Co2 does not cause warming,
warming cause water vapor and CO2 to rise from the Ocean,
causing all carbon based life and carbon base energy, growing on this carbon based planet, above sea level for the last 600 million years.

This is not anything about anti-Hispanic, black, white, Asian or any other nationality. There is a huge space between the legal and illegal. Plus these illegal newcomer majorities have no interest in assimilation; learning the language but here for all the money entitlement programs. Research what foreign nationals can claim—IN YOUR STATE– that are denied to the gullible taxpayers. It’s specific in condemning 30 years of unfortunate administrations of nonchalant enforcement of illegal immigration. This is completely indifferent to the after effects of growing populations of people without no papers and no rights. We must hope that the next president has a policy of strengthening our boundaries and our immigration laws, which entails policing with E-Verify, Secure Communities and the 287G federal training policies for local authorities.

Thanks to patriotic Americans as Kris Kobach, a constitutional lawyer and the Kansas Secretary of State, Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona’s Maricopa County, Tom Tancredo has message of this never ending invasion has suddenly flowed to the surface and the people have finally realized the monetary, social consequences of the spreading poverty.

This year Rep. Lamar Smith’s has sponsored a mandated E-Verify bill (H.R. 2885), known as the “Legal Workforce Act” to substantiate as the most predominant problem solver for Americans in the jobless lines. Lamar Smith’s E-Verify bill is the only true method we have, to contain this contagion of people, who think they are justified in trespassing in this sovereign nation. For years the federal government has ignored the claims, that they have ignored the mass movement of illegal aliens entering America illegally. It was the prior Wednesday that the House Judiciary Committee passed Smith’s Legal Workforce Act afternoon 22-to-13. Only two amendments were approved by the committee, including one offered by Chairman Smith himself. The bill, H.R.2885, would require all employers to use E-Verify within 2 years for all non-agricultural new hires, while requiring federal, state and local agencies to check current employees as well within 6 months.

In Alabama a federal judge Blackburn opened the door to further enforcement, which next to E-Verify is the most extreme law in the land, against the illegal alien invasion. Alabama, Indiana, Georgia and Arizona are the only states who have passed state laws, to protect its own legal citizens that are not in favor of financially supporting anybody who slips across our permeable fence or dodges other port entries. It’s understandable that every foreigner who is poor, the deprived want to come to America. But with our own citizens, green card holders and legal foreigners hurting financially, no illegal alien should ever be hired, now or ever.

The financials are astronomical either through legal means or through extensive fraud. Whether its most entitlement being absorbed by the foothold baby citizenship law, or the crushing effect of money in health care, education and imprisonment. Billions of dollars have gone to satisfy people who have come through sponsorship, using the CHAIN MIGRATION laws. These laws have been forced upon us by the courts, that laid down the law that taxpayers must financially support people from abroad, whether we like it or not.

A permanent, E-Verify in future terms will become the most important tool, to divide legal workers from foreign nationals, returning the opportunity to all persons here legally. All the information on those who are out to defeat it and everything you want to know is available at NumbersUSA and Judicial Watch. Readers are offered the chance to read daily newspaper information, which generally is not seen in the Liberal press and startling disclosures at their website.

You as a taxpayer and a voter can attribute your influence, to millions of TEA PARTY members, independents, lost liberals, Democrats and Republicans by adding to the people’s push for America’s new lease on life. Contact your own local Senator or Representative or federal politician at 202-224-3121. Do you yearn to stop to illegal immigration, a brand new tax code with no loopholes for the wealthy or corporation and other slippery entities? Do you desire smaller government and uncorrupted lawmakers? Do you crave fair Trade Treaties, not what we have at this present time? Only the TEA PARTY can give you the freedom from overreaching government; the reams of regulations are stopping people from creating new businesses.

No Copyright ever. Americans must be exposed to the truth, not lies. Become a Whistle Blower if you notice illegal alien hired or working, to ICE at) division at 1-866-DHS-2ICE (866-347-2423). SEE SOMETHING? DO SOMETHING?

MY EARLIER BLOGS: http://brittanicus-enoughisenough.blogspot.com

Paul
http://howtobecomerichatayoungage.com/

He said Social Security is technically unConstitutional, but since people have been forced to pay in against their will, the government has to live up to its obligations as far as possible. He wants to cut the excess militarism and nationbuilding overseas to patch social security and medicare, and let the kids opt out.

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;]“”"]

…says “TO PAY DEBTS” applies to the last words “UNITED STATES” then all between also apply and if you say “UNITED STATES” includes States and People to allow the Federal government to pay welfare to States and the people then you also apply that to “TO PAY DEBTS”. Now are you sure Congress is directed to pay States Debts and PEOPLES debts? If it does I’ll quit paying all my debt right now and let Congress pay it.

CO2 can not hurt the environment,

~ CO2 caused the environment ~

Bruce A. Kershaw

p.s.- Why is it that liberals seldom discuss facts or positions and only seem to be able to must personal attacks against those who disagree with them? The intolerance on the left is inconsistent with the tolerance that the liberals claim to possess.

Merry Christmas!

When Ronald Reagan labeled the Soviet Union as the “Evil Empire”, the progressives went nuts. When George Bush called Iran, Iraq and North Korea “The Axis of Evil” they went nuts again. Progressivism, the Americanized version of European and Asian socialism, is made up mostly of hard-core socialists and secular humanists. Progressivism does not recognize the concept of evil. It believes in the perfectibility of human nature and the promise of utopia here on earth to be brought about by the enlightened, benevolent hand of government.

Masquerading as the savior of humanity, in reality all socialism, whether labeled socialism, Nazism, fascism, communism, or progressivism is the very essence of evil. During the twentieth century, socialism in its various forms was responsible for the slaughter of untold millions of innocent people through genocide, war, and political purges. In the Union of Soviet Socialistic Republics, 60 million were slaughtered; under the Nationalist Socialists German Workers Party, 20 million; and under the People’s Republic of China, 50 million. Add to that the millions who died under Pol Pot, Castro, Ho Chi Minh, and other socialists dictators, and you have an unbelievable amount of human suffering that can only be ascribed to evil.

