Fwd: Re: Glenn Beck — “Anarchists” Are for “Total Government”

Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

——– Original Message ——–

Subject:
Re: Glenn Beck — “Anarchists” Are for “Total Government”

Date:
Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:54:49 -0500

From:
Poetic Justice <Poetic-Justice @&*$?%Talk-n-Dog.com>

On 3/4/2010 2:04 AM, Strabo wrote:
> Dan Clore wrote:
>> Strabo wrote:
>>> Dan Clore wrote:
>>>> News & Views for Anarchists & Activists:
>>>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/smygo
>>>>
>>>> The video can be found here: http://www.dailypaul.com/node/125837
>>>>
>>>> Transcript (about 8:50 forward — Beck is pointing to a blackboard
>>>> diagram):
>>>>
>>>> “Okay, I showed you this chart yesterday and I said, this is you,
>>>> kind of in the middle, the vast majority of people are on the
>>>> middle, conservatives are over here, progressives are over here,
>>>> and the fringe elements, and the birthers and 9/11 truthers are
>>>> over here with the progressives, and the birthers and the 9/11
>>>> truthers are over here, with the conservatives as well, but there
>>>> is also something else over, in fact, let me flip this, let me flip
>>>> this over if I can, and show you, is it on this side here, and show
>>>> you what’s on the other side here, because it’s not really right, I
>>>> was thinking about it last night, and it’s really not, it’s really
>>>> not a straight line like that, it’s more of a circle, okay, here
>>>> are the *total government* people, right here, they meet here,
>>>> you’ve got the progressives, over here, and you’ve got the
>>>> *anarchists*, and I don’t even know, the fascists, the people who
>>>> are hiding in the hills, with their Nazi signs, I don’t even know
>>>> who those people are, but here they are, they’re here, on the left
>>>> and the right, the crazy people, who don’t really like America, got
>>>> it? In this group, you have communists, like Van Jones, you have,
>>>> he’s a 9/11 truther, you have Medina, she’s not a communist, she’s
>>>> not an anarchist, she’s really more of a, uh, this is a woman
>>>> that’s running for Texas governor, but she is a 9/11, uh, truther,
>>>> or at least thinks that there are some good questions that haven’t
>>>> been answered, I agree with you, but one of them is not did George
>>>> Bush blow up the World Trade Center, here’s Alan Keyes, he’s a
>>>> birther, this guy, what is this guy’s name again, he’s a Democrat,
>>>> he’s one of the original birthers, what’s his name, Philip Berg,
>>>> he’s a Democrat, he was the first birther, or one of the first ones
>>>> [video ends].”
>>>>
>>>> (Emphasis added.)
>>>>
>>>> So: anarchist = progressive = communist = fascist = crazy = Nazi =
>>>> birther = Democrat = 9/11 truther = total government people!
>>>>
>>>> Any questions?
>>>>
>>> Beck is not a quick study but he is improving.
>>
>> I haven’t really paid much attention to him, but I can only say, if
>> this stuff represents the result of improvement, oy veh!
>>
>
> He didn’t say much about anarchists. It came up on his blackboard
> drawing of political affiliations based on an early test of
> libertarianism.
>
> Beck seems to see anarchy as a non-starter comprised of “crazy people”
> and opposite fascism and communism on his linear graph.
>
> It looked something like this…
>
> |
> Communism |
> ————Progressive———-|——Libertarian—-Anarchy
> Fascism |
> |
>
>
> So once you leave anarchy you enter minimal government or today’s
> libertarian. This was the Republic. Since the 1900s the actions of
> Progressives (Marxist/Socialist/Leninist/Stalinist) have shifted the
> US toward Socialism where Liberals and Conservatives are today.
>
> Since Progressives move away from minimal government and always talk of
> change, they are planning more government and will eventually wind
> up as either Communist or Fascist.
>
> This is much more sophisticated than his attempts to describe relative
> politics a few months ago.
>
> It’s a process of personal learning for him which he must then reconcile
> with Neocon taboos like 9/11, Obama’s birth certificate, federal
> reserve, and others.
>
>

The Federal Reserve is Progressivism….. the rest are off the charts.

The constitution diversifies power, progressives work to consolidate
power. The two are not able to co exist so the Progressives are
chipping away at the limits set by the constitution on Government power.

–