on June 28, 2010 by admin in GOVERNMENT, money, Tea Party, Uncategorized, wealth, Comments (30)
50% Of Voters Have Unfavorable View Of Tea Party
On 6/28/2010 7:20 PM, @&*$?%tweet.net">Northup @&*$?%tweet.net wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 08:52:36 -1000, “ J&*$?%a”
> wrote:
>
>>> There was NEVER a cost to the wealthy—-and because the THEORY simply
>>> does not self-generate—-the wealthy merely KEPT the money.
>>>
>>
>> Are you saying that increasing taxes on the Wealthy does no good at all?
>
> I’m saying the policy of DEcreasing the taxes on the wealth class,
> coupled with deregulation and flawed #Economic policy caused the
> eventual collapse.
So that means that government caused this collapse? And you want the
people that cause the collapse to fix it?
Tags: Juris Diction, NPR, WATER, Working
Beam Me Up Scotty
June 29, 2010 @ 12:45 pm
On 6/29/2010 12:01 PM, @&*$?%tweet.net"> @&*$?%tweet.net">Northup @&*$?%tweet.net wrote:
Government created *NOT* lack of government and you say the Republicans
want to deregulate…..
So… since Progressives want MORE government and more control, you
just admitted that more government and therefore more Progressives is
the Problem.
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 4, 2010 @ 10:55 am
On 7/4/2010 11:47 AM, @&*$?%tweet.net"> @&*$?%tweet.net">Northup @&*$?%tweet.net wrote:
The environment goes from sleeper cells to target rich.
That would be an excellent way to kill terrorists.
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 4, 2010 @ 11:00 am
On 7/4/2010 11:47 AM, @&*$?%tweet.net"> @&*$?%tweet.net">Northup @&*$?%tweet.net wrote:
When private citizens pick up arms and start fighting, we call it war…
Wasn’t that what we were fighting? You seem to think that we wanted to
fight a war against no one.
Didn’t the people of the South pick up guns and fight after the north
decided to attack? What you’re saying is the NORTH WAS WRONG to attack
the south.
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 4, 2010 @ 1:10 pm
Obama’s plan was self destructive as he wants to spread the wealth and
he also wants to tax only the wealthy, HOW DO YOU TAX ONLY THE WEALTHY
WHEN THERE ARE FEWER AND FEWER WEALTHY SINCE THEIR WEALTH WAS SPREAD
AROUND?
The end story is that Obama wants to destroy the tax base that supports
his BIG GOVERNMENT. That is a self destructive policy.
That whole plan triggered the wealthy to quit exposing their money
because when exposed you risk that Obama will see it and come after it.
This Depression is all Obama’s, he took a recession and made it worse.
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 4, 2010 @ 1:30 pm
In 2006, Congress increased the penalty for frivolous tax returns from
$500 to $5,000. The increased penalty amount applies when a person
submits a tax return or other specified submission, and any portion of
the submission is based on a position the IRS identifies as frivolous.
In 1992 alone, the IRS seized 3,253,000 paychecks, bank accounts, cars
and homes without trial.
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 4, 2010 @ 10:05 pm
Since you were a human failure in life you need to steal money from
others to allow you to feel important and successful.
Like most all the grunt Socialists… your failure has been exploited by
the the omnipotent, special, elite socialists that call themselves
Progressives.
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 5, 2010 @ 1:25 pm
Only government “TAKES” my money all others compete to get any money
that I choose to spend.
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 5, 2010 @ 1:59 pm
On 7/5/2010 12:46 AM, @&*$?%tweet.net"> @&*$?%tweet.net">Northup @&*$?%tweet.net wrote:
The south asked the North to leave the south and the North ignored it
and they were convinced that they were NOT legally on the soil of the
sovereign confederate states, after the South bombarded the fort they
were hiding in.
The South didn’t attack the NORTH the South attacked the Military of the
North *on the soil of the South* ! Generally when a foreign military
is on your soil and you chase them out…. it’s the one on the foreign
soil that is attacking.
The North was forcing the issue by not pulling their army back to their
territory. The North was on the foreign soil.