For those unfortunate enough to live under one of the forms of socialism, life consists of misery, oppression and deprivation. Considering the consistent failure of socialism during its hundred and fifty year history, it is difficult to understand how any sane person could voluntarily choose it as the preferred systems of government and economics. There has never been an experiment in socialism of any duration that can be pointed to as an example of a successful culture. Every time it is tried, it fails miserably. To understand this incongruity of human experience we only have to look at the recent history of our own country.

Socialism is never presented as “socialism”. In fact, the most ardent supporters of socialist policies are offended when someone identifies them as socialists. In America, socialism is sold under the pseudonyms of “liberalism”, “progressivism” and occasionally “fiscal conservatism“. For that reason, most people who support socialist policies do so without knowing they are embracing socialism. The essence of socialism is deception. At first glance, it appears that socialist policies are motivated by the highest of human ideals, compassion, concern, caring, sympathy, etc. Socialists’ appeals are made on behalf of the poor, the children, the disenfranchised, and those who have been unfortunate in life’s lottery. The reality is that socialism appeals to the basest of human flaws: jealousy, hatred, greed and envy.

Progressives’ most potent weapon against capitalism is class envy and jealousy. Early on, they perfected the technique of demonizing “big business”. In the late eighteen hundreds progressives discovered that if they stereotyped “big businesses” as the enemy of the very people they served, the people, in return would grant progressives political power, not only over businesses but in other areas as well. Politicians found that by blaming the “robber barons of industry” for the ills of society— and there were many— they could win votes and support for their policies by posing as champions of the oppressed.

In the early stages of the progressive era, the targets were the railroads, oil companies, steel companies, tobacco companies, and others who were instrumental in raising the standard of living for the American People. Progressive demonization of “big business” reached a high point under President William McKinley in 1898 with the formation of the “U.S. Industrial Commission on Trusts”. Theodore Roosevelt won the Presidency in 1900 on the basis of his attacks on “big business”, and “trust busting” became the theme for his time in office. However, William Howard Taft who succeeded Roosevelt as President was even more successful, breaking up 90 large firms during his four years in office compared with Roosevelt’s 44 during his eight-year term.

The vilification of “big business” proved so politically successful for the progressives in the beginning that they have continued to use the tactic ever since to gain public support for their policies. The “villain du jour” currently is the insurance industry. A year ago, it was the banks. It all depends on what progressive policy is being pushed at the time. By successfully blaming the banking industry for our current economic woes rather than destructive government economic policies, Congress was able to gain support for its “bailout” packages. It is now attempting the same thing with health care, blaming insurance company “greed” for its high cost in order to gain support for their “reform” proposals.

Unfortunately, it seems to be working. The entity most often blamed by the media, and ultimately the public, for the exorbitant cost of health care is insurance company greed. The fact is that insurance companies are in general no more profitable than other companies of similar size, and a large percentage of their profits come from investments, not premiums. The real greed comes not from capitalism but from progressivism. The number one attraction of progressivism is its promise to provide the public with economic benefits they have not earned by forcefully taking from the earnings of others. This attitude is the epitome of greed.

Deception, corruption, envy, greed, jealously, coercion, thievery and wholesale murder mark the existence of socialism in the world. Socialism in America is represented by the progressives in and out of government, primarily in the Democratic Party but extant in the Republican Party as well, only to a lesser degree. The true “Axis of Evil” in America, that threatens to destroy the most successful system of government in world history are the progressive politicians, public sector unions, and federal bureaucracies.

In other words, for a Progressive it is better to live in safety as a slave than to live in danger with Liberty. Progressives feel they are entitled to all of the best that life has to offer whether or not they contribute to their own success. Progressives are the cancer, the plague that could eventually destroy mankind and any remote concept of Freedom. Not to mention, the world economy and America as we know it.

Source: Liberal Progressive Socialists
Site: http://blog.progressivesocialists.com

And now the Jill Armstrong, a former full-time nanny of the Harsh/ Whitman dungeon, came to the defense of the Housekeeper/Maid and told the San Francisco Chronicle that she believes Diaz’s claim because she “know[s] the family” and “what it was like.”

Meg, Meg, Meg, where do I start, you have reportedly spent $140 million of your own money to get elected Governor but you couldn’t use some of it to get your housekeeper (after nine years of service) some legal help to get her papers, and worse you lied about it. Wow, what a WITCH, of course I meant it with a “B”.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#39450925

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGRrNs8-s5w

But your comments on holding employers accountable for hiring undocumented workers real takes the cake, I assume you exempt yourself and your husband, or will you be turning yourself in.

Meg on holding employers accountable:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4fWLHiw8zA

Meg you think you can buy the election, but what puzzles many is if you real cared and loved California then why not do your civic duty and vote, seems more rhetoric than anything else.

In good times we might give you a try but not in our disaster mode that we find ourselves in after that so-called outsider Independent Republican, named Arnold Schwarzenegger (sold to us by radio personalities John and Ken), ruined our state, yah we will trust another one of you liars, think not. And another thing nine years this maid was in your house, in your house and you failed to learned this major thing about her, come on this sounds like a huge lie that no one can believe in.

Ebay paid out $200,000 because Nutmeg assaulted an employee, so it’s not the first time she has mistreated an employee. Good luck winning Nutmeg, money will buy you admiration from the majority just from the Gay Old Party (GOP), but not from all of California.

But your comments on holding employers accountable for hiring undocumented workers real takes the cake, I assume you exempt yourself and your husband, or will you be turning yourself in.

Meg on holding employers accountable:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4fWLHiw8zA

Meg, nine years this maid was in your house, in your house and you failed to learn this major thing about her, come on this sounds like a huge lie on your part, especially when you admit that your husband signed the notification letter.

