Re: Compare & Contrast: Modern China v Nazi Germany

On 1/19/2010 1:30 PM, Sid9 wrote:
>
> “Poetic Justice” wrote in message
> news:jLm5n.165$3n2.62 @&*$?%newsfe01.iad…
>> On 1/18/2010 10:22 PM, R&*$?%d wrote:
>>> Poetic Justice wrote
>>>> R&*$?%d wrote
>>>>> Poetic Justice wrote
>>>>>> R&*$?%d wrote
>>>>>>> Poetic Justice wrote
>>>>>>>> R&*$?%d wrote
>>>>>>>>> Poetic Justice wrote
>>>>>>>>>> R&*$?%d wrote
>>>>>>>>>>> Poetic Justice wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>> Bret Cahill wrote
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you agree the majority gets to decide taxation issues?
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Under the constitutional restraints.
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And those constitutional restraints are determined by the
>>>>>>>>>>> majority.
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> yet you are expanding the taxes beyond the constitution.
>>>
>>>>>>>>> Another lie.
>>>
>>>>>>>> Explain your constitutional ability to tax/force me to buy
>>>>>>>> health care?
>>>
>>>>>>> That hasnt happened yet.
>>>
>>>>>>>> Explain how you tax peoples “trade of time for money” as income.
>>>
>>>>>>> Covered by the same provision that allows the govt to tax.
>>>
>>>>>> Sorry but no,
>>>
>>>>> Fraid so. Thats what the supremes think and they are what matters
>>>>> on that.
>>>
>>>>> You disagree with them ? You are always free to set
>>>>> fire to yourself outside the supreme court or sumfin.
>>>
>>>>>> the Congress is allowed to tax income, an even trade
>>>>>> with no gain, has no profit and therefore no income to tax.
>>>
>>>>> The constitution doesnt just allow the taxation of profit, stupid.
>>>
>>>>>>>> If you are worth $10 for an hour of work then you made
>>>>>>>> an even trade of $10 for that hour of your life, where was
>>>>>>>> the income or profit that is called income for you to tax?????
>>>
>>>>>>> The constitution doesnt just allow the taxation of income, stupid.
>>>
>>>>>> In fact they had to add the wording in an amendment to allow the
>>>>>> taxing of “INCOME”
>>>
>>>>> They already had the capacity to tax other than income before that,
>>>>> stupid.
>>>
>>>>>> So the ability to tax is limited to those type of taxes enumerated
>>>>>> in the constitution.
>>>
>>>>> And that doesnt just include income and profit, stupid.
>>>
>>>>> Anyway, whatever you pig ignorantly claim, the supremes clearly
>>>>> dont agree with
>>>>> your stupid pig ignorant claim, so you get to like that or lump it
>>>>> or go to jail etc.
>>>
>>>> Explain what tax will be used to tax an even swap of
>>>> one hour of my life for an agreed upon value of dollars?
>>>
>>> They’re taxing your labor, stupid.
>>
>> Labor is taxable, that means when you make coffee for yourself then you
>> are taxed for that labor?
>>
>>>> There is no income, there is no National excise on labor.
>>>
>>> Didnt say anything about excise.
>>
>> The tax is on INCOME which comes from profit and if you have no profit,
>> there is no income.
>>
>> In an equal trade, there is no profit and therefore no income and
>> nothing to tax.
>>
>> If I am willing to help you move a table and in kind you agree to help
>> me move a table, was there a “profit”?
>>
>> If there is no profit there is no income to tax, otherwise you would be
>> forced by the IRS to pay a tax on the labor you received and so would
>> your friend that you help.
>>
>> Which tax is used to tax labor?
>>
>
> Here is the greatest display of ignorance I have ever seen on these pages!

You avoided the answer with that, personal attack….
Somehow you forgot to explain your statements.