ism isn’t an Absence in belief

On 8/28/2010 2:32 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> Beam Me Up Scotty @&*$?%Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote
> in news:4C79514C.1070500 @&*$?%Blackhole.NebulaX.com:
>
>> On 8/28/2010 2:50 AM, Dakota wrote:
>>> On Fri 8/27/10 19:46, LifeBinge wrote:
>>>> On Aug 27, 5:22 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty >>>> Everyth…@Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 8/27/2010 1:56 PM, DanielSan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/27/2010 9:33 AM, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/27/2010 12:23 AM, DanielSan wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 8/26/2010 9:13 AM, SaPeIsMa wrote:
>>>>>>>>> “Colanth”
wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:fnnc76p4fg9v6eckko5ouot67he4hu9rph @&*$?%4ax.com…
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 23:31:11 -0500,
>>>>>>>>>> “SaPeIsMa”
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And yet, atheists BELIEVE there is no god
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And Catholic nuns eat ice cream, but eating ice cream isn’t
>>>>>>>>>> part of being a nun, and believing there is no god isn’t part
>>>>>>>>>> of being an atheist.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What do you think the word “atheist” means, if not that ?
>>>>>>>>> Don’t you even ken the meaning of the word ?
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Atheism: the lack of belief in a god.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Atheism is not the belief there is no god.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> I’m considering whether I’m an Aunicornist…..
>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have a lack of belief in unicorns. And I can’t prove they
>>>>>>> never existed, don’t exist and can never exist.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Aunicornism is not the belief there is no unicorn
>>>>>
>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>
>>>>> Problem…..
>>>>>
>>>>> Q: Should I demand all unicorn paraphernalia be banned from
>>>>> government?
>>>>> Should I demand that NO unicorn mythology be taught in school
>>>>> and ban
>>>>> any school songs, prayer, Tee Shirts, lunchboxes or writing with
>>>>> unicorns?
>>>>>
>>>>> simply because I choose to believe in pogo-sticks rather than
>>>>> unicorns?
>>>>>
>>>>> — Hide quoted text -
>>>>>
>>>>> – Show quoted text -
>>>>
>>>> Love the post.. i say if they can ban religion from schools, they
>>>> should be banning mythological stuff altogether..
>>>> To be honest, we should be Teaching our children about all about
>>>> religion, not just christianity or judaism or islam.. They’ve all
>>>> effected our history just as much as wars and revolutions, more so
>>>> even.. but yet, no religions are not discussed within school and
>>>> people left unaware and easily controled by what little they know of
>>>> them..
>>>>
>>>
>>> Public schools are allowed to teach courses about religion if no
>>> particular religion is favored or denigrated. This is why such
>>> courses are not seriously considered by elected school board
>>> officials.
>>>
>>
>> So spending money on religious symbols on government property is OK if
>> they are educational? Ain’t that a twist? What about tattoos of
>> religious symbols on people that work on government property? Or
>> Religious head scarfs on government workers on government property?
>>
>>> Public schools are prohibited from teaching religious beliefs as
>>> though they were scientific.
>>
>> Religions are Philosophy, not science. Atheism uses Darwin’s “Origin
>> of Species” as their Holy book.
>
>
> What is your Holy book?
>
>
>>
>> Darwin is a Philosophy/Religion since you can’t link it to the
>> beginning of life to complete the “evolution” picture.
>
>
> What a toweringly stupid think to say.

Why is the Bible stupid? Because you can’t prove God created the world?

>> How do Atheists who preach evolution, explain the beginning of LIFE,
>> was it an accident in a mud puddle?
>> If so then why hasn’t that same accident happened over and
>> over creating new DNA life forms with strange alternative DNA? The
>> shear numbers of random life being created must mean that billions of
>> life forms were created before one was created that could
>> reproduce(you don’t create complex reproducing DNA the first time
>> out), so NEW DNA different from life forms that can reproduce must be
>> created on a daily basis somewhere on the planet. No one has ever dug
>> up a single one of those Billions and billions of life forms that
>> can’t reproduce? Why is that?
>
>
> What is your explanation?

I don’t have one, but the lack of evidence tells me that the mud puddle
explanation is weak…..

The numbers don’t make sense, 3.5 Billion years and the (life)lottery
only hit once, and it has been running constantly all that time? Why?

And apparently the dice only rolled once since we can’t find any failed
DNA or NON reproducing DNA.

There must be something else at work.