Meg you think you can buy the election, but what puzzles many is if you real cared and loved California then why not do your civic duty and vote, seems more rhetoric than anything else. In good times we might give you a try but not in our disaster mode that we find ourselves in after that so-called outsider Independent Republican, named Arnold Schwarzenegger (sold to us by radio personalities John and Ken), ruined our state, yah we will trust another one of you liars, think not. And another thing nine years this maid was in your house, in your house and you failed to learned this major thing about her, come on this sounds like a huge lie on your part.

Ebay paid out $200,000 because Nutmeg assaulted an employee, so it’s not the first time she has mistreated an employee. Good luck winning Nutmeg, money won’t buy you admiration from the majority just from the Gay Old Party (GOP).

Historically leftists have believed Socialism/Marxism can only be achieved through deceit, lies and sacrificing anyone to advance their cause. Obama has already sacrificed the trust of Americans, repeatedly lied about most everything since he took office, and in the run up to the White House duped middle of the road Democrats to elect him President. Now Obama is ready to sacrifice the entire Democratic Party next election, giving amnesty to 12 million illegal immigrants.

Middle of the road Democrats just can’t understand why Obama will throw them under the bus in November if he can get amnesty first for 12 million illegal immigrants. Obama wants to insure that when he leaves office, 12 million illegal immigrants can stay in the U.S., and the border is still open so 12 million more illegal immigrants can enter America; that will insure Obama’s leftist constituency can find back to back—several million foreign born residents to push for a Socialist U.S. Government. Do Americans actually think anything they say in protest will discourage Mexican illegal immigrants moving to their state? Mexican illegal immigrants come from a country where force is commonplace. But illegal immigrants do understand getting arrested by police and that is why they have to stop Arizona’s new anti-immigration law. Arizona’s new law threatens the leftist agenda that includes overburdening financially U.S. Government, local and state infrastructures to cause economic chaos.

Leftists/Marxists historically move on democracies to take power when things are in chaos. Obama is now in position to cause that chaos. But unexpectedly, to the dismay of the left, Americans in state after state are standing up to support Arizona. If the Arizona law passes in enough states, and amnesty does not pass, the leftists will have lost a strong weapon to destroy America.

Consequently leftists have become Desperate and are now in the process of trying to consolidate 170 liberal and civil rights groups into a coalition to match the Tea Party’s political energy and influence—this should be taken seriously. The first question: “Who are the players behind this new liberal coalition?” Historically in America leftists have displayed a victim mentality, giving up, not voting after the political tide turned against them as it has now. Obama as a Presidential candidate managed to motivate and hold leftist factions together; and gained the support of ethic groups that prior were at odds. However since the election Obama’s policies have fractured the left, Obama has lost most Independents. So who is going to organize and motivate the new coalition of 170 liberal and civil rights groups? In other countries, to affect the outcome of elections, extreme leftists have formed liberal and human rights coalitions that covertly were coordinated by Communists and labor unions.

Typically when communists are concerned they will lose an election(s), they cause chaos including violent protests to obscure important issues and disseminate false information to confuse voters to vote for leftist candidates. In America should Communists be identified, playing an integral role in the new 170 liberal/civil rights groups’ coalition, Patriots should vehemently expose early the communists and their associations. Millions of younger Americans thanks to the educational system, don’t comprehend that communism calls for the overthrow of democratic governments as the United States and abolishing their Constitution.

I know the proponents of this law say that the majority approves of this law, but the majority is not always right. Would women or non-whites have the vote if we listen to the majority of the day, would the non-whites have equal rights (and equal access to churches, housing, restaurants, hotels, retail stores, schools, colleges and yes water fountains) if we listen to the majority of the day? We all know the answer, a resounding, NO!

Today we are committed to a worldwide struggle to promote and protect the rights of all who wish to be free. In a time of domestic crisis men of good will and generosity should be able to unite regardless of party or politics and do what is right, not what is just popular with the majority. Some men comprehend discrimination by never have experiencing it in their lives, but the majority will only understand after it happens to them.

Science is all about chance? Like the 50% chance of rain?

HHHHhhhhhhmMMMMmmmm???????

Global Warming is an Hypothesis, Much like a Sci-fi plot in a movie.

Did you measure the ozone hole effect on melting the ice at Antarctica?
Maybe that’s both problems solved, and maybe that ozone hole is natural.
Maybe the water from the ice is sucked up through the ozone hole too.

I know the proponents of this law say that the majority approves of this law, but the majority is not always right. Would women or non-whites have the vote if we listen to the majority of the day, would the non-whites have equal rights (and equal access to churches, housing, restaurants, hotels, retail stores, schools, colleges and yes water fountains) if we listen to the majority of the day? We all know the answer, a resounding, NO!

Today we are committed to a worldwide struggle to promote and protect the rights of all who wish to be free. In a time of domestic crisis men of good will and generosity should be able to unite regardless of party or politics and do what is right, not what is just popular with the majority. Some men comprehend discrimination by never have experiencing it in their lives, but the majority will only understand after it happens to them.

back to the line I posted earlier

< -(Left&Right)Tyranny--------------FREEDOM(Libertarian)->

*FREEDOM SCALE*
< -Government-control—-------|-------------FREEDOM->
|

It’s not Liberal/Conservative it is, TYRANNY/FREEDOM

So GM is BROKE and already trashed all it’s original owners for billions
they had invested and now they are pissing through the taxpayers money
that was stupidly given to them.

If GM couldn’t make it with private investors, why will it survive with
tax dollars any better? Are they different dollars than before? Why is
GM any better. Who and what has made it better than the company that
failed and it’s assets then stolen from investors/owners by the
government and given to new different investors?

It was blatant NON taxed government redistribution, theft from one
person and given to another person

I always purchased GM cars, I will never buy another GM car period.

Just how is it working out, GM has been “given” billions and “loaned”
billions more and they have to cook the books to claim they will someday
actually get the money paid back, *if* things go well.

