<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>OutSourcedNews-Group &#187; 10</title>
	<atom:link href="http://outsourcenews.net/ng/tag/10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng</link>
	<description>You don&#039;t need to regulate FREEDOM</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:57:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>If you had HIGH QUALITY DATA and it was from 90% of the planet surface I might accept your data and give weight to your theory, but you don&#8217;t and I can&#8217;t.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/07/if-you-had-high-quality-data-and-it-was-from-90-of-the-planet-surface-i-might-accept-your-data-and-give-weight-to-your-theory-but-you-dont-and-i-cant/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/07/if-you-had-high-quality-data-and-it-was-from-90-of-the-planet-surface-i-might-accept-your-data-and-give-weight-to-your-theory-but-you-dont-and-i-cant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DATA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denying God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drowning Polar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIGH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HVAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QUALITY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 2/7/2012 12:39 PM, HVAC wrote: > On 2/7/2012 10:25 AM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >> >>> No. Observations and temperature reading worldwide show that the Earth&#8217;s >>> mean temp. is rising. It is what is is. >> >> People world wide believe in God and we have the data showing that NO >> culture has ever [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 2/7/2012 12:39 PM, <strong>HVAC</strong> wrote:<br />
> On 2/7/2012 <strong>10</strong>:25 AM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>> No. Observations and temperature reading worldwide show that the Earth&#8217;s<br />
>>> mean temp. is rising.  It is what is is.<br />
>><br />
>> People world wide believe in God and we have the data showing that NO<br />
>> culture has ever proven there is NO God.<br />
><br />
><br />
> What does a belief in god have to do with temp readings?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all just <strong>DATA</strong>.</p>
<p>><br />
><br />
>>> Denying it is just stupid.<br />
>><br />
>> <strong>Denying God</strong> is just stupid<br />
><br />
><br />
> With one huge difference&#8230;Anyone can go and take temp<br />
> readings and compare their results. This repeatability<br />
> is what separates science from religion.<br />
></p>
<p>Then why do I hear the incessant whine of &#8220;ALL the scientists say it&#8217;s a<br />
consensus&#8221;  A consensus is what religion seeks.</p>
<p>>>> We can argue the cause(s). The facts speak for themselves.<br />
>><br />
>> What facts?<br />
>><br />
>> <strong>Drowning Polar</strong> bears?<br />
>><br />
>> Ice melting?<br />
>><br />
>> Ocean level rise?<br />
>><br />
>> <strong>CO2</strong>?<br />
><br />
><br />
> I was discussing temperature readings from around the globe.<br />
> Again, I deal with facts, not political avarice nor prejudice.<br />
></p>
<p><strong>SO</strong> you do know that you have no ocean temps from before about 1900 don&#8217;t<br />
you&#8230;. And you know that most of the worlds temps were not accurate and<br />
not consistently working/reporting and that the <strong>USA</strong> was one place you<br />
have a somewhat consistent and working temperature data set&#8230;.</p>
<p>So 2/3 of the earth is water and you have no 1800 data for that and the<br />
land areas were mostly lacking except the <strong>USA</strong> and Europe, so there is<br />
lets say 50% of the remaining 1/3 so you are using 1/6 of the planet to<br />
extrapolate the global temperatures?   We didn&#8217;t even go to the<br />
Antarctic and take the temperature until after 1900 did we?  The coldest<br />
place on the planet and you have no data but you can tell us the global<br />
temperature?</p>
<p>each time you take a hit on the area or the quality of data you lose<br />
credibility.</p>
<p>So far you want us to all agree that you have accurate temperature data<br />
when in fact the plus or minus error spread is huge.</p>
<p>Then you apply that data to recent data from a satellite&#8230;.?</p>
<p>If you had <strong>HIGH</strong> <strong>QUALITY</strong> <strong>DATA</strong> and it was from 90% of the planet surface I<br />
might accept your data and give weight to your theory, but you don&#8217;t and<br />
I can&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/07/if-you-had-high-quality-data-and-it-was-from-90-of-the-planet-surface-i-might-accept-your-data-and-give-weight-to-your-theory-but-you-dont-and-i-cant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kill you and if Obama can&#8217;t kill you he will tax you&#8230;. What a real peach Obama is.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/07/kill-you-and-if-obama-cant-kill-you-he-will-tax-you-what-a-real-peach-obama-is-3/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/07/kill-you-and-if-obama-cant-kill-you-he-will-tax-you-what-a-real-peach-obama-is-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Tue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoorghis Jurgis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 2/7/2012 10:48 AM, Yoorghis @&#038;*$?%Jurgis.net wrote: > On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:32:51 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: > >>> >>> Except all you can do is recite a couple lines of the constittution, >>> having NO specific prohibition, then unilaterally self-interpreting >>> what it means&#8212;-Tis to laugh. > >> Yes it is a laugh [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 2/7/2012 <strong>10</strong>:48 AM, <a href="mailto:Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net">Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Tue</strong>, 07 Feb 2012 <strong>10</strong>:32:51 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>>><br />
>>> Except all you can do is recite a couple lines of the constittution,<br />
>>> having NO specific prohibition, then unilaterally self-interpreting<br />
>>> what it means&#8212;-Tis to laugh.<br />
><br />
>> Yes it is a laugh that you don&#8217;t understand the concept of how the<br />
>> constitution works&#8230;..<br />
><br />
> The constitution &#8220;works&#8221; by judicial review of enacted law, cases<br />
> brought to review and the ONLY institution given the authority to<br />
> interpret what the constitution means is handed down</p>
<p><strong>SO</strong> why don&#8217;t you get that the Government has NO powers other than those<br />
we assign to them?</p>
<p>Powers are assigned to the federal government BY the constitution.</p>
<p>That means any powers NOT assigned to the government still belong to the<br />
people.</p>
</thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/07/kill-you-and-if-obama-cant-kill-you-he-will-tax-you-what-a-real-peach-obama-is-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>*YOU REALLY DON&#8217;T UNDERSTAND OUR CONSTITUTIONAL CONCEPT DO YOU* ?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/07/you-really-dont-understand-our-constitutional-concept-do-you-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/07/you-really-dont-understand-our-constitutional-concept-do-you-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[43]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CONCEPT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Mon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Tue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REALLY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIGHTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAYS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPENDING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNDERSTAND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoorghis Jurgis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[> On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:43:33 -0700, Yoorghis @&#038;*$?%Jurgis.net wrote: > >> On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:46:58 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty >> wrote: >> >>> On 2/6/2012 11:48 PM, Yoorghis @&#038;*$?%Jurgis.net wrote: >>>> On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:41:25 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Why do you think they tax? >>>>> >>>>> Amendment 10, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> <strong>On Tue</strong>, 07 Feb 2012 09:<strong>43</strong>:33 -0700, <a href="mailto:Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net">Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> <strong>On Tue</strong>, 07 Feb 2012 <strong>10</strong>:46:58 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>> On 2/6/2012 <strong>11</strong>:48 PM, <a href="mailto:Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net">Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
>>>> <strong>On Mon</strong>, 06 Feb 2012 21:41:25 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>>>> </thendestroyeverything>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>>>><br />
>>>>>> Why do you think they tax?<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> Amendment <strong>10</strong>, the powers are delegated and those NOT delegated, well&#8230;.<br />
>>>>> they don&#8217;t just magically become Federal powers.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> That would mean unless there is a <strong>power</strong> authorizing the congress to<br />
>>>>> appropriate the funds, they are NOT constitutionally able to spend any<br />
>>>>> <strong>money</strong> on them.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Utter nonsense of course<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> There is nothing written in the constittution that specifically says<br />
>>>> <strong>taxes</strong> cannot be levied.<br />
>>><br />
>>> You&#8217;re in a &#8220;stupid&#8221; loop&#8230;.<br />
>>><br />
>>> again I need no specific words banning <strong>taxes</strong>, but I was and you were<br />
>>> discussing *<strong>SPENDING</strong>* just above.<br />
>>><br />
>>> And the Spending is limited just as taxing is limited,<br />
>><br />
>> THere is NO wording in the constittuion specifically saying that&#8212;is<br />
>> there?</p>
<p>That is &#8220;MY&#8221; point, when the wording is lacking(NOT THERE) and there is<br />
no <strong>power</strong> delegated, the Federal Government has no <strong>power</strong> for that.  So<br />
you are agreeing with me!</p>
<p>You keep telling me I have nothing in writing banning the spending and I<br />
keep telling you that I don&#8217;t need it because the constitution is<br />
structured so that &#8220;you&#8221; need the wording that delegates the powers you<br />
say exist. I don&#8217;t *need* to have wording that strips Federal powers.</p>
<p>The federal government has NO powers except those;<br />
*powers from the consent of the governed*</p>
<p>That means the <strong>FEDERAL</strong> government MUST have those powers delegated to<br />
it, in the constitution.  So just show me where those <strong>FEDERAL</strong> powers you<br />
say exist, have been delegated.</p>
<p>(DoI)<br />
["We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created<br />
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable<br />
Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of<br />
Happiness.--That to <strong>secure</strong> these rights, Governments are instituted<br />
among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, "]</p>
<p>HERE IT <strong>SAYS</strong>&#8230;.  the reason for government is to *<strong>secure</strong> my <strong>RIGHTS</strong>*</p>
</thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/07/you-really-dont-understand-our-constitutional-concept-do-you-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How many of YOUR physicists on this planet that agree, drive an electric car?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/07/how-many-of-your-physicists-on-this-planet-that-agree-drive-an-electric-car/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/07/how-many-of-your-physicists-on-this-planet-that-agree-drive-an-electric-car/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[23]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbarian Mutual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BEST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Ward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[El Nino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henrik Svensmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Sat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Tue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 2/7/2012 11:35 AM, AGWFacts wrote: > On Sat, 4 Feb 2012 09:51:40 -0800 (PST), Dawlish > wrote: > >> On Feb 4, 5:13 pm, Bill Ward wrote: >>> On Sat, 04 Feb 2012 10:38:20 -0600, Marvin the Martian wrote: >>>> On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:46:01 -0600, Bill Ward wrote: >>> >>>>> On Fri, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 2/7/2012 <strong>11</strong>:35 AM, AGWFacts wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Sat</strong>, 4 Feb 2012 09:51:40 -0800 (<strong>PST</strong>), Dawlish<br />
>
<pjgno1 @hotmail.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> On Feb 4, 5:13 pm, <strong>Bill Ward</strong> <bw ...@ix.REMOVETHISnetcom.com> wrote:<br />
>>> <strong>On Sat</strong>, 04 Feb 2012 <strong>10</strong>:38:20 -0600, Marvin the Martian wrote:<br />
>>>> On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 <strong>11</strong>:46:01 -0600, <strong>Bill Ward</strong> wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:57:43 +0100, Tom P wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> On 02/02/2012 <strong>11</strong>:25 PM, <strong>Bill Ward</strong> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:59:32 +0100, Tom P wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>> On 02/02/2012 03:14 AM, Sparks wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>> On Feb 1, <strong>10</strong>:30 am, AGWFacts<agwfa ...@ipcc.org>   wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>>> <strong>On Tue</strong>, 31 Jan 2012 17:<strong>23</strong>:05 +0100, Tom P<werot ...@freent.dd><br />
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>> On 01/31/2012 04:<strong>11</strong> AM, Sparks wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 30, 8:27 am, AGWFacts<agwfa ...@ipcc.org>     wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <strong>On Sun</strong>, 29 Jan 2012 09:35:53 -0800 (<strong>PST</strong>), Sparks<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <energizedconservat ...@yahoo.com>     wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 29, 8:24 am, AGWFacts<agwfa ...@ipcc.org>     wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <strong>On Sat</strong>, 28 Jan 2012 13:34:18 -0800 (<strong>PST</strong>), Sparks<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <energizedconservat ...@yahoo.com>     wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 28, 12:25 pm, Dawlish
<pjg ...@hotmail.com>     wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 28, 7:00 pm, <strong>Barbarian Mutual</strong><br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <barbarianfinancialservi ...@yahoo.com>     wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 28, 12:50 pm, &#8220;James&#8221;<kingko ...@iglou.com> wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> &#8220;Dawlish&#8221;
<pjg ...@hotmail.com>     wrote in message<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Still, if you think the world is &#8220;getting cooler&#8221; I&#8217;ll<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bet you $<strong>10</strong>,000, today,that a global temperature record<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is set within the next 5 years. Easy money.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have no idea what the global temperature records are.<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When will you stop begging for fraudulent wagers?<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You scared to accept?<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He would be scared shitless. He questions the temperature<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> record, even after <strong>BEST</strong>. Just another stupid denialist,<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignorant, nutcase.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a question, only because I&#8217;m curious. If <strong>CO2</strong> causes<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> global warming, why has there been no further warming since<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the last hottest year on record, 1998? Have <strong>CO2</strong> emissions<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been reduced in the years since 1998?<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If rocks exist, why is the moon is made out of green cheese?<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I asked a sincere question, and it&#8217;s obvious you have no<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer so you<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>> No: you made a false assertion. You did not ask a question.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually, I asked two questions. There were question marks (?)<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> after each question. If you have no answer, just say so. Don&#8217;t<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> play games and think no one notices.<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> To answer your first question<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>> He did not ask a question. He asserted, without evidence, &#8220;there<br />
>>>>>>>>>> has been no further warming since the last hottest year on record,<br />
>>>>>>>>>> 1998.&#8221; That is not a question: it&#8217;s a lie.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> Why would you call the good scientists at the University of East<br />
>>>>>>>>> Anglia liars?<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> &#8220;Based on readings from more than 30,000 measuring stations, the<br />
>>>>>>>>> data was issued last week without fanfare by the Met <strong>Office</strong> and the<br />
>>>>>>>>> University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit. It confirms that<br />
>>>>>>>>> the rising trend in world temperatures ended in 1997.&#8221;<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2093264/Forget-" >http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2093264/Forget-</a><br />
>>>> global-<br />
>>>>>>> warming&#8211;Cycle-25-need-worry-NASA-scientists-right-Thames-freezing-<br />
>>>>>>> again.html<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>> The warming since year<br />
>>>>>>>>>> 1998 is not only well-documented, but it made the headlines of<br />
>>>>>>>>>> many of the world&#8217;s newspapers.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> I just posted an article from one of the world&#8217;s newspapers. It<br />
>>>>>>>>> reports what the good scientists at the University of East Anglia<br />
>>>>>>>>> are saying.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>> if you seriously think that the <strong>UK</strong> <strong>Daily Mail</strong> is a reputable source<br />
>>>>>>>> of <strong>climate</strong> science then everyone here is wasting their time replying<br />
>>>>>>>> to you.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>> Pointing out specifically where you think they are in error would be<br />
>>>>>>> far more convincing.  Otherwise folks will just assume you&#8217;ve<br />
>>>>>>> descended into ad hominem like your comrades in my killfile.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> I don&#8217;t know if you read the article but <strong>David</strong> Rose, the journalist<br />
>>>>>> who wrote it, believes in the sunspot theory. Do you believe in the<br />
>>>>>> sunspot theory as well?<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> Do you mean the cosmic ray nucleation theory?  It sounds plausible, but<br />
>>>>> why would anyones &#8220;belief&#8221; matter?   It&#8217;s evidence that counts.<br />
>>><br />
>>>> Since Svensmark has shown that his theory is consistent with all known<br />
>>>> past data and he didn&#8217;t need to resort to &#8220;computer models&#8221; that are<br />
>>>> little more than curve fitting, yeah, the evidence supports Svensmark&#8217;s<br />
>>>> theory.<br />
>>><br />
>>>> Tom P ridicules a predictive theory and claims that his computer website<br />
>>>> with the simple model based on non-science that doesn&#8217;t predict is<br />
>>>> science.<br />
>>><br />
>>>> What the hell is the point of discussing it with him? He&#8217;s a religious<br />
>>>> believer, not a scientist.<br />
>>><br />
>>> True enough, but he&#8217;s one of the few CAGWers that&#8217;s housebroken.  I take<br />
>>> what I can get.<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> One of the weird things about the article is that the <strong>content</strong><br />
>>>>>> contradicts the headline. It refers to a (<strong>UK</strong>) Met <strong>Office</strong> about<br />
>>>>>> sunspots and then says  &#8220;Yet, in its paper, the Met <strong>Office</strong> claimed<br />
>>>>>> that the consequences now would be negligible – because the impact of<br />
>>>>>> the sun on <strong>climate</strong> is far less than man-made carbon dioxide. Although<br />
>>>>>> the sun’s output is likely to decrease until 2100, ‘This would only<br />
>>>>>> cause a reduction in global temperatures of 0.08C.’ Peter Stott, one<br />
>>>>>> of the authors, said: ‘Our findings suggest a reduction of solar<br />
>>>>>> activity to levels not seen in hundreds of years would be insufficient<br />
>>>>>> to offset the dominant influence of greenhouse gases.’&#8221;<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> And you think mentioning that is somehow bad journalism?  It may be bad<br />
>>>>> science, but if that&#8217;s really what the Met <strong>Office</strong> said, it&#8217;s not bad<br />
>>>>> journalism to report it.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> Of course, <strong>David</strong> Rose can&#8217;t leave it at that, so instead he drags in<br />
>>>>>> <strong>Henrik Svensmark</strong>&#8216;s theory.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> Some might call that &#8220;background&#8221;, or &#8220;context&#8221;.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> Plus he tells the readers &#8220;no warming since 1998&#8243; while quietly<br />
>>>>>> omitting to mention the 1998 <strong>El Nino</strong> event. And so it goes on..<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> Why would he need to mention <strong>El Nino</strong>?  It&#8217;s part of the temperature<br />
>>>>> record, isn&#8217;t it?<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> Here&#8217;s what others have to say about <strong>David</strong> Rose and the <strong>Daily Mail</strong> -<br />
>>>>>> <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2010/dec/08/david-" >http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2010/dec/08/david-</a><br />
>>>>> rose-<strong>climate</strong>-science<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> I don&#8217;t much care what others say unless I can ask questions to<br />
>>>>> understand why they say it.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>> Warming rate since 1998:<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>> y = +0.0288x + +57.918<br />
>>>>>>>>>> R^2 = +0.3868<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>> In fact the world has warmed so much more since 1998, it was much<br />
>>>>>>>>>> more and much faster than most worse-case predictions made by the<br />
>>>>>>>>>> world&#8217;s most-noted climatologists.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>> He lied. Putting a question mark after a lie does not make the lie<br />
>>>>>>>>>> a question.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> I believe the good scientists at the University of East Anglia. Why<br />
>>>>>>>>> don&#8217;t you? What is your agenda?<br />
><br />
> The ugly fact is that &#8220;sparks&#8221; lied: he claimed &#8220;there has been no<br />
> further warming since the last hottest year on record, 1998&#8243; and<br />
> his culy pal here, &#8220;<strong>Bill Ward</strong>,&#8221; has refused to castigate his cult<br />
> pal for lying.<br />
><br />
>> The <strong>OP</strong> gives you your question bilbo &#8211; which you have spent the whole<br />
>> thread squirming away from. Here&#8217;s the very simple question:<br />
>><br />
>> Does <strong>CO2</strong> cause global warming? Does increasing levels of <strong>CO2</strong> warm the<br />
>> atmosphere?<br />
><br />
> All of the physicists on the planet agree that it does. &#8220;Bill<br />
> Ward&#8221; claimed over and over again that they are all wrong.</p>
<p>How many of YOUR physicists on the planet that agree, drive an electric<br />
car?</p>
<p>And producing electric also creates <strong>CO2</strong>&#8230;</p>
</pjg></kingko></barbarianfinancialservi></pjg></energizedconservat></agwfa></energizedconservat></agwfa></werot></agwfa></bw></pjgno1>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/07/how-many-of-your-physicists-on-this-planet-that-agree-drive-an-electric-car/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I don&#8217;t follow lies as if they are laws.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/07/i-dont-follow-lies-as-if-they-are-laws/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/07/i-dont-follow-lies-as-if-they-are-laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbarian Mutual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIGHTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Crowley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 2/7/2012 10:45 AM, Barbarian Mutual wrote: > On Feb 7, 9:26 am, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: >> On 2/4/2012 1:34 PM, T&#038;*$?%y wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Feb 1, 12:24 pm, BeamMeUpScotty >>> wrote: >>>> On 2/1/2012 4:08 PM, Bible Studies with Satan wrote: >> >>>>> BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >> >>>>>> On 2/1/2012 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 2/7/2012 <strong>10</strong>:45 AM, <strong>Barbarian Mutual</strong> wrote:<br />
> On Feb 7, 9:26 am, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>> On 2/4/2012 1:34 PM, <strong><acronym title="Tim Crowley"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> T&*$?%y</span></acronym></strong> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>> On Feb 1, 12:24 pm, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>>> </thendestroyeveryth>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>>>> On 2/1/2012 4:08 PM, Bible Studies with Satan wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> On 2/1/2012 2:05 PM, Ramon F Herrera wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> On Jan 31, 5:41 pm, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>>>>>>> </thendestroyeveryth>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>  > A little <strong>Liberalism</strong> like a little alcohol, can be a good<br />
>>>>>>>  > thing but when either of them take control, they become<br />
>>>>>>>  > self destructive.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>> Our founders were mostly liberal, and would have despised you baggers.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>> <embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/aQn3vBSxdZE&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /><br />
>><br />
>>>>>>> -Ramon<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> <strong>Socialists</strong> are scum that hate the founders and the individual <strong>RIGHTS</strong> the<br />
>>>>>> founders gave us&#8230;.   you work daily to undermine the founders documents.<br />
>><br />
>>>>> <strong>Socialists</strong> love the founding fathers. Conservatives hate America and they hate<br />
>>>>> our <strong>Constitution</strong>. Conservatives love only two things: themselves and <strong>money</strong>.<br />
>><br />
>>>> If so then why is it you that keep changing the constitution written by<br />
>>>> the founders without any amendments?<br />
>><br />
>>> What are you babbling about now?<br />
>><br />
>> You <strong>change</strong> the constitution and you haven&#8217;t amended it in many many years.<br />
>><br />
>> You are the one that hates the constitution wants to <strong>change</strong> it, if you<br />
>> loved the constitution you would follow the constitution and <strong>change</strong> it<br />
>> with Amendments as the constitution requires.<br />
>><br />
>> There is NO <strong>power</strong> given to the courts to create powers in the<br />
>> constitution and NO <strong>power</strong> to write laws was given to the courts.<br />
><br />
> The courts have proven you wrong on this point.  That&#8217;s why the <strong>power</strong><br />
> are being exercised now,  as they have been since before you were even<br />
> born.<br />
><br />
> But you just can&#8217;t get it right, can you Beam.</p>
<p>The unconstitutional <strong>power</strong>, also known as exceeding their jurisdiction,<br />
is NOT proving me wrong it&#8217;s proving me correct, they&#8217;re forced to<br />
violate the constitution to do these things.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have to respect these people as they are violating the<br />
constitution and therefore my <strong>RIGHTS</strong>.</p>
<p>I show those people no respect I&#8217;ll show them nothing but contempt.  You<br />
can lie for them and you can pretend that there are powers that have NOT<br />
been delegated&#8230;.   but I don&#8217;t need your lies.   I can read and see<br />
the truth and it&#8217;s IN the constitution.</p>
<p>Your lies aren&#8217;t even believable well crafted lies.  I don&#8217;t follow lies<br />
as if they are laws.</p>
</thendestroyeveryth>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/07/i-dont-follow-lies-as-if-they-are-laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JIMMY OBAMA ALLOWING MUSLIM DICTATORSHIPS TO GET ESTABLISHED</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/07/jimmy-obama-allowing-muslim-dictatorships-to-get-established/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/07/jimmy-obama-allowing-muslim-dictatorships-to-get-established/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[43]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAIRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chavez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egypt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESTABLISHED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[include]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Republican Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OBAMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religious Intolerance Exposed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation Secretary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 2/5/2012 10:34 AM, Religious Intolerance Exposed wrote: > Egypt sends American workers to trial > > February 5, 2012 > > CAIRO (AP) – Egyptian officials say 43 NGO workers, including 19 > Americans, have been referred to trial before a criminal court for > allegedly being involved in banned activity and illegally receiving [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 2/5/2012 <strong>10</strong>:34 AM, <strong>Religious Intolerance Exposed</strong> wrote:<br />
> <strong>Egypt</strong> sends American workers to trial<br />
><br />
> February 5, 2012<br />
><br />
> <strong>CAIRO</strong> (<strong>AP</strong>) – Egyptian officials say <strong>43</strong> <strong>NGO</strong> workers, including 19<br />
> Americans, have been referred to trial before a criminal court for<br />
> allegedly being involved in banned activity and illegally receiving<br />
> foreign funds.<br />
><br />
> The decision on Sunday by investigating judges is likely to further<br />
> sour relations between <strong>Egypt</strong>&#8216;s military rulers and the <strong>United States</strong>,<br />
> the Arab nation&#8217;s chief western backer for more than 30 years.<br />
> Beside the 19 Americans, there are also five Serbs, two Germans and<br />
> three non-Egyptian Arab nationals among the <strong>43</strong>.<br />
><br />
> The Americans <strong>include</strong> Sam LaHood, the head of the <strong>Egypt</strong> office of the<br />
> Washington-based <strong>International Republican Institute</strong> and the son of<br />
> U.S. <strong>Transportation Secretary</strong> Ray LaHood.</p>
<p>Look into them they will all be <strong>Socialists</strong> and union/<strong>ACORN</strong> types&#8230;.</p>
<p>They are Socialist agitators and they are there to agitate and collapse<br />
the government and set up Socialist groups.</p>
<p>We have the Hugo <strong>Chavez</strong> and Castro Socialist types here in Americas<br />
government and private sector trying to infect and spread their brand of<br />
<strong>Socialism</strong> around the world and Obama is a big part of what&#8217;s behind this<br />
Socialist expansion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/07/jimmy-obama-allowing-muslim-dictatorships-to-get-established/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>*YOU REALLY DON&#8217;T UNDERSTAND OUR CONSTITUTIONAL CONCEPT DO YOU* ?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/07/you-really-dont-understand-our-constitutional-concept-do-you/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/07/you-really-dont-understand-our-constitutional-concept-do-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CONCEPT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EDUCATION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INCOME]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Mon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REALLY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPENDING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNDERSTAND]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoorghis Jurgis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 2/6/2012 11:48 PM, Yoorghis @&#038;*$?%Jurgis.net wrote: > On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:41:25 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: > >>> Why do you think they tax? >> >> Amendment 10, the powers are delegated and those NOT delegated, well&#8230;. >> they don&#8217;t just magically become Federal powers. >> >> That would mean unless there is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 2/6/2012 <strong>11</strong>:48 PM, <a href="mailto:Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net">Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Mon</strong>, 06 Feb 2012 21:41:25 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>>> Why do you think they tax?<br />
>><br />
>> Amendment <strong>10</strong>, the powers are delegated and those NOT delegated, well&#8230;.<br />
>> they don&#8217;t just magically become <strong>Federal</strong> powers.<br />
>><br />
>> That would mean unless there is a <strong>power</strong> authorizing the congress to<br />
>> appropriate the funds, they are NOT constitutionally able to spend any<br />
>> <strong>money</strong> on them.<br />
><br />
> Utter nonsense of course<br />
><br />
> There is nothing written in the constittution that specifically says<br />
> taxes cannot be levied.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re in a &#8220;stupid&#8221; loop&#8230;.</p>
<p>again I need no specific words banning taxes, but I was and you were<br />
discussing *<strong>SPENDING</strong>* just above.</p>
<p>And the Spending is limited just as taxing is limited, by what *is*<br />
delegated.  We don&#8217;t need to list what is *NOT* delegated.</p>
<p>Spending is the same as taxing, government added an <strong>amendment</strong> to<br />
delegate <strong>INCOME</strong> <strong>TAX</strong> to be a constitutional tax.  The congress must amend<br />
the constitution to to delegate the <strong>power</strong> to spend <strong>money</strong> on &#8220;<strong>EDUCATION</strong>&#8221;<br />
and spend <strong>money</strong> to on &#8220;<strong>Social Security</strong>&#8220;.</p>
<p>*YOU <strong>REALLY</strong> <strong>DON</strong>&#8216;T <strong>UNDERSTAND</strong> OUR <strong>CONSTITUTIONAL</strong> <strong>CONCEPT</strong> DO YOU* ?</p>
</thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/07/you-really-dont-understand-our-constitutional-concept-do-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>would you save the life of someone if you were put in a position to require you risk your life,</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/07/would-you-save-the-life-of-someone-if-you-were-put-in-a-position-to-require-you-risk-your-life-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/07/would-you-save-the-life-of-someone-if-you-were-put-in-a-position-to-require-you-risk-your-life-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BILL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MODERATE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POSITION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIGHTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Peterson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Connor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 2/1/2012 7:39 PM, Ron Peterson wrote: > On Jan 31, 10:48 am, &#8220;Clave&#8221; wrote: >> &#8220;Clave&#8221; wrote in message news:&#8230; > >>> Look, your absolute black/white &#8220;abortion is always murder&#8221; position has >>> consequences, one of which is just what I said above. > >> Embarrassed enough to obfuscate the subject line. > > [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 2/1/2012 7:39 PM, <strong>Ron Peterson</strong> wrote:<br />
> On Jan 31, <strong>10</strong>:48 am, &#8220;Clave&#8221; <clav ...@the.monastery.com> wrote:<br />
>> &#8220;Clave&#8221; </clav><clav ...@the.monastery.com> wrote in message news:&#8230;<br />
><br />
>>> Look, your absolute black/white &#8220;<strong>abortion</strong> is always murder&#8221; position has<br />
>>> consequences, one of which is just what I said above.<br />
><br />
>> Embarrassed enough to obfuscate the subject line.<br />
><br />
> I found the following  moderate religious perspective on <strong>abortion</strong>:<br />
> <a href="http://www.elca.org/What-We-Believe/Social-Issues/Social-Statements/Abortion.aspx" >http://www.elca.org/What-We-Believe/Social-Issues/Social-Statements/Abortion.aspx</a><br />
><br />
> But many religious groups seem to hold that evil actions should be<br />
> used to combat what they consider to be wrong.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m neither religious or moderate&#8230;</p>
<p>HOW do you take a <strong>MODERATE</strong> <strong>POSITION</strong> when someone is killing children?</p>
<p>Tell me how you can agree that &#8220;some&#8221; kids should be killed?</p>
<p>*Life* is either a live human or it is NOT&#8230;.    do we execute the half<br />
living because they are less deserving of humanities respect?</p>
<p>If someone murders your family, how will you moderate those actions,<br />
will you say that your family deserved to die because they ate too much<br />
food?  Or the planet was over populated so it was OK that someone<br />
murdered them with a hatchet?</p>
<p>I have never suggested that killing people was the correct way to stop<br />
the killing of babies in a women&#8217;s uterus.</p>
<p>The moral question is, would you save the life of someone if you were<br />
put in a position to require you risk your life, had you just watched<br />
them kill/torture another human life without any remorse?</p>
<p>We have <strong>gun</strong> rights in the *<strong>BILL</strong> of <strong>RIGHTS</strong>*, because it is written in the<br />
constitution but Abortion is NOT in the constitution and needs to be<br />
controlled as it is the killing of human life.</p>
<p>Every where we let Liberals define the issues, they create mythical<br />
<strong>RIGHTS</strong> and frame our actual <strong>RIGHTS</strong> as if they are NOT freedoms but<br />
issues of legitimate controlling of the population.  Except you don&#8217;t<br />
need to regulate <strong>freedom</strong>.</p>
<p>If Einstein was correct and time and<br />
space means there is a multiverse and all things are happening at all<br />
times, you are aborting children that actually live in other universes.<br />
You are killing people that should and do already exist.</p>
<p>Because you know there is a multiverse universe where <strong>abortion</strong> doesn&#8217;t<br />
exist, and they aren&#8217;t killing life in the uterus and that baby is still<br />
alive and grows up to make their world a better place.</p>
<p>If you abort a child in the present time line aren&#8217;t you killing a human<br />
that already exists or has a child of their own that cures cancer in a<br />
<strong>future</strong> time line?  Is the universe a better place when you are altering<br />
that universe by killing a human life.  How many Einstein&#8217;s and Mother<br />
Teresa&#8217;s  have been aborted?   What happens when you do as the<br />
Terminator does in that movie and the Terminator is there to kill <strong>Sarah<br />
Connor</strong>, to stop the son who changes human history?  The show is fiction<br />
the premise of time and space being changed is Science.</p>
<p>Even science suggests that killing your own posterity is against the<br />
constitution and the preamble of the constitution. And Science suggests<br />
that <strong>abortion</strong> is against the Natural order of the universe.</p>
<p>That is&#8230;.  if you believe in Science and time/space as suggested by<br />
Einstein you wouldn&#8217;t kill your kids and kids kids and their kids.</p>
<p>Funny thing is the &#8220;educated&#8221; apparently don&#8217;t grasp the<br />
concepts of Einstein and so they argue for <strong>abortion</strong> because their<br />
omnipotence and their education exposes their attempt to ignore the<br />
science they say they worship.</p>
<p>The self proclaimed &#8220;smart people&#8221; <strong>Progressives</strong> bury their heads in the<br />
sand, they are selfish and more than happy to rationalize the killing of<br />
other humans and altering the universe.  They are shallow.</p>
<p></clav></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/07/would-you-save-the-life-of-someone-if-you-were-put-in-a-position-to-require-you-risk-your-life-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush Knew Bin Laden Murdered in 2001</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/06/bush-knew-bin-laden-murdered-in-2001/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/06/bush-knew-bin-laden-murdered-in-2001/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 04:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President George]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 2/6/2012 10:11 PM, Möebius Pretzel wrote: > Bush Knew Bin Laden Murdered in 2001 > > President George W. Bush knew Osama bin Laden was a CIA agent and in no > way ever involved in 9/11. > > He knew bin Laden personally from family visits and knew bin Laden had > been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 2/6/2012 <strong>10</strong>:<strong>11</strong> PM, Möebius Pretzel wrote:<br />
> Bush Knew <strong>Bin Laden</strong> Murdered in 2001<br />
><br />
> <strong>President George</strong> W. Bush knew Osama bin Laden was a <strong>CIA</strong> agent and in no<br />
> way ever involved in 9/<strong>11</strong>.<br />
><br />
> He knew bin Laden personally from family visits and knew bin Laden had<br />
> been to the White House while living in the <strong>US</strong> under the cover name of<br />
> “Tim Osmon.”</p>
<p>I suppose that Bin laden also played guitar with &#8220;ZZ Top&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/06/bush-knew-bin-laden-murdered-in-2001/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kill you and if Obama can&#8217;t kill you he will tax you&#8230;. What a real peach Obama is.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/06/kill-you-and-if-obama-cant-kill-you-he-will-tax-you-what-a-real-peach-obama-is/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/06/kill-you-and-if-obama-cant-kill-you-he-will-tax-you-what-a-real-peach-obama-is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHEAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Price Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMHO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paradox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unconstitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[>>> On 2/5/2012 4:13 PM, RD Sandman wrote: >>>> >>>> The issue was part and parcel of a greater issue and shows newsgroup >>>> drift. The original issue that I came in on was the individual >>>> mandate where a failure to purchase private insurance could result in >>>> jail time and that, IMHO, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>>> On 2/5/2012 4:13 PM, <strong>RD</strong> Sandman wrote:<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> The issue was part and parcel of a greater issue and shows newsgroup<br />
>>>> drift.  The original issue that I came in on was the individual<br />
>>>> mandate where a failure to purchase private <strong>insurance</strong> could result in<br />
>>>> <strong>jail</strong> time and that, <strong>IMHO</strong>, the federal government does not have the<br />
>>>> constitutional <strong>power</strong> to mandate that an individual citizen must<br />
>>>> purchase a product produced by a private party.</p>
<p>They are forcing you to buy a product in order to be permitted to breath<br />
air in the <strong>USA</strong>&#8230;.   Absolutely <strong>unconstitutional</strong>.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t buy the <strong>insurance</strong> you are fined, if you do buy the<br />
<strong>insurance</strong> you are taxed on it.</p>
<p>That creates a <strong>paradox</strong> where, you are taxed by the government coming or<br />
going.  Obama is going to get his tax one way or the other and that&#8217;s<br />
what he wants. <strong>SO</strong> all Obama really wants is to <strong>TAX</strong> you for the pleasure<br />
of breathing air.  Obama also supports killing little babies in the<br />
woman&#8217;s uterus.  Kill you&#8230; and if Obama can&#8217;t kill you he will tax you<br />
for being alive&#8230;. What a real peach Obama is.</p>
<p>["Q: How would the new excise tax on health <strong>insurance</strong> premiums work?</p>
<p>A: Starting in 2018, a 40 percent excise tax would be imposed on health<br />
<strong>insurance</strong> premiums exceeding $<strong>10</strong>,200 for single coverage and $27,500 for<br />
family coverage. The cost thresholds triggering the tax will be slightly<br />
higher for plans covering retirees or employees in certain high-risk<br />
industries. In 2019, the thresholds would rise to match the increase in<br />
the <strong>Consumer Price Index</strong>, plus one percentage point. In 2020 and<br />
succeeding years, the thresholds will increase to match rises in the<br />
index."]</p>
<p>Keeping that 26 year old child on your health care could cost you a 40%<br />
tax on your entire Family <strong>insurance</strong> since they charge you for your<br />
children and that <strong>insurance</strong> of the older young adults is NOT <strong>CHEAP</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/06/kill-you-and-if-obama-cant-kill-you-he-will-tax-you-what-a-real-peach-obama-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s on unemployment?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/06/whos-on-unemployment-6/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/06/whos-on-unemployment-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commerce Clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMHO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unconstitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 2/6/2012 7:34 PM, Josh wrote: > On 2/6/2012 6:59 PM, P&#038;*$?%s wrote: >> On 2/6/2012 3:10 PM, Josh wrote: >>> On 2/6/2012 5:50 PM, P&#038;*$?%s wrote: >>>> On 2/6/2012 2:14 PM, Josh wrote: >>>>> On 2/6/2012 2:25 PM, RD Sandman wrote: >>>>>> Josh wrote in >>>>>> news:jgn94r$h8f$1 @&#038;*$?%josh.motzarella.org: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2/5/2012 4:13 PM, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 2/6/2012 7:34 PM, Josh wrote:<br />
> On 2/6/2012 6:59 PM, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym> wrote:<br />
>> On 2/6/2012 3:<strong>10</strong> PM, Josh wrote:<br />
>>> On 2/6/2012 5:50 PM, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym> wrote:<br />
>>>> On 2/6/2012 2:14 PM, Josh wrote:<br />
>>>>> On 2/6/2012 2:25 PM, <strong>RD</strong> Sandman wrote:<br />
>>>>>> Josh<user @nowhere.com> wrote in<br />
>>>>>> news:jgn94r$h8f$1<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>josh.motzarella.org:<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> On 2/5/2012 4:13 PM, <strong>RD</strong> Sandman wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> The issue was part and parcel of a greater issue and shows<br />
>>>>>>>> newsgroup<br />
>>>>>>>> drift. The original issue that I came in on was the individual<br />
>>>>>>>> mandate where a failure to purchase private <strong>insurance</strong> could<br />
>>>>>>>> result in<br />
>>>>>>>> <strong>jail</strong> time and that, <strong>IMHO</strong>, the federal government does not have the<br />
>>>>>>>> constitutional <strong>power</strong> to mandate that an individual citizen must<br />
>>>>>>>> purchase a product produced by a private party.<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> I disagree for the very reason alluded to below &#8211; the mandate avoids<br />
>>>>>>> adverse selection.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> You disagree with what? That that was the original issue I came in<br />
>>>>>> on?<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> I disagree with the argument that the <strong>insurance</strong> mandate is<br />
>>>>> <strong>unconstitutional</strong> for the reason noted above.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> And &#8220;adverse selection&#8221; is constitutional how?<br />
>>><br />
>>> The regulation to require <strong>insurance</strong> companies to offer policies without<br />
>>> regard to preexisting conditions is authorized by the <strong>Commerce Clause</strong>.<br />
>><br />
>> No. But we&#8217;ve had that argument.<br />
>><br />
>>> The <strong>insurance</strong> mandate is Necessary and Proper to carry into execution<br />
>>> that regulation (or else, we have adverse selection).<br />
>><br />
>> So?<br />
>><br />
>> Is the mandate necessary for regulation, or to eliminate adverse<br />
>> selection?<br />
><br />
> It&#8217;s necessary for the regulation to work.</p>
<p>Why is that regulation necessary, and why is it necessary to violate the<br />
constitution to design working <strong>regulations</strong>?</p>
<p></user></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/06/whos-on-unemployment-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A few more thoughts on the Obama recovery</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/06/a-few-more-thoughts-on-the-obama-recovery/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/06/a-few-more-thoughts-on-the-obama-recovery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVERAGED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lamont Cranston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neal Boortz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TODAY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 2/6/2012 7:59 PM, Lamont Cranston wrote: > On 2/6/2012 10:00 AM, Neal Boortz wrote: >> To claim the current unemployment rate as a “success” is a disservice to >> every American who is out there and knows the truth about Obama’s grand >> recovery. Just consider the “success” of Obama’s recovery compared to >> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 2/6/2012 7:59 PM, <strong>Lamont Cranston</strong> wrote:<br />
> On 2/6/2012 <strong>10</strong>:00 AM, <strong>Neal Boortz</strong> wrote:<br />
>> To claim the current <strong>unemployment</strong> rate as a “success” is a disservice to<br />
>> every American who is out there and knows the truth about Obama’s grand<br />
>> recovery.  Just consider the “success” of Obama’s recovery compared to<br />
>> that of Ronald <strong>Reagan</strong>’s:<br />
><br />
> LOL!  Unemployment *<strong>AVERAGED</strong>* 7.5% for the eight years that <strong>Reagan</strong> was<br />
> in office.<br />
></p>
<p>How does that make <strong>TODAY</strong>&#8216;S <strong>unemployment</strong> rate better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/06/a-few-more-thoughts-on-the-obama-recovery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s on unemployment?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/06/whos-on-unemployment-5/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/06/whos-on-unemployment-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FREE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gunner Asch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gunner One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the poor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 2/2/2012 8:45 AM, Sid9 wrote: > > &#8220;Gunner Asch&#8221; wrote in message > news:r1aki71empi1so3g6p214ddgltdid48td1 @&#038;*$?%4ax.com&#8230; >> On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:17:10 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty >> wrote: >> >>>> . >>>> Poor people are covered by Obamacare. >>>> Poor people are also covered by Romney care, Obamacare&#8216;s model. >>>> >>>> They&#8217;re covered the same way [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 2/2/2012 8:45 AM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
><br />
> &#8220;<strong>Gunner Asch</strong>&#8221; <gunnerasch @gmail.com> wrote in message<br />
> news:r1aki71empi1so3g6p214ddgltdid48td1<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>4ax.com&#8230;<br />
>> On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:17:<strong>10</strong> -0500, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>> .<br />
>>>> Poor people are covered by <strong>Obamacare</strong>.<br />
>>>> Poor people are also covered by Romney care, <strong>Obamacare</strong>&#8216;s model.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> They&#8217;re covered the same way they are covered now, by Medicaid.<br />
>>><br />
>>> You mean they are covered UNconstitutionally&#8230;.<br />
>><br />
>> If <strong>the poor</strong> people are covered by Medicaid..how come I have a lean on my<br />
>> home?</p>
<p>You aren&#8217;t really poor until the government decides you are poor enough<br />
to fill out government paperwork for a place to live.   They need to<br />
make you poorer so that you can then get &#8220;free&#8221; government<br />
Medicaid/ObamaCare.</p>
<p>ObamaCare already cost Medicare users $500 Billion dollars, how&#8217;s that<br />
<strong>FREE</strong> Medical care working?  Medicare was a separate Payroll tax like<br />
<strong>Social Security</strong> and NOT supposed to go to pay for ObamaCare?</p>
<p>People that vote for free ObamaCare/Medicaid are people that have<br />
already given up on ever earning a living.</p>
<p>>> Gunner<br />
>><br />
>> One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that,<br />
>> in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers<br />
>> and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are<br />
>> not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.<br />
>>                                   <strong>Gunner Asch</strong><br />
><br />
> Your home leans?<br />
> See a building contractor right away.<br />
> It means your shack will collapse soon.<br />
><br />
> You should not sleep in that building one more night.<br />
> The building department will condemn your home is it leans too far right</p>
</thendestroyeverything></gunnerasch></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/06/whos-on-unemployment-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>would you save the life of someone if you were put in a position to require you risk your life,</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/06/would-you-save-the-life-of-someone-if-you-were-put-in-a-position-to-require-you-risk-your-life/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/06/would-you-save-the-life-of-someone-if-you-were-put-in-a-position-to-require-you-risk-your-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MODERATE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POSITION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Peterson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 2/1/2012 7:39 PM, Ron Peterson wrote: > On Jan 31, 10:48 am, &#8220;Clave&#8221; wrote: >> &#8220;Clave&#8221; wrote in message news:&#8230; > >>> Look, your absolute black/white &#8220;abortion is always murder&#8221; position has >>> consequences, one of which is just what I said above. > >> Embarrassed enough to obfuscate the subject line. > > [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 2/1/2012 7:39 PM, <strong>Ron Peterson</strong> wrote:<br />
> On Jan 31, <strong>10</strong>:48 am, &#8220;Clave&#8221; <clav ...@the.monastery.com> wrote:<br />
>> &#8220;Clave&#8221; </clav><clav ...@the.monastery.com> wrote in message news:&#8230;<br />
><br />
>>> Look, your absolute black/white &#8220;<strong>abortion</strong> is always murder&#8221; position has<br />
>>> consequences, one of which is just what I said above.<br />
><br />
