatricians who oversee patients&#8217; primary care.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; &#8220;Some primary care doctors don&#8217;t have to see Medicare patients because there<br />
&gt; is an unlimited <strong>demand</strong> for their services,&#8221; Berenson said. When patients<br />
&gt; with private <strong>insurance</strong> can be treated at 50 percent to 100 percent higher<br />
&gt; fees, &#8220;then Medicare does indeed look like a poor payer,&#8221; he said.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; <strong>Annual Costs</strong><br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; A Medicare patient who chooses to stay at Mayo&#8217;s Glendale clinic will pay<br />
&gt; about $1,500 a year for an annual physical and three other doctor visits,<br />
&gt; according to an October letter from the facility. Each patient also will be<br />
&gt; assessed a $250 annual administrative fee, according to the letter. Medicare<br />
&gt; patients at the Glendale clinic won&#8217;t be allowed to switch to a primary care<br />
&gt; doctor at another Mayo facility.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; A few hundred of the clinic&#8217;s Medicare patients have decided to pay cash to<br />
&gt; continue seeing their primary care doctors, Yardley said. Mayo is helping<br />
&gt; other patients find new physicians who will accept Medicare.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; &#8220;We&#8217;ve had many patients call us and express their unhappiness,&#8221; he said.<br />
&gt; &#8220;It&#8217;s not been a pleasant experience.&#8221;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Mayo&#8217;s decision may herald similar moves by other Phoenix- area doctors who<br />
&gt; cite inadequate Medicare fees as a reason to curtail treatment of the<br />
&gt; elderly, said John Rivers, chief executive of the Phoenix-based Arizona<br />
&gt; Hospital and Healthcare Association.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; &#8220;We&#8217;ve got doctors who are saying we are not going to deal with Medicare<br />
&gt; patients in the hospital&#8221; because they consider the fees too low, Rivers<br />
&gt; said. &#8220;Or they are saying we are not going to take new ones in our<br />
&gt;  practice.&#8221;</p>
<p>What&#8217;s more is that half the people that have no <strong>insurance</strong>, they qualify<br />
for Medicade when they get sick and go to the hospital.</p>
<p>So Democrats numbers of ~30 million w/o <strong>insurance</strong> is wrong, half of them<br />
already could be covered by Medicade.  The NEW health <strong>insurance</strong> laws<br />
will still leave some 15 million w/o coverage.</p>
<p>That means that for a cost of only $2trillion dollars, we bought *NOTHING*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/12/31/re-mayo-clinic-in-arizona-to-stop-treating-some-medicare-patients/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: What’s Wrong With Global Governme</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/12/24/re-what%e2%80%99s-wrong-with-global-governme/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/12/24/re-what%e2%80%99s-wrong-with-global-governme/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dallas Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=3533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 12/24/2009 10:21 AM, Stanley F. Nelson wrote: &#62; George W. Bush and his strange associates did more to harm the United States &#62; of America than anything that has ever come along. I said during the Bush &#62; years that our fine nation would survive the Bush presidency but we would &#62; need years [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 12/24/2009 <strong>10</strong>:21 AM, Stanley F. Nelson wrote:<br />
&gt; George W. Bush and his strange associates did more to harm the <strong>United States</strong><br />
&gt; of America than anything that has ever come along.  I said during the Bush<br />
&gt; years that our fine nation would survive the Bush presidency but we would<br />
&gt; need years to recover from it &#8212; and only one year has passed.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Thanks in great measure to the measured, reasoned leadership of President<br />
&gt; <strong>Barack Obama</strong>, we did not succomb to total failure and we are, in fact,<br />
&gt; recovering.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; The sickness of Reagen economics did not work before <strong>Reagan</strong>, did not work<br />
&gt; for him, did not work for Bush and does not and will not work now.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Take heed.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Stanley F. Nelson<br />
&gt; <strong>Dallas Democrat</strong>.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
Ride that Unicorn Stanley&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/12/24/re-what%e2%80%99s-wrong-with-global-governme/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: President Obama gives himself a B-plus grade</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/12/15/re-president-obama-gives-himself-a-b-plus-grade/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/12/15/re-president-obama-gives-himself-a-b-plus-grade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TMT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WASHINGTON]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=3368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 12/15/2009 1:42 PM, RD (The Sandman) wrote: &#62; Too_Many_Tools wrote in news:9a925522-6246- &#62; 42fc-9212-12aff6b32752 @&#038;*$?%k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com: &#62; &#62;&#62; Not bad for the guy who kicked major Republican butt in 2008. &#62;&#62; &#62;&#62; I again want to thank all the Republicans who voted for Bush&#8230;Obama &#62;&#62; would never have been elected without your efforts. ;&#62; &#62;&#62; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 12/15/2009 1:42 PM, <strong>RD</strong> (The Sandman) wrote:<br />
&gt; Too_Many_Tools  wrote in news:9a925522-6246-<br />
&gt; 42fc-9212-12aff6b32752<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com:<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; Not bad for the guy who kicked major Republican butt in 2008.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; I again want to thank all the Republicans who voted for Bush&#8230;Obama<br />
&gt;&gt; would never have been elected without your efforts. ;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; Laugh&#8230;laugh&#8230;laugh&#8230;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; <strong>TMT</strong><br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; <strong>President Obama</strong> gives himself a B-plus grade<br />
&gt;&gt; Sun Dec 13, <strong>11</strong>:<strong>43</strong> pm <strong>ET</strong><br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; <strong>WASHINGTON</strong> – President <strong>Barack Obama</strong>, in an interview that aired<br />
&gt;&gt; Sunday, gave himself &#8220;a good solid B-plus&#8221; grade for his first year in<br />
&gt;&gt; office.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Hell, I would have given myself an &#8220;A&#8221;.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s a Socialist, *from that vantage point* a B+ was correct until he<br />
can Socialize our health care&#8230; Then he gets a <strong>BIG</strong> <strong>FAT</strong> SOCIALIST A+</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/12/15/re-president-obama-gives-himself-a-b-plus-grade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Tiger Wood/Barack Obama&#8230;.Phenomenoms?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/12/10/re-tiger-woodbarack-obama-phenomenoms/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/12/10/re-tiger-woodbarack-obama-phenomenoms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=3192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wayne wrote: &#62; &#8220;AnAmericanCitizen&#8221; wrote in message &#62; news:9p00i55m4867m8pt7nei1unju9236asjba @&#038;*$?%4ax.com&#8230; &#62;&#62; Ultimately, Woods is an exceptional golfer with a character problem. &#62;&#62; Barack Obama, by &#62;&#62; contrast, is not an exceptional, or even particularly competent, leader. &#62;&#62; But because &#62;&#62; so many politicians, interest groups and factions have an interest in his &#62;&#62; continued &#62;&#62; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wayne wrote:<br />
&gt; &#8220;AnAmericanCitizen&#8221;  wrote in message<br />
&gt; news:9p00i55m4867m8pt7nei1unju9236asjba<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>4ax.com&#8230;<br />
&gt;&gt; Ultimately, Woods is an exceptional golfer with a character problem.<br />
&gt;&gt; <strong>Barack Obama</strong>, by<br />
&gt;&gt; contrast, is not an exceptional, or even particularly competent, leader.<br />
&gt;&gt; But because<br />
&gt;&gt; so many politicians, interest groups and factions have an interest in his<br />
&gt;&gt; continued<br />
&gt;&gt; presence, no one is ready to reveal the man behind the curtain just yet.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt; If Tiger can get a little breather in the press coverage, and then go out<br />
&gt; and kick <acronym title="ass"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> a&*$?%s</span></acronym> in a couple of tournaments, his problems will be far behind.<br />
&gt; His popularity is generated by his ability to play golf to whatever level<br />
&gt; required to win&#8230;.nothing else.  In reality, nobody really cares about his<br />
&gt; personal life.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; </p>
<p>Tiger is toast&#8230; he might as well look to Trojan for a job as a spokes<br />
person for condoms, he can talk to us from all the best hotels on the<br />
tour and tell us about the best holes, and how to protect your putter.</p>
<p>His chance for double entendre possibilities in commercials is endless.</p>
<p>&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/12/10/re-tiger-woodbarack-obama-phenomenoms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: The Boss tells bloated Republican governor to shove it.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/12/09/re-the-boss-tells-bloated-republican-governor-to-shove-it/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/12/09/re-the-boss-tells-bloated-republican-governor-to-shove-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Springsteen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Elect Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=3186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[H&#038;*$?%e wrote: &#62; http://gothamist.com/2009/12/09/the_boss_snubs_jerseys_new_republic.php &#62; &#62; The Boss Snubs Jersey&#8216;s New Republican Governor &#62; &#62; New Jersey rocker Bruce Springsteen rejected an offer to perform at &#62; the inauguration of his state&#8217;s Governor-Elect Chris Christie — &#62; possibly because Christie is a Republican. &#62; &#62; Even though Christie has attended 122 Springsteen concerts and went [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><acronym title="Harry Hope"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> H&*$?%e</span></acronym> wrote:<br />
&gt; http://gothamist.com/2009/12/09/the_boss_snubs_jerseys_new_republic.php<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; The Boss Snubs <strong>Jersey</strong>&#8216;s New Republican Governor<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; New <strong>Jersey</strong> rocker <strong>Bruce Springsteen</strong> rejected an offer to perform at<br />
&gt; the inauguration of his state&#8217;s Governor-Elect Chris Christie —<br />
&gt; possibly because Christie is a Republican.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Even though Christie has attended 122 Springsteen concerts and went as<br />
&gt; far as ditching a campaign fundraiser to go to one of the Boss&#8217; shows,<br />
&gt; the Democratic crooner declined to perform at the inaugural, the Times<br />
&gt; reports.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Christie then offered Springsteen an opportunity to play at a benefit<br />
&gt; concert days before the Jan. 19, giving the rocker a chance to perform<br />
&gt; for his biggest fan without appearing at a Republican political event.<br />
&gt; But the Boss — who has performed <strong>Democrats</strong> <strong>Barack Obama</strong> and John Kerry<br />
&gt; — again said no.</p>
<p>Those rich fat cat rock stars are selfish that way.</p>
<p>They think they own a song and treat it like they treat their <strong>money</strong>,<br />
they hoard it.  They can&#8217;t own a song anymore than I own my paycheck.</p>
<p>All that song is, is their paycheck.</p>
<p>&gt; ________________________________________________________<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; OK<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Harry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/12/09/re-the-boss-tells-bloated-republican-governor-to-shove-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Obama Gets Credit for Unemployment dropping 0.2%?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/12/08/re-obama-gets-credit-for-unemployment-dropping-0-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/12/08/re-obama-gets-credit-for-unemployment-dropping-0-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lamont Cranston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PDQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=3171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[r wiley wrote: &#62; &#8220;r wiley&#8221; wrote in message news:hfjuuv$rcv$1 @&#038;*$?%news.netins.net&#8230; &#62;&#62; &#8220;Lamont Cranston&#8221; wrote in message news:hfj82r$sok$1 @&#038;*$?%news.datemas.de&#8230; &#62;&#62;&#62; r wiley wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; And congressional Democrats get credit for more than &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; doubling the unemployment rate since January 2007. &#62;&#62;&#62; Really? What did they do or not do that caused it? &#62;&#62; I don&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>r wiley wrote:<br />
&gt; &#8220;r wiley&#8221;  wrote in message news:hfjuuv$rcv$1<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>news.netins.net&#8230;<br />
&gt;&gt; &#8220;<strong>Lamont Cranston</strong>&#8221;  wrote in message news:hfj82r$sok$1<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>news.datemas.de&#8230;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; r wiley wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; And congressional <strong>Democrats</strong> get credit for more than<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; doubling the <strong>unemployment</strong> rate since January 2007.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Really?  What did they do or not do that caused it?<br />
&gt;&gt; I don&#8217;t know, but the facts are:<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; January 1995, Republicans take control of <strong>Congress</strong>, <strong>unemployment</strong> 5.6%<br />
&gt;&gt; January 2001 George W. Bush takes the <strong>White House</strong>, <strong>unemployment</strong> 4.2%<br />
&gt;&gt; January 2007 <strong>Democrats</strong> take control of <strong>Congress</strong>, <strong>unemployment</strong> 4.6%<br />
&gt;&gt; January 2009 <strong>Barack Obama</strong> takes the <strong>White House</strong>, <strong>unemployment</strong> 7.6%<br />
&gt;&gt; November 2009 <strong>unemployment</strong> <strong>10</strong>%<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; http://data.bls.gov/<strong>PDQ</strong>/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; The plain truth is the <strong>unemployment</strong> rate has more than doubled since the<br />
&gt;&gt; <strong>Democrats</strong> took Congrress, almost half of that increase since <strong>Barack Obama</strong><br />
&gt;&gt; took the <strong>White House</strong>.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; rw<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; So here&#8217;s the deal.  If the <strong>unemployment</strong> rate goes below 7.6% while Obama is<br />
&gt; still president, his supporters can make a case that Obama improved the economy.<br />
&gt; </p>
<p>They will just lie and fudge the numbers like they are now.</p>
<p>&gt; If the <strong>unemployment</strong> rate goes below 4.6% while the <strong>Democrats</strong> still control <strong>Congress</strong><br />
&gt; their supporters can make a case that the <strong>Democrats</strong> improved the economy.</p>