["Many say the first computer is the "difference engine." The first of
these devices was conceived in 1786 by J.H. Müller. It was never built.
Difference engines were forgotten and then rediscovered in 1822 by
Englishman Charles Babbage..who is known as "the father of the
Computer". This machine used the decimal numbers system and was powered
by cranking a handle. The British government first financed the project
but then later cut off support. Babbage went on to design his much more
general analytical engine but later returned and produced an improved
design (his "Difference Engine No. 2") between 1834 and 1869.

Others point out that this is the first ELECTRONIC computer. The
earliest computer known is the Antikythera Machine, a mechanical device
that computed the positions of the astrological signs on any given date,
past or future. It was discovered in an ancient shipwreck in the
Mediterranean Sea and dates to approximately 250 BC. The
designer/builder is not known, but because of its similarity to other
mechanical devices known to have been designed by Archimedes, it is
probably his work.

Still others will say the abacus is the first computer. They were
invented by the Chinese between 2600 BC and 300 BC is considered as the
first computer ever. Abacus was used by the merchants and Clerks in China.

Here is still more input:

If you mean Electronic Computer, it was a man called Alan Turing
from Cambridge UK, who was drafted in to Bletchley park secret base
where they worked at cracking the WWII enigma codes that the Germans
used every day. The Germans changed their Enigma machines to a four
digit code maker. However, Because what went on at Bletchley Park the
computer made from thousands of valves was kept top secret up until
recently. The computer, named Colossus was smashed to pieces at the end
of the war. The buildings have now been restored as a tourist center."]

from our creator and recognized by our constitution.

Probably why the constitution has ARTICLE 5.

The power to amend the constitution.

All I need to do is point out all your failures…..
Ain’t that a hoot?

Creditors in a bankruptcy would have received the $82 billion in assets
to cover their investment. Obama stole that $82 billion and
redistributed it.

I see well over 100 billion stolen from taxpayers/investors by the
government and given to someone else. All to prop up GM for 3 years.

How many trillion in debt is the U.S. Congress and how many trillion in
assets do they have?

Upon his return to the Soviet Union in 1927, Ivanov began an effort to
organize hybridization experiments at Sukhumi using ape sperm and human
females. Eventually in 1929, through the help of Gorbunov, he obtained
the support of the Society of Materialist Biologists, a group associated
with the Communist Academy. In the spring of 1929 the Society set up a
commission to plan Ivanov’s experiments at Sukhumi. They decided that at
least five volunteer women would be needed for the project. However, in
June 1929, before any inseminations had taken place, Ivanov learned that
the only postpubescent male ape remaining at Sukhumi (an orangutan) had
died. A new set of chimps would not arrive at Sukhumi until the summer
of 1930.

http://www.scotsman.com/news/international/stalin_s_half_man_half_ape_super_warriors_1_686693

A person has inalienable #RIGHTS, that means a person is also
inalienable, You are you and a person due to the creator and have rights
due to the Creator, you can’t give or take away any inalienable RIGHTS
or the personage that has those RIGHTS.

Both are beyond human societies power and beyond the constitutional
power of the Federal Government.

Unique Persons are created at conception, That’s NOT the way I want it,
it’s just the way it is.

You didn’t say that the explosives were armed and ready or that a gun
was involved. Try again.

Liberals supported sending guns to Mexico and importing illegal
terrorists/aliens across the Mexican Border and they can carry bombs and
the TSA doesn’t even care.

If the government/TSA are going to do a half assed JOB they might as
well NOT exist at all.

Typical Liberal hysterics, all excited over a law that is irrelevant.

it looks like about $250 Billion was “invested” from all involved for a
company that you contend owns about $80 billion in assets?

that’s about $170 billion in debt and gifts from “WE THE PEOPLE”.

When will that be repaid at the present rate of payment to investors?

Well here we are on a new chicken ranch and the chickens are gathering
in mass and they may come home to roost. What will you do then, gun
down and declare war on *WE THE PEOPLE* like you chose to do to Islam?

You declare war way to easily.

In France you have *NO* free Speech.

Isn’t it Liberal-Progressives that want to kill persons in the uterus
and to allow themselves to choose or discriminate by skin color and
physical or mental aptitude what is born and who is going to be denied
the chance to vote at 18. Killing voters before they reach 18 years is
still discrimination and racism.

Abortion is violating the right to vote. And there is NO guarantee that
the diagnosis and reason for aborting a person is actually 100% accurate
and that means there are some babies KILLED for NO reason at all.

The issue was that the Federal Government wanted to have more power and
to get it they were willing to tax and otherwise steal and corrupt the
South and West and any States that were for the States Power.

This is a cycle set up in the constitution that will be replayed an
infinite number of times, as the people allow the Federal government to
overstep the constitutional power and then the “We The People” Fight
back and try to STOP the Federal Government from ignoring the constitution.

The founder set up the constitution with State powers and Federal powers
for a reason, whether they knew it would forever be a fight is just a
guess but that’s what it is. We have had one Civil War and I expect
there will be more Civil Wars over States Powers in the future.

When they elect a Republican in Mass. they are saying they are NOT a
utopian Marxist, but that’s as good as it gets.

NO matter what you do, it will never satisfy Liberals they always take
both sides of every issue. Liberals are duplicitous scum.

Maybe Football players should carry a concealed weapon in the showers?
They can shoot the pedophiles, like they shoot armed robbers in SC.

If you propose slicing human live into different values and one being
valued more than others, then you’re back to supporting slavery as it’s
based on the same ethics.

You are willing to take one age or color or sex and allow the “courts”
to decide which is more valued as a human life.

Hitler did that….. he put Jews in teh same place you put a baby in
the uterus.

I’m NOT calling you Hitler, what I am saying is that your philosophy is
what allows someone like Hitler to become the killer of 6 million human
lives for no rational reason. Your philosophy is dangerous, because you
assume government will always be rational.

You give the government the power of life and death by it’s own value
system and there is no guarantee government will decide the same as you.
so giving government the power to declare someone or some droup as NON
human life makes no sense.

