on July 22, 2010 by admin in Constitution, Federal Government, Uncategorized, Comments (8)
Gulf coast fisherman may be on welfare when they retire
On 7/22/2010 2:09 PM, Bret Cahill wrote:
>
>>>>> A lot of the fisherman aren’t paying income tax and it is also unlikely
>>>>> that they are paying the FICA payroll tax.
>>
>>>>> When these tax scoflaws reach retirement aid, they will probably have to
>>>>> use Medicaid for medical care and get food stamps to eat. The government
>>>>> will provide them with about $600 a month to live on because they don’t
>>>>> meet the 40 quarters Social Security and Medicare part A requirement.
>>
>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/2ccoc8c
>>>>> _ _ _
>>
>>>>> ?Rightardia: The progressive alternative to conservative fascism. Slow
>>>>> thinkers keep right.
>>
>>>> EXACTLY where the Obama regime wants them !! The more people receiving
>>>> gubmint cheese the more votes for the progressive !!
>>
>>> As usual you are completely missing the point that the fisherman aren’t
>>> paying income tax or FICA. When they retire, they won’t be eligible for
>>> Medicare and will only receive a minimal Social Security payment.
>>
>>> It’s their own fault, not Obama’s. BP won’t pay them either because they
>>> are unable to document their income.
>>
>>> Many of the gulf fisherman are tax scofflaws. I have no sympathy for them.
>>
>> I just relaized because some of the fisherman are not paying any payroll
>> taxes, they aren’t even eligible for unemployment. Working people need
>> to rethink tax avoidance and tax evasion.
>
> Working people are over taxed is because the rich aren’t paying their
> fair share.
>
>
> Bret Cahill
The #Working People are over taxes by States and Local and federal sin
taxes and #taxes on their investments, while the #Federal-Government over
taxes the #Wealthy on their income…..
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 23, 2010 @ 12:50 pm
Then Corporate income tax is regressive also, since the tax comes from
the people buying the products…… also it hurts the stock holders
that own the company and pay a tax when the corporation earns profit and
the the owner pays tax again when the dividend/profit is distributed to
stock holder/owners.
Liberals have long said that Corporate income tax hurts the rich
corporations, Liberals say it’s good to tax corporations.
And yet we *NOW* hear that taxes are passed on to the poor!
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 23, 2010 @ 12:36 pm
While that “Art. I, Sec. 8, U. S. Const./Amendment 16″ may say they can
tax from whatever *income* , it *NEVER* says the Congress can *SPEND*
on what ever they want.
So the fair share can be collected but can’t be redistributed.
They still have to *spend* the way the constitution demands. If it’s not
written in the constitution it’s not a power of Federal Government.
“Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor
prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively,
or to the people.”
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 23, 2010 @ 1:12 pm
Taxes on the rich are passed on to the poor… didn’t “you Liberals”
just say that?
Property tax is passed on to the poor renters!!!!
If true then Corporate tax is also passed to their customers.
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 23, 2010 @ 1:24 pm
Taxes on the rich are passed on to the poor… didn’t “you Liberals”
just say that?
Property tax is passed on to the poor renters!!!!
If true then Corporate tax is also passed to their customers.
Corporate tax “is” VAT tax.
Obama wants to place a VAT tax on corporations that are already taxed
and we pay what already is a VAT tax….
Obama wants to place a VAT^2 on the American People.
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 23, 2010 @ 3:49 pm
“can and do ELECT #REPRESENTATIVES” *to follow the CONSTITUTION*
The constitution doesn’t give congress the #power to ignore the
constitution because they were voted into office.
The #Constitution is “Their Law” as well as The Peoples Laws.
Where did you learn that voting, superseded the constitution? Was that
in a Government school?
“AS THE PEOPLE SO DESIRE” is no where to be found in the Constitution
from which all Federal power is derived.
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 23, 2010 @ 4:19 pm
The stock holder is hurt by the tax, only in so much as their stock
“value” is less as your earnings relative to tax is lower…. Like
inflation hurts the rich. You have to buy more shares to make the same
money. It makes the stock less appealing and the stockholder would look
for better investments. Not that they lose money due to the TAX since
the tax is taken from the earnings which were Toaster profits paid by
the consumer to start with.
What I pointed out was that the corporation and the stock/owner pay
taxes that are originally in the cost of the toaster you purchased. You
are paying the tax for the corporation and a tax also for the
stock/owner so I guess you got me, it is really a VAT^3 when Obama adds
in the energy VAT.
There will be three taxes that will be passed down to the person buying
a toaster, one will be the *energy ” VAT^3 “* for producing the toaster,
one will be on the *Corporate profit”VAT^2 called income tax”* on the
toaster and the last will be the *Dividend tax ” VAT^1 “* on the stock
owner that was also paid by the purchaser of the toaster.
HOW????????
Tax on the front end or back end, the person that buys the toaster pays
the tax.
The “rich” guy or corporation just raises the price and lowers quality
to compensate for revenue lost to taxes. If they didn’t they would soon
have zero profit. Zero profit means no investors.
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 24, 2010 @ 8:44 pm
That is why Obama is attacking them.
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 25, 2010 @ 1:58 pm
Tea Party.