<p>this has a bit of reality to it.   It will never happen under<br />
Obama/<strong>Pelosi</strong>&#8216;s <strong>Socialism</strong>.</p>
<p>&gt;<br />
&gt; rw<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/12/08/re-obama-gets-credit-for-unemployment-dropping-0-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Cringing Over Climategate</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/12/07/re-cringing-over-climategate/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/12/07/re-cringing-over-climategate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 13:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=3156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shrikeback wrote: &#62; On Dec 6, 11:13 pm, Bret Cahill wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; &#8220;Science and scientific process must inform and guide decisions of my &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; administration on a wide range of issues, including . mitigation of climate &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; change,&#8221; President Barack Obama declared in a not-so-subtle dig at his &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; predecessor soon after assuming office. &#8220;The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shrikeback wrote:<br />
&gt; On Dec 6, <strong>11</strong>:13 pm, Bret Cahill  wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &#8220;Science and scientific process must inform and guide decisions of my<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; administration on a wide range of issues, including . mitigation of <strong>climate</strong><br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; <strong>change</strong>,&#8221; President <strong>Barack Obama</strong> declared in a not-so-subtle dig at his<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; predecessor soon after assuming office. &#8220;The public must be able to trust<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; the science and scientific process. Public officials should not suppress or<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; alter scientific technological findings.&#8221;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Last week&#8217;s Climategate scandal is putting Obama&#8217;s promise to the test.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Exactly!<br />
&gt;&gt; You need to develop some software that can hide the decline<br />
&gt;&gt; of the popularity of our President.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; I&#8217;ll get right on that.  Just how much of that trillion dollar<br />
&gt; skimulus will I get to skim?</p>
<p>You&#8217;re making up the numbers so keep as much as you like, Obama and the<br />
<strong>Democrats</strong> are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/12/07/re-cringing-over-climategate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Fighting the enemy under CinC Barack Obama</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/11/25/re-fighting-the-enemy-under-cinc-barack-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/11/25/re-fighting-the-enemy-under-cinc-barack-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Branch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FRIEND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[increased]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MAIL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Tue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saul Alinsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soldiers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=3076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hal wrote: &#62; On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:53:20 -0500, &#8220;Dionysus&#8221; &#62; wrote: &#62; &#62;&#62; AN E-MAIL FROM A FRIEND &#62;&#62; &#62;&#62; This is what’s happening to our ability to fight an enemy under the &#62;&#62; Commander in Chief Barack Obama &#62; &#62; You&#8217;re the enemy. We know&#8230;. *The Civil war has begun and you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hal wrote:<br />
&gt; <strong>On Tue</strong>, 24 Nov 2009 18:53:20 -0500, &#8220;Dionysus&#8221;<br />
&gt;  wrote:<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; AN E-<strong>MAIL</strong> FROM A <strong>FRIEND</strong><br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; This is what’s happening to our ability to fight an enemy under the<br />
&gt;&gt; Commander in Chief <strong>Barack Obama</strong><br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; You&#8217;re the enemy. </p>
<p>We know&#8230;.</p>
<p> *The Civil war has begun and you just don&#8217;t know it*   &#8230;.Look at the<br />
Liberal attacks on the people that raise their heads above the crowd,<br />
the Liberals/<strong>Socialists</strong> viciously attempt to destroy them.</p>
<p>Joe the Plumber and Palin and Now Wilson and dozens in between.</p>
<p>They attack on every front, Internet hacking attacks, frivolous legal<br />
attacks to consume energy and <strong>money</strong>, Personal attacks on opponents and<br />
family. Propaganda attacks are coordinated across <strong>Liberal Media</strong> the<br />
Unions and the <strong>Executive Branch</strong> and <strong>Congress</strong> and community organizing<br />
foot <strong>soldiers</strong>&#8230;</p>
<p>If you remember back to the Revolutionary war, the <strong>War</strong> was waged by<br />
*targeting the officers* of the English military to create disarray and<br />
confusion in our enemy.</p>
<p>The Progressive-<strong>Socialists</strong> have been using this tactic for some time<br />
now, they have adopted <strong>Saul Alinsky</strong>&#8216;s plan to target their opponents and<br />
viscously destroy them, these <strong>Socialists</strong> even try to *destroy the*<br />
*Families* to destroy anyone that would show signs of organizing the<br />
opposition into a cohesive resistance to the Socialist steam roller.</p>
<p>We haven&#8217;t yet progressed to large battles with shooting in the streets<br />
but we have <strong>violence</strong> and protests and subversive sabotage of the enemy.<br />
Obama has declared war on his enemy and they are us.</p>
<p>The left has created a third front in America&#8217;s war and it is the Civil<br />
<strong>War</strong> against capitalism, the *Socialist In Chief* has decided to attack<br />
our own, and in the midst of a foreign war he has <strong>increased</strong> the<br />
hostility against our own people.</p>
<p>The <strong>Socialists</strong> have diverted the interest in winning in <strong>Afghanistan</strong> for<br />
the attack and domination of the economy, for <strong>Socialism</strong> over <strong>Capitalism</strong><br />
and for the Government over the people of the <strong>USA</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/11/25/re-fighting-the-enemy-under-cinc-barack-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Last gasps of obsolete GOP</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/11/15/re-last-gasps-of-obsolete-gop/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/11/15/re-last-gasps-of-obsolete-gop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bugsy Siegel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Sat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=2910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lookout wrote: &#62; On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 19:52:23 -0800, tankfixer &#62; wrote: &#62; &#62;&#62; In article , &#62;&#62; mrLookout @&#038;*$?%yahoo.com says&#8230; &#62;&#62;&#62; On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:48:29 -0800, Bugsy Siegel &#62;&#62;&#62; wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62; &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; In article , &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; dennism3 @&#038;*$?%dennism3.invalid says&#8230; &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; In article , Bugsy Siegel &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; Palin, on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lookout wrote:<br />
&gt; <strong>On Sat</strong>, 14 Nov 2009 19:52:<strong>23</strong> -0800, tankfixer<br />
&gt; wrote:<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; In article ,<br />
&gt;&gt; mrLookout<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>yahoo.com says&#8230;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:48:29 -0800, <strong>Bugsy Siegel</strong><br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;  wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; In article ,<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; dennism3<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>dennism3.invalid says&#8230;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; In article , <strong>Bugsy Siegel</strong><br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;  wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Palin, on the other <strong>hand</strong>, has had executive experience as a governor. She<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; is perfect for an executive position in the <strong>White House</strong>.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;  Finding a presidential nominee even more intellectually uncurious<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; and unprepared than George W. Bush is a tall order but Republicans might<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; have done it with <strong>Sarah Palin</strong>. We&#8217;re not going down that path again,<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; especially only four years.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Having <strong>Barack Obama</strong> as the chief executive was quite a stretch. The<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; rookie has never had to make an executive decision in his life. He is<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; still applying for the job.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; He got the job because the last idiot <acronym title="fucked"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> f&*$?%d</span></acronym> up so bad.<br />
&gt;&gt; Too bad the current idiot is making such a hash of the job..<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Give him his 8 years<br />
We can&#8217;t afford 8 years of Obama.<br />
&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/11/15/re-last-gasps-of-obsolete-gop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Economy News</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/10/29/economy-news-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/10/29/economy-news-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOVER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FORCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lehman Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reuters Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soldiers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WATCH]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=2660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Economy News W.H. cautious on new economic figures Politico &#8211; It might not feel like it to most voters, but the U.S. economy is growing again after a more than a year of contraction. 31 minutes ago [STIMULUS WATCH: Stimulus jobs overstated by 1,000s] STIMULUS WATCH: Stimulus jobs overstated by 1,000s AP &#8211; An early [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Economy News</strong></p>
<p>W.H. cautious on new economic figures<br />
Politico &#8211; It might not feel like it to most voters, but the U.S.<br />
economy is growing again after a more than a year of contraction.<br />
31 minutes ago</p>
<p>[STIMULUS <strong>WATCH</strong>: Stimulus jobs overstated by 1,000s] STIMULUS <strong>WATCH</strong>:<br />
Stimulus jobs overstated by 1,000s<br />
<strong>AP</strong> &#8211; An early progress report on <strong>President Barack</strong> Obama&#8217;s economic<br />
recovery plan overstates by thousands the number of jobs created or<br />
saved through the stimulus program, a mistake that White House officials<br />
promise will be corrected in future reports.<br />
38 minutes ago</p>
<p><strong>Mexico</strong> City holiday travel expected to remain same<br />
<strong>AP</strong> &#8211; About the same number of Mexican nationals living in the U.S. are<br />
expected to travel to <strong>Mexico</strong> City and surrounding areas for the holidays<br />
this year, despite the swine flu epidemic and the bad economy, a Mexican<br />
official said Wednesday.<br />
46 minutes ago</p>
<p>[Oil rises to near $79 on strong <strong>US</strong> growth data] Oil rises to near $79<br />
on strong <strong>US</strong> growth data<br />
<strong>AP</strong> &#8211; Oil prices rose to near $79 a barrel Thursday after fresh data<br />
showed that the U.S. economy grew faster than expected in the third<br />
quarter, raising hopes of a sustained recovery in <strong>demand</strong>.<br />
50 minutes ago</p>
<p><strong>US</strong>-POLITICS Summary<br />
Obama honors slain <strong>soldiers</strong> killed in <strong>Afghanistan</strong> <strong>DOVER</strong> <strong>AIR</strong> <strong>FORCE</strong> <strong>BASE</strong>,<br />
Delaware (Reuters) &#8211; <strong>President Barack</strong> Obama saw first hand the human<br />
cost of the <strong>Afghanistan</strong> war as he welcomed home on Thursday 18 <strong>soldiers</strong><br />
and Drug Enforcement Administration agents &#8230;<br />
1 hour, 26 minutes ago</p>
<p>Obama economic adviser: work left to do on economy<br />
Reuters &#8211; A top economic adviser to U.S. <strong>President Barack</strong> Obama said on<br />
Thursday that gross domestic product growth is an encouraging sign that<br />
the economy is moving in the right direction, but things must improve<br />
more to restore growth in the job market. &#8230;<br />
1 hour, 44 minutes ago</p>
<p>[ExxonMobil profit plunges 68 percent] ExxonMobil profit plunges 68 percent<br />
<strong>AFP</strong> &#8211; ExxonMobil, the largest <strong>US</strong> oil producer, on Thursday reported a 68<br />
percent drop in third-quarter profit from a year ago to 4.73 billion<br />
dollars following lower fuel <strong>demand</strong> amid an economic slump.<br />
2 hours, 12 minutes ago</p>
<p>[First-time jobless claims drop less than expected] First-time jobless<br />
claims drop less than expected<br />
<strong>AP</strong> &#8211; The number of people claiming jobless benefits for the first time<br />
dropped less than expected last week, evidence that the labor market<br />
remains weak even as the economy is recovering.<br />
2 hours, 27 minutes ago</p>
<p>Jobless claims edge down, continued claims slide<br />
Reuters &#8211; The number of U.S. workers filing new claims for jobless<br />
benefits dipped by 1,000 last week, while the number collecting<br />
long-term aid fell to the lowest reading in seven months as the job<br />
market steadied.<br />
2 hours, 51 minutes ago</p>
<p>(<strong>AP</strong>)<br />
<strong>AP</strong> &#8211; <strong>US</strong> officials say <strong>China</strong> has agreed to lift ban on <strong>US</strong> swine imports<br />
imposed because of flu.<br />
3 hours ago</p>
<p>[Dollar dips against euro before <strong>US</strong> growth data] Dollar dips against<br />
euro before <strong>US</strong> growth data<br />
<strong>AFP</strong> &#8211; The dollar dipped against the euro on Thursday ahead of critical<br />
data which could show that the <strong>US</strong> economy emerged from a deep recession<br />
in the third quarter, analysts said.<br />
3 hours, 53 minutes ago</p>
<p>[Obama seeks new powers to dismantle nonbank firms] Obama seeks new<br />
powers to dismantle nonbank firms<br />
<strong>AP</strong> &#8211; A year after <strong>Lehman Brothers</strong> collapsed, helping to trigger the<br />
worst financial crisis in seven decades, the Obama administration is<br />
pressing Congress for the power to dismantle other nonbank firms<br />
considered so large and influential that they could b &#8230;<br />
4 hours, 54 minutes ago</p>
<p>Ahead of the Bell: Jobless claims<br />
<strong>AP</strong> &#8211; The number of newly laid-off workers seeking unemployment benefits<br />
likely dropped last week, a sign the labor market is improving a bit as<br />
job cuts ease and the economy slowly recovers from the worst recession<br />
since the 1930s.<br />
5 hours ago</p>
<p>Oil rises near $<strong>78</strong> on expected U.S. economic growth<br />
