Re: Content Based Censorship In China v the U. S.

On 1/18/2010 1:15 AM, Shrikeback wrote:
> On Jan 17, 1:30 pm, Bret Cahill wrote:
>>> Free speech in China is what the government allows.
>>
>> The gummint doesn’t allow free speech for political ads on public
>> buses. See Lehman v City of Shaker Heights.
>
> Cain’t have gay nekkid nazi flagburning teabagging
> porn on public buses either. Go figure.

You mean those women in underwear selling cologne, aren’t porn?