Re: Socialism

On 5/29/2010 4:23 PM, D&*$?%n wrote:
> On 29 May, 17:38, Beam Me Up Scotty Everyth…@Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote:
>> On 5/28/2010 8:25 PM, P&*$?%s wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> f…@twat.com wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 27 May 2010 18:22:16 -0700, P&*$?%s
>>>> wrote:
>>
>>>>> There is no provision for “give” in any form. The collection of
>>>>> taxes is to be used exclusively for the proper function of the
>>>>> federal government, period. Giving, redistribution, bribery,
>>>>> coercion, etc. are strictly verboten.
>>
>>>> According to what and who?
>>
>>> What: constitution.
>>
>>> Who: read it.
>>
>>> If you disagree, point out where monies can be redistributed.
>>
>>>> Even your own claim ‘proper function of the federal government”
>>>> contains an avenue to “redistribute” tax money by a national congress
>>>> according to policy.
>>
>>> Which policy?
>>
>> You can’t get these Socialists to admit the obvious, that the
>> Constitution is *NOT* compatible with Socialism.
>
> I’m not aware that anyone is talking about socialism. Perhaps you
> don’t know what socialism is….
>
> D&*$?%n
>

That’s getting old, take it back out to the school yard….

I’ve posted what Socialists call socialism. I’m working with the
definition straight from the Horses mouth.

>>
>> # First they need to take your rights…. You can’t give away a right.
>>
>> # There is no Constitution means of Redistribution..
>>
>> # Social Justice is in direct conflict with the Constitution and Equal
>> Justice. You can’t have both Social Justice and Equal Justice at the
>> same time since they are directly opposite.
>>
>> — Hide quoted text -
>>
>> – Show quoted text -
>

–