<strong>LONDON</strong> (Reuters) &#8211; Oil rose toward $<strong>78</strong> on Thursday as the United States,<br />
the world&#8217;s biggest energy consumer, was expected to return to economic<br />
growth, but gains were limited by the weakness of prompt fuel <strong>demand</strong>.<br />
5 hours, 4 minutes ago</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/10/29/economy-news-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Barack Obama is not a natural born US citizen and is ineligible</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/10/21/re-barack-obama-is-not-a-natural-born-us-citizen-and-is-ineligible/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/10/21/re-barack-obama-is-not-a-natural-born-us-citizen-and-is-ineligible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AWOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Slums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drunken Frat Boy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GITMO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lamont Cranston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ma Auburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama President Teleprompter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=2482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ma Auburn wrote: &#62; &#8220;Lamont Cranston&#8221; wrote in news:hbhtou &#62; $6ka$1 @&#038;*$?%news.datemas.de: &#62; &#62;&#62; Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62; fargo116 wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; On Oct 16, 2:32 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; Iarnrod wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; On Oct 16, 12:04 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; Only if he reads it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ma Auburn</strong> wrote:<br />
&gt; &#8220;<strong>Lamont Cranston</strong>&#8221;  wrote in news:hbhtou<br />
&gt; $6ka$1<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>news.datemas.de:<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; fargo116 wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; On Oct 16, 2:32 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;  wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Iarnrod wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; On Oct 16, 12:04 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;  wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Only if he reads it off a teleprompter after it was<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; written by<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; his <strong>23</strong> speech writers.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; What is the rightards&#8217; issue with use of Teleprompters?<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; <strong>Reagan</strong> used<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &#8216;em, <strong>AWOL</strong> used &#8216;em, they all had speech writers&#8230;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; What accounts for the sudden problem &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; #racism&gt;?<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; So when you picked on Bush you were a <strong>racist</strong>, I see how<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; that works.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Can you tell all of us just how getting mad at the<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; <strong>Drunken Frat Boy</strong><br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; for getting our kids killed for nothing is &#8216;racism&#8217;?<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; S. Olson<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; The same way my ridiculing Obama for his lack of oratory<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; skills<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; without a teleprompter is <strong>racist</strong>.<br />
&gt;&gt; Did Obama use a teleprompter when he kicked McCain&#8217;s <acronym title="ass"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> a&*$?%s</span></acronym> in<br />
&gt;&gt; three different debates?<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt; He didn&#8217;t. But George W. Bush did use a radio in his debates with Kerry.<br />
&gt; This is what makes the lunatics calling Obama &#8220;President Teleprompter&#8221;<br />
&gt; so laughable.</p>
<p>           *Obama*<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to keep Lobbyist out of his Administration.<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to close <strong>GITMO</strong><br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to hire people Qualified to do their job.<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to stop the economic slide into the abyss.<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to stop <strong>Iran</strong> from producing nuclear fissile material<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to stop ear marks.<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to bring *all* the troops home.<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to end the Patriot act.<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to create an effective energy plan.<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to drill for <strong>American Oil</strong>.<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to make coal cleaner.<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to lower <strong>taxes</strong> for 95%, instead he&#8217;s raising a carbon tax/<strong>VAT</strong> tax.<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to get a dog from the pound.<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to create Bipartisanship in the USA<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to negotiate with <strong>terrorists</strong>/pirates rather than killing them.<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to read &#8220;line by line&#8221; any spending bills before signed<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Failure</strong> to get the Olympics for Chicago<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to get Valerie Jarred big graft for her <strong>Chicago Slums</strong><br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to Talk to his Generals in the <strong>War</strong> Zone.<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to act decisively on the war in <strong>Afghanistan</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/10/21/re-barack-obama-is-not-a-natural-born-us-citizen-and-is-ineligible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Barack Obama is not a natural born US citizen and is ineligible</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/10/19/re-barack-obama-is-not-a-natural-born-us-citizen-and-is-ineligible-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/10/19/re-barack-obama-is-not-a-natural-born-us-citizen-and-is-ineligible-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AWOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drunken Frat Boy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Crowley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=2473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[T&#038;*$?%y wrote: &#62; On Oct 18, 9:41 am, Beam Me Up Scotty dog.com&#62; wrote: &#62;&#62; fargo116 wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62; On Oct 16, 6:21 pm, T&#038;*$?%y wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; On Oct 16, 3:44 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty &#62;&#62;&#62; dog.com&#62; wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; fargo116 wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; On Oct 16, 2:32 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; dog.com&#62; wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><acronym title="Tim Crowley"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> T&*$?%y</span></acronym></strong> wrote:<br />
&gt; On Oct 18, 9:41 am, Beam Me Up Scotty  dog.com&gt; wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt; fargo116 wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; On Oct 16, 6:21 pm, <strong><acronym title="Tim Crowley"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> T&*$?%y</span></acronym></strong>  wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; On Oct 16, 3:44 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty &gt;&gt;&gt; dog.com&gt; wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; fargo116 wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; On Oct 16, 2:32 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; dog.com&gt; wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Iarnrod wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; On Oct 16, 12:04 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; dog.com&gt; wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Only if he reads it off a teleprompter after it was written by his <strong>23</strong><br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; speech writers.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; What is the rightards&#8217; issue with use of Teleprompters? <strong>Reagan</strong> used<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &#8216;em, <strong>AWOL</strong> used &#8216;em, they all had speech writers&#8230;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; What accounts for the sudden problem ?<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; So when you picked on Bush you were a <strong>racist</strong>, I see how that works.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Can you tell all of us just how getting mad at the <strong>Drunken Frat Boy</strong><br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; for getting our kids killed for nothing is &#8216;racism&#8217;?<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; S. Olson<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; The same way my ridiculing Obama for his lack of oratory skills without<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; a teleprompter is <strong>racist</strong>.  Surely you aren&#8217;t so stupid that you can&#8217;t<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; see what is so obvious.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Did you know that most modern presidents used TelePrompTers?<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; how did you get so <acronym title="fucking"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> f&*$?%g</span></acronym> stupid.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Yeah, is it congental or did you have to go someplace special?<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; S. Olson<br />
&gt;&gt; So why are you bragging on his reading skills?<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; He did know such thing. Again I ask. Why do you lie?  Did you parents<br />
&gt; teach you to lie? DId you reject your parents teaching?  What happened<br />
&gt; to you to turn you into a bald faced liar?<br />
&gt; </p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing you don&#8217;t know what the word liar means.  Other wise you<br />
would have given the proof with the empty accusations you made.</p>
<p>Otherwise it simply makes you the liar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/10/19/re-barack-obama-is-not-a-natural-born-us-citizen-and-is-ineligible-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Barack Obama is not a natural born US citizen and is ineligible</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/10/19/re-barack-obama-is-not-a-natural-born-us-citizen-and-is-ineligible-3/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/10/19/re-barack-obama-is-not-a-natural-born-us-citizen-and-is-ineligible-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGAIN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AWOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CONCERNED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drunken Frat Boy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Socialist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Crowley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=2469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[fargo116 wrote: &#62; On Oct 18, 10:41 am, Beam Me Up Scotty dog.com&#62; wrote: &#62;&#62; fargo116 wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62; On Oct 16, 6:21 pm, T&#038;*$?%y wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; On Oct 16, 3:44 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty &#62;&#62;&#62; dog.com&#62; wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; fargo116 wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; On Oct 16, 2:32 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; dog.com&#62; wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fargo116 wrote:<br />
&gt; On Oct 18, <strong>10</strong>:41 am, Beam Me Up Scotty  dog.com&gt; wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt; fargo116 wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; On Oct 16, 6:21 pm, <strong><acronym title="Tim Crowley"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> T&*$?%y</span></acronym></strong>  wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; On Oct 16, 3:44 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty &gt;&gt;&gt; dog.com&gt; wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; fargo116 wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; On Oct 16, 2:32 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; dog.com&gt; wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Iarnrod wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; On Oct 16, 12:04 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; dog.com&gt; wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Only if he reads it off a teleprompter after it was written by his <strong>23</strong><br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; speech writers.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; What is the rightards&#8217; issue with use of Teleprompters? <strong>Reagan</strong> used<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &#8216;em, <strong>AWOL</strong> used &#8216;em, they all had speech writers&#8230;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; What accounts for the sudden problem ?<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; So when you picked on Bush you were a <strong>racist</strong>, I see how that works.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Can you tell all of us just how getting mad at the <strong>Drunken Frat Boy</strong><br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; for getting our kids killed for nothing is &#8216;racism&#8217;?<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; S. Olson<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; The same way my ridiculing Obama for his lack of oratory skills without<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; a teleprompter is <strong>racist</strong>.  Surely you aren&#8217;t so stupid that you can&#8217;t<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; see what is so obvious.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Did you know that most modern presidents used TelePrompTers?<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; how did you get so <acronym title="fucking"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> f&*$?%g</span></acronym> stupid.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Yeah, is it congental or did you have to go someplace special?<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; S. Olson<br />
&gt;&gt; So why are you bragging on his reading skills?-<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Since when is acknowledging he knows HOW to read, &#8216;bragging&#8217;?<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; <strong>AGAIN</strong>, is your stupidity congenital or did you have to go someplace<br />
&gt; special?<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; S. Olson</p>
<p>I did attend <strong>Government Socialist</strong> schools.</p>
<p>But back to the real point, that you think Obama&#8217;s reading is impressive.</p>
<p>WHY?</p>
<p>Do you get a tingle up or down your leg when he speaks?</p>
<p>&#8211; </p>
<p>                   *BE VERY <strong>CONCERNED</strong>*</p>
<p>We pledge allegiance to the flag of <strong>Green Peace</strong>, and to the world group<br />
of eco-States for which it stands &#8211; one world tax base, under<br />
government, with <strong>Liberalism</strong> and *welfare* for all.<br />
