Re: Republicans Don’t Like Folks Who Lost Their Jobs In The Bush

On 6/22/2010 9:32 AM, Sid9 wrote:
>
> “ H&*$?%e” wrote in message
> news:91e126thmsi53g2n77hfrhronk86rcffak @&*$?%4ax.com…
>> June 22, 2010
>>
>> REPUBLICANS JUST DON’T LIKE THE UNEMPLOYED, CONT’D….
>>
>> The evidence continues to pile up to suggest Republican lawmakers and
>> candidates actively dislike — on a personal level — those who’ve
>> lost their jobs in the recession.
>>
>> It’s been remarkable to watch this unfold of late.
>>
>> One GOP congressman recently compared the unemployed to “hobos.”
>> http://thinkprogress.org/2010/02/25/gop-rep-hobo/
>>
>> Several Republicans have blocked extended benefits for the unemployed.
>> http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_04/023316.php
>>
>> In the House, GOP lawmakers tried to eliminate a successful jobs
>> program.
>> http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_05/023897.php
>>
>> Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) actually started pushing a measure to
>> require the unemployed to take mandatory drug tests in exchange for
>> benefits.
>> http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_06/024278.php
>>
>> And now Republican Senate candidate Rand Paul, in his infinite wisdom,
>> wants the jobless to quit their bellyaching and “get back to work.”
>>
>> Kentucky Republican Senate candidate Rand Paul has a blunt message for
>> the millions of Americans who remain unemployed in the long-term:
>>
>> “Accept a wage that’s less than [you] had at [your] previous job” and
>> “get back to work.”
>> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/21/rand-paul-to-unemployed-t_n_619793.html
>>
>>
>>
>> According to Paul, the issue is “bigger than unemployment benefits”
>> and the Tea Party-backed Senate hopeful made his position on the
>> matter clear in an interview with talk radio host Sue Wylie on WVLK-AM
>> last week.
>>
>> “As bad as it sounds, ultimately we do have to sometimes accept a wage
>> that’s less than we had at our previous job in order to get back to
>> work and allow the economy to get started again,” Paul explained.
>>
>> “Nobody likes that, but it may be one of the tough love things that
>> has to happen.”
>>
>>
>> It occurs to me that, as bad as it sounds, ultimately someone has to
>> tell Rand Paul to accept the fact that he’s a bit of a nutjob.
>>
>> Nobody likes that, but it may be one of the tough love things that has
>> to happen.
>>
>> Honestly, does this guy have any idea what the job market is like
>> right now?
>>
>> Does he understand the ratio of applicants to openings?
>>
>> Can he appreciate what happens to a struggling family, that’s
>> desperate to get back on track, that loses meager unemployment
>> benefits?
>>
>> For the record, at 10.4%, Kentucky has one of the higher unemployment
>> rates in the country. http://www.bls.gov/web/laus/laumstrk.htm
>>
>> One wonders if the state’s jobless intend to vote in November.
>>
>> And in the larger sense, I continue to marvel at the Republican
>> Party’s fundamental dislike of the unemployed.
>>
>> It’s almost as if the GOP finds the jobless personally offensive.
>>
>> _____________________________________________________
>>
>> It’s obvious what’s goin’ on. The RePIGs don’t like their s&*$?%y
>> messes rubbed in their faces.
>>
>> Harry
> .
> .
> “The Grapes of Wrath”…….needs to be revised for the 21st Century

Only this time, it needs to show how the Socialism in control now is
creating Chaos, anarchy and leading to no jobs and the coming starvation
of people.

Odd that Cuba is known for starving, USSR was known for starving,
Peoples Republic of China was known for starving and Hugo Chavez(the new
socialist on the block) is now messing with the food supply and creating
shortages and waste and incompetence in the food supply. In the end it’s
the Socialists that create starvation and chaos whereas the “Grapes of
Wrath” was directed at showing the Capitalists as evil when in fact the
“Dust bowl” created the exodus.

Socialists starve people, with incompetence and ignorance and pure
meanness for the purposes of controlling people.

Capitalists want people with money and healthy to be customers….
Socialists don’t need people for anything but useful idiots and only
enough of them to make it easy to control.

Socialists always end up killing off part of the population to get it to
that point where they can more easily control them when the Socialists
can’t supply their basic needs.