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 5, 2010 @ 8:43 pm
On 7/5/2010 5:09 PM, @&*$?%tweet.net"> @&*$?%tweet.net">Northup @&*$?%tweet.net wrote:
href=”mailto:Northup @&*$?%tweet.net”> @&*$?%tweet.net">Northup @&*$?%tweet.net wrote:
Declaration of Independence
IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people
to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another,
and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal
station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a
decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should
declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 5, 2010 @ 8:50 pm
On 7/5/2010 5:07 PM, @&*$?%tweet.net"> @&*$?%tweet.net">Northup @&*$?%tweet.net wrote:
As you like to point out, it is “progressive” and that means that 50% is
50% no matter the amount(to hear you tell it)….. first you Leftists
say the rich need to pay more because they enjoyed more success. NOW you
say that his 50% is more than my 50%, why do you count it as *equal*
until you want to try to insult me, suddenly you realize that the rich
guy is paying more and it isn’t FAIR.
You Socialists betray your own greed time after time.
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 6, 2010 @ 12:45 pm
On 7/6/2010 12:34 AM, @&*$?%tweet.net"> @&*$?%tweet.net">Northup @&*$?%tweet.net wrote:
And you know this, how? I know that slavery was waning when the war
began and fewer people were slave owners and 50 years later, the machine
age began with cars, tractors and “cotton gins” and other machines that
would have made slaves more of a liability rather than an asset.
Yet was constitutional, and rather than changing the constitution the
NORTH declared war. Secession is what the…
………………………………….
“Declaration of Independence
IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people
to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another,
and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal
station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a
decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should
declare the causes which impel them to the separation.”
………………………………
…Declaration of Independence says and the constitution backs them up,
so in essence the NORTH was withdrawing from the UNION and the
Constitution that allowed Slavery and you support it by saying that the
NORTH was Morally correct. That’s fine and the NORTH/Union had every
right to leave the “real UNION” , in the end the NORTH won the war and
Adopted the Constitution as the NEW document with the amendment that
slavery was NOT constitutional and that Amendment 10 would be ignored at
the will of the Federal Government.
Then while losing the war, the North used the slaves as pawns to create
confusion and dissent in the South. The north freed the slaves after
the war was well under way, why is that?
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 6, 2010 @ 1:15 pm
I offer less than the ticket price all the time, I get better response
at places that don’t hire teenager idiots since they have no interest or
power in making money. Hotels are a good place to try it.
And you used my unemployment records for that burst of genius? I have
never had a dime from unemployment and I even pay into that one.
NO… it makes you a LIAR.
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 6, 2010 @ 1:16 pm
Their mistake…..
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 6, 2010 @ 3:29 pm
On 7/6/2010 3:52 PM, @&*$?%tweet.net"> @&*$?%tweet.net">Northup @&*$?%tweet.net wrote:
href=”mailto:Northup @&*$?%tweet.net”> @&*$?%tweet.net">Northup @&*$?%tweet.net wrote:
The #Living #Constitution is a Mythical beast that Socialist believe
in…. There is “NO SUCH THING”
The only two ways I know of that the Constitution can change is an
amendment either by the States or by Congress. Anything more is a Fairy
Tale that #Leftists tell school children in #GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS.
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 7, 2010 @ 10:58 am
On 7/7/2010 12:58 AM, @&*$?%tweet.net"> @&*$?%tweet.net">Northup @&*$?%tweet.net wrote:
*addendum*
I’ll go farther and say that most *beasts of burden* went out when OIL
and gas and combustion engines came in, for instance we quit using
horses for most things and started using the “more” productive machines.
And I can go farther to tell you that the Progressives that want to
drive up oil costs and limit the use of combustion engines will bring
back *SLAVERY* in many corners of the world when the oil is more
expensive than using beasts of burden.
Slavery still exists and Obama(Progressives) wants to keep it going by
allowing the Slaves to be smuggled across the Arizona Border, many are
*SEX_SLAVES* and the others work for so little money that they need to
get government food/cheese and medical care, like a SLAVE relies on
their MASTER to take care of them because they don’t have the money from
their work to care for them selves….. The reason they have too
little money from too little pay is that Obama allows them to be
smuggled into America in the first place.
Obama(Progressives) say *guns* are bad to smuggle, *SLAVES* are good to
smuggle.
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 8, 2010 @ 10:30 am
Satire, Sarcasm and the comedy theater aren’t your fort`e are they?