- Poetic Justice -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/10/19/re-barack-obama-is-not-a-natural-born-us-citizen-and-is-ineligible-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Barack Obama is not a natural born US citizen and is ineligible</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/10/16/re-barack-obama-is-not-a-natural-born-us-citizen-and-is-ineligible-4/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/10/16/re-barack-obama-is-not-a-natural-born-us-citizen-and-is-ineligible-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Army Veteran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Citizen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CONCERNED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Born Citizen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=2459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[fargo116 wrote: &#62; On Oct 15, 5:20 pm, Iarnrod wrote: &#62;&#62; On Oct 15, 5:14 pm, fargo116 wrote: &#62;&#62; &#62;&#62; &#62;&#62; &#62;&#62; &#62;&#62; &#62;&#62;&#62; On Oct 15, 2:56 pm, Iarnrod wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; On Oct 15, 11:26 am, &#8220;US Army Veteran&#8221; wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; The State of Hawaii will soon be forced to reveal the information it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fargo116 wrote:<br />
&gt; On Oct 15, 5:20 pm, Iarnrod  wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt; On Oct 15, 5:14 pm, fargo116  wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; On Oct 15, 2:56 pm, Iarnrod  wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; On Oct 15, <strong>11</strong>:26 am, &#8220;<strong>US</strong> <strong>Army Veteran</strong>&#8221;  wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; The State of Hawaii will soon be forced to reveal the information it used to<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; declare <strong>Barack Obama</strong> a Natural Born citizen. This will be very interesting,<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; considering Obama&#8217;s Father was a <strong>British Citizen</strong>.therefore <strong>Barack Obama</strong> Jr<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; is also a <strong>British Citizen</strong>, and was at <strong>birth</strong> by the very nature of his<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; parentage.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; <strong>Barack Obama</strong>, by legal definitions going back to the 1600&#8242;s is not, was not,<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; and never has been a <strong>Natural Born Citizen</strong>.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; That&#8217;s wrong.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; English common law at the time of the writing of the <strong>Constitution</strong> said<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; the child born of aliens even if just passing through the country is a<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; natural born citizen of that country.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Festus is enraged that the President cannot be bought or sold.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; S. Olson<br />
&gt;&gt; He is also enraged that the president is an articulate and intelligent<br />
&gt;&gt; black man.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; No kidding, Larn. He thinks the president will go &#8220;Lawdy, lawdy,<br />
&gt; lady!!&#8221; in an emergency.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; S. Olson<br />
&gt; </p>
<p>He goes &#8220;A aah a a a AAAAahhhhh  aah ahh   a  aa       a<br />
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa    hhhh   aaaahhhh ahahahaahahahaha   ah hh&#8221;</p>
<p>When he has no teleprompter to tell him what to say.<br />
&#8211; </p>
<p>                   *BE VERY <strong>CONCERNED</strong>*</p>
<p>Obviously <strong>Pelosi</strong> lied&#8230;.  she needs to be prosecuted as a co<br />
conspirator, if someone is guilty of torture then she is also guilty of<br />
participating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/10/16/re-barack-obama-is-not-a-natural-born-us-citizen-and-is-ineligible-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Barack Obama is not a natural born US citizen and is ineligible</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/10/16/re-barack-obama-is-not-a-natural-born-us-citizen-and-is-ineligible-5/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/10/16/re-barack-obama-is-not-a-natural-born-us-citizen-and-is-ineligible-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Army Veteran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Citizen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Slums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Club Med]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GITMO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Born Citizen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wiener Dog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=2458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[fargo116 wrote: &#62; On Oct 15, 5:58 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty dog.com&#62; wrote: &#62;&#62; Iarnrod wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62; On Oct 15, 5:14 pm, fargo116 wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; On Oct 15, 2:56 pm, Iarnrod wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; On Oct 15, 11:26 am, &#8220;US Army Veteran&#8221; wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; The State of Hawaii will soon be forced to reveal the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fargo116 wrote:<br />
&gt; On Oct 15, 5:58 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty  dog.com&gt; wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt; Iarnrod wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; On Oct 15, 5:14 pm, fargo116  wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; On Oct 15, 2:56 pm, Iarnrod  wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; On Oct 15, <strong>11</strong>:26 am, &#8220;<strong>US</strong> <strong>Army Veteran</strong>&#8221;  wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; The State of Hawaii will soon be forced to reveal the information it used to<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; declare <strong>Barack Obama</strong> a Natural Born citizen. This will be very interesting,<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; considering Obama&#8217;s Father was a <strong>British Citizen</strong>.therefore <strong>Barack Obama</strong> Jr<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; is also a <strong>British Citizen</strong>, and was at <strong>birth</strong> by the very nature of his<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; parentage.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; <strong>Barack Obama</strong>, by legal definitions going back to the 1600&#8242;s is not, was not,<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; and never has been a <strong>Natural Born Citizen</strong>.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; That&#8217;s wrong.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; English common law at the time of the writing of the <strong>Constitution</strong> said<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; the child born of aliens even if just passing through the country is a<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; natural born citizen of that country.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Festus is enraged that the President cannot be bought or sold.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; S. Olson<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; He is also enraged that the president is an articulate and intelligent<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; black man.<br />
&gt;&gt; I hadn&#8217;t noticed&#8230;&#8230;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; You say he&#8217;s articulate?<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Bet he could give a more eloquent speech than you could on your best<br />
&gt; day, <strong>Wiener Dog</strong>.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; S. Olson</p>
<p>Only if he reads it off a teleprompter after it was written by his <strong>23</strong><br />
speech writers.</p>
<p>But then&#8230;.. there are plenty of really good actors out there that also<br />
don&#8217;t write their own scripts and have to do a lot of &#8220;takes&#8221; to get<br />
their scene correct.</p>
<p>Obama is an empty suit.</p>
<p>           *Obama*<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to keep Lobbyist out of his Administration.<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to close <strong>GITMO</strong><br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to hire people Qualified to do their job.<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to stop the economic slide into the abyss.<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to stop <strong>Iran</strong> from producing nuclear fissile material<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to stop ear marks.<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to bring *all* the troops home.<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to end the Patriot act.<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to create an effective energy plan.<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to drill for <strong>American Oil</strong>.<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to make coal cleaner.<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to lower taxes for 95%, instead he&#8217;s raising a carbon tax/<strong>VAT</strong> tax.<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to get a dog from the pound.<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to create Bipartisanship in the USA<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to negotiate with <strong>terrorists</strong>/pirates rather than killing them.<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to read &#8220;line by line&#8221; any spending bills before signed<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Failure</strong> to get the Olympics for Chicago<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to get Valerie Jarred big graft for her <strong>Chicago Slums</strong><br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to Talk to his Generals in the <strong>War</strong> Zone.<br />
<strong>Failure</strong> to act decisively on the war in Afghanistan.</p>
<p>&#8211; </p>
<p>                   *BE VERY CONCERNED*</p>
<p>If more Government, solves Liberals every problem, prison must be a<br />
<strong>Socialists</strong> Nirvana&#8230;. and a <strong>Club Med</strong> vacation for Liberals.<br />
- Talk-n-Dog -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/10/16/re-barack-obama-is-not-a-natural-born-us-citizen-and-is-ineligible-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Republican Olympia Snowe Will Vote for Democrats&#8217; Health-Care</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/10/14/re-republican-olympia-snowe-will-vote-for-democrats-health-care-3/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/10/14/re-republican-olympia-snowe-will-vote-for-democrats-health-care-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGAINST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INDEPENDENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympia Snowe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Tue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Sen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Finance Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Majority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TIME]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WASHINGTON]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=2420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lab~rat &#62;:-) wrote: &#62; On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:51:29 -0600, buzz puked: &#62; &#62;&#62; H&#038;*$?%e wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62; From TIME, 10/13/09: &#62;&#62;&#62; http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1929996,00.html?xid=rss-politics &#62;&#62;&#62; &#62;&#62;&#62; (WASHINGTON) — &#62;&#62;&#62; &#62;&#62;&#62; Republican Sen. Olympia Snowe says she will vote for a Democratic &#62;&#62;&#62; health care bill, breaking with her party on President Barack Obama&#8216;s &#62;&#62;&#62; top legislative [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lab~rat &gt;:-) wrote:<br />
&gt; <strong>On Tue</strong>, 13 Oct 2009 15:51:29 -0600, buzz  puked:<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; <acronym title="Harry Hope"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> H&*$?%e</span></acronym> wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; From <strong>TIME</strong>, <strong>10</strong>/13/09:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1929996,00.html?xid=rss-politics<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; (<strong>WASHINGTON</strong>) —<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; <strong>Republican Sen</strong>. <strong>Olympia Snowe</strong> says she will vote for a Democratic<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; health care bill, breaking with her party on President <strong>Barack Obama</strong>&#8216;s<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; top legislative priority.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; The Maine senator kept virtually all of Washington guessing how she<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; would vote until she announced it late in the <strong>Senate Finance Committee</strong><br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; debate Tuesday.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Until then, she told reporters, she had not even let <strong>Senate Majority</strong><br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Leader Harry <strong>Reid</strong>, D-Nev., in on her secret.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; She told her colleagues: &#8220;When history calls, history calls,&#8221; even<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; though she had some criticism of the bill.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; ____________________________________________________<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Harry<br />
&gt;&gt; Snowe just voted herself out of a political career. Voters will remember<br />
&gt;&gt; her vote with the simple-minded dummycrats when they go to the voting<br />
&gt;&gt; booth in the next election.<br />
&gt; I have no problem with independent thought.  Votes that go against the<br />
&gt; norm sometimes are more defining than anything else, and sometimes it<br />
&gt; shows good character.<br />
&gt; </p>
<p>If she is <strong>INDEPENDENT</strong> why is she running as a Republican and taking<br />
Republican <strong>RNC</strong> Money?  She should be an Independent.</p>
<p>&gt; In this case, I see it being a case of voting FOR the bill before<br />
&gt; voting <strong>AGAINST</strong> the bill, but we&#8217;ll see&#8230;<br />
&gt; &#8211;<br />
&gt; lab~rat  &gt;:-)<br />
&gt; Do you want polite or do you want sincere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/10/14/re-republican-olympia-snowe-will-vote-for-democrats-health-care-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Piper Aircraft has been killed by Obama</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/10/13/re-piper-aircraft-has-been-killed-by-obama-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/10/13/re-piper-aircraft-has-been-killed-by-obama-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayn Rand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BILLS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CONCERNED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Profit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lamont Cranston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OWN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piper Aircraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=2377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lamont Cranston wrote: &#62; Beam Me Up Scotty wrote: &#62;&#62; Obama&#8217;s attack on the use of Jets and light aircraft for corporate &#62;&#62; CEO&#8216;s has resulted in the Piper Aircraft company being sold to an &#62;&#62; Asian company and is no longer an American corporation&#8230;. &#62; &#62; Cite? &#62; &#62;&#62; &#62;&#62; Obama is driving Americans [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Lamont Cranston</strong> wrote:<br />