>> Embarrassed enough to obfuscate the subject line.<br />
><br />
> I found the following  moderate religious perspective on <strong>abortion</strong>:<br />
> <a href="http://www.elca.org/What-We-Believe/Social-Issues/Social-Statements/Abortion.aspx" >http://www.elca.org/What-We-Believe/Social-Issues/Social-Statements/Abortion.aspx</a><br />
><br />
> But many religious groups seem to hold that evil actions should be<br />
> used to combat what they consider to be wrong.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m neither religious or moderate&#8230;</p>
<p>HOW do you take a <strong>MODERATE</strong> <strong>POSITION</strong> when someone is killing children?</p>
<p>Tell me how you can agree that &#8220;some&#8221; kids should be killed?</p>
<p>*Life* is either a live human or it is NOT&#8230;.    do we execute the half<br />
living because they are less deserving of humanities respect?</p>
<p>If someone murders your family, how will you moderate those actions,<br />
will you say that your family deserved to die because they ate too much<br />
food?  Or the planet was over populated so it was OK that someone<br />
murdered them with a hatchet?</p>
<p>I have never suggested that killing people was the correct way to stop<br />
the killing of babies in a women&#8217;s uterus.</p>
<p>The moral question is, would you save the life of someone if you were<br />
put in a position to require you risk your life, had you just watched<br />
them kill/torture another human life without any remorse?</p>
<p></clav></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/06/would-you-save-the-life-of-someone-if-you-were-put-in-a-position-to-require-you-risk-your-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nobody Understands Debt, particularly right-wing  trolls..Liberalsthinkallmoneyisfree.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/06/nobody-understands-debt-particularly-right-wing-trolls-liberalsthinkallmoneyisfree-3/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/06/nobody-understands-debt-particularly-right-wing-trolls-liberalsthinkallmoneyisfree-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobody Understands Debt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 2/6/2012 10:59 AM, jim wrote: > > > BeamMeUpScotty wrote: > >> >> But I&#8217;m NOT greedy, it&#8217;s enough reward to post the truth&#8230; > > Feel free to begin at any time. I can&#8217;t repeat it all for every head injury that can&#8217;t remember more than 10 seconds ago. But I respect your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 2/6/2012 <strong>10</strong>:59 AM, jim wrote:<br />
><br />
><br />
> BeamMeUpScotty wrote:<br />
><br />
>><br />
>> But I&#8217;m NOT greedy, it&#8217;s enough reward to post the truth&#8230;<br />
><br />
> Feel free to begin at any time.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t repeat it all for every head injury that can&#8217;t remember more<br />
than <strong>10</strong> seconds ago.   But I respect your enthusiasm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/06/nobody-understands-debt-particularly-right-wing-trolls-liberalsthinkallmoneyisfree-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nebraskan Opposition To Keystone XL Is &#8216;Utterly  Irrational&#8217; &gt;&gt;&gt;All you have to do with Nebraska is Bribe them like Obama did to get ObamaCare passed&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/01/nebraskan-opposition-to-keystone-xl-is-utterly-irrational-all-you-have-to-do-with-nebraska-is-bribe-them-like-obama-did-to-get-obamacare-passed-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/01/nebraskan-opposition-to-keystone-xl-is-utterly-irrational-all-you-have-to-do-with-nebraska-is-bribe-them-like-obama-did-to-get-obamacare-passed-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apparently Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utterly Irrational Ah]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/31/2012 10:19 PM, RichTravsky wrote: > BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >> >> On 1/28/2012 7:22 PM, RichTravsky wrote: >>> &#8220;CB@PrayForMe.com&#8221; wrote: >>>> >>>> Gingrich: Nebraskan Opposition To Keystone XL Is &#8216;Utterly Irrational&#8217; >>>> >>> >>> Ah so you admit the Nebraskans don&#8217;t want the pipeline and that they >>> have no say so in the matter. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/31/2012 <strong>10</strong>:19 PM, RichTravsky wrote:<br />
> BeamMeUpScotty wrote:<br />
>><br />
>> On 1/28/2012 7:22 PM, RichTravsky wrote:<br />
>>> &#8220;<strong>CB</strong>@PrayForMe.com&#8221; wrote:<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Gingrich: Nebraskan Opposition To Keystone XL Is &#8216;Utterly Irrational&#8217;<br />
>>>> <embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/k73DDzu64UQ&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /><br />
>>><br />
>>> Ah so you admit the Nebraskans don&#8217;t want the pipeline and that they<br />
>>> have no say so in the matter.<br />
>><br />
>> All you have to do with Nebraska is Bribe them like Obama did to get<br />
>> ObamaCare passed&#8230;.<br />
><br />
> Tell it to the <strong>GOP</strong>.<br />
><br />
>> <strong>Apparently Nebraska</strong> is just a bunch of <acronym title="whores"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> w&*$?%s</span></acronym> that will sell you out at<br />
>> the drop of a hat.<br />
><br />
> Curse them for caring about their drinking water&#8230;</p>
<p>Bullshit&#8230;. they don&#8217;t care about bankrupting the Nation, why would<br />
they care about water.  They can move to Washington D.C. and get all the<br />
benefits they need.  But then you think they would sell out the rest of<br />
us but just NOT sell out themselves, and I have to say that is possible.</p>
<p>>> It&#8217;s great to know that we have a path around/into Nebraska as it were&#8230;.<br />
>> all it takes is cash and a little <strong>extortion</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/01/nebraskan-opposition-to-keystone-xl-is-utterly-irrational-all-you-have-to-do-with-nebraska-is-bribe-them-like-obama-did-to-get-obamacare-passed-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ocean acidification already well beyond natural variability</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/01/ocean-acidification-already-well-beyond-natural-variability/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/01/ocean-acidification-already-well-beyond-natural-variability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 2/1/2012 10:44 AM, erschroedinger @&#038;*$?%gmail.com wrote: > On Feb 1, 8:20 am, Catoni wrote: >> On Jan 31, 9:04 pm, Sam Wormley wrote: >> >>> Ocean acidification already well beyond natural variability >> >>>> Ocean acidification already well beyond natural variability >>>> Ocean acidification entails a decrease in the pH of ocean water as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 2/1/2012 <strong>10</strong>:44 AM, <a href="mailto:erschroedinger<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>gmail.com">erschroedinger<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>gmail.com</a> wrote:<br />
> On Feb 1, 8:20 am, Catoni <caton ...@sympatico.ca> wrote:<br />
>> On Jan 31, 9:04 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml ...@gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>> Ocean acidification already well beyond natural variability<br />
>><br />
>>>> Ocean acidification already well beyond natural variability<br />
>>>> Ocean acidification entails a decrease in the pH of ocean water as the carbonate that buffers it is consumed. That carbonate does more than just maintain pH, though. Lots of marine organisms, from plankton to mollusks to coral, use it to build shells and skeletons. As the buffer is depleted, the saturation state of carbonate minerals like calcite (and its polymorph aragonite) decreases, making it more difficult for organisms to incorporate them. In most areas of the surface ocean, calcite and aragonite are supersaturated, making it easy for organisms to build shells and skeletons. In undersaturated water, the equilibrium tilts the other way, and dissolution of these structures becomes possible.<br />
>><br />
>>> See: Ocean acidification already well beyond natural variability<br />
>><br />
>> Uhmm&#8230;pH level in the oceans is almost at the lowest it has ever been<br />
>> in the last 500 million years&#8230;. as is atmospheric levels of <strong>CO2</strong>.<br />
>><br />
>>   What do you think the level of pH was in the far past ?  How about<br />
>> during the age of the dinosaurs&#8230;<br />
><br />
> Who cares?  Just like I don&#8217;t care what the O2 level was then, or the<br />
> humidity, or the <strong>UV</strong> index.<br />
><br />
><br />
>> when atmospheric level of <strong>CO2</strong> was<br />
>> about 2000 ppm ? ?   Oh&#8230; by the way&#8230; corals and bivalves developed<br />
>> long before even those years&#8230;.  hundreds of millions of years ago<br />
>> when <strong>CO2</strong> levels were extremely high&#8230; like about 7000ppm<br />
><br />
> (1) Lots of sea life, including corals, died out.<br />
> (2) The ones that didn&#8217;t had time to adapt or move, as the <strong>change</strong> was<br />
> a lot slower than it is today.</p>
<p>More likely is that under sea volcanoes that release acid are more<br />
active&#8230;.</p>
<p></sworml></caton></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/01/ocean-acidification-already-well-beyond-natural-variability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s on unemployment?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/01/whos-on-unemployment-3/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/01/whos-on-unemployment-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LIAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAFTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stormin Mormon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unconstitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 2/1/2012 10:22 AM, P&#038;*$?%s wrote: > On 2/1/2012 6:07 AM, Sid9 wrote: >> >> &#8220;Stormin Mormon&#8221; wrote in message >> news:X%aWq.33364$N_7.20651 @&#038;*$?%news.usenetserver.com&#8230; >>> My pleasure. And, when I&#8217;m elected, we&#8217;ll repeal Obama care, reduce >>> taxes, >>> restore federal spending to the levels of several years ago, and >>> prosperity >>> will return to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 2/1/2012 <strong>10</strong>:22 AM, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym> wrote:<br />
> On 2/1/2012 6:07 AM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
>><br />
>> &#8220;<strong>Stormin Mormon</strong>&#8221; <cayoung61 ***spamblock<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>hotmail.com> wrote in message<br />
>> news:X%aWq.33364$N_7.20651<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>news.usenetserver.com&#8230;<br />
>>> My pleasure. And, when I&#8217;m elected, we&#8217;ll repeal Obama care, reduce<br />
>>> <strong>taxes</strong>,<br />
>>> restore federal spending to the levels of several years ago, and<br />
>>> prosperity<br />
>>> will return to this great nation of the <strong>United States</strong>.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Christopher A. Young<br />
>>> Learn more about Jesus<br />
>>> <a href="http://www.lds.org" >www.lds.org</a><br />
>>> .<br />
>>><br />
>>> <yoorghis @Jurgis.net> wrote in message<br />
>>> news:m1ehi7pn2ur4iib9qrfu2demfrstgm6geq<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>4ax.com&#8230;<br />
>>><br />
>>> Sure glad fuckwits like you epitomize the conservative political<br />
>>> spectrum<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>> .<br />
>> .<br />
>> .<br />
>> Any candidate who says he will repeal <strong>Obamacare</strong> is a plain out liar.<br />
>> The next president, who ever it is, will not have the <strong>power</strong> to do so.<br />
>><br />
>> So, make note of which candidates are liars.<br />
><br />
> A president can&#8217;t repeal legislation, only congress can.</p>
<p>that is correct&#8230;..  but we need a president that will sign that<br />
legislation into law.</p>
<p><strong>Clinton</strong> said he would NOT sign <strong>NAFTA</strong> and then he did it once he was<br />
elected, <strong>Clinton</strong> was a <strong>LIAR</strong> from the beginning.</p>
<p>><br />
> A president can, however, choose not to enforce legislation, essentially<br />
> nullifying it for his term.</p>
<p>Unconstitutional and is an impeachable violation of his/her oath of<br />
office.   They are supposed to enforce all laws&#8230;  and the constitution<br />
says all laws must be enforced equally.</p>
<p>Obama should have been impeached already.</p>
<p></yoorghis></cayoung61></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/01/whos-on-unemployment-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>*YOU ARE A SOCIALIST AND A RACIST AND SEXIST*</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/01/you-are-a-socialist-and-a-racist-and-sexist/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/01/you-are-a-socialist-and-a-racist-and-sexist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BLACK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HATE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MEN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIGHTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEXIST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialist #]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 2/1/2012 10:09 AM, jim wrote: > > > BeamMeUpScotty wrote: > >> >> The regulations needed are regulations to stop the government and the >> politicians from coercing the mortgage markets&#8230;. >> >> Because that&#8217;s where the problems began. > > You have to be a blind racist to believe that. > There is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 2/1/2012 <strong>10</strong>:09 AM, jim wrote:<br />
><br />
><br />
> BeamMeUpScotty wrote:<br />
><br />
>><br />
>> The <strong>regulations</strong> needed are <strong>regulations</strong> to stop the government and the<br />
>> politicians from coercing the mortgage markets&#8230;.<br />
>><br />
>> Because that&#8217;s where the problems began.<br />
><br />
> You have to be a blind racist to believe that.<br />
> There is no evidence only hatred making people<br />
>  believe that</p>
<p>You blurt it out but it&#8217;s NOT even part of the conversation&#8230;.   you<br />
brought up racism because you are &#8220;the&#8221; racist here.</p>
<p>The government is the problem, you are the racist and sexist that<br />
supports *<strong>Social Security</strong> that forcibly takes <strong>money</strong> from people* with<br />
<strong>DNA</strong> that will cause them to die young and you give it to someone that<br />
will live longer&#8230;.  You redistribute the hard work of those programmed<br />
to die young and give it to those programmed to live longer fuller lives?</p>
<p>How Racist and Sexist and <strong>DNA</strong> discriminating is that?</p>
<p>You <strong>HATE</strong> Blacks because they die younger and you hate Men that die<br />
younger and you really hate <strong>BLACK</strong> <strong>MEN</strong> who don&#8217;t live long and you<br />
violate their <strong>RIGHTS</strong> and take their <strong>money</strong> and give it to others whose<br />
<strong>DNA</strong> is programmed to live to be older&#8230;..</p>
<p>*YOU ARE A <strong>SOCIALIST</strong> AND A <strong>RACIST</strong> AND <strong>SEXIST</strong>*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/02/01/you-are-a-socialist-and-a-racist-and-sexist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBO Admits Obama&#8217;s Real Unemployment Rate Is 10%</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/31/cbo-admits-obamas-real-unemployment-rate-is-10/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/31/cbo-admits-obamas-real-unemployment-rate-is-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Tue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viejo Vizcacha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoorghis Jurgis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/31/2012 5:50 PM, Yoorghis @&#038;*$?%Jurgis.net wrote: > On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:02:54 -0800 (PST), Viejo Vizcacha > wrote: > >> Since Obama has a secure job until a year from now, his unemployment >> rate is zero. >> >> However, if you are talking about the real US unemployment rate, it >> has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/31/2012 5:50 PM, <a href="mailto:Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net">Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Tue</strong>, 31 Jan 2012 09:02:54 -0800 (<strong>PST</strong>), <strong>Viejo Vizcacha</strong><br />
> <nats_uglyman @yahoo.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> Since Obama has a <strong>secure</strong> job until a year from now, his <strong>unemployment</strong><br />
>> rate is zero.<br />
>><br />
>> However, if you are talking about the real <strong>US</strong> <strong>unemployment</strong> rate, it<br />
>> has been masked since the Johnson years, each administration adding<br />
>> tweeks and conditions to make it look a lot lower than what it<br />
>> actually is.<br />
><br />
> Only superfically so<br />
><br />
> The <strong>unemployment</strong> figures are figured about the same regardless of<br />
> administration<br />
></p>
<p><strong>SO</strong> the Obama promise of <strong>change</strong> was a rouse&#8230;?   Obama actually is happy<br />
to mislead us all with fudged numbers like all the other<br />
administrations?   That&#8217;s really no better than changing it to hide his<br />
own failure.</p>
<p></nats_uglyman></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/31/cbo-admits-obamas-real-unemployment-rate-is-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Explain how you are being fair to me?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/30/explain-how-you-are-being-fair-to-me/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/30/explain-how-you-are-being-fair-to-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gunner Asch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Randal Scripter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/30/2012 11:39 AM, Randal Scripter wrote: > On 1/30/2012 8:05 AM, Gunner Asch wrote: >> On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 22:11:54 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty >> wrote: >> >>> >>>> On 1/29/2012 10:56 AM, Jeff M wrote: >>>> >>>>> Your claim that the Scandinavian countries have moved away from their >>>>> socialist traditions is also utterly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/30/2012 <strong>11</strong>:39 AM, <strong>Randal Scripter</strong> wrote:<br />
> On 1/30/2012 8:05 AM, <strong>Gunner Asch</strong> wrote:<br />
>> <strong>On Sun</strong>, 29 Jan 2012 22:<strong>11</strong>:54 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com>  wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>><br />
>>>> On 1/29/2012 <strong>10</strong>:56 AM, Jeff M wrote:<br />
>>>><br />
>>>>> Your claim that the Scandinavian countries have moved away from their<br />
>>>>> socialist traditions is also utterly false.<br />
>>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>> <strong>Socialism</strong> is failing everywhere it is tried.<br />
>><br />
>> Indeed it is.<br />
><br />
> Yes, agreed:  the socialistic medical care that gave you your bypass<br />
> surgery and stroke care was definitely a failure for society, as society<br />
> would have been improved by your death.</p>
<p>Living longer is NOT a &#8220;measure&#8221; of a societies worthiness.</p>
<p>Are you that inane and vapid?</p>
<p>I know I won&#8217;t live as long as others, due to my grand father and my<br />
father&#8217;s history, does that make me a failure?</p>
<p>Yet you would Use the Socialist plan of <strong>Social Security</strong> to strip me of<br />
my income via a tax, and then give it to people that &#8220;determined by<br />
their and my <strong>DNA</strong>&#8221;  will live longer than I will.</p>
<p>Hoe is that a success in society, you steal from me who will by race and<br />
sex and <strong>DNA</strong> be proven to die younger than most, and give what you stole<br />
to other sexes and races that have <strong>DNA</strong> that will keep them alive longer.</p>
<p>*WHY IS THAT <strong>FAIR</strong>*</p>
<p>Explain how you are being *fair* to me?</p>
<p>You <strong>Socialists</strong> like to use the word fair&#8230;.  Now you can defend your<br />
tax and your fairness.</p>
</thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/30/explain-how-you-are-being-fair-to-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Explain how you are being fair to me?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/30/explain-how-you-are-being-fair-to-me/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/30/explain-how-you-are-being-fair-to-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gunner Asch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/30/2012 11:39 AM, Randal Scripter wrote: > On 1/30/2012 8:05 AM, Gunner Asch wrote: >> On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 22:11:54 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty >> wrote: >> >>> >>>> On 1/29/2012 10:56 AM, Jeff M wrote: >>>> >>>>> Your claim that the Scandinavian countries have moved away from their >>>>> socialist traditions is also utterly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/30/2012 <strong>11</strong>:39 AM, <strong>Randal Scripter</strong> wrote:<br />
> On 1/30/2012 8:05 AM, <strong>Gunner Asch</strong> wrote:<br />
>> <strong>On Sun</strong>, 29 Jan 2012 22:<strong>11</strong>:54 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com>  wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>><br />
>>>> On 1/29/2012 <strong>10</strong>:56 AM, Jeff M wrote:<br />
>>>><br />
>>>>> Your claim that the Scandinavian countries have moved away from their<br />
>>>>> socialist traditions is also utterly false.<br />
>>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>> <strong>Socialism</strong> is failing everywhere it is tried.<br />
>><br />
>> Indeed it is.<br />
><br />
> Yes, agreed:  the socialistic medical care that gave you your bypass<br />
> surgery and stroke care was definitely a failure for society, as society<br />
> would have been improved by your death.</p>
<p>Living longer is NOT a &#8220;measure&#8221; of a societies worthiness.</p>
<p>Are you that inane and vapid?</p>
<p>I know I won&#8217;t live as long as others, due to my grand father and my<br />
father&#8217;s history, does that make me a failure?</p>
<p>Yet you would Use the Socialist plan of <strong>Social Security</strong> to strip me of<br />
my income via a tax, and then give it to people that &#8220;determined by<br />
their and my <strong>DNA</strong>&#8221;  will live longer than I will.</p>
<p>Hoe is that a success in society, you steal from me who will by race and<br />
sex and <strong>DNA</strong> be proven to die younger than most, and give what you stole<br />
to other sexes and races that have <strong>DNA</strong> that will keep them alive longer.</p>
<p>*WHY IS THAT <strong>FAIR</strong>*</p>
<p>Explain how you are being *fair* to me?</p>
<p>You <strong>Socialists</strong> like to use the word fair&#8230;.  Now you can defend your<br />
tax and your fairness.</p>
</thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/30/explain-how-you-are-being-fair-to-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From a National Security view point, Obama is selling out America to OPEC isn&#8217;t he?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/30/from-a-national-security-view-point-obama-is-selling-out-america-to-opec-isnt-he-3/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/30/from-a-national-security-view-point-obama-is-selling-out-america-to-opec-isnt-he-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 05:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America His]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COMPANY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eddie Haskell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FORIEGN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OIL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Thu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoorghis Jurgis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/29/2012 8:12 AM, Bob LeChevalier wrote: > BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>> On 1/19/2012 10:00 AM, Yoorghis @&#038;*$?%Jurgis.net wrote: >>>> On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 09:56:28 -0600, &#8220;Eddie Haskell&#8220; >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Yeah, and I hear they are considering what color it should be as well. >>>>> That&#8217;ll take a three year study so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/29/2012 8:12 AM, Bob LeChevalier wrote:<br />
> BeamMeUpScotty
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>>> On 1/19/2012 <strong>10</strong>:00 AM, <a href="mailto:Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net">Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
>>>> <strong>On Thu</strong>, 19 Jan 2012 09:56:28 -0600, &#8220;<strong>Eddie Haskell</strong>&#8220;<rrhv @wqpm.com><br />
>>>> wrote:<br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>>> Yeah, and I hear they are considering what color it should be as well.<br />
>>>>> That&#8217;ll take a three year study so cowards can kick the can on behalf of<br />
>>>>> extreme leftist environmentalists that have a stranglehold on <strong>US</strong> energy<br />
>>>>> production while we continue to rely on hostile sources and piss<br />
>>>>> <strong>money</strong> down<br />
>>>>> a rat hold on alternatives that the market rejects because smart<br />
>>>>> people like<br />
>>>>> Hussein know better how to run an economy  than 300 million<br />
>>>>> <strong>collective</strong> minds<br />
>>>>> acting in a free market. The history of the <strong>United States</strong> proves that.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Why should WE allow our <strong>environment</strong> to be jepoardized, so a <strong>FORIEGN</strong><br />
>>>> <strong>OIL</strong> <strong>COMPANY</strong> can make obscene profits?<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> WE don&#8217;t get any cheaper gas or oil&#8212;Prices are set world wide, not<br />
>>>> on local supply or <strong>demand</strong>.<br />
>><br />
>> Yet we are told that <strong>OPEC</strong> is manipulating their own price by setting<br />
>> their volume.<br />
><br />
> To some extent.<br />
><br />
>> So if we have a huge pipe with billions of barrels of oil flowing to us,<br />
>> <strong>OPEC</strong> will NOT be as able to effect the price by withholding oil will they.<br />
><br />
> Of course they will.  Keystone would have a maximum capacity of less<br />
> than a million barrels a day (and no guarantee that this capacity will<br />
> ever be utilized), which is little more than noise level on the<br />
> international market.<br />
><br />
> World oil consumption is something like 60 million barrels a day. <strong>OPEC</strong><br />
> produces something like 24 million barrels a day.  The <strong>US</strong> uses<br />
> something like 19 million barrels a day.<br />
><br />
> And Keystone oil wouldn&#8217;t be our oil, in any event.  The Canadians own<br />
> it.<br />
><br />
>>From a <strong>National Security</strong> view point, Obama is selling out America to<br />
>> <strong>OPEC</strong> isn&#8217;t he?<br />
><br />
> No more than approving it would be selling out America to <strong>Canada</strong>.<br />
> Keystone is irrelevant to national security.  It&#8217;s just a way for<br />
> Canadians to make more <strong>money</strong> from their oil.<br />
><br />
> lojbab</p>
<p>So you think going to war over oil is NOT a National security<br />
problem and it is irrelevant?</p>
<p>If the Iranians close the shipping lanes it would be nice to have other<br />
options besides going to war with <strong>Iran</strong>, and that Canadian oil is an<br />
option, and the pipeline would make it a viable option.</p>
<p>With the pipeline we can close the Iranian ports and we won&#8217;t<br />
necessarily miss the oil, it becomes their problem if they try to shut<br />
down the shipping lanes, we won&#8217;t be forced to fight to open the<br />
shipping lanes if we have all that oil from a pipeline.</p>
<p>You blindly support Obama the <strong>Harvard</strong> Village Idiot.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just plain pitifully stupid.  He hates you, and he hates America!<br />
His own policies prove that he hates us.  How many young college age<br />
American kids will die for oil thanks to Obama and his hate?</p>
<p></rrhv></thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/30/from-a-national-security-view-point-obama-is-selling-out-america-to-opec-isnt-he-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;The oil will get here regardless of the rout and shipping method, Obama wastes millions of gallons of diesel fuel, and didn&#8217;t care one little bit.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/29/the-oil-will-get-here-regardless-of-the-rout-and-shipping-method-obama-wastes-millions-of-gallons-of-diesel-fuel-and-didnt-care-one-little-bit-3/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/29/the-oil-will-get-here-regardless-of-the-rout-and-shipping-method-obama-wastes-millions-of-gallons-of-diesel-fuel-and-didnt-care-one-little-bit-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 04:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[23]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HYPOCRITE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INFLATE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William Sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TIRES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/23/2012 1:56 PM, CB @&#038;*$?%PrayForMe.com wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:10:18 -0800 (PST), plainolamerican > wrote: > >> On Jan 23, 9:03 am, &#8220;C&#8230;@PrayForMe.com&#8221; wrote: >>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:30:00 -0700, Hisler wrote: >>>> On 1/20/2012 6:10 PM, 2849 Dead wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:13:16 -0700, Hisler [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>23</strong>/2012 1:56 PM, <a href="mailto:CB<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>PrayForMe.com">CB<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>PrayForMe.com</a> wrote:<br />
> On Mon, <strong>23</strong> Jan 2012 07:<strong>10</strong>:18 -0800 (<strong>PST</strong>), plainolamerican<br />
>
<plainolamerican @gmail.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> On Jan <strong>23</strong>, 9:03 am, &#8220;C&#8230;@PrayForMe.com&#8221; <c ...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:<br />
>>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:30:00 -0700, Hisler <his ...@<acronym title="cocks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%s</span></acronym>.net> wrote:<br />
>>>> On 1/20/2012 6:<strong>10</strong> PM, 2849 Dead wrote:<br />
>>>>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:13:16 -0700, Hisler wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> On 1/20/2012 2:53 PM, plainolamerican wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> On Jan 20, 3:20 pm, &#8220;Ramon F. CabanaBoy&#8221;
<pissingoffthel ...@yahoo.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>> Attn RATs: You&#8217;re Fukked!<br />
>>>>>>>> Unions Representing Blue-Collar <strong>Working</strong> Americans Rip Obozo A New<br />
>>>>>>>> <acronym title="Asshole"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> A&*$?%e</span></acronym> Over The <strong>Keystone Pipeline</strong><br />
>>>>>>>> The president of the half-million member Laborers&#8217; International <strong>Union</strong><br />
>>>>>>>> of North America has categorized the Obama Administration&#8217;s January 18<br />
>>>>>>>> rejection of the construction of the 1,700-mile Keystone XL pipeline<br />
>>>>>>>> as &#8220;politics at its worst,&#8221; indicating a potential hit to the Obama<br />
>>>>>>>> re- election campaign from his union base. Here are the<br />
>>>>>>>> details…http://news.yahoo.com/union-pipeline-decision-politics-<br />
>>>>> worst-00430271&#8230;<br />
>>>>>>>> &#8212;&#8211;<br />
>>>>>>>> Whoops!<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>> O&#8217;s worst mistake yet<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> Since when did oil companies need the approval of the President to build<br />
>>>>>> pipelines?<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> They don&#8217;t.  They need the approval of the State Department, and<br />
>>>>> Department of the Interior.  When they cross state or international<br />
>>>>> borders.<br />
>>><br />
>>>> Then the pipeline will go to <strong>British Columbia</strong> and the oil will ship to<br />
>>>> <strong>China</strong>.  I&#8217;m not sure where it would have been shipped to from the Gulf<br />
>>>> of Mexico.  It doesn&#8217;t sound like the oil would benefit American consumers.</p>
<p>If oil was forced to be piped to the ocean it can pollute<br />
Alaska/<strong>Washington State</strong> like the spill at <strong>Prince William Sound</strong>.   When<br />
loaded into a tanker ship. Remember they sink and spill.</p>
<p>The stupidity of the <strong>ECO</strong>-Socialists is incredible.</p>
<p>If they wanted to stop a spill the first thing is to get control of the<br />
project NOT chase them away to do it without critical expertise and<br />
oversight.</p>
<p>Then you make sure the project is environmentally safe and it would also<br />
have been a National security win/win.</p>
<p>The only problems so far are, Obama isn&#8217;t getting a cut of the money for<br />
his re-election and his pals in the unions and ACORN and others.  And<br />
Obama&#8217;s big problem is that it cuts out the planned redistribution of<br />
<strong>wealth</strong> that has been planned for moving <strong>wealth</strong> from America to the rest<br />
of the world.</p>
<p>Interesting also is that the oil can then be shipped from <strong>BC</strong> the same as<br />
oil is shipped from Valdez Alaska to American ports and the question<br />
becomes, what will that do to the PRICE of oil and all that transporting<br />
will also increase the odds of an oil spill&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>So the oil will get to America regardless and we will still have the oil<br />
spill problem, the oil will get here regardless of the rout and shipping<br />
method, the *<strong>ECO</strong>-<strong>SOCIALISTS</strong>* are just plain stupid.</p>
<p>The wasted Diesel will be in the millions if NOT a billion gallons, so<br />
Obama with the stroke of a pen will choose to be wasteful and cause<br />
incredible inefficiency and waste while the <strong>EPA</strong> sits on the side line<br />
and allows Obama to kill gas mileage and allow the real industrial gas<br />
Mileage to be crushed while he tells you to <strong>INFLATE</strong> YOUR <strong>TIRES</strong> to get<br />
more gas mileage in your car.    Why is it so important to save fuel if<br />
Obama doesn&#8217;t follow his own imperative.   Where are the regulation that<br />
force Obama to be more efficient and waste less fuel like he has put on us?</p>
<p>Obama passes <strong>EPA</strong> <strong>regulations</strong> that force you to buy cars that get better<br />
gas mileage and at the same time Obama is going to force the oil<br />
producers to use more fuel to get their oil to the refineries and that<br />
means that you expend more energy getting your fuel to the users. And<br />
all it took was the stroke of a pen.</p>
<p>*What a <strong>HYPOCRITE</strong>*</p>
<p><strong>Liberalism</strong> is doing what <strong>Liberalism</strong> does best, its destroying its host.</p>
</pissingoffthel></his></c></plainolamerican>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/29/the-oil-will-get-here-regardless-of-the-rout-and-shipping-method-obama-wastes-millions-of-gallons-of-diesel-fuel-and-didnt-care-one-little-bit-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From a National Security view point, Obama is selling out America to OPEC isn&#8217;t he?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/29/from-a-national-security-view-point-obama-is-selling-out-america-to-opec-isnt-he-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/29/from-a-national-security-view-point-obama-is-selling-out-america-to-opec-isnt-he-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 04:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COMPANY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eddie Haskell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FORIEGN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OIL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Thu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoorghis Jurgis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/29/2012 8:12 AM, Bob LeChevalier wrote: > BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>> On 1/19/2012 10:00 AM, Yoorghis @&#038;*$?%Jurgis.net wrote: >>>> On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 09:56:28 -0600, &#8220;Eddie Haskell&#8220; >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Yeah, and I hear they are considering what color it should be as well. >>>>> That&#8217;ll take a three year study so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/29/2012 8:12 AM, Bob LeChevalier wrote:<br />
> BeamMeUpScotty
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>>> On 1/19/2012 <strong>10</strong>:00 AM, <a href="mailto:Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net">Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
>>>> <strong>On Thu</strong>, 19 Jan 2012 09:56:28 -0600, &#8220;<strong>Eddie Haskell</strong>&#8220;<rrhv @wqpm.com><br />
>>>> wrote:<br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>>> Yeah, and I hear they are considering what color it should be as well.<br />
>>>>> That&#8217;ll take a three year study so cowards can kick the can on behalf of<br />
>>>>> extreme leftist environmentalists that have a stranglehold on <strong>US</strong> energy<br />
>>>>> production while we continue to rely on hostile sources and piss<br />
>>>>> <strong>money</strong> down<br />
>>>>> a rat hold on alternatives that the market rejects because smart<br />
>>>>> people like<br />
>>>>> Hussein know better how to run an economy  than 300 million<br />
>>>>> <strong>collective</strong> minds<br />
>>>>> acting in a free market. The history of the <strong>United States</strong> proves that.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Why should WE allow our <strong>environment</strong> to be jepoardized, so a <strong>FORIEGN</strong><br />
>>>> <strong>OIL</strong> <strong>COMPANY</strong> can make obscene profits?<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> WE don&#8217;t get any cheaper gas or oil&#8212;Prices are set world wide, not<br />
>>>> on local supply or <strong>demand</strong>.<br />
>><br />
>> Yet we are told that <strong>OPEC</strong> is manipulating their own price by setting<br />
>> their volume.<br />
><br />
> To some extent.<br />
><br />
>> So if we have a huge pipe with billions of barrels of oil flowing to us,<br />
>> <strong>OPEC</strong> will NOT be as able to effect the price by withholding oil will they.<br />
><br />
> Of course they will.  Keystone would have a maximum capacity of less<br />
> than a million barrels a day (and no guarantee that this capacity will<br />
> ever be utilized), which is little more than noise level on the<br />
> international market.<br />
><br />
> World oil consumption is something like 60 million barrels a day. <strong>OPEC</strong><br />
> produces something like 24 million barrels a day.  The <strong>US</strong> uses<br />
> something like 19 million barrels a day.<br />
><br />
> And Keystone oil wouldn&#8217;t be our oil, in any event.  The Canadians own<br />
> it.<br />
><br />
>>From a <strong>National Security</strong> view point, Obama is selling out America to<br />
>> <strong>OPEC</strong> isn&#8217;t he?<br />
><br />
> No more than approving it would be selling out America to <strong>Canada</strong>.<br />
> Keystone is irrelevant to national security.  It&#8217;s just a way for<br />
> Canadians to make more <strong>money</strong> from their oil.<br />
><br />
> lojbab</p>
<p>So &#8220;blojob&#8221; you thing going to war over oil is NOT a National security<br />
problem and it&#8217;s irrelevant?</p>
<p>If the Iranians close the shipping lanes it would be nice to have other<br />
options besides going to war with <strong>Iran</strong>, and that Canadian is an option<br />
and the pipeline makes it a viable option.</p>
<p>With the pipeline we can close the Iranian ports and we won&#8217;t miss the<br />
oil, it becomes their problem if they try to shut down the shipping<br />
lanes, we won&#8217;t need to fight to open the shipping lanes if we all that<br />
oil from a pipeline.</p>
<p>You blindly support Obama the <strong>Harvard</strong> Village Idiot.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just plain pitifully stupid.  He hates you!</p>
<p></rrhv></thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/29/from-a-national-security-view-point-obama-is-selling-out-america-to-opec-isnt-he-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Officers justified in invading home without warrant, court rules</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/28/officers-justified-in-invading-home-without-warrant-court-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/28/officers-justified-in-invading-home-without-warrant-court-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 00:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gunner Asch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Sat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/28/2012 10:45 AM, Gunner Asch wrote: > On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 08:41:44 -0500, Josh wrote: > >>> >>> The cops built their perception of imminent danger based on a rumor, an >>> &#8220;unusual&#8221; response, and a person turning and running. >>> >>> No sane person is going to construe that as an indication [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/28/2012 <strong>10</strong>:45 AM, <strong>Gunner Asch</strong> wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Sat</strong>, 28 Jan 2012 08:41:44 -0500, Josh <user @nowhere.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>>><br />
>>> The cops built their perception of imminent danger based on a rumor, an<br />
>>> &#8220;unusual&#8221; response, and a person turning and running.<br />
>>><br />
>>> No sane person is going to construe that as an indication of imminent<br />
>>> danger, even when taken in totality.<br />
>><br />
>> 13 judges evaluated the case and <strong>11</strong> of them, including all 9 <strong>SCOTUS</strong><br />
>> judges, are insane.<br />
><br />
><br />
> Well you are just going to have to deal with it, tough as it is.</p>
<p>the day is coming that someone will deal with it&#8230;   the courts keep<br />
pretending to have the <strong>power</strong> to rewrite the constitution.</p>
<p>They may end up cooking their own goose.  Americans went to war before,<br />
I predict they will again.</p>
<p></user></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/28/officers-justified-in-invading-home-without-warrant-court-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>That means that those who support Social Security are supporting racism.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/28/that-means-that-those-who-support-social-security-are-supporting-racism/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/28/that-means-that-those-who-support-social-security-are-supporting-racism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Simpson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BILL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CUT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RACE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RECOMMENDATION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIGHTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SECURITY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPENDING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unconstitutional]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/27/2012 9:12 PM, lsrlts wrote: > On 1/27/2012 12:55 PM, Sid9 wrote: >> >> &#8220;Nickname unavailable&#8221; wrote in message >> news:df4e1aa7-611b-4ec7-a2f5-195b9257264a @&#038;*$?%k28g2000yqc.googlegroups.com&#8230; >>> On Jan 26, 8:02 pm, lsrlts wrote: >>>> On 1/26/2012 3:38 PM, Nickname unavailable wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> > On Jan 26, 10:27 am, lsrlts wrote: >>>> >> On 1/25/2012 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/27/2012 9:12 PM, lsrlts wrote:<br />
> On 1/27/2012 12:55 PM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
>><br />
>> &#8220;Nickname unavailable&#8221; <video61 @tcq.net> wrote in message<br />
>> news:df4e1aa7-611b-4ec7-a2f5-195b9257264a<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>k28g2000yqc.googlegroups.com&#8230;<br />
>>> On Jan 26, 8:02 pm, lsrlts <d ...@g.nail> wrote:<br />
>>>> On 1/26/2012 3:38 PM, Nickname unavailable wrote:<br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> > On Jan 26, <strong>10</strong>:27 am, lsrlts</d><d ...@g.nail> wrote:<br />
>>>> >> On 1/25/2012 6:39 PM, Nickname unavailable wrote:<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> >>>> The &#8220;supply-side&#8221; model of economics was a failure.<br />
>>>> >>> as it did twice in the past.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> >>http://www.fiscalcommission.gov/sites/fiscalcommission.gov/files/docu&#8230;<br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> >> <strong>RECOMMENDATION</strong> 1.2: <strong>CUT</strong> BOTH <strong>SECURITY</strong> AND <strong>NON</strong>-<strong>SECURITY</strong> <strong>SPENDING</strong>.<br />
>>>> >> Establish firewall between the two categories through 2015, and >><br />
>>>> require<br />
>>>> >> equal percentage cuts from both sides.<br />
>>>> >> One of the Commission s guiding principles is that everything must<br />
>>>> be >> on<br />
>>>> >> the table. In order to achieve real spending discipline, Congress<br />
>>>> and<br />
>>>> >> the President must be willing to cut excess spending wherever they<br />
>>>> >> find it.<br />
>>>> >> Past budget agreements in 1990, 1993, and 1997 established firewalls<br />
>>>> >> between defense and non-defense expenditures, requiring savings from<br />
>>>> >> both categories to keep spending levels below the caps.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> > yet, you cling to what is the problem. its a mis-understanding, or a<br />
>>>> > complete stupidity of how capitalism works.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> That&#8217;s our blue ribbon fiscal panel, go whine to them.<br />
>>><br />
>>> who says they are smart? many of them sound like you. many of them<br />
>>> added to our problems we face today.<br />
>><br />
>> <strong>Alan Simpson</strong>?<br />
><br />
><br />
><br />
> <a href="http://www.fiscalcommission.gov/sites/fiscalcommission.gov/files/documents/TheMomentofTruth12_1_2010.pdf" >http://www.fiscalcommission.gov/sites/fiscalcommission.gov/files/documents/TheMomentofTruth12_1_2010.pdf</a><br />
><br />
><br />
> <strong>RECOMMENDATION</strong> 1.2: <strong>CUT</strong> BOTH <strong>SECURITY</strong> AND <strong>NON</strong>-<strong>SECURITY</strong> <strong>SPENDING</strong>.<br />
> Establish firewall between the two categories through 2015, and require<br />
> equal percentage cuts from both sides.<br />
> One of the Commission’s guiding principles is that everything must be on<br />
> the table. In order to achieve real spending discipline, Congress and<br />
> the President must be willing to cut excess spending wherever they find it.<br />
> Past budget agreements in 1990, 1993, and 1997 established firewalls<br />
> between defense and non-defense expenditures, requiring savings from<br />
> both categories to keep spending levels below the caps.<br />
><br />
><br />
><br />
> Why do those recommendations bother you big spender types so much?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a good idea except it ignores that Social Security is<br />
<strong>unconstitutional</strong>, <strong>SS</strong> discriminates against people/races with <strong>DNA</strong> that<br />
leads to shorter lives whereas all the <strong>money</strong> collected from that shorter<br />
lived people/races, is then redistributed to those that live longer.<br />
This is all based on <strong>DNA</strong> just as <strong>RACE</strong> is based on <strong>DNA</strong>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s NOT simply discrimination which violates this quote&#8230; &#8220;nor deny to<br />
any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.&#8221;<br />
&#8230;IN OUR <strong>BILL</strong> OF <strong>RIGHTS</strong>.</p>
<p>That means that those who support Social Security are supporting racism,<br />
because discriminationg on the basis of <strong>DNA</strong> is the same as<br />
discrimination <strong>DNA</strong> resulting in skin color and the billion more codes in<br />
the <strong>DNA</strong> that not only make us individuals but also make us a race or<br />
gender.</p>
<p>You first need to close/privatize or divest from government all the<br />
<strong>unconstitutional</strong> programs and spending.  Then you cut the ones that<br />
*are* constitutional and do it equally as you suggested.</p>
<p></d></video61></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/28/that-means-that-those-who-support-social-security-are-supporting-racism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&gt; Democrats Want Less revenue but more POWER.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/27/democrats-want-less-revenue-but-more-power/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/27/democrats-want-less-revenue-but-more-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[37]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eddie Haskell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lamont Cranston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mikey Poo Flannigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REVENUE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/26/2012 6:57 PM, Lamont Cranston wrote: > On 1/26/2012 10:25 AM, Eddie Haskell wrote: >> &#8220;Matt&#8221; wrote in message >> news:9486ad7e-2763-4100-8ecf-9f2176396ac9 @&#038;*$?%e27g2000vbu.googlegroups.com&#8230; >> On Jan 26, 7:18 am, &#8220;C&#8230;@PrayForMe.com&#8221; wrote: >>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:37:08 -0800 (PST), Matt >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> wrote: >>>> On Jan 25, 10:14 am, &#8220;Eddie [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/26/2012 6:57 PM, <strong>Lamont Cranston</strong> wrote:<br />
> On 1/26/2012 <strong>10</strong>:25 AM, <strong>Eddie Haskell</strong> wrote:<br />
>> &#8220;Matt&#8221;<matttelles @sprynet.com>  wrote in message<br />
>> news:9486ad7e-2763-4100-8ecf-9f2176396ac9<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>e27g2000vbu.googlegroups.com&#8230;<br />
>> On Jan 26, 7:18 am, &#8220;C&#8230;@PrayForMe.com&#8221;<c ...@PrayForMe.com>  wrote:<br />
>>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:<strong>37</strong>:08 -0800 (<strong>PST</strong>), Matt<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>> <matttel ...@sprynet.com>  wrote:<br />
>>>> On Jan 25, <strong>10</strong>:14 am, &#8220;<strong>Eddie Haskell</strong>&#8220;<yh ...@saq.com>  wrote:<br />
>>>>> &#8220;Matt&#8221;<matttel ...@sprynet.com>  wrote in message<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> news:1c2dcb78-2551-4349-8744-376a9f18eb10<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>h12g2000yqg.googlegroups.com&#8230;<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> On Jan 25, 9:56 am, &#8220;<strong>Eddie Haskell</strong>&#8220;<yh ...@saq.com>  wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> Despite the democrat lie that they want &#8220;revenues&#8221; (Goebbels code for<br />
>>>>>> tax<br />
>>>>>> hikes) what they really want is less revenues via destructive Marxist<br />
>>>>>> class<br />
>>>>>> warfare.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> Here&#8217;s the inarguable proof:<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> <embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/54jr3Ceu894&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /><br />
>>>>>> Not likely to click on a link you post, <strong>Mikey Poo Flannigan</strong>.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> Then <acronym title="fuck"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> f&*$?%k</span></acronym> off.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> -<strong>Eddie Haskell</strong><br />
>>><br />
>>>> Poor Mikey Poo. Slammed right and left and looking stupider with each<br />
>>>> passing moment.<br />
>>><br />
>>>> Sad really.<br />
>>><br />
>>>> But do tell us, <strong>Mikey Poo Flannigan</strong> .. how does the government get<br />
>>>> revenues?<br />
>>><br />
>>> It&#8217;s never been a matter of revenue, it&#8217;s always been a spending<br />
>>> problem.</p>
<p><strong>Democrats</strong> raising <strong>taxes</strong> will end in less *<strong>REVENUE</strong>*, so they obviously<br />
just want the <strong>power</strong> that comes with the new tax that punishes who they<br />
want to dominate&#8230;..</p>
<p>If <strong>Democrats</strong> wanted more *<strong>REVENUE</strong>* they would cut <strong>taxes</strong> to the bone and<br />
spending to match and cut <strong>regulations</strong> as part of cutting government<br />
spending because regulation is government spending private sector <strong>money</strong><br />
without calling it a tax.</p>
<p></yh></matttel></yh></matttel></c></matttelles></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/27/democrats-want-less-revenue-but-more-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Left to their own inefficient behavior, GM and the union there would have put themselves out of business.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/27/left-to-their-own-inefficient-behavior-gm-and-the-union-there-would-have-put-themselves-out-of-business/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/27/left-to-their-own-inefficient-behavior-gm-and-the-union-there-would-have-put-themselves-out-of-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[23]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/27/2012 12:25 AM, Nickname unavailable wrote: > On Jan 26, 7:57 pm, lsrlts wrote: >> On 1/26/2012 3:23 PM, Nickname unavailable wrote: >> >>> On Jan 25, 5:42 pm, lsrlts wrote: >>>> On 1/25/2012 10:09 AM, Sid9 wrote: >> >>>>> private business covers up their inefficiencies. >> >>>> Government buys $600 hammers. >> >>> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/27/2012 12:25 AM, Nickname unavailable wrote:<br />
> On Jan 26, 7:57 pm, lsrlts <d ...@g.nail> wrote:<br />
>> On 1/26/2012 3:<strong>23</strong> PM, Nickname unavailable wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>> On Jan 25, 5:42 pm, lsrlts</d><d ...@g.nail>  wrote:<br />
>>>> On 1/25/2012 <strong>10</strong>:09 AM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>> private business covers up their inefficiencies.<br />
>><br />
>>>> Government buys $600 hammers.<br />
>><br />
>>>   are you saying that the thieves who sell it are<br />
>><br />
>> Efficient managers don&#8217;t buy from thieves, do they?<br />
><br />
>  then you admit that the private sector can be in many cases,<br />
> inefficient, and crooked:)))))</p>
<p>And they go out of business like <strong>GM</strong>, until government regulates them<br />
back into business as inefficient as they were and worse since they<br />
waste more government <strong>money</strong>.</p>
<p>Left to their own inefficient behavior, <strong>GM</strong> and the union there would<br />
have put themselves out of business.</p>
<p></d></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/27/left-to-their-own-inefficient-behavior-gm-and-the-union-there-would-have-put-themselves-out-of-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;The oil will get here regardless of the rout and shipping method, Obama wastes millions of gallons of diesel fuel, and didn&#8217;t care one little bit.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/24/the-oil-will-get-here-regardless-of-the-rout-and-shipping-method-obama-wastes-millions-of-gallons-of-diesel-fuel-and-didnt-care-one-little-bit-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/24/the-oil-will-get-here-regardless-of-the-rout-and-shipping-method-obama-wastes-millions-of-gallons-of-diesel-fuel-and-didnt-care-one-little-bit-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[23]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska Washington State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HYPOCRITE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INFLATE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William Sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TIRES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/23/2012 1:56 PM, CB @&#038;*$?%PrayForMe.com wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:10:18 -0800 (PST), plainolamerican > wrote: > >> On Jan 23, 9:03 am, &#8220;C&#8230;@PrayForMe.com&#8221; wrote: >>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:30:00 -0700, Hisler wrote: >>>> On 1/20/2012 6:10 PM, 2849 Dead wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:13:16 -0700, Hisler [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>23</strong>/2012 1:56 PM, <a href="mailto:CB<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>PrayForMe.com">CB<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>PrayForMe.com</a> wrote:<br />