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 9, 2010 @ 4:31 pm
As in Obama’s “deficit neutral” health care plan that we find out now
will cost us a lot of money and Obama lied!
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 9, 2010 @ 5:22 pm
On 7/9/2010 6:12 PM, @&*$?%tweet.net"> @&*$?%tweet.net">Northup @&*$?%tweet.net wrote:
The inspections would have been complete had there been no WMD.
The UN was milking the USA for money and power by continuing the WMD
inspections or they were genuinely expecting that Saddam had WMD….
Nope this guy has you….
Your choice is the UN is corrupt and/or Saddam was believed to have WMD.
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 13, 2010 @ 2:10 pm
When “you” place people in the field of battle, you have made those
people combatants.
That is why terrorism which makes the field of Battle amongst non
combatants, are sick perverted individuals and NOT due any respect or
quarter…. (10 : merciful consideration of an opponent; specifically :
the clemency of not killing a defeated enemy) ….under the UN rules of
war or our constitution.
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 14, 2010 @ 6:44 pm
NATO is NO longer a Defense pact…… it has become a mercenary army.
NATO is not only out dated but it’s also incompetent.
Only the USA was in Iraq, NATO was in Afghanistan.
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 14, 2010 @ 7:14 pm
Clinton was the first to do a pre-war war monger strike….. Clinton
said that him attacking in the middle of the Kosovo/Bosnia internal
conflicts would prevent war from spreading throughout Europe.
Much like Bush said flattening Saddam’s WMD would save us from the
coming attack from Saddam’s growing boldness.
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 15, 2010 @ 2:01 pm
You choose to look at who was in power I was talking about who
*supports* the Leftist genocide movement and they are Leftists and they
still idolize Che and Mao and Stalin….. Leftists love their killers.
Why do you support killing, but only when you Leftists agree with it.
As in it’s OK to kill people that don’t agree with “you” someone that
want’s to kill capitalists, well that’s OK and you understand that.
Yet killing someone that might agree with your plan to end capitalism is
somehow Genocide and repugnant.
Leftists don’t call 9/11 repugnant genocide worthy of retaliation.
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 15, 2010 @ 1:22 pm
Suddenly Leftists are Moral? Well….. between b&*$?%s from their
interns, they are moral.
And yet Leftists in America let Pol Pot kill millions and Stalin and Mao
and Che and Leftists applaud them for their repugnant genocide.
Care to clear up the Leftists dichotomy with repugnant genocide only
applying to killing for reasons other than Leftists reasons?
Saddam had killed with Chemical weapons, but that was NOT repugnant
Genocide worthy of intervening?
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 16, 2010 @ 2:48 pm
Who hits who over the head with it, when they suggest morality is
“pertinent”?
Should we use God’s morality or Chairman Mao’s morality?
Why should “we” kill on either side, is it moral to decide that immoral
people should die rather than the moral people?
Why do moral people deserve life more?
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 17, 2010 @ 2:37 pm
And who chooses?
Morality is against Nature?
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 20, 2010 @ 5:55 pm
Abraham Lincoln committed crimes against humanity?
So burning the food and starving and killing “the people” in the South
was a war crime….. will General Sherman and Lincoln be posthumously
convicted?
The South NEVER committed that sort of Starvation and Genocide against
the Slaves they had.
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 21, 2010 @ 1:37 pm
I never owned a slave and they were legal when those people did, yet I’m
expected to pay reparations…..
If I can be held accountable for slavery then Lincoln can be held
accountable for “crimes against humanity” that is if you are being
consistent in your legal system and history.
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 23, 2010 @ 1:29 pm
Under Obama? The Assassin in Chief?
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 24, 2010 @ 1:52 pm
Speaking of Immoral Acts Obama also supports abortion, he needs to put
some lipstick on that pig.
Beam Me Up Scotty
July 24, 2010 @ 8:54 pm
On 7/24/2010 3:59 PM, @&*$?%Nov.com"> @&*$?%Nov.com">GOP-LOSER @&*$?%Nov.com wrote:
A life has the SAME rights as “a life”, is Steven Hawking a Blob….? He
is certainly less of “a life” or more of a blob than I am. Just how many
cell divisions does it take for a blob to be human life? Or is a blob
something that can’t walk, speak or pick their nose like Hawking?