&gt; Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt; Obama&#8217;s attack on the use of Jets and light aircraft for corporate<br />
&gt;&gt; <strong>CEO</strong>&#8216;s has resulted in the <strong>Piper Aircraft</strong> company being sold to an<br />
&gt;&gt; Asian company and is no longer an American corporation&#8230;.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Cite?<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; Obama is driving Americans out of business and losing jobs for<br />
&gt;&gt; America.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Really?<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; http://www.therightperspective.org/2009/<strong>10</strong>/13/obama-stimulus-saved-jobs-report/<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Obama Stimulus Saved Jobs: Report<br />
&gt; Preliminary state data shows that <strong>Barack Obama</strong>’s <strong>US</strong> $787 billion<br />
&gt; Stimulus Package has saved thousands of jobs from being lost, primarily<br />
&gt; in the teaching and labor industries.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Because billions of dollars were sent to stabilize state budgets, this<br />
&gt; prevented massive layoff from occurring, reports The <strong>Associated Press</strong>.<br />
&gt; California alone was able to hold on to 62,000 teachers; Utah reports<br />
&gt; saving 2,600 teaching jobs. In both states, education jobs represented<br />
&gt; about two-thirds of the total stimulus job number.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Other states reporting saved education jobs are Missouri with more than<br />
&gt; 8,500 and Minnesota with more than 5,900. In Michigan, where officials<br />
&gt; said 19,500 jobs have been saved or created, three out of four were in<br />
&gt; education.</p>
<p>Show us all what jobs were saved and track the <strong>money</strong> to them and<br />
demonstrate that the financial numbers are documented and accurate and<br />
prove without a doubt that the &#8220;Obama <strong>money</strong>&#8221; was directly connected to a<br />
job that was being cut and that the job is &#8220;saved&#8221; and is not just a<br />
short term temp job that hinges on government paying for or hiring<br />
someone.</p>
<p>The only job growth is government jobs and those jobs aren&#8217;t self<br />
sustaining.   <strong>Government Jobs</strong> are dependent on the economy and will<br />
disappear when the tax receipts keep falling, because they don&#8217;t earn<br />
their pay.  Government makes <strong>ZERO</strong> income to increase <strong>GDP</strong> or pay it&#8217;s <strong>OWN</strong><br />
<strong>BILLS</strong>, that is what the private sector does.  So without Private sector<br />
Jobs there is no increase in <strong>GDP</strong> and there is no Income/Profit to teh<br />
tax receipts.</p>
<p>&#8211; </p>
<p>                   *BE VERY <strong>CONCERNED</strong>*</p>
<p>&#8220;It is not a right if someone else has to pay for it&#8221;<br />
~<strong>Ayn Rand</strong>~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/10/13/re-piper-aircraft-has-been-killed-by-obama-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: President&#8217;s speech to America&#8217;s school children called &#8216;Marxist</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/09/06/re-presidents-speech-to-americas-school-children-called-marxist/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/09/06/re-presidents-speech-to-americas-school-children-called-marxist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 15:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Army Veteran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chavez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Helms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CONCERNED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEIU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venezuela]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=1840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doorman wrote: &#62; &#8220;Christopher Helms&#8221; wrote in message &#62; news:9871bec7-42b5-4e95-bf29-4ce4a74ec625 @&#038;*$?%k39g2000yqe.googlegroups.com&#8230; &#62; On Sep 6, 4:20 am, &#8220;US Army Veteran&#8221; wrote: &#62;&#62; School districts from Maryland to Texas are fielding angry complaints &#62;&#62; from &#62;&#62; parents opposed to President Barack Obama&#8216;s back-to-school address &#62;&#62; Tuesday - &#62;&#62; forcing districts to find ways to shield students [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doorman wrote:<br />
&gt; &#8220;<strong>Christopher Helms</strong>&#8221;  wrote in message<br />
&gt; news:9871bec7-42b5-4e95-bf29-4ce4a74ec625<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>k39g2000yqe.googlegroups.com&#8230;<br />
&gt; On Sep 6, 4:20 am, &#8220;<strong>US</strong> <strong>Army Veteran</strong>&#8221;  wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt; School districts from Maryland to Texas are fielding angry complaints<br />
&gt;&gt; from<br />
&gt;&gt; parents opposed to President <strong>Barack Obama</strong>&#8216;s back-to-school address<br />
&gt;&gt; Tuesday -<br />
&gt;&gt; forcing districts to find ways to shield students from the speech as<br />
&gt;&gt; conservative opposition to Obama spills into the nation&#8217;s classrooms.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; The White House says Obama&#8217;s address is a sort of pep talk for the<br />
&gt;&gt; nation&#8217;s<br />
&gt;&gt; schoolchildren. But conservative commentators have criticized Obama for<br />
&gt;&gt; trying to &#8220;indoctrinate&#8221; students to his liberal beliefs, and some<br />
&gt;&gt; parents<br />
&gt;&gt; call it an improper mix of politics and education<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; Read more:<br />
&gt;&gt; http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/26744.html<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; The <strong>gun</strong> toting town hall screamers have been ordered to flood school<br />
&gt; districts (not necessarily theirs) with complaints that the evil<br />
&gt; commie Obama wants to indoctrinate their kids with leftist ideas about<br />
&gt; working hard and staying in school.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all about Obama, most Presidents would make it about the kids and<br />
the Nation but in Obama-topia it&#8217;s all about Obama.</p>
<p>That is the Danger, in <strong>Germany</strong> it was all about one man, in N. Korea<br />
it&#8217;s all about one man, in <strong>Iraq</strong> it was all about one man.  In Obama land<br />
it&#8217;s all about one man.  It is a danger and the Public sees it.</p>
<p>Who else is like that, <strong>Venezuela</strong> and Hugo <strong>Chavez</strong>&#8230;..</p>
<p>&gt; And we see the Democrat socialists, <strong>SEIU</strong> and <strong>ACORN</strong> busing in people to<br />
&gt; townhall meetings with printed posters and matching teeshirts because<br />
&gt; there is no real support for their healthcare plans.  There is a real<br />
&gt; silent majority, and they are awake now.</p>
<p>We have to protect the children from the excess of Government and<br />
Socialist who have always tried to indoctrinate the children in every<br />
country they take over.</p>
<p>There has to be <strong>ZERO</strong> tolerance for indoctrination. Drugs are minor<br />
compared the damage that unchecked government can do to the minds of the<br />
school kids.</p>
<p>&#8211; </p>
<p>                   *BE VERY <strong>CONCERNED</strong>*</p>
<p>If you have your head in the sand then your <acronym title="ass"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> a&*$?%s</span></acronym> is a great target.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/09/06/re-presidents-speech-to-americas-school-children-called-marxist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Barack Obama Says He Wants Reparations For Slavery &#8220;Deeds&#8221; Not</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/30/re-barack-obama-says-he-wants-reparations-for-slavery-deeds-not-3/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/30/re-barack-obama-says-he-wants-reparations-for-slavery-deeds-not-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diversity Classes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poetic Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[fargo116 wrote: &#62; On Jul 30, 1:03 pm, Poetic Justice wrote: &#62; &#62;&#62; They have spewed something viewed by many as hate, and now Obama &#62;&#62; himself has weighed in and he thinks the Blue people(police) are &#62;&#62; racist, before he had any evidence and that is stereotyping and &#62;&#62; profiling. &#62; &#62; &#62; &#62; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fargo116 wrote:<br />
&gt; On Jul 30, 1:03 pm, <strong>Poetic Justice</strong>  wrote:<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; They have spewed something viewed by many as hate, and now Obama<br />
&gt;&gt; himself has weighed in and he thinks the Blue people(police) are<br />
&gt;&gt; <strong>racist</strong>, before he had any evidence and that is stereotyping and<br />
&gt;&gt; profiling.</p>
<p>&gt; &gt;<br />
&gt; &gt; He said no such thing, you <acronym title="fucking"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> f&*$?%g</span></acronym> liar.</p>
<p>Yes he did and you can <strong>POST</strong> THAT ==&gt; &#8220;Where the sun don&#8217;t shine&#8221;</p>
<p>&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; Racism lives and Obama embraces it.</p>
<p>&gt; Tell you what, Felcher, why don&#8217;t you post the exact quote where the<br />
&gt; President called the cops &#8216;<strong>racist</strong>.&#8217;?\<br />
&gt; </p>
<p>You are a lying sack of <acronym title="shit"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> s&*$?%t</span></acronym>&#8230;..     I never said the President<br />
&#8221; called the cops &#8216;<strong>racist</strong>.&#8217; &#8221;   But you cleverly cropped the post and<br />
then changed the entire meaning of what was written. That&#8217;s why I put<br />
the <strong>text</strong> back.</p>
<p>Obama is a <strong>racist</strong>, and he treated the police badly due to his racism, I<br />
believe Obama needs to attend some *<strong>Diversity Classes</strong>* and maybe some<br />
*Sensitivity training* to help him better understand his underlying<br />
problems. Problems of hate towards the police and any other groups Obama<br />
consciously or subconsciously treats and reacts to, with disdain and<br />
hate as different, needs to be addressed.</p>
<p>Obama &#8220;thinks&#8221; the police were <strong>racist</strong>, that was evident by his quick<br />
condemnation of the police. But once the truth came to light Obama has<br />
been <strong>eating</strong> crow ever since. The Officer did nothing wrong, and Obama<br />
has to say *both were wrong* in order to pull his own <acronym title="ass"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> a&*$?%s</span></acronym> out of the<br />
fire. Obama is hiding from his statements that prejudged the police<br />
because &#8220;he thinks&#8221; Police are inherently <strong>racist</strong>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll happily say that the building evidence of Obama&#8217;s friends and<br />
Obama&#8217;s own actions are slowly making the case that unfortunately Obama<br />
doesn&#8217;t even understand his own issues with race.  With any luck Obama<br />
will resolve his lack of introspective knowledge some day.</p>
<p>Up till now I had some small amount of respct for you since, you were<br />
nipping at my heels but hadn&#8217;t strayed far from the truth, until now.</p>
<p>With this absolute misleading post, you lost any sign of character, and<br />
I won&#8217;t be treating you with any respect in the <strong>future</strong>.</p>
<p>Having a nemesis wasn&#8217;t all that bothersome and I always knew you were<br />
there and I gave you credit for fighting the good fight and chuckled at<br />
your posts and the silly name calling but this was truly beneath the<br />
person I had hoped you to be. I had dissagreed with you but hadn&#8217;t<br />
pictured you as a worthless <acronym title="shit"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> s&*$?%t</span></acronym> that couldn&#8217;t be trusted to stay within<br />
the boundry of the truth.</p>
<p>&gt; S. Olson<br />
&gt; </p>
<p>P.S. I added the <strong>text</strong> back so that it would be in context with what you<br />
suggested, simply to point out how misleading it was to put words in my<br />
mouth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/30/re-barack-obama-says-he-wants-reparations-for-slavery-deeds-not-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Barack Obama Says He Wants Reparations For Slavery &#8220;Deeds&#8221; Not</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/30/re-barack-obama-says-he-wants-reparations-for-slavery-deeds-not/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/30/re-barack-obama-says-he-wants-reparations-for-slavery-deeds-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Army Veteran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Father Pfleger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fred Oinka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lamont Cranston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LIE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louis Gates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[READ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lamont Cranston wrote: &#62; Poetic Justice wrote: &#62;&#62; Lamont Cranston wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62; Fred Oinka wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; On Jul 29, 11:46 pm, tenjets wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; &#62; On Jul 29, 12:50 pm, &#8220;US Army Veteran&#8221; &#62; &#62; &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; &#62; wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; &#62; &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; &#62; &#62; Watch athttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dISE2QcBuI &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; &#62; &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; &#62; No&#8230;some angry guy interpreted Obama&#8217;s words [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Lamont Cranston</strong> wrote:<br />
&gt; Poetic Justice wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt; <strong>Lamont Cranston</strong> wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; <strong>Fred Oinka</strong> wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; On Jul 29, <strong>11</strong>:46 pm, tenjets  wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &gt; On Jul 29, 12:50 pm, &#8220;<strong>US</strong> <strong>Army Veteran</strong>&#8221; &gt; &gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &gt; wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &gt; &gt; Watch athttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dISE2QcBuI<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &gt; No&#8230;some angry guy interpreted Obama&#8217;s words that way &gt;  &gt; and &#8220;<strong>US</strong><br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &gt; <strong>Army Veteran</strong>,&#8221; being a stupid motherfucker, walks &gt; blindly &gt; down<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &gt; the path&#8230;.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &gt; (had to remove &#8220;alt.culture.alaska,&#8221; among others, &gt; &gt; because of<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &gt; the oxymoron factor)<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Obama is a <strong>racist</strong>.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Please provide evidence that Obama has ever asserted the superiority<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; of one race over all others.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Post it here ===&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; <strong>READ</strong> THE POSTS==&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; They tell you Obama, Rev. Wright, <strong>Father Pfleger</strong>, Sotomayor, Michelle<br />
&gt;&gt; Obama, <strong>Harvard</strong> Professor friend <strong>Louis Gates</strong> and then Obama himself<br />
&gt;&gt; accusing the Boston Police of Racism without any evidence.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; <strong>LIE</strong>.   Nobody accused the Boston police of racism.</p>
