Atheism isn’t an Absence in belief

On 9/2/2010 11:47 PM, Free Lunch wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:53:09 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty
> @&*$?%Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote in alt.atheism:
>
>>
>>>> DanielSan wrote:
>>>>> On 9/1/2010 4:42 PM, Free Lunch wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 19:15:11 -0400, “Scout”
>>>>>> wrote in alt.atheism:
>>>>
>>>>>>> DanielSan wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 9/1/2010 3:31 PM, IlBeBa…@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>> That question needs to be asked of atheism which is based on
>>>>>>>>> faith , thereby making it religious also.
>>>>
>>>>>>>> Atheism isn’t based on faith.
>>>>
>>>>>>> Already addressed and refuted.
>>>>
>>>>>> Atheism is not based on faith.
>>>>
>>>>>>> Now try something which hasn’t already been refuted.
>>>>
>>>>>> What was refuted?
>>>>
>>>>> Scout thinks that to not believe in anything that doesn’t have
>>>>> evidence requires faith…………………
>>
>> SO how did life begin and do you have evidence or faith in it.
>
> There is evidence that life began. This is a necessary conclusion from
> the evidence that the universe could not support life throughout its
> history. Faith has nothing to do with it.

Life wasn’t transferred here from space, or placed here by god…. it
had to start here and you are sure….. You believe it.

There is only one DNA that makes life and it was able to reproduce and
there was never and is not now, new life with new DNA that can’t
reproduce being created every day?

If all it takes is acids and nucleotides…. and all the building block
for life are here, what reason is there for no new DNA in new life that
we recognize as new and different from us?

With the dice rolling every day for 4 billion years, shouldn’t there be
two or three types of life(DNA) on the planet, considering it took less
than a billion years to create the first life.

Not to mention all the failed life that didn’t reproduce, yet it has
never been dug up.

Then there is transmutation…..

[Louis Kervran claims to have conducted experiments and studies
demonstrating phenomena such as anomalous increase in calcium and
decrease in magnesium levels during the synthesis of egg shells and
anomalous excretion of magnesium. Here, "anomalous" refers to a
violation of the Lavoisier principle. He formulated the biological
transmutation hypothesis as an explanation.

For example, one of the claims is that biological organisms can
transform Potassium into Calcium via the addition of one hydrogen
nucleus: K39 + H1 = Ca40. None of the fissioned elements would be
travelling at high velocity since biological organisms lack any
mechanism to do this. The environment would not have neither high
pressure nor high temperature since no biological organims could survive
the required pressure and temperature, not even for extremely short
periods of time. This amounts to having a nuclear fusion reaction in a
low energy environment, which would go against basic physic laws.[1]]