Human Life is when there is a human cell with enough information to
create an unique human being with individual DNA.

The moral question is whether government/courts are wise enough to
decide what human life is a person.

We know when human life starts(conception) we know that killing a baby
in a uterus is illegal in certain conditions and ways. And outside the
uterus the same baby being killed is murder.

A botched abortion with the very same baby surviving outside the uterus,
is murder when the baby is killed outside…. same baby same end.
One is called an abortion the other is a murder.

Birth makes you a citizen, there is no such constitutional power to
declare a person. And persons have RIGHTS. There is NO Federal power
to declare when someone is a person. Any laws that attempt to do so are
unconstitutional and out of Federal Jurisdiction.

Efficient government is *NOT* compassionate government.

Democrat-Socialists send babies still in the uterus to the Auschwitz of
Planned Parent hood….

What an efficient way to kill human life that government has deemed a waste.

The poor are unable to compete and that means they are NOT let into the
capitalist economy, they are kept poor and it’s done on purpose.

The best Idea is to keep government small all the time.

enemy of the constitution… there are many among us.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=4LWlkXRZ3CA

The constitution said they did. Why didn’t you just change the
constitution?

The civil war was not for the better, and we NO longer use mules…..
and there was NO civil war to end the use of mules was there?

You use GUN and force and tyranny because it is about power and money,
it was never about slavery, that was a facade.

Explain how violating human RIGHTS with slavery is worse than the human
RIGHTS violation of killing babies in the uterus?

Those Human lives are “human life” the same as the slaves were human life.

Why send your kids to school? They won’t each and every one come out
with the same exact success rate.

You have lost the fact that money management alone will NOT dig us out
of the hole the spending got us into. We will have to also get a second
job and that’s a metaphor for actually having to work hard to earn more
money(GDP) while cutting the spending.

The way you make more money and get the GDP stimulated is to produce and
the best way to stimulate that is to *reduce REGULATIONS* .

You Liberals are clinging to your utopian ideology and spending.

The Constitution says the Federal government can tax and fund “for the
*common* Defence” and the South was part of Common defence group unless
they had already legitimately ended their membership in the common
defence Union.

There is the catch-22, it is illegal for the United States to attack
it’s own States because each member deserves *common defence* and the
Federal Government can’t attack any member State. So in order to attack
Southern States, they could NOT be one of the ones covered by “common
defence”.

The Federal government had NO authority to declare or pay for an
offensive war, and there is no war that is between THE States if it is
the United States fighting the war, it is a war with the Federal
government which is again not recognized as different from the States
according to you.

This would mean the Southern States would have had to vote to fight the
illegal war against themselves…… it never happened. So they were
obviously NO longer part of the union since their votes were NOT needed
to declare war.

Half the Nation was NOT represented in that vote. If they did vote
then the south was NO longer part of the Union. And that means that it
was Constitutional to leave the union.

You call me an idiot and then post a site that parroted what I just told
you as your evidence?

The more cold winters the more Ozone depletion….. that’s what your
referenced site says. Which by the way was the site referenced in the
article I quoted in my full post before you deleted most of it.

They tell you arctic winters have been trending colder which kind of
shoots a hole in the Global Warming myth.

I plan to hound them and hound them until they are gone gone gone.

Run the jurisdiction of the enforcement to the larger power that seeks
to consolidate their tyranny over the masses.

Then there was General/President Grant who instituted reconstruction
that did much the same thing as the National Guard did 100 years later.

It didn’t work the first time, and has been less than successful this
time by your reckoning.

But you say we are all still racist? I’m confused, you fixed it all with
violence but you say we’re all still racists?

How is that progress?

Was it a success? Did the National Guard solve the problem? Is the inner
city integrated? Why was there *white flight* in the northern cities?
Explain….

That’s because it was a DEMOCRAT governor named George Wallace that was
backing segregation. And there was Robert Byrd a Democrat KKK leader
that was also for segregation…. as opposed to Lincoln a Republican
and Grant also a Republican who started the first violence and military
intervention to end segregation after the war.

Yes well…. it looks like the Civil war has never fully ended and the
North is going to continue persecuting and harassing the South for at
least another 100 years.

Republicans Started the Civil War and freed the slaves and supported
reconstruction after the war which put blacks in political office in the
south, the Republican party would hardly be a place for Racist Bigots to
go to?

Religious white people were the majority that were against Slavery….
The wealthy don’t need slaves they have money to pay for all they need done.

Dixiecrats were/are Democrats….

We see that Democrats have the real history of racism. You say you’ve
have had a “come to Jesus Moment” and say you are NO longer the hateful
racists that you always have been, and I say good for you, but the
constant hate for the south where most black stayed and lived is hard to
over look.

If history is etched in stone, you need to grow some stones.

How do you know that prices and or demand will rise and NOT keep falling
as the baby boomers die off?

In which case “once out of the country” there is no income and where the
money is, is none of the IRS’s business since having cash or other
assets is not income. And therefore NOT subject to any INCOME TAX laws.

They have the power to tax income and some other taxes but no power to
stop you from putting “your” money in a bank of your choice.

Didn’t John Kerry spend $7 million dollars over seas on a yacht?

why would that be less suspicious than a Swiss account, to begin with
the Yacht might have been $3.5 Million and Kerry just got a receipt for
the IRS for $7 Million or received a rebate and now that $3.5 Million is
loose in Europe and hidden by John Kerry….

or the Darwin rout of mother earth / Gaia and evolution.

Reducing regulations is primary since regulation is what stifles
commerce, the more regulations, the more it costs our economy. Most
regulations are used by existing businesses to reduce competition, and
competition would help us get out of this depression.