<p>To start with <strong>Louis Gates</strong> did&#8230;. then Obama backed up Gates.<br />
Obama said police acted stupidly, for arresting a black man. Obama had<br />
no first <strong>hand</strong> knowledge of whether it was race or legitimate&#8230;  but<br />
Obama made the jump to blame it on a race conflict and blamed the police.</p>
<p>&gt;&gt; Many of Obama&#8217;s &#8220;friends&#8221; are full of hate and it&#8217;s based on race.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Please provide evidence.<br />
&gt; Post it here ===&gt;</p>
<p>Already been done, I don&#8217;t repeat old news unless there is a good<br />
reason. <strong>GO</strong> there==&gt; and read it.</p>
<p>&gt;&gt; They have spewed something viewed by many as hate, and now Obama<br />
&gt;&gt; himself has weighed in and he thinks the Blue people(police) are<br />
&gt;&gt; <strong>racist</strong>, before he had any evidence and that is stereotyping and<br />
&gt;&gt; profiling.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; He said no such thing, you <acronym title="fucking"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> f&*$?%g</span></acronym> liar.</p>
<p>Yes he did and you can <strong>POST</strong> THAT ==&gt; &#8220;Where the sun don&#8217;t shine&#8221;</p>
<p>&gt;&gt; Racism lives and Obama embraces it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/30/re-barack-obama-says-he-wants-reparations-for-slavery-deeds-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Barack Obama Says He Wants Reparations For Slavery &#8220;Deeds&#8221; Not</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/30/re-barack-obama-says-he-wants-reparations-for-slavery-deeds-not-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/30/re-barack-obama-says-he-wants-reparations-for-slavery-deeds-not-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Army Veteran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Father Pfleger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fred Oinka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lamont Cranston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louis Gates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POSTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[READ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lamont Cranston wrote: &#62; Fred Oinka wrote: &#62;&#62; On Jul 29, 11:46 pm, tenjets wrote: &#62;&#62; &#62; On Jul 29, 12:50 pm, &#8220;US Army Veteran&#8221; &#62; wrote: &#62;&#62; &#62; &#62;&#62; &#62; &#62; Watch athttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dISE2QcBuI &#62;&#62; &#62; &#62;&#62; &#62; No&#8230;some angry guy interpreted Obama&#8217;s words that way &#62; and &#8220;US Army &#62;&#62; &#62; Veteran,&#8221; being a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Lamont Cranston</strong> wrote:<br />
&gt; <strong>Fred Oinka</strong> wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt; On Jul 29, <strong>11</strong>:46 pm, tenjets  wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt; &gt; On Jul 29, 12:50 pm, &#8220;<strong>US</strong> <strong>Army Veteran</strong>&#8221; &gt;  wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt; &gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; &gt; &gt; Watch athttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dISE2QcBuI<br />
&gt;&gt; &gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; &gt; No&#8230;some angry guy interpreted Obama&#8217;s words that way &gt; and &#8220;<strong>US</strong> Army<br />
&gt;&gt; &gt; Veteran,&#8221; being a stupid motherfucker, walks blindly &gt; down the<br />
&gt;&gt; &gt; path&#8230;.<br />
&gt;&gt; &gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; &gt; (had to remove &#8220;alt.culture.alaska,&#8221; among others, &gt; because of the<br />
&gt;&gt; &gt; oxymoron factor)<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; Obama is a <strong>racist</strong>.<br />
&gt;</p>
<p>&gt; Please provide evidence that Obama has ever asserted the superiority of<br />
&gt; one race over all others.<br />
&gt; Post it here ===&gt;</p>
<p><strong>READ</strong> THE <strong>POSTS</strong>==&gt;</p>
<p>They tell you Obama, Rev. Wright, <strong>Father Pfleger</strong>, Sotomayor, Michelle<br />
Obama, <strong>Harvard</strong> Professor friend <strong>Louis Gates</strong> and then Obama himself<br />
accusing the Boston Police of Racism without any evidence.</p>
<p>Many of Obama&#8217;s &#8220;friends&#8221; are full of hate and it&#8217;s based on race. They<br />
have spewed something viewed by many as hate, and now Obama himself has<br />
weighed in and he thinks the Blue people(police) are <strong>racist</strong>, before he<br />
had any evidence and that is stereotyping and profiling.</p>
<p>Racism lives and Obama embraces it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/30/re-barack-obama-says-he-wants-reparations-for-slavery-deeds-not-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Who is Hal Turner? And why is Sean Hannity friends with a racist</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/26/re-who-is-hal-turner-and-why-is-sean-hannity-friends-with-a-racist/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/26/re-who-is-hal-turner-and-why-is-sean-hannity-friends-with-a-racist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crap Detector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hal Turner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hannity Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Bergen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Buchanon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saul Alinsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Savage Negroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Supremacists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Buerste wrote: &#62; C&#038;*$?%p Detector wrote &#62;&#62; On Jul 26, 8:44 am, Pogo wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62; Wasn&#8217;t Hannity a war hero? Just like Bush. &#62;&#62;&#62; &#62;&#62;&#62; Word is that he was the first to enlist when we went into Iraq. &#62;&#62; *** &#62;&#62; Did Obama enlist or was his commie, Saul Alinsky inspired community- &#62;&#62; organizing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buerste wrote:<br />
&gt; <strong><acronym title="Crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> C&*$?%p</span></acronym> Detector</strong> wrote<br />
&gt;&gt; On Jul 26, 8:44 am, Pogo  wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Wasn&#8217;t Hannity a war hero?  Just like Bush.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Word is that he was the first to enlist when we went into <strong>Iraq</strong>.<br />
&gt;&gt; ***<br />
&gt;&gt; Did Obama enlist or was his commie, <strong>Saul Alinsky</strong> inspired community-<br />
&gt;&gt; organizing work in Chicago too important?<br />
&gt;&gt; Also he surely would not have wanted to miss any of Rev. Jeremiah<br />
&gt;&gt; Wright&#8217;s anti-American, anti-white and<br />
&gt;&gt; anti-capitalist rants in his <strong>South Chicago</strong> &#8220;church&#8221;.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Who is <strong>Hal Turner</strong>? And why is <strong>Sean Hannity</strong> friends with a <strong>racist</strong> anti-Semite?<br />
&gt; </p>
<p><strong>Sean Hannity</strong> can&#8217;t sign an executive order or start a war&#8230;..   I<br />
really don&#8217;t care who Hannity is, all he can do is deliver a message.</p>
<p>&gt; We previously wrote about <strong>Hal Turner</strong> , and his <strong>racist</strong> campaign against Jews,<br />
&gt; his involvement with <strong>White Supremacists</strong>, his hatred of <strong>African Americans</strong>, his<br />
&gt; calls for assassination of state and federal judges, and his calls for the<br />
&gt; assassination of presidential candidate <strong>Barack Obama</strong> <strong>Clinton</strong>-and-Obama-<br />
&gt; <strong>Economic</strong>-Pla ns Mar-08 . After being <strong>Pat Buchanon</strong>?s state campaign<br />
&gt; coordinator, and being a regular caller to far right-wing radio shows, along<br />
&gt; with appearing as a guest many times on <strong>Sean Hannity</strong>?s show, Turner turned to<br />
&gt; an Internet radio broadcast from his basement. The radio show was very typical<br />
&gt; ranting of his many <strong>racist</strong> theories, especially against African-Americans and<br />
&gt; <acronym title="gays"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> g&*$?%s</span></acronym>.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; This year a man named <strong>Hal Turner</strong> sat before his computer at his suburban home<br />
&gt; in <strong>North Bergen</strong>, New <strong>Jersey</strong>, posting bomb-making tips on his website, hailing<br />
&gt; the firebombing of an apartment containing &#8220;<strong>Savage Negroes</strong>&#8221; and calling for<br />
&gt; the murder of immigrants. &#8220;When enough illegal aliens get killed they will<br />
&gt; stop coming to the country!&#8221; Turner wrote.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Turner was once a prominent activist in New <strong>Jersey</strong>&#8216;s Republican Party. To area<br />
&gt; conservatives, he was best known by his moniker for call-ins to the Sean<br />
&gt; <strong>Hannity Show</strong>, &#8220;Hal from <strong>North Bergen</strong>.&#8221; For years, Hannity offered his top-<br />
&gt; rated radio show as a regular forum for Turner&#8217;s occasionally <strong>racist</strong>, always<br />
&gt; over-the-top rants. Hannity also chatted with him off-air, allegedly offering<br />
&gt; encouragement to Turner as he struggled to overcome a cocaine habit and<br />
&gt; homosexual leanings. Turner has boasted that Hannity once invited Turner and<br />
&gt; his son on to the set of <strong>Fox News</strong>&#8216;s Hannity and Colmes. Today, Turner lurks on<br />
&gt; the fringes of the far right, spouting hate-laced tirades on his webcast radio<br />
&gt; show. Hannity, meanwhile, remains mum about his former alliance with the neo-<br />
&gt; Nazi, homing in instead on the supposed racism of black and Latino <strong>Democrats</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/26/re-who-is-hal-turner-and-why-is-sean-hannity-friends-with-a-racist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: The Messiah&#8217;s approval ratings droping faster than Monica&#8217;s Dress</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/22/re-the-messiahs-approval-ratings-droping-faster-than-monicas-dress/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/22/re-the-messiahs-approval-ratings-droping-faster-than-monicas-dress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 02:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Yorkers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slo wrote: &#62; On Jul 22, 4:48 pm, &#8220;Billary/2009&#8243; &#62; wrote: &#62;&#62; http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobam&#8230; &#62;&#62; &#62;&#62; Barack Obama&#8216;s honeymoon period appears to be coming to an end in &#62;&#62; America as polls have shown his ratings have fallen to their lowest &#62;&#62; point yet. &#62; &#62; The Telegraph is Murdoch fish-wrap. &#62; Why didn&#8217;t the press [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slo wrote:<br />
&gt; On Jul 22, 4:48 pm, &#8220;Billary/2009&#8243;<br />
&gt; wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt; http://www.telegraph.co.<strong>uk</strong>/news/worldnews/northamerica/<strong>usa</strong>/barackobam&#8230;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; <strong>Barack Obama</strong>&#8216;s honeymoon period appears to be coming to an end in<br />
&gt;&gt; America as polls have shown his ratings have fallen to their lowest<br />
&gt;&gt; point yet.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; The Telegraph is Murdoch fish-wrap.  </p>
<p>&gt; Why didn&#8217;t the press ask how Bush<br />
&gt; intended to pay for his wars?  </p>
<p>They did and between the cost of the war and the cost of Body bags for<br />
<strong>New Yorkers</strong> it was a toss up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/22/re-the-messiahs-approval-ratings-droping-faster-than-monicas-dress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Federal Judge Dismisses Birther Bullsh*t</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/17/re-federal-judge-dismisses-birther-bullshit-4/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/17/re-federal-judge-dismisses-birther-bullshit-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Executive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GORDON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INCOME]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Clay Land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LILY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Geitner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poetic Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[So Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stefan Frederick Cook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bet wrote: &#62; Poetic Justice wrote: &#62;&#62; H&#038;*$?%e wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62; http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/292/story/779031.html?storylink=omni_popular &#62;&#62;&#62; &#62;&#62;&#62; &#62;&#62;&#62; Thursday, Jul. 16, 2009 &#62;&#62;&#62; &#62;&#62;&#62; Federal judge dismisses reservist&#8217;s suit questioning Obama&#8217;s &#62;&#62;&#62; presidency &#62;&#62;&#62; &#62;&#62;&#62; BY LILY GORDON &#62;&#62;&#62; &#62;&#62;&#62; A federal judge this morning dismissed the suit filed here by a U.S. &#62;&#62;&#62; Army reservist who says he [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bet wrote:<br />
&gt; <strong>Poetic Justice</strong> wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt; <acronym title="Harry Hope"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> H&*$?%e</span></acronym> wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/292/story/779031.html?storylink=omni_popular<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Thursday, Jul. 16, 2009<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; <strong>Federal</strong> judge dismisses reservist&#8217;s suit questioning Obama&#8217;s<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; presidency<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; BY <strong>LILY</strong> <strong>GORDON</strong><br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; A federal judge this morning dismissed the suit filed here by a U.S.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Army reservist who says he shouldn&#8217;t have to go to <strong>Afghanistan</strong> because<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; he believes <strong>Barack Obama</strong> was never eligible to be president.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; <strong>Judge Clay Land</strong> sided with the defense, which claimed in its response<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; to Maj. <strong>Stefan Frederick Cook</strong>&#8216;s suit, filed July 8 with the U.S.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; District Court for the Middle District of <strong>Georgia</strong>, that Cook’s suit is<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; “moot” in that he already has been told he doesn’t have to go to<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; <strong>Afghanistan</strong>, so the relief he is seeking has been granted.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; &#8220;<strong>Federal</strong> court only has authority of actual cases and controversies,&#8221;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Land said.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; &#8220;The entire action is dismissed for lack of subject matter<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; jurisdiction.&#8221;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; _________________________________________________<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Awwwwwwwwwwww<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Harry<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; <strong>So Obama</strong> will just &#8220;NOT <strong>SEND</strong>&#8221; anyone who sues so Obama won&#8217;t have to<br />
&gt;&gt; prove he is a citizen, to the courts&#8230;..<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; Obama is sure willing to do anything to avoid proving he&#8217;s a citizen in<br />
