Re: Global Warming – polar ice disappearing>>or<<Your story begins

On 6/13/2010 1:08 PM, K&*$?%m wrote:
> On Jun 13, 12:05 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty Everyth…@Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote:
>> On 6/13/2010 11:38 AM, Transition Zone wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> H&*$?%e wrote:
>>
>>> By Tudor Vieru, Science Editor
>>
>>> June 12th, 2010
>>
>>> It’s no longer a secret to anyone that the extent of the multi-year
>>> ice sheets in the Arctic is rapidly declining.
>>
>>> At this point, there are several predictions as to when the North
>>> Pole
>>> will become completely clear of ice during the summer months, but
>>> none
>>> of them is too encouraging.
>>
>>> Unlike Antarctica, which is based on ground, the Arctic is made up
>>> entirely of floating ice, and one of the main reasons why it’s
>>> melting
>>> other than global climate change is the fact that the ocean
>>> underneath is warming.
>>
>>> But researchers say the true extent of ice loss is still unknown,
>>> AlphaGalileo reports.
>>> http://www.alphagalileo.org/ViewItem.aspx?ItemId=78437&CultureCode=en
>>
>>> Over the past couple of years, the estimates of when the ice covering
>>> the North Pole will disappear have been reducing constantly.
>>
>>> Dr. David Barbers explained why in new conference, which took place
>>> yesterday, June 11.
>>
>>> The expert was the leader of one of the most important research
>>> initiatives carried out under the International Polar Year (IPY) flag
>>> The Circumpolar Flaw Lead (CFL) system study.
>>
>>> The team that conducted the investigation featured more than 370
>>> members from 27 countries.
>>
>>> The status of multi-year ice was the main goal of the study.
>>
>>> Scientists spend a lot of energy discussing the squiggly line
>>> generated for satellite data on sea ice extent. But the extent does
>>> not reflect the real condition of the sea ice. I think we are all
>>> looking forward to getting reliable data on the thickness from
>>> Cryosat. Because what really counts is the condition and thickness of
>>> the multi-year ice. Even though the extent of the ice went up, both
>>> winter maximum and summer minimum, in 2008 and 2009, the amount of
>>> multi-year ice continued to decline rapidly, he explained.
>>
>>> The expert added that the North Pole lost over 2.5 million square
>>> kilometers of ice over the past three decades, which is the
>>> equivalent
>>> of 70,000 square kilometers per year.
>>
>>> Last summer we studied sea ice recovery in the Southern Beaufort Sea
>>> aboard the research vessel Amundsen. We expected to be stopped by
>>> thick multi-year ice, but the Amundsen, ice classed to make it
>>> through
>>> 1,2 meters of ice, was not stopped. We realized that the ice was
>>> rotten. We also observed that thaw pools were formed on top of the
>>> ice, gradually melting through the multi-year ice. This process left
>>> the multi-year ice as floating lumps. When the freeze started, what
>>> looked like solid ice, was really the lumps with a 5 [centimeters]
>>> thin ice layer on top. This ice was mistaken by the radar for
>>> multi-year ice, the scientist revealed at the meeting.
>>
>> You are suggesting a great flood of Biblical proportions?
>>
>> Or you finally realized your LIE about the ARCTIC melting was debunked,
>> when you couldn’t explain where the water went. Now you moved the lie
>> to the South pole and FLOATING ice so the lie will be a better scam and
>> it takes away the the facts that prove you are a liar. The odds of all
>> your excuses for Sea Levels NOT rising shows real imagination.
>>
>> A total of 21 feet according to you “True Believers” If the ice is gone
>> or 50% of it is water then 11 ft, where is it now? You moved your scam
>> from Polar Bears to Penguins to try to keep the scam running… but
>> where’s the Glacier and NORTH pole ice HARRY? If it’s GLOBAL warming
>> then we aren’t _JUST_ talking about the Antarctic but mountain glaciers,
>> if the water’s warmer so is the air. Otherwise we would call it Ocean
>> warming NOT Global Warming/Climate change.
>>
>> Your story begins to unwind when you have to prove your wild claims.
>
> Notice that the above demented right winger can’t come up with a
> single paper written by a single scientist that shows how global
> warming is a fraud. Gutless, cowardly right wingers just don’t want
> to get near the evil science.
>
> And that scientist, the person who can disprove global warming, would
> be instantly famous! He would be hailed world wide. Problem is there
> just aren’t any facts out there and no facts, no paper.
>
> So a right winger can’t come up with any fact, does that surprise you?

All that and you still didn’t tell us where the water is? Those damned
little facts getting in the way of your really great Global warming story.