End the “war on drugs” make them legal(increase competition) and sold
at any drug store and push for prostitution to be legal too, that will
take the BIG money out of trafficking in drugs, and that will reduce the
gangs/dealers income and that should reduce the value of sex slaves and
hurt the human trafficking business income also. Why have illegal
prostitutes when there are so many legal tax paying prostitutes out there?

http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/viewVideo.php?video_id=12541&title=portugal-legalizes-drugs–crime-usage-falls

Create Bi-color money, Red money for inside the USA and Original Green
money outside the USA….. NOTHING BUT A COLOR/INK difference, and
suddenly sending red money home to Mexico would be useless as the RED
money would be useless in Mexico since the Banks and etc wouldn’t accept
it abroad. All electronic money leaving the USA would be debited the
Sales tax when the money is sent/spent.

The Drug dealers would have Red money that they need to exchange for
green money, makes it hard to do in large amounts and hard to spend and
more expensive to deal with….. that *makes Drug smuggling less*
*profitable* as would dropping the income tax and installing a NATIONAL
“NEW ITEM” SALES TAX *NOT* IMPLEMENTING A VAT TAX WHICH WILL HELP THE
DRUG DEALERS and illegals by making their tax free money leaving the
country even more valuable. If they had to buy/exchange the RED money
for GREEN money then you would charge the sales tax at that point.

Have the States Ratify an amendment withdrawing the 16th amendment…
Maybe enact something similar to the http://fairtax.org (Federal sales
tax) *BUT NOT A VAT or VALUE ADDED TAX* with the same amendment that
removes income tax and the IRS, preferably a Federal *NEW ITEM* sales tax.

This will reduce the number of tax crimes that people are in jails for
and it will give the people back their privacy. It will also promote
*GREEN* living where people will save more and waste less and buy second
hand and wear things out rather than discard and buy new. Then add to
the amendment that *if congress raises any tax by* 1% *they are forced*
*to cut*
every single expenditure of the *government by* 3%.

Begin to draw down troops as needed from around the world. Put half
of our military bases along the southern Border to minimize the amount
of border that the Border patrol needs to watch, the military and
Federal trespassing laws will push the illegals to spaces between the
military bases.

This tax/border policy will financially assault the drug dealers and
hookers and other underground economy’s by forcing them to have to pay
tax when they *spend their money* , which will further reduce the
benefit of dealing in other illegal stuff. There needs to be one type
of dollar for use inside America and one type(color) of dollars for use
outside the USA. That will make it harder for smugglers to get money out
of the country and if they do spend it here then they will pay the sales
tax and that money is used to enforce the laws to catch smugglers. We
are “right now” taking money from peoples pay checks before they get
them and at the same time we don’t tax drug dealers or hookers and
illegals or others at all, we are penalizing the working Americans and
giving a bonus to illegal activity. Sales tax will also encourage saving
money rather than encouraging the leveraging of every dime you can
borrow like income tax does.

This will drive people in the underground economy to become part of the
real economy. It will stop most of the turf killings and end our
immigration problems with illegals stealing identities since they will
be paying tax(as sales tax). Offer illegals less welfare and charge them
tax and they won’t be so eager to come here and we won’t need to chase
them……

End Social Security/Medicare, grandfather it out of existence.

Pass an amendment to the constitution that makes all
*laws_and_treaties* have a seven year sunset clause, and it requires
that each law/treaty be voted by a separate roll call vote every seven
years to continue to be maintained in our laws.

There should also be some constitutional amendments to stifle congress’
borrowing and spending making it more difficult for that process. And a
constitutional amendment to limit the Interstate Commerce Clause. The
politicians use that clause to justify all sorts of socialist c&*$?%p. The
founding fathers never meant for it to be so broadly applied. Limit it
with an amendment, so government can’t justify every crazy idea by
saying its legal under the interstate commerce clause.

Pass another amendment creating term limits on congress so the House
has 6 terms and the Senate has 2 terms, for a total of 12 years in
either side of congress. WE NEED TO STOP CONGRESS FROM PASSING FRIVOLOUS
LAWS TAXES AND BORROWING AND ENDLESSLY PRINTING MONEY.

To quit filling the jails with people over *social taboos* , we
need to take away congress’ ability to “social engineer” businesses or
private people by removing the governments use of tax code to manipulate
people.

Government needs to spend 10% less every year until they meet the
income of the government. The best way, is to
*use_both_cutting_and_taxing* , the Congress should implement a rule to
force an across the board spending freeze and then across the board cuts
on the government spending, to do that we have to include a law in our
TAX amendment to the constitution that can’t be easily circumvented, to
force them to cut spending 3% for every 1% Congress raise taxes. So any
federal sales tax increase would result in automatic spending cuts using
a baseline of 10% taxes.

And we need to give up our roll as the police man of the world, let
them fight their own fights. We also need fewer crimes for people to be
committing, we need fewer police and prisons to support…. the above
drug and tax plan, will reduce police and prison needs by at least that
10% that this plan suggested cutting each year.

NO welfare to corporations, and cut welfare to private people by 10%
each year until it is 10% of today’s cost. Any way you look at it, we’re
in DEEP for a long time.

I know you are always consistent so when I noticed you overlooked the
ACORN problem I was sure you would want me to remind you that you want
to hold ACORN to your own standard.

I’m Just glade to help you……

The hate crime laws make them Federal crimes…

It is a way to have the Federal Government take control of a crime where
they want a particular outcome.

It is a process to side step the constitutional provisions of jurisdiction.

We said it was Natural and it is. And this says that cold which isn’t
man made is a key part of the NATURAL process of ozone holes. There
are few new man made CFC’s UP there these days, the rest must be over 30
year old man made CFC’s and that is less than likely considering they
break down so readily.

rain, NO rain, heat, No heat, rain No rain snow no snow hurricanes, NO
hurricanes, Glaciers, NO glaciers, Ocean Levels rise, NO rise, earth
quakes or none volcanoes, or no volcanoes CO2, NO CO2, ice cores, NO
ice El Nino, None…..

All signals of global warming,

If the Iranians close off the shipping lanes you would go to war, but if
we have the pipeline we could simply protest and get allies to condemn
and boycott all Iranian oil as we close their shipping lanes and stop
all their oil.