> On Mon, <strong>23</strong> Jan 2012 07:<strong>10</strong>:18 -0800 (<strong>PST</strong>), plainolamerican<br />
>
<plainolamerican @gmail.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> On Jan <strong>23</strong>, 9:03 am, &#8220;C&#8230;@PrayForMe.com&#8221; <c ...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:<br />
>>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:30:00 -0700, Hisler <his ...@<acronym title="cocks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%s</span></acronym>.net> wrote:<br />
>>>> On 1/20/2012 6:<strong>10</strong> PM, 2849 Dead wrote:<br />
>>>>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:13:16 -0700, Hisler wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> On 1/20/2012 2:53 PM, plainolamerican wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> On Jan 20, 3:20 pm, &#8220;Ramon F. CabanaBoy&#8221;
<pissingoffthel ...@yahoo.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>> Attn RATs: You&#8217;re Fukked!<br />
>>>>>>>> Unions Representing Blue-Collar <strong>Working</strong> Americans Rip Obozo A New<br />
>>>>>>>> <acronym title="Asshole"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> A&*$?%e</span></acronym> Over The <strong>Keystone Pipeline</strong><br />
>>>>>>>> The president of the half-million member Laborers&#8217; International <strong>Union</strong><br />
>>>>>>>> of North America has categorized the Obama Administration&#8217;s January 18<br />
>>>>>>>> rejection of the construction of the 1,700-mile Keystone XL pipeline<br />
>>>>>>>> as &#8220;politics at its worst,&#8221; indicating a potential hit to the Obama<br />
>>>>>>>> re- election campaign from his union base. Here are the<br />
>>>>>>>> details…http://news.yahoo.com/union-pipeline-decision-politics-<br />
>>>>> worst-00430271&#8230;<br />
>>>>>>>> &#8212;&#8211;<br />
>>>>>>>> Whoops!<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>> O&#8217;s worst mistake yet<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> Since when did oil companies need the approval of the President to build<br />
>>>>>> pipelines?<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> They don&#8217;t.  They need the approval of the State Department, and<br />
>>>>> Department of the Interior.  When they cross state or international<br />
>>>>> borders.<br />
>>><br />
>>>> Then the pipeline will go to <strong>British Columbia</strong> and the oil will ship to<br />
>>>> <strong>China</strong>.  I&#8217;m not sure where it would have been shipped to from the Gulf<br />
>>>> of Mexico.  It doesn&#8217;t sound like the oil would benefit American consumers.</p>
<p>If oil was forced to be piped to the ocean it can pollute<br />
Alaska/Washington State like the spill at <strong>Prince William Sound</strong>.   When<br />
loaded into a tanker ship. Remember they sink and spill.</p>
<p>The stupidity of the <strong>ECO</strong>-Socialists is incredible.</p>
<p>If they wanted to stop a spill the first thing is to get control of the<br />
project NOT chase them away to do it without critical expertise and<br />
oversight.</p>
<p>Then you make sure the project is environmentally safe and it would also<br />
have been a National security win/win.</p>
<p>The only problems so far are, Obama isn&#8217;t getting a cut of the money for<br />
his re-election and his pals in the unions and ACORN and others.  And<br />
Obama&#8217;s big problem is that it cuts out the planned redistribution of<br />
<strong>wealth</strong> that has been planned for moving <strong>wealth</strong> from America to the rest<br />
of the world.</p>
<p>Interesting also is that the oil can then be shipped from <strong>BC</strong> the same as<br />
oil is shipped from Valdez Alaska to American ports and the question<br />
becomes, what will that do to the PRICE of oil and all that transporting<br />
will also increase the odds of an oil spill&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>So the oil will get to America regardless and we will still have the oil<br />
spill problem, the oil will get here regardless of the rout and shipping<br />
method, the *<strong>ECO</strong>-<strong>SOCIALISTS</strong>* are just plain stupid.</p>
<p>The wasted Diesel will be in the millions if NOT a billion gallons, so<br />
Obama with the stroke of a pen will choose to be wasteful and cause<br />
incredible inefficiency and waste while the <strong>EPA</strong> sits on the side line<br />
and allows Obama to kill gas mileage and allow the real industrial gas<br />
Mileage to be crushed while he tells you to <strong>INFLATE</strong> YOUR <strong>TIRES</strong> to get<br />
more gas mileage in your car.    Why is it so important to save fuel if<br />
Obama doesn&#8217;t follow his own imperative.   Where are the regulation that<br />
force Obama to be more efficient and waste less fuel like he has put on us?</p>
<p>Obama passes <strong>EPA</strong> <strong>regulations</strong> that force you to buy cars that get better<br />
gas mileage and at the same time Obama is going to force the oil<br />
producers to use more fuel to get their oil to the refineries and that<br />
means that you expend more energy getting your fuel to the users. And<br />
all it took was the stroke of a pen.</p>
<p>*What a <acronym title="FUCKING"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> F&*$?%G</span></acronym> <strong>HYPOCRITE</strong> OBAMA IS*</p>
<p><strong>Liberalism</strong> is doing what <strong>Liberalism</strong> does best, its destroying its host.</p>
</pissingoffthel></his></c></plainolamerican>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/24/the-oil-will-get-here-regardless-of-the-rout-and-shipping-method-obama-wastes-millions-of-gallons-of-diesel-fuel-and-didnt-care-one-little-bit-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Humans don&#8217;t kill humans in the uterus, doctors and mothers do</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/24/humans-dont-kill-humans-in-the-uterus-doctors-and-mothers-do-4/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/24/humans-dont-kill-humans-in-the-uterus-doctors-and-mothers-do-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[23]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Peterson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/24/2012 1:14 PM, Ron Peterson wrote: > On Jan 24, 6:03 am, P&#038;*$?%s wrote: >> On 1/23/2012 10:14 PM, Ron Peterson wrote: > >>> Does that mean that you are going to assault women who have abortions? > >> Of course not. But they should be tried for murder. > > It looks like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/24/2012 1:14 PM, <strong>Ron Peterson</strong> wrote:<br />
> On Jan 24, 6:03 am, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym> <n ...@none.com> wrote:<br />
>> On 1/<strong>23</strong>/2012 <strong>10</strong>:14 PM, <strong>Ron Peterson</strong> wrote:<br />
><br />
>>> Does that mean that you are going to assault women who have abortions?<br />
><br />
>> Of course not.  But they should be tried for murder.<br />
><br />
> It looks like you want the government to do your dirty work for you.<br />
><br />
> &#8211;<br />
>    Ron</p>
<p>Protecting our Rights is NOT the dirty work it should be a noble thing.</p>
<p></n></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/24/humans-dont-kill-humans-in-the-uterus-doctors-and-mothers-do-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>That doesn&#8217;t mean you are not &#8220;endowed&#8221; with unalienable RIGHTS, it simply means that you are being denied them.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/24/that-doesnt-mean-you-are-not-endowed-with-unalienable-rights-it-simply-means-that-you-are-being-denied-them-3/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/24/that-doesnt-mean-you-are-not-endowed-with-unalienable-rights-it-simply-means-that-you-are-being-denied-them-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[23]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[King George]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LIBERTY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LIFE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Mon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Tue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PROPERTY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIGHT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UTC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/23/2012 9:52 PM, 2875 Dead wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:14:38 -0800, retrogrouch wrote: > >> On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 01:51:40 +0000 (UTC), 2875 Dead >> wrote: >> >>>> That doesn&#8217;t mean you are not &#8220;endowed&#8221; with unalienable RIGHTS, it >>>> simply means that you are being denied them. >>> >>> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>23</strong>/2012 9:52 PM, 2875 Dead wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Mon</strong>, <strong>23</strong> Jan 2012 18:14:38 -0800, retrogrouch wrote:<br />
><br />
>> <strong>On Tue</strong>, 24 Jan 2012 01:51:40 +0000 (<strong>UTC</strong>), 2875 Dead <dead @gone.com><br />
>> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>> That doesn&#8217;t mean you are not &#8220;endowed&#8221; with unalienable RIGHTS, it<br />
>>>> simply means that you are being denied them.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Uh huh.  Is that a bit like saying a woman is endowed with a <acronym title="penis"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> p&*$?%s</span></acronym>, but<br />
>>> has simply been denied having one?<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> And all of this relies on the rights fairy to bestow these rights on<br />
>> you, so you become endowed.<br />
>><br />
>> And as new rights emerge, like a free press, democracy, voting, health<br />
>> care . . . it is just because we hadn&#8217;t dug up our &#8220;endowment&#8221;<br />
>> completely. The fact their new just means we didn&#8217;t know we were endowed<br />
>> with them. And things like the right to own slaves, as those disappear<br />
>> it&#8217;s because we misunderstood the rights fairy.<br />
><br />
> The term &#8220;inalienable rights&#8221; doesn&#8217;t appear in the <strong>Constitution</strong>, just<br />
> the DoI, a rhetorical document that amounts to a laundry list of gripes<br />
> against <strong>King George</strong>.</p>
<p>["Section 1.</p>
<p>All persons born or naturalized in the <strong>United States</strong>, and subject to the<br />
jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the <strong>United States</strong> and of the State<br />
wherein they reside. No State <strong>shall</strong> make or enforce any law which <strong>shall</strong><br />
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the <strong>United States</strong>;<br />
*nor <strong>shall</strong> any State deprive any person of* life, liberty, or property,<br />
without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its<br />
jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."]</p>
<p>Since it was not a <strong>power</strong> delegated to the &#8220;<strong>United States</strong>(<strong>Federal</strong><br />
government)&#8221; by the constitution.<br />
It is a States <strong>power</strong> or it&#8217;s the <strong>RIGHT</strong> of the people, simply by NOT<br />
being a <strong>power</strong> given to the <strong>Federal</strong> Government.  Since they are powers<br />
banned from the States in <strong>amendment</strong> 14&#8230;.  they are RIGHTS of the<br />
people.</p>
<p>["Amendment X<br />
The powers not delegated to the <strong>United States</strong> by the <strong>Constitution</strong>, nor<br />
prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively,<br />
or to the people."]</p>
<p>That combination as outlined in <strong>amendment</strong> <strong>10</strong>, has created the<br />
constitutional confirmation of RIGHTS to <strong>LIFE</strong>, <strong>LIBERTY</strong> and <strong>PROPERTY</strong>.</p>
<p>> By the time they got around to dealing with rights, they realized that<br />
> they were going to need more than rhetoric.  So they dealt with rights<br />
> government must observe and respect, and rights that all should have<br />
> under the law.  And then were smart enough to say that the list wasn&#8217;t<br />
> the only rights around, and people could add others as they saw fit.  By<br />
> and large it&#8217;s worked out reasonably well, but as you say, there is no<br />
> Rights Fairy, and human cultures have shown that there&#8217;s nothing<br />
> intrinsic about them</p>
<p>What the founders did was recognize those RIGHTS they saw as<br />
unalienable.  NOT that they were the only ones, just &#8220;among those are&#8221;<br />
life liberty and pursuit of happiness.</p>
<p>DoI<br />
["We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created<br />
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable<br />
Rights, *that among these are* Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."]</p>
<p></dead></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/24/that-doesnt-mean-you-are-not-endowed-with-unalienable-rights-it-simply-means-that-you-are-being-denied-them-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making it legal but frustratingly impossible, then you can&#8217;t complain about a loss of freedom, but the hoops are not worth the gains.  Like they are doing with Firearms.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/24/making-it-legal-but-frustratingly-impossible-then-you-cant-complain-about-a-loss-of-freedom-but-the-hoops-are-not-worth-the-gains-like-they-are-doing-with-firearms/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/24/making-it-legal-but-frustratingly-impossible-then-you-cant-complain-about-a-loss-of-freedom-but-the-hoops-are-not-worth-the-gains-like-they-are-doing-with-firearms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcohol Kingdoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BOOK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FACE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Tue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Internet Bubble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tell Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoorghis Jurgis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/24/2012 12:32 PM, Yoorghis @&#038;*$?%Jurgis.net wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:55:06 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: > >> On 1/24/2012 10:29 AM, Yoorghis @&#038;*$?%Jurgis.net wrote: >>> On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:01:13 -0600, &#8220;Bob&#8221; wrote: >>> >>>> &#8220;jim&#8221; < "sjedgingN0Sp"@m @&#038;*$?%mwt.net> wrote in message >>>> news:QridnRfeuaXbZIDSnZ2dnUVZ_qSdnZ2d @&#038;*$?%bright.net&#8230; >>>> >>>>> Prosperity is what the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/24/2012 12:32 PM, <a href="mailto:Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net">Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Tue</strong>, 24 Jan 2012 <strong>11</strong>:55:06 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> On 1/24/2012 <strong>10</strong>:29 AM, <a href="mailto:Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net">Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
>>> <strong>On Tue</strong>, 24 Jan 2012 08:01:13 -0600, &#8220;Bob&#8221; <dalnetbob @att.net> wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>> &#8220;jim&#8221; < "sjedgingN0Sp"@m<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>mwt.net> wrote in message<br />
>>>> news:QridnRfeuaXbZIDSnZ2dnUVZ_qSdnZ2d<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>bright.net&#8230;<br />
>>>><br />
>>>>> Prosperity is what the politicians who want a balanced budget<br />
>>>>> are promising.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> In what time frame?<br />
>>>><br />
>>><br />
>>> However long it takes to transfer a few TRillion to the pockets of<br />
>>> those who already own 70% of all <strong>wealth</strong><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> The best and fastest way to transfer the <strong>wealth</strong> from the have&#8217;s to the<br />
>> have NOT&#8217;s, is to get rid of the <strong>regulations</strong> that prevent competition.<br />
><br />
> Since 1980&#8212;there is NO evidence that any of that worked.</p>
<p>If you want to get something like Alcohol or Drugs to economically<br />
explode and make new millionaires, just <strong>BAN</strong> IT&#8230;.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why Cigarettes were taxed and regulated, banning them would make<br />
them more valuable, and create more interest.  Taxing and <strong>regulating</strong><br />
them is actually creating less of a market.  As it always does.</p>
<p>Taxes and Regulation are NOT sexy and they make for little interest in<br />
an endeavor. That is what Liberal-<strong>Progressives</strong> have finally learned from<br />
their mistaken attempts to ban things.   They have learned that killing<br />
something is best done by NOT killing it but <strong>regulating</strong> it until it is<br />
so close to dead that you can call it success. Making it legal but<br />
frustratingly impossible, then you can&#8217;t complain about a loss of<br />
<strong>freedom</strong>, but the hoops are not worth the gains.  Like they are doing<br />
with Firearms.</p>
<p>Liberal-<strong>Socialists</strong> are NOW <strong>regulating</strong> and taxing all freedoms, one after<br />
another, because they don&#8217;t want them to grow in popularity they want to<br />
strip you of yours enough to end up with a virtual ban and banning your<br />
<strong>freedom</strong> would create that natural human backlash.</p>
<p><strong>Tell Bill</strong> gates and <strong>Steve Jobs</strong>&#8230;.  The Tech/Internet Bubble was<br />
mostly unregulated and often called the wild west where millionaires<br />
popped up overnight &#8220;think Google&#8221; &#8220;<strong>FACE</strong> <strong>BOOK</strong>&#8220;.</p>
<p>Drugs are NOT taxed and are instead banned so drug dealers just ignore<br />
all <strong>taxes</strong> and <strong>regulations</strong>.</p>
<p>Alcohol was/is strictly taxed and is regulated , which group has the<br />
most <strong>change</strong> in the economic strata?</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t John DeLorean deal drugs?  Also didn&#8217;t poor people deal drugs<br />
and isn&#8217;t there a higher turn over of millionaires in drug lords than in<br />
<strong>Alcohol Kingdoms</strong>.</p>
<p>All be it when Alcohol <strong>regulations</strong> were cut in the late 1970&#8242;s, some new<br />
micro breweries in America blossomed and that again proves my point.</p>
<p>So when you ban or deregulate you get more of it, but when you regulate<br />
and tax something you get less of it</p>
<p>> So making silly, unsupportable claims like that is just nonsense.</p>
<p>Take your own advice.</p>
<p></dalnetbob></thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/24/making-it-legal-but-frustratingly-impossible-then-you-cant-complain-about-a-loss-of-freedom-but-the-hoops-are-not-worth-the-gains-like-they-are-doing-with-firearms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Humans don&#8217;t kill humans in the uterus, doctors and mothers do</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/24/humans-dont-kill-humans-in-the-uterus-doctors-and-mothers-do-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/24/humans-dont-kill-humans-in-the-uterus-doctors-and-mothers-do-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[23]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIGHT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Peterson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[> On 1/23/2012 10:14 PM, Ron Peterson wrote: >> On Jan 23, 9:16 pm, BeamMeUpScotty >> wrote: >> >>>> You don&#8217;t have standing to speak for the rights of a fetus. Only the >>>> parents have that right otherwise the government would make that >>>> decision. >> >>> My point is just that&#8230;. NO one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> On 1/<strong>23</strong>/2012 <strong>10</strong>:14 PM, <strong>Ron Peterson</strong> wrote:<br />
>> On Jan <strong>23</strong>, 9:16 pm, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com>  wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>> You don&#8217;t have standing to speak for the rights of a fetus. Only the<br />
>>>> parents have that right otherwise the government would make that<br />
>>>> decision.<br />
>><br />
>>> My point is just that&#8230;.   NO one is making decisions on behalf of the<br />
>>> tiny human life in the uterus.<br />
>><br />
>> The parents of the fetus are making those decisions, not the<br />
>> government or you.<br />
>><br />
>>> All considerations are for the rest of you.  The people that need the<br />
>>> most protection are the people that can protect themselves the least.<br />
>><br />
>> Does that mean that you are going to assault women who have abortions?</p>
<p>Do you assault the Bankers that you think are rich and therefore it is<br />
them that made you poor?</p>
<p>But then again I&#8217;m NOT you so no I don&#8217;t see any need for physical<br />
confrontation. All they are doing is killing their child in their uterus.</p>
<p>Do I attack incompetent and ignorant medical workers that kill up to<br />
300,000 customers each year?   NO but I do suggest that those medical<br />
workers get education or seek a life more suitable to their lack of<br />
competence, they could sell ice cream rather than working in health<br />
care.   A woman that seeks an <strong>abortion</strong> is there due to incompetence on<br />
her part.</p>
<p>I have NO visceral hate for women that get an <strong>abortion</strong>, more like I feel<br />
they need some help to think more competently, they need to understand<br />
their position in the universe.  I can stop NO mother from killing their<br />
child(like Susan Smith drowned hers)&#8230;.  they kill older children for<br />
many of the same reasons as they get abortions and I feel the same about<br />
them.  Killing any human is NOT a result of clear thinking.</p>
<p>You seem to pick <strong>abortion</strong> as a separate kind of killing, I see <strong>abortion</strong><br />
as no different than killing any child for any reason.   I see it like<br />
that because the <strong>Constitution</strong> says we have unalienable RIGHTS from our<br />
creator and &#8220;all&#8221; men or mankind has the <strong>RIGHT</strong> to life, liberty and the<br />
pursuit of happiness/property.</p>
</thendestroyeveryth>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/24/humans-dont-kill-humans-in-the-uterus-doctors-and-mothers-do-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Humans don&#8217;t kill humans in the uterus, doctors and mothers do</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/24/humans-dont-kill-humans-in-the-uterus-doctors-and-mothers-do/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/24/humans-dont-kill-humans-in-the-uterus-doctors-and-mothers-do/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 05:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[23]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIGHTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Peterson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/23/2012 10:14 PM, Ron Peterson wrote: > On Jan 23, 8:07 am, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: > >> I&#8217;m pro individual RIGHTS. Which is also pro constitution. That makes >> me for babies RIGHTS, even if the baby is in a uterus and is small or >> big, black or white, girl or boy, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>23</strong>/2012 <strong>10</strong>:14 PM, <strong>Ron Peterson</strong> wrote:<br />
> On Jan <strong>23</strong>, 8:07 am, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> I&#8217;m pro individual <strong>RIGHTS</strong>.  Which is also pro constitution.  That makes<br />
>> me for babies <strong>RIGHTS</strong>, even if the baby is in a uterus and is small or<br />
>> big, black or white, girl or boy, and made of individual unique human <strong>DNA</strong>.<br />
><br />
> You don&#8217;t have standing to speak for the rights of a fetus. Only the<br />
> parents have that right otherwise the government would make that<br />
> decision.</p>
<p>My point is just that&#8230;.   NO one is making decisions on behalf of the<br />
tiny human life in the uterus.</p>
<p>All considerations are for the rest of you.  The people that need the<br />
most protection are the people that can protect themselves the least.</p>
<p>I also save kids when they are drowning&#8230;..   Saving them from murder<br />
is NOT that different, so I do have some small amount of kinship to<br />
other human life.  While I&#8217;m not &#8220;responsible&#8221; I am sympathetic to the<br />
plight of others, as were many people sympathetic enough to fight in a<br />
Civil <strong>War</strong> that they thought was at least partly against slavery.</p>
<p>You can kill your pet if want and while I don&#8217;t like it or approve, I<br />
don&#8217;t plan on working to pass any laws to stop it, because they are NOT<br />
human.<br />
Killing puppies and clubbing baby seals, is NOT as bad as killing a<br />
human life.   When killing human babies in the uterus is over, then I&#8217;ll<br />
think about the dog puppies and seal pups.</p>
<p>*Humans don&#8217;t kill humans in the uterus, doctors and mothers do*</p>
</thendestroyeveryth>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/24/humans-dont-kill-humans-in-the-uterus-doctors-and-mothers-do/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;The oil will get here regardless of the rout and shipping method, Obama wastes millions of gallons of diesel fuel, and didn&#8217;t care one little bit.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/23/the-oil-will-get-here-regardless-of-the-rout-and-shipping-method-obama-wastes-millions-of-gallons-of-diesel-fuel-and-didnt-care-one-little-bit/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/23/the-oil-will-get-here-regardless-of-the-rout-and-shipping-method-obama-wastes-millions-of-gallons-of-diesel-fuel-and-didnt-care-one-little-bit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[23]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska Washington State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HYPOCRITE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INFLATE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OBAMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Mon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PRICE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William Sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TIRES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/23/2012 1:56 PM, CB @&#038;*$?%PrayForMe.com wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:10:18 -0800 (PST), plainolamerican > wrote: > >> On Jan 23, 9:03 am, &#8220;C&#8230;@PrayForMe.com&#8221; wrote: >>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:30:00 -0700, Hisler wrote: >>>> On 1/20/2012 6:10 PM, 2849 Dead wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:13:16 -0700, Hisler [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>23</strong>/2012 1:56 PM, <a href="mailto:CB<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>PrayForMe.com">CB<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>PrayForMe.com</a> wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Mon</strong>, <strong>23</strong> Jan 2012 07:<strong>10</strong>:18 -0800 (PST), plainolamerican<br />
>
<plainolamerican @gmail.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> On Jan <strong>23</strong>, 9:03 am, &#8220;C&#8230;@PrayForMe.com&#8221; <c ...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:<br />
>>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:30:00 -0700, Hisler <his ...@<acronym title="cocks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%s</span></acronym>.net> wrote:<br />
>>>> On 1/20/2012 6:<strong>10</strong> PM, 2849 Dead wrote:<br />
>>>>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:13:16 -0700, Hisler wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> On 1/20/2012 2:53 PM, plainolamerican wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> On Jan 20, 3:20 pm, &#8220;Ramon F. CabanaBoy&#8221;
<pissingoffthel ...@yahoo.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>> Attn RATs: You&#8217;re Fukked!<br />
>>>>>>>> Unions Representing Blue-Collar Working Americans Rip Obozo A New<br />
>>>>>>>> <acronym title="Asshole"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> A&*$?%e</span></acronym> Over The <strong>Keystone Pipeline</strong><br />
>>>>>>>> The president of the half-million member Laborers&#8217; International Union<br />
>>>>>>>> of North America has categorized the Obama Administration&#8217;s January 18<br />
>>>>>>>> rejection of the construction of the 1,700-mile Keystone XL pipeline<br />
>>>>>>>> as &#8220;politics at its worst,&#8221; indicating a potential hit to the Obama<br />
>>>>>>>> re- election campaign from his union base. Here are the<br />
>>>>>>>> details…http://news.yahoo.com/union-pipeline-decision-politics-<br />
>>>>> worst-00430271&#8230;<br />
>>>>>>>> &#8212;&#8211;<br />
>>>>>>>> Whoops!<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>> O&#8217;s worst mistake yet<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> Since when did oil companies need the approval of the President to build<br />
>>>>>> pipelines?<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> They don&#8217;t.  They need the approval of the State Department, and<br />
>>>>> Department of the Interior.  When they cross state or international<br />
>>>>> borders.<br />
>>><br />
>>>> Then the pipeline will go to <strong>British Columbia</strong> and the oil will ship to<br />
>>>> <strong>China</strong>.  I&#8217;m not sure where it would have been shipped to from the Gulf<br />
>>>> of <strong>Mexico</strong>.  It doesn&#8217;t sound like the oil would benefit American consumers.</p>
<p>If oil was forced to be piped to the ocean it can pollute<br />
Alaska/Washington State like the spill at <strong>Prince William Sound</strong>.   When<br />
loaded into a tanker ship. Remember they sink and spill.</p>
<p>The stupidity of the <strong>ECO</strong>-Socialists is incredible.</p>
<p>If they wanted to stop a spill the first thing is to get control of the<br />
project NOT chase them away to do it without critical expertise and<br />
oversight.</p>
<p>Then you make sure the project is environmentally safe and it would also<br />
have been a National security win/win.</p>
<p>The only problems so far are, Obama isn&#8217;t getting a cut of the money for<br />
his re-election and his pals in the unions and <strong>ACORN</strong> and others.  And<br />
Obama&#8217;s big problem is that it cuts out the planned redistribution of<br />
<strong>wealth</strong> that has been planned for moving <strong>wealth</strong> from America to the rest<br />
of the world.</p>
<p>Interesting also is that the oil can then be shipped from <strong>BC</strong> the same as<br />
oil is shipped from Valdez Alaska to American ports and the question<br />
becomes, what will that do to the <strong>PRICE</strong> of oil and all that transporting<br />
will also increase the odds of an oil spill&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>So the oil will get to America regardless and we will still have the oil<br />
spill problem, the oil will get here regardless of the rout and shipping<br />
method, the *<strong>ECO</strong>-<strong>SOCIALISTS</strong>* are just plain stupid.</p>
<p>The wasted Diesel will be in the millions if NOT a billion gallons, so<br />
Obama with the stroke of a pen will chose to be wasteful and cause<br />
incredible inefficiency and waste while the <strong>EPA</strong> sits on the side line<br />
and allows Obama to create gas mileage *real gas Mileage* to be crushed<br />
while he tells you to <strong>INFLATE</strong> YOUR <strong>TIRES</strong> to get more gas mileage in your<br />
car.</p>
<p>Obama passes regulations that force you to buy cars that get better gas<br />
mileage and at the same time Obama is going to force the oil producers<br />
to use more fuel to get their oil to the refineries. And all it took was<br />
the stroke of a pen.</p>
<p>*What a <acronym title="FUCKING"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> F&*$?%G</span></acronym> <strong>HYPOCRITE</strong> <strong>OBAMA</strong> IS*</p>
</pissingoffthel></his></c></plainolamerican>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/23/the-oil-will-get-here-regardless-of-the-rout-and-shipping-method-obama-wastes-millions-of-gallons-of-diesel-fuel-and-didnt-care-one-little-bit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keystone Pipeline!&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;the oil will get here regardless of the rout and shipping method, the *ECO-SOCIALISTS* are just plain stupid.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/23/keystone-pipelinethe-oil-will-get-here-regardless-of-the-rout-and-shipping-method-the-eco-socialists-are-just-plain-stupid/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/23/keystone-pipelinethe-oil-will-get-here-regardless-of-the-rout-and-shipping-method-the-eco-socialists-are-just-plain-stupid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[23]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska Washington State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Mon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PRICE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William Sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/23/2012 1:56 PM, CB @&#038;*$?%PrayForMe.com wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:10:18 -0800 (PST), plainolamerican > wrote: > >> On Jan 23, 9:03 am, &#8220;C&#8230;@PrayForMe.com&#8221; wrote: >>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:30:00 -0700, Hisler wrote: >>>> On 1/20/2012 6:10 PM, 2849 Dead wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:13:16 -0700, Hisler [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>23</strong>/2012 1:56 PM, <a href="mailto:CB<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>PrayForMe.com">CB<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>PrayForMe.com</a> wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Mon</strong>, <strong>23</strong> Jan 2012 07:<strong>10</strong>:18 -0800 (<strong>PST</strong>), plainolamerican<br />
>
<plainolamerican @gmail.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> On Jan <strong>23</strong>, 9:03 am, &#8220;C&#8230;@PrayForMe.com&#8221; <c ...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:<br />
>>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:30:00 -0700, Hisler <his ...@<acronym title="cocks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%s</span></acronym>.net> wrote:<br />
>>>> On 1/20/2012 6:<strong>10</strong> PM, 2849 Dead wrote:<br />
>>>>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:13:16 -0700, Hisler wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> On 1/20/2012 2:53 PM, plainolamerican wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> On Jan 20, 3:20 pm, &#8220;Ramon F. CabanaBoy&#8221;
<pissingoffthel ...@yahoo.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>> Attn RATs: You&#8217;re Fukked!<br />
>>>>>>>> Unions Representing Blue-Collar <strong>Working</strong> Americans Rip Obozo A New<br />
>>>>>>>> <acronym title="Asshole"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> A&*$?%e</span></acronym> Over The <strong>Keystone Pipeline</strong><br />
>>>>>>>> The president of the half-million member Laborers&#8217; International <strong>Union</strong><br />
>>>>>>>> of <strong>North America</strong> has categorized the Obama Administration&#8217;s January 18<br />
>>>>>>>> rejection of the construction of the 1,700-mile Keystone XL pipeline<br />
>>>>>>>> as &#8220;politics at its worst,&#8221; indicating a potential hit to the Obama<br />
>>>>>>>> re- election campaign from his union base. Here are the<br />
>>>>>>>> details…http://news.yahoo.com/union-pipeline-decision-politics-<br />
>>>>> worst-00430271&#8230;<br />
>>>>>>>> &#8212;&#8211;<br />
>>>>>>>> Whoops!<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>> O&#8217;s worst mistake yet<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> Since when did oil companies need the approval of the President to build<br />
>>>>>> pipelines?<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> They don&#8217;t.  They need the approval of the <strong>State Department</strong>, and<br />
>>>>> Department of the Interior.  When they cross state or international<br />
>>>>> borders.<br />
>>><br />
>>>> Then the pipeline will go to <strong>British Columbia</strong> and the oil will ship to<br />
>>>> <strong>China</strong>.  I&#8217;m not sure where it would have been shipped to from the Gulf<br />
>>>> of <strong>Mexico</strong>.  It doesn&#8217;t sound like the oil would benefit American consumers.</p>
<p>If it was to go to the ocean it can pollute Alaska/Washington State like<br />
the spill at <strong>Prince William Sound</strong>.   When loaded into a tanker ship.<br />
Remember they sink and spill.</p>
<p>The stupidity of the <strong>ECO</strong>-Socialists is incredible.</p>
<p>If they wanted to stop a spill the first thing is to get control of the<br />
project NOT chase them away to do it without critical expertise and<br />
oversight.</p>
<p>Then you make sure the project is environmentally safe and it would also<br />
have been a National security win/win.</p>
<p>The only problems so far are, Obama isn&#8217;t getting a cut of the money for<br />
his re-election and his pals in the unions and ACORN and others.  And<br />
Obama&#8217;s big problem is that it cuts out the planned redistribution of<br />
<strong>wealth</strong> that has been planned for moving <strong>wealth</strong> from America to the rest<br />
of the world.</p>
<p>Interesting also is that the oil can then be shipped from <strong>BC</strong> the same as<br />
oil is shipped from Valdez Alaska to American ports and the question<br />
becomes, what will that do to the <strong>PRICE</strong> of oil and all that transporting<br />
will also increase the odds of an oil spill&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>So the oil will get to America regardless and we will still have the oil<br />
spill problem, the oil will get here regardless of the rout and shipping<br />
method, the *<strong>ECO</strong>-<strong>SOCIALISTS</strong>* are just plain stupid.</p>
</pissingoffthel></his></c></plainolamerican>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/23/keystone-pipelinethe-oil-will-get-here-regardless-of-the-rout-and-shipping-method-the-eco-socialists-are-just-plain-stupid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You&#8217;re Fukked! Unions Representing Blue-Collar Working Americans Rip Obozo A New Asshole Over The Keystone Pipeline!</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/23/youre-fukked-unions-representing-blue-collar-working-americans-rip-obozo-a-new-asshole-over-the-keystone-pipeline/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/23/youre-fukked-unions-representing-blue-collar-working-americans-rip-obozo-a-new-asshole-over-the-keystone-pipeline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[23]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska Washington State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Mon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William Sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/23/2012 1:56 PM, CB @&#038;*$?%PrayForMe.com wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:10:18 -0800 (PST), plainolamerican > wrote: > >> On Jan 23, 9:03 am, &#8220;C&#8230;@PrayForMe.com&#8221; wrote: >>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:30:00 -0700, Hisler wrote: >>>> On 1/20/2012 6:10 PM, 2849 Dead wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:13:16 -0700, Hisler [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>23</strong>/2012 1:56 PM, <a href="mailto:CB<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>PrayForMe.com">CB<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>PrayForMe.com</a> wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Mon</strong>, <strong>23</strong> Jan 2012 07:<strong>10</strong>:18 -0800 (<strong>PST</strong>), plainolamerican<br />
>
<plainolamerican @gmail.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> On Jan <strong>23</strong>, 9:03 am, &#8220;C&#8230;@PrayForMe.com&#8221; <c ...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:<br />
>>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:30:00 -0700, Hisler <his ...@<acronym title="cocks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%s</span></acronym>.net> wrote:<br />
>>>> On 1/20/2012 6:<strong>10</strong> PM, 2849 Dead wrote:<br />
>>>>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:13:16 -0700, Hisler wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> On 1/20/2012 2:53 PM, plainolamerican wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> On Jan 20, 3:20 pm, &#8220;Ramon F. CabanaBoy&#8221;
<pissingoffthel ...@yahoo.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>> Attn RATs: You&#8217;re Fukked!<br />
>>>>>>>> Unions Representing Blue-Collar <strong>Working</strong> Americans Rip Obozo A New<br />
>>>>>>>> <acronym title="Asshole"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> A&*$?%e</span></acronym> Over The <strong>Keystone Pipeline</strong><br />
>>>>>>>> The president of the half-million member Laborers&#8217; International <strong>Union</strong><br />
>>>>>>>> of North America has categorized the <strong>Obama Administration</strong>&#8216;s January 18<br />
>>>>>>>> rejection of the construction of the 1,700-mile Keystone XL pipeline<br />
>>>>>>>> as &#8220;politics at its worst,&#8221; indicating a potential hit to the Obama<br />
>>>>>>>> re- election campaign from his union base. Here are the<br />
>>>>>>>> details…http://news.yahoo.com/union-pipeline-decision-politics-<br />
>>>>> worst-00430271&#8230;<br />
>>>>>>>> &#8212;&#8211;<br />
>>>>>>>> Whoops!<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>>> O&#8217;s worst mistake yet<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> Since when did oil companies need the approval of the President to build<br />
>>>>>> pipelines?<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> They don&#8217;t.  They need the approval of the <strong>State Department</strong>, and<br />
>>>>> Department of the Interior.  When they cross state or international<br />
>>>>> borders.<br />
>>><br />
>>>> Then the pipeline will go to <strong>British Columbia</strong> and the oil will ship to<br />
>>>> <strong>China</strong>.  I&#8217;m not sure where it would have been shipped to from the Gulf<br />
>>>> of <strong>Mexico</strong>.  It doesn&#8217;t sound like the oil would benefit American consumers.</p>
<p>If it was to go to the ocean it can pollute Alaska/Washington State like<br />
the spill at <strong>Prince William Sound</strong>.   When loaded into a tanker ship.<br />
Remember they sink and spill.</p>
<p>The stupidity of the <strong>ECO</strong>-<strong>Socialists</strong> is incredible.</p>
<p>If they wanted to stop a spill the first thing is to get control of the<br />
project NOT chase them away to do it without critical expertise and<br />
oversight.</p>
<p>Then you make sure the project is environmentally safe and it would also<br />
have been a National security win/win.</p>
<p>The only problems so far are, Obama isn&#8217;t getting a cut of the <strong>money</strong> for<br />
his re-election and his pals in the unions and <strong>ACORN</strong> and others.  And<br />
Obama&#8217;s big problem is that it cuts out the planned redistribution of<br />
<strong>wealth</strong> that has been planned for moving <strong>wealth</strong> from America to the rest<br />
of the world.</p>
</pissingoffthel></his></c></plainolamerican>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/23/youre-fukked-unions-representing-blue-collar-working-americans-rip-obozo-a-new-asshole-over-the-keystone-pipeline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>the constitution clearly spells out the right to legislate, the right to regulate, the right to tax.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/22/the-constitution-clearly-spells-out-the-right-to-legislate-the-right-to-regulate-the-right-to-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/22/the-constitution-clearly-spells-out-the-right-to-legislate-the-right-to-regulate-the-right-to-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LONG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Sat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redistribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/22/2012 3:47 PM, Nickname unavailable wrote: > On Jan 22, 11:40 am, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: >> On 1/21/2012 8:33 PM, Yoorg&#8230;@Jurgis.net wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 19:56:31 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty >>> wrote: >> >>>> On 1/20/2012 9:11 PM, Yoorg&#8230;@Jurgis.net wrote: >> >>>>>>>> There is NO such thing as a TAX to redistribute [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/22/2012 3:47 PM, Nickname unavailable wrote:<br />
> On Jan 22, <strong>11</strong>:40 am, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>> On 1/21/2012 8:33 PM, <a href="mailto:Yoorg...@Jurgis.net">Yoorg&#8230;@Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>> <strong>On Sat</strong>, 21 Jan 2012 19:56:31 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>>> </thendestroyeveryth>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>> On 1/20/2012 9:<strong>11</strong> PM, <a href="mailto:Yoorg...@Jurgis.net">Yoorg&#8230;@Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>> There is NO such thing as a <strong>TAX</strong> to redistribute <strong>money</strong> from one person to<br />
>>>>>>>> another person.<br />
>><br />
>>> there IS taxation to &#8220;redistribute&#8221; via government policy,<br />
>>> programs and national agenda that does exactly that.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> NO that is stealing, government didn&#8217;t need the <strong>money</strong> to run.<br />
>><br />
>>>  How do you &#8220;run&#8221; an interstate Highway, provide water,<br />
>>> communications, (list endless programs) if government doesn&#8217;t &#8220;need<br />
>>> <strong>money</strong>&#8220;?<br />
>><br />
>>>> What part of the constitution gives the <strong>Federal</strong> Government the power to<br />
>>>> do those things?<br />
>><br />
>>> Any number of accepted rulings and <strong>LONG</strong> established doctrines we have<br />
>>> operated under for generations.<br />
>><br />
>>>> Do the <strong>Feds</strong> provide water? Do tell&#8230;<br />
>><br />
>>> They provide the assistance to communities, cities, towns in the form<br />
>>> of funding.<br />
>><br />
>>> Funding coming from Taxes.<br />
>><br />
>> Unconstitutional&#8230;.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>>> <strong>Federal</strong> Highways?   Maybe mail routs.<br />
>><br />
>>> Interstate commerce and a means of a modern infrastructure (airlines,<br />
>>> Highways, Rail lines, etc) to move goods and services all come from a<br />
>>> <strong>Redistribution</strong> of taxes.<br />
>><br />
>> It&#8217;s NOT commerce, it is a road.<br />
>><br />
>>>> Who put the <strong>Federal</strong> government in charge of free speech or radio waves<br />
>>>> and what they carry?<br />
>><br />
>>> The people own the airwaves and all associated with it<br />
>><br />
>> But it&#8217;s NOT in the constitution as a power.<br />
>><br />
>> While you have a point, it has no constitutional power backing it, you<br />
>> are trying to ignore the constitution and grant powers that don&#8217;t exist.<br />
>><br />
>> The courts can&#8217;t delegate new powers to the government.<br />
><br />
>  the constitution clearly spells out the right to legislate, the right<br />
> to regulate, the right to tax.</p>
<p>No but it allows limited powers for some legislation and taxation&#8230;.<br />
an <strong>amendment</strong> was needed to create an income tax and an <strong>amendment</strong> was<br />
needed for prohibition.  Any things the <strong>Federal</strong> government is NOT given<br />
power to do is a <strong>POWER</strong> that is passed on to the States or the people<br />
unless the constitution says otherwise.</p>
<p>Amendment <strong>10</strong> say so.</p>
</thendestroyeveryth>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/22/the-constitution-clearly-spells-out-the-right-to-legislate-the-right-to-regulate-the-right-to-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>*If BIGGER GOVERNMENT WERE THE ANSWER* &#8230;.Obama would have already fixed everything</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/22/if-bigger-government-were-the-answer-obama-would-have-already-fixed-everything-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/22/if-bigger-government-were-the-answer-obama-would-have-already-fixed-everything-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 23:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ANSWER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BIGGER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOVERNMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PST]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/22/2012 5:04 PM, retrogrouch @&#038;*$?%comcast.net wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 10:33:08 -0800 (PST), wy wrote: > >>> So we became more efficient with the Private sector building computer >>> infrastructure than with the government hiring people to write software >>> code for massive government projects. >> >> Give an example. > > [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/22/2012 5:04 PM, <a href="mailto:retrogrouch<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>comcast.net">retrogrouch<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>comcast.net</a> wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Sun</strong>, 22 Jan 2012 <strong>10</strong>:33:08 -0800 (<strong>PST</strong>), wy <wy_ @myself.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>>> So we became more efficient with the Private sector building computer<br />
>>> infrastructure than with the government hiring people to write software<br />
>>> code for massive government projects.<br />
>><br />
>> Give an example.<br />
><br />
><br />
> I&#8217;m guessing he doesn&#8217;t know where the Internet came from.</p>
<p>The private sector, the government was creating a communications link<br />
and other people used it for <strong>NON</strong> government ideas&#8230;.   As a government<br />
nuclear survival program it was not a huge success.   But with the<br />
private sector taking it over it blossomed.</p>
<p>Now if you want to talk about private sector &#8220;success&#8221; we can discuss<br />
that government didn&#8217;t invent the airplane or the transistor.</p>
<p>The private sector had no need to build nuclear weapons or go to the<br />
moon.  Or sell a nuclear survivable internet, but they did have one <acronym title="shit"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> s&*$?%t</span></acronym><br />
load of porn to sell.</p>
<p>The internet owes its &#8220;success&#8221; to porn, not the government.</p>
<p>What has the government been successful at?</p>
<p>A few spin-off creations from $trillions spent in space and Nuclear and<br />
high-tech&#8230;.   if they were a R&#038;D company living off the patents, they<br />
would be broke. and trillions in the hole.</p>
<p>We the private sector have paid for what was gained from government a<br />
hundred times over.</p>
<p></wy_></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/22/if-bigger-government-were-the-answer-obama-would-have-already-fixed-everything-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>*They are Jim Crow laws*&gt;&gt;&gt;just as skin color is DNA so is longevity DNA, and that means Liberalism/Socialism is based on Bigoted discrimination of fellow humans.&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;*They are Jim Crow laws*</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/22/they-are-jim-crow-lawsjust-as-skin-color-is-dna-so-is-longevity-dna-and-that-means-liberalismsocialism-is-based-on-bigoted-discrimination-of-fellow-humans-they-are-jim-crow-laws-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/22/they-are-jim-crow-lawsjust-as-skin-color-is-dna-so-is-longevity-dna-and-that-means-liberalismsocialism-is-based-on-bigoted-discrimination-of-fellow-humans-they-are-jim-crow-laws-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AWG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Crachet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EQUAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMPORTANT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Crow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KNEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LOTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LYING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POLITICAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REDISTRIBUTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/22/2012 2:58 PM, SilentOtto wrote: > On Jan 22, 12:15 pm, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: >> On 1/22/2012 1:29 AM, SilentOtto wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Jan 21, 3:44 pm, Neolibertarian wrote: >>>> In article >>>> &#60;95918c1d-d230-4580-a647-96c9f165d&#8230;@v14g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, >> >>>> SilentOtto wrote: >>>>> On Jan 21, 1:38 pm, Bob [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/22/2012 2:58 PM, SilentOtto wrote:<br />
> On Jan 22, 12:15 pm, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>> On 1/22/2012 1:29 AM, SilentOtto wrote:<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>> On Jan 21, 3:44 pm, Neolibertarian <cognac ...@gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>>>> In article<br />
>>>> &lt;95918c1d-d230-4580-a647-96c9f165d&#8230;@v14g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,<br />
>><br />
>>>>  SilentOtto <silento ...@hotmail.com> wrote:<br />
>>>>> On Jan 21, 1:38 pm, <strong>Bob Crachet</strong> < @newspi.rit> wrote:<br />
>>>>>> On 1/21/2012 1:<strong>10</strong> PM, Möebius Pretzel wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> Yesterday news was that Scientist had determined that the hole in the<br />
>>>>>> ozone layer, over the Antarctic was caused by cold weather.<br />
>>>>>> The loonies have agendas and won&#8217;t be confused by logic and fact.<br />
>>>>>> Anyone every had Freon, the old fashioned refrigerant leak out saw that<br />
>>>>>> it sank to the ground. Most of it was broken up the environment, Very<br />
>>>>>> little made it to the Antarctic.<br />
>><br />
>>>>> The tobacco companies managed to confuse the matter of the health<br />
>>>>> risks connected to smoking for nearly thirty years.<br />
>><br />
>>>>> But, in the end, they lost and lost big time.<br />
>><br />
>>>> Irrelevant analogy. One has nothing to do with the other.<br />
>><br />
>>> Of course it does, rightard.<br />
>><br />
>>> Those with a vested interest in denying <strong>AWG</strong> have engaged the exact<br />
>>> same deliberately dishonest tactics that tobacco companies used to<br />
>>> deny the overwhelming scientific consensus that smoking was connected<br />
>>> to serious health risks.<br />
>><br />
>>> They lie, obfuscate data, engage in cherry picking, draw false<br />
>>> conclusions, pay so-called &#8220;experts&#8221; to misrepresent the nature and<br />
>>> state of the science, demonize their opposition, assign false motives<br />
>>> and do everything else the tobacco companies did to create confusion<br />
>>> about the issue in the public mind.<br />
>><br />
>>>> Admittedly, this species of fallacy is typical of the &#8220;global warming<br />
>>>> debate.&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>>> Perhaps your accusations of &#8220;fallacy&#8221; would be more persuasive had I<br />
>>> not already seen this game played out before.<br />
>><br />
>>>>> Soon, the actual environmental effects of <strong>AGW</strong> will start manifesting<br />
>>>>> in earnest, and the global warming deniers will lose just as big as<br />
>>>>> the tobacco companies did.<br />
>><br />
>>>> The models don&#8217;t work.<br />
>><br />
>>>> They haven&#8217;t suddenly begun to work, and they may never begin doing so.<br />
>><br />
>>>> Your problem is, even if the predictions fail miserably, year after<br />
>>>> year, even for fifteen or more years, never can any of these failures<br />
>>>> invalidate the predictions and the foundational theory.<br />
>><br />
>>>> &#8220;Just wait until next year&#8230;&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>>> The only real problem with the models is that they consistently<br />
>>> underestimate the feedback effect, which is, justifiably, extremely<br />
>>> difficult to quantify.<br />
>><br />
>>> Ultimately,  the Achilles heel of denialism is that the main<br />
>>> predictions of the science surrounding <strong>AWG</strong> are coming to pass.<br />
>><br />
>>> You&#8217;ll notice that while energy companies are continuing to publicly<br />
>>> deny the reality of <strong>AWG</strong>, that&#8217;s not stopping them from pressuring<br />
>>> various governments to assert offshore mineral rights in the Arctic.<br />
>><br />
>>> The proof of their duplicity is in the pudding, rightard.<br />
>><br />
>> They NOW believe the formaldehyde in the cigarette is connected to the<br />
>> cancer&#8230;.<br />
><br />
> No, rightard.<br />
><br />
> They NOW believe that <strong>LOTS</strong> of things in cigarette smoke are connected<br />
