Re: Climate Models Irreducibly Imprecise

On 1/8/2010 6:49 PM, Eric Gisin wrote:
> Nobody mentioned “Irreducible complexity”. Take your meds.
>
> “tg” wrote in message
> news:bfc52a04-3acf-4e66-aa83-e02c736c7154 @&*$?%g18g2000vbr.googlegroups.com…
> On Jan 7, 5:45 pm, “Eric Gisin” wrote:
>> Google “irreducible imprecision” shows this has been discussed for 3+
>> years.
>>
>> http://theresilientearth.com/?q=content/climate-models-irreducibly-im…
>>
>> Submitted by Doug L. Hoffman on Thu, 01/07/2010 – 15:50
>>
>> A number of recent papers analyzing the nature of climate models have
>> yielded a stunning result
>> little known outside of mathematical circles
>
> “Irreducible complexity” is a common Creationist argument.
>
> We figure out complex dynamic non-linear systems all the time;
> arbitrary precision is just that—-arbitrary.

your delusions of being God like are something you need to model on your
computer.

How did you do when you tried solving the complex dynamic instant life
began, have you recreated that one? Or have you been able to explain how
3.5 billion years passed and 2 billion were not able to support life as
we know it….. that means that in about 1.5 billion years you had
enough time to roll the dice and accidentally create life, not only that
but you had to roll those dice billions of times to get DNA that could
reproduce its self.

check the odds on that and then see how precise you are.

And if Life was arbitrarily created by accident, shouldn’t life have
been created more than once and the DNA of some life on this planet
should be radically different from our own DNA…. where is this life
that was also created arbitrarily under different basics?

–