OutSourcedNews-Group

On 1/28/2010 11:16 AM, Rod Speed wrote:
> Beam Me Up Scotty wrote
>> Rod Speed wrote
>>> Beam Me Up Scotty wrote
>>>> duckstandard wrote
>>>>> AZDuffman wrote
>>>>>> John Stafford wrote
>>>>>>> AZDuffman wrote
>
>>>>>>>> http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/space/os-no-moon-for-nasa-2010012…
>>>>>>>> 04.story
>
>>>>>>>> Following a long tradition of democrats since after JFK was assinated,
>>>>>>>> Obama wants to gut the space program and kill the moon mission.
>
>>>>>>> Do you want war or the moon missions? IOW, to make the earth a better
>>>>>>> place now while it’s affordable, or wait until it’s too late to do anything?
>
>>>>>> The moon mission was always a comparatively small part of the
>>>>>> budget, along with all of NASA. We had both “war” and the moon
>>>>>> mission in the 1960s and should be able to afford to do so now.
>>>>>> In fact, today the moon mission is almost a military mission.
>
>>>>>> My point is more that historically JFK was the last dem to
>>>>>> support a bold space program. After him the dems had
>>>>>> more of an attitude of “lets give the money to poor people!”
>
>>>>> Surely if there is money for war, there is money for the poor.
>
>>>> That makes no sense.
>
>>> We’ll see…
>
>>>> Our first need is a place to live free without being killed.
>
>>> That hasnt been a problem for a hell of a long time now.
>
>>> The US didnt have to get involved in WW1 or WW2 or the
>>> Cold War or Vietnam or Korea or anything since on that basis.
>
>>>> If you are in the desert and have enough water to keep one person
>>>> alive for the whole journey or two people to die but die two days before
>>>> you get more water. Do you split the water and both die or would you
>>>> decide on which will likely make it and let them have the water?
>
>>> Irrelevant question. The US has never ever been in that situation.
>
>>>> Now do you protect the NATION or do you split the
>>>> funds and give to the poor while the enemy kills you?
>
>>> There is no enemy that will kill anyone if the poor get given half of the money.
>
>> No one is stopping you and the other Liberals from giving half that money to the poor,
>
> In fact that has been going on for decades now right thruout the modern first world.
>
> You get to like that or lump it and hang yourself any time you like.
>
>> all you need to do is lower your taxes so that
>> you can keep and spend that money how you like.
>
> In fact we keep hiking the taxes fools like you pay and you get to like that or lump that too.
>
>
And we keep spending on Defence and the poor get what’s left over.
Looks like you need to lower the taxes and personally give your money to
the poor.

I intend to keep pushing to spend on Defence and the poor get the
scraps. The only thing you can do to stop me is to work for lower taxes
so you can control your own money.