> to cancer, not just formaldehyde.<br />
><br />
>> And since formaldehyde is everywhere, can you tell us whether it&#8217;s the<br />
>> formaldehyde in the cigarette that somehow creates cancer or the other<br />
>> formaldehyde in life you contacted that is causing the cancer.<br />
><br />
> Name other sources where formaldehyde is delivered into the body in<br />
> similar concentrations to that delivered by cigarette smoke.<br />
><br />
> When it comes to carcinogens, amount -does- appear to matter,<br />
> rightard.<br />
><br />
>> Then can you tell us why some people get cancer while others don&#8217;t and<br />
>> is that because of formaldehyde or <strong>DNA</strong>.<br />
><br />
> For the terms of this discussion, it&#8217;s irrelevant.<br />
><br />
> Specifically speaking, the science says that smoking will -increase<br />
> one&#8217;s risk- of contracting cancer, not that all smokers will get<br />
> cancer.<br />
><br />
> Further, that&#8217;s the -exact- same thing that privately funded tobacco<br />
> company research showed, and is one of the reasons that they choose to<br />
> suppress that research, while at the same time they publicly claimed<br />
> that the link between smoking and cancer was unconfirmed and suggested<br />
> that those who had conducted studies showing otherwise were engaged in<br />
> flawed research, were attempting <strong>social</strong> engineering aimed at taking<br />
> away one&#8217;s freedom, were disgruntled former employees, were chasing<br />
> research grants or had some other ulterior motive that had nothing to<br />
> do with discovering the actual risks associated with smoking.<br />
><br />
> Man&#8230;  That sounds familiar, doesn&#8217;t it rightard?<br />
><br />
>> Then tell us why banning cigarettes would stop cancer.<br />
><br />
> Straw man.  Nobody from the scientific community has -ever- made that<br />
> claim, rightard.<br />
><br />
>> Wouldn&#8217;t you need<br />
>> to know what causes it and stop that? For instance the formaldehyde<br />
>> might be in your carpet&#8230;  Should you ban carpet?<br />
><br />
> You&#8217;re suggesting that companies should be allowed to sell carpet that<br />
> their own internal research shows releases hazardous levels of<br />
> carcinogens while concealing that fact from the general public and<br />
> denying independent studies that reach a conclusion that they already<br />
> know to be true from their own internal research?<br />
><br />
> How typically rightarded of you.<br />
><br />
>> What about low or NO formaldehyde cigarettes?<br />
><br />
> What about them, rightard?<br />
><br />
> This isn&#8217;t about selling a hazardous product as much as it&#8217;s about<br />
> selling a hazardous product while <strong>LYING</strong> about the associated risks<br />
> that they <strong>KNEW</strong> existed, yet denied.<br />
><br />
> Hey&#8230;  I&#8217;ve an idea.<br />
><br />
> How about I sell you some aspirin capsules that contain the advertised<br />
> amount of aspirin, (I wouldn&#8217;t want to be accused of false<br />
> advertising) but use rat poison as a filler?<br />
></p>
<p>I can buy my own rat poison and it&#8217;s taxed less than cigarettes you<br />
<acronym title="fucking"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> f&*$?%g</span></acronym> idiot.</p>
<p>> That shouldn&#8217;t be a problem for you, right?</p>
<p>NO because I expect it from the likes of you and that&#8217;s why government<br />
should stay away from my products, the government employs scum like you.</p>
<p>> After all, the internal research I&#8217;ve conducted and released publicly<br />
> shows that there is no conclusive link between ingesting the rat<br />
> poison in my capsules and dying.</p>
<p>Good&#8230;.   sell some and by tomorrow you would be hanging from a tree in<br />
front of your home.    people would find out and they would get justice.</p>
<p>> Now, while it&#8217;s true that independent studies strongly and<br />
> overwhelming disagree with the conclusions of my publicly released<br />
> studies, and show a conclusive link between taking rat poison and<br />
> dying&#8230;</p>
<p>Tylenol was under the gun by the public and they didn&#8217;t even put the<br />
poison in the pills.  The guy in <strong>China</strong> that used the wrong product and<br />
poisoned the Chinese dog food that was sold in America, conveniently<br />
committed &#8220;suicide&#8221;&#8230;..</p>
<p>> And, the internal research I&#8217;ve conducted and kept hidden from public<br />
> scrutiny show that rat poison is indeed deadly&#8230;</p>
<p>Only to rats or in large doses to humans, and because I understand that<br />
water in too large a dose is deadly also&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;tell us will you ever drink any water again since it&#8217;s deadly in<br />
large doses.   NO <acronym title="shit"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> s&*$?%t</span></acronym> dim bulb, people die from ingesting too much water.</p>
<p>> As I&#8217;m publicly denying any link between eating the rat poison in my<br />
> aspirin capsules and dying, there shouldn&#8217;t be any problem with<br />
> putting rat poison in aspirin capsules and selling it to you.</p>
<p>NONE at all, I plan to eat your aspirin when I am already dying so that<br />
my family and estate can sue you for my death 3 days early.  I hope you<br />
plan to have plenty of really good lawyers.</p>
<p>> Right, rightard?</p>
<p><acronym title="Asshole"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> A&*$?%e</span></acronym>.</p>
<p>> That should be OK with you if you think what the tobacco companies did<br />
> was acceptable.</p>
<p>We called them coffin nails and have done so from the 1920 and probably<br />
long before that.  If you thought it was good for you to smoke, then you<br />
deserve a Darwin award and we need not pine our loss to humanity.</p>
<p>Do we ban/tax rat poison because it can kill you, do we bam water<br />
because it can kill you?</p>
<p>> As to the rest your rightard rant&#8230;<br />
><br />
> It maxed out my rightardedness meter, so I&#8217;ll have to devote my<br />
> remaining usenet time to cleaning my meter rather than responding to<br />
> the remainder your post.<br />
><br />
> Heh heh&#8230;<br />
><br />
> Lying racist rightard socialists&#8230;<br />
><br />
> Batshit crazy and dogshit stupid, every single last one of you.</p>
<p>So &#8220;you&#8221; are saying there is a limit to the lies that you Liberals can<br />
tell at one time?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s new information about Liberals that I had no idea existed&#8230;.</p>
<p>I always thought the lies were limitless coming from Liberals.</p>
<p>>> You Liberals already have discriminatory laws and government affirmative<br />
>> actions that choose winners and losers by their <strong>DNA</strong>, for instance you<br />
>> have Social Security.<br />
>><br />
>> Like cigarettes you seem to think that discriminating and bigotry<br />
>> against people on a basis of their <strong>DNA</strong> is acceptable. Just look at<br />
>> Social Security where you penalize people whose <strong>DNA</strong> is for a short life,<br />
>> with paying a Social Security tax, and then you give that <strong>money</strong> to those<br />
>> with a <strong>DNA</strong> that are predisposed for a longer life.<br />
>><br />
>> Clear discrimination just as skin color is in <strong>DNA</strong> so is longevity in<br />
>> your <strong>DNA</strong>, and that means <strong>Liberalism</strong>/Socialism  is based on Bigoted<br />
>> discrimination of fellow humans.     *They are <strong>Jim Crow</strong> laws* all over<br />
>> again, Social Security and Smoking laws and education laws and funding<br />
>> and MORE&#8230;.<br />
>><br />
>> If you can take <strong>money</strong> from people as a tax to *<strong>REDISTRIBUTE</strong>* you can<br />
>> also take a chicken or bag of grain as in days of old or a kidney, and<br />
>> that means that you can steal from people with <strong>DNA</strong> that gave them a<br />
>> healthy kidney and give to those that their <strong>DNA</strong> gave weak kidneys.  And<br />
>> remember that &#8220;you&#8221; Liberals think that government can tax solely for<br />
>> the purpose of redistribution as in ObamaCare. And you have no concerns<br />
>> about discrimination by government, and you ignore the constitution.<br />
>> That makes it easy for government to justify their affirmative action<br />
>> programs.  Suppose they have a health care Affirmative action plan that<br />
>> includes transplants of kidneys?<br />
>><br />
>> To make life *<strong>FAIR</strong>* and *<strong>EQUAL</strong>* in its outcome, redistribution of all<br />
>> things is needed(Social Justice) so when you are taken off the street<br />
>> and taxed for your good health and become an affirmative action<br />
>> ObamaCare patient donor, remember the kidney you are paying <strong>taxes</strong> with<br />
>> was never really your own in a Socialist society.  And keep in mind it<br />
>> will keep someone more important than you alive.  Because when it comes<br />
>> to Socialism, the needs of the many out weighs the needs of the one, so<br />
>> your kidney will be much more wisely used by someone that contributes<br />
>> more than you to the many socialists needs.  In other words the <strong>BIG</strong><br />
>> <strong>IMPORTANT</strong> <strong>POLITICAL</strong> MEMBERS are far more important than the dime a dozen<br />
>> workers.<br />
>><br />
>> You will become an organ supply system to keep the important people<br />
>> alive&#8230;.   Maybe you are already?</p>
<p>I chuckled that you couldn&#8217;t even attempt this part where you know again<br />
you are guilty as charged and you have no Liberal talking points,<br />
because I have only posted it here a few times and there have been no<br />
Liberal think tanks that have ever sent out Liberal talking points on it.</p>
<p>But it was fun to see you react to the two points.  You spew the party<br />
dogma for one and are stumped when there is NO Democrat party talking point.</p>
<p>I expected no less.</p>
<p></silento></cognac></thendestroyeveryth>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/22/they-are-jim-crow-lawsjust-as-skin-color-is-dna-so-is-longevity-dna-and-that-means-liberalismsocialism-is-based-on-bigoted-discrimination-of-fellow-humans-they-are-jim-crow-laws-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ha ha denier losers. For you the war is over</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/22/ha-ha-denier-losers-for-you-the-war-is-over/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/22/ha-ha-denier-losers-for-you-the-war-is-over/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 17:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Crachet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/21/2012 9:50 PM, Neolibertarian wrote: > In article &#60;4f1b6c58$0$1701$742ec2ed @&#038;*$?%news.sonic.net>, > rfischer @&#038;*$?%sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: > >> Neolibertarian wrote: >>> In article &#60;4f1b4584$0$1718$742ec2ed @&#038;*$?%news.sonic.net>, >>> rfischer @&#038;*$?%sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: >>> >>>> Neolibertarian wrote: >>>>> SilentOtto wrote: >>>>>> On Jan 21, 1:38 pm, Bob Crachet < @newspi.rit> wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/21/2012 1:10 PM, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/21/2012 9:50 PM, Neolibertarian wrote:<br />
> In article &lt;4f1b6c58$0$1701$742ec2ed<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>news.sonic.net>,<br />
>  <a href="mailto:rfischer<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>sonic.net">rfischer<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>sonic.net</a> (Ray Fischer) wrote:<br />
><br />
>> Neolibertarian  <cognac756 @gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>>> In article &lt;4f1b4584$0$1718$742ec2ed<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>news.sonic.net>,<br />
>>> <a href="mailto:rfischer<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>sonic.net">rfischer<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>sonic.net</a> (Ray Fischer) wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>> Neolibertarian  </cognac756><cognac756 @gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>>>>> SilentOtto <silentotto @hotmail.com> wrote:<br />
>>>>>> On Jan 21, 1:38 pm, <strong>Bob Crachet</strong> < @newspi.rit> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> On 1/21/2012 1:<strong>10</strong> PM, Möebius Pretzel wrote:<br />
>>>><br />
>>>>>>> Yesterday news was that Scientist had determined that the hole in the<br />
>>>>>>> ozone layer, over the Antarctic was caused by cold weather.<br />
>>>>>>> The loonies have agendas and won&#8217;t be confused by logic and fact.<br />
>>>>>>> Anyone every had Freon, the old fashioned refrigerant leak out saw<br />
>>>>>>> that<br />
>>>>>>> it sank to the ground. Most of it was broken up the <strong>environment</strong>, Very<br />
>>>>>>> little made it to the Antarctic.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> The tobacco companies managed to confuse the matter of the health<br />
>>>>>> risks connected to smoking for nearly thirty years.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> But, in the end, they lost and lost big time.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> Irrelevant analogy.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Of course it&#8217;s relevant.<br />
>>><br />
>>> <a href="http://www.youtube.com" >http://www.youtube.com</a><br />
>><br />
>> It&#8217;s a common rightard stupidity to believe everything that posted on<br />
>> YouTube.  It&#8217;s why they&#8217;re so easy to fool.<br />
><br />
> Irony can be pretty ironic sometimes&#8230;<br />
></p>
<p>What is truly funny is, this is coming from a Liberal who never heard a<br />
Liberal line of <acronym title="shit"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> s&*$?%t</span></acronym> he didn&#8217;t swallow.</p>
<p></silentotto></cognac756></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/22/ha-ha-denier-losers-for-you-the-war-is-over/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>*They are Jim Crow laws*&gt;&gt;&gt;just as skin color is DNA so is longevity DNA, and that means Liberalism/Socialism  is based on Bigoted discrimination of fellow humans.&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;*They are Jim Crow laws*</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/22/they-are-jim-crow-lawsjust-as-skin-color-is-dna-so-is-longevity-dna-and-that-means-liberalismsocialism-is-based-on-bigoted-discrimination-of-fellow-humans-they-are-jim-crow-laws/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/22/they-are-jim-crow-lawsjust-as-skin-color-is-dna-so-is-longevity-dna-and-that-means-liberalismsocialism-is-based-on-bigoted-discrimination-of-fellow-humans-they-are-jim-crow-laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 17:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AWG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Crachet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EQUAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMPORTANT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Crow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MEMBERS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POLITICAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REDISTRIBUTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/22/2012 1:29 AM, SilentOtto wrote: > On Jan 21, 3:44 pm, Neolibertarian wrote: >> In article >> &#60;95918c1d-d230-4580-a647-96c9f165d&#8230;@v14g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, >> >> SilentOtto wrote: >>> On Jan 21, 1:38 pm, Bob Crachet < @newspi.rit> wrote: >>>> On 1/21/2012 1:10 PM, Möebius Pretzel wrote: >> >>>> Yesterday news was that Scientist had determined that the hole in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/22/2012 1:29 AM, SilentOtto wrote:<br />
> On Jan 21, 3:44 pm, Neolibertarian <cognac ...@gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>> In article<br />
>> &lt;95918c1d-d230-4580-a647-96c9f165d&#8230;@v14g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,<br />
>><br />
>>  SilentOtto <silento ...@hotmail.com> wrote:<br />
>>> On Jan 21, 1:38 pm, <strong>Bob Crachet</strong> < @newspi.rit> wrote:<br />
>>>> On 1/21/2012 1:<strong>10</strong> PM, Möebius Pretzel wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>> Yesterday news was that Scientist had determined that the hole in the<br />
>>>> ozone layer, over the Antarctic was caused by cold weather.<br />
>>>> The loonies have agendas and won&#8217;t be confused by logic and fact.<br />
>>>> Anyone every had Freon, the old fashioned refrigerant leak out saw that<br />
>>>> it sank to the ground. Most of it was broken up the <strong>environment</strong>, Very<br />
>>>> little made it to the Antarctic.<br />
>><br />
>>> The tobacco companies managed to confuse the matter of the health<br />
>>> risks connected to smoking for nearly thirty years.<br />
>><br />
>>> But, in the end, they lost and lost big time.<br />
>><br />
>> Irrelevant analogy. One has nothing to do with the other.<br />
><br />
> Of course it does, rightard.<br />
><br />
> Those with a vested interest in denying <strong>AWG</strong> have engaged the exact<br />
> same deliberately dishonest tactics that tobacco companies used to<br />
> deny the overwhelming scientific consensus that smoking was connected<br />
> to serious health risks.<br />
><br />
> They lie, obfuscate data, engage in cherry picking, draw false<br />
> conclusions, pay so-called &#8220;experts&#8221; to misrepresent the nature and<br />
> state of the science, demonize their opposition, assign false motives<br />
> and do everything else the tobacco companies did to create confusion<br />
> about the issue in the public mind.<br />
><br />
><br />
>> Admittedly, this species of fallacy is typical of the &#8220;global warming<br />
>> debate.&#8221;<br />
><br />
> Perhaps your accusations of &#8220;fallacy&#8221; would be more persuasive had I<br />
> not already seen this game played out before.<br />
><br />
><br />
>>> Soon, the actual environmental effects of AGW will start manifesting<br />
>>> in earnest, and the global warming deniers will lose just as big as<br />
>>> the tobacco companies did.<br />
>><br />
>> The models don&#8217;t work.<br />
>><br />
>> They haven&#8217;t suddenly begun to work, and they may never begin doing so.<br />
>><br />
>> Your problem is, even if the predictions fail miserably, year after<br />
>> year, even for fifteen or more years, never can any of these failures<br />
>> invalidate the predictions and the foundational theory.<br />
>><br />
>> &#8220;Just wait until next year&#8230;&#8221;<br />
><br />
> The only real problem with the models is that they consistently<br />
> underestimate the feedback effect, which is, justifiably, extremely<br />
> difficult to quantify.<br />
><br />
> Ultimately,  the Achilles heel of denialism is that the main<br />
> predictions of the science surrounding <strong>AWG</strong> are coming to pass.<br />
><br />
> You&#8217;ll notice that while energy companies are continuing to publicly<br />
> deny the reality of <strong>AWG</strong>, that&#8217;s not stopping them from pressuring<br />
> various governments to assert offshore mineral rights in the Arctic.<br />
><br />
> The proof of their duplicity is in the pudding, rightard.</p>
<p>They NOW believe the formaldehyde in the cigarette is connected to the<br />
cancer&#8230;.</p>
<p>And since formaldehyde is everywhere, can you tell us whether it&#8217;s the<br />
formaldehyde in the cigarette that somehow creates cancer or the other<br />
formaldehyde in life you contacted that is causing the cancer.</p>
<p>Then can you tell us why some people get cancer while others don&#8217;t and<br />
is that because of formaldehyde or <strong>DNA</strong>.</p>
<p>Then tell us why banning cigarettes would stop cancer. Wouldn&#8217;t you need<br />
to know what causes it and stop that? For instance the formaldehyde<br />
might be in your carpet&#8230;  Should you ban carpet?</p>
<p>What about low or NO formaldehyde cigarettes?</p>
<p>You Liberals already have discriminatory laws and government affirmative<br />
actions that choose winners and losers by their <strong>DNA</strong>, for instance you<br />
have <strong>Social Security</strong>.</p>
<p>Like cigarettes you seem to think that discriminating and bigotry<br />
against people on a basis of their <strong>DNA</strong> is acceptable. Just look at<br />
<strong>Social Security</strong> where you penalize people whose <strong>DNA</strong> is for a short life,<br />
with paying a <strong>Social Security</strong> tax, and then you give that <strong>money</strong> to those<br />
with a <strong>DNA</strong> that are predisposed for a longer life.</p>
<p>Clear discrimination just as skin color is in <strong>DNA</strong> so is longevity in<br />
your <strong>DNA</strong>, and that means <strong>Liberalism</strong>/<strong>Socialism</strong>  is based on Bigoted<br />
discrimination of fellow humans.     *They are <strong>Jim Crow</strong> laws* all over<br />
again, <strong>Social Security</strong> and Smoking laws and education laws and funding<br />
and MORE&#8230;.</p>
<p>If you can take <strong>money</strong> from people as a tax to *<strong>REDISTRIBUTE</strong>* you can<br />
also take a chicken or bag of grain as in days of old or a kidney, and<br />
that means that you can steal from people with <strong>DNA</strong> that gave them a<br />
healthy kidney and give to those that their <strong>DNA</strong> gave weak kidneys.  And<br />
remember that &#8220;you&#8221; Liberals think that government can tax solely for<br />
the purpose of redistribution as in ObamaCare. And you have no concerns<br />
about discrimination by government, and you ignore the constitution.<br />
That makes it easy for government to justify their affirmative action<br />
programs.  Suppose they have a health care Affirmative action plan that<br />
includes transplants of kidneys?</p>
<p>To make life *<strong>FAIR</strong>* and *<strong>EQUAL</strong>* in its outcome, redistribution of all<br />
things is needed(<strong>Social Justice</strong>) so when you are taken off the street<br />
and taxed for your good health and become an affirmative action<br />
ObamaCare patient donor, remember the kidney you are paying <strong>taxes</strong> with<br />
was never really your own in a Socialist society.  And keep in mind it<br />
will keep someone more important than you alive.  Because when it comes<br />
to <strong>Socialism</strong>, the needs of the many out weighs the needs of the one, so<br />
your kidney will be much more wisely used by someone that contributes<br />
more than you to the many socialists needs.  In other words the <strong>BIG</strong><br />
<strong>IMPORTANT</strong> <strong>POLITICAL</strong> <strong>MEMBERS</strong> are far more important than the dime a dozen<br />
workers.</p>
<p>You will become an organ supply <strong>system</strong> to keep the important people<br />
alive&#8230;.   Maybe you are already?</p>
<p></silento></cognac></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/22/they-are-jim-crow-lawsjust-as-skin-color-is-dna-so-is-longevity-dna-and-that-means-liberalismsocialism-is-based-on-bigoted-discrimination-of-fellow-humans-they-are-jim-crow-laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>*If BIGGER GOVERNMENT WERE THE ANSWER*  &#8230;.Obama would have already fixed everything</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/22/if-bigger-government-were-the-answer-obama-would-have-already-fixed-everything/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/22/if-bigger-government-were-the-answer-obama-would-have-already-fixed-everything/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 16:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ANSWER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CORPORATIONS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOVERNMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[increased]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KRUGMAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOTHING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAUL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the poor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TRUE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/20/2012 10:24 PM, Sid9 wrote: > > &#8220;First. Post&#8221; wrote in message > news:2r3kh798em7la9fnlb8jcokfmq42trst7k @&#038;*$?%4ax.com&#8230; >> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:42:26 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty >> wrote: >> >>> On 1/20/2012 3:39 PM, Bret Cahill wrote: >>>>>>>> January 19, 2012 >>>>> >>>>>>>> Taxes at the Top >>>>> >>>>>>>> By PAUL KRUGMAN >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/20/2012 <strong>10</strong>:24 PM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
><br />
> &#8220;First. Post&#8221; <occupiersdumberthandirt @invalid.net> wrote in message<br />
> news:2r3kh798em7la9fnlb8jcokfmq42trst7k<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>4ax.com&#8230;<br />
>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:42:26 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>> On 1/20/2012 3:39 PM, Bret Cahill wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>> January 19, 2012<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> Taxes at the Top<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> By <strong>PAUL</strong> <strong>KRUGMAN</strong><br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> <snip><br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> The main reason the rich pay so little is that most of their<br />
>>>>>>>> income takes<br />
>>>>>>>> the form of capital gains, which are taxed at a maximum rate of<br />
>>>>>>>> 15 percent,<br />
>>>>>>>> far below the maximum on wages and salaries. So the question is<br />
>>>>>>>> whether<br />
>>>>>>>> capital gains &#8211; three-quarters of which go to the top 1 percent<br />
>>>>>>>> of the<br />
>>>>>>>> income distribution &#8211; warrant such special treatment.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> -<br />
>>>>>>> Why do capital gains warrant such special treatment?<br />
>>>>>>> 1.  The funds are invested for a long term, rather than for<br />
>>>>>>> example, being<br />
>>>>>>> used to flip real estate.<br />
>>>>>>> 2.  The funds are invested in a manner that the <strong>GOVERNMENT</strong> wants.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> No mention was made of the taxes paid by the &#8220;rich&#8221; when spending<br />
>>>>>>> their<br />
>>>>>>> profits.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>>> A sales tax is the same for the rich as for <strong>the poor</strong> for necessities,<br />
>>>>>> and that&#8217;s not a rate but on a per head basis.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>>> Land value taxation is much more progressive than a sales tax.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>>> Bret Cahill<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> If you have $3million, why is that bad?<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Sometimes it isn&#8217;t<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> That&#8217;s why we need to hike taxes on the rich.  So everyone will be<br />
>>>> closer to being worth 3 million.<br />
>>>><br />
>>><br />
>>> Like farting in a hurricane&#8230;.   Obama could have spent that deficit he<br />
>>> created $5 trillion, by writing checks to the <strong>NON</strong> millionaires already.<br />
>>><br />
>>> But he chose to give it all to the <strong>BIG</strong> <strong>CORPORATIONS</strong>.<br />
>><br />
>> If you took the total of all of the stimulous bills that Obama is<br />
>> responsible for and divided the <strong>money</strong> up among those in the workforce<br />
>> (includes those working as well as those seeking employment) then a<br />
>> married couple would have received roughly $40,000.<br />
>> 150 million people each getting a $20,000 check would have stimulated<br />
>> the economy a hell of a lot more than giving hundreds of billions each<br />
>> to a select few banks and corporations and phoney &#8220;green&#8221; outfits like<br />
>> Solyndra.</p>
<p>But then why did the government have that <strong>money</strong> in the first plsce, that<br />
is the question.  If all they did was take it abd then give it back that<br />
is NOT the definition of taxing and &#8220;to pay the bills&#8221;.</p>
<p>>> The greatest stimulator of the economy is to put more <strong>money</strong> in the<br />
>> pockets of the consumers.</p>
<p>Those are called jobs&#8230;.  so the best thing is to encourage jobs.<br />
Instead the government encourages *<strong>REGULATIONS</strong> AND <strong>TAXES</strong>* .</p>
<p>>>  <strong>Progressives</strong> can piss about taxing the top,<br />
>> the middle, hell anyone they want.  But more taxation does not put a<br />
>> single penny into the pockets of the consumers.</p>
<p>Exactly.</p>
<p>>>  Higher taxes will not<br />
>> generate <strong>demand</strong> for goods and services.  Higher taxes will not promote<br />
>> consumer spending.</p>
<p><strong>TRUE</strong>.</p>
<p>>> You and I both know that higher taxes only promote more bureacracy and<br />
>> government spending on <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym> that does little if anything to boost the<br />
>> economy.</p>
<p>*If BIGGER <strong>GOVERNMENT</strong> WERE THE <strong>ANSWER</strong>*  &#8230;.Obama would have already<br />
fixed everything as he has <strong>increased</strong> the cost and size of government.<br />
But 3 years of Obama&#8217;s *<strong>BIG</strong> <strong>GOVERNMENT</strong>* and *<strong>NOTHING</strong> is fixed*.</p>
<p>> It depends on tax policy. Tax the wealthy they wont spend a nickel less.<br />
> Step up government spending infrastructure and education, for example.<br />
> You create jobs and permanent public capital assets.</p>
<p>You create useless government jobs, basically <strong>welfare</strong>&#8230;.  and that is a<br />
drag on the Private economy.</p>
<p>> Those assets may be bridges, water works, and such, plus educated people<br />
> who will earn more educated than they will uneducated&#8230;</p>
<p>All things the private sector can create when needed&#8230;.  blindly<br />
building for what your crystal ball says is the <strong>future</strong> is silly and<br />
wasteful.  Why didn&#8217;t the government create transistors and airplanes<br />
when we needed them&#8230;.</p>
<p>> Therefore, they will ultimately pay more in taxes from their <strong>increased</strong><br />
> earnings.</p>
<p>Thanks to Microsoft, more millionaires pay more taxes than ever before.<br />
So we became more efficient with the Private sector building computer<br />
infrastructure than with the government hiring people to write software<br />
code for massive government projects.</p>
<p></snip></thendestroyeverything></occupiersdumberthandirt></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/22/if-bigger-government-were-the-answer-obama-would-have-already-fixed-everything/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ex-Wife Says Gingrich Wanted &#8216;Open Marriage,&#8217; ABC Reports</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/20/ex-wife-says-gingrich-wanted-open-marriage-abc-reports-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/20/ex-wife-says-gingrich-wanted-open-marriage-abc-reports-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Thu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=28014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/20/2012 11:53 AM, 2849 Dead wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:28:48 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty wrote: > >> On 1/20/2012 12:26 AM, 2849 Dead wrote: >>> On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:47:20 -0800, Phlip wrote: >>> >>>> On Jan 19, 8:30 pm, &#8220;anon&#8221; wrote: >>>> >>>>> If Newt had instead probed the uterus of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/20/2012 <strong>11</strong>:53 AM, 2849 Dead wrote:<br />
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 <strong>10</strong>:28:48 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:<br />
><br />
>> On 1/20/2012 12:26 AM, 2849 Dead wrote:<br />
>>> <strong>On Thu</strong>, 19 Jan 2012 20:47:20 -0800, Phlip wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>> On Jan 19, 8:30 pm, &#8220;anon&#8221; <anon @anon> wrote:<br />
>>>><br />
>>>>> If Newt had instead probed the uterus of an intern with a cigar, all<br />
>>>>> would have been forgiven by the Liberals.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> We also don&#8217;t care <strong>Clinton</strong> dodged the draft. We&#8217;re just funny like<br />
>>>> that.<br />
>>><br />
>>> The cigar always gets these righties.  They blush and stammer and then<br />
>>> spend the night masturbating.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> The question isn&#8217;t what <strong>Clinton</strong> did with a cigar, but why he did it with<br />
>> a cigar<br />
><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> Knowing the correct tool for the job will gain you respect.<br />
><br />
> In your case, it&#8217;s a rubber glove and a jar of Vaseline, right?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think so but, a cigar will give you cancer and the second <strong>hand</strong><br />
<strong>KY</strong> will give others cancer.</p>
<p></anon></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/20/ex-wife-says-gingrich-wanted-open-marriage-abc-reports-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From a National Security view point, Obama is selling out America to OPEC isn&#8217;t he?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/20/from-a-national-security-view-point-obama-is-selling-out-america-to-opec-isnt-he/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/20/from-a-national-security-view-point-obama-is-selling-out-america-to-opec-isnt-he/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COMPANY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eddie Haskell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FORIEGN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OIL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Thu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoorghis Jurgis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[> On 1/19/2012 10:00 AM, Yoorghis @&#038;*$?%Jurgis.net wrote: >> On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 09:56:28 -0600, &#8220;Eddie Haskell&#8220; >> wrote: >> >> >>> Yeah, and I hear they are considering what color it should be as well. >>> That&#8217;ll take a three year study so cowards can kick the can on behalf of >>> extreme [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> On 1/19/2012 <strong>10</strong>:00 AM, <a href="mailto:Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net">Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
>> <strong>On Thu</strong>, 19 Jan 2012 09:56:28 -0600, &#8220;<strong>Eddie Haskell</strong>&#8220;<rrhv @wqpm.com><br />
>> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>> Yeah, and I hear they are considering what color it should be as well.<br />
>>> That&#8217;ll take a three year study so cowards can kick the can on behalf of<br />
>>> extreme leftist environmentalists that have a stranglehold on <strong>US</strong> energy<br />
>>> production while we continue to rely on hostile sources and piss<br />
>>> <strong>money</strong> down<br />
>>> a rat hold on alternatives that the market rejects because smart<br />
>>> people like<br />
>>> Hussein know better how to run an economy  than 300 million<br />
>>> <strong>collective</strong> minds<br />
>>> acting in a free market. The history of the <strong>United States</strong> proves that.<br />
>><br />
>> Why should WE allow our <strong>environment</strong> to be jepoardized, so a <strong>FORIEGN</strong><br />
>> <strong>OIL</strong> <strong>COMPANY</strong> can make obscene profits?<br />
>><br />
>> WE don&#8217;t get any cheaper gas or oil&#8212;Prices are set world wide, not<br />
>> on local supply or <strong>demand</strong>.</p>
<p>Yet we are told that <strong>OPEC</strong> is manipulating their own price by setting<br />
their volume.</p>
<p>So if we have a huge pipe with billions of barrels of oil flowing to us,<br />
<strong>OPEC</strong> will NOT be as able to effect the price by withholding oil will they.</p>
<p>From a <strong>National Security</strong> view point, Obama is selling out America to<br />
<strong>OPEC</strong> isn&#8217;t he?</p>
<p></rrhv></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/20/from-a-national-security-view-point-obama-is-selling-out-america-to-opec-isnt-he/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNN contributor salutes Marines for urinating on dead Afghans &lt; &lt; &lt; GO NWO!!!</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/18/cnn-contributor-salutes-marines-for-urinating-on-dead-afghans-go-nwo-5/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/18/cnn-contributor-salutes-marines-for-urinating-on-dead-afghans-go-nwo-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AUDIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NWO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/18/2012 1:21 PM, Ray Fischer wrote: > BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >> On 1/18/2012 2:08 AM, Ray Fischer wrote: >>> BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>>> On 1/16/2012 10:28 PM, Ray Fischer wrote: >>>>> BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>>>>> On 1/15/2012 11:51 AM, Möebius Pretzel wrote: >>>>>>> CNN contributor salutes Marines for urinating on dead Afghans (AUDIO) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/18/2012 1:21 PM, Ray Fischer wrote:<br />
> BeamMeUpScotty
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>> On 1/18/2012 2:08 AM, Ray Fischer wrote:<br />
>>> BeamMeUpScotty  </thendestroyeverything>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>>>> On 1/16/2012 <strong>10</strong>:28 PM, Ray Fischer wrote:<br />
>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty  </thendestroyeverything>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>>>>>> On 1/15/2012 <strong>11</strong>:51 AM, Möebius Pretzel wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> <strong>CNN</strong> contributor salutes Marines for urinating on dead Afghans (<strong>AUDIO</strong>)<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> <embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7s_UVtCiLy4&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /><br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> If there is any punishment it should be for *recording* the actions on<br />
>>>>>> video, NOT for pissing on the Taliban&#8230;.. dead or alive.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> What a good little murderous <acronym title="turd"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> t&*$?%d</span></acronym> you are.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> I have nothing to do with murder&#8230;.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Except for when you cheer murder.<br />
>>><br />
>>>>  I was talking of treating the dead<br />
>>>> and the murderers of 3000 <strong>NYC</strong> workers.<br />
>>><br />
>>> So you&#8217;re justifying murder with the lie that the dead people being<br />
>>> pissed on had something to do with 9/<strong>11</strong>.<br />
>>><br />
>>> That&#8217;s the sort of hate that killed millions of Jews.<br />
>>><br />
>>>> It&#8217;s far better than what you would do to a baby in the uterus.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Are you insane?<br />
>><br />
>> I&#8217;m NOT the one killing human life,<br />
><br />
> By your own insane rules you are a murderer.  A mass murderer.<br />
> You willingly, knowingly, and intentionally let children die<br />
> by the hundreds every day.  Children that you could save.<br />
><br />
> And instead of saving children you screech your hatred at<br />
> women for not making sacrifices that are much greater than<br />
> you&#8217;re willing to make.</p>
<p>Who do I murder&#8230;  tell me so I can stop.</p>
<p>So far in this life, by my count I am at least two lives saved and zero<br />
murdered.</p>
<p>I hate NO woman for her ignorance or her being preyed upon by slick<br />
Liberal-<strong>Socialists</strong> that convince them their life is more important than<br />
any other life on the planet including their own children&#8217;s lives&#8230;.</p>
<p>Believing that Children should be shopped for and picking and choosing<br />
the child you want is a natural tendency for vapid, shallow women that<br />
believe shopping is a career or a way of life.</p>
</thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/18/cnn-contributor-salutes-marines-for-urinating-on-dead-afghans-go-nwo-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNN contributor salutes Marines for urinating on dead Afghans &lt; &lt; &lt; GO NWO!!!</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/18/cnn-contributor-salutes-marines-for-urinating-on-dead-afghans-go-nwo-4/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/18/cnn-contributor-salutes-marines-for-urinating-on-dead-afghans-go-nwo-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AUDIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NWO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/18/2012 1:22 PM, Ray Fischer wrote: > Stan de SD wrote: >> On Jan 17, 9:38 am, BeamMeUpScotty >> wrote: >>> On 1/16/2012 10:28 PM, Ray Fischer wrote: >>> >>>> BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>>>> On 1/15/2012 11:51 AM, Möebius Pretzel wrote: >>>>>> CNN contributor salutes Marines for urinating on dead Afghans (AUDIO) >>> >>>>>> >>> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/18/2012 1:22 PM, Ray Fischer wrote:<br />
> Stan de <strong>SD</strong>  <standesd @gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>> On Jan 17, 9:38 am, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>>> On 1/16/2012 <strong>10</strong>:28 PM, Ray Fischer wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>> BeamMeUpScotty  </thendestroyeveryth>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>>>>> On 1/15/2012 <strong>11</strong>:51 AM, Möebius Pretzel wrote:<br />
>>>>>> <strong>CNN</strong> contributor salutes Marines for urinating on dead Afghans (<strong>AUDIO</strong>)<br />
>>><br />
>>>>>> <embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7s_UVtCiLy4&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /><br />
>>><br />
>>>>> If there is any punishment it should be for *recording* the actions on<br />
>>>>> video, NOT for pissing on the Taliban&#8230;.. dead or alive.<br />
>>><br />
>>>> What a good little murderous <acronym title="turd"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> t&*$?%d</span></acronym> you are.<br />
>>><br />
>>> I have nothing to do with murder&#8230;.  I was talking of treating the dead<br />
>>> and the murderers of 3000 <strong>NYC</strong> workers.<br />
>>><br />
>>> It&#8217;s far better than what you would do to a baby in the uterus. That is<br />
>>> murderous.<br />
>>><br />
>>> To humiliate and disrespect a murderer or a dead murderer is NOT evil,<br />
>>> it tells the youth what is acceptable to civilized society and murder is<br />
>>> a vile act that will gain you no respect from us.<br />
>><br />
>> That&#8217;s the part the liberals will never understand, given that they<br />
>> value innocent life no more that the lives of depraved murderers.<br />
><br />
> Fascist lie about liberals.  Always.<br />
><br />
> Notice who has no regard for life, who cheerfully kills millions in wars,<br />
> who turns a blind eye to people in need, who consider profits to be<br />
> more important than life.</p>
<p>Leftists kill human life in the uterus&#8230;..   We know who considers<br />
human life precious.</p>
</thendestroyeveryth></standesd></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/18/cnn-contributor-salutes-marines-for-urinating-on-dead-afghans-go-nwo-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>baby seals killed by glacier melt</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/18/baby-seals-killed-by-glacier-melt/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/18/baby-seals-killed-by-glacier-melt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crazy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kool Ade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Tue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Published January]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transition Zone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WARMING]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/18/2012 12:57 PM, Tunderbar wrote: > On Jan 15, 1:24 am, Wally W. wrote: >> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:48:10 -0800 (PST), Transition Zone wrote: >>> Baby Harp Seals Being Drowned, Crushed Amid Melting Ice >>> Global warming is melting sea ice the pups need for survival. . >>> by Dave Mosher for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/18/2012 12:57 PM, Tunderbar wrote:<br />
> On Jan 15, 1:24 am, Wally W. <ww8 ...@aim.com> wrote:<br />
>> <strong>On Tue</strong>, <strong>10</strong> Jan 2012 12:48:<strong>10</strong> -0800 (<strong>PST</strong>), <strong>Transition Zone</strong> wrote:<br />
>>> Baby Harp Seals Being Drowned, Crushed Amid Melting Ice<br />
>>> Global warming is melting sea ice the pups need for survival. .<br />
>>> by Dave Mosher          for National Geographic News<br />
>><br />
>>> <strong>Published January</strong> 6, 2012<br />
>><br />
>>> Harp seal pups are taking a hit due to global warming, according to<br />
>>> the first study of its kind.<br />
>><br />
>> Polar bears weren&#8217;t cute enough.<br />
>><br />
>> Cue the baby seals.<br />
><br />
> Next up &#8211; pandas&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>Good thing we don&#8217;t club those baby seals anymore.</p>
<p>But why is this global warming and NOT Natural seal deaths, animals like<br />
whales beach themselves for no reason linked to global warming&#8230;.</p>
<p>Why would the seals NOT be capable of doing stupid unexplainable things<br />
like picking a spot that is bad to give <strong>birth</strong>?</p>
<p>Our own culture has some cults that do <strong>crazy</strong> <acronym title="shit"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> s&*$?%t</span></acronym> for no explainable reason.</p>
<p>Can you imagine space aliens landing in Jones Town where Jim Jones the<br />
cult leader gave everyone grape Kool-Ade and they all committed suicide.</p>
<p>First thing they would have said is &#8220;MUST BE <strong>GLOBAL</strong> <strong>WARMING</strong>&#8221;</p>
<p></ww8></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/18/baby-seals-killed-by-glacier-melt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 Reasons The U.S. Is No Longer The Land Of The Free&gt;&gt;&gt; Surprise, your house is on fire you better call home.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/18/10-reasons-the-u-s-is-no-longer-the-land-of-the-free-surprise-your-house-is-on-fire-you-better-call-home-3/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/18/10-reasons-the-u-s-is-no-longer-the-land-of-the-free-surprise-your-house-is-on-fire-you-better-call-home-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Queda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CONTROL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FALSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Tue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLANES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoorghis Jurgis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/17/2012 8:48 PM, Yoorghis @&#038;*$?%Jurgis.net wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:36:50 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: > >>>> First you say Bush ignored the terrorists in (a) and then you complain >>>> when Bush takes the fight to their front yard instead of fighting in our >>>> own front yard in (c)&#8230;.. >>> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/17/2012 8:48 PM, <a href="mailto:Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net">Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Tue</strong>, 17 Jan 2012 18:36:50 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>>>> First you say Bush ignored the terrorists in (a) and then you complain<br />
>>>> when Bush takes the fight to their front yard instead of fighting in our<br />
>>>> own front yard in (c)&#8230;..<br />
>>><br />
>>> Jesus, are you stupid<br />
>>><br />
>>> a) the 9-<strong>11</strong> terrorists were not in Iraq<br />
>><br />
>> Bush SAID ALL <strong>TERRORISTS</strong> and anyone hiding them and anyone threatening<br />
>> the <strong>USA</strong>.  And that was <strong>IRAQ</strong>! It was also a good place for a military<br />
>> base.  And they shot at our <strong>AIR</strong> <strong>PLANES</strong>.<br />
><br />
> Nope, wrong again.<br />
><br />
> Iraq had no planes to &#8220;fly around in&#8221;, paper airplanes are<br />
> ineffectual.</p>
<p>I said they shot at our planes.</p>
<p>> *Saddam would not allow anyone to rival* his authority (like <strong>Al Queda</strong>)</p>
<p>so says you&#8230;  and in your next sentence you contradict yourself.</p>
<p>>  *Iraq was under <strong>CONTROL</strong>* of the <strong>UN</strong> and policy enforced by THEIR command<br />
> and control and had been for years</p>
<p>Then Bush attacked the <strong>UN</strong>.    I call that a positive thing.</p>
<p>> Lastly, The time period from Jan 1 2003, to the Date of<br />
> invasion&#8212;-ALL of bush&#8217;s claims were proven <strong>FALSE</strong></p>
<p>And many more claims were proven false&#8230;..  the first casualty of war<br />
is the truth.</p>
<p>Remember that,   the next time your <strong>Democrat Representatives</strong> vote to go<br />
to war in a place like Iraq or <strong>Libya</strong>.</p>
<p>> ALL OF THEM (except that Saddam was a bad guy)</p>
<p>If Saddam was a Murderer then he was Like Qaddafi.</p>
<p>Since you support killing Qaddafi then you have no legitimate complaint<br />
about killing Saddam.</p>
</thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/18/10-reasons-the-u-s-is-no-longer-the-land-of-the-free-surprise-your-house-is-on-fire-you-better-call-home-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 Reasons The U.S. Is No Longer The Land Of The Free&gt;&gt;&gt; Surprise, your house is on fire you better call home.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/18/10-reasons-the-u-s-is-no-longer-the-land-of-the-free-surprise-your-house-is-on-fire-you-better-call-home-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/18/10-reasons-the-u-s-is-no-longer-the-land-of-the-free-surprise-your-house-is-on-fire-you-better-call-home-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Queda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CONTROL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FALSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Tue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLANES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoorghis Jurgis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/17/2012 8:48 PM, Yoorghis @&#038;*$?%Jurgis.net wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:36:50 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: > >>>> First you say Bush ignored the terrorists in (a) and then you complain >>>> when Bush takes the fight to their front yard instead of fighting in our >>>> own front yard in (c)&#8230;.. >>> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/17/2012 8:48 PM, <a href="mailto:Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net">Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Tue</strong>, 17 Jan 2012 18:36:50 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>>>> First you say Bush ignored the terrorists in (a) and then you complain<br />
>>>> when Bush takes the fight to their front yard instead of fighting in our<br />
>>>> own front yard in (c)&#8230;..<br />
>>><br />
>>> Jesus, are you stupid<br />
>>><br />
>>> a) the 9-<strong>11</strong> terrorists were not in Iraq<br />
>><br />
>> Bush SAID ALL <strong>TERRORISTS</strong> and anyone hiding them and anyone threatening<br />
>> the <strong>USA</strong>.  And that was <strong>IRAQ</strong>! It was also a good place for a military<br />
>> base.  And they shot at our <strong>AIR</strong> <strong>PLANES</strong>.<br />
><br />
> Nope, wrong again.<br />
><br />
> Iraq had no planes to &#8220;fly around in&#8221;, paper airplanes are<br />
> ineffectual.</p>
<p>I said they shot at our planes.</p>
<p>> Saddam would not allow anyone to rival his authority (like <strong>Al Queda</strong>)</p>
<p>so says you&#8230;</p>
<p>>  Iraq was under <strong>CONTROL</strong> of the <strong>UN</strong> and policy enforced by THEIR command<br />
> and control and had been for years</p>
<p>Then Bush attacked the <strong>UN</strong>.    I call that a positive thing.</p>
<p>> Lastly, The time period from Jan 1 2003, to the Date of<br />
> invasion&#8212;-ALL of bush&#8217;s claims were proven <strong>FALSE</strong></p>
<p>And many more claims were proven false&#8230;..  the first casualty of war<br />
is the truth.</p>
<p>Remember that,   the next time your <strong>Democrat Representatives</strong> vote to go<br />
to war in a place like Iraq or <strong>Libya</strong>.</p>
<p>> ALL OF THEM (except that Saddam was a bad guy)</p>
<p>If Saddam was a Murderer then he was Like Qaddafi.</p>
<p>Since you support killing Qaddafi then you have no legitimate complaint<br />
about killing Saddam.</p>
</thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/18/10-reasons-the-u-s-is-no-longer-the-land-of-the-free-surprise-your-house-is-on-fire-you-better-call-home-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s _Always_ Easy To Turn the Tables On Empty Looneytarian Rhetoric Like McConnel&#8217;s</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/18/its-_always_-easy-to-turn-the-tables-on-empty-looneytarian-rhetoric-like-mcconnels/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/18/its-_always_-easy-to-turn-the-tables-on-empty-looneytarian-rhetoric-like-mcconnels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conjunction Junction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/17/2012 10:08 PM, ala wrote: > > &#8220;sarge&#8221; wrote in message > news:e29ef7b7-ebc3-4776-9811-7ad66d1878dc @&#038;*$?%m20g2000vbf.googlegroups.com&#8230; > >> I guess, to answer my own question, he can&#8217;t. > > > things that make me say aw c&#038;*$?%p: finding an apostrophe in can&#8217;t :having to watch &#8220;Conjunction Junction&#8221; again?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/17/2012 <strong>10</strong>:08 PM, ala wrote:<br />
><br />
> &#8220;sarge&#8221; <greasetheweal @yahoo.com> wrote in message<br />
> news:e29ef7b7-ebc3-4776-9811-7ad66d1878dc<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>m20g2000vbf.googlegroups.com&#8230;<br />
><br />
>> I guess, to answer my own question, he can&#8217;t.<br />
><br />
><br />
> things that make me say aw <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym>: finding an apostrophe in can&#8217;t<br />
:having to watch &#8220;<strong>Conjunction Junction</strong>&#8221; again?</p>
<p></greasetheweal></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/18/its-_always_-easy-to-turn-the-tables-on-empty-looneytarian-rhetoric-like-mcconnels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNN contributor salutes Marines for urinating on dead Afghans &lt; &lt; &lt; GO NWO!!!</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/18/cnn-contributor-salutes-marines-for-urinating-on-dead-afghans-go-nwo-3/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/18/cnn-contributor-salutes-marines-for-urinating-on-dead-afghans-go-nwo-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AUDIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NWO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/18/2012 2:08 AM, Ray Fischer wrote: > BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >> On 1/16/2012 10:28 PM, Ray Fischer wrote: >>> BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>>> On 1/15/2012 11:51 AM, Möebius Pretzel wrote: >>>>> CNN contributor salutes Marines for urinating on dead Afghans (AUDIO) >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> If there is any punishment it should be for *recording* the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/18/2012 2:08 AM, Ray Fischer wrote:<br />
> BeamMeUpScotty
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>> On 1/16/2012 <strong>10</strong>:28 PM, Ray Fischer wrote:<br />
>>> BeamMeUpScotty  </thendestroyeverything>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>>>> On 1/15/2012 <strong>11</strong>:51 AM, Möebius Pretzel wrote:<br />
>>>>> <strong>CNN</strong> contributor salutes Marines for urinating on dead Afghans (<strong>AUDIO</strong>)<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> <embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7s_UVtCiLy4&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> If there is any punishment it should be for *recording* the actions on<br />
>>>> video, NOT for pissing on the Taliban&#8230;.. dead or alive.<br />
>>><br />
>>> What a good little murderous <acronym title="turd"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> t&*$?%d</span></acronym> you are.<br />
>><br />
>> I have nothing to do with murder&#8230;.<br />
><br />
> Except for when you cheer murder.<br />
><br />
>>  I was talking of treating the dead<br />
>> and the murderers of 3000 <strong>NYC</strong> workers.<br />
><br />
> So you&#8217;re justifying murder with the lie that the dead people being<br />
> pissed on had something to do with 9/<strong>11</strong>.<br />