It’s better than bombing them into the stone age and going to war. It’s
cheaper than building new Aircraft carriers and fighter jets too.

Obama and Democrats are NOT really Americans are they? If they were,
why would they do what is NOT in our best interest? Why would they do
what will get many many young American kids killed in a war that will
happen over oil in the future. You Democrats are causing ALL the OIL
WARS, the ones we have already had and the wars we will have in the future.

You think Organized crime puts all their activity in the corporate
minutes at all the meetings?

You make “stupid” look good.

There are extremes in any discussion and unless they make a point they
are obtuse and mostly irrelevant.

You seek to muddy the lines so that you can redefine what freedom is.
That is a typical Liberal-Progressive approach to reality. You try to
take it to theoretical and mythical and ridiculous ends and then return
to reality with “your” new definition.

Maybe we are all Socialists NOW!

["The war is currently costing around £6million ($9million) a week, and
a fortnight ago it was estimated that Britain’s bill for the campaign
has already reached £75million. Up to 50 air raids are being carried out
every day.

But some experts believe this is a massive underestimate of the true
extent of the bill.

Francis Tusa, editor of the Defence Analysis newsletter, said the true
cost of all the bombs dropped and sorties flown up to the end of April
was about £300million($450million).

He said the bill would probably exceed £1billion by the end of
September, if the war is still going on by then."]

What did the Brits do from April to October/November They would have
had to earned $100million from the war to have ended it with only
$330million spent.

If you use the same source they say the entire war was only 2.7 Billion
dollars…. but go ahead and divide 2.7 billion by 28 members and tell
me how much each should be paying of the 2.7 billion and they figure we
are paying 1.1 billion….. That is 10 times what we should be paying.

Country Funds Spent By
Canada $50 million CAD mid-October 2011[212]
France $413 million USD October 2011[213]
Italy $940 million USD June 2011[214]
United Kingdom $333 million USD 31 October 2011[215][216]
United States $1.1 billion USD September 2011[217]

The above numbers are proclaimed as real but they can’t be… so the
powers that be are obviously fudging the costs. And it would be about
100 million per Nation if every Nation paid their equal share using NATO
numbers.

The U.S. paid all but the 4 other Nations share and we/NATO used Italy
for the planes take off and landing and we the USA built most of their
military infrastructure since WWII and no doubt NATO/the U.S. paid again
to use those Bases for the Libya war. No doubt they included the “cost
of the U.S. using Italian Air Bases that we built” as Italy making their
contribution.

This is all another Money Laundering scheme by the Obama administration,
they are shuffling around and hiding the money.

In reality Libya cost 8-12 billion and the U.S. paid 6-8 billion of it.
BUT nny way you cut it we paid about 80%

Even NATO says we paid close to 50%

+———————————————————————+

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/06/10/gates-blasts-nato-questions-future-alliance/

[" *The United States pays more than 75 percent of the defense* *budget*
*for* the 28 *members of the North Atlantic* *Treaty* *Organization* .
Gates said that by slashing their own defense budgets, the European
nations are falling short in Libya."]

*IN SHORT, WE SUBSIDIZE THE OTHER NATO COUNTRIES MILITARY*

and then we pay more into NATO and we pay more into each WAR.

[""While every alliance member voted for the Libya mission, less than
half have participated at all, and fewer than a third have been willing
to participate in the strike mission. Frankly, many of those allies
sitting on the sidelines do so not because they do not want to
participate, but simply because they cannot. The military capabilities
simply aren't there.""]

[""The mightiest military alliance in history is only 11 weeks into an
operation against a poorly armed regime in a sparsely populated country,
yet many allies are beginning to run short of munitions, requiring the
U.S., once more, to make up the difference," Gates said"]

So NOT just 70% of the intelligence and 80% of all in flight refueling,
but also we had to make up for their shortage of munitions…..

In short we(OBAMA) did most of it (Intelligence and logistics and money)
and dragged the others kicking and screaming along with it.

Billions and Trillions of taxpayer dollars are falling down a rabbit
hole and never to be seen again, where is the money?

*FOLLOW THE MONEY*

We do more than they can because freedom means that you can peruse your
own interests, in China those interests you peruse must be in the
interest of the Government.

China will never allow freedom and will never create the diversity of
human achievement and wealth that the USA has created. China pursues
mediocrity, and they will be mediocre.

The Socialist plan to get them all to an “A” is to make it easier for
the disadvantaged NOT to make it harder for the disadvantaged. All this
experiment did was show that students will *cheat willingly* to help the
dumb kids, so the smart ones can keep their GPA high. That’s the smart
thing to do when you are going to lose your college scholarship funds
due to the dumb kids. Make sure they pass the class even if you have to
help them cheat to do it.

Us against them in the classroom only works when they are individuals,
because as a team they will out-cheat the authorities every time.

Once again you get *A HARVARD VILLAGE IDIOT NAMED OBAMA*

You’re saying there was little to NO diversity in the grades and they
were all but one or two an “A” and I say that is improbable in a real
setting. Getting a common grade would necessitate that the class
average a “C” otherwise the class was designed wrong and it was too easy
or too hard. You have to expect that half the kids will do well and
half will do poorly other wise a class where everyone can get an “A”
must be too easy. You say 90% or better got an “A” I say those numbers
are skewed.

Do you pay a lawyer to tell you the newest laws and how to obey them
every time you go out into public?

But suddenly there are new laws that say you have to buy ObamaCare
insurance and yet without a lawyer you have no idea whether you are
abiding by the law or NOT and by doing NOTHING you are breaking the law.
And there was no reason to expect a new law that covers areas of our
life where the constitution gives no power to the federal government to
write laws on.

But if you live by the constitution and realize there is NO government
power in the Constitution that allows the federal Government to force
you to buy ObamaCare…. you need NO lawyer and don’t need to hunt
down a 2000 page law that you have no idea about when you step across
the border or graduate the worthless government schools.