&gt;&gt; the courts, why is that?<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Interesting. Who&#8217;s next to challenge deployment?<br />
&gt;</p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff;">All it takes to get out of being deployed is to file a suit stating that<br />
Obama needs to prove his citizenship.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff;">I wonder if it will work in <strong>INCOME</strong> <strong>TAX</strong> cases&#8230;.  state that<br />
Obama/Geitner is not authorized to collect tax because Obama is Not<br />
legally the <strong>Chief Executive</strong>.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff;">If you are caught dead to rights, it&#8217;s a technical twist that could toss<br />
in a chance.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/17/re-federal-judge-dismisses-birther-bullshit-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Federal Judge Dismisses Birther Bullsh*t</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/16/re-federal-judge-dismisses-birther-bullshit/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/16/re-federal-judge-dismisses-birther-bullshit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GORDON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Clay Land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LILY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[So Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stefan Frederick Cook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[H&#038;*$?%e wrote: &#62; http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/292/story/779031.html?storylink=omni_popular &#62; &#62; Thursday, Jul. 16, 2009 &#62; &#62; Federal judge dismisses reservist&#8217;s suit questioning Obama&#8217;s &#62; presidency &#62; &#62; BY LILY GORDON &#62; &#62; &#62; A federal judge this morning dismissed the suit filed here by a U.S. &#62; Army reservist who says he shouldn&#8217;t have to go to Afghanistan because [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><acronym title="Harry Hope"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> H&*$?%e</span></acronym> wrote:<br />
&gt; http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/292/story/779031.html?storylink=omni_popular<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Thursday, Jul. 16, 2009<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; <strong>Federal</strong> judge dismisses reservist&#8217;s suit questioning Obama&#8217;s<br />
&gt; presidency<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; BY <strong>LILY</strong> <strong>GORDON</strong><br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; A federal judge this morning dismissed the suit filed here by a U.S.<br />
&gt; Army reservist who says he shouldn&#8217;t have to go to <strong>Afghanistan</strong> because<br />
&gt; he believes <strong>Barack Obama</strong> was never eligible to be president.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; <strong>Judge Clay Land</strong> sided with the defense, which claimed in its response<br />
&gt; to Maj. <strong>Stefan Frederick Cook</strong>&#8216;s suit, filed July 8 with the U.S.<br />
&gt; District Court for the Middle District of <strong>Georgia</strong>, that Cook’s suit is<br />
&gt; “moot” in that he already has been told he doesn’t have to go to<br />
&gt; <strong>Afghanistan</strong>, so the relief he is seeking has been granted.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; &#8220;<strong>Federal</strong> court only has authority of actual cases and controversies,&#8221;<br />
&gt; Land said.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; &#8220;The entire action is dismissed for lack of subject matter<br />
&gt; jurisdiction.&#8221;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; _________________________________________________<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Awwwwwwwwwwww<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Harry</p>
<p><strong>So Obama</strong> will just &#8220;NOT <strong>SEND</strong>&#8221; anyone who sues so Obama won&#8217;t have to<br />
prove he is a citizen, to the courts&#8230;..</p>
<p>Obama is sure willing to do anything to avoid proving he&#8217;s a citizen in<br />
the courts, why is that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/16/re-federal-judge-dismisses-birther-bullshit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Obama birth mystery: More than 1 hospital: Myth-busting website,</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/09/re-obama-birth-mystery-more-than-1-hospital-myth-busting-website/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/09/re-obama-birth-mystery-more-than-1-hospital-myth-busting-website/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 15:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Army Veteran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CANDIDATE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAGE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iarnrod wrote: &#62; On Jul 8, 11:13 pm, buzz wrote: &#62;&#62; US Army Veteran wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62; More than eight months after Barack Obama was elected president, the &#62;&#62;&#62; mystery surrounding his precise birthplace is deepening as the &#62;&#62;&#62; myth-busting website Snopes.com &#8211; along with several news agencies and &#62;&#62;&#62; an Obama community blog &#8211; directly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iarnrod wrote:<br />
&gt; On Jul 8, <strong>11</strong>:13 pm, buzz <b> wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt; <strong>US</strong> <strong>Army Veteran</strong> wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; More than eight months after <strong>Barack Obama</strong> was elected president, the<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; mystery surrounding his precise birthplace is deepening as the<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; myth-busting website Snopes.com &#8211; along with several news agencies and<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; an Obama community blog &#8211; directly contradict the president&#8217;s own claim<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; regarding the hospital in which he was born.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; more at:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=<strong>PAGE</strong>.view&amp;pageId=103306<br />
&gt;&gt; Hussein has yet to prove he is a natural born citizen of the <strong>United States</strong>.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; You musta missed it, but actually Obama is the ONLY president and even<br />
&gt; <strong>CANDIDATE</strong> in the history of the <strong>US</strong> who DID prove he is a natural born<br />
&gt; citizen. He put his <strong>birth</strong> certificate online more than a year ago,<br />
&gt; Case f*ckin&#8217; closed, <acronym title="asswipe"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> a&*$?%e</span></acronym>.</p>
<p>There are a lot of people marked as dead by our Government, and they are<br />
still walking around, they will be sad to know that they are really dead<br />
 and it&#8217;s final because the &#8220;Government&#8221; has th papers to prove it.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/09/re-obama-birth-mystery-more-than-1-hospital-myth-busting-website/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Hey Sarah, Sue Me Please!</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/06/re-hey-sarah-sue-me-please/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/06/re-hey-sarah-sue-me-please/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ALASKA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BLOG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DISCOVERY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Anchorage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honorable Discharge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katie Couric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OATH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Veep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revealing Wingnuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shannyn Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STARBAND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Van Flein]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Billzz wrote: &#62; &#8220;Revealing Wingnuts&#8221; wrote in message &#62; news:5jq4m.5018$Jb1.4135 @&#038;*$?%flpi144.ffdc.sbc.com&#8230; &#62;&#62; &#8220;Billzz&#8221; wrote in message &#62;&#62; news:43ff0$4a522e91$9440b19b$31659@STARBAND.NET&#8230; &#62;&#62;&#62; &#8220;Revealing Wingnuts&#8221; wrote in message &#62;&#62;&#62; news:Erp4m.5006$Jb1.3170 @&#038;*$?%flpi144.ffdc.sbc.com&#8230; &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; &#8220;Mike C.&#8221; wrote in message &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; news:h2t83d$67k$1 @&#038;*$?%news.eternal-september.org&#8230; &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; jl wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; On Jul 6, 11:36 am, &#8220;Revealing Wingnuts&#8221; wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; Shannyn Moore to Sarah Palin: Sue [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Billzz wrote:<br />
&gt; &#8220;<strong>Revealing Wingnuts</strong>&#8221;  wrote in message<br />
&gt; news:5jq4m.5018$Jb1.4135<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>flpi144.ffdc.sbc.com&#8230;<br />
&gt;&gt; &#8220;Billzz&#8221;  wrote in message<br />
&gt;&gt; news:43ff0$4a522e91$9440b19b$31659@<strong>STARBAND</strong>.<strong>NET</strong>&#8230;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; &#8220;<strong>Revealing Wingnuts</strong>&#8221;  wrote in message<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; news:Erp4m.5006$Jb1.3170<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>flpi144.ffdc.sbc.com&#8230;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &#8220;Mike C.&#8221;  wrote in message<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; news:h2t83d$67k$1<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>news.eternal-september.org&#8230;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; jl wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; On Jul 6, <strong>11</strong>:36 am, &#8220;<strong>Revealing Wingnuts</strong>&#8221;  wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; <strong>Shannyn Moore</strong> to <strong>Sarah Palin</strong>: Sue Me! Please!<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Threatened by litigation from Palin camp, <strong>ALASKA</strong> bloggers close<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; ranks, scoff at intimidation effort by cutting-and-running<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Governor&#8230;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Alaska blogger and radio host <strong>Shannyn Moore</strong> isn&#8217;t taking the<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; attempted strong-arming by soon-to-be-former Governor <strong>Sarah Palin</strong><br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; lightly. Moore shot back quickly on her radio show and in the<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; mainstream media on Saturday, in response to Palin&#8217;s Fourth of July<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Declaration of Litigation.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Palin&#8217;s legal threat, issued for her by her private attorney, Thomas<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; <strong>Van Flein</strong>, earlier in the day, was itself in response to Moore, and<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; other Alaska constituents, who publicly detailed long-whispered<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; local rumors of a federal investigation and/or impending indictments<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; against the former <strong>Republican Veep</strong> nominee.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; The <strong>BRAD</strong> <strong>BLOG</strong> broke details of those allegations, citing Moore as<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; one of our sources, on Friday, following Palin&#8217;s manic press<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; conference in which she announced plans to cut and run from her<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; elected position of public service, a year and a half early &#8212;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; seemingly to become a community organizer.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Alaska bloggers quickly circled their wagons in defense of Moore,<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; who spoke out herself over the weekend, describing Palin as a<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &#8220;coward and a bully&#8221; whose defamation lawsuit she would welcome, at<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; a press conference in front of the Governor&#8217;s Anchorage office&#8230;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7280<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Could Sarah handle a deposition if she can&#8217;t handle Letterman or<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; <strong>Katie Couric</strong>?<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Let the <strong>DISCOVERY</strong> process begin &#8211; put &#8220;little shop of horrors&#8221; Palin<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; under <strong>OATH</strong>!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; During the depositions the lawyers can ask any questions they want<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; of the person they are deposing. Could Sarah handle that?<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Let&#8217;s see what she has to say about misuse of public monies, misuse<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; of publc office?<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Sue me <acronym title="bitch"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> b&*$?%h</span></acronym>. Sue me.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s her children that will sue you. Because they won&#8217;t be public<br />
figures.  Get ready sh*t for brains.</p>
<p>Now how will you sue Sarah for trumped up ethics charges?  OOOps you can&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Looks like she once again out smarted you idiots.  She can still make<br />
you look stupid and you won&#8217;t be able to tie up her life in lawsuits and<br />
attack her children, instead she will be letting her kids sue you.<br />
Good`ol Letterman will be paying out the <acronym title="ass"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> a&*$?%s</span></acronym>, next time he slanders her<br />
children.  Now that&#8217;s funny.</p>
<p>Looks like you&#8217;re standing in the pile of dog sh*t.</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; What a horde of rightards out there, and the appellate courts have<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; laughed up their sleeves at every effort to make an issue of President<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; <strong>Barack Obama</strong>&#8216;s Hawaiian <strong>birth</strong> certificate.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; The funny thing is that these are the people who like to argue that the<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; courts are abused by people filing frivolous lawsuits.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; And still refuse to release George Bush&#8217;s military records.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Not so uncommon.  You can&#8217;t find John Kerry&#8217;s or <strong>Jimmy Carter</strong>&#8216;s records<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; either.  In fact I was in Washington when the Department of the Navy was<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; asked and they said that they had already put candidate Carter&#8217;s records<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; away somewhere.  They had a fancy word, which I don&#8217;t recall.<br />
&gt;&gt; Funny, Bush dug up Kerry&#8217;s records for his vultures.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; No he didn&#8217;t.  The records displayed are the &#8220;releasable&#8221; records.  Kerry&#8217;s<br />
&gt; <strong>Honorable Discharge</strong>, signed during the Carter administration, replaces a<br />
&gt; previous discharge, reviewed by a Department of the Navy board.  The<br />