><br />
> That&#8217;s the sort of hate that killed millions of Jews.<br />
><br />
>> It&#8217;s far better than what you would do to a baby in the uterus.<br />
><br />
> Are you insane?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m NOT the one killing human life, so if I am insane&#8230;.  I&#8217;m far less<br />
dangerous than you.</p>
</thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/18/cnn-contributor-salutes-marines-for-urinating-on-dead-afghans-go-nwo-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If you work for a living you pay the highest taxes! Romney Says His Effective Tax Rate Is &#8216;Probably&#8217; 15%</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/18/if-you-work-for-a-living-you-pay-the-highest-taxes-romney-says-his-effective-tax-rate-is-probably-15-6/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/18/if-you-work-for-a-living-you-pay-the-highest-taxes-romney-says-his-effective-tax-rate-is-probably-15-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOVERNMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the poor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/18/2012 10:20 AM, Sid9 wrote: > > &#8220;Gary Forbis&#8221; wrote in message > news:e814abf1-6488-40c3-9dd4-47e5b958c2a7 @&#038;*$?%gg10g2000pbc.googlegroups.com&#8230; >> I think we have to disagree again about that CBO report. >> We&#8217;ve covered this area before. While CBO is supposed to be >> party independent it isn&#8217;t always. >> >> On Jan 18, 5:11 am, jane wrote: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/18/2012 <strong>10</strong>:20 AM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
><br />
> &#8220;Gary Forbis&#8221; <forbisgaryg @msn.com> wrote in message<br />
> news:e814abf1-6488-40c3-9dd4-47e5b958c2a7<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>gg10g2000pbc.googlegroups.com&#8230;<br />
>> I think we have to disagree again about that <strong>CBO</strong> report.<br />
>> We&#8217;ve covered this area before.  While <strong>CBO</strong> is supposed to be<br />
>> party independent it isn&#8217;t always.<br />
>><br />
>> On Jan 18, 5:<strong>11</strong> am, jane <jane .pla...@gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>>> On Jan 18, 2:04 am, Gary Forbis <forbisga ...@msn.com> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>  For<br />
>>> example, they use the <strong>SS</strong> <strong>insurance</strong> program to try and stimulate the<br />
>>> economy by lowering the <strong>insurance</strong> premiums at a time when the <strong>SS</strong><br />
>>> program is running a deficit.<br />
>><br />
>> It&#8217;s still not running a deficit.  It is using some of its interest<br />
>> payment.<br />
>> The fund is still growing year over year.<br />
><br />
> I need to pause and shed a tear for our tax <strong>system</strong> that has impoverished<br />
> the wealthy among us.<br />
> What bullshit!</p>
<p>Worse is the tax <strong>system</strong> hurts <strong>the poor</strong> by killing job creation.</p>
<p>The <strong>system</strong> is built to keep the Private sector working and growing but<br />
Obama&#8217;s <strong>Socialism</strong> and <strong>BIG</strong> <strong>GOVERNMENT</strong> supported by high <strong>taxes</strong> is causing<br />
the opposite to happen.</p>
<p>Every dollar printed or borrowed is a tax, because someone has to pay<br />
it. If NOT you today, your child tomorrow.  But it will be paid by the<br />
<strong>GDP</strong> and the Private sector that pays all bills for all the Government<br />
spending.  And when you have government using the <strong>GDP</strong>, the Private<br />
sector has less to use to grow and expand.</p>
<p>The scales are no longer balanced.    Government is too heavy and the<br />
Private sector can&#8217;t continue to hold up the weight of the Government<br />
<strong>Socialism</strong>.  The Private sector is/has been shrinking.</p>
<p></forbisga></jane></forbisgaryg></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/18/if-you-work-for-a-living-you-pay-the-highest-taxes-romney-says-his-effective-tax-rate-is-probably-15-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 Reasons The U.S. Is No Longer The Land Of The Free&gt;&gt;&gt; Surprise, your house is on fire you better call home.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/17/10-reasons-the-u-s-is-no-longer-the-land-of-the-free-surprise-your-house-is-on-fire-you-better-call-home/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/17/10-reasons-the-u-s-is-no-longer-the-land-of-the-free-surprise-your-house-is-on-fire-you-better-call-home/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIDN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EVER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mr President America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Tue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perl Harbor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLANES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoorghis Jurgis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/17/2012 5:11 PM, Yoorghis @&#038;*$?%Jurgis.net wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:51:02 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: > >> On 1/17/2012 3:28 PM, Yoorghis @&#038;*$?%Jurgis.net wrote: >>> On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 09:23:50 -0600, &#8220;Eddie Haskell&#8221; >>> wrote: >>> >>>>> No mention that the Bush administration&#8217;s CIA and FBI on 9/11 >>>>> criminally fumbled [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/17/2012 5:<strong>11</strong> PM, <a href="mailto:Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net">Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Tue</strong>, 17 Jan 2012 15:51:02 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> On 1/17/2012 3:28 PM, <a href="mailto:Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net">Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
>>> <strong>On Tue</strong>, 17 Jan 2012 09:23:50 -0600, &#8220;Eddie Haskell&#8221; <rrhv @wqpm.com><br />
>>> wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>>> No mention that the Bush administration&#8217;s CIA and FBI on 9/<strong>11</strong><br />
>>>>> criminally fumbled America into the position(s) we&#8217;re in today.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> You dumb <acronym title="bastard"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> b&*$?%d</span></acronym>.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Oh?<br />
>>><br />
>>> And why then did Bush:<br />
>>><br />
>>> a) ignore the briefing given him when Clinton left&#8212;that a rising<br />
>>> threat of Terrorism existed and had already been attempted once (or<br />
>>> so)?<br />
>>><br />
>>> b) Work on tax cuts instead of Terrorism detection?<br />
>>><br />
>>> c) then go on to initiate a series of lies to start a war&#8212;when NO<br />
>>> evidence of any kind linked 9-<strong>11</strong> to Iraq.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> First you say Bush ignored the terrorists in (a) and then you complain<br />
>> when Bush takes the fight to their front yard instead of fighting in our<br />
>> own front yard in (c)&#8230;..<br />
><br />
> Jesus, are you stupid<br />
><br />
> a) the 9-<strong>11</strong> terrorists were not in Iraq</p>
<p>Bush SAID ALL <strong>TERRORISTS</strong> and anyone hiding them and anyone threatening<br />
the <strong>USA</strong>.  And that was IRAQ! It was also a good place for a military<br />
base.  And they shot at our <strong>AIR</strong> <strong>PLANES</strong>.</p>
<p>> b) the 9-<strong>11</strong> terrorists were not citizens of the nation they were holed<br />
> up in.</p>
<p>Obama is bombing Al Qaeda in <strong>Yemen</strong> and in <strong>Pakistan</strong> with drones&#8230;.<br />
Obama shot Osama <strong>Bin Laden</strong> in the head and <strong>Bin Laden</strong> wasn&#8217;t in his home<br />
country?   War broke out in a compound in <strong>Pakistan</strong> where the terrorist<br />
wasn&#8217;t a citizen&#8230;.    That was Obama crossing borders and waging war<br />
outside the terrorists homeland.</p>
<p><strong>DIDN</strong>&#8216;t matter one little bit.  If you side with terrorists&#8230;.  Bush<br />
said; you will be treated the same as the terrorists.</p>
<p>> c) Iraq had nothing to do with 9-<strong>11</strong></p>
<p>Iraq/Saddam was causing other problems and you seem to be having<br />
troubles multitasking, Congress got the list and voted to approve the<br />
war.  The fact that they were or weren&#8217;t  part of 9/<strong>11</strong> is NOT really<br />
pertinent.  Iraq was still a terrorist problem,   We were against all<br />
terrorism NOT just the one single act of terrorism.</p>
<p>I see that you don&#8217;t have the capacity to keep multiple ideas alive in<br />
your head at the same time, you&#8217;re a one track mind and you can&#8217;t<br />
entertain the idea of two wars with two different terrorist enemies at<br />
the same time.</p>
<p>We were never attacked by Hitler, Japan bombed <strong>Perl Harbor</strong> and the <strong>USA</strong><br />
went to kill Hitler but HITLER never bombed <strong>Perl Harbor</strong>.</p>
<p>What a crazy guy that Roosevelt was&#8230;  I bet he made a face when Perl<br />
harbor was destroyed.  And then he declared war on Hitler? What the hell<br />
was that about?</p>
<p>> d) Iraq posed NO threat to America.</p>
<p>What threat did Libya or Kosovo pose to America?</p>
<p>The <strong>UN</strong> was passing resolutions asking someone to secure the Iraq problem<br />
militarily we did the fly over missions?    Bush and the <strong>UN</strong> and congress<br />
agreed to do it when it came to invasion.</p>
<p>The <strong>Democrats</strong> and <strong>UN</strong> may have had buyers remorse and tried to back out<br />
of the commitment but we know they were all for it before they were<br />
against it.   And we know <strong>Democrats</strong> are all flip-floppers like <strong>Senator<br />
Kerry</strong>.</p>
<p>> So that silly rebuttal of yours is one of the worst ever written.</p>
<p>I understand that you read Liberal rags that contain propaganda and of<br />
course you&#8217;re deprived of the real facts.</p>
<p>>> You have damned Bush when he did and when he didn&#8217;t.<br />
><br />
> You have made horrible (but expected) idiotic conclusions that have no<br />
> validity.</p>
<p>You separate the war into different zones and say Bush ignored<br />
terrorists in one, but then you whine that he didn&#8217;t ignore Iraq and<br />
terrorists connections there, and in FACT Saddam began openly paying the<br />
terrorists $30,000 to their family for any suicide bomber that killed<br />
people in western cultures.  But Saddam was a terrorist all on his own,<br />
he did gas his own people with WMD so even if it was a bit too late, it<br />
was justice.</p>
<p>> That&#8217;s why you&#8217;re a doofus.</p>
<p>Sure, but take your meds&#8230;</p>
<p>><br />
> BTW, has the look on Bush&#8217;s face when told &#8220;<strong>Mr President America</strong> is<br />
> under attack&#8221;&#8230;.<strong>EVER</strong> Left your thoughts?</p>
<p>I was never concerned with Obama&#8217;s face&#8230;..  I am concerned with his<br />
policies.</p>
<p>> Deer in headlights from a total idiot&#8230;&#8230;had no idea what to do and<br />
> just sat there.</p>
<p>Surprise, your house is on fire you better call home.</p>
<p></rrhv></thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/17/10-reasons-the-u-s-is-no-longer-the-land-of-the-free-surprise-your-house-is-on-fire-you-better-call-home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If you work for a living you pay the highest taxes! Romney Says His Effective Tax Rate Is &#8216;Probably&#8217; 15%</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/17/if-you-work-for-a-living-you-pay-the-highest-taxes-romney-says-his-effective-tax-rate-is-probably-15-3/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/17/if-you-work-for-a-living-you-pay-the-highest-taxes-romney-says-his-effective-tax-rate-is-probably-15-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ENTIRE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EXXON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GROSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIGH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INCOME]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INDUSTRY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LOW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAKES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Buffett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/17/2012 3:50 PM, Gary Forbis wrote: > On Jan 17, 11:58 am, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: > >> Yet raising taxes could lower the actual revenue that goes into the >> Treasury. If raising taxes slows the economy and you get less revenue >> into the treasury what will you do > > Remember the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/17/2012 3:50 PM, Gary Forbis wrote:<br />
> On Jan 17, <strong>11</strong>:58 am, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> Yet raising <strong>taxes</strong> could lower the actual revenue that goes into the<br />
>> Treasury.   If raising <strong>taxes</strong> slows the economy and you get less revenue<br />
>> into the treasury what will you do<br />
><br />
> Remember the economy is about the transfer of goods and services<br />
> rather than the accumulation of the same.  Where 100,000,000 people<br />
> spending $<strong>10</strong> each generates a billon dollars worth of economic<br />
> activity<br />
> a single individual would have to spend that billion dollars.</p>
<p>Activity is *NOT* creating <strong>wealth</strong>&#8230;..</p>
<p><strong>Warren Buffett</strong> does spend a billion dollars and so does <strong>EXXON</strong> on any<br />
given day.   There are thousands of companies and people that can piss a<br />
billion dollars down a hole and not even care.</p>
<p>So what was your point here?</p>
<p>The economy is NOT about transferring, it is about accumulating, I see<br />
now why &#8220;you&#8221; are poor and in debt.</p>
<p>It helps you accumulate <strong>wealth</strong> when the economy is liquid and <strong>money</strong><br />
velocity is NOT too <strong>HIGH</strong> or too <strong>LOW</strong>.</p>
<p>> Because investment income is taxed at a lower rate than wage income<br />
> the same billion dollars spent from wages means more <strong>money</strong> into the<br />
> treasury than if invested.</p>
<p>Or that fewer people will choose to earn more wage. Why work 80 hours a<br />
week when you still only take home the same old $500 a week that you<br />
made when working 40 hours.  Why work 40 when you end up with the same<br />
as working 20&#8230;.</p>
<p>> This is a bit of a maze.  When someone invests <strong>money</strong> into a business<br />
> the business spends it.  The expenses, that is the spending of the<br />
> business, that go into the price of goods sold is deducted from<br />
> revenues<br />
> to determine income.</p>
<p>NOT quite, the (income) was all they made, and &#8220;Profit&#8221; is what is left<br />
when you deduct the costs from the income.  Then they pay tax on that<br />
profit.</p>
<p>Usually called <strong>GROSS</strong> <strong>INCOME</strong> and <strong>NET</strong> <strong>INCOME</strong> in your paycheck.  Gross<br />
being what you earned and <strong>NET</strong> being what you are actually going to get<br />
to spend.</p>
<p>>  While the business pays some parts of payroll<br />
> <strong>taxes</strong> Republicans don&#8217;t like to consider payroll <strong>taxes</strong> when<br />
> determining<br />
> individual&#8217;s <strong>taxes</strong>.  The wages paid by businesses to its labor force<br />
> are<br />
> taxed and the individuals pay.  Sorting out how to analyse this stuff<br />
> takes<br />
> time.</p>
<p>IT <strong>TAKES</strong> AN <strong>ENTIRE</strong> <strong>INDUSTRY</strong>&#8230;.</p>
</thendestroyeveryth>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/17/if-you-work-for-a-living-you-pay-the-highest-taxes-romney-says-his-effective-tax-rate-is-probably-15-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 Reasons The U.S. Is No Longer The Land Of The Free</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/17/10-reasons-the-u-s-is-no-longer-the-land-of-the-free/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/17/10-reasons-the-u-s-is-no-longer-the-land-of-the-free/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[23]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eddie Haskell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Tue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoorghis Jurgis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/17/2012 3:28 PM, Yoorghis @&#038;*$?%Jurgis.net wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 09:23:50 -0600, &#8220;Eddie Haskell&#8221; > wrote: > >>> No mention that the Bush administration&#8217;s CIA and FBI on 9/11 >>> criminally fumbled America into the position(s) we&#8217;re in today. >> >> You dumb b&#038;*$?%d. > > Oh? > > And why then [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/17/2012 3:28 PM, <a href="mailto:Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net">Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Tue</strong>, 17 Jan 2012 09:<strong>23</strong>:50 -0600, &#8220;<strong>Eddie Haskell</strong>&#8221; <rrhv @wqpm.com><br />
> wrote:<br />
><br />
>>> No mention that the Bush administration&#8217;s <strong>CIA</strong> and <strong>FBI</strong> on 9/<strong>11</strong><br />
>>> criminally fumbled America into the position(s) we&#8217;re in today.<br />
>><br />
>> You dumb <acronym title="bastard"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> b&*$?%d</span></acronym>.<br />
><br />
> Oh?<br />
><br />
> And why then did Bush:<br />
><br />
> a) ignore the briefing given him when <strong>Clinton</strong> left&#8212;that a rising<br />
> threat of Terrorism existed and had already been attempted once (or<br />
> so)?<br />
><br />
> b) Work on tax cuts instead of Terrorism detection?<br />
><br />
> c) then go on to initiate a series of lies to start a war&#8212;when NO<br />
> evidence of any kind linked 9-<strong>11</strong> to <strong>Iraq</strong>.</p>
<p>First you say Bush ignored the <strong>terrorists</strong> in (a) and then you complain<br />
when Bush takes the fight to their front yard instead of fighting in our<br />
own front yard in (c)&#8230;..</p>
<p>You have damned Bush when he did and when he didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p></rrhv></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/17/10-reasons-the-u-s-is-no-longer-the-land-of-the-free/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I went to Government schools, but I&#8217;m still willing to learn&gt;&gt;&gt;you were silent about Obama speaking out against TEA PARTY individuals and groups&gt;&gt; You still chastise McCarthy for saying Communists were the enemy</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/17/i-went-to-government-schools-but-im-still-willing-to-learnyou-were-silent-about-obama-speaking-out-against-tea-party-individuals-and-groups-you-still-chastise-mccarthy-for-saying-communists-wer-4/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/17/i-went-to-government-schools-but-im-still-willing-to-learnyou-were-silent-about-obama-speaking-out-against-tea-party-individuals-and-groups-you-still-chastise-mccarthy-for-saying-communists-wer-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Qaeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PARTY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yellow Cake]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/17/2012 2:06 PM, Gary Forbis wrote: > On Jan 17, 9:15 am, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: >> On 1/17/2012 12:25 AM, Gary Forbis wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Jan 16, 11:49 am, BeamMeUpScotty >>> wrote: >>>> On 1/16/2012 2:34 PM, Gary Forbis wrote: >> >>>>> On Jan 16, 10:07 am, BeamMeUpScotty >>>>> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/17/2012 2:06 PM, Gary Forbis wrote:<br />
> On Jan 17, 9:15 am, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>> On 1/17/2012 12:25 AM, Gary Forbis wrote:<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>> On Jan 16, <strong>11</strong>:49 am, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>>> </thendestroyeveryth>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>>>> On 1/16/2012 2:34 PM, Gary Forbis wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>> On Jan 16, <strong>10</strong>:07 am, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>>>>> </thendestroyeveryth>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>>>>>> On 1/16/2012 <strong>10</strong>:35 AM, Gary Forbis wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>> Freedom of<br />
>>>>>>> speech is there to protect unpopular speech.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> Yes but you think McCarthy was supposed to have been silenced.<br />
>><br />
>>>>> What McCarthy thinks and says as a private individual is quite<br />
>>>>> different than the acts he took under the mantle of the government.<br />
>><br />
>>>>> As always the right wing supports big government intrusion into<br />
>>>>> the private life of the people for the benefit of the few who would<br />
>>>>> <strong>rule</strong> over the rest of us.<br />
>><br />
>>>> I see&#8230;. you&#8217;re arguing tactics?<br />
>><br />
>>>> You&#8217;re suggesting the government doesn&#8217;t have free speech.<br />
>><br />
>>> Only individuals have free speech.  The government cannot<br />
>>> be responsive to the people if it controls political speech or<br />
>>> directs it through propiganda.<br />
>><br />
>>>> Yet you support Obama lying to us all day long.<br />
>><br />
>>> I do not.  I don&#8217;t see Obama lying.  I see Obama being too<br />
>>> optimistic at times.  Lying is more along the lines of the<br />
>>> Bush &#8220;<strong>Yellow Cake</strong>&#8221; justification for war.  Can you give example<br />
>>> of out right Obama lies?  Please don&#8217;t cite opinions just facts.<br />
>>> A lie is something one says one knows to be incorrect.<br />
>><br />
>> But you see McCarthy saying there are Communists enemy in government as<br />
>> a lie?<br />
><br />
> Not all communists are enemies of the <strong>United States</strong>.  McCarthy wasn&#8217;t<br />
> persuing people for their actions but for their associations and<br />
> political<br />
> beliefs.</p>
<p>You mean as today we pursue terrorist jihadists amongst the Muslims in<br />
the government and military today?</p>
<p>> &#8220;Are you now or have you ever been a member of the Communist<br />
> party?&#8221;</p>
<p>Are you now or have you ever been a member of <strong>Al Qaeda</strong>?</p>
<p>The difference is then it was the theft of National secrets and today it<br />
was the death/theft of life of 3000 innocent <strong>NY</strong> working people.</p>
<p>> <strong>Reagan</strong> named quite a few <strong>SIG</strong> members and they were blacklisted.</p>
<p>I still don&#8217;t want any <strong>Socialists</strong> in my house. I have no interests in<br />
supporting stupidity.  I have no problem with people suspected of<br />
certain activity from not getting government clearance to sensitive<br />
information&#8230;.    If the government can lock you out on suspicion and<br />
refuse you a job needing a high security clearance, why can I NOT do the<br />
same.</p>
<p>> McCarthy was using the government to destroy people for their beliefs.</p>
<p>NO&#8230; he was searching for hate filled communists that would do what <strong>Al<br />
Qaeda</strong> has done.</p>
<p>> McCarthy was an enemy of the <strong>United States</strong>.</p>
<p>McCarthy was NO more an enemy than Obama&#8230;. who is doing the same thing<br />
when Obama ruins peoples lives because they&#8217;re NOT <strong>Socialists</strong> like him.</p>
</thendestroyeveryth>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/17/i-went-to-government-schools-but-im-still-willing-to-learnyou-were-silent-about-obama-speaking-out-against-tea-party-individuals-and-groups-you-still-chastise-mccarthy-for-saying-communists-wer-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNN contributor salutes Marines for urinating on dead Afghans &lt; &lt; &lt; GO NWO!!!</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/17/cnn-contributor-salutes-marines-for-urinating-on-dead-afghans-go-nwo-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/17/cnn-contributor-salutes-marines-for-urinating-on-dead-afghans-go-nwo-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AUDIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NWO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/16/2012 10:28 PM, Ray Fischer wrote: > BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >> On 1/15/2012 11:51 AM, Möebius Pretzel wrote: >>> CNN contributor salutes Marines for urinating on dead Afghans (AUDIO) >>> >>> >> >> If there is any punishment it should be for *recording* the actions on >> video, NOT for pissing on the Taliban&#8230;.. dead [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/16/2012 <strong>10</strong>:28 PM, Ray Fischer wrote:<br />
> BeamMeUpScotty
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>> On 1/15/2012 <strong>11</strong>:51 AM, Möebius Pretzel wrote:<br />
>>> <strong>CNN</strong> contributor salutes Marines for urinating on dead Afghans (<strong>AUDIO</strong>)<br />
>>><br />
>>> <embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7s_UVtCiLy4&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /><br />
>><br />
>> If there is any punishment it should be for *recording* the actions on<br />
>> video, NOT for pissing on the Taliban&#8230;.. dead or alive.<br />
><br />
> What a good little murderous <acronym title="turd"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> t&*$?%d</span></acronym> you are.</p>
<p>I have nothing to do with murder&#8230;.  I was talking of treating the dead<br />
and the murderers of 3000 <strong>NYC</strong> workers.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s far better than what you would do to a baby in the uterus. That is<br />
murderous.</p>
<p>To humiliate and disrespect a murderer or a dead murderer is NOT evil,<br />
it tells the youth what is acceptable to civilized society and murder is<br />
a vile act that will gain you no respect from us.</p>
<p>There should be more of these actions that show the youth what you<br />
should expect if you violate societies taboos. Rather than the Taliban<br />
who try to make <strong>terrorists</strong> into martyrs and elevated status&#8230;  because<br />
when they do that and look up to murderers, you get more murderous<br />
behavior.</p>
</thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/17/cnn-contributor-salutes-marines-for-urinating-on-dead-afghans-go-nwo-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I went to Government schools, but I&#8217;m still willing to learn&gt;&gt;&gt;you were silent about Obama speaking out against TEA PARTY individuals and groups&gt;&gt; You still chastise McCarthy for saying Communists were the enemy</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/17/i-went-to-government-schools-but-im-still-willing-to-learnyou-were-silent-about-obama-speaking-out-against-tea-party-individuals-and-groups-you-still-chastise-mccarthy-for-saying-communists-wer-3/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/17/i-went-to-government-schools-but-im-still-willing-to-learnyou-were-silent-about-obama-speaking-out-against-tea-party-individuals-and-groups-you-still-chastise-mccarthy-for-saying-communists-wer-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PARTY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yellow Cake]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/17/2012 12:25 AM, Gary Forbis wrote: > On Jan 16, 11:49 am, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: >> On 1/16/2012 2:34 PM, Gary Forbis wrote: >> >>> On Jan 16, 10:07 am, BeamMeUpScotty >>> wrote: >>>> On 1/16/2012 10:35 AM, Gary Forbis wrote: >> >>>>> Freedom of >>>>> speech is there to protect unpopular speech. >> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/17/2012 12:25 AM, Gary Forbis wrote:<br />
> On Jan 16, <strong>11</strong>:49 am, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>> On 1/16/2012 2:34 PM, Gary Forbis wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>> On Jan 16, <strong>10</strong>:07 am, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>>> </thendestroyeveryth>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>>>> On 1/16/2012 <strong>10</strong>:35 AM, Gary Forbis wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>> Freedom of<br />
>>>>> speech is there to protect unpopular speech.<br />
>><br />
>>>> Yes but you think McCarthy was supposed to have been silenced.<br />
>><br />
>>> What McCarthy thinks and says as a private individual is quite<br />
>>> different than the acts he took under the mantle of the government.<br />
>><br />
>>> As always the right wing supports big government intrusion into<br />
>>> the private life of the people for the benefit of the few who would<br />
>>> <strong>rule</strong> over the rest of us.<br />
>><br />
>> I see&#8230;. you&#8217;re arguing tactics?<br />
>><br />
>> You&#8217;re suggesting the government doesn&#8217;t have free speech.<br />
><br />
> Only individuals have free speech.  The government cannot<br />
> be responsive to the people if it controls political speech or<br />
> directs it through propiganda.<br />
><br />
>> Yet you support Obama lying to us all day long.<br />
><br />
> I do not.  I don&#8217;t see Obama lying.  I see Obama being too<br />
> optimistic at times.  Lying is more along the lines of the<br />
> Bush &#8220;<strong>Yellow Cake</strong>&#8221; justification for war.  Can you give example<br />
> of out right Obama lies?  Please don&#8217;t cite opinions just facts.<br />
> A lie is something one says one knows to be incorrect.</p>
<p>But you see McCarthy saying there are Communists enemy in government as<br />
a lie?</p>
</thendestroyeveryth>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/17/i-went-to-government-schools-but-im-still-willing-to-learnyou-were-silent-about-obama-speaking-out-against-tea-party-individuals-and-groups-you-still-chastise-mccarthy-for-saying-communists-wer-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AGW is a decietful premise (so is my spelling ability)</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/17/agw-is-a-decietful-premise-so-is-my-spelling-ability/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/17/agw-is-a-decietful-premise-so-is-my-spelling-ability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[23]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbarian Mutual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claudius Denk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transition Zone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/16/2012 2:23 PM, AGWFacts wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 12:19:28 -0800 (PST), Transition Zone > wrote: > >> On Jan 10, 6:46 pm, AGWFacts wrote: >>> On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 12:22:47 -0800 (PST), Barbarian Mutual >>> >>> wrote: >>>> On Jan 3, 4:45 pm, Claudius Denk wrote: > >>>>> Speling isn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/16/2012 2:<strong>23</strong> PM, AGWFacts wrote:<br />
> On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 12:19:28 -0800 (<strong>PST</strong>), <strong>Transition Zone</strong><br />
> <mogulah @hotmail.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> On Jan <strong>10</strong>, 6:46 pm, AGWFacts <agwfa ...@ipcc.org> wrote:<br />
>>> <strong>On Sun</strong>, 8 Jan 2012 12:22:47 -0800 (<strong>PST</strong>), <strong>Barbarian Mutual</strong><br />
>>><br />
>>> <barbarianfinancialservi ...@yahoo.com> wrote:<br />
>>>> On Jan 3, 4:45 pm, <strong>Claudius Denk</strong> <claudiusd ...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:<br />
><br />
>>>>> Speling isn&#8217;t my strong soot [sic].<br />
><br />
>>>> Neither is reading the results of the world&#8217;s top scientists.<br />
><br />
>>> Nor understanding it even when it is dumbed down for him.<br />
><br />
>> Its all politics.  Its all so simple.  Get people not to think or even<br />
>> talk about environmental destruction.  That way, usual suspects can<br />
>> continue and don&#8217;t have to correct what they&#8217;re doing.<br />
><br />
> Three days ago I read about a <strong>USA</strong> politician (guess which<br />
> political party) who objected to the planning of mitigation<br />
> efforts against the effects of human-caused <strong>climate</strong> <strong>change</strong>; the<br />
> shittard insisted he believed the planning is &#8220;engaging in<br />
> politics,&#8221; instead of engaging in protecting the <strong>welfare</strong> and<br />
> property of Americans.</p>
<p>Without proof that <strong>Global</strong> Warming is real and, humans caused and can fix<br />
it, it is political fear mongering.</p>
<p>We could all hold hands and think &#8220;cool&#8221; and <strong>change</strong> the Temperature with<br />
our minds.   Like we do for peace at some political rallies.</p>
<p></claudiusd></barbarianfinancialservi></agwfa></mogulah></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/17/agw-is-a-decietful-premise-so-is-my-spelling-ability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I went to Government schools, but I&#8217;m still willing to learn&gt;&gt;&gt;you were silent about Obama speaking out against TEA PARTY individuals and groups&gt;&gt; You still chastise McCarthy for saying Communists were the enemy</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/16/i-went-to-government-schools-but-im-still-willing-to-learnyou-were-silent-about-obama-speaking-out-against-tea-party-individuals-and-groups-you-still-chastise-mccarthy-for-saying-communists-wer/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/16/i-went-to-government-schools-but-im-still-willing-to-learnyou-were-silent-about-obama-speaking-out-against-tea-party-individuals-and-groups-you-still-chastise-mccarthy-for-saying-communists-wer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 19:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PARTY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/16/2012 2:34 PM, Gary Forbis wrote: > On Jan 16, 10:07 am, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: >> On 1/16/2012 10:35 AM, Gary Forbis wrote: > >>> Freedom of >>> speech is there to protect unpopular speech. >> >> Yes but you think McCarthy was supposed to have been silenced. > > What McCarthy thinks and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/16/2012 2:34 PM, Gary Forbis wrote:<br />
> On Jan 16, <strong>10</strong>:07 am, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>> On 1/16/2012 <strong>10</strong>:35 AM, Gary Forbis wrote:<br />
><br />
>>> Freedom of<br />
>>> speech is there to protect unpopular speech.<br />
>><br />
>> Yes but you think McCarthy was supposed to have been silenced.<br />
><br />
> What McCarthy thinks and says as a private individual is quite<br />
> different than the acts he took under the mantle of the government.<br />
><br />
> As always the right wing supports big government intrusion into<br />
> the private life of the people for the benefit of the few who would<br />
> <strong>rule</strong> over the rest of us.</p>
<p>I see&#8230;. you&#8217;re arguing tactics?</p>
<p>You&#8217;re suggesting the government doesn&#8217;t have free speech.</p>
<p>Yet you support Obama lying to us all day long.</p>
<p>Obama was damned nasty when talking about the <strong>TEA</strong> <strong>PARTY</strong> who he openly<br />
suggested are his and the Nations enemy&#8230;.</p>
<p>But you were silent about Obama speaking out against <strong>TEA</strong> <strong>PARTY</strong><br />
individuals and groups.  You still chastise McCarthy for saying<br />
Communists were the enemy of the <strong>Capitalist</strong> Republic of the <strong>United States</strong>.</p>
<p>How do you rationalize your duplicitous behavior?</p>
</thendestroyeveryth>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/16/i-went-to-government-schools-but-im-still-willing-to-learnyou-were-silent-about-obama-speaking-out-against-tea-party-individuals-and-groups-you-still-chastise-mccarthy-for-saying-communists-wer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I went to Government schools, but I&#8217;m still unwilling to learn</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/16/i-went-to-government-schools-but-im-still-unwilling-to-learn-15/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/16/i-went-to-government-schools-but-im-still-unwilling-to-learn-15/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Qaeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOVERNMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIDE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ILLEGAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INFORMATION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WORK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YES]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/16/2012 10:35 AM, Gary Forbis wrote: > On Jan 15, 11:44 pm, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: >> On 1/16/2012 2:02 AM, Gary Forbis wrote: > >>> I believe the event is immortialized in &#8220;The Magestic&#8221; >>> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0268995/ >> >>> I only vaguely remember any of the commitee&#8217;s activities. >>> It&#8217;s quite hard to separate memories [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/16/2012 <strong>10</strong>:35 AM, Gary Forbis wrote:<br />
> On Jan 15, <strong>11</strong>:44 pm, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>> On 1/16/2012 2:02 AM, Gary Forbis wrote:<br />
><br />
>>> I believe the event is immortialized in &#8220;The Magestic&#8221;<br />
>>> <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0268995/" >http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0268995/</a><br />
>><br />
>>> I only vaguely remember any of the commitee&#8217;s activities.<br />
>>> It&#8217;s quite hard to separate memories of the events from<br />
>>> the various depictions of it.  None the less it puts the lie<br />
>>> to the notion that this nation allows <strong>freedom</strong> of speech and<br />
>>> association.  Sometime during my school years the rules<br />
>>> changed so I could read Marx without a signed letter from<br />
>>> my parents.<br />
>><br />
>> McCarthy was correct and there were many communists in government.<br />
><br />
> I don&#8217;t believe so.  I will entertain the notion for a moment.<br />
> Suppose McCarthy was correct and there were many communists<br />
> in our society.  So what?  Where in the <strong>Constitution</strong> is it written<br />
> that unpopular beliefs made one unAmerican?</p>
<p>You mean like we imprisoned Japanese for having eyes that were NOT<br />
round?   Later we were in a cold war with Communists yet no one<br />
imprisoned these communists.</p>
<p>And <strong>YES</strong> IT IS <strong>ILLEGAL</strong> TO <strong>HIDE</strong> <strong>INFORMATION</strong> FROM THE <strong>GOVERNMENT</strong> WHEN YOU<br />
<strong>WORK</strong> FOR THE <strong>GOVERNMENT</strong>.   If you are called in for an interview and<br />
they ask what political or radical organizations you belong to and you<br />
omit that you are a communist, it is illegal and a security risk.  Just<br />
as today you can NOT hide being a Jihadist <strong>Al Qaeda</strong> member. And keep in<br />
mind we are NOT in a declared <strong>WAR</strong> with Muslims or Islam.  Just as we<br />
were NOT at war with Communism.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t get clearance to work for the government in some positions<br />
unless you expose all organizations you belong to.</p>
<p>>Freedom of<br />
> speech is there to protect unpopular speech.</p>
<p>Yes but you think McCarthy was supposed to have been silenced.</p>
</thendestroyeveryth>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/16/i-went-to-government-schools-but-im-still-unwilling-to-learn-15/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I went to Government schools, but I&#8217;m still unwilling to learn</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/16/i-went-to-government-schools-but-im-still-unwilling-to-learn-14/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/16/i-went-to-government-schools-but-im-still-unwilling-to-learn-14/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JOINED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KKK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MEMBER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Byrd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/16/2012 10:26 AM, Gary Forbis wrote: > On Jan 15, 11:41 pm, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: >> On 1/16/2012 2:02 AM, Gary Forbis wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Jan 15, 9:44 pm, BeamMeUpScotty >>> wrote: >>>> On 1/15/2012 9:36 PM, Bill Graham wrote: >> >>>>> BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>>>>> On 1/15/2012 12:40 AM, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/16/2012 <strong>10</strong>:26 AM, Gary Forbis wrote:<br />
> On Jan 15, <strong>11</strong>:41 pm, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>> On 1/16/2012 2:02 AM, Gary Forbis wrote:<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>> On Jan 15, 9:44 pm, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>>> </thendestroyeveryth>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>>>> On 1/15/2012 9:36 PM, <strong>Bill Graham</strong> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty wrote:<br />
>>>>>> On 1/15/2012 12:40 AM, Ray Fischer wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty  </thendestroyeveryth>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>> On 1/14/2012 7:15 PM, Ray Fischer wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty  </thendestroyeveryth>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>>> On 1/13/2012 <strong>11</strong>:13 PM, <a href="mailto:Yoorg...@Jurgis.net">Yoorg&#8230;@Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>  &#8220;<strong>Bill Graham</strong>&#8221; <w ...@comcast.net><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/13/2012 2:49 AM, Ray Fischer wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You Liberals do like to Stereotype people,<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL!<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 99.996% on the irony meter!<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You stereotyping people by whining that they stereotype<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people is just the sort of rank, hypocritical, stupidity that<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we keep seeing from you rightard bigots.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you trying to say you leftists don&#8217;t talk about all us<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> conservatives like we were religious bigots?<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>> You mean because of the history of Conservatism/loonytarianism?<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>> And the history of <strong>Democrats</strong> in the <strong>KKK</strong>&#8230;.?<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>> Until the bigots left the Democratic party for the <strong>GOP</strong>?<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>> <strong>Robert Byrd</strong> was a <strong>Democrats</strong> until he died.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>> But he rejected the <strong>KKK</strong>.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>> Unlike you.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> For some reason you let <strong>Democrats</strong> reject their membership in the <strong>KKK</strong><br />
>>>>>> but you won&#8217;t let the rest of us reject a cult that *WE NEVER <strong>JOINED</strong>*.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> Since I was NEVER A <strong>KKK</strong> <strong>MEMBER</strong> I have little to reject.<br />
>><br />
>>>>> I remember back in the 50&#8242;s when Senator McCarthy asked somebody if he<br />
>>>>> was now, or had ever been, a member of the communist party, and the guy<br />
>>>>> said, &#8220;Only to meet girls&#8221;.<br />
>><br />
>>>> Black girls or White girls?<br />
>><br />
>>> God, how <strong>racist</strong> can you be?<br />
>>> What difference does color make?<br />
>><br />
>> Sort of my point&#8230;.<br />
>><br />
>> Liberals make everything about race and then post the most ignorant stuff.<br />
><br />
> Who brought up race?</p>
<p>exactly.</p>
<p>and who gets called a <strong>racist</strong>?</p>
<p><strong>SO</strong> you even think &#8220;YOU&#8221; are the <strong>racist</strong>, because our rolls are always<br />
reversed in reality, this was sting operation to show you your own racism.</p>
<p>Because you are the one calling me a <strong>racist</strong> out of the blue when race<br />
was never mentioned.  This time I did it to see you slam your own <acronym title="dick"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> d&*$?%k</span></acronym><br />
in the door.</p>
<p>Every time I have said Obama is a Socialist and you called me <strong>racist</strong>,<br />
when there is NO race mentioned. It is you that has brought up race.</p>
</thendestroyeveryth></w></thendestroyeveryth>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/16/i-went-to-government-schools-but-im-still-unwilling-to-learn-14/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACORN is an innocent victim of racist anti-American teabagot foxucker hate.  Neut Gingrich, the teabagot Messiah, is guilty of massive vote fraud.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/16/acorn-is-an-innocent-victim-of-racist-anti-american-teabagot-foxucker-hate-neut-gingrich-the-teabagot-messiah-is-guilty-of-massive-vote-fraud/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/16/acorn-is-an-innocent-victim-of-racist-anti-american-teabagot-foxucker-hate-neut-gingrich-the-teabagot-messiah-is-guilty-of-massive-vote-fraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 06:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neut Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Mon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Tue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/15/2012 6:59 AM, * US * wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:56:21 -0800, Bible Studies with Satan wrote: > >> &#8230; conservatives aren&#8217;t smart enough to get money for posting on >> usenet. > > True. > > The smart ones don&#8217;t replicate teabagot lies in subject lines. > > &#8220;the former [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/15/2012 6:59 AM, * <strong>US</strong> * wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Tue</strong>, <strong>10</strong> Jan 2012 <strong>10</strong>:56:21 -0800, Bible Studies with Satan <bible @hotmail.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> &#8230; conservatives aren&#8217;t smart enough to get <strong>money</strong> for posting on<br />
>> usenet.<br />
><br />
> True.<br />
><br />
> The smart ones don&#8217;t replicate teabagot lies in subject lines.<br />
><br />
> &#8220;the former disgraced Speaker of the House turned<br />
> Republican Presidential candidate <strong>Newt Gingrich</strong> had<br />
> admitted to committing massive &#8220;voter fraud&#8221;"<br />
><br />
> <a href="http://www.bradblog.com/?p=9022" >http://www.bradblog.com/?p=9022</a><br />
><br />
> <strong>On Mon</strong>, 09 Jan 2012 13:15:53 -0500, PutYourBeamUpMeSlutty<br />
>
<theydestroyedmybrain @<acronym title="asshole"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> a&*$?%e</span></acronym>.lax.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> &#8230; breaking the law.<br />
><br />
> Neut does that and you kneel and worship him.<br />
><br />
> <strong>On Sun</strong>, 08 Jan 2012 20:12:46 -0500, PutYourBeamUpMeSlutty<br />
> </theydestroyedmybrain>
<theydestroyedmybrain @<acronym title="asshole"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> a&*$?%e</span></acronym>.lax.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> On 1/8/2012 4:44 PM, * <strong>US</strong> * wrote:<br />
>>> <strong>On Sun</strong>, 8 Jan 2012 09:09:17 -0800 (<strong>PST</strong>), <strong>Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars</strong> <walter_evening @post.com> wrote:<br />
>>>> On Jan 6, 8:39 pm, PutYourBeamUpMeSlutty
<theydestroyedmybrain @<acronym title="asshole"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> a&*$?%e</span></acronym>.lax.com> wrote:<br />
>>>>> On 1/6/2012 5:45 PM, &#8211; Me &#8211; I &#8211; My &#8211; wrote:<br />
>>>>>> <strong>ACORN</strong> never registered any voters.<br />
>>>>> &#8230; kinda dumb&#8230;<br />
>>>> What does &#8220;kinda&#8221; mean huh, Mr Distinguished Professor Emeritus ??<br />
>>>> (like your friend <strong>Drug</strong> Rush Limbaugh)<br />
>>><br />
>>> Ha!  Good one.<br />
>><br />
>> &#8230; all<br />
>> twitchy.<br />
><br />
> You&#8217;re also unable to make any sense.<br />
><br />
> On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 20:39:03 -0500, PutYourBeamUpMeSlutty<br />
> </theydestroyedmybrain>
<theydestroyedmybrain @<acronym title="asshole"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> a&*$?%e</span></acronym>.lax.com>  wrote:<br />
><br />
>> &#8230; grants to<br />
>> register voters.<br />
><br />
> <strong>ACORN</strong> was never paid to register voters.<br />
></p>
<p>H.R.3571 &#8211; Defund <strong>ACORN</strong> Act</p>
<p>To prohibit the <strong>Federal</strong> Government from awarding contracts, grants, or<br />
other agreements to, providing any other <strong>Federal</strong> funds to, or engaging<br />
in activities that promote certain indicted organizations&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h3571/show" >http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h3571/show</a></p>
</theydestroyedmybrain></walter_evening></theydestroyedmybrain></bible></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/16/acorn-is-an-innocent-victim-of-racist-anti-american-teabagot-foxucker-hate-neut-gingrich-the-teabagot-messiah-is-guilty-of-massive-vote-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Al Gore seen in public after long absence</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/16/al-gore-seen-in-public-after-long-absence/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/16/al-gore-seen-in-public-after-long-absence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 06:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/15/2012 10:41 AM, Phlip wrote: >> Using what kind of fuel ?? > > Man-Bear-Pig must die!! Al Gore was abducted by Space Aliens, again.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/15/2012 <strong>10</strong>:41 AM, Phlip wrote:<br />
>> Using what kind of fuel ??<br />
><br />
> Man-Bear-Pig must die!!</p>
<p><strong>Al Gore</strong> was abducted by Space Aliens, again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/16/al-gore-seen-in-public-after-long-absence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I challenge Warren Buffett to pay as much tax as I paid, and I Paid 100% of what I was told to pay.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/12/i-challenge-warren-buffett-to-pay-as-much-tax-as-i-paid-and-i-paid-100-of-what-i-was-told-to-pay-3/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/12/i-challenge-warren-buffett-to-pay-as-much-tax-as-i-paid-and-i-paid-100-of-what-i-was-told-to-pay-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 04:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[37]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EXECUTIVE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ole Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Thu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REMEMBER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Buffet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WASHINGTON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZERO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/12/2012 10:37 PM, Sid9 wrote: > > &#8220;BeamMeUpScotty&#8221; wrote in > message news:4F0FA01A.2090803 @&#038;*$?%blackhole.nebulax.com&#8230; >> On 1/12/2012 7:57 PM, First. Post wrote: >>> On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:09:30 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 1/12/2012 5:25 PM, First. Post wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:20:17 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty >>>>> wrote: >>>>> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/12/2012 <strong>10</strong>:<strong>37</strong> PM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
><br />
> &#8220;BeamMeUpScotty&#8221;
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote in<br />
> message news:4F0FA01A.2090803<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>blackhole.nebulax.com&#8230;<br />
>> On 1/12/2012 7:57 PM, First. Post wrote:<br />
>>> <strong>On Thu</strong>, 12 Jan 2012 18:09:30 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>>> </thendestroyeverything>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>> On 1/12/2012 5:25 PM, First. Post wrote:<br />
>>>>> <strong>On Thu</strong>, 12 Jan 2012 16:20:17 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>>>>> </thendestroyeverything>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>>> On 1/12/2012 3:31 PM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> &#8220;BeamMeUpScotty&#8221; </thendestroyeverything>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com>
>>>>>>> wrote in<br />
>>>>>>> message news:4F0F2D03.3030903<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>blackhole.nebulax.com&#8230;<br />
>>>>>>>> On 1/12/2012 12:13 AM, Bret Cahill wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>>> <strong>WASHINGTON</strong> &#8211; U.S. tycoon Warren Buffett has challenged<br />
>>>>>>>>>> Republicans in<br />
>>>>>>>>>> <strong>Congress</strong> to make personal contributions to cut the <strong>US</strong> deficit,<br />
>>>>>>>>>> vowing to<br />
>>>>>>>>>> match their donations dollar-for-dollar.<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> Given the <strong>money</strong> laundering going on in the <strong>Obama Administration</strong>,<br />
>>>>>>>> any<br />
>>>>>>>> <strong>money</strong> you send to Washington D.C. will be fed into the <strong>DNC</strong> and<br />
>>>>>>>> SEIU and<br />
>>>>>>>> <strong>ACORN</strong> and Unions and then back to be used to get Obama re-elected.<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> Why would Republicans take that bait and help fund Obama with<br />
>>>>>>>> Matching<br />
>>>>>>>> dollars.  All the Republicans need to do is set back and wait<br />
>>>>>>>> for Obama<br />
>>>>>>>> and his ilk to confiscate that <strong>money</strong> from Warren Buffett.   That<br />
>>>>>>>> has<br />
>>>>>>>> been the Socialist plan and voice to date, they plan to tax all of<br />
>>>>>>>> Warren Buffett&#8217;s <strong>wealth</strong> from him&#8230;..  without the Republicans help<br />
>>>>>>>> &#8220;<strong>REMEMBER</strong>&#8220;.<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> If Obama can Act without <strong>Congress</strong> to enact all these plans and<br />
>>>>>>>> regulation through signing orders and Executive decree then let<br />
>>>>>>>> Obama<br />
>>>>>>>> take all that ill gotten <strong>money</strong> from <strong>Warren Buffet</strong> with Obama&#8217;s<br />
>>>>>>>> <strong>EXECUTIVE</strong><br />
>>>>>>>> <strong>POWER</strong> and the Republicans don&#8217;t need to lift a finger.<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> .<br />
>>>>>>> .<br />
>>>>>>> <acronym title="Bitch"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> B&*$?%h</span></acronym> McConnell suggested it.<br />
>>>>>>> Buffett took him up on it&#8230;&#8230;<br />
>>>>>>> McConnell is worth about $<strong>10</strong> million.<br />
>>>>>>> Buffett offered to match it 3 for one for McConnell.<br />
>>>>>>> One for one for all the other Republicans&#8230;there&#8217;s almost 300<br />
>>>>>>> Republicans in congress&#8230;.<br />
>>>>>>> How many will kick in?<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> My guess?  <strong>ZERO</strong>!<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> Republicans, like bush,jr, all hat and no cattle.<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> Governing on a dare?<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> Is that what Democrat-Socialists are down to?<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> I dare you to knock that stick off my shoulder&#8230;.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> Why doesn&#8217;t Buffet start by paying the millions he owes in back <strong>taxes</strong><br />
>>>>> instead of fighting it tooth fang and claw with an army of lawyers if<br />
>>>>> he&#8217;s so <acronym title="fucking"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> f&*$?%g</span></acronym> high and mighty?<br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Good point, excellent catch I forgot about Ole` Warren&#8217;s  attitude<br />
>>>> towards paying <strong>taxes</strong>&#8230;.   Let me expand on your most excellent<br />
>>>> catch&#8230;.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> &#8220;I challenge Warren Buffett to pay as much tax as I paid, and I Paid<br />
>>>> 100% of what I was told to pay.&#8221;<br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> <strong>SO</strong> Warren can pay 100% of what they say that he owes.    That will get<br />
>>>> the skids greased won&#8217;t it.<br />
>>><br />
>>> I&#8217;m holding my breath and I know you&#8217;re holding yours until he does<br />
>>> yes?   <strong>ROFL</strong>.<br />