The constitution tells you all you need to survive, until the government
starts writing unconstitutional laws. Then all organization and all
congruency in Legislation is compromised and we have no way to base what
laws to follow or what laws may even exist.

Federal laws on education should NOT exist so I need NOT ever concern
myself with Federal education laws until the constitution is changed
with an amendment….. giving the Federal Government the power to write
laws on education.

ALL I NEED TO keep up to date with… is the constitution, that tells me
what areas the other laws may be in and if I need to look deeper for my
own reasons then I can.

The Federal government does *NOT* have the power to write “any” law
about “any” part of my life, they have specific powers that are
delegated to them. That allows me to know what areas of my life will
have Federal laws that apply to me…. without some way to manage my
responsibility I would be keeping up with hundreds of thousands of laws
and tens of thousands of NEW laws each year.

Perhaps you should take a File systems course, I took one in college to
help my Computer Science credits and expand MY ability to organize
company run computer projects. Standardized file systems and hierarchy
help you control large systems without committing the whole system to
your own synapses memory.

But you have to stick to the format or the file system is useless, much
like the constitution is useless when you ignore it and write
unconstitutional laws and then we lose the organization and have to look
at every last single law to see how it effects what you are about to do.

The banked were coerced into “making loans” under threat of racial
discrimination law suits and so they passed as many of those to the
taxpayer backed Fannie & Freddie because they knew that the
Progressive-Socialist plans to *REDISTRIBUTE* risk would eventually come
back to bite the Progressive designers of this back door redistribution
plan.

They sell their home mortgages to Fannie and Freddie, Fannie and
Freddie bundle them and make them securities and then sell them to
investors and that keeps the markets “fluid”, until it didn’t.

The shadow system of government and Fannie and Freddie that handle 70%
of *ALL* home mortgages in the USA?

Yes it kept Clinton’s Attorney General and ACORN’s Obama from suing them
for racial Discrimination and banks being forced to pay billions in laws
suit costs. Probably a smart business decision at that moment in time.

I think they probably should have opened front corporations for
marketing to lend the money they were coerced to lend…. But I don’t
know all the regulations they were forced to deal with as well as those
who were being coerced by government knew them.

["Amendment X
*The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution* ,
nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States
respectively, or to the people."]

This says it has to be a power “delegated to the United States BY THE
CONSTITUTION”.

That means it Can *NOT* be delegated to the United States BY THE COURTS.

Show me the word *interpretation* in the constitution, I did a word
search and it doesn’t exist.

They can NOT interpret the law but they can “rule” it is NOT the courts
jurisdiction and that means the law is NOT usable by the court.

You mean they do what they were created to do and they act as an
appellate court and review the cases, and “if the law” is NOT legitimate
they can NOT rule on the case and they say that the law is out of their
jurisdiction. The courts have coined the phrase “unconstitutional” for
laws that they can NOT enforce due to an error in the law that makes it
unenforceable because the courts have no power to hear a case that has
been created from an incompetent Legislature that writes laws which
don’t comply with the limited Powers and restrictions in the constitution.

The courts have NO power to rewrite a law or the U.S. Constitution.
That means the Powers listed in the constitution are the only powers
that the Government has. The Court can NOT find new powers.

Without that little fact the entire annotation is a useless opinion by
someone that isn’t following the constitution correctly because they
have no power to force you to live by their version of what it means.

Had it been offered as the courts NON binding version of what the courts
suggest the constitution means, then it is worth what it cost me just as
I can write the same stuff with my version. But at least mine would be
more accurate.

What that comes down to is having the terrorists tell you that Islam
says it’s a good thing to kill NON Muslims…..

“You” would rather have terrorist Imams telling Muslims to kill those
that are NOT Muslim, than to have each person read and evaluate what
Allah says and decide whether it’s a good thing to kill a person for
having a different religion?

I believe there would be fewer people that want to kill non Muslims, if
each Muslim were to read and evaluate and comprehend the meaning on
their own. When you have a central elite few that tell you what to
think, it leads to corruption and lies.

The Courts are NOT given the power to interpret the constitution in the
constitution and they don’t have the moral or ethical standing to
proclaim themselves to be a better person than I am.

If I read a book on aerodynamics, I don’t need to be a papered scientist
to understand it. And neither did two bicycle builders in North
Carolina. It seems that the Wright Brothers understood manned Flight
better than the “scientists” and yes better than the courts, so why
can’t they understand the constitution every bit as well as any other
human?

You’re stuck on the idea that the Government collective is smarter than
the average person and therefore has the moral imperative to RULE OVER
“We The average People”…. good luck with that one.

If we let you and the courts tell us what to think then, we haven’t
progressed beyond letting the King of England telling us what to think,
and we would still be burning witches at the stake. I like the idea
that each person can read and adhere to the constitution and when
there’s a conflict, the law is for the courts to use or NOT use and for
the Legislature to fix if it’s NOT usable.

THE ONLY POWER THE COURTS HAVE IS TO FIND THEY HAVE NO JURISDICTION
BECAUSE THE LAW/POWER IS NOT WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT OR STATE.

That is what UNCONSTITUTIONAL means, that the jurisdiction for the power
or law does NOT exist. When at the Supreme court, it is the last
appellate court and when they say UNCONSTITUTIONAL they are saying that
it’s a law they can’t apply because it is NOT within their jurisdiction.
They have no power/jurisdiction to enforce a law that’s NOT legitimate.
That leaves the Supreme court with one decision as per a law or
constitutional power, and that is…. can the court use the law, if NOT
then it is NOT within the courts jurisdiction and they coined the
phrase(made up the term) “unconstitutional” to describe that law/power.

They don’t interpret or change the law because they have NO
constitutional power to do that.

["Article. I.
Section. 1.
*All legislative Powers* herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of
the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of
Representatives."]

*The courts have to obey the laws NOT rewrite them*

No one muffed the final and no one was in a car accident, no parents died?

What a perfect class, or what a lying cheating class?