Re: Content Based Censorship In China v the U. S.
On 1/18/2010 11:38 PM, Bret Cahill wrote:
>>>>> Free speech in China is what the government allows.
>>
>>>> The gummint doesn’t allow free speech for political ads on public
>>>> buses. See Lehman v City of Shaker Heights.
>>
>>> Cain’t have gay nekkid nazi flagburning teabagging
>>> porn on public buses either. Go figure.
>>
>> You mean those women in underwear selling cologne, aren’t porn?
>
> Only a burka isn’t porn according to the Taliban.
>
>
> Bret Cahill
>
Hey I’m trying to discover why government buses have women in underwear.
I get that they might not want that in Saudi Arabia, but why is our
government trying to set sexual behavior as their job on a public bus?
If they are forced ban Church and religious material on public property,
by what right does government have any commercial material on Government
property?