Harry Dope, Your Favorite Retard, Eats Shit Again!!

On 8/16/2010 2:29 PM, The PHANTOM wrote:
> On Aug 16, 12:28 pm, NotU wrote:
>> On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:02:17 -0700, The PHANTOM wrote:
>>> On Aug 15, 10:00 pm, NotU wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 23:05:15 +0200, Nomen Nescio wrote:
>>>>> How Do Those Teabags Taste Now, Harry?
>>>>> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA AP: ” Independents who
>>>>> embraced President Barack Obama’s call for change in 2008 are ready
>>>>> for a shift again, and that’s worrisome news for Democrats”
>>>>> http://apnews.myway.com/article/20100815/D9HJUCK80.htmlWASHINGTON(AP)
>>>>> – Independents who embraced President Barack Obama’s call for change
>>>>> in 2008 are ready for a shift again, and that’s worrisome news for
>>>>> Democrats. Only 32 percent of those citing no allegiance to either
>>>>> major party say they want Democrats to keep control of Congress in
>>>>> this November’s elections, according to combined results of recent
>>>>> Associated Press-GfK polls. That’s way down from the 52 percent of
>>>>> independents who backed Obama over Republican Sen. John McCain two
>>>>> years ago, and the 49 percent to 41 percent edge by which they
>>>>> preferred Democratic candidates for the House in that election,
>>>>> according to exit polls of voters. Independents voice especially
>>>>> strong concerns about the economy, with 9 in 10 calling it a top
>>>>> problem and no other issue coming close, the analysis of the AP-GfK
>>>>> polls shows. While Democrats and Republicans rank the economy the No.
>>>>> 1 problem in similar numbers, they are nearly as worried about their
>>>>> No. 2 issues, health care for Democrats and terrorism for
>>>>> Republicans. Ominously for Democrats, independents trust Republicans
>>>>> more on the economy by a modest but telling 42 percent to 36 percent.
>>>>> That’s bad news for the party that controls the White House and
>>>>> Congress at a time of near 10 percent unemployment and the slow
>>>>> economic recovery. “People are just struggling, they need a job but
>>>>> there’s nowhere to get a job,” said independent Leilani Buxman, 55,
>>>>> of Greeley, Colo. Of Obama, she said, “It seems like he talks but he
>>>>> doesn’t do anything about it.” Both parties court independents for
>>>>> obvious reasons. Besides their sheer number – 4 in 10 describe
>>>>> themselves as independents in combined AP-GfK polling for April, May
>>>>> and June – they are a crucial swing group. To try winning them over,
>>>>> Republicans say they will contrast Obama’s campaign promises of
>>>>> change with the huge spending programs he’s approved. Democrats say
>>>>> they will warn independents that a GOP victory will revive that
>>>>> party’s efforts to cut taxes for the rich and transform Social
>>>>> Security into risky private investment accounts. Targeting
>>>>> independents is tricky, though, because the makeup of independents
>>>>> evolves over time. Their numbers have swollen from 3 in 10 two years
>>>>> ago, due partly to the weakened political loyalties that typify years
>>>>> without presidential elections. While some are conservatives
>>>>> dissatisfied with Republicans, similar numbers are disillusioned
>>>>> Democrats, underscoring a frustration with the party in power often
>>>>> seen when the economy is bad. Reflecting these conflicting dynamics,
>>>>> today’s independents are likelier to be minorities, conservatives,
>>>>> less educated, lower paid and from rural areas than they were in
>>>>> 2008. Sixty-seven percent think the country is heading in the wrong
>>>>> direction, compared with 59 percent of all voters who think so. “Why
>>>>> not stop bickering and do something. Pull together,” said Chip A.
>>>>> Hoeye, 54, of Fort Atkinson, Wis., an independent and Obama voter who
>>>>> says he doesn’t care which party controls Congress because of their
>>>>> constant battling. Independents trust Republicans far more than
>>>>> Democrats for handling national security, but give Democrats a 42
>>>>> percent to 36 percent edge for dealing with health care – a potential
>>>>> sign that distrust over Obama’s signature issue is receding. Hope is
>>>>> not lost for Democrats.
>>>>> The AP-GfK polls show a narrow 44 percent to 41 percent overall
>>>>> preference for a Democratic Congress. The party is holding its 2008
>>>>> edge among women and urban residents, and still splitting the vote of
>>>>> pivotal suburbanites and people earning $50,000 to $100,000. But less
>>>>> than three months from Election Day, independents aren’t the only
>>>>> part of Obama’s 2008 coalition that shows waning enthusiasm for a
>>>>> Democratic-controlled Congress. Other groups that supported Obama but
>>>>> show less fervor include young whites, unmarried women, people who
>>>>> live in the West, people earning under $50,000 a year, college
>>>>> graduates and urban whites. The falloff shows that Democrats have
>>>>> work to do with blocs the party hoped an Obama presidency would
>>>>> cement into dependable supporters. There’s even erosion among
>>>>> minorities. While 8 in 10 voted for Obama, fewer than two-thirds want
>>>>> a Democratic Congress, and 1 in 9 don’t care which party controls.
>>>>> Democrats are also losing further ground with GOP-leaning groups such
>>>>> as white men, married men and people earning over $100,000 a year.
>>>>> Ebbing support for Democrats, compared with the vote for Obama,
>>>>> partly reflects that a president’s popularity doesn’t necessarily
>>>>> help his party in Congress. It also comes as Obama’s own image has
>>>>> suffered: 49 percent approve of his job performance in the AP-GfK
>>>>> polls, compared with 67 percent who approved in February 2009, days
>>>>> after he took office. The data from the AP-GfK polls combines surveys
>>>>> conducted June 9-14, May 7-11 and April 7-12 by GfK Roper Public
>>>>> Affairs & Media. A total of 3,047 randomly chosen adults were
>>>>> interviewed by cell and landline telephone. The margin of sampling
>>>>> error is plus or minus 2.4 percentage points. The exit poll for the
>>>>> November 2008 presidential election was conducted by Edison Media
>>>>> Research and Mitofsky International for the AP and television
>>>>> networks in 300 precincts nationally. The data was based on 17,836
>>>>> voters, including telephone polling of 2,407 people who voted early,
>>>>> and has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 1 percentage
>>>>> point.
>>
>>>> Only FAUX and the GOP would *think* that someone who voted for change
>>>> would go back and vote against change. but thats why they call the
>>>> stupid ‘tea baggers’!- Hide quoted text -
>>
>>>> – Show quoted text -
>>
>>> So you voted for “fundamental transformation of the United States”??
>>> Btw,the vast majority of Obama voters voted for him because of the color
>>> of his skin. Plus they were promised a “check” and redistribution of the
>>> white man’s wealth. But,here it is almost two years into Immam Obama’s
>>> rule and the vast majority of negras and white crackheads are STILL
>>> paying their own rent,buying their own gas and STILL making their own
>>> car note. What an utter dissappointment !!!
>>
>> same faux news montra over and over
>> think for yourself dipshit- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> – Show quoted text -
>
> “Mantra”?? Did Obama NOT say he wanted to “Fundamentally transform
> America”? Yes?? Then what does he mean by that? No? Then you need to
> visit George Soros’s Facebook page and hear what he said.

Obama needed to be “perfectly clear” when he voiced that, he should have
said he will fundamentally change America by fundamentally changing the
constitution.

The good old days of having individual rights will be changed and you
will only have collective rights and most rights will belong to the
government.