>><br />
>> Well that sort of makes my point&#8230;..<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> He could care less about us!<br />
>><br />
>><br />
> .<br />
> .<br />
> .<br />
> &#8230;as do your wealthy Republican friends who screw you daily.</p>
<p>And I try to make sure they don&#8217;t use the government to force me to bend<br />
over and make it easy for them.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just not friendly that way.</p>
</thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/12/i-challenge-warren-buffett-to-pay-as-much-tax-as-i-paid-and-i-paid-100-of-what-i-was-told-to-pay-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Survey reveals that conflicts between rich and poor now rank ahead of  three other potential sources of group tension—between immigrants and the native born;  between blacks and whites; and between young and old</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/12/survey-reveals-that-conflicts-between-rich-and-poor-now-rank-ahead-of-three-other-potential-sources-of-group-tension%e2%80%94between-immigrants-and-the-native-born-between-blacks-and-whites-and-be/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/12/survey-reveals-that-conflicts-between-rich-and-poor-now-rank-ahead-of-three-other-potential-sources-of-group-tension%e2%80%94between-immigrants-and-the-native-born-between-blacks-and-whites-and-be/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 03:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[43]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Census Bureau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[increased]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JOBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pew Research Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the poor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/12/2012 8:34 PM, tmurf.1 wrote: > On Jan 12, 2:17 pm, Nickname unavailable wrote: >> On Jan 12, 11:47 am, Immortalist wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> &#8230;A new Pew Research Center survey of 2,048 adults finds that about >>> two-thirds of the public (66%) believes there are “very strong” or >>> “strong” [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/12/2012 8:34 PM, tmurf.1 wrote:<br />
> On Jan 12, 2:17 pm, Nickname unavailable <vide ...@tcq.net> wrote:<br />
>> On Jan 12, <strong>11</strong>:47 am, Immortalist <reanimater_2 ...@yahoo.com> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>> &#8230;A new <strong>Pew Research Center</strong> survey of 2,048 adults finds that about<br />
>>> two-thirds of the public (66%) believes there are “very strong” or<br />
>>> “strong” conflicts between the rich and <strong>the poor</strong>—an increase of 19<br />
>>> percentage points since 2009.<br />
>><br />
>>> Not only have perceptions of class conflict grown more prevalent; so,<br />
>>> too, has the belief that these disputes are intense. According to the<br />
>>> new survey, three-in-ten Americans (30%) say there are “very strong<br />
>>> conflicts” between poor people and rich people. That is double the<br />
>>> proportion that offered a similar view in July 2009 and the largest<br />
>>> <strong>share</strong> expressing this opinion since the question was first asked in<br />
>>> 1987.<br />
>><br />
>>> As a result, in the public’s evaluations of divisions within American<br />
>>> society, conflicts between rich and poor now rank ahead of three other<br />
>>> potential sources of group tension—between immigrants and the native<br />
>>> born; between blacks and whites; and between young and old. Back in<br />
>>> 2009, more survey respondents said there were strong conflicts between<br />
>>> immigrants and the native born than said the same about the rich and<br />
>>> <strong>the poor</strong>.<br />
>><br />
>>> Virtually all major demographic groups now perceive significantly more<br />
>>> class conflict than two years ago. However, the survey found that<br />
>>> younger adults, women, <strong>Democrats</strong> and <strong>African Americans</strong> are somewhat<br />
>>> more likely than older people, men, Republicans, whites or Hispanics<br />
>>> to say there are strong disagreements between rich and poor.<br />
>><br />
>>> While blacks are still more likely than whites see serious class<br />
>>> conflicts, the <strong>share</strong> of whites who hold this view has <strong>increased</strong> by 22<br />
>>> percentage points, to 65%, since 2009. At the same time, the<br />
>>> proportion of blacks (74%) and Hispanics (61%) sharing this judgment<br />
>>> has grown by single digits (8 and 6 points, respectively).<br />
>><br />
>>> The biggest increases in perceptions of class conflicts occurred among<br />
>>> political liberals and Americans who say they are not affiliated with<br />
>>> either major party. In each group the proportion who say there are<br />
>>> major disagreements between rich and poor Americans <strong>increased</strong> by more<br />
>>> than 20 percentage points since 2009.<br />
>><br />
>>> These changes in attitudes over a relatively short period of time may<br />
>>> reflect the income and <strong>wealth</strong> inequality message conveyed by Occupy<br />
>>> <strong>Wall Street</strong> protesters across the country in late 2011 that led to a<br />
>>> spike in media attention to the topic. But the changes also may also<br />
>>> reflect a growing public awareness of underlying shifts in the<br />
>>> distribution of <strong>wealth</strong> in American society.<br />
>><br />
>>> According to the most recent U.S. <strong>Census Bureau</strong> data, the proportion<br />
>>> of overall <strong>wealth</strong> — a measure that includes home equity, stocks and<br />
>>> bonds and the value of jewelry, furniture and other possessions — held<br />
>>> by the top <strong>10</strong>% of the population <strong>increased</strong> from 49% in 2005 to 56% in<br />
>>> 2009.<br />
>><br />
>>> Perceptions of the Wealthy<br />
>><br />
>>> While the survey results show a significant shift in public<br />
>>> perceptions of class conflict in American life, they do not<br />
>>> necessarily signal an increase in grievances toward the wealthy. It is<br />
>>> possible that individuals who see more conflict between the classes<br />
>>> think that anger toward the rich is misdirected. Nor do these data<br />
>>> suggest growing support for government measures to reduce income<br />
>>> inequality.<br />
>><br />
>>> In fact, other questions in the survey show that some key attitudes<br />
>>> toward the wealthy have remained largely unchanged. For example, there<br />
>>> has been no <strong>change</strong> in views about whether the rich became wealthy<br />
>>> through personal effort or because they were fortunate enough to be<br />
>>> from wealthy families or have the right connections.<br />
>><br />
>>> A 46% plurality believes that most rich people “are wealthy mainly<br />
>>> because they know the right people or were born into wealthy<br />
>>> families.” But nearly as many have a more favorable view of the rich:<br />
>>> <strong>43</strong>% say wealthy people became rich “mainly because of their own hard<br />
>>> work, ambition or education,” largely unchanged from a Pew survey in<br />
>>> 2008.<br />
>><br />
>>> 1/rising-share-of-americans-s&#8230;</a><br />
>><br />
>>  it appears that the reagan democrats have finally realized they been<br />
>> had. they have figured out that reaganism(greed and<br />
>> selfishness)affected them, not the other guy. the idiots are stunned<br />
>> that its they who are losing their jobs, health, and their homes, not<br />
>> the other guys.<br />
><br />
> Who will fight to defend the 1% when we come after them?</p>
<p>The 99% that like their <strong>JOBS</strong> and <strong>eating</strong>?</p>
<p></reanimater_2></vide></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/12/survey-reveals-that-conflicts-between-rich-and-poor-now-rank-ahead-of-three-other-potential-sources-of-group-tension%e2%80%94between-immigrants-and-the-native-born-between-blacks-and-whites-and-be/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I challenge Warren Buffett to pay as much tax as I paid, and I Paid 100% of what I was told to pay.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/12/i-challenge-warren-buffett-to-pay-as-much-tax-as-i-paid-and-i-paid-100-of-what-i-was-told-to-pay-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/12/i-challenge-warren-buffett-to-pay-as-much-tax-as-i-paid-and-i-paid-100-of-what-i-was-told-to-pay-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 03:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EXECUTIVE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ole Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Thu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REMEMBER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEIU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Buffet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WASHINGTON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZERO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/12/2012 7:57 PM, First. Post wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:09:30 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: > >> On 1/12/2012 5:25 PM, First. Post wrote: >>> On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:20:17 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 1/12/2012 3:31 PM, Sid9 wrote: >>>>> >>>>> &#8220;BeamMeUpScotty&#8221; wrote in >>>>> message news:4F0F2D03.3030903 @&#038;*$?%blackhole.nebulax.com&#8230; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/12/2012 7:57 PM, First. Post wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Thu</strong>, 12 Jan 2012 18:09:30 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> On 1/12/2012 5:25 PM, First. Post wrote:<br />
>>> <strong>On Thu</strong>, 12 Jan 2012 16:20:17 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>>> </thendestroyeverything>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>> On 1/12/2012 3:31 PM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> &#8220;BeamMeUpScotty&#8221; </thendestroyeverything>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote in<br />
>>>>> message news:4F0F2D03.3030903<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>blackhole.nebulax.com&#8230;<br />
>>>>>> On 1/12/2012 12:13 AM, Bret Cahill wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>> <strong>WASHINGTON</strong> &#8211; U.S. tycoon Warren Buffett has challenged Republicans in<br />
>>>>>>>> <strong>Congress</strong> to make personal contributions to cut the <strong>US</strong> deficit,<br />
>>>>>>>> vowing to<br />
>>>>>>>> match their donations dollar-for-dollar.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> Given the <strong>money</strong> laundering going on in the <strong>Obama Administration</strong>, any<br />
>>>>>> <strong>money</strong> you send to Washington D.C. will be fed into the <strong>DNC</strong> and <strong>SEIU</strong> and<br />
>>>>>> <strong>ACORN</strong> and Unions and then back to be used to get Obama re-elected.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> Why would Republicans take that bait and help fund Obama with Matching<br />
>>>>>> dollars.  All the Republicans need to do is set back and wait for Obama<br />
>>>>>> and his ilk to confiscate that <strong>money</strong> from Warren Buffett.   That has<br />
>>>>>> been the Socialist plan and voice to date, they plan to tax all of<br />
>>>>>> Warren Buffett&#8217;s <strong>wealth</strong> from him&#8230;..  without the Republicans help<br />
>>>>>> &#8220;<strong>REMEMBER</strong>&#8220;.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> If Obama can Act without <strong>Congress</strong> to enact all these plans and<br />
>>>>>> regulation through signing orders and Executive decree then let Obama<br />
>>>>>> take all that ill gotten <strong>money</strong> from <strong>Warren Buffet</strong> with Obama&#8217;s <strong>EXECUTIVE</strong><br />
>>>>>> <strong>POWER</strong> and the Republicans don&#8217;t need to lift a finger.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>> .<br />
>>>>> .<br />
>>>>> <acronym title="Bitch"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> B&*$?%h</span></acronym> McConnell suggested it.<br />
>>>>> Buffett took him up on it&#8230;&#8230;<br />
>>>>> McConnell is worth about $<strong>10</strong> million.<br />
>>>>> Buffett offered to match it 3 for one for McConnell.<br />
>>>>> One for one for all the other Republicans&#8230;there&#8217;s almost 300<br />
>>>>> Republicans in congress&#8230;.<br />
>>>>> How many will kick in?<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> My guess?  <strong>ZERO</strong>!<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> Republicans, like bush,jr, all hat and no cattle.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Governing on a dare?<br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Is that what Democrat-Socialists are down to?<br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> I dare you to knock that stick off my shoulder&#8230;.<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>> Why doesn&#8217;t Buffet start by paying the millions he owes in back <strong>taxes</strong><br />
>>> instead of fighting it tooth fang and claw with an army of lawyers if<br />
>>> he&#8217;s so <acronym title="fucking"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> f&*$?%g</span></acronym> high and mighty?<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> Good point, excellent catch I forgot about Ole` Warren&#8217;s  attitude<br />
>> towards paying <strong>taxes</strong>&#8230;.   Let me expand on your most excellent catch&#8230;.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> &#8220;I challenge Warren Buffett to pay as much tax as I paid, and I Paid<br />
>> 100% of what I was told to pay.&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> <strong>SO</strong> Warren can pay 100% of what they say that he owes.    That will get<br />
>> the skids greased won&#8217;t it.<br />
><br />
> I&#8217;m holding my breath and I know you&#8217;re holding yours until he does<br />
> yes?   <strong>ROFL</strong>.</p>
<p>Well that sort of makes my point&#8230;..</p>
<p>He could care less about us!</p>
</thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/12/i-challenge-warren-buffett-to-pay-as-much-tax-as-i-paid-and-i-paid-100-of-what-i-was-told-to-pay-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MITT ROMNEY Touts &#8220;CREATIVE DESTRUCTION&#8221; As Best Path To JOBS!</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/12/mitt-romney-touts-creative-destruction-as-best-path-to-jobs/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/12/mitt-romney-touts-creative-destruction-as-best-path-to-jobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 02:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[23]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobless Angry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JOBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROMNEY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/12/2012 6:39 PM, Old Pif wrote: > On Jan 12, 10:23 am, &#8220;Jobless&#038;Angry&#8221; wrote: > >> >> Both the successes and the failures reveal the candidate’s faith in >> “creative destruction,” the notion that the new must relentlessly >> replace the old so that companies and the economy can become more >> efficient. >> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/12/2012 6:39 PM, Old Pif wrote:<br />
> On Jan 12, <strong>10</strong>:<strong>23</strong> am, &#8220;Jobless&#038;Angry&#8221;
<perryneh ...@hotmail.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>><br />
>> Both the successes and the failures reveal the candidate’s faith in<br />
>> “creative destruction,” the notion that the new must relentlessly<br />
>> replace the old so that companies and the economy can become more<br />
>> efficient.<br />
>><br />
><br />
> &#8220;Creative destruction”  has been practicing by all <strong>US</strong> leaders starting<br />
> from Nixon and Kissinger. The results we observe today. Now we need<br />
> &#8220;Creative construction” for a <strong>change</strong>. If they continue creatively<br />
> destruct the country there will nothing to destruct pretty soon,<br />
> creatively or otherwise.</p>
<p>Socialism is NOT creative anything!</p>
</perryneh>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/12/mitt-romney-touts-creative-destruction-as-best-path-to-jobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keynesian predictions have been spectacularly incorrect</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/12/keynesian-predictions-have-been-spectacularly-incorrect/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/12/keynesian-predictions-have-been-spectacularly-incorrect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 02:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deliberate Deception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAMILY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Krugman Co]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Krugman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QUEEN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RICH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the poor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/12/2012 8:55 PM, Nickname unavailable wrote: > On Jan 11, 4:46 pm, P&#038;*$?%s wrote: >> On 1/11/2012 1:06 PM, Nickname unavailable wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Jan 11, 1:55 pm, P&#038;*$?%s wrote: >>>> On 1/11/2012 9:34 AM, Sid9 wrote: >> >>>>> &#8220;BeamMeUpScotty&#8221; wrote in >>>>> messagenews:4F0DC138.2040100 @&#038;*$?%blackhole.nebulax.com&#8230; >>>>>> On 1/11/2012 11:18 AM, Sid9 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/12/2012 8:55 PM, Nickname unavailable wrote:<br />
> On Jan <strong>11</strong>, 4:46 pm, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym> <n ...@none.com> wrote:<br />
>> On 1/<strong>11</strong>/2012 1:06 PM, Nickname unavailable wrote:<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>> On Jan <strong>11</strong>, 1:55 pm, <acronym title="Peter Franks"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> P&*$?%s</span></acronym></n><n ...@none.com>  wrote:<br />
>>>> On 1/<strong>11</strong>/2012 9:34 AM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>> &#8220;BeamMeUpScotty&#8221;
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com>  wrote in<br />
>>>>> messagenews:4F0DC138.2040100<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>blackhole.nebulax.com&#8230;<br />
>>>>>> On 1/<strong>11</strong>/2012 <strong>11</strong>:18 AM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>> &#8220;BeamMeUpScotty&#8221;</thendestroyeveryth>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com>  wrote in<br />
>>>>>>> messagenews:4F0DB17E.8050207<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>blackhole.nebulax.com&#8230;<br />
>>>>>>>> On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 8:19 PM, Nickname unavailable wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>> On Jan <strong>10</strong>, 1:13 pm, &#8220;Sid9&#8243;<sid9 @ bellsouth.net>  wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>>> &#8220;Werner&#8221;<whetz ...@mac.com>  wrote in message<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>> news:19391644.657.1326221417335.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>vben14&#8230;<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, January <strong>10</strong>, 2012 1:12:15 PM UTC-5, Nickname unavailable<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan <strong>10</strong>, <strong>10</strong>:57 am, Werner<whet ...@mac.com>  wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In the <strong>US</strong> the House writes tax and spend laws. The House has been<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>>> controlled by Dems for most of the past 100 years.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> you have democrats and the word liberal mixed up. there are<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> plenty of<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> crank democrats. since 1981, both parties have been almost<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> identical.<br />
>>>>>>>>>>>> ypu simply cannot lie away 1933-1981.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest people like Sid9 have Democrats and Republican mixed<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> up. Why<br />
>>>>>>>>>>> don&#8217;t you lecture Sid9?<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>> I&#8217;m quite clear about the lassaiz faire Republican economics that<br />
>>>>>>>>>> started<br />
>>>>>>>>>> our country on the road to the instability we had.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>>>>  From the founding of the United States until 1935 America suffered a<br />
>>>>>>>>>> financial crash or collapse on average every 18 years.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>> Until <strong>Progressives</strong> interrupted the natural economic cycle like they say<br />
>>>>>>>> humans interrupted the <strong>Global</strong> Warming cycle today?<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>> Yet they tell us it&#8217;s bad to interfere with the Natural WARMING cycle.<br />
>>>>>>>> They tell us it&#8217;s good to interrupt the Natural economic cycles&#8230;.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>>> This is typical logic of <strong>Progressives</strong> they&#8217;re willing to do what ever<br />
>>>>>>>> they want and destroy what ever NATURAL process they want, Or lie and<br />
>>>>>>>> fake science to tax and write laws as long as it promotes their failed<br />
>>>>>>>> ideology and growing government.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>> .<br />
>>>>>>> .<br />
>>>>>>> .<br />
>>>>>>> Boom and bust&#8230;crashes and financial panics are OK with you?<br />
>>>>>>> The hardships they bring on most people is meaningless to you.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> It gets rid og the weak and creates new opportunities, the rich become<br />
>>>>>> poor and <strong>the poor</strong> are given new opportunities.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>> We know how to keep economic swings under control yet Republicans got<br />
>>>>>>> the whole game backwards.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> NO YOU DON&#8217;T KNOW HOW&#8230; you only think you do. You create a<br />
>>>>>> situation worse than <strong>Global</strong> Warming.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>> Deregulation, started by Republican St Reagan has been a disaster.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> It has been a way to get rid of stupid laws and <strong>regulations</strong> that keep<br />
>>>>>> <strong>the poor</strong> in their place&#8230;. <strong>regulations</strong> put in place by progressives<br />
>>>>>> that got to the top and refuse to let go of the <strong>power</strong>.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>> Tax cuts for the wealthy, or as Republicans call them &#8220;job creators&#8221;<br />
>>>>>>> have brought huge deficits, debt, and failed to produce any jobs.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> Taxing and spending by <strong>Progressives</strong> keeps <strong>the poor</strong> in their rut and<br />
>>>>>> keeps them forever poor&#8230; they are already poo so a bad economy<br />
>>>>>> doesn&#8217;t make <strong>the poor</strong> &#8220;poor&#8221; but the progressives plan to stop the<br />
>>>>>> cycles will keep the rich &#8220;rich&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> They are <strong>North East</strong> USA <strong>Progressives</strong>, they did it by destroying States<br />
>>>>>> Rights and using the Civil War as a phony excuse to kill <strong>States Rights</strong><br />
>>>>>> and amendment <strong>10</strong>, ever since they have tried to get income tax with the<br />
>>>>>> intent to use their new <strong>power</strong> to keep <strong>the poor</strong> where they are and<br />
>>>>>> thereby keep the <strong>RICH</strong> in <strong>power</strong>.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> What was once an economy that recycled society and replaced rich with<br />
>>>>>> poor, was changed by progressives to stagnate the ability of society to<br />
>>>>>> move people through the layers of college Fraternity selected and monied<br />
>>>>>> family top level <strong>North East</strong> <strong>Progressives</strong>.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>>> It makes no sense to keep repeating the Republicans failed policies.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> Failure is what change/repairs society, smoothing out the economy<br />
>>>>>> creates a hierarchy of rich that can&#8217;t be displaced and can NOT be<br />
>>>>>> eventually replaced.<br />
>><br />
>>>>>> The <strong>QUEEN</strong> makes sure the laws/<strong>regulations</strong> keep her <strong>FAMILY</strong> <strong>RICH</strong> and they<br />
>>>>>> make sure <strong>the poor</strong> will continue to be poor. The progressives are all<br />
>>>>>> for stopping progress when it comes to their family getting a bloody<br />
>>>>>> nose and ending up poor.<br />
>><br />
>>>>> &#8220;<strong>States Rights</strong>&#8221; divides America and makes us weak.<br />
>>>>> &#8220;<strong>States Rights</strong>&#8221; is cover for racism that divides and weakens America.<br />
>><br />
>>>>> &#8220;<strong>States Rights</strong>&#8221; is an RRR con job on fools like you who revel in failure.<br />
>><br />
>>>>> Well, Republican delivered&#8230;&#8230;<strong>FAILURE</strong>!.<br />
>><br />
>>>> Perhaps, but no where near the scale of the Democratic delivered<br />
>>>> economic failure triggered by <strong>CRA</strong> and similar socialist programs.<br />
>><br />
>>>   you can back you lies up correct?<br />
>><br />
>> Yep.<br />
>><br />
>> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/1999/09/30/business/fannie-mae-eases-credit-to..." >http://www.nytimes.com/1999/09/30/business/fannie-mae-eases-credit-to&#8230;</a><br />
>><br />
>> 1/business/new-agency-proposed-to-ove&#8230;</a><br />
>><br />
>>> if you can, you will be a rich man.<br />
>><br />
>> Keep your filthy money.  I earn my wages, thank you.<br />
>><br />
>> &lt;1500 pages of <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym> snipped><br />
><br />
>  chirp chirp chirp:)))))<br />
><br />
><br />
><br />
> <a href="http://www.truth-out.org/deliberate-deception-us-blaming-fannie-and-freddie-crisis/1326316248" >http://www.truth-out.org/deliberate-deception-us-blaming-fannie-and-freddie-crisis/1326316248</a><br />
><br />
> <strong>Deliberate Deception</strong> in the <strong>US</strong>: Blaming <strong>Fannie</strong> and Freddie for Crisis<br />
> Thursday 12 January 2012<br />
> by: <strong>Paul Krugman</strong>, Krugman &#038; Co. | Op-Ed</p>
<p>Yet <strong>Fannie</strong> Mae and <strong>Freddie Mac</strong> are $100 billion dollars behind the tax<br />
payers 8 ball.</p>
<p>Nice try but they are at the center of the Mortgage crash, they helped<br />
cause it they aren&#8217;t innocent &#8220;victims&#8221;  that lie is a bridge too far.</p>
<p></whet></whetz></sid9></thendestroyeveryth></n></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/12/keynesian-predictions-have-been-spectacularly-incorrect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I challenge Warren Buffett to pay as much tax as I paid, and I Paid 100% of what I was told to pay.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/12/i-challenge-warren-buffett-to-pay-as-much-tax-as-i-paid-and-i-paid-100-of-what-i-was-told-to-pay/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/12/i-challenge-warren-buffett-to-pay-as-much-tax-as-i-paid-and-i-paid-100-of-what-i-was-told-to-pay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EXECUTIVE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ole Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Thu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REMEMBER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEIU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Buffet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WASHINGTON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZERO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/12/2012 5:25 PM, First. Post wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:20:17 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: > >> On 1/12/2012 3:31 PM, Sid9 wrote: >>> >>> &#8220;BeamMeUpScotty&#8221; wrote in >>> message news:4F0F2D03.3030903 @&#038;*$?%blackhole.nebulax.com&#8230; >>>> On 1/12/2012 12:13 AM, Bret Cahill wrote: >>>>>> WASHINGTON &#8211; U.S. tycoon Warren Buffett has challenged Republicans in >>>>>> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/12/2012 5:25 PM, First. Post wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Thu</strong>, 12 Jan 2012 16:20:17 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> On 1/12/2012 3:31 PM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>> &#8220;BeamMeUpScotty&#8221; </thendestroyeverything>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote in<br />
>>> message news:4F0F2D03.3030903<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>blackhole.nebulax.com&#8230;<br />
>>>> On 1/12/2012 12:13 AM, Bret Cahill wrote:<br />
>>>>>> <strong>WASHINGTON</strong> &#8211; U.S. tycoon Warren Buffett has challenged Republicans in<br />
>>>>>> <strong>Congress</strong> to make personal contributions to cut the <strong>US</strong> deficit,<br />
>>>>>> vowing to<br />
>>>>>> match their donations dollar-for-dollar.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Given the <strong>money</strong> laundering going on in the <strong>Obama Administration</strong>, any<br />
>>>> <strong>money</strong> you send to Washington D.C. will be fed into the <strong>DNC</strong> and <strong>SEIU</strong> and<br />
>>>> <strong>ACORN</strong> and Unions and then back to be used to get Obama re-elected.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Why would Republicans take that bait and help fund Obama with Matching<br />
>>>> dollars.  All the Republicans need to do is set back and wait for Obama<br />
>>>> and his ilk to confiscate that <strong>money</strong> from Warren Buffett.   That has<br />
>>>> been the Socialist plan and voice to date, they plan to tax all of<br />
>>>> Warren Buffett&#8217;s <strong>wealth</strong> from him&#8230;..  without the Republicans help<br />
>>>> &#8220;<strong>REMEMBER</strong>&#8220;.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> If Obama can Act without <strong>Congress</strong> to enact all these plans and<br />
>>>> regulation through signing orders and Executive decree then let Obama<br />
>>>> take all that ill gotten <strong>money</strong> from <strong>Warren Buffet</strong> with Obama&#8217;s <strong>EXECUTIVE</strong><br />
>>>> <strong>POWER</strong> and the Republicans don&#8217;t need to lift a finger.<br />
>>>><br />
>>> .<br />
>>> .<br />
>>> <acronym title="Bitch"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> B&*$?%h</span></acronym> McConnell suggested it.<br />
>>> Buffett took him up on it&#8230;&#8230;<br />
>>> McConnell is worth about $<strong>10</strong> million.<br />
>>> Buffett offered to match it 3 for one for McConnell.<br />
>>> One for one for all the other Republicans&#8230;there&#8217;s almost 300<br />
>>> Republicans in congress&#8230;.<br />
>>> How many will kick in?<br />
>>><br />
>>> My guess?  <strong>ZERO</strong>!<br />
>>><br />
>>> Republicans, like bush,jr, all hat and no cattle.<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> Governing on a dare?<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> Is that what Democrat-Socialists are down to?<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> I dare you to knock that stick off my shoulder&#8230;.<br />
><br />
><br />
> Why doesn&#8217;t Buffet start by paying the millions he owes in back <strong>taxes</strong><br />
> instead of fighting it tooth fang and claw with an army of lawyers if<br />
> he&#8217;s so <acronym title="fucking"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> f&*$?%g</span></acronym> high and mighty?</p>
<p>Good point, excellent catch I forgot about Ole` Warren&#8217;s  attitude<br />
towards paying <strong>taxes</strong>&#8230;.   Let me expand on your most excellent catch&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8220;I challenge Warren Buffett to pay as much tax as I paid, and I Paid<br />
100% of what I was told to pay.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>SO</strong> Warren can pay 100% of what they say that he owes.    That will get<br />
the skids greased won&#8217;t it.</p>
</thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/12/i-challenge-warren-buffett-to-pay-as-much-tax-as-i-paid-and-i-paid-100-of-what-i-was-told-to-pay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;ll even go three for one for McConnell!</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/12/ill-even-go-three-for-one-for-mcconnell-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/12/ill-even-go-three-for-one-for-mcconnell-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EXECUTIVE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REMEMBER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEIU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Buffet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WASHINGTON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZERO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/12/2012 3:31 PM, Sid9 wrote: > > &#8220;BeamMeUpScotty&#8221; wrote in > message news:4F0F2D03.3030903 @&#038;*$?%blackhole.nebulax.com&#8230; >> On 1/12/2012 12:13 AM, Bret Cahill wrote: >>>> WASHINGTON &#8211; U.S. tycoon Warren Buffett has challenged Republicans in >>>> Congress to make personal contributions to cut the US deficit, >>>> vowing to >>>> match their donations dollar-for-dollar. >> >> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/12/2012 3:31 PM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
><br />
> &#8220;BeamMeUpScotty&#8221;
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote in<br />
> message news:4F0F2D03.3030903<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>blackhole.nebulax.com&#8230;<br />
>> On 1/12/2012 12:13 AM, Bret Cahill wrote:<br />
>>>> <strong>WASHINGTON</strong> &#8211; U.S. tycoon Warren Buffett has challenged Republicans in<br />
>>>> <strong>Congress</strong> to make personal contributions to cut the <strong>US</strong> deficit,<br />
>>>> vowing to<br />
>>>> match their donations dollar-for-dollar.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> Given the <strong>money</strong> laundering going on in the <strong>Obama Administration</strong>, any<br />
>> <strong>money</strong> you send to Washington D.C. will be fed into the <strong>DNC</strong> and <strong>SEIU</strong> and<br />
>> <strong>ACORN</strong> and Unions and then back to be used to get Obama re-elected.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> Why would Republicans take that bait and help fund Obama with Matching<br />
>> dollars.  All the Republicans need to do is set back and wait for Obama<br />
>> and his ilk to confiscate that <strong>money</strong> from Warren Buffett.   That has<br />
>> been the Socialist plan and voice to date, they plan to tax all of<br />
>> Warren Buffett&#8217;s <strong>wealth</strong> from him&#8230;..  without the Republicans help<br />
>> &#8220;<strong>REMEMBER</strong>&#8220;.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> If Obama can Act without <strong>Congress</strong> to enact all these plans and<br />
>> regulation through signing orders and Executive decree then let Obama<br />
>> take all that ill gotten <strong>money</strong> from <strong>Warren Buffet</strong> with Obama&#8217;s <strong>EXECUTIVE</strong><br />
>> <strong>POWER</strong> and the Republicans don&#8217;t need to lift a finger.<br />
>><br />
> .<br />
> .<br />
> <acronym title="Bitch"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> B&*$?%h</span></acronym> McConnell suggested it.<br />
> Buffett took him up on it&#8230;&#8230;<br />
> McConnell is worth about $<strong>10</strong> million.<br />
> Buffett offered to match it 3 for one for McConnell.<br />
> One for one for all the other Republicans&#8230;there&#8217;s almost 300<br />
> Republicans in congress&#8230;.<br />
> How many will kick in?<br />
><br />
> My guess?  <strong>ZERO</strong>!<br />
><br />
> Republicans, like bush,jr, all hat and no cattle.<br />
><br />
><br />
></p>
<p>Governing on a dare?</p>
<p>Is that what Democrat-<strong>Socialists</strong> are down to?</p>
<p>I dare you to knock that stick off my shoulder&#8230;.</p>
</thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/12/ill-even-go-three-for-one-for-mcconnell-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Before one dime is cut from the U.S. Military, NATO should be cut to zero.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/12/before-one-dime-is-cut-from-the-u-s-military-nato-should-be-cut-to-zero/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/12/before-one-dime-is-cut-from-the-u-s-military-nato-should-be-cut-to-zero/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OATH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/12/2012 2:21 PM, Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars wrote: > On Jan 10, 1:14 pm, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: >> >> NATO doesn&#8217;t take an OATH to the U.S. Constitution. > > One of its members does and that&#8217;s all that&#8217;s needed. NO&#8230; NATO is NOT part of the U.S. Government it is a treaty and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/12/2012 2:21 PM, <strong>Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars</strong> wrote:<br />
> On Jan <strong>10</strong>, 1:14 pm, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>> <strong>NATO</strong> doesn&#8217;t take an <strong>OATH</strong> to the U.S. <strong>Constitution</strong>.<br />
><br />
> One of its members does and that&#8217;s all that&#8217;s needed.</p>
<p>NO&#8230;  <strong>NATO</strong> is NOT part of the U.S. Government it is a treaty and an<br />
outdated one at that.</p>
<p>It has been corrupted and is NOT beneficial to the people of the <strong>USA</strong> and<br />
is used for unconstitutional wars and circumventing parts of the<br />
constitution which restrict <strong>Federal</strong> and Presidential <strong>power</strong> and that<br />
makes it unconstitutional under <strong>amendment</strong> 9.</p>
<p>The people through the constitution limited the <strong>power</strong> to make and<br />
declare war&#8230;   <strong>NATO</strong> is an end run around that limitation.  It is NO<br />
longer a purely defensive army pact it is NOW an offensive mercenary<br />
<strong>Military</strong> with it&#8217;s own *moral, economic and philosophical* goals.  It is<br />
NOT voted and NO leaders of it are elected by the voters of the <strong>United<br />
States</strong>.  It is past time to eviscerate <strong>NATO</strong>.  Before one dime is cut<br />
from the U.S. <strong>Military</strong>, <strong>NATO</strong> should be cut to zero.</p>
</thendestroyeveryth>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/12/before-one-dime-is-cut-from-the-u-s-military-nato-should-be-cut-to-zero/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s 11% UNEMPLOYMENT RATE compared ot Bush&#8217;s 4.4 %</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/12/obamas-11-unemployment-rate-compared-ot-bushs-4-4-13/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/12/obamas-11-unemployment-rate-compared-ot-bushs-4-4-13/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lamont Cranston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RATE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/11/2012 8:59 PM, Lamont Cranston wrote: > On 1/10/2012 7:57 AM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote: > >> Even Obama laughed at the idea he had shovel ready jobs, there were none >> and he created NO jobs > > The CBO and almost every economist in the country says that you a > f&#038;*$?%g liar. And [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>11</strong>/2012 8:59 PM, <strong>Lamont Cranston</strong> wrote:<br />
> On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 7:57 AM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:<br />
><br />
>> Even Obama laughed at the idea he had shovel ready jobs, there were none<br />
>> and he created NO jobs<br />
><br />
> The <strong>CBO</strong> and almost every economist in the country says that you a<br />
> <acronym title="fucking"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> f&*$?%g</span></acronym> liar.</p>
<p>And then Obama said that &#8220;there are no shovel ready jobs&#8221; and all those<br />
people he had coerced into saying there were jobs, suddenly look like<br />
the lying fools.</p>
<p>The <strong>CBO</strong> was compromised when the head of the <strong>CBO</strong> head accepted Obama&#8217;s<br />
request for a face to face meeting&#8230;.</p>
<p>The rest will lie for no special reasons.  They all ended up looking<br />
like shills for Obama and made out to be liars.</p>
<p>> <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2011/09/12/perry-says-stimulus-didnt-create-jobs-cbo-says-it-did/" >http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2011/09/12/perry-says-stimulus-didnt-create-jobs-cbo-says-it-did/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/12/obamas-11-unemployment-rate-compared-ot-bushs-4-4-13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The High Cost of Poverty &#8211; Why the Poor Pay More</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/12/the-high-cost-of-poverty-why-the-poor-pay-more/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/12/the-high-cost-of-poverty-why-the-poor-pay-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[37]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADVANCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Census Bureau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harrison Blakeney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manor Park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nya Oti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAYDAY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Randy Albelda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subprime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the poor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/11/2012 5:59 PM, sarge wrote: > On 10 Jan, 21:27, &#8220; R&#038;*$?%d&#8221; wrote: >> Immortalist wrote: >>> You have to be rich to be poor. >> >> Mindlessly silly. >> >>> That&#8217;s what some people who have never lived >>> below the poverty line don&#8217;t understand. >> >> Nothing to &#8216;understand&#8217; >> >>> Put [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>11</strong>/2012 5:59 PM, sarge wrote:<br />
> On <strong>10</strong> Jan, 21:27, &#8220;<acronym title="Rod Speed"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> R&*$?%d</span></acronym>&#8221; <rod .speed....@gmail.com> wrote:<br />
>> Immortalist wrote:<br />
>>> You have to be rich to be poor.<br />
>><br />
>> Mindlessly silly.<br />
>><br />
>>> That&#8217;s what some people who have never lived<br />
>>> below the poverty line don&#8217;t understand.<br />
>><br />
>> Nothing to &#8216;understand&#8217;<br />
>><br />
>>> Put it another way: The poorer you are, the more things cost.<br />
>><br />
>> Even sillier. If you are poor enough to qualify for food stamps,<br />
>> they dont cost you a damned thing except your time.<br />
>><br />
>>> More in <strong>money</strong>,<br />
>><br />
>> Nope.<br />
>><br />
>>> time, hassle,<br />
>><br />
>> But not as much as a full time job requires.<br />
>><br />
>>> exhaustion, menace.<br />
>><br />
>> Even sillier.<br />
>><br />
>>> This is a fact of life that reality television and magazines don&#8217;t often explain.<br />
>><br />
>> Its nothing like a reality, just your completely mindless silly wank.<br />
>><br />
>>> So we&#8217;ll explain it here. Consider this a primer on the economics of poverty.<br />
>><br />
>> No thanks, its obviously just your mindless sily wank/attention seeking behaviour.<br />
>><br />
>>> &#8220;The poor pay more for a gallon of milk; they pay more on a capital<br />
>>> basis for inferior housing,&#8221; says Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.).<br />
>><br />
>> Then earl is a fool.<br />
>><br />
>>> &#8220;The poor and 100 million who are struggling for the middle<br />
>>> class actually end up paying more for transportation,<br />
>><br />
>> Mindlessly silly when they drive wrecks instead of new cars.<br />
>><br />
>>> for housing,<br />
>><br />
>> Mindlessly silly when they get govt housing.<br />
>><br />
>>> for health care,<br />
>><br />
>> Mindlessly silly when they get free health care that others have to pay for.<br />
>><br />
>>> for <strong>mortgages</strong>.<br />
>><br />
>> The real poor dont have <strong>mortgages</strong>, fool.<br />
>><br />
>>> They get steered to <strong>subprime</strong> lending. . . .<br />
>><br />
>> The real poor dont have <strong>mortgages</strong>, fool.<br />
>><br />
>>> The poor pay more for things middle-class America takes for granted.&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>> The real poor get food stamps, fool.<br />
>><br />
>>> Poverty 101: We&#8217;ll start with the basics.<br />
>><br />
>> And spew lie after lie after lie.<br />
>><br />
>>> Like food: You don&#8217;t have a car to get to a supermarket,<br />
>><br />
>> So you get off your lard arse and walk fool.<br />
>><br />
>> Or do what most of <strong>the poor</strong> do, drive some wreck<br />
>> that costs peanuts instead of a new car, fool.<br />
>><br />
>>> much less to Costco or Trader Joe&#8217;s, where the middle class goes to save <strong>money</strong>.<br />
>><br />
>> But qualify for food stamps and the middle class dont, fool.<br />
>><br />
>>> You don&#8217;t have three hours to take the bus.<br />
>><br />
>> Doesnt take 3 hours to get from where the real<br />
>> poor &#8216;live&#8217; to the nearest supermarket, fool.<br />
>><br />
>>> So you buy groceries at the corner store, where a gallon of milk costs an extra dollar.<br />
>><br />
>> Or you use your food stamps and that doesnt cost you a cent, fool.<br />
>><br />
>> None of the rest of this even sillier <acronym title="shit"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> s&*$?%t</span></acronym> worth bothering with.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>> A loaf of bread there costs you $2.99 for white. For wheat, it&#8217;s<br />
>>> $3.79. The clerk behind the counter tells you the gallon of leaking<br />
>>> milk in the bottom of the back cooler is $4.99. She holds up four<br />
>>> fingers to clarify. The milk is beneath the shelf that holds beef<br />
>>> bologna for $3.79. A pound of butter sells for $4.49. In the back of<br />
>>> the store are fruits and vegetables. The green peppers are shriveled,<br />
>>> the bananas are more brown than yellow, the oranges are picked over.<br />
>><br />
>>> (At a Safeway on Bradley Boulevard in Bethesda, the wheat bread costs<br />
>>> $1.19, and white bread is on sale for $1. A gallon of milk costs $3.49<br />
>>> &#8212; $2.99 if you buy two gallons. A pound of butter is $2.49. Beef<br />
>>> bologna is on sale, two packages for $5.)<br />
>><br />
>>> Prices in urban corner stores are almost always higher, economists<br />
>>> say. And sometimes, prices in supermarkets in poorer neighborhoods are<br />
>>> higher. Many of these stores charge more because the cost of doing<br />
>>> business in some neighborhoods is higher. &#8220;First, they are probably<br />
>>> paying more on goods because they don&#8217;t get the low wholesale price<br />
>>> that bigger stores get,&#8221; says Bradley R. Schiller, a professor<br />
>>> emeritus at <strong>American University</strong> and the author of &#8220;The Economics of<br />
>>> Poverty and Discrimination.&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>>> &#8220;The real estate is higher. The fact that volume is low means fewer<br />
>>> sales per worker. They make fewer dollars of revenue per square foot<br />
>>> of space. They don&#8217;t end up making more <strong>money</strong>. Every corner grocery<br />
>>> store wishes they had profits their customers think they have.&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>>> According to the <strong>Census Bureau</strong>, more than <strong>37</strong> million people in the<br />
>>> country live below the poverty line. The poor know these facts of<br />
>>> life. These facts become their lives.<br />
>><br />
>>> Time is <strong>money</strong>, they say, and <strong>the poor</strong> pay more in time, too.<br />
>><br />
>>> When you are poor, you don&#8217;t have the luxury of throwing a load into<br />
>>> the washing machine and then taking your morning jog while it cycles.<br />
>>> You wait until Monday afternoon, when the laundromat is most likely to<br />
>>> be empty, and you put all of that laundry from four kids into four<br />
>>> heaps, bundle it in sheets, load a cart and drag it to the corner.<br />
>><br />
>>> &#8220;If I had my choice, I would have a washer and a dryer,&#8221; says <strong>Nya Oti</strong>,<br />
>>> <strong>37</strong>, a food-service worker who lives in Brightwood. She stands on her<br />
>>> toes to reach the top of a washer in the laundromat on <strong>Georgia</strong> Avenue<br />
>>> <strong>NW</strong> and pours in detergent. The four loads of laundry will take her<br />
>>> about two hours. A soap opera is playing loudly on the television<br />
>>> hanging from the ceiling. A man comes in talking to himself. He drags<br />
>>> his loads of dirty sheets and mattress pads and dumps them one by one<br />
>>> into the machines next to Oti.<br />
>><br />
>>> She does not seem to notice. She is talking about other costs of<br />
>>> poverty. &#8220;My car broke down this weekend, and it took a lot of time<br />
>>> getting on the bus, standing on the bus stop. It was a waste of a<br />
>>> whole lot of times. Waiting. The transfer to the different bus.&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>>> When she has her car, she drives to Maryland, where she shops for her<br />
>>> groceries at Shoppers Food Warehouse or Save-A-Lot, where she says<br />
>>> some items are cheaper and some are higher. &#8220;They have a way of<br />
>>> getting you in there on a bargain. You go in for something cheap, but<br />
>>> something else is more expensive.&#8221; She buys bags of oranges or apples,<br />
>>> but not the organic kind. &#8220;Organic is too much,&#8221; she says.<br />
>><br />
>>> &#8220;When you are poor, you substitute time for <strong>money</strong>,&#8221; says Randy<br />
>>> Albelda, an economics professor at the University of Massachusetts at<br />
>>> Boston. &#8220;You have to work a lot of hours and still not make a lot of<br />
>>> <strong>money</strong>. You get squeezed, and your <strong>money</strong> is squeezed.&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>>> The poor pay more in hassle: the calls from the bill collectors, the<br />
>>> landlord, the utility company. So they spend <strong>money</strong> to avoid the<br />
>>> hassle. The poor pay for caller identification because it gives them<br />
>>> peace of mind to weed out calls from bill collectors.<br />
>><br />
>>> The rich have direct deposit for their paychecks. The poor have check-<br />
>>> cashing and payday loan joints, which cost time and <strong>money</strong>. Payday<br />
>>> advance companies say they are providing an essential service to<br />
>>> people who most need them. Their critics say they are preying on<br />
>>> people who are the most &#8220;economically vulnerable.&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>>> &#8220;As you&#8217;ve seen with the financial services industry, if people can<br />
>>> cut a profit, they do it,&#8221; Blumenauer says. &#8220;The poor pay more for<br />
>>> financial services. A lot of people who are &#8216;unbanked&#8217; pay $3 for a<br />
>>> <strong>money</strong> order to pay their electric bill. They pay a 2 percent check-<br />
>>> cashing fee because they don&#8217;t have bank services. The reasons? Part<br />
>>> of it is lack of education. But part of it is because people target<br />
>>> them. There is evidence that credit-card mills have recently started<br />
>>> trolling for <strong>the poor</strong>. They are targeting the recently bankrupt.&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>>> Outside the <strong>ACE</strong> check-cashing office on <strong>Georgia</strong> Avenue in Petworth,<br />
>>> <strong>Harrison Blakeney</strong>, 67, explains a hard financial lesson of poverty. He<br />
>>> uses the check-cashing store to pay his telephone bill. The store<br />
>>> charges <strong>10</strong> percent to take Blakeney&#8217;s <strong>money</strong> and send the payment to<br />
>>> the phone company. That <strong>10</strong> percent becomes what it costs him to get<br />
>>> his payment to the telephone company on time. Ten percent is more than<br />
>>> the cost of a stamp. But, Blakeney says: &#8220;I don&#8217;t have time to mail<br />
>>> it. You come here and get it done. Then you don&#8217;t get charged with the<br />
>>> late fee.&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>>> Blakeney, a retired auto mechanic who now lives on a fixed income,<br />
>>> says: &#8220;We could send the payment ahead of time but sometimes you don&#8217;t<br />
>>> have <strong>money</strong> ahead of time. That&#8217;s why you pay extra <strong>money</strong> to get them<br />
>>> to send it.&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>>> Blakeney, wearing a purple jacket, leans on his cane. He has no<br />
>>> criticism for the check-cashing place. &#8220;That&#8217;s how they make their<br />
>>> <strong>money</strong>,&#8221; he says. &#8220;I don&#8217;t care about the charge.&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>>> Just then, Lenwood Brooks walks out of the check-cashing place. He is<br />
>>> angry about how much it just cost him to cash a check. &#8220;They charged<br />
>>> me $15 to cash a $300 check,&#8221; he says.<br />
>><br />
>>> You ask him why he didn&#8217;t just go to a bank. But his story is as<br />
>>> complicated as the various reasons people find themselves in poverty<br />
>>> and in need of a check-cashing joint. He says he lost his driver&#8217;s<br />
>>> license and now his regular bank &#8220;won&#8217;t recognize me as a human.<br />
>>> That&#8217;s why I had to come here. It&#8217;s a rip-off, but it&#8217;s like a<br />
>>> convenience store. You pay for the convenience.&#8221;<br />
>><br />
>>> Then there&#8217;s credit. The poor don&#8217;t have it. What they had was a place<br />
>>> like First Cash Advance in D.C.&#8217;s <strong>Manor Park</strong> neighborhood, where a<br />
>>> neon sign once flashed &#8220;<strong>PAYDAY</strong> <strong>ADVANCE</strong>.&#8221; Through the bulletproof<br />
>>> glass, a cashier in white eyeliner and long white nails explained what<br />
>>> you needed to get an advance on your paycheck &#8212; a pay stub, a<br />
>>> legitimate <strong>ID</strong>, a checkbook. This meant you&#8217;re doing well enough to<br />
>>> have a checking account, but you&#8217;re still poor.<br />
>><br />
>>> And if you qualify, the fee for borrowing $300 is $46.50.<br />
>><br />
>>> That was not for a year &#8212; it&#8217;s for seven days, although the terms can<br />
>>> vary. How much interest will this payday loan cost you? In simple<br />
>>> terms, the company is charging a $15.50 fee for every $100 that you<br />
>>> borrow. On your $300 payday loan &#8212; borrowed for a term of seven days<br />
>>> &#8212; the effective annual percentage rate is 806 percent.<br />
>><br />
>>> The cashier says that what you do is write First Cash Advance a check<br />
>>> for $345.50 plus another $1 fee, and it will give you $300 in cash<br />
>>> upfront. It<br />
>><br />
>> &#8230;<br />
>><br />
>> läs mer »<br />
><br />
> It&#8217;s funny how magical you think food stamps are.  Like this remotely<br />
> brings <strong>the poor</strong>, even the working poor near to the middle class.</p>
<p>Yet these programs cost the taxpayers most of the budget.</p>
<p></rod></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/12/the-high-cost-of-poverty-why-the-poor-pay-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;ve dropped my endorsement of Newt because of accusing Mitt of being a corporate raider when in fact Mitt is a renovator of failed and corrupt companies</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/11/ive-dropped-my-endorsement-of-newt-because-of-accusing-mitt-of-being-a-corporate-raider-when-in-fact-mitt-is-a-renovator-of-failed-and-corrupt-companies-3/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/11/ive-dropped-my-endorsement-of-newt-because-of-accusing-mitt-of-being-a-corporate-raider-when-in-fact-mitt-is-a-renovator-of-failed-and-corrupt-companies-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoorghis Jurgis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/11/2012 5:58 PM, Yoorghis @&#038;*$?%Jurgis.net wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:03:13 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: > >> On 1/10/2012 3:24 PM, Phlip wrote: >>>> America is a Capitalist nation, right? >>> >>> The sacred holy Constitution did not specify which economic system we >>> were to use. >> >> >> Actually it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>11</strong>/2012 5:58 PM, <a href="mailto:Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net">Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
