On Mar 13, 5:13 am, Kurt Lochner
wrote: Liberal Fascism
James wrote:
No such thing. Fascism has historically been right-wing..
--You conservatives sure try to lie about that a lot..
What rubbish you spout Kurt
N.A.Z.I was the acronym for the National Socialist Workers party
That is not a right wing title.
It is not a right wing policy that wishes to a improve society
by removing undesirables from it.
You lot see "deniers" as well as 3/4 of mankind as Undesirables
When your policies cause famine as they surely will as more
foodstuffs are burned as fuel you will blame it on GW not on
the silly attempt to reduce CO2.
You no doubt will see the population reduction as
desirable and that makes you a fascist.
Names are like that, the US *Social Security* is anything but... since
it's always running on empty due to Government thieving, and proof is
the politicians that *scare old people every election cycle* that they
will lose their Social Security checks.
Then there is the *Workers Compensation Insurance* which is anything
but.... since it *protects the business owner* from Litigation. Workers
Comp needs to be named *Business Owners Non Liability Insurance*
I say Liberal = Fascist A Fascist by any other name is still a Fascist.
Fascist want to Control the Corporations, Business and the economy...
that's what Todays Liberals do. Hillary wants to take Exxon's
Profit(that's fascism)
Money belongs to the State and the people get only that which the state
allows you to have... That matches Todays Liberals tax beliefs.
Fascist want only Government to have guns... Todays Liberals want the
same thing.
Fascist have no allowance for Individualism(the rights of the
individual).... Todays Liberals are all about the State and there is no
place for Individual rights when the Government has a need the
individual is squashed.
Theese Fascist don't really want to join the other six American Fascist in the party, or on their web site because of the burn the Jews connotations of the Fascists, so the American Fascist movement has slowely trickled into the American movement that best represents it without the hate the Jews montra.... That would be Liberalism the Home Sweet Home of the American Fascist.
Their methods are intimidation....That's what the Brown shirts did
It's hardly cvomparable. The aimns of the Borwn shirts was to
intimidate marginalised groups -- e.g. Jews, communists, trade
Jews were attacked for being rich, Hitler used wealth envy to justify
his hate. Many Jews had money, they were shop keepers, and bankers,
while in general the population was poor after WWI the Jews were maybe
"over represented" in the wealthy part of the population.
Criminal damage does not amount to fascism. Again, it's not the people
per se who are targeted -- but the things they stand for. It's a
challenge to ideas rather than humans. One may think that this is an
unwarranted attempt to limit free expression, but of course, if one
thinks that the fur trade is ethically indefencible then attempts to
paint those involved as unethical (literally as well as figuratively)
are also 'free expression'.
Corporations and government take the nut case liberals serious when they
threaten people and corporations, it costs a lot to secure a corporation
from the Liberal nuts.
That they do, but that still doesn't make liberals -- even 'liberal
nuts' fascists.
It's hardly cvomparable. The aimns of the Borwn shirts was to
intimidate marginalised groups -- e.g. Jews, communists, trade
unionists, homosexuals, those suffering a disability. The first mobile
gas vans using Zyklon B in NAZI Germany were used to euthanase the
mentally ill.
A comparative handful of animal rights activists inconveniencing
selected members of the elite, and typically getting grabbed by the
cops, charged, and suffering legal sanctions is not the same thing.
Not even close.
Fran
When Brown Shirts did it, it was bad.... when Liberal Eco Terrorists do
it, it's "inconveniencing selected members of the elite" I'm sure the
workers that put a chain saw to a tree and hit an unseen spike will be
happy to hear that, since the spike can break the chain and injure the
worker?
Also you said that Hitler's Brown Shirts aim was to "intimidate
marginalized groups" then you give a pass for the attacks on others
by, "animal rights activists inconveniencing selected members of the
elite" Any small group being attacked and intimidated is wrong. Just
because *you* hate the people that acquired more money than yourself
doesn't justify sicking the Liberal version of Brown Shirts or Union thugs on them.
unionists, homosexuals, those suffering a disability. The first mobile
gas vans using Zyklon B in NAZI Germany were used to euthanase the
mentally ill.
A comparative handful of animal rights activists inconveniencing
selected members of the elite, and typically getting grabbed by the
cops, charged, and suffering legal sanctions is not the same thing.
Not even close.
