Atheism isn’t an Absence in belief

On 8/27/2010 3:40 PM, Colanth wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:22:20 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty
> @&*$?%Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote:
>
>> On 8/27/2010 1:59 PM, DanielSan wrote:
>>> On 8/27/2010 9:25 AM, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:
>
>>>> You take positive actions to declare your lack of belief?
>
>>> Only when asked.
>
>> The ten commandments in a government building…..
>
> Violation of law.
“Congress shall make no law”

What law did it violate?

>> Prayer at a foot ball game…..
>
> By members of the audience, praying that their team wins? Yawn.
>
> Led by or actively sanctioned by employees of the government
> (teachers) at a football game run by the government (a school) on
> government property (the school stadium)? Violation of law.
>

Private people on government property.

Who cares if Muslims pray on government property, I never heard a
Christian say other religions couldn’t pray? I “have” heard Atheists say
that.

>> A cross in a Park…..
>
> A private park? Yawn.
>
> A public (owned by the government)? Violation of law.

A public park(government) is owned by the Christians and the Jews and
the Muslims…. ONLY ATHEISTS MAKE A STINK ABOUT A CROSS.

>
>> Darwinism in schools
>
> As stupid as teaching kids how to properly use button hooks.

IT REPLACED ALL RELIGION, even though they can’t produce the FACTS on
how life began and why new life isn’t created with new DNA structure
every day, or even why no one ever dug up any of the billions of NEWLY
CREATED life over our 3.5 billion years that had DNA that was unable to
reproduce, or any new ones since “our reproducing” DNA was created. It’s
taught as if only one accident in a mud puddle could ever happen….

>> while banning religions.
>
> Religion can be taught in the public schools – and is. Many high
> schools (and most colleges) have Comparative Religion courses. ALL
> schools teach about religion, as it relates to history.
>
> But, since religion is not science, it shouldn’t be taught in science
> classrooms. Neither should history, English, economics …

neither should Darwinism, Global Warming, Atheism or human sex….?

And yet Science class is being perverted into Socialism(economics) like
Global Warming that again has zero fact(like Darwinism) that prove it,
religion is taught when Science teaches sexual behavior and that only
sex without a condom is bad…. while religion once taught when sex was
bad, what’s the difference. Is Atheist sex better than Theist sex?

Both seem to have ended up using different methods to the same ends,
don’t have sex that gives you disease or gets you pregnant until you are
ready.

The only difference being Marriage and one partner. Now the school
teached them to have sex before marriage and with multiple partners
before and after marriage, just use a condom.