> On Wed, <strong>11</strong> Jan 2012 15:03:13 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 3:24 PM, Phlip wrote:<br />
>>>> America is a <strong>Capitalist</strong> nation, right?<br />
>>><br />
>>> The sacred holy <strong>Constitution</strong> did not specify which economic <strong>system</strong> we<br />
>>> were to use.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> Actually it excludes <strong>Socialism</strong> by default.<br />
><br />
> That&#8217;s because there was economic theory of the time applied.  Same<br />
> goes for why America was &#8220;christian&#8221;&#8212;the exploreres and colonists<br />
> came from Europe.<br />
><br />
>> The only way to create <strong>Socialism</strong> is to use the courts to corrupt the<br />
>> constitution as you are presently attempting, I doubt you&#8217;ll be<br />
>> successful, I suspect judges and politicians will start to hide and stop<br />
>> corrupting the constitution as it will become a life and death decision<br />
>> in the <strong>future</strong>.<br />
><br />
> By &#8220;Corrupting the constittution&#8221;&#8211;you really mean adverse to your<br />
> views.</p>
<p>There is NOT a view when it comes to what is written in the<br />
constitution, You may have a view&#8230;.</p>
<p>*I read and comprehend it* .</p>
<p>Where you have views is when Judges ad <strong>text</strong> to the constitution and laws<br />
without the new <strong>text</strong> being voted in congress or signed by the President<br />
or amendments being ratified.</p>
<p>At that point you have unconstitutional behavior that will have to be<br />
stopped since the perpetrators will not voluntarily end their<br />
destruction and circumvention of the document.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t base your laws on what is written in the constitution then<br />
it really isn&#8217;t the <strong>United States</strong> of America is it.   Because it is the<br />
<strong>Constitution</strong> that created the <strong>United States</strong>, when you stray from that<br />
constitution you create something else that is NOT the <strong>United States</strong>.</p>
<p>[&#8220;We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created<br />
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable<br />
Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of<br />
Happiness.&#8211;That to <strong>secure</strong> these rights, Governments are instituted<br />
among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,</p>
</thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/11/ive-dropped-my-endorsement-of-newt-because-of-accusing-mitt-of-being-a-corporate-raider-when-in-fact-mitt-is-a-renovator-of-failed-and-corrupt-companies-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;ve dropped my endorsement of Newt because of accusing Mitt of being a corporate raider when in fact Mitt is a renovator of failed and corrupt companies</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/11/ive-dropped-my-endorsement-of-newt-because-of-accusing-mitt-of-being-a-corporate-raider-when-in-fact-mitt-is-a-renovator-of-failed-and-corrupt-companies-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/11/ive-dropped-my-endorsement-of-newt-because-of-accusing-mitt-of-being-a-corporate-raider-when-in-fact-mitt-is-a-renovator-of-failed-and-corrupt-companies-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 22:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Days Sundays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Every Order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOVERNMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[increased]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Tribes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neither House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Legislatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vice President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Word Thirty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/11/2012 3:08 PM, Phlip wrote: > On Jan 11, 12:03 pm, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: >> On 1/10/2012 3:24 PM, Phlip wrote: >> >>>> America is a Capitalist nation, right? >> >>> The sacred holy Constitution did not specify which economic system we >>> were to use. >> >> Actually it excludes Socialism by default. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>11</strong>/2012 3:08 PM, Phlip wrote:<br />
> On Jan <strong>11</strong>, 12:03 pm, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeveryth ...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>> On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 3:24 PM, Phlip wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>> America is a Capitalist nation, right?<br />
>><br />
>>> The sacred holy <strong>Constitution</strong> did not specify which economic system we<br />
>>> were to use.<br />
>><br />
>> Actually it excludes <strong>Socialism</strong> by default.   The <strong>Constitution</strong> says we<br />
>> have Individual Rights and you can&#8217;t implement <strong>Socialism</strong> without<br />
>> violating those individual Rights like Property Rights and Rights to be<br />
>> secure in our homes and person and papers&#8230;.. and so on.<br />
><br />
> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>shall</strong> &#8230; raise taxes &#8230; to provide for the common welfare.<br />
> Black letter law, fool.</p>
<p>That is slimy&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>I know it by heart so you can&#8217;t lie to me.</p>
<p>["The <strong>Congress</strong> *<strong>shall</strong> have Power* To lay and collect Taxes, Duties,<br />
Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts"]</p>
<p>&#8230;having power does not infer that it must be used.</p>
<p>You can say that &#8220;to pay debts&#8221;  is &#8220;the Nations&#8221; debts, but then you<br />
have to have congress pay all the States debts and My debts and your<br />
debts and everyone&#8217;s debts.</p>
<p>But if  [", to pay the Debts... and general Welfare of the <strong>United States</strong>; "]</p>
<p>Means pay the debts and the general welfare of the<br />
*Federal Government* , then you need not pay all the debts and welfare<br />
for the States and me and you and everyone.</p>
<p>And the words &#8220;to pay the debts&#8221;  does infer that it is a command or<br />
order or imperative and NOT a choice.   The congress will pay the debts<br />
the only question is who&#8217;s debts and &#8220;<strong>United States</strong>&#8221; is the qualifier in<br />
that sentence of who&#8217;s debt will be paid.</p>
<p>So does &#8220;the <strong>United States</strong>&#8221; mean an ambiguous *NATION* or does it mean<br />
*<strong>FEDERAL</strong> <strong>GOVERNMENT</strong>* ?</p>
<p>Here&#8230;  I did a find and replace of *<strong>United States</strong>*<br />
to *Federal Government*</p>
<p>Article. I.<br />
Section. 1.</p>
<p>All legislative Powers herein granted <strong>shall</strong> be vested in a <strong>Congress</strong> of<br />
the *Federal Government*, which <strong>shall</strong> consist of a Senate and House of<br />
Representatives.<br />
Section. 2.</p>
<p>The House of Representatives <strong>shall</strong> be composed of Members chosen every<br />
second Year by the People of the several States, and the Electors in<br />
each State <strong>shall</strong> have the Qualifications requisite for Electors of the<br />
most numerous Branch of the State Legislature.</p>
<p>No Person <strong>shall</strong> be a Representative who <strong>shall</strong> not have attained to the<br />
Age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the<br />
*Federal Government*, and who <strong>shall</strong> not, when elected, be an Inhabitant<br />
of that State in which he <strong>shall</strong> be chosen.</p>
<p>Representatives and direct Taxes <strong>shall</strong> be apportioned among the several<br />
States which may be included within this <strong>Union</strong>, according to their<br />
respective Numbers, which <strong>shall</strong> be determined by adding to the whole<br />
Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of<br />
Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other<br />
Persons. The actual Enumeration <strong>shall</strong> be made within three Years after<br />
the first Meeting of the <strong>Congress</strong> of the *Federal Government*, and<br />
within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they <strong>shall</strong><br />
by Law direct. The Number of Representatives <strong>shall</strong> not exceed one for<br />
every thirty Thousand, but each State <strong>shall</strong> have at Least one<br />
Representative; and until such enumeration <strong>shall</strong> be made, the State of<br />
New Hampshire <strong>shall</strong> be entitled to chuse three, Massachusetts eight,<br />
Rhode-Island? and Providence Plantations one, Connecticut five,<br />
New-York? six, New Jersey four, Pennsylvania eight, Delaware one,<br />
Maryland six, Virginia ten, North Carolina five, South Carolina five,<br />
and Georgia three.</p>
<p>When vacancies happen in the Representation from any State, the<br />
Executive Authority thereof <strong>shall</strong> issue Writs of Election to fill such<br />
Vacancies.</p>
<p>The House of Representatives <strong>shall</strong> chuse their Speaker and other<br />
Officers; and <strong>shall</strong> have the sole Power of Impeachment.<br />
Section. 3.</p>
<p>The Senate of the *Federal Government* <strong>shall</strong> be composed of two Senators<br />
from each State, chosen by the Legislature thereof for six Years; and<br />
each Senator <strong>shall</strong> have one Vote.</p>
<p>Immediately after they <strong>shall</strong> be assembled in Consequence of the first<br />
Election, they <strong>shall</strong> be divided as equally as may be into three Classes.<br />
The Seats of the Senators of the first Class <strong>shall</strong> be vacated at the<br />
Expiration of the second Year, of the second Class at the Expiration of<br />
the fourth Year, and of the third Class at the Expiration of the sixth<br />
Year, so that one third may be chosen every second Year; and if<br />
Vacancies happen by Resignation, or otherwise, during the Recess of the<br />
Legislature of any State, the Executive thereof may make temporary<br />
Appointments until the next Meeting of the Legislature, which <strong>shall</strong> then<br />
fill such Vacancies.</p>
<p>No Person <strong>shall</strong> be a Senator who <strong>shall</strong> not have attained to the Age of<br />
thirty Years, and been nine Years a Citizen of the<br />
*Federal Government*, and who <strong>shall</strong> not, when elected, be an Inhabitant<br />
of that State for which he <strong>shall</strong> be chosen.</p>
<p>The <strong>Vice President</strong> of the *Federal Government* <strong>shall</strong> be President of the<br />
Senate, but <strong>shall</strong> have no Vote, unless they be equally divided.</p>
<p>The Senate <strong>shall</strong> chuse their other Officers, and also a President pro<br />
tempore, in the Absence of the <strong>Vice President</strong>, or when he <strong>shall</strong> exercise<br />
the <strong>Office</strong> of President of the *Federal Government*.</p>
<p>The Senate <strong>shall</strong> have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When<br />
sitting for that Purpose, they <strong>shall</strong> be on Oath or Affirmation. When the<br />
President of the *Federal Government* is tried, the Chief Justice <strong>shall</strong><br />
preside: And no Person <strong>shall</strong> be convicted without the Concurrence of two<br />
thirds of the Members present.</p>
<p>Judgment in Cases of Impeachment <strong>shall</strong> not extend further than to<br />
removal from <strong>Office</strong>, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any <strong>Office</strong><br />
of honor, Trust or Profit under the *Federal Government*: but the Party<br />
convicted <strong>shall</strong> nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial,<br />
Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.<br />
Section. 4.</p>
<p>The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and<br />
Representatives, <strong>shall</strong> be prescribed in each State by the Legislature<br />
thereof; but the <strong>Congress</strong> may at any time by Law make or alter such<br />
Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.</p>
<p>The <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>shall</strong> assemble at least once in every Year, and such<br />
Meeting <strong>shall</strong> be on the first Monday in December, unless they <strong>shall</strong> by<br />
Law appoint a different Day.<br />
Section. 5.</p>
<p>Each House <strong>shall</strong> be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and<br />
Qualifications of its own Members, and a Majority of each <strong>shall</strong><br />
constitute a Quorum to do Business; but a smaller Number may adjourn<br />
from day to day, and may be authorized to compel the Attendance of<br />
absent Members, in such Manner, and under such Penalties as each House<br />
may provide.</p>
<p>Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its<br />
Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two<br />
thirds, expel a Member.</p>
<p>Each House <strong>shall</strong> keep a Journal of its Proceedings, and from time to<br />
time publish the same, excepting such Parts as may in their Judgment<br />
require Secrecy; and the Yeas and Nays of the Members of either House on<br />
any question <strong>shall</strong>, at the Desire of one fifth of those Present, be<br />
entered on the Journal.</p>
<p><strong>Neither House</strong>, during the Session of <strong>Congress</strong>, <strong>shall</strong>, without the<br />
Consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days, nor to any other<br />
Place than that in which the two Houses <strong>shall</strong> be sitting.<br />
Section. 6.</p>
<p>The Senators and Representatives <strong>shall</strong> receive a Compensation for their<br />
Services, to be ascertained by Law, and paid out of the Treasury of the<br />
*Federal Government*. They <strong>shall</strong> in all Cases, except Treason, Felony<br />
and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their<br />
Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to<br />
and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either<br />
House, they <strong>shall</strong> not be questioned in any other Place.</p>
<p>No Senator or Representative <strong>shall</strong>, during the Time for which he was<br />
elected, be appointed to any civil <strong>Office</strong> under the Authority of the<br />
*Federal Government*, which <strong>shall</strong> have been created, or the Emoluments<br />
whereof <strong>shall</strong> have been <strong>increased</strong> during such time; and no Person<br />
holding any <strong>Office</strong> under the *Federal Government*, <strong>shall</strong> be a Member of<br />
either House during his Continuance in <strong>Office</strong>.<br />
Section. 7.</p>
<p>All Bills for raising Revenue <strong>shall</strong> originate in the House of<br />
Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as<br />
on other Bills.</p>
<p>Every Bill which <strong>shall</strong> have passed the House of Representatives and the<br />
Senate, <strong>shall</strong>, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of<br />
the *Federal Government*: If he approve he <strong>shall</strong> sign it, but if not he<br />
<strong>shall</strong> return it, with his Objections to that House in which it <strong>shall</strong><br />
have originated, who <strong>shall</strong> enter the Objections at large on their<br />
Journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If after such Reconsideration two<br />
thirds of that House <strong>shall</strong> agree to pass the Bill, it <strong>shall</strong> be sent,<br />
together with the Objections, to the other House, by which it <strong>shall</strong><br />
likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two thirds of that House,<br />
it <strong>shall</strong> become a Law. But in all such Cases the Votes of both Houses<br />
<strong>shall</strong> be determined by yeas and Nays, and the Names of the Persons<br />
voting for and against the Bill <strong>shall</strong> be entered on the Journal of each<br />
House respectively. If any Bill <strong>shall</strong> not be returned by the President<br />
within ten Days (Sundays excepted) after it <strong>shall</strong> have been presented to<br />
him, the Same <strong>shall</strong> be a Law, in like Manner as if he had signed it,<br />
unless the <strong>Congress</strong> by their Adjournment prevent its Return, in which<br />
Case it <strong>shall</strong> not be a Law.</p>
<p><strong>Every Order</strong>, Resolution, or Vote to which the Concurrence of the Senate<br />
and House of Representatives may be necessary (except on a question of<br />
Adjournment) <strong>shall</strong> be presented to the President of the *Federal<br />
Government*; and before the Same <strong>shall</strong> take Effect, <strong>shall</strong> be approved by<br />
him, or being disapproved by him, <strong>shall</strong> be repassed by two thirds of the<br />
Senate and House of Representatives, according to the Rules and<br />
Limitations prescribed in the Case of a Bill.<br />
Section. 8.</p>
<p>The <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>shall</strong> have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts<br />
and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and<br />
general Welfare of the *Federal Government*; but all Duties, Imposts and<br />
Excises <strong>shall</strong> be uniform throughout the *Federal Government*;</p>
<p>To borrow Money on the credit of the *Federal Government*;</p>
<p>To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several<br />
States, and with the <strong>Indian Tribes</strong>;</p>
<p>To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on<br />
the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the *Federal Government*;</p>
<p>To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and<br />
fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;</p>
<p>To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and<br />
current Coin of the *Federal Government*;</p>
<p>To establish Post Offices and post Roads;</p>
<p>To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for<br />
limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their<br />
respective Writings and Discoveries;</p>
<p>To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;</p>
<p>To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high<br />
Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;</p>
<p>To declare <strong>War</strong>, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules<br />
concerning Captures on Land and Water;</p>
<p>To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that<br />
Use <strong>shall</strong> be for a longer Term than two Years;</p>
<p>To provide and maintain a Navy;</p>
<p>To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and<br />
naval Forces;</p>
<p>To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the<br />
<strong>Union</strong>, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;</p>
<p>To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia,<br />
and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of<br />
the *Federal Government*, reserving to the States respectively, the<br />
Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia<br />
according to the discipline prescribed by <strong>Congress</strong>;</p>
<p>To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such<br />
District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of<br />
particular States, and the Acceptance of <strong>Congress</strong>, become the Seat of<br />
the Government of the *Federal Government*, and to exercise like<br />
Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of<br />
the State in which the Same <strong>shall</strong> be, for the Erection of Forts,<br />
Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;&#8211;And</p>
<p>To make all Laws which <strong>shall</strong> be necessary and proper for carrying<br />
into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this<br />
<strong>Constitution</strong> in the Government of the *Federal Government*, or in any<br />
Department or Officer thereof.</p>
<p>Section. 9.</p>
<p>The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now<br />
existing <strong>shall</strong> think proper to admit, <strong>shall</strong> not be prohibited by the<br />
<strong>Congress</strong> prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a<br />
Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten<br />
dollars for each Person.</p>
<p>The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus <strong>shall</strong> not be suspended,<br />
unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may<br />
require it.</p>
<p>No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law <strong>shall</strong> be passed.</p>
<p>No Capitation, or other direct, Tax <strong>shall</strong> be laid, unless in Proportion<br />
to the Census or enumeration herein before directed to be taken.</p>
<p>No Tax or Duty <strong>shall</strong> be laid on Articles exported from any State.</p>
<p>No Preference <strong>shall</strong> be given by any Regulation of Commerce or Revenue to<br />
the Ports of one State over those of another; nor <strong>shall</strong> Vessels bound<br />
to, or from, one State, be obliged to enter, clear, or pay Duties in<br />
another.</p>
<p>No Money <strong>shall</strong> be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of<br />
Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the<br />
Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money <strong>shall</strong> be published from<br />
time to time.</p>
<p>No Title of Nobility <strong>shall</strong> be granted by the *Federal Government*: And<br />
no Person holding any <strong>Office</strong> of Profit or Trust under them, <strong>shall</strong>,<br />
without the Consent of the <strong>Congress</strong>, accept of any present, Emolument,<br />
<strong>Office</strong>, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or<br />
foreign State.<br />
Section. <strong>10</strong>.</p>
<p>No State <strong>shall</strong> enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant<br />
Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make<br />
any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass<br />
any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the<br />
Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.</p>
<p>No State <strong>shall</strong>, without the Consent of the <strong>Congress</strong>, lay any Imposts or<br />
Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary<br />
for executing it&#8217;s inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties<br />
and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, <strong>shall</strong> be for the<br />
Use of the Treasury of the *Federal Government*; and all such Laws <strong>shall</strong><br />
be subject to the Revision and Controul of the <strong>Congress</strong>.</p>
<p>No State <strong>shall</strong>, without the Consent of <strong>Congress</strong>, lay any Duty of<br />
Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of <strong>War</strong> in time of Peace, enter into any<br />
Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or<br />
engage in <strong>War</strong>, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as<br />
will not admit of delay.<br />
Article. II.<br />
Section. 1.</p>
<p>The executive Power <strong>shall</strong> be vested in a President of the<br />
*Federal Government* of America. He <strong>shall</strong> hold his <strong>Office</strong> during the<br />
Term of four Years, and, together with the <strong>Vice President</strong>, chosen for<br />
the same Term, be elected, as follows:</p>
<p>Each State <strong>shall</strong> appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may<br />
direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and<br />
Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the <strong>Congress</strong>: but<br />
no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an <strong>Office</strong> of Trust or<br />
Profit under the *Federal Government*, <strong>shall</strong> be appointed an Elector.</p>
<p>The Electors <strong>shall</strong> meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot<br />
for two Persons, of whom one at least <strong>shall</strong> not be an Inhabitant of the<br />
same State with themselves. And they <strong>shall</strong> make a List of all the<br />
Persons voted for, and of the Number of Votes for each; which List they<br />
<strong>shall</strong> sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the Seat of the<br />
Government of the *Federal Government*, directed to the President of the<br />
Senate. The President of the Senate <strong>shall</strong>, in the Presence of the Senate<br />
and House of Representatives, open all the Certificates, and the Votes<br />
<strong>shall</strong> then be counted. The Person having the greatest Number of Votes<br />
<strong>shall</strong> be the President, if such Number be a Majority of the whole Number<br />
of Electors appointed; and if there be more than one who have such<br />
Majority, and have an equal Number of Votes, then the House of<br />
Representatives <strong>shall</strong> immediately chuse by Ballot one of them for<br />
President; and if no Person have a Majority, then from the five highest<br />
on the List the said House <strong>shall</strong> in like Manner chuse the President. But<br />
in chusing the President, the Votes <strong>shall</strong> be taken by States, the<br />
Representation from each State having one Vote; A quorum for this<br />
purpose <strong>shall</strong> consist of a Member or Members from two thirds of the<br />
States, and a Majority of all the States <strong>shall</strong> be necessary to a Choice.<br />
In every Case, after the Choice of the President, the Person having the<br />
greatest Number of Votes of the Electors <strong>shall</strong> be the <strong>Vice President</strong>.<br />
But if there should remain two or more who have equal Votes, the Senate<br />
<strong>shall</strong> chuse from them by Ballot the <strong>Vice President</strong>.</p>
<p>The <strong>Congress</strong> may determine the Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day<br />
on which they <strong>shall</strong> give their Votes; which Day <strong>shall</strong> be the same<br />
throughout the *Federal Government*.</p>
<p>No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the<br />
*Federal Government*, at the time of the Adoption of this <strong>Constitution</strong>,<br />
<strong>shall</strong> be eligible to the <strong>Office</strong> of President; neither <strong>shall</strong> any Person<br />
be eligible to that <strong>Office</strong> who <strong>shall</strong> not have attained to the Age of<br />
thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the<br />
*Federal Government*.</p>
<p>In Case of the Removal of the President from <strong>Office</strong>, or of his Death,<br />
Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said<br />
<strong>Office</strong>, the Same <strong>shall</strong> devolve on the <strong>Vice President</strong>, and the <strong>Congress</strong><br />
may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or<br />
Inability, both of the President and <strong>Vice President</strong>, declaring what<br />
Officer <strong>shall</strong> then act as President, and such Officer <strong>shall</strong> act<br />
accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a President <strong>shall</strong> be<br />
elected.</p>
<p>The President <strong>shall</strong>, at stated Times, receive for his Services, a<br />
Compensation, which <strong>shall</strong> neither be <strong>increased</strong> nor diminished during the<br />
Period for which he <strong>shall</strong> have been elected, and he <strong>shall</strong> not receive<br />
within that Period any other Emolument from the *Federal Government*, or<br />
any of them.</p>
<p>Before he enter on the Execution of his <strong>Office</strong>, he <strong>shall</strong> take the<br />
following Oath or Affirmation:&#8211;&#8221;I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I<br />
will faithfully execute the <strong>Office</strong> of President of the *Federal<br />
Government*, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and<br />
defend the <strong>Constitution</strong> of the *Federal Government*.&#8221;<br />
Section. 2.</p>
<p>The President <strong>shall</strong> be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the<br />
*Federal Government*, and of the Militia of the several States, when<br />
called into the actual Service of the *Federal Government*; he may<br />
require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the<br />
executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their<br />
respective Offices, and he <strong>shall</strong> have Power to grant Reprieves and<br />
Pardons for Offences against the *Federal Government*, except in Cases<br />
of Impeachment.</p>
<p>He <strong>shall</strong> have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate,<br />
to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur;<br />
and he <strong>shall</strong> nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the<br />
Senate, <strong>shall</strong> appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls,<br />
Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the<br />
*Federal Government*, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise<br />
provided for, and which <strong>shall</strong> be established by Law: but the <strong>Congress</strong><br />
may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think<br />
proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of<br />
Departments.</p>
<p>The President <strong>shall</strong> have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen<br />
during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which <strong>shall</strong><br />
expire at the End of their next Session.<br />
Section. 3.</p>
<p>He <strong>shall</strong> from time to time give to the <strong>Congress</strong> Information of the State<br />
of the <strong>Union</strong>, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he<br />
<strong>shall</strong> judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions,<br />
convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement<br />
between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn<br />
them to such Time as he <strong>shall</strong> think proper; he <strong>shall</strong> receive Ambassadors<br />
and other public Ministers; he <strong>shall</strong> take Care that the Laws be<br />
faithfully executed, and <strong>shall</strong> Commission all the Officers of the<br />
*Federal Government*.<br />
Section. 4.</p>
<p>The President, <strong>Vice President</strong> and all civil Officers of the<br />
*Federal Government*, <strong>shall</strong> be removed from <strong>Office</strong> on Impeachment for,<br />
and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.</p>
<p>Article III.<br />
Section. 1.</p>
<p>The judicial Power of the *Federal Government* <strong>shall</strong> be vested in one<br />
supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the <strong>Congress</strong> may from time<br />
to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and<br />
inferior Courts, <strong>shall</strong> hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and<br />
<strong>shall</strong>, at stated Times, receive for their Services a Compensation, which<br />
<strong>shall</strong> not be diminished during their Continuance in <strong>Office</strong>.<br />
Section. 2.</p>
<p>The judicial Power <strong>shall</strong> extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising<br />
under this <strong>Constitution</strong>, the Laws of the *Federal Government*, and<br />
Treaties made, or which <strong>shall</strong> be made, under their Authority;&#8211;to all<br />
Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;&#8211;to all<br />
Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;&#8211;to Controversies to which<br />
the *Federal Government* <strong>shall</strong> be a Party;&#8211;to Controversies between two<br />
or more States;&#8211; between a State and Citizens of another<br />
State;&#8211;between Citizens of different States;&#8211;between Citizens of the<br />
same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between<br />
a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.</p>
<p>In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls,<br />
and those in which a State <strong>shall</strong> be Party, the supreme Court <strong>shall</strong> have<br />
original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the<br />
supreme Court <strong>shall</strong> have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and<br />
Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the <strong>Congress</strong><br />
<strong>shall</strong> make.</p>
<p>The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, <strong>shall</strong> be by<br />
Jury; and such Trial <strong>shall</strong> be held in the State where the said Crimes<br />
<strong>shall</strong> have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the<br />
Trial <strong>shall</strong> be at such Place or Places as the <strong>Congress</strong> may by Law have<br />
directed.<br />
Section. 3.</p>
<p>Treason against the *Federal Government*, <strong>shall</strong> consist only in levying<br />
<strong>War</strong> against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and<br />
Comfort. No Person <strong>shall</strong> be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony<br />
of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.</p>
<p>The <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>shall</strong> have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but<br />
no Attainder of Treason <strong>shall</strong> work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture<br />
except during the Life of the Person attainted.<br />
Article. IV.<br />
Section. 1.</p>
<p>Full Faith and Credit <strong>shall</strong> be given in each State to the public Acts,<br />
Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the <strong>Congress</strong><br />
may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and<br />
Proceedings <strong>shall</strong> be proved, and the Effect thereof.<br />
Section. 2.</p>
<p>The Citizens of each State <strong>shall</strong> be entitled to all Privileges and<br />
Immunities of Citizens in the several States.</p>
<p>A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who<br />
<strong>shall</strong> flee from Justice, and be found in another State, <strong>shall</strong> on Demand<br />
of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered<br />
up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.</p>
<p>No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the Laws<br />
thereof, escaping into another, <strong>shall</strong>, in Consequence of any Law or<br />
Regulation therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour, but <strong>shall</strong><br />
be delivered up on Claim of the Party to whom such Service or Labour may<br />
be due.<br />
Section. 3.</p>
<p>New States may be admitted by the <strong>Congress</strong> into this <strong>Union</strong>; but no new<br />
State <strong>shall</strong> be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other<br />
State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or<br />
Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States<br />
concerned as well as of the <strong>Congress</strong>.</p>
<p>The <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>shall</strong> have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules<br />
and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to<br />
the *Federal Government*; and nothing in this <strong>Constitution</strong> <strong>shall</strong> be so<br />
construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the *Federal Government*, or of<br />
any particular State.<br />
Section. 4.</p>
<p>The *Federal Government* <strong>shall</strong> guarantee to every State in this <strong>Union</strong> a<br />
Republican Form of Government, and <strong>shall</strong> protect each of them against<br />
Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive<br />
(when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence.<br />
Article. V.</p>
<p>The <strong>Congress</strong>, whenever two thirds of both Houses <strong>shall</strong> deem it<br />
necessary, <strong>shall</strong> propose Amendments to this <strong>Constitution</strong>, or, on the<br />
Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States,<br />
<strong>shall</strong> call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case,<br />
<strong>shall</strong> be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this<br />
<strong>Constitution</strong>, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the<br />
several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one<br />
or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the <strong>Congress</strong>;<br />
Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One<br />
thousand eight hundred and eight <strong>shall</strong> in any Manner affect the first<br />
and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that<br />
no State, without its Consent, <strong>shall</strong> be deprived of its equal Suffrage<br />
in the Senate.<br />
Article. VI.</p>
<p>All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption<br />
of this <strong>Constitution</strong>, <strong>shall</strong> be as valid against the *Federal Government*<br />
under this <strong>Constitution</strong>, as under the Confederation.</p>
<p>This <strong>Constitution</strong>, and the Laws of the *Federal Government* which <strong>shall</strong><br />
be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which <strong>shall</strong> be<br />
made, under the Authority of the *Federal Government*, <strong>shall</strong> be the<br />
supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State <strong>shall</strong> be bound<br />
thereby, any Thing in the <strong>Constitution</strong> or Laws of any State to the<br />
Contrary notwithstanding.</p>
<p>The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of<br />
the several <strong>State Legislatures</strong>, and all executive and judicial Officers,<br />
both of the *Federal Government* and of the several States, <strong>shall</strong> be<br />
bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this <strong>Constitution</strong>; but no<br />
religious Test <strong>shall</strong> ever be required as a Qualification to any <strong>Office</strong><br />
or public Trust under the *Federal Government*.<br />
Article. VII.</p>
<p>The Ratification of the Conventions of nine States, <strong>shall</strong> be sufficient<br />
for the Establishment of this <strong>Constitution</strong> between the States so<br />
ratifying the Same.</p>
<p>The Word, &#8220;the,&#8221; being interlined between the seventh and eighth Lines<br />
of the first Page, the Word &#8220;Thirty&#8221; being partly written on an Erazure<br />
in the fifteenth Line of the first Page, The Words &#8220;is tried&#8221; being<br />
interlined between the thirty second and thirty third Lines of the first<br />
Page and the Word &#8220;the&#8221; being interlined between the forty third and<br />
forty fourth Lines of the second Page.</p>
<p>Attest William Jackson Secretary</p>
<p>Done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the<br />
Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven<br />
hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independence of the<br />
*Federal Government* of America the Twelfth In witness whereof We have<br />
hereunto subscribed our Names,</p>
<p>+&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;+</p>
<p>*AIN&#8217;T TECHNOLOGY GRAND*  I updated the whole constitution to this<br />
modern wording with 3 seconds of typing and a mouse click.</p>
</thendestroyeveryth>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/11/ive-dropped-my-endorsement-of-newt-because-of-accusing-mitt-of-being-a-corporate-raider-when-in-fact-mitt-is-a-renovator-of-failed-and-corrupt-companies-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cuba Has Lower Infant Mortality Than US Despite Criminal Economic Blockade&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Castro opened up his prisons and insane asylums and told them they were,&gt; free to go (to the US).</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/11/cuba-has-lower-infant-mortality-than-us-despite-criminal-economic-blockadecastro-opened-up-his-prisons-and-insane-asylums-and-told-them-they-were-free-to-go-to-the-us/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/11/cuba-has-lower-infant-mortality-than-us-despite-criminal-economic-blockadecastro-opened-up-his-prisons-and-insane-asylums-and-told-them-they-were-free-to-go-to-the-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 21:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Prison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comb Bay Ya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miami]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western Hemisphere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/11/2012 4:48 PM, Bible Studies with Satan wrote: > BeamMeUpScotty wrote: > >> On 1/11/2012 3:10 PM, Bible Studies with Satan wrote: >>> Möebius Pretzel wrote: >>> >>>> Cuba: 4.9% infant mortality rate in 2011: The United States, which has >>>> maintained its criminal economic blockade of the country for more than >>>> 50 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>11</strong>/2012 4:48 PM, Bible Studies with Satan wrote:<br />
> BeamMeUpScotty wrote:<br />
><br />
>> On 1/<strong>11</strong>/2012 3:<strong>10</strong> PM, Bible Studies with Satan wrote:<br />
>>> Möebius Pretzel wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>> Cuba: 4.9% infant mortality rate in 2011: The <strong>United States</strong>, which has<br />
>>>> maintained its criminal economic blockade of the country for more than<br />
>>>> 50 years, records an infant mortality rate of 7.0<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> <a href="http://www.granma.cu/ingles/cuba-i/5ener-mortality.html" >http://www.granma.cu/ingles/cuba-i/5ener-mortality.html</a><br />
>>><br />
>>> Cuba is a lot better place than the <strong>US</strong> propagandists give credit for. It also<br />
>>> has the highest level of home ownership of any country in the Western<br />
>>> Hemisphere.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> Were you living in Miami when Carter said OK if you want to leave Cuba<br />
>> we will take you&#8230;. and 100,000 people left the Cuban Utopian Paradise<br />
>> for Miami?<br />
>><br />
> Yah, Castro opened up his prisons and insane asylums and told them they were<br />
> free to go (to the <strong>US</strong>).<br />
></p>
<p>And that accounts for you and your relatives but there were a lot more<br />
than just you.</p>
<p>>> Why did they leave great medical care and the promise of home ownership?<br />
>> For the medical wasteland and the  risky home ownership of <strong>MIAMI</strong>?<br />
>></p>
<p>Did the Prisons and Hospitals in Cuba NOT do a better job than the<br />
Prisons and hospitals here in the USA could do?</p>
<p>Are you suggesting that the USA has a better Mental health <strong>system</strong>? It<br />
sure sounds like you just admitted that fact.  And why would someone<br />
come to an <strong>American Prison</strong> rather than stay where the enlightened<br />
<strong>Socialists</strong> who are superior medical and mental health professionals, and<br />
are in charge and the prisoners know that they themselves will have a<br />
better chance of rehabilitation in Cuba.</p>
<p>Surely those Prisons were happy places and they sat around singing &#8220;<strong>Comb<br />
Bay Ya</strong>&#8221; while getting all the best treatment for their particular problem?</p>
<p>You&#8217;re dangerously close to being sent to a re-education work camp for<br />
suggesting that the Cuban <strong>Socialists</strong> are NOT better with/at curing<br />
people in Prisons and mental hospitals than are the Capitalists in the USA.</p>
<p>>> Why were they floating to Miami and risking death by climbing onto<br />
>> anything hat would float?<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> Or a better question is why aren&#8217;t you down in Miami trying to get a<br />
>> ride on a boat going to Cuba?<br />
>><br />
>><br />
></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/11/cuba-has-lower-infant-mortality-than-us-despite-criminal-economic-blockadecastro-opened-up-his-prisons-and-insane-asylums-and-told-them-they-were-free-to-go-to-the-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;ve dropped my endorsement of Newt because of accusing Mitt of being a corporate raider when in fact Mitt is a renovator of failed and corrupt companies</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/11/ive-dropped-my-endorsement-of-newt-because-of-accusing-mitt-of-being-a-corporate-raider-when-in-fact-mitt-is-a-renovator-of-failed-and-corrupt-companies/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/11/ive-dropped-my-endorsement-of-newt-because-of-accusing-mitt-of-being-a-corporate-raider-when-in-fact-mitt-is-a-renovator-of-failed-and-corrupt-companies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 20:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Individual Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[system]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/10/2012 3:24 PM, Phlip wrote: >> America is a Capitalist nation, right? > > The sacred holy Constitution did not specify which economic system we > were to use. Actually it excludes Socialism by default. The Constitution says we have Individual Rights and you can&#8217;t implement Socialism without violating those individual Rights like Property [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 3:24 PM, Phlip wrote:<br />
>> America is a <strong>Capitalist</strong> nation, right?<br />
><br />
> The sacred holy <strong>Constitution</strong> did not specify which economic <strong>system</strong> we<br />
> were to use.</p>
<p>Actually it excludes <strong>Socialism</strong> by default.   The <strong>Constitution</strong> says we<br />
have <strong>Individual Rights</strong> and you can&#8217;t implement <strong>Socialism</strong> without<br />
violating those individual Rights like Property Rights and Rights to be<br />
<strong>secure</strong> in our homes and person and papers&#8230;.. and so on.</p>
<p>Can you implement <strong>Socialism</strong> while a Republican form of Government is<br />
required by Article 4 section 4?</p>
<p>The only way to create <strong>Socialism</strong> is to use the courts to corrupt the<br />
constitution as you are presently attempting, I doubt you&#8217;ll be<br />
successful, I suspect judges and politicians will start to hide and stop<br />
corrupting the constitution as it will become a life and death decision<br />
in the <strong>future</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/11/ive-dropped-my-endorsement-of-newt-because-of-accusing-mitt-of-being-a-corporate-raider-when-in-fact-mitt-is-a-renovator-of-failed-and-corrupt-companies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Have you ever noticed that 99%</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/11/have-you-ever-noticed-that-99/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/11/have-you-ever-noticed-that-99/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clyde Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/10/2012 7:00 PM, Clyde Armstrong wrote: > Have you ever noticed that 99% of them appear to be uneducated, Have you ever noticed that &#8220;education&#8221; is NOT directly proportionate to their wealth or how smart they are?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 7:00 PM, <strong>Clyde Armstrong</strong> wrote:</p>
<p>> Have you ever noticed that 99% of them appear to be uneducated,</p>
<p>Have you ever noticed that &#8220;education&#8221; is NOT directly proportionate to<br />
their <strong>wealth</strong> or how smart they are?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/11/have-you-ever-noticed-that-99/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jeffrey Goldberg</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/11/jeffrey-goldberg/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/11/jeffrey-goldberg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Crachet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Carter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/10/2012 11:13 PM, Bob Crachet wrote: > The president has offered friendlier relations and we have been > rebuffed. Now the sword is drawn. Iran had a chance to choose peace or war. > > 0/to-prevent-war-give-iran-one-last-chance-commentary-by-jeffrey-goldberg.html They had that chance ever since Jimmy Carter asked them to play nice. The Iranians chose to kick [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 <strong>11</strong>:13 PM, <strong>Bob Crachet</strong> wrote:<br />
> The president has offered friendlier relations and we have been<br />
> rebuffed. Now the sword is drawn. Iran had a chance to choose peace or war.<br />
><br />
> 0/to-prevent-war-give-<strong>iran</strong>-one-last-chance-commentary-by-jeffrey-goldberg.html</a></p>
<p>They had that chance ever since <strong>Jimmy Carter</strong> asked them to play nice.<br />
The Iranians chose to kick Carter in the teeth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/11/jeffrey-goldberg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keynesian predictions have been spectacularly correct</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/11/keynesian-predictions-have-been-spectacularly-correct/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/11/keynesian-predictions-have-been-spectacularly-correct/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATURAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WARMING]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/10/2012 8:19 PM, Nickname unavailable wrote: > On Jan 10, 1:13 pm, &#8220;Sid9&#8243; wrote: >> &#8220;Werner&#8221; wrote in message >> >> news:19391644.657.1326221417335.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums @&#038;*$?%vben14&#8230; >> >>> On Tuesday, January 10, 2012 1:12:15 PM UTC-5, Nickname unavailable wrote: >>>> On Jan 10, 10:57 am, Werner wrote: >>>>> In the US the House writes tax and spend [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 8:19 PM, Nickname unavailable wrote:<br />
> On Jan <strong>10</strong>, 1:13 pm, &#8220;Sid9&#8243; <sid9 @ bellsouth.net> wrote:<br />
>> &#8220;Werner&#8221; <whetz ...@mac.com> wrote in message<br />
>><br />
>> news:19391644.657.1326221417335.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>vben14&#8230;<br />
>><br />
>>> On Tuesday, January <strong>10</strong>, 2012 1:12:15 PM <strong>UTC</strong>-5, Nickname unavailable wrote:<br />
>>>> On Jan <strong>10</strong>, <strong>10</strong>:57 am, Werner <whet ...@mac.com> wrote:<br />
>>>>> In the <strong>US</strong> the House writes tax and spend laws. The House has been<br />
>>>>> controlled by Dems for most of the past 100 years.<br />
>><br />
>>>>  you have democrats and the word liberal mixed up. there are plenty of<br />
>>>> crank democrats. since 1981, both parties have been almost identical.<br />
>>>> ypu simply cannot lie away 1933-1981.<br />
>><br />
>>> I suggest people like Sid9 have <strong>Democrats</strong> and Republican mixed up. Why<br />
>>> don&#8217;t you lecture Sid9?<br />
>><br />
>> I&#8217;m quite clear about the lassaiz faire Republican economics that started<br />
>> our country on the road to the instability we had.<br />
>><br />
>> From the founding of the <strong>United States</strong> until 1935 America suffered a<br />
>> financial crash or collapse on average every 18 years.</p>
<p>Until <strong>Progressives</strong> interrupted the natural economic cycle like they say<br />
humans interrupted the <strong>Global</strong> Warming cycle today?</p>
<p>Yet they tell us it&#8217;s bad to interfere with the Natural <strong>WARMING</strong> cycle.<br />
They tell us it&#8217;s good to interrupt the Natural economic cycles&#8230;.</p>
<p>This is typical logic of <strong>Progressives</strong> they&#8217;re willing to do what ever<br />
they want and destroy what ever <strong>NATURAL</strong> process they want, Or lie and<br />
fake science to tax and write laws as long as it promotes their failed<br />
<strong>ideology</strong> and growing government.</p>
<p></whet></whetz></sid9></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/11/keynesian-predictions-have-been-spectacularly-correct/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s 11% UNEMPLOYMENT RATE compared ot Bush&#8217;s 4.4 %</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/11/obamas-11-unemployment-rate-compared-ot-bushs-4-4-12/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/11/obamas-11-unemployment-rate-compared-ot-bushs-4-4-12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DATA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDIOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Tue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RATE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoorghis Jurgis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZERO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/10/2012 3:14 PM, Yoorghis @&#038;*$?%Jurgis.net wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:49:21 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: > >>> CIA intel is under a whole different set of secrecy rules and laws, >>> you mindless idiot. Some of which constitutes treason for ignoring >>> >>> Not so general economic data. >>> >> Obama is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 3:14 PM, <a href="mailto:Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net">Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Tue</strong>, <strong>10</strong> Jan 2012 12:49:21 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>>> <strong>CIA</strong> intel is under a whole different set of secrecy rules and laws,<br />
>>> you mindless idiot.  Some of which constitutes treason for ignoring<br />
>>><br />
>>> Not so general economic data.<br />
>>><br />
>> Obama is manipulating the economic <strong>DATA</strong>.<br />
><br />
> You cannot maniipulate public data, requested from a government<br />
> department, with almost no secrecy, which they have to use that is<br />
> available to any economics department&#8212;<br />
><br />
> <strong>IDIOT</strong>><br />
></p>
<p>And you can&#8217;t manipulate the &#8220;Congressional Budget <strong>Office</strong>&#8221;  yet Obama<br />
called in the head of the office to the <strong>White House</strong> yet Obama needs <strong>ZERO</strong><br />
contact with with the <strong>CBO</strong> head.</p>
<p>Why did he call in the head of the <strong>CBO</strong> that he needs no contact with<br />
unless it was to influence the <strong>CBO</strong> and get the numbers changed so that<br />
ObamaCare could be rammed through using manipulated <strong>DATA</strong>?</p>
<p>That makes you a bigger <strong>IDIOT</strong>.</p>
<p>Obama is manipulating the numbers.</p>
</thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/11/obamas-11-unemployment-rate-compared-ot-bushs-4-4-12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calling people racist without factual proof is using race to keep people in their place&#8230;.  so it&#8217;s RACIST to be running all around calling NON racists, racists.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/calling-people-racist-without-factual-proof-is-using-race-to-keep-people-in-their-place-so-its-racist-to-be-running-all-around-calling-non-racists-racists-4/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/calling-people-racist-without-factual-proof-is-using-race-to-keep-people-in-their-place-so-its-racist-to-be-running-all-around-calling-non-racists-racists-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[43]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BLOG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/10/2012 2:43 PM, Sid9 wrote: > > &#8220;BeamMeUpScotty&#8221; wrote in > message news:4F0C9314.8050403 @&#038;*$?%blackhole.nebulax.com&#8230; >> On 1/10/2012 2:28 PM, Sid9 wrote: >>> >>> &#8220;BeamMeUpScotty&#8221; wrote in >>> message news:4F0C7D89.6070206 @&#038;*$?%blackhole.nebulax.com&#8230; >>>> On 1/10/2012 11:46 AM, Sid9 wrote: >>>>> >>>>> &#8220;Werner&#8221; wrote in message >>>>> news:611138.587.1326212662768.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums @&#038;*$?%vbmi17&#8230; >>>>>> The supply of money and credit and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 2:<strong>43</strong> PM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
><br />
> &#8220;BeamMeUpScotty&#8221;
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote in<br />
> message news:4F0C9314.8050403<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>blackhole.nebulax.com&#8230;<br />
>> On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 2:28 PM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>> &#8220;BeamMeUpScotty&#8221; </thendestroyeverything>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote in<br />
>>> message news:4F0C7D89.6070206<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>blackhole.nebulax.com&#8230;<br />
>>>> On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 <strong>11</strong>:46 AM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> &#8220;Werner&#8221; <whetzner @mac.com> wrote in message<br />
>>>>> news:611138.587.1326212662768.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>vbmi17&#8230;<br />
