Re: So-Called “Tea Party” is Nothing But a Front for the Corporate

On 6/20/2010 12:41 PM, Sid9 wrote:
>
> “Beam Me Up Scotty”
> wrote in message news:4C1E4190.2050901 @&*$?%Blackhole.NebulaX.com…
>> On 6/20/2010 2:36 AM, C&*$?%r wrote:
>>> In article ,
>>> Neolibertarian wrote:
>>>
>>>>> That “anti-big government” sentiment has since remained the Republican
>>>>> mantra.
>>>>
>>>> The /conservative/ mantra.
>>>
>>> That only makes sense if you don’t believe the Department of Defence
>>> is part of
>>> the government. When you include DoD, Republicans always demand a
>>> bigger and
>>> more expensive government.
>>>
>>>>> Government inspectors were intruders; storm -troopers; “socialists who
>>>>> think ‘profit’ is a dirty word,” as Reagan said. Unions were demonized
>>>>> for increasing costs.
>>>>
>>>> Not nearly enough, evidently.
>>>
>>> You don’t really agree with free markets if labour is not free to
>>> organise for
>>> its best advantage.
>>>
>>>> BTW, there’s no policy ever conceived of by modern man more utterly
>>>> stupid, or so fundamentally illogical than the idea of raising the
>>>> “minimum wage.”
>>>
>>> Given all the government does to restrict the movement, organisation,
>>> and hiring
>>> of labour, a minimum wage is the smallest crumb the government can give.
>>>
>>>>> OSHA was a popular whipping boy as businesses blamed safety
>>>>> regulations for increasing expenses.
>>>>
>>>> Insurance companies would do a far better job. However, why should they
>>>
>>> It depends on your definition of ‘better job.’ The goal of the
>>> insurer is to
>>> ensure payouts to customers, not to minimise damage to customer assets.
>>>
>>>> You hate capitalism because you don’t believe you should be free.
>>>
>>> It’s a biological fact that humans are strongest when they join into
>>> cooperatives, such as business corporations. Republicans are
>>> dedicated to
>>> destroying cooperatives that would more evenly distribute profits.
>>
>>
>>
>> The constitution delegates power for the Federal Government(Congress) to
>> pay for Defence……
>>
>> Also tha constitution gives the Federal Government(Congress) ZERO power
>> to pay for education, health care….. or many more things they are
>> doing, that would mean it’s NOT Defence that is too expensive, it’s all
>> the Spending on things *NOT* authorized in the Constitution that caused
>> the Deficit spending.
>>
>> Cut the items the Congress has been given ZERO power to spend on, and
>> you might have a balanced budget.
>>
>> But you can’t waste money on “Unicorn Ranches” and then say that it was
>> all that spending on Defence that created the Deficit. It’s the
>> Spending on the Unicorn Ranches that’s causing the Deficits.
>>
>> You Socialists don’t understand prioritizing your budget or
>> Constitutional powers or the lack of that power. If it isn’t a power
>> given to the Federal government *BY THE CONSTITUTION* then they have
>> zero power to pass any laws or funding for it.
>>
>> All you need to do is add the power you think the Feds need to the
>> Constitution. It’s just that easy.
>>
>>
>>
> .
> .
> People with brains have decided what the constitution means.
>
> America is lucky that you have no say in those decisions.

You don’t just “decide” what a law/power means, what is written is what
it means. The rest is an opinion and there are NO opinion in the
constitution but there are WRITTEN Amendments.