&gt; previous discharge, which common sense says is less than honorable, or it<br />
&gt; would not have to be reviewed, is not releasable, in fact may be destroyed.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/06/re-hey-sarah-sue-me-please/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: WOW!! &#8211; &#8220;GESTAPO TO FINE THOSE WITHOUT HEALTH COVERAGE!!&#8221; &#8211; WOW!!</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/05/re-wow-gestapo-to-fine-those-without-health-coverage-wow-3/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/05/re-wow-gestapo-to-fine-those-without-health-coverage-wow-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 05:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FINE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HEALTH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LITTLE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay Already]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raise Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WASHINGTON]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sid9 wrote: &#62; &#8220;Talk-n-head&#8221; wrote in message &#62; news:QtR3m.8739$K24.278 @&#038;*$?%newsfe19.iad&#8230; &#62;&#62; Sid9 wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62; &#8220;UsenetRanger&#8221; wrote in message &#62;&#62;&#62; news:d6ab8322-eaeb-4cad-b6b1-913c2da568e8 @&#038;*$?%13g2000prl.googlegroups.com&#8230; &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; On Jul 4, 2:54 pm, &#8220;Sid9&#8243; wrote: &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; &#8220;TheLoneRanger100&#8243; wrote in message &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; news:6c0c20b1-8a2e-4483-8e21-97dd6b14e8d3 @&#038;*$?%d36g2000prb.googlegroups.com&#8230; &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; Yup&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;The Democrats are Proposing to FINE people for not having &#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62;&#62; Health Coverage&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..And [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sid9 wrote:<br />
&gt; &#8220;Talk-n-head&#8221;  wrote in message<br />
&gt; news:QtR3m.8739$K24.278<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>newsfe19.iad&#8230;<br />
&gt;&gt; Sid9 wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; &#8220;UsenetRanger&#8221;  wrote in message<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; news:d6ab8322-eaeb-4cad-b6b1-913c2da568e8<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>13g2000prl.googlegroups.com&#8230;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; On Jul 4, 2:54 pm, &#8220;Sid9&#8243;  wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &#8220;TheLoneRanger100&#8243;  wrote in message<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; news:6c0c20b1-8a2e-4483-8e21-97dd6b14e8d3<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>d36g2000prb.googlegroups.com&#8230;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Yup&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;The <strong>Democrats</strong> are Proposing to <strong>FINE</strong> people for not having<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Health Coverage&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..And Secret Police will Enforce The<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Fines&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.Donchaknow&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &#8220;Senate bill fines people refusing health coverage<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; <strong>WASHINGTON</strong>  (<strong>AP</strong>) &#8211; Americans who refuse to buy affordable medical<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; coverage could be hit with fines of more than $1,000 under a health<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; care overhaul bill unveiled Thursday by key Senate <strong>Democrats</strong> looking<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; to fulfill President <strong>Barack Obama</strong>&#8216;s top domestic priority.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; The Congressional Budget <strong>Office</strong> estimated the fines will raise around<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; $36 billion over <strong>10</strong> years. Senate aides said the penalties would be<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; modeled on the approach taken by Massachusetts, which now imposes a<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; fine of about $1,000 a year on individuals who refuse to<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; get coverage. Under the federal legislation, families would pay higher<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; penalties than individuals. &#8221;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &#8220;Fine&#8221; is the `wrong word.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; If you don&#8217;t sign up for health <strong>insurance</strong> there is, the word is, a tax<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; for<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; the uninsured.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; The very same $s you pay today for the uninsured.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Nothing new here.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; You are paying for these people in the form oh higher premiums or<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; higher<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; <strong>taxes</strong><br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; I didn&#8217;t write the Header&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;But if we <strong>Pay Already</strong>, then WHY<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Involve The Government Further?&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;That will only <strong>Raise Costs</strong><br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Even MORE&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.Donchaknow&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Because you pay TOO MUCH and get TOO <strong>LITTLE</strong>.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt; Most other modern industrialized countries do a` lot better than we do.<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; I will never buy health care that is mandatory and the 4th <strong>amendment</strong> say<br />
&gt;&gt; I don&#8217;t have to.  So screw Obama and his Socialist buddies.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Don&#8217;t buy any.<br />
&gt; Pay the tax instead of the premium.<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
Can&#8217;t tax me for exercising my right to privacy.  Can they tax you for<br />
opening your mouth and exercising your free speech?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/05/re-wow-gestapo-to-fine-those-without-health-coverage-wow-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: EPA&#8217;s decision for California is a victory for the people</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/04/re-epas-decision-for-california-is-a-victory-for-the-people/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/04/re-epas-decision-for-california-is-a-victory-for-the-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 16:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Golden State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOOD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOVERNMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lisa Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Gov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[So Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[H&#038;*$?%e wrote: &#62; http://www.insidebayarea.com/opinion/ci_12743269 &#62; &#62; 7/04/2009 &#62; &#62; Editorial: EPA&#8216;s decision for California is a victory for the people &#62; &#62; &#62; THE ENVIRONMENTAL Protection Agency finally gave California the green &#62; light to set limits on greenhouse gases from automobiles. &#62; Who will pay for this new regulation that California will pass? Not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><acronym title="Harry Hope"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> H&*$?%e</span></acronym> wrote:<br />
&gt; http://www.insidebayarea.com/opinion/ci_12743269<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; 7/04/2009<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Editorial: <strong>EPA</strong>&#8216;s decision for California is a victory for the people<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; THE ENVIRONMENTAL <strong>Protection Agency</strong> finally gave California the green<br />
&gt; light to set limits on greenhouse gases from automobiles.<br />
&gt; </p>
<p>Who will pay for this new regulation that California will pass? Not<br />
California, they are broke.</p>
<p>&gt; Of course, it doesn&#8217;t hurt that there&#8217;s a new administrator leading<br />
&gt; the <strong>EPA</strong> and a fairly new administration occupying the <strong>White House</strong>.</p>
<p>Meaning that <strong>Socialism</strong> is better?  We are all comrades fighting the<br />
green fight.</p>
<p>&gt; The decision thankfully reverses a ruling by the Bush administration<br />
&gt; in March 2008 where California requested a Clean <strong>Air</strong> Act waiver to<br />
&gt; impose a limit on emissions from new cars.</p>
<p>Why should California get a waiver?</p>
<p>&gt;<br />
&gt; Thirteen other states and Washington, D.C. had been wanting to follow<br />
&gt; the <strong>Golden State</strong>&#8216;s lead and impose similar standards since 2005 when<br />
&gt; the waiver was originally requested.</p>
<p>So the <strong>EPA</strong> is now abdicating it&#8217;s control to the states?  There will be<br />
50 different, sets of <strong>regulations</strong> for the Auto makers to build for.</p>
<p>&gt; Yet the <strong>EPA</strong> and the Bush administration thought more of the auto<br />
&gt; industry than our environment and stalled the issue.</p>
<p>And look at where the Auto industry is under <strong>BIG</strong> government <strong>Progressives</strong><br />
like Obama/<strong>Pelosi</strong>.(Bankrupt)</p>
<p>&gt; But California stuck with the fight, led by <strong>Republican Gov</strong>. Arnold<br />
&gt; Schwarzenegger, even when it looked hopeless against the previous <strong>GOP</strong><br />
&gt; administration. </p>
<p>It is Hopeless, by passing the California <strong>regulations</strong>, California will<br />
continue to fail and head for bankruptcy. So now they&#8217;ll come back and<br />
ask for the money to replace what they lose by passing such stupid<br />
<strong>regulations</strong>&#8230;.  California politicians are so stupid that they can&#8217;t<br />
even manage their own State.</p>
<p>&gt; President <strong>Barack Obama</strong> announced May 12, with the backing of<br />
&gt; automakers, new federal rules that would require cars and light trucks<br />
&gt; to average 35.5 miles per gallon by 2016, giving new <strong>EPA</strong> Administrator<br />
&gt; <strong>Lisa Jackson</strong> the ammunition to reverse course from her predecessor,<br />
&gt; <strong>Stephen Johnson</strong>, who was clearly following orders from the Bush White<br />
&gt; House as <strong>regulations</strong> were held in limbo. </p>
<p>More <strong>regulations</strong> will only cause more financial harm to the auto<br />
industry.  Like Chrysler, they will all fail again and again as the<br />
<strong>regulations</strong> force the business model to fail over and over.</p>
<p>&gt; California regulators say they will abide by Obama&#8217;s fuel standards.<br />
&gt;</p>
<p>Who cares what they say, they are too stupid to pay their own bill so<br />
listening to them would be a waste of time.</p>
<p>&gt; Perhaps, Obama stole some of California&#8217;s thunder, but while the<br />
&gt; president set specifics on mileage per gallon of gas, California air<br />
&gt; regulators will be in the forefront as to regulate tailpipe emissions.<br />
&gt; Obama said he will set a federal standard in tailpipe emissions in<br />
&gt; 2012, obviously waiting for California to make the first move.<br />
&gt; </p>
<p><strong>So Obama</strong> is doing to all of America what California has done to its<br />
self, run themselves into bankruptcy.</p>
<p>&gt; What this does is open the door toward the new age of automobiles. </p>
<p>The demise of the automobile, get a bicycle.</p>
<p>&gt; While the down economy played a part in making automakers more<br />
&gt; vulnerable to <strong>change</strong>, the inevitable is taking place. </p>
<p>Inevitable <strong>regulations</strong> that destroy the industry.</p>
<p>&gt; Americans are tired of being held hostage by wild fluctuations in gas<br />
&gt; prices, and it&#8217;s obvious our air is not getting any cleaner. </p>
<p>Facts say different.</p>
<p>&gt;<br />
&gt; The auto industry, sooner or later, had to <strong>change</strong> the way it makes<br />
&gt; cars.</p>
<p>and you think bankrupting them with <strong>regulations</strong> is the way to go?</p>
<p>&gt; We don&#8217;t buy that this will harm the auto industry. </p>
<p>As they are filing bankruptcy while you pass even more <strong>regulations</strong>(<strong>GOOD</strong><br />
<strong>GOD</strong> YOU ARE STUPID)</p>
<p>&gt; In fact, the opposite will occur.<br />
&gt; </p>
<p>We are waiting&#8230;.</p>
<p>&gt; Fuel-efficient, attractive cars will bring the public back into<br />
&gt; showrooms.<br />
&gt; </p>
<p>So you think the market will lead the recovery, but you don&#8217;t believe<br />
the market will lead so you want to take over automakers and regulate<br />
them rather than allowing the market fix the problem.</p>
<p>&gt; The spike in popularity of hybrid cars shows that people are willing<br />
&gt; to save fuel costs over car costs, and as California air regulators<br />
&gt; have said, the savings in fuel will outweight approximately a 7<br />
&gt; percent increase in the new cars&#8217; price.</p>
<p>But not the repairs and &#8211; battery replacement that costs upwards of<br />
$1200.  What about the &#8220;pollution&#8221; created in making batteries and all<br />
the electronics involved in the &#8220;green&#8221; hybrids.  When you weight the<br />
benefit of less CO2 and better *in town* mileage does it truly offset<br />
the more complex and industrial Chemically intensive  production and<br />
maintenance of hybrids.</p>
<p>A diesel Jetta will get 52mpg on the highway&#8230;.  find me a hybrid that<br />
will do that.</p>
<p>&gt; The auto industry is already making cars that meet the fuel-efficient<br />
&gt; standards and Charles Territo of the Alliance of Automobile<br />
&gt; Manufacturers said, after Obama&#8217;s announcement, car manufacturers are<br />
&gt; already making plans to meet the new <strong>regulations</strong>.</p>
<p>Which is not the public &#8220;otherwise known as the market&#8221; deciding on whet<br />
is needed but teh <strong>GOVERNMENT</strong> deciding on what&#8217;s available to buy.  That<br />
will NOT &#8220;bring people back&#8221; it will leave them with fewer options and<br />
less interest in any new cars.</p>
<p>&gt; So what&#8217;s the problem?<br />
&gt; </p>
<p><strong>Progressives</strong> and <strong>Socialism</strong>.</p>
<p>&gt; There is none.<br />
&gt; </p>
<p>You are blind, deaf and dumb.</p>
<p>&gt; Obama took away fears that automakers would have to make two sets of<br />
&gt; cars to meet two sets of gas-efficient <strong>regulations</strong>, and now the auto<br />
&gt; industry has a firm direction for the future. </p>
<p>And crated a host of other problems.</p>
<p>&gt; The public will see the cost of cars as a virtual wash with fuel<br />
&gt; savings, and it doesn&#8217;t hurt to clean the air.</p>
<p>NO, they won&#8217;t.</p>
<p>&gt;<br />
&gt; Ultimately, perseverance paid off for Schwarzenegger and California<br />
&gt; regulators and that is a victory for the American public, and<br />
&gt; eventually, the auto industry.</p>
<p>And their continued free fall into the abyss of bankruptcy paints a very<br />
clear picture of their success.</p>
<p>&gt;<br />
&gt; ___________________________________________________<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Great<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; Harry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2009/07/04/re-epas-decision-for-california-is-a-victory-for-the-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