>>>>>> The supply of <strong>money</strong> and credit and the markets for <strong>money</strong> and credit<br />
>>>>>> have been regulated thruought to juice the economy and generate<br />
>>>>>> taxable conditions, i.e.. &#8220;grow the economy&#8221;. This has operated as<br />
>>>>>> fiscal Keynesianism based on borrow and spend instead of tax and<br />
>>>>>> spend. Consumption was emcouraged and sunsidized. You get more of<br />
>>>>>> what<br />
>>>>>> is subsidized and less of what is taxed. We now live with the<br />
>>>>>> results.<br />
>>>>>> Austrian economists predicted it.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> St <strong>Reagan</strong>, <strong>HW</strong> Bush, and the very incompetent bush,jr borrowed and<br />
>>>>> spent.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> Republicans should have borrowed when the economy was weak and lowered<br />
>>>>> <strong>taxes</strong><br />
>>>>> Republicans should have raised <strong>taxes</strong> when the economy was strong<br />
>>>>> and cut<br />
>>>>> borrowing.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> Republicans have it all backwards.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> Cutting government spending at this time will accomplish nothing<br />
>>>>> but an<br />
>>>>> increase in <strong>unemployment</strong>&#8230;.but that&#8217;s what Republicans want.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> They believe higher <strong>unemployment</strong> will cause Obama to be defeated&#8230;.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> That&#8217;s all they care about&#8230;defeating Obama&#8230;.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> My personal belief is that the color if his skin is their main<br />
>>>>> objection<br />
>>>>> to Obama.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> Limbo has become a total unabashed racist on his program while he lies<br />
>>>>> about the economy.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Election time and time to bring out that racist name to beat up people<br />
>>>> and scare them&#8230;..<br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Calling people racist without factual proof is using race to keep<br />
>>>> people<br />
>>>> in their place&#8230;.  so it&#8217;s <strong>RACIST</strong> to be running all around calling <strong>NON</strong><br />
>>>> racists, racists.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> How does it feel to be more of a racist than the people you attack and<br />
>>>> call racist without proof.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> &#8211;<br />
>>>> A little <strong>Liberalism</strong> like a little alcohol, can be a good thing but when<br />
>>>> either of them take control, they become self destructive.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Tune in&#8230;.Noon to three <strong>EST</strong> on local AM stations<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> They get their show prep from me, so you&#8217;ll be getting it more direct<br />
>> just by reading my <strong>BLOG</strong>.<br />
>><br />
>> I come up with more and better retorts to the Liberals lies than any<br />
>> Radio show.<br />
>><br />
>> I usually hear my statements repeated from radio personalities anywhere<br />
>> from a few days to a few months after I post them here and<br />
>> simultaneously to my <strong>BLOG</strong>.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> &#8211;<br />
>> A little <strong>Liberalism</strong> like a little alcohol, can be a good thing but when<br />
>> either of them take control, they become self destructive.<br />
><br />
> You&#8217;re <acronym title="fucking"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> f&*$?%g</span></acronym> genius!<br />
> How come &#8220;the man&#8221; doesn&#8217;t let you have a show of your own?</p>
<p>Because I tell the truth&#8230;.   I don&#8217;t, just tell &#8220;your truth&#8221;.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s NOT a marketable skill.</p>
<p>You see I piss off everyone at some point.  I&#8217;m Not looking for or<br />
catering to an audience.</p>
<p></whetzner></thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/calling-people-racist-without-factual-proof-is-using-race-to-keep-people-in-their-place-so-its-racist-to-be-running-all-around-calling-non-racists-racists-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calling people racist without factual proof is using race to keep people in their place&#8230;.  so it&#8217;s RACIST to be running all around calling NON racists, racists.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/calling-people-racist-without-factual-proof-is-using-race-to-keep-people-in-their-place-so-its-racist-to-be-running-all-around-calling-non-racists-racists-3/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/calling-people-racist-without-factual-proof-is-using-race-to-keep-people-in-their-place-so-its-racist-to-be-running-all-around-calling-non-racists-racists-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[43]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BLOG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/10/2012 2:43 PM, Sid9 wrote: > > &#8220;BeamMeUpScotty&#8221; wrote in > message news:4F0C9314.8050403 @&#038;*$?%blackhole.nebulax.com&#8230; >> On 1/10/2012 2:28 PM, Sid9 wrote: >>> >>> &#8220;BeamMeUpScotty&#8221; wrote in >>> message news:4F0C7D89.6070206 @&#038;*$?%blackhole.nebulax.com&#8230; >>>> On 1/10/2012 11:46 AM, Sid9 wrote: >>>>> >>>>> &#8220;Werner&#8221; wrote in message >>>>> news:611138.587.1326212662768.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums @&#038;*$?%vbmi17&#8230; >>>>>> The supply of money and credit and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 2:<strong>43</strong> PM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
><br />
> &#8220;BeamMeUpScotty&#8221;
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote in<br />
> message news:4F0C9314.8050403<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>blackhole.nebulax.com&#8230;<br />
>> On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 2:28 PM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>> &#8220;BeamMeUpScotty&#8221; </thendestroyeverything>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote in<br />
>>> message news:4F0C7D89.6070206<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>blackhole.nebulax.com&#8230;<br />
>>>> On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 <strong>11</strong>:46 AM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> &#8220;Werner&#8221; <whetzner @mac.com> wrote in message<br />
>>>>> news:611138.587.1326212662768.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>vbmi17&#8230;<br />
>>>>>> The supply of <strong>money</strong> and credit and the markets for <strong>money</strong> and credit<br />
>>>>>> have been regulated thruought to juice the economy and generate<br />
>>>>>> taxable conditions, i.e.. &#8220;grow the economy&#8221;. This has operated as<br />
>>>>>> fiscal Keynesianism based on borrow and spend instead of tax and<br />
>>>>>> spend. Consumption was emcouraged and sunsidized. You get more of<br />
>>>>>> what<br />
>>>>>> is subsidized and less of what is taxed. We now live with the<br />
>>>>>> results.<br />
>>>>>> Austrian economists predicted it.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> St <strong>Reagan</strong>, <strong>HW</strong> Bush, and the very incompetent bush,jr borrowed and<br />
>>>>> spent.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> Republicans should have borrowed when the economy was weak and lowered<br />
>>>>> <strong>taxes</strong><br />
>>>>> Republicans should have raised <strong>taxes</strong> when the economy was strong<br />
>>>>> and cut<br />
>>>>> borrowing.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> Republicans have it all backwards.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> Cutting government spending at this time will accomplish nothing<br />
>>>>> but an<br />
>>>>> increase in <strong>unemployment</strong>&#8230;.but that&#8217;s what Republicans want.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> They believe higher <strong>unemployment</strong> will cause Obama to be defeated&#8230;.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> That&#8217;s all they care about&#8230;defeating Obama&#8230;.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> My personal belief is that the color if his skin is their main<br />
>>>>> objection<br />
>>>>> to Obama.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> Limbo has become a total unabashed racist on his program while he lies<br />
>>>>> about the economy.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Election time and time to bring out that racist name to beat up people<br />
>>>> and scare them&#8230;..<br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Calling people racist without factual proof is using race to keep<br />
>>>> people<br />
>>>> in their place&#8230;.  so it&#8217;s <strong>RACIST</strong> to be running all around calling <strong>NON</strong><br />
>>>> racists, racists.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> How does it feel to be more of a racist than the people you attack and<br />
>>>> call racist without proof.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> &#8211;<br />
>>>> A little <strong>Liberalism</strong> like a little alcohol, can be a good thing but when<br />
>>>> either of them take control, they become self destructive.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Tune in&#8230;.Noon to three <strong>EST</strong> on local AM stations<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> They get their show prep from me, so you&#8217;ll be getting it more direct<br />
>> just by reading my <strong>BLOG</strong>.<br />
>><br />
>> I come up with more and better retorts to the Liberals lies than any<br />
>> Radio show.<br />
>><br />
>> I usually hear my statements repeated from radio personalities anywhere<br />
>> from a few days to a few months after I post them here and<br />
>> simultaneously to my <strong>BLOG</strong>.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> &#8211;<br />
>> A little <strong>Liberalism</strong> like a little alcohol, can be a good thing but when<br />
>> either of them take control, they become self destructive.<br />
><br />
> You&#8217;re <acronym title="fucking"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> f&*$?%g</span></acronym> genius!<br />
> How come &#8220;the man&#8221; doesn&#8217;t let you have a show of your own?</p>
<p>Because I tell the truth&#8230;.   I don&#8217;t, just tell &#8220;your truth&#8221;.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s NOT a marketable skill.</p>
<p></whetzner></thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/calling-people-racist-without-factual-proof-is-using-race-to-keep-people-in-their-place-so-its-racist-to-be-running-all-around-calling-non-racists-racists-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calling people racist without factual proof is using race to keep people in their place&#8230;.  so it&#8217;s RACIST to be running all around calling NON racists, racists.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/calling-people-racist-without-factual-proof-is-using-race-to-keep-people-in-their-place-so-its-racist-to-be-running-all-around-calling-non-racists-racists-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/calling-people-racist-without-factual-proof-is-using-race-to-keep-people-in-their-place-so-its-racist-to-be-running-all-around-calling-non-racists-racists-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BLOG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/10/2012 2:28 PM, Sid9 wrote: > > &#8220;BeamMeUpScotty&#8221; wrote in > message news:4F0C7D89.6070206 @&#038;*$?%blackhole.nebulax.com&#8230; >> On 1/10/2012 11:46 AM, Sid9 wrote: >>> >>> &#8220;Werner&#8221; wrote in message >>> news:611138.587.1326212662768.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums @&#038;*$?%vbmi17&#8230; >>>> The supply of money and credit and the markets for money and credit >>>> have been regulated thruought to juice the economy and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 2:28 PM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
><br />
> &#8220;BeamMeUpScotty&#8221;
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote in<br />
> message news:4F0C7D89.6070206<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>blackhole.nebulax.com&#8230;<br />
>> On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 <strong>11</strong>:46 AM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>> &#8220;Werner&#8221; <whetzner @mac.com> wrote in message<br />
>>> news:611138.587.1326212662768.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>vbmi17&#8230;<br />
>>>> The supply of <strong>money</strong> and credit and the markets for <strong>money</strong> and credit<br />
>>>> have been regulated thruought to juice the economy and generate<br />
>>>> taxable conditions, i.e.. &#8220;grow the economy&#8221;. This has operated as<br />
>>>> fiscal Keynesianism based on borrow and spend instead of tax and<br />
>>>> spend. Consumption was emcouraged and sunsidized. You get more of what<br />
>>>> is subsidized and less of what is taxed. We now live with the results.<br />
>>>> Austrian economists predicted it.<br />
>>><br />
>>> St <strong>Reagan</strong>, <strong>HW</strong> Bush, and the very incompetent bush,jr borrowed and spent.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Republicans should have borrowed when the economy was weak and lowered<br />
>>> <strong>taxes</strong><br />
>>> Republicans should have raised <strong>taxes</strong> when the economy was strong and cut<br />
>>> borrowing.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Republicans have it all backwards.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Cutting government spending at this time will accomplish nothing but an<br />
>>> increase in <strong>unemployment</strong>&#8230;.but that&#8217;s what Republicans want.<br />
>>><br />
>>> They believe higher <strong>unemployment</strong> will cause Obama to be defeated&#8230;.<br />
>>><br />
>>> That&#8217;s all they care about&#8230;defeating Obama&#8230;.<br />
>>><br />
>>> My personal belief is that the color if his skin is their main objection<br />
>>> to Obama.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Limbo has become a total unabashed racist on his program while he lies<br />
>>> about the economy.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> Election time and time to bring out that racist name to beat up people<br />
>> and scare them&#8230;..<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> Calling people racist without factual proof is using race to keep people<br />
>> in their place&#8230;.  so it&#8217;s <strong>RACIST</strong> to be running all around calling <strong>NON</strong><br />
>> racists, racists.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> How does it feel to be more of a racist than the people you attack and<br />
>> call racist without proof.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> &#8211;<br />
>> A little <strong>Liberalism</strong> like a little alcohol, can be a good thing but when<br />
>> either of them take control, they become self destructive.<br />
><br />
> Tune in&#8230;.Noon to three <strong>EST</strong> on local AM stations</p>
<p>They get their show prep from me, so you&#8217;ll be getting it more direct<br />
just by reading my <strong>BLOG</strong>.</p>
<p>I come up with more and better retorts to the Liberals lies than any<br />
Radio show.</p>
<p>I usually hear my statements repeated from radio personalities anywhere<br />
from a few days to a few months after I post them here and<br />
simultaneously to my <strong>BLOG</strong>.</p>
<p></whetzner></thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/calling-people-racist-without-factual-proof-is-using-race-to-keep-people-in-their-place-so-its-racist-to-be-running-all-around-calling-non-racists-racists-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>*Run Forest run*,,,Run from the truth and the facts.  Liberals always do.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/run-forest-runrun-from-the-truth-and-the-facts-liberals-always-do/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/run-forest-runrun-from-the-truth-and-the-facts-liberals-always-do/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Mon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Run Forest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoorghis Jurgis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/10/2012 5:54 AM, NoBody wrote: > On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:33:03 -0700, Yoorghis @&#038;*$?%Jurgis.net wrote: > >> On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 12:18:06 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty >> wrote: >> >>>> >>>> Trying to argue this is not entirely a Bush/GOP mess we&#8217;re in is >>>> patently stupid. >> >> >> >>> =============================================================== >> >> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 5:54 AM, NoBody wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Mon</strong>, 09 Jan 2012 13:33:03 -0700, <a href="mailto:Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net">Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> <strong>On Mon</strong>, 09 Jan 2012 12:18:06 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Trying to argue this is not entirely a Bush/<strong>GOP</strong> mess we&#8217;re in is<br />
>>>> patently stupid.<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>><br />
>>> ===============================================================<br />
>><br />
>> The public debt on 9/30/1981 (Mr. Carter&#8217;s last budget year) was<br />
><br />
> Plagiarized, uncited, outdated <acronym title="crap"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> c&*$?%p</span></acronym> deleted.</p>
<p>*<strong>Run Forest</strong> run*</p>
<p>Run from the truth and the facts.  Liberals always do.</p>
</thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/run-forest-runrun-from-the-truth-and-the-facts-liberals-always-do/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So you&#8217;re saying I should be on the Government payroll?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/so-youre-saying-i-should-be-on-the-government-payroll-2/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/so-youre-saying-i-should-be-on-the-government-payroll-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FACTCHECK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lisa Rasmussen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Sat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ORG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transition Zone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/10/2012 1:06 PM, George Plimpton wrote: > On 1/10/2012 10:56 AM, Bible Studies with Satan wrote: >> BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >> >>> On 1/10/2012 11:31 AM, George Plimpton wrote: >>>> On 1/10/2012 7:34 AM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>>>> On 1/10/2012 12:04 AM, George Plimpton wrote: >>>>>> On 1/9/2012 1:11 PM, Transition Zone wrote: >>>>>>> On Jan [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 1:06 PM, George Plimpton wrote:<br />
> On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 <strong>10</strong>:56 AM, Bible Studies with Satan wrote:<br />
>> BeamMeUpScotty wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>> On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 <strong>11</strong>:31 AM, George Plimpton wrote:<br />
>>>> On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 7:34 AM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:<br />
>>>>> On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 12:04 AM, George Plimpton wrote:<br />
>>>>>> On 1/9/2012 1:<strong>11</strong> PM, <strong>Transition Zone</strong> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> On Jan 6, 3:49 pm, Stan de <strong>SD</strong><stand ...@gmail.com>    wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>> On Jan 2, 4:07 pm, &#8211; Me &#8211; I &#8211; My -<mys ...@myplace.mine>    wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> <strong>On Sat</strong>, 31 Dec 2011 14:58:38 -0500, PutYourBeamUpMeSlutty<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>
<theydestroyedmybr ...@<acronym title="asshole"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> a&*$?%e</span></acronym>.lax.com>    wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>>> &#8230;thieves liars and scum&#8230; cockroaches &#8230; ran to hide when the<br />
>>>>>>>>>> bright light<br />
>>>>>>>>>> was shined &#8230;<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> You shouldn&#8217;t support illegal invasions.<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> No fraudulent vote has ever been attributed toACORN.<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> Keep lying, junior.<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> Its not a lie.  Written material from <strong>ACORN</strong> has never required<br />
>>>>>>> illegal<br />
>>>>>>> or fraudulent activity.  One or two persons there are on their own.<br />
>>>>>>> Not anyone else than those one or two people.<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2011/01/12/acorn-leader-avoids-prison-for-vote..." >http://dailycaller.com/2011/01/12/acorn-leader-avoids-prison-for-vote&#8230;</a><br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> Sorry.  Not a top news source.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> But adequate to the task.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> <strong>FACTCHECK</strong>.<strong>ORG</strong><br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> ["Several <strong>ACORN</strong> canvassers *have been found guilty* of faking<br />
>>>>> registration forms and others are being investigated."]<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> <a href="http://news.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474979197438" >http://news.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474979197438</a><br />
>>>>> ["The community action group *<strong>ACORN</strong> has pleaded guilty* to election<br />
>>>>> law<br />
>>>>> violations, in a deal worked out with Nevada state attorney general.<br />
>>>>> Attorney for the defendant, <strong>Lisa Rasmussen</strong>, said a plea agreement was<br />
>>>>> worked out, and sentencing has been set for August <strong>10</strong>. Although there<br />
>>>>> have been many cases involving individuals from the group resulting in<br />
>>>>> convictions, this is the only case to date in which they were<br />
>>>>> collectively named as a felony defendant.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> The defunct political organization is looking at a fine of $5,000,<br />
>>>>> maximum. <strong>ACORN</strong> was accused of  *illegally registering voters* in a<br />
>>>>> scheme called "21" or "Blackjack." Allegedly, *workers were paid*<br />
>>>>> bonuses based on the number of voters they registered during the 2008<br />
>>>>> election in Nevada."]<br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Of course.  None of this is news, none is any great mystery, but the<br />
>>>> extremist left-wing partisans act as if it never happened or, if it did<br />
>>>> happen, it has no meaning.  I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve noticed little jimmie<br />
>>>> pigshit (&#8220;Clave&#8221;, ha ha, <strong>WTF</strong>?) who keeps shrilly demanding &#8220;proof&#8221; that<br />
>>>> any of the racketeers&#8217; 600,000+ fraudulently submitted voter<br />
>>>> registration forms led to any fraudulent votes.  That&#8217;s pure sophistry.<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>> I usually get back to them in my own time and I post the facts and let<br />
>>> them be the fool.<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>> I do other things also because I don&#8217;t get paid to post here like these<br />
>>> Democrat-<strong>Socialists</strong> get paid to do it.<br />
>><br />
>> That&#8217;s because conservatives aren&#8217;t smart enough to get <strong>money</strong> for<br />
>> posting on<br />
>> usenet.<br />
><br />
> You&#8217;re not smart or competent enough to get paid <strong>money</strong> for doing anything.</p>
<p>So you&#8217;re saying he should be on the Government payroll?</p>
</theydestroyedmybr></mys></stand></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/so-youre-saying-i-should-be-on-the-government-payroll-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So you&#8217;re saying I should be on the Government payroll?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/so-youre-saying-i-should-be-on-the-government-payroll/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/so-youre-saying-i-should-be-on-the-government-payroll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FACTCHECK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lisa Rasmussen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Sat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ORG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transition Zone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/10/2012 1:06 PM, George Plimpton wrote: > On 1/10/2012 10:56 AM, Bible Studies with Satan wrote: >> BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >> >>> On 1/10/2012 11:31 AM, George Plimpton wrote: >>>> On 1/10/2012 7:34 AM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>>>> On 1/10/2012 12:04 AM, George Plimpton wrote: >>>>>> On 1/9/2012 1:11 PM, Transition Zone wrote: >>>>>>> On Jan [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 1:06 PM, George Plimpton wrote:<br />
> On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 <strong>10</strong>:56 AM, Bible Studies with Satan wrote:<br />
>> BeamMeUpScotty wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>> On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 <strong>11</strong>:31 AM, George Plimpton wrote:<br />
>>>> On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 7:34 AM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:<br />
>>>>> On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 12:04 AM, George Plimpton wrote:<br />
>>>>>> On 1/9/2012 1:<strong>11</strong> PM, <strong>Transition Zone</strong> wrote:<br />
>>>>>>> On Jan 6, 3:49 pm, Stan de <strong>SD</strong><stand ...@gmail.com>    wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>> On Jan 2, 4:07 pm, &#8211; Me &#8211; I &#8211; My -<mys ...@myplace.mine>    wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> <strong>On Sat</strong>, 31 Dec 2011 14:58:38 -0500, PutYourBeamUpMeSlutty<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>>
<theydestroyedmybr ...@<acronym title="asshole"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> a&*$?%e</span></acronym>.lax.com>    wrote:<br />
>>>>>>>>>> &#8230;thieves liars and scum&#8230; cockroaches &#8230; ran to hide when the<br />
>>>>>>>>>> bright light<br />
>>>>>>>>>> was shined &#8230;<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> You shouldn&#8217;t support illegal invasions.<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>>> No fraudulent vote has ever been attributed toACORN.<br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> Keep lying, junior.<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> Its not a lie.  Written material from <strong>ACORN</strong> has never required<br />
>>>>>>> illegal<br />
>>>>>>> or fraudulent activity.  One or two persons there are on their own.<br />
>>>>>>> Not anyone else than those one or two people.<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>> <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2011/01/12/acorn-leader-avoids-prison-for-vote..." >http://dailycaller.com/2011/01/12/acorn-leader-avoids-prison-for-vote&#8230;</a><br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> Sorry.  Not a top news source.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> But adequate to the task.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> <strong>FACTCHECK</strong>.<strong>ORG</strong><br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> ["Several <strong>ACORN</strong> canvassers *have been found guilty* of faking<br />
>>>>> registration forms and others are being investigated."]<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> <a href="http://news.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474979197438" >http://news.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474979197438</a><br />
>>>>> ["The community action group *<strong>ACORN</strong> has pleaded guilty* to election<br />
>>>>> law<br />
>>>>> violations, in a deal worked out with Nevada state attorney general.<br />
>>>>> Attorney for the defendant, <strong>Lisa Rasmussen</strong>, said a plea agreement was<br />
>>>>> worked out, and sentencing has been set for August <strong>10</strong>. Although there<br />
>>>>> have been many cases involving individuals from the group resulting in<br />
>>>>> convictions, this is the only case to date in which they were<br />
>>>>> collectively named as a felony defendant.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> The defunct political organization is looking at a fine of $5,000,<br />
>>>>> maximum. <strong>ACORN</strong> was accused of  *illegally registering voters* in a<br />
>>>>> scheme called "21" or "Blackjack." Allegedly, *workers were paid*<br />
>>>>> bonuses based on the number of voters they registered during the 2008<br />
>>>>> election in Nevada."]<br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Of course.  None of this is news, none is any great mystery, but the<br />
>>>> extremist left-wing partisans act as if it never happened or, if it did<br />
>>>> happen, it has no meaning.  I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve noticed little jimmie<br />
>>>> pigshit (&#8220;Clave&#8221;, ha ha, <strong>WTF</strong>?) who keeps shrilly demanding &#8220;proof&#8221; that<br />
>>>> any of the racketeers&#8217; 600,000+ fraudulently submitted voter<br />
>>>> registration forms led to any fraudulent votes.  That&#8217;s pure sophistry.<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>> I usually get back to them in my own time and I post the facts and let<br />
>>> them be the fool.<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>> I do other things also because I don&#8217;t get paid to post here like these<br />
>>> Democrat-<strong>Socialists</strong> get paid to do it.<br />
>><br />
>> That&#8217;s because conservatives aren&#8217;t smart enough to get <strong>money</strong> for<br />
>> posting on<br />
>> usenet.<br />
><br />
> You&#8217;re not smart or competent enough to get paid <strong>money</strong> for doing anything.</p>
<p>So you&#8217;re saying I should be on the Government payroll?</p>
</theydestroyedmybr></mys></stand></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/so-youre-saying-i-should-be-on-the-government-payroll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calling people racist without factual proof is using race to keep people in their place&#8230;.  so it&#8217;s RACIST to be running all around calling NON racists, racists.</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/calling-people-racist-without-factual-proof-is-using-race-to-keep-people-in-their-place-so-its-racist-to-be-running-all-around-calling-non-racists-racists/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/calling-people-racist-without-factual-proof-is-using-race-to-keep-people-in-their-place-so-its-racist-to-be-running-all-around-calling-non-racists-racists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/10/2012 11:46 AM, Sid9 wrote: > > &#8220;Werner&#8221; wrote in message > news:611138.587.1326212662768.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums @&#038;*$?%vbmi17&#8230; >> The supply of money and credit and the markets for money and credit >> have been regulated thruought to juice the economy and generate >> taxable conditions, i.e.. &#8220;grow the economy&#8221;. This has operated as >> fiscal Keynesianism based [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 <strong>11</strong>:46 AM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
><br />
> &#8220;Werner&#8221; <whetzner @mac.com> wrote in message<br />
> news:611138.587.1326212662768.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>vbmi17&#8230;<br />
>> The supply of <strong>money</strong> and credit and the markets for <strong>money</strong> and credit<br />
>> have been regulated thruought to juice the economy and generate<br />
>> taxable conditions, i.e.. &#8220;grow the economy&#8221;. This has operated as<br />
>> fiscal Keynesianism based on borrow and spend instead of tax and<br />
>> spend. Consumption was emcouraged and sunsidized. You get more of what<br />
>> is subsidized and less of what is taxed. We now live with the results.<br />
>> Austrian economists predicted it.<br />
><br />
> St <strong>Reagan</strong>, <strong>HW</strong> Bush, and the very incompetent bush,jr borrowed and spent.<br />
><br />
> Republicans should have borrowed when the economy was weak and lowered<br />
> <strong>taxes</strong><br />
> Republicans should have raised <strong>taxes</strong> when the economy was strong and cut<br />
> borrowing.<br />
><br />
> Republicans have it all backwards.<br />
><br />
> Cutting government spending at this time will accomplish nothing but an<br />
> increase in <strong>unemployment</strong>&#8230;.but that&#8217;s what Republicans want.<br />
><br />
> They believe higher <strong>unemployment</strong> will cause Obama to be defeated&#8230;.<br />
><br />
> That&#8217;s all they care about&#8230;defeating Obama&#8230;.<br />
><br />
> My personal belief is that the color if his skin is their main objection<br />
> to Obama.<br />
><br />
> Limbo has become a total unabashed racist on his program while he lies<br />
> about the economy.</p>
<p>Election time and time to bring out that racist name to beat up people<br />
and scare them&#8230;..</p>
<p>Calling people racist without factual proof is using race to keep people<br />
in their place&#8230;.  so it&#8217;s <strong>RACIST</strong> to be running all around calling <strong>NON</strong><br />
racists, racists.</p>
<p>How does it feel to be more of a racist than the people you attack and<br />
call racist without proof.</p>
<p></whetzner></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/calling-people-racist-without-factual-proof-is-using-race-to-keep-people-in-their-place-so-its-racist-to-be-running-all-around-calling-non-racists-racists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOPers Better Rethink MITT ROMNEY! OBAMA&#8217;s People Are &#8216;ON&#8217; To Him!</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/gopers-better-rethink-mitt-romney-obamas-people-are-on-to-him/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/gopers-better-rethink-mitt-romney-obamas-people-are-on-to-him/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OBAMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROMNEY]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/10/2012 12:24 PM, LoveMyCRabs wrote: > Mitt told CNN last week, > > &#8220;As far as I know, I&#8217;ve never cheated on my wife.&#8221; And Clinton proved that it just doesn&#8217;t matter.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 12:24 PM, LoveMyCRabs wrote:<br />
> Mitt told <strong>CNN</strong> last week,<br />
><br />
> &#8220;As far as I know, I&#8217;ve never cheated on my wife.&#8221;</p>
<p>And <strong>Clinton</strong> proved that it just doesn&#8217;t matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/gopers-better-rethink-mitt-romney-obamas-people-are-on-to-him/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s 11% UNEMPLOYMENT RATE compared ot Bush&#8217;s 4.4 %</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/obamas-11-unemployment-rate-compared-ot-bushs-4-4-11/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/obamas-11-unemployment-rate-compared-ot-bushs-4-4-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fake Smile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Tue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RATE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoorghis Jurgis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/10/2012 12:41 PM, Yoorghis @&#038;*$?%Jurgis.net wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:57:00 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: > >> Even Obama laughed at the idea he had shovel ready jobs, there were none >> and he created NO jobs, > > What Obama did not do was figure that Wingers would block ALL his [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 12:41 PM, <a href="mailto:Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net">Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Tue</strong>, <strong>10</strong> Jan 2012 <strong>10</strong>:57:00 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> Even Obama laughed at the idea he had shovel ready jobs, there were none<br />
>> and he created NO jobs,<br />
><br />
> What Obama did not do was figure that Wingers would block ALL his<br />
> attemps to help America.<br />
><br />
> What YOU didn&#8217;t figure on that now the economy is slowly coming<br />
> around&#8212;that the record of wingers WILL be at issue later this year.</p>
<p>Re: <strong>Fake Smile</strong> stops Romney ??</p>
<p>Obama is a bigger fake than Romney could ever hope to be.</p>
<p>Obama spends all his time hiding who he really is.</p>
</thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/obamas-11-unemployment-rate-compared-ot-bushs-4-4-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Help America convert to a Socialist economy?</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/help-america-convert-to-a-socialist-economy/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/help-america-convert-to-a-socialist-economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Help America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Tue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoorghis Jurgis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/10/2012 12:41 PM, Yoorghis @&#038;*$?%Jurgis.net wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:57:00 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: > >> Even Obama laughed at the idea he had shovel ready jobs, there were none >> and he created NO jobs, > > What Obama did not do was figure that Wingers would block ALL his [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 12:41 PM, <a href="mailto:Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net">Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Tue</strong>, <strong>10</strong> Jan 2012 <strong>10</strong>:57:00 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> Even Obama laughed at the idea he had shovel ready jobs, there were none<br />
>> and he created NO jobs,<br />
><br />
> What Obama did not do was figure that Wingers would block ALL his<br />
> attemps to help America.<br />
></p>
<p><strong>Help America</strong> convert to a Socialist economy?</p>
<p>> What YOU didn&#8217;t figure on that now the economy is slowly coming<br />
> around&#8212;that the record of wingers WILL be at issue later this year.</p>
<p>That is propaganda there is no factual proof it&#8217;s a scam you<br />
Democrat-<strong>Socialists</strong> are continually scamming people.</p>
</thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/help-america-convert-to-a-socialist-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s 11% UNEMPLOYMENT RATE compared ot Bush&#8217;s 4.4 %</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/obamas-11-unemployment-rate-compared-ot-bushs-4-4-10/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/obamas-11-unemployment-rate-compared-ot-bushs-4-4-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DATA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOTHING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Mon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Tue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RATE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoorghis Jurgis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/10/2012 12:47 PM, Yoorghis @&#038;*$?%Jurgis.net wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:45:20 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty > wrote: > >> On 1/10/2012 2:00 AM, Yoorghis @&#038;*$?%Jurgis.net wrote: >>> On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:06:34 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Obama and his ilk are manipulating all the economic data. >>>> >>>> &#8211; >>> >>> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 12:47 PM, <a href="mailto:Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net">Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Tue</strong>, <strong>10</strong> Jan 2012 <strong>10</strong>:45:20 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 2:00 AM, <a href="mailto:Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net">Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
>>> <strong>On Mon</strong>, 09 Jan 2012 18:06:34 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>>> </thendestroyeverything>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>> Obama and his ilk are manipulating all the economic data.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> &#8211;<br />
>>><br />
>>> Just when we thought you couldn&#8217;t get more stupid&#8212;off you go<br />
>>> again&#8230;<br />
>><br />
>><br />
>> Wasn&#8217;t it you who said Bush was Manipulating the information coming from<br />
>> the <strong>CIA</strong>?<br />
><br />
> Considering it&#8217;s a proven fact now, yep.<br />
><br />
>> So Bush didn&#8217;t manipulate the <strong>CIA</strong> data&#8230;.<br />
><br />
> He did.  Else why was <strong>NOTHING</strong> Bush claimed proven to be true?<br />
><br />
> <strong>CIA</strong> intel is under a whole different set of secrecy rules and laws,<br />
> you mindless idiot.  Some of which constitutes treason for ignoring<br />
><br />
> Not so general economic data.<br />
><br />
Obama is manipulating the economic <strong>DATA</strong>.</p>
</thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/obamas-11-unemployment-rate-compared-ot-bushs-4-4-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roofs Collapsing In Alaska Under Massive Snow Falls</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/roofs-collapsing-in-alaska-under-massive-snow-falls/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/roofs-collapsing-in-alaska-under-massive-snow-falls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bash Warm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Ward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HUTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Mon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TIKI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/10/2012 12:22 AM, Bill Ward wrote: > On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 20:32:15 -0800, Mr. K wrote: > >> In article >> , >> Bret Cahill wrote: >> >>>>> A fishing village,, named Cordova, is experiencing what it is to >>>>> live in a winter of 18 feet of snowfall so far. Also rains [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 12:22 AM, <strong>Bill Ward</strong> wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Mon</strong>, 09 Jan 2012 20:32:15 -0800, Mr. K wrote:<br />
><br />
>> In article<br />
>> <ac748c76 -8833-4e8d-9318-c5cdee187ccd<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>f1g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>,<br />
>>  Bret Cahill <bret_e_cahill @yahoo.com> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>>>> A fishing village,, named Cordova, is experiencing what it is to<br />
>>>>> live in a winter of 18 feet of snowfall so far. Also rains have<br />
>>>>> added to the weight of the snow. At least 3 buildings have<br />
>>>>> collapsed and six homes severely damaged by partial collapses. Some<br />
>>>>> homes have doorways covered and the people are trapped in their<br />
>>>>> homes!<br />
>>>><br />
>>>>> It is a good thing it is &#8220;only weather&#8221; although somebody did say<br />
>>>>> that <strong>AGW</strong> will bring us very heavy snows,, if we don&#8217;t watch out.<br />
>>>>> But we shouldn&#8217;t have to Settle for this!! <strong>AGW</strong> or not!! C. Bash<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Warm air carries more moisture<br />
>>>> &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> BUT it then would not fall as snow but rain!<br />
>>><br />
>>> &#8220;Also rains have added to the weight of the snow.&#8221;<br />
>>><br />
>>><br />
>>> Bret Cahill<br />
>><br />
>> A geodesic dome probably would have faired better. Loads are<br />
>> distributed.<br />
><br />
> Maybe someday they&#8217;ll progress to igloos.</p>
<p>Considering the Globe is Warming, they will have to learn to build grass<br />
thatch and palm tree <strong>TIKI</strong> <strong>HUTS</strong>.</p>
<p></bret_e_cahill></ac748c76></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/roofs-collapsing-in-alaska-under-massive-snow-falls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s 11% UNEMPLOYMENT RATE compared ot Bush&#8217;s 4.4 %</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/obamas-11-unemployment-rate-compared-ot-bushs-4-4-9/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/obamas-11-unemployment-rate-compared-ot-bushs-4-4-9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Mon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Tue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RATE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UTC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/10/2012 10:01 AM, 2849 Dead wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:06:22 -0500, NoBody wrote: > >> On Mon, 9 Jan 2012 21:16:03 +0000 (UTC), 2849 Dead >> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:35:27 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >>> >>>> On 1/9/2012 2:13 PM, 2849 Dead wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 09 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 <strong>10</strong>:01 AM, 2849 Dead wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Tue</strong>, <strong>10</strong> Jan 2012 06:06:22 -0500, NoBody wrote:<br />
><br />
>> <strong>On Mon</strong>, 9 Jan 2012 21:16:03 +0000 (<strong>UTC</strong>), 2849 Dead <dead @gone.com><br />
>> wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>> <strong>On Mon</strong>, 09 Jan 2012 15:35:27 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>> On 1/9/2012 2:13 PM, 2849 Dead wrote:<br />
>>>>> <strong>On Mon</strong>, 09 Jan 2012 12:16:20 -0600, First. Post wrote:<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>>> <strong>On Mon</strong>, 9 Jan 2012 08:46:30 -0800 (<strong>PST</strong>), Gary<br />
>>>>>> <garydorman8618 @sbcglobal.net> wrote:<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> Unemployment is 8.5%, down from <strong>10</strong>.1% in October 2009.<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> When <strong>Jimmy Carter</strong> left office in January, 1980, <strong>unemployment</strong> was<br />
>>>>>>> 6.3%<br />
>>>>>>><br />
>>>>>>> Under <strong>Reagan</strong>, it rose to <strong>10</strong>.8% by November, 1982.<br />
>>>>>><br />
>>>>>> And <strong>Reagan</strong> won re election in 1984 because that rate at dropped by<br />
>>>>>> over 3% by then.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> Hmm.  It&#8217;s dropped by 2% for Obama.  Hmmm.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> Hmmm did <strong>Reagan</strong> fudge the numbers like Obama has, because the real<br />
>>>> number for Obama is around <strong>11</strong>%-16% <strong>unemployment</strong>.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Speaking of fudging numbers, could you explain why your &#8220;estimate&#8221;<br />
>>> varies by 50%?<br />
>>><br />
>>> Then you can explain exactly how the numbers are &#8220;fudged&#8221; by Obama.<br />
>>><br />
>>> I&#8217;m guessing you&#8217;ll run away now.<br />
>><br />
>> Pot, kettle, black.<br />
><br />
> Thank you for pointing that Beamy did, in fact, run away.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4p4-vPrcDBo&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>Here is your Obama jobs.   Obama himself will correct you.</p>
<p></garydorman8618></dead></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/obamas-11-unemployment-rate-compared-ot-bushs-4-4-9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keynesian predictions have been spectacularly correct:the doctrine of expansi onary austerity is of course crank science:Ferguson/Riedl etc. you’ll find confident  assertions that all that government borrowing would send interest rates soaring:)</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/keynesian-predictions-have-been-spectacularly-correctthe-doctrine-of-expansi-onary-austerity-is-of-course-crank-sciencefergusonriedl-etc-you%e2%80%99ll-find-confident-assertions-that-all-that-gov/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/keynesian-predictions-have-been-spectacularly-correctthe-doctrine-of-expansi-onary-austerity-is-of-course-crank-sciencefergusonriedl-etc-you%e2%80%99ll-find-confident-assertions-that-all-that-gov/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[37]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[43]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ferguson Riedl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/10/2012 9:37 AM, Old Pif wrote: > On Jan 9, 1:43 pm, phil scott wrote: > >> >> apparently the current attempt is to print some money to stimulate the >> economy, by giving people money to spend, inflationary forces.. >> > > To spend money is always a good idea and to spend [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 9:<strong>37</strong> AM, Old Pif wrote:<br />
> On Jan 9, 1:<strong>43</strong> pm, phil scott
<p ...@philscott.net> wrote:<br />
><br />
>><br />
>> apparently the current attempt is to print some <strong>money</strong> to stimulate the<br />
>> economy, by giving people <strong>money</strong> to spend, inflationary forces..<br />
>><br />
><br />
> To spend <strong>money</strong> is always a good idea and to spend <strong>money</strong> you don&#8217;t have<br />
> it a brilliant idea.</p>
<p>If true, why don&#8217;t they just keep printing as fast as they can and make<br />
us all millionaires?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/keynesian-predictions-have-been-spectacularly-correctthe-doctrine-of-expansi-onary-austerity-is-of-course-crank-sciencefergusonriedl-etc-you%e2%80%99ll-find-confident-assertions-that-all-that-gov/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s 11% UNEMPLOYMENT RATE compared ot Bush&#8217;s 4.4 %</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/obamas-11-unemployment-rate-compared-ot-bushs-4-4-8/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/obamas-11-unemployment-rate-compared-ot-bushs-4-4-8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LIAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Mon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RATE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/10/2012 9:24 AM, Sid9 wrote: > > &#8220;BeamMeUpScotty&#8221; wrote in > message news:4F0B4F8F.70607 @&#038;*$?%blackhole.nebulax.com&#8230; >> On 1/9/2012 2:13 PM, 2849 Dead wrote: >>> On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 12:16:20 -0600, First. Post wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 9 Jan 2012 08:46:30 -0800 (PST), Gary >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Unemployment is 8.5%, down from 10.1% [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 9:24 AM, Sid9 wrote:<br />
><br />
> &#8220;BeamMeUpScotty&#8221;
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote in<br />
> message news:4F0B4F8F.70607<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>blackhole.nebulax.com&#8230;<br />
>> On 1/9/2012 2:13 PM, 2849 Dead wrote:<br />
>>> <strong>On Mon</strong>, 09 Jan 2012 12:16:20 -0600, First. Post wrote:<br />
>>><br />
>>>> <strong>On Mon</strong>, 9 Jan 2012 08:46:30 -0800 (<strong>PST</strong>), Gary<br />
>>>> <garydorman8618 @sbcglobal.net> wrote:<br />
>>>><br />
>>>>> Unemployment is 8.5%, down from <strong>10</strong>.1% in October 2009.<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> When <strong>Jimmy Carter</strong> left office in January, 1980, <strong>unemployment</strong> was 6.3%<br />
>>>>><br />
>>>>> Under <strong>Reagan</strong>, it rose to <strong>10</strong>.8% by November, 1982.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> And <strong>Reagan</strong> won re election in 1984 because that rate at dropped by over<br />
>>>> 3% by then.<br />
>>><br />
>>> Hmm.  It&#8217;s dropped by 2% for Obama.  Hmmm.<br />
>><br />
>> Hmmm did <strong>Reagan</strong> fudge the numbers like Obama has, because the real<br />
>> number for Obama is around <strong>11</strong>%-16% <strong>unemployment</strong>.<br />
>><br />
>> Obama is a liar, you can&#8217;t trust anything he tells you.<br />
>><br />
>> &#8211;<br />
>> A little <strong>Liberalism</strong> like a little alcohol, can be a good thing but when<br />
>> either of them take control, they become self destructive.<br />
><br />
> Where&#8217;s my <strong>LIAR</strong> stamp?<br />
><br />
> <strong>LIAR</strong>!</p>
<p>Stuck to your <acronym title="ass"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> a&*$?%s</span></acronym>&#8230;.  just as your lips are stuck to Obama&#8217;s <acronym title="ass"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> a&*$?%s</span></acronym>.</p>
<p></garydorman8618></thendestroyeverything>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/obamas-11-unemployment-rate-compared-ot-bushs-4-4-8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s 11% UNEMPLOYMENT RATE compared ot Bush&#8217;s 4.4 %</title>
		<link>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/obamas-11-unemployment-rate-compared-ot-bushs-4-4-7/</link>
		<comments>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/obamas-11-unemployment-rate-compared-ot-bushs-4-4-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CREATE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INHERITED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JOBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OBAMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Mon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Tue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RATE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoorghis Jurgis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outsourcenews.net/ng/?p=27332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 1/10/2012 6:07 AM, NoBody wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 01:40:26 +0000 (UTC), 2849 Dead > wrote: > >> On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:19:58 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty wrote: >> >>> On 1/9/2012 5:55 PM, Yoorghis @&#038;*$?%Jurgis.net wrote: >>>> On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:35:27 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hmmm did [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 1/<strong>10</strong>/2012 6:07 AM, NoBody wrote:<br />
> <strong>On Tue</strong>, <strong>10</strong> Jan 2012 01:40:26 +0000 (<strong>UTC</strong>), 2849 Dead <dead @gone.com><br />
> wrote:<br />
><br />
>> <strong>On Mon</strong>, 09 Jan 2012 18:19:58 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:<br />
>><br />
>>> On 1/9/2012 5:55 PM, <a href="mailto:Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net">Yoorghis<acronym title="@"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> @&*$?%</span></acronym>Jurgis.net</a> wrote:<br />
>>>> <strong>On Mon</strong>, 09 Jan 2012 15:35:27 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty<br />
>>>>
<thendestroyeverything @blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:<br />
>>>><br />
>>>><br />
>>>>> Hmmm did <strong>Reagan</strong> fudge the numbers like Obama has, because the real<br />
>>>>> number for Obama is around <strong>11</strong>%-16% <strong>unemployment</strong>.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> a) <strong>Reagan</strong> <acronym title="fucked"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> f&*$?%d</span></acronym> everything up&#8212;including adding 191% to the natioal<br />
>>>> debt during his 2nd term.<br />
>>>><br />
>>>> b) Obama <strong>INHERITED</strong> 16% <strong>unemployment</strong> you dumb <acronym title="asshole"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> a&*$?%e</span></acronym><br />
>>><br />
>>> You slipped a digit&#8230;.  Obama inherited 6% to 7%  Obama has been<br />
>>> shrinking the jobs market so there were NO shovel ready jobs so *HOW DID<br />
>>> <strong>OBAMA</strong> <strong>CREATE</strong> <strong>JOBS</strong>*  ??????<br />
>><br />
>> Actually, it was 7.2% and climbing rapidly the day he took office, and<br />
>> 9.2% before his jobs stimulus package was passed.  And the stimulus<br />
>> package did create about 3.2 million jobs.</p>
<p>Even Obama laughed at the idea he had shovel ready jobs, there were none<br />
and he created NO jobs, he used the <strong>money</strong> to pay off his Obama<br />
supporters like the unions.</p>
<p><embed width='425' height='344' allowfullscreen='true' allowscriptaccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4p4-vPrcDBo&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" /></p>
<p>Obama was pulling numbers out of his <acronym title="ass"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;"> a&*$?%s</span></acronym>.</p>
</thendestroyeverything></dead></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://outsourcenews.net/ng/2012/01/10/obamas-11-unemployment-rate-compared-ot